Slashdot Mirror


TSA Missed Boston Bomber Because His Name Was Misspelled In a Database

schwit1 sends this news from The Verge: "Tamerlan Tsarnaev, the primary conspirator in the Boston Marathon bombing that killed three people, slipped through airport security because his name was misspelled in a database, according to a new Congressional report. The Russian intelligence agency warned U.S. authorities twice that Tsarnaev was a radical Islamist and potentially dangerous. As a result, Tsarnaev was entered into two U.S. government databases: the Terrorist Identities Datamart Environment and the Treasury Enforcement Communications System (TECS), an interagency border inspection database.

A special note was added to TECS in October of 2011 requiring a mandatory search and detention of Tsarnaev if he left the country. 'Detain isolated and immediately call the lookout duty officer,' the note reportedly said. 'Call is mandatory whether or not the officer believes there is an exact match.' 'Detain isolated and immediately call the lookout duty officer.' Unfortunately, Tsarnaev's name was not an exact match: it was misspelled by one letter. Whoever entered it in the database spelled it as 'Tsarnayev.' When Tsarnaev flew to Russia in January of 2012 on his way to terrorist training, the system was alerted but the mandatory detention was not triggered. Because officers did not realize Tsarnaev was a high-priority target, he was allowed to travel without questioning."

52 of 275 comments (clear)

  1. Jeez by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's a bomber, I mean bummer.

    1. Re:Jeez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Hate to see the guy that was mistaken as the terrorist because of a wrong letter.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brazil_(1985_film)
      >One day he is assigned the task of trying to rectify an error caused by a fly getting jammed in a printer, which caused it to misprint a file, resulting in the incarceration and death during interrogation of Mr. Archibald Buttle instead of the suspected "terrorist", Archibald Tuttle.

      Good movie.

  2. No. You do not get to pull this bullshit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The TSA is operated by some of the most incompetent people the USA has to offer. They are the problem, not the hardware or software. I fail to see why they should get a "free pass" here on account of a bad database entry. Heads should be hung over this, especially considering the justifications thrown around for the continued existence of the TSA.

    1. Re:No. You do not get to pull this bullshit. by bickerdyke · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The TSA is operated by some of the most incompetent people the USA has to offer. They are the problem, not the hardware or software.

      Not neccessarily. The problem is the political setup of this whole thing.

      From top manager to front row goon: You're on the safe side as long as you never think and just follow orders. No mistakes will get you promoted at some point. But deviation from the rules will either let a terrorist slip through or earn you some re-training, if your manager sees it.

      And it's the same at the top tier: New security theater rules can always be explained as "inconvinient but neccessary". But lifting even the most stupid rule of all is only a personal risk, if at some point in time after lifting a rule an incident is indeed happening.

      So there is simply no incentive to be sensilbe.

      --
      bickerdyke
  3. We already knew this way back in 2013 by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've seen this story about Russia giving us warnings about the Boston bomber floating around elsewhere recently, why is this news now? We knew this back in 2013.

    Despite the misspelling, the FBI interviewed him and determined he was no threat (unlike his friend who they interviewed after the bombing, and shot to death during the interview).

    So what would it have mattered if airport security searched him after one of his trips to Russia? It's almost certain he wasn't carrying anything that would have got him arrested.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  4. Helpful links for intelligence community devs by rk · · Score: 4, Informative

    soundex

    Levenshtein distance

    Hamming distance

    More like this, can't be arsed to go looking them up, though. Those were three I knew off the cuff.

    1. Re:Helpful links for intelligence community devs by Cryacin · · Score: 5, Funny

      So, Mr oBama would have a Levenshtein distance of 1 with oSama then? Good job there.

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    2. Re:Helpful links for intelligence community devs by vux984 · · Score: 2

      A major problem with soundex is false positives. A terrorist named John Smith on the watch list would be hell on a lot of people... but if they were using soundex... he's now J500 S530. So Now Jan, Jim, Jens, Jon, Jaymee, Jayne, Jane cross product with Smith, Smit, Smite, Smithe, Smithee, Smythe, Smathe, Snuthe, Smothe...

      all get caught in that web.

      Similar problems exist for hamming and so on. There's a LOT of very different names a very short "distance" from each other in nearly any scheme.

      But on top of all the false positives, your still going to miss people due to typos and data entry issues:

      David and Dacid is just fat fingering the keyboard and missing the v for c, resulting in a different soundex.

      Similarly Christy and Chritsy is simple transposition error during typing, resulting in a different soundex.

    3. Re:Helpful links for intelligence community devs by vux984 · · Score: 2

      How many "bin laden/bin ladin/bin ladan/ben laden/etc" names are there in the US

      bin Laden is, if i recall correctly, little more than "son of Laden"

      Osama's full name per wikipedia is:

      Osama bin Mohammed bin Awad bin Laden

      Granted its not a common American name, but as a middle eastern name, it might as well be Tom O'Conner.

      False positives would be restricted to relatively small populations anyway, like Muslims and non-Western names.

      Yes. Small populations, like "foreigners". This is not a good plan.

      The other thing you're ignoring is that name matching is just part of identity verification.

      I'm not ignoring it. I'm not suggesting we're going to be arresting muslim grandmothers, I'm just pointing out that false positives waste time, and a LOT of false positives is like the boy who cries wolf, the border agents will ignore them if the computer cries terrorists on every flight.

      Yeah there could be a typo in the name. But in the case we're talking about, it wasn't a typo, it was an alternate phonetic spelling.

      The point there was simply that it closes plugs one small whole in a very leaky boat.

  5. Significance? by mwehle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think the tacit implication here is that if Tsarnaev had been questioned on exiting the country the Boston Marathon bombing might have been averted, but is there really any substance to this? Do we think he would have changed plans had he been questioned? Pressure cooker outlets would have been alerted to refuse to sell him cookware? What exactly would the outcome likely have been had he been questioned?

    --
    Wir sind geboren, um frei zu sein - Rio Reiser
  6. transliteration by Heraklit · · Score: 5, Informative

    News at Nine: transliterations of names can be tricky... Some parts of the world use different alphabets...

  7. It was not misspelled by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It was not misspelled, it was just transliterated differently. The original name is Cyrillic, and "Tsarnayev" is actually closer to how it is supposed to be pronounced, but "Tsarnaev" is the more usual letter-for-letter transliteration that doesn't distinguish two modes of Russian "e" (it's pronounced as "e" in general, but as "ye" after vowels and at the beginning of words), and is the one that's usually used in passports. I wouldn't be surprised if "Tsarnayev" was how it was spelled in the documents that they've got from Russia, because the person on the other side translated it phonetically...

    Either way, this points at a glaring issue in all those databases. If they require a perfect match, they're going to be very flaky for all kinds of foreign names - ironically, Arabic ones especially, which I assume are the most commonly searched ones. Remember that whole Qaddafi vs Gaddafi vs Kaddafi in US press when Libya was on the front pages?

    Yet another evidence that all this stuff is little more but security theater. It doesn't matter whether it actually works, so long as people are convinced that it does. Unfortunately, they actually let a real terrorist through this time...

    1. Re:It was not misspelled by manicb · · Score: 5, Funny

      If only there were some kind of universal character set that included all these scripts

    2. Re:It was not misspelled by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      I doubt having them type names in their original script would help matters. Cyrillic is easy, but how many DHS agents can input Arabic? Chinese? If anything, I'd suspect that the amount of typos would increase significantly.

      What they need to do is proper phonetic match, tailored to the specific language in question (i.e. if it's an English name, use soundex or something along those lines, if it's Russian, use the Russian equivalent etc).

      Of course, what they really need is to just drop all this bullshit and start paying less attention to names and more attention to people. Gee, guys who moved from a region with a separatist underground movement that quickly evolved into hardline Islamist organization? And they emigrated citing support for said separatist movement? Maybe you should keep an eye on them, just in case. Like, so that if the kids start posting videos with "allahu akbar" beheadings on their public YouTube channel, you'd notice and figure that maybe there's something going on there...

    3. Re:It was not misspelled by AHuxley · · Score: 4, Informative

      Russian names should not be an issue for the USA in ~2000~2014. They have spent vast sums educating their mil and gov during the cold war and have had US digital database experts since the 1960's...
      The US is not some loser nation with massive budget restrictions upgrading from paper files to imported super computers in the 1970's.
      The US is not some loser nation with massive budget restrictions trying to find staff with language skills in the 1950's.
      This is not Korea or Vietnam in the 1950-60's where the US gov did have to play catch up.
      The USA did great work tracking the KGB/GRU and others within the USA for many decades and that took spelling skills and complex shared database work.
      The USA did great work tracking the KGB/GRU staff changes... and that took spelling and database work too.
      If the USA is having issues with Russian names in a US gov database after 2000++ - someone has ensured a name is protected/free to travel.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    4. Re:It was not misspelled by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      My understanding is that the misspelling did not originate with the guy himself. It's not like he has two passports, when he crosses the border it's his passport that'll be used to identify him, and the name as it is spelled there (and that would normally be "-ev" rather than "-yev"). The screw-up happened where they were compiling the no-go list, and the alternative spelling slipped in somehow - and if I had to guess, they just keyed it in letter by letter from the email or fax that they've got from Russian side, and the guy on Russian side who composed it transliterated the Cyrillic name that he had the best way he could, which was different from the "standard" (for passports) name.

      Even when the change is deliberate, it's not necessarily malicious. I've been in this boat myself, since my family name also ends up with the same suffix, as is common for Russians and other Russian nationals with russified family names. Originally, I consistently used the "-yev" spelling online and in all kinds of formal documents which I had to fill in English, which includes e.g. some of my early IT certificates. When I got my first passport for foreign travels, however, it had the "-ev" spelling per their standard, and I switched everything else to this spelling, as well, to avoid confusion and to be able to easily prove that I am me, should the need arise.

  8. I wrote anti-terrorist software for banks. by quietwalker · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've written about this before; I used to write financial software for a living, and one of the requirements for a US bank was to provide a mechanism to detect transactions by an unauthorized person.

    In short, the govt. provides a list of bad people in a text file. One name per line, all upper case, like it came out of an old batch system. We then check to see if the sender or receiver of any transaction /EXACTLY/ matches that string, case insensitive. If it's an exact letter-for-letter match, there's a flag that's set and the transaction is delayed, but it appears to go through as normal(*). What happens after that is the bank's responsibility, but that's the whole of the complexity.

    Whoever made the list usually has a few variants of spelling; OSAMA BIN LADEN or OMASA BIN LADEN or OSMA BIN LADEN, for example. But that's it. Just spelling your name slightly differently is enough to avoid the flag. We're literally not allowed to add anything else, like soundex matching or handling foreign letters.

    This is ~probably~ also how the TSA no fly list works, and why you still hear about false positives from time to time. It's also probably how any security works until it's been around for 20 years and they hire a contracting company to make them really good software that does what they want, instead of what they think they want it to do.

    It just takes a very long time for software designed by a legislative committee with no technical awareness to morph into something usable, but that's government for you.

    * - most transactions are not sent out until the end-of-day reconciliation anyway, so it looks like it's accepted like most other transactions, probably in a 'pending' state in your online balance - unless you're paying for a wire transfer or something.

    1. Re:I wrote anti-terrorist software for banks. by quietwalker · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes.

      It's no longer making the news, but for a while it was a nearly-daily occurrence. It's just not a big media draw anymore, unless it impacts a politician or famous entertainer.

  9. BULLSHIT - COVER STORY by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2

    They never tell you the truth. All assertion, no evidence.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
    1. Re:BULLSHIT - COVER STORY by noh8rz10 · · Score: 2

      Buttle, meet Tuttle. I can't believe this hasn't come up yet on this thread.

    2. Re:BULLSHIT - COVER STORY by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2

      Sometimes they tell the truth; when it is in their best interest.

      Limited Hangout:

      "A 'limited hangout' is spy jargon for a favorite and frequently used gimmick of the clandestine professionals. When their veil of secrecy is shredded and they can no longer rely on a phony cover story to misinform the public, they resort to admitting - sometimes even volunteering - some of the truth while still managing to withhold the key and damaging facts in the case. The public, however, is usually so intrigued by the new information that it never thinks to pursue the matter further."

      -- Victor Marchetti (August 14, 1978) The Spotlight

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
  10. Re:Soundex Algorithm by Cryacin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Great, so now not only if we are a namesake with a wanted "enemy of the state", but also if our names are soundex or Levenshtein Distance 3 similar, we are going to get detained, cavity searched and otherwise.

    --
    Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
  11. Not just misspelled, but misspelled *differently* by Max+Threshold · · Score: 4, Informative

    Neither "Tsarnaev" nor "Tsarnayev" is the correct spelling; the correct spelling is "ЦÐÑнÐÌÐÐ".

    As another commenter mentioned, utility companies solved this problem decades ago with technology like Soundex. Our intelligence apparatus is apparently crippled by incompetence, laziness, haste, provincialism, or all of the above.

  12. Spell That by puddingebola · · Score: 2

    Tamerlan Tsarnaev- T-I-M-T-H-O-M-A-S. I am professional hockey player.

  13. His name was diabolical! by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 5, Funny

    That fiend had changed his name to "Tsarnayev'); DROP TABLE Terrorists; --"

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  14. Get rid of the TSA! by colin_faber · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Seriously, this entire organization encompasses everything wrong with the Federal government. Massive privacy overreach, complete incompetence, and a literal NIGHTMARE BUREAUCRACY! This is one of the worst aspects of the Bush legacy, and "The One" has not done anything to curtail its power: http://www.cnn.com/2010/TRAVEL...

    1. Re:Get rid of the TSA! by ShaunC · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's also an enormous jobs program, employing 50,000 nut-cuppers and breast-gropers alone, without even getting started on air marshals, behavioral analysts, and of course thousands more management positions. Don't expect TSA disappear anytime soon, no matter who's in the White House.

      --
      Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
    2. Re:Get rid of the TSA! by Sir+Holo · · Score: 2

      Mod parent up.

      TSA was created not only a gigantic practical-joke on the middle class. It was also created as a means to mask growing unemployment. All for political points.

      "Fiscal responsibility" indeed.

  15. Re:Who says computers will take over.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The most advanced systems in the world will never outpace human mistakes.

    If you type "Tsarnayev" (the way his name was incorrectly spelled" into Google, the first match is: wikipedia.org/wiki/Dzhokhar_and_Tamerlan_Tsarnaev

    So I'll call bullshit on your claim, and also note that the database entry error was only the last in a long series of events. (try reading the article)

    The problem was not "human mistakes". The problem was a string of incompetent and corrupt police and FBI agents. Mistakes are accidents, the string of fuck-ups in this case were anything BUT mistakes.

  16. Re:Who says computers will take over.... by Sique · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Never attribute to malice what sufficiently can be explained with stupidity.

    This is a clear case of "blinded by data".

    --
    .sig: Sique *sigh*
  17. Re:More lies from the Republicans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Exactly. This is clearly all Bush's fault. Glorious Leader Obamessiah never does any wrong.

    Yes, actually you could argue it's Bush's fault, and the GOP's fault.
    You see, they were too busy crying about Clinton's jizz on a Blue Dress to pay attention to some guy named "Bin Laden" who was blowing up embassies. They got so pissed at Clinton for launching cruise missiles at training camps that after he left office, Bush completely halted all operations against his network. Then they proceeded to ignore multiple public warnings and threats, and after the first airplane hit the tower Bush felt it was more important to finish reading "My Pet Goat" to some kids than it was to immediately ground all commercial air traffic in the region.

    For the record, I'm a Conservative. But I'm not an idiot, either, and can do more than puke up "clever" insults I heard on Rush's nutjob radio show.

  18. new meme....deliberate misspelling by turkeydance · · Score: 2

    john or jhon or joohn....... every one gets a different one.

  19. Re:Who says computers will take over.... by Eddi3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm not at all disputing the idea of what you're saying. In fact, I agree that incompetence let this guy through.

    However, your example of googling this guy's name is a particularly bad one. Google's autocorrection algorithms are based on the popularity of terms and their similarities. Since the bombing, surely this name would have been googled millions of times.

    Do you really suppose that Google would have made such an accurate correction before the Boston attacks that madetheir family name infamous?

  20. No, no . . . Archibald Buttle by Idou · · Score: 4, Funny

    It should have been: Archibald Tuttle

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
  21. Re:Soundex Algorithm by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

    if our names are soundex or Levenshtein Distance 3 similar,

    "that's Levenshtein with an ei and Levenshtyne with a y" *

    (*) my son, the terrorist

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  22. Re:Who says computers will take over.... by reboot246 · · Score: 2

    My last name has at least four different spellings, maybe more. If you enter one of them into Google, some exact matches will be found. But, if you enter them into a genealogical search engine, all the variations of the name will be found. Google is good at what Google does, but it's not always the best search engine for every task.

  23. As much as the TSA sucks... by Patent+Lover · · Score: 2

    ... this had nothing to do with the TSA. They just make sure people bring bombs, snow globes, or nail clippers onto planes. Even if they detained the correctly spelled Tsarnaev, he did nothing illegal until he built and set off a bomb. Some day the DHS will realize that they have to do real police work instead of making lists that depend on correctly spelled names.

  24. Ellis Island Syndrome by swschrad · · Score: 2

    we can require everybody to change their name. but we still end up with Anderson, Andersen, Anderssen, etc.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
    1. Re:Ellis Island Syndrome by mcrbids · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Heck, my Father in law spent most of his childhood writing his name wrong when his parents forgot how they'd spelled it on the birth certificate! He found out about it when he got his driver's license as a teen...

      I mean, if a kid's parents can't be trusted to spell a guy's name right, how do you figure a secretary is going to get it right 100% of the time?

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
  25. Re:Soundex Algorithm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How is that not probable cause for a warrant?

    Police: Sir, open up, we're here to search your house.
    You: On what grounds?
    Police: On the grounds that your name, Bill McGonigle, bears a striking resemblance to the known terrorist, Bill McGonicle.

    Yeah, that is totally ok. /sarcasm

  26. No by 7-Vodka · · Score: 2

    They missed the Boston bombers because they are spying ON EVERYONE instead of focusing the spying, based on probable cause, on the correct folks.

    --

    Liberty.

    1. Re:No by Sir+Holo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They missed the Boston bombers because they are spying ON EVERYONE instead of focusing the spying, based on probable cause, on the correct folks.

      Well, yes. But, paradoxically, failure earns the spy agencies more funding.

      "If we had been provided with enough resources, we could have caught the bad guys!"

      The solution is to limit (yet again) exactly who they can spy on. These children need to be spanked, not rewarded with ice cream.

  27. Re:Who says computers will take over.... by Anonymuous+Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    This is not a case of misspelling (think Notingham) or variant spelling (think Britney vs. Brittany). There's simply no standard way of transliterating Russian names. Cyrillic "e" may be pronounced "eh", "yeh", "yo", "o" or "ih" and some people will use some kind of phonetic approximation so they don't have their names too badly garbled.

    I would have expected them to include the original cyrillic name and all the /obvious/ transliterations in their database, but that's apparently way beyond their capabilities.

  28. Re:Not just misspelled, but misspelled *differentl by Nemyst · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Good point highlighting how Slashdot still doesn't support Unicode in 2014 by the way...

  29. Re:More lies from the Republicans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I know that to most of you, Republicans are responsible for everything from circles-that-can't-be-squared to bad breath, but really, I assure you that they didn't invent Muslim nutso bombers.

    You gotta love this rewrite of history. Let's go back to when the Soviet Union was invading Afghanistan shall we...

    It was Saint Ronald Reagan in office who proclaimed those very same people who later did the attacks as "freedom fighters" worthy of illegally diverting funds for arms (look up Iran-Contra Scandal). Every republican loves to trot out that old red herring "Since 9/11 we haven't been attacked again." completely ignoring who was in power on 9/11, the anthrax attacks and the sniper attacks at the time. If the TSA was truly effective, then the underwear bomber, the shoe bomber and yes, even the 9/11 attackers themselves wouldn't have made their way onto those planes to begin with since everyone of them were supposedly on watch lists...

    The TSA is, and always has been, nothing more than security theater. It is 100% reactionary to threats that either were successful or attempted. Someone tries to put explosives in their shoes, we all have to have our shoes off. Someone tries to get explosives in their underpants, we all have to go through invasive searches of our private parts. Someone uses a sharp object to cut the throats of flight personnel, they take away nail clippers because they can be sharp. It is rumored that explosives can be in liquid form so they ban all liquids, even unopened bottled water.

    I will agree with you on one point though, it was a FULL Congress that passed the Homeland Security Act and the Patriot Act. It was the FULL Congress that renewed it too. So in that regard it was both parties that enabled this shit.

  30. Re:Shoulda used Google by TCM · · Score: 2

    Genius!

    Just use a current search engine but with a future database and actch all terrorists! Why didn't anyone think of that?!

    --
    Of course it runs NetBSD. BTC: 1NT7QvbetmANwaMzhpVL6
  31. Re:Shoulda used Google by dave420 · · Score: 2

    Find a time machine, go back to *before* the attacks, and try that again.

  32. Re:Soundex Algorithm by kilfarsnar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But Obummer is keeping you safe!!!

    Most people here understand that the issue of the creeping security state is not left or right, Republican or Democrat. The parties have shown us that they are both interested in increasing surveillance and curtailing our rights. Why have you not grasped this yet?

    --
    "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  33. Re:Who says computers will take over.... by bickerdyke · · Score: 2

    I've been and they scanned and typed quite a lot, so I don't know if they used my data from the machine or human readable zone.

    But then again. It wouldn't be that easy. Your link states that the machine readable zone contains the ICAO transliteration. You may have that, but you can't check for any other transliterations unles you have the original name that you can try various transliteration systems on. Transliteration works like a hash function here: you can't run it backwards to see the original input. Similar, yes, but our whole problem is that "similar" has been missed at least once so far.

    Diving deeper into your links I found that information here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R...

    It seems that the method used for passports and other official documents changed quite frequently: 1997, 2010, 2013. Depending on the year the records were created, different systems may have been in use, leading to this oversight. And they will continue running into that kind of problem until they leave behind that 1970's computer ASCII code and move on to Unicode.

    The rule of thumb that any non-western alphabet belongs to some backward country and can be ignored holds no longer true.

    --
    bickerdyke
  34. Re:Soundex Algorithm by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 2

    True that.

    I still note how the Democrats and Republicans are so divisive, but when it came to the "Military Enabling Act" (I forget it's official name) well, the Dems and Reps got together late on a Friday night and passed a bill that could make a person "not a citizen" based upon suspicions of un-American activity.

    We all get swept up in the rancor of the Dog and Pony show, and behind the scenes, Congress can show quick, bi-partisan coordination. If it helps you and me; then it's going to be controversial. If it empowers them and helps their benefactors -- it happens quickly and without a fight.

    --
    >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
  35. Re:Soundex Algorithm by slapout · · Score: 2

    Indeed. I just tried it with Sql Server:

    Select Soundex('Tsarnaev')

    --returned T265

    Select Soundex('Tsarnayev')

    --returned T265

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  36. Every time you make a mistake by Jezisheck · · Score: 2

    Every time you make a mistake the errorists wins.