Slashdot Mirror


NSA Hacked Huawei, Stole Source Code

Charliemopps (1157495) writes "New documents from Snowden indicate that the NSA hacked into and stole documents, including source code, from the Chinese networking firm Huawei. Ironically, this is the same firm that the U.S. government has argued in the past was a threat due to China's possible use of the same sort of attacks."

55 of 287 comments (clear)

  1. No irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's probably how the US govt knows Huawei is a threat...

    1. Re:No irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The US Gov has never articulated exactly how Huawei is a threat with any specificity. The NSA slides don't give any information either. Nothing released to the public has shown that Huawei was ever guilty of any of the things said about them, but on the other hand, the US Gov itself is guilty as hell as far as engaging in the sort of tactics we've accused Huawei of.

    2. Re:No irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      and the rest of the world is learning how untrustworthy the USA is.

    3. Re:No irony by Jmc23 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      No, that's how the US government found out huawei was too hard to hack so they tried to discredit them publicly to get companies to buy equipment to which they had easy access to.

      You know, just like trying to discredit PGP.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    4. Re:No irony by MrBigInThePants · · Score: 2

      I totally agree with your statement but in this context "the rest of the world" was mainly referring to the leaders of other countries.

      The couch vegetables don't count when discussing these issues. What they think only ever matters once every few years at voting time and what they think can be easily installed with scandal, BS and appealing to their bias - so not that much at all really.

      Those that are not the vege type are too small in number to matter as a group.

      You can call me a foolish cynic all you want but I will hold up the entirety of the global political sphere as a counter example and we shall see who is the more foolish! :)

    5. Re:No irony by pathological+liar · · Score: 4, Informative
    6. Re:No irony by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 5, Interesting

      and the rest of the world is learning how untrustworthy the USA is.

      Which country of any consequence is trustworthy? Russia? China? In the EU, Great Britain, France, Spain, Germany, etc. don't exactly have spotless histories. Anyone in South or Central America?

      Places like Denmark, Iceland and New Zealand seem to be pretty trustworthy to me. But for some reason this just doesn't scale very well. From what I can see, and I very well may be wrong, there is some kind of tipping point when a country's population crosses over the 10-20 million mark. Obviously there are exceptions. Perhaps government simply gets too large to manage at that point and it is no longer possible to maintain oversight on everything.

    7. Re:No irony by real-modo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      UM, does anyone else feel like saying F--- Snowden at this point?

      No.

    8. Re:No irony by erikkemperman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nope. Most of the rest if the world is dirt poor, and yet many of these dirt poor folks have the common sense to understand that this is not entirely unrelated to the West being filthy rich. Wealth distribution is pretty much the opposite of what you'd expect looking at natural resource distribution.

      Similarly, even though we in the privileged comfort of our Western sofas like to pretend we're mostly a force for Good in the world, those at the receiving end somehow tend to remember who is propping up the violent and corrupt regimes whose boot rests on their faces.

      --
      Gosh, thanks. That must be why the other ships call me Meatfucker -- GCU Grey Area (Eccentric)
    9. Re:No irony by erikkemperman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      UM, does anyone else feel like saying F--- Snowden at this point?

      Free Snowden? Yeah I'll second that.

      --
      Gosh, thanks. That must be why the other ships call me Meatfucker -- GCU Grey Area (Eccentric)
    10. Re:No irony by 1s44c · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've heard that belief that the US is rich and the rest of the world is poor very many times. I've travelled to a few countries and can tell you without a doubt that although there are plenty of poorer places there are plenty of richer places too. There are lots of countries with better infrastructure and better standards of living.

      The US has a very positive self-image. That's a great thing. But sometimes it can cover up things that are wrong and could be fixed.

    11. Re:No irony by erikkemperman · · Score: 2

      The motivations will be a form of jealously and lack of exposure to the PR machine that people who can afford a TV are exposed to.

      It seems to me these are consequences, not causes (or motivations as you put it).

      It works like this:

      - An impoverished person is just a poor person without the basic means for survival
      - A poor person is just a middle-class person without sufficient income
      - A middle-class person is just a rich person without the surplus cash
      - A rich person is just a millionaire without the millions
      - A millionaire is just a billionaire.....

      You are describing how it is very difficult to hide "upwards" class differences (everyone is acutely aware of the things that are just out of their reach) because so much wealth is spent on advertising same. Conversely it seems this is easy in the other direction (wealthy individuals tend to spend much of it on "downward" insulation, gated communities, exclusive social occasions).

      --
      Gosh, thanks. That must be why the other ships call me Meatfucker -- GCU Grey Area (Eccentric)
    12. Re:No irony by ganjadude · · Score: 3, Interesting

      actually the majority of the world doesnt pay attention because they are living on pennies a day

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    13. Re:No irony by MrBigInThePants · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, I agree. My point was that those poor people, should they find themselves wealthy, would most likely move up into a gated community and pull the ladder up behind them.

      This is what tends to happen...

  2. Personal Liberty! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wait,... isn't this the purpose of the NSA?

    1. Re:Personal Liberty! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Wait,... isn't this the purpose of the NSA?

      Yep, if Snowden continues along this path he is moving into 'Traitor" territory. I only support him because he releases information on Domestic spying - this is completely within the realm of a FIA.

    2. Re:Personal Liberty! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just as much as it is the job of the army to invade foreign countries and kill their people. Unless we're actively at war with that country, then no, they shouldn't be doing it, and it is an illegal act of aggression. That, and I'm not really sure how a company that isn't involved in anything military should be considered any different from a civilian; NSA doesn't give a fuck about any boundaries.

      Plus, might I remind you, the NSA is also attacking American citizens.

    3. Re:Personal Liberty! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 5, Informative

      Snowden isn't releasing anything. He just dumped what he had on some journalists; they are the ones doing these slow staged releases.

    4. Re:Personal Liberty! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Y'know what? Fuck you. This whole 'outrage over domenstic activity, but foreign-spying is a-ok' attitude has got to stop.

      I'm not American. The notion a foreign power can root through my data, without my or my governments consent, with no repercussions and the full support of people like you, is abhorrent to me.

      Traitor? The man becomes more of a hero with every tidbit like this he releases. A Hero to the rest of us. Because you no longer count.

    5. Re:Personal Liberty! by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

      In this case to the benefit of China.

      Snowden claimed to be an expert about China and espionage. When do you think we'll see some information about that? Or will the trend of only releasing information the compromises intelligence methods and activities of the US, UK, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and their allies continue?

      He is indeed the rarest of "patriots," exposing only the intelligence plans of his own country and its allies, and not those of its adversaries.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    6. Re:Personal Liberty! by symbolset · · Score: 2

      Which is why you do due diligence on the background checks on temporary sysadmin subcontractors you trust with the NSA's crown jewels. Wouldn't want to be responsible for empowering some crackpot to let the entire herd of cats out of the bag, eh?

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    7. Re:Personal Liberty! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Interesting

      To reiterate: Snowden is not releasing anything. He took what he got from the NSA internal networks, and handed that over. The way it gets released is subject only to the whim of the journalists who have the dump now. I would imagine that NSA significantly more information about how they spy on everyone, including China, than they have on how China is spying on them. For the latter, we'd need a Chinese Snowden equivalent.

      By the way, why are you guys still on this? Every time one of you NSA assholes opens your mouth, you only make it worse for yourself. Not that there is much worse to go - aside from all the trodding on the Constitution, the entire Snowden affair has also shown just how lame and incompetent NSA actually is. A contractor admin taking a dump of most of your internal network resources, including top secret / classified stuff, without even hiding much, and you only find out about that from the newspapers? In any sane country, an intelligence agency so inept would be disbanded on the next day, not even as a punishment, but simply because God knows how many actual Russian/Chinese/Iranian/... spies are inside, doing what Snowden did, except for that whole going to the journalists part. In any authoritarian country, the entire top management team would already be shot for criminal negligence (if not sabotage).

    8. Re:Personal Liberty! by jma05 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is the most BS I have seen in this article. I almost want to think you get paid for this.

      > In this case to the benefit of China.

      The point of the article is not whether it benefits China. The point is that US has been accusing other countries of doing things that it itself does many times over... things that it implied that it would find so abhorrent that it would never consider doing. This news would have been a lot less depressing if it was found that China broke into Cisco... because China does not lecture the world on digital principles.

      As a non-american, I actually want US to be the bearer of high values in cyber space so that we have someone to point to and say - that is how things are supposed to be done. It has been incredibly disappointing to follow these revelations. Fortunately, the US tech community still holds high values, even if the corporates clearly don't.

      The case of Huawei isn't just about China. It's products are used the world over. Attacking them is an attack on the communications of the world in general, not an attack on someone you can conveniently label as a communist enemy. There is no cold war here.

      > Snowden claimed to be an expert about China and espionage. When do you think we'll see some information about that?

      Snowden is a counter-intel guy on China. He does not have policy documents on China. Why is this even hard for you to grasp?
      What you are demanding is like China asking when Ai Weiwei and Chen Guangcheng will criticize US, rather than just China. That's not their responsibility.

      > Or will the trend of only releasing information the compromises intelligence methods and activities of the US, UK, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and their allies continue?

      First, he can only disclose what he had direct access to. If you want China docs, get a Chinese whistleblower.

      Second, none of the disclosures are considered “methods”. The journalists have been cautious to not disclose them.

      > He is indeed the rarest of "patriots," exposing only the intelligence plans of his own country and its allies, and not those of its adversaries.

      Please provide a list of these non-rare patriots that expose intelligence plans on both sides.

    9. Re:Personal Liberty! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I know that there are plenty of misguided people who are not really affiliated with the organization that they effectively propagandize for, but in your case I'm having serious doubts about that. You're always in very early on any story that even tangentially mentions any US security agency, and particularly NSA, or on any comment along those lines even in otherwise unrelated stories. It's almost as if you had an RSS filter for those keywords.

      Mind you, I'm not saying that your boss at NSA is paying you for it. You're likely some kind of very small fish there anyway (not menial work, though - you have to be actually doing something relevant to the core mission of the organization to feel personally offended about Snowden and what he represents). And the only reason why you're posting here is some kind of perverted esprit de corps, where your employer being ridiculed automatically translates to some personal butthurt for yourself, and an itch to post all these "rebuttals" of yours.

    10. Re:Personal Liberty! by erikkemperman · · Score: 4, Informative

      American companies have been hurt to the tune of billions of dollars. US intelligent efforts overseas have been crippled.

      And before they profited to the tune of billions thanks to trade secrets that just happened to find their way from NSA into their spotless hands.

      I understand your point about the difference of revealing domestic vs foreign spying, but even the latter category of leaks has demonstrated that NSA are operating way beyond it's stated purpose (which is security not economic superiority) at a huge cost to US taxpayers. In other words, still bona fide whistleblowing as far as I'm concerned.

      --
      Gosh, thanks. That must be why the other ships call me Meatfucker -- GCU Grey Area (Eccentric)
    11. Re:Personal Liberty! by ganjadude · · Score: 3

      I dont agree with that tactic, When I mod, I dont even look at user names i mod based on the content of the post. I cant stand when people start to mod down people because of who said it, rather than what was said

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    12. Re: Personal Liberty! by jma05 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > I'm not sure who you've been listening to but if you think the US pretends not to spy you really are unaware of the world around you.

      Are you dense? Where do you think the outrage in the world is coming from if this was all understood as typical espionage activity.

      Let me answer that for you. This isn't simple foreign spying. No one expected NSA to be spying on entire populations of the world. There is no spy agency in the world that does that. It is legitimate to do targeted espionage. Every country does that. This is not about nabbing a foreign terrorist or spying on diplomats.

      People simply expected US to do a better job at targeted espionage than anyone else. No one also expected NSA to be engaged in character assassinations of conspiracy theorists and social manipulations of hactivists. US always promoted the rhetoric that these things as abhorrent and incompatible with its values and for the rest of the world.

      And don't answer with an attitude that US can do what it wants and that it is up to foreign governments to protect their civilians either. US purports itself to be the leader of the free world and these actions are incompatible with that role. If it wants to simply be an imperial power - fine. Unless US addresses these issues, the world will reconfigure itself to such an implicit declaration in time.

    13. Re: Personal Liberty! by jma05 · · Score: 2

      Read all that. We all know our Chomsky. I know how to pick my media, thank you.
      The CIA adventurism was supposed to have been largely reined in by the congress in the 70s. The Internet stuff is new. Again, where do you think the new outrage is coming from. The world knows the history of US spy agencies.

  3. NSA validated in their concerns? by saps1e · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So if they have access to the source code, does this mean that the NSA is speaking authoritatively when they say Huawei's routers do have backdoors for the Chinese govt?

  4. Re:Good for NSA by khasim · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No. Huawei is a commercial company. Not a government.

    This is our government engaging in corporate espionage.

  5. Huawei source code, take 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    #include "cisco.h"

    sigh...

  6. The jokes on you NSA by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Informative

    Huawei had stolen the code from Cisco. So it is no big loss for them. They are laughing at NSA for not getting the source from the source.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  7. Re:Good for NSA by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

    That's what they were paid for. Good job, NSA.

    Yes, but that sort of thing tends to be more valuable when it isn't publicized.

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  8. Re:Retaliation is fair game by Jmc23 · · Score: 2
    Remind us again why the US was there in the first place.

    Fucking kool-aid drinkers.

    --
    Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
  9. No he did the right thing by future+assassin · · Score: 2

    He releases in between Dancing With the Starts to catch people attention before they go back to the next reality tv show.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  10. Re:Retaliation is fair game by YukariHirai · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Merely fighting against America does not necessarily make them bad guys, in a reasonably objective sense. If you are American, then anyone fighting against you would seem to be bad guys from your point of view, but from an outsider's point of view, it's just "these guys" and "these other guys".

    Some might argue that them hacking makes them bad guys by some measure, but the US has been doing the same thing, so I'd consider that inconclusive at best and hypocrisy at worst. Others might argue that the stuff done to Americans during the Vietnam War makes them bad guys, but given everything done by the Americans during the Vietnam War... well, same conclusion.

    With that said of course, the Chinese government has had a history of doing some very shitty things to a lot of people. On the other hand, so has the US government...

  11. Re:Good for NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I guess you missed the part where it's in China. Communist/fascist regimes don't have distinctions like that.

    Neither do US corporations either... Microsoft, Google, Apple, Yahoo, RSA & others all collect data for the NSA.

  12. Re:Good for NSA by jovius · · Score: 3

    So NSA does its job by stealing documents from China. Chinese do their job by stealing documents from the US. Snowden as a whistleblower does his job by exposing the documents. Its win-win-win for all.

  13. Re:Wow !! by binarylarry · · Score: 5, Funny

    Huawei so serious?

    --
    Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
  14. Re:Good for NSA by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's what they were paid for. Good job, NSA.

    Except that they just undermined their government's protests and Chinese hacking. Unlike US allegations against China which are pretty thin the Chinese now have concrete evidence of international law-breaking and industrial espionage against them. Expect it to be used against the US at the WTO and whenever the US tries to make any complaints about hacking in the future.

    It will be interesting to see how the US government tries to spin this. They said in the past that hacking could be considered an act of war, retaliated against with conventional weapons as well as cyberattacks. It's pretty much open season on the US now, and you can expect to see virus attacks on US infrastructure in the future. All thanks to the NSA.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  15. Re:Retaliation is fair game by AHuxley · · Score: 2

    Why was "military stuff" near any vast fast public networks? What contractor or gov worker would connect a site, factory, base, supply system to a public network for anyone to 'try' for from some competing or hostile distant nation? Thats why most wealthy nations had dedicated hardened networks and very skilled staff. Only poor nations used their own low quality civilian like telco systems for encoded mill use.
    i.e. you get into a typing pool or low security mil network or its a massive well crafted honeypot.
    i.e. after the first few attempts by other nations to 'look' at the more secret networks - would steps be taken to remove or not connect military stuff from easy public networks with suspect international access?
    If the US was so good on the offensive part as we are now understanding via whistleblowers and the US press the hardened/secure parts would have been as impressive over decades?
    So expect the stories of mass 'military stuff' been lost via huge open fast public networks interfacing with fast not secure mil networks to be propaganda, a domestic recruiting tool (get a smart well paying mil job to help save the nations networks), extra funding stories of local political leaders (boondoggles) or junk science that could be lost with no risk.
    The US had a total mastery of getting into other nations networks globally but much less understanding in not connecting its own real data to the same fast open junk public/academic/telco networks?
    Expect honeypots, ended projects, altered work and disinformation to have been found at the end of most "hacking military stuff" - good enough to keep another nation best occupied/spending for years and follow back the hackers networks but not anything too useful.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  16. Re:Good for NSA by plover · · Score: 2

    When China engages in spying on corporate America, they spy on companies like Valspar for the formula the US Navy uses to protect warships from rust. They then give that information to Chinese firms to make durable paint for their own navy, and to turn a huge profit.

    When the NSA spies on Huawei, they use the information to discover vulnerabilities they then go on to internally use to exploit the infrastructure of those who use them. They do not give the information to Cisco in order to make more efficient American routers (that are then made in China.).

    So China uses industrial espionage to strengthen their military and economy. The NSA uses industrial espionage to weaken the security of everyone equally.

    See the difference? Me neither.

    --
    John
  17. Re:Good for NSA by ark1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    It will be interesting to see how the US government tries to spin this.

    "It was not theft, it was copyright infringement."

  18. Re:Retaliation is fair game by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2

    Right.

    However I have some Chinese friends who aren't too happy with the history of their government. The remember things like relatives being bundled off to the provinces to never be seen again.

    Remember the empty chair.

    http://www.economist.com/blogs...

    America has plenty of problems but....

  19. Re:NSA validates the right to steal source code by sconeu · · Score: 4, Funny

    IPv4 or IPv6?

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  20. Re:Retaliation is fair game by frist · · Score: 2

    There is no comparison my friend. You need to read about the glorious peoples' revolution in china. You need to read about 30 million people dying to famine because of Mao. When people compare the USA with China or the Soviet Union, it just shows how ignorant they are of history.

  21. Act of war... according to US by jma05 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    > Wait,... isn't this the purpose of the NSA?

    According to US government, hacking communication infrastructure of a country by another government is an "act of war", not regular espionage. They said this very loudly just before Snowden revelations began. So NO. They are not supposed to be doing that.

    1. Re:Act of war... according to US by ignavus · · Score: 2

      > Wait,... isn't this the purpose of the NSA?

      According to US government, hacking communication infrastructure of a country by another government is an "act of war", not regular espionage. They said this very loudly just before Snowden revelations began. So NO. They are not supposed to be doing that.

      Ah, but when we do it, it is a glorious action undertaken for freedom, truth, and to protect innocent children.

      But when those foreigners do the same thing, it is because they are mean, slinking, low scoundrels.

      There's a world of difference. Anyone can see that!

      --
      I am anarch of all I survey.
  22. The USSR was fail by hessian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It led to some controversial things such as the Vietnam war, but it was effective at stopping the Soviet Union from conquering more territory.

    Which, given what a social, political, environmental and cultural wasteland the Communists left behind wherever they gained authority, was a justifiable and in fact laudable goal.

  23. Here we go again by dbIII · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Q: Why is Snowden a traitor and North not?
    Please show your working.


    I'll bet it's an amusing little bit that skates around some view that Snowden was betraying a King for his country and North betraying his country in the way he served his King. I really don't get why people like you want to spit in the face of George Washington and go back to King George.

    1. Re:Here we go again by dbIII · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So supplying weapons to a terrorist group less than a year after they killed over a hundred US marines is not treason but leaking to a newspaper is? If you are being serious then you are not in a position to be lecturing others on mental illness.

    2. Re:Here we go again by dbIII · · Score: 3, Insightful
      So there we go - interests of a corrupt few and a terrorist group before a nation. Now at least the readers here know where you are coming from when you call Snowden a traitor.

      But I never said anything about Treason, I said traitor

      What a pathetic attempt to weasel out and not take responsibility for your own words.

  24. Re:Good for NSA by dbIII · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They do not give the information to Cisco in order to make more efficient American routers

    Maybe they do. One odd thing to come out was taxpayer funded industrial espionage of Indonesian clove cigarettes for "US commercial clients". I wonder how much commercial spying is going on and what the kickbacks to the intelligence agencies or those issuing the orders are.

  25. Why prent to be that stupid? by dbIII · · Score: 2

    So you want us to bring up slavery?
    Now do you understand how STUPID your attempted goalpost shift above is.

  26. #include "cisco.h" by phitsanu · · Score: 2

    #include "cisco.h"