Slashdot Mirror


3-D Printed Skull Successfully Implanted In Woman

First time accepted submitter djhaskin987 (2147470) writes "The first successful implantation of a 3-D printed skull has taken place in the Netherlands, according to NBC news: 'Doctors in the Netherlands report that they have for the first time successfully replaced most of a human's skull with a 3-D printed plastic one — and likely saved a woman's life in the process. The 23-hour surgery took place three months ago at University Medical Center Utrecht. The hospital announced details of the groundbreaking operation this week and said the patient, a 22-year-old woman, is doing just fine."

28 of 132 comments (clear)

  1. Sweet by Max+Threshold · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Can I get a bulletproof one?

    1. Re:Sweet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It wouldn't help you much, the impact would still damage your brain even if the bullet did not penetrate.

    2. Re:Sweet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So penetrating brain injury is only slightly less severe than non penetrating. Do you have data for this?

    3. Re:Sweet by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Funny

      It wouldn't help you much, the impact would still damage your brain even if the bullet did not penetrate.

      True, but he could still get a job as a PHP developer.

  2. Can I get one by vikingpower · · Score: 3, Funny

    with eSATA, USB 3.0, FireWire 800, HDMI, DVI, RJ45, RJ11 and Thunderbolt ports ? With a 40-year upgrade plan for future interface types ?

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    1. Re:Can I get one by sexconker · · Score: 4, Insightful

      with eSATA, USB 3.0, FireWire 800, HDMI, DVI, RJ45, RJ11 and Thunderbolt ports ? With a 40-year upgrade plan for future interface types ?

      Terrible choice of ports.

      eSATA is useless when we have USB 3.0. Even if you wanted eSata for some reason, you should have gotten eSATAp
      USB 3.0 is a good choice, but you may as well have listed USB 3.1.
      FireWire? Is this 1996?
      HDMI? Displayport, please.
      DVI? HDMI carries DVI. Again, Displayport, please.
      RJ45 is a jack, not an interface or standard. 10 Gbps or 40 Gbps Ethernet would be a good choice.
      RJ11 is a jack, not an interface or standard. Your Ethernet cable can carry PoTS or VoIP for you.
      Thunderbolt (AKA External PCIe + marketing) is a terrible choice because anyone can just jack in and DMA attack your brain.

    2. Re:Can I get one by pitchpipe · · Score: 2

      with eSATA, USB 3.0, FireWire 800, HDMI, DVI, RJ45, RJ11 and Thunderbolt ports ? With a 40-year upgrade plan for future interface types ?

      FireWire? Is this 1996?

      Firewire is so dead, here's an article talking about how Steve Jobs said Firewire is dead.

      --
      Look where all this talking got us, baby.
    3. Re:Can I get one by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

      Now what makes Jobs the authority on death?

      Oh... right... never mind.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  3. Its transparent.... by tonywestonuk · · Score: 4, Funny

    How cool is that!!! If that was me, I would make sure they didn't put the skin back on, and added a few blue flashing LED's for additional affect.

    1. Re:Its transparent.... by Max+Threshold · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That would be awesome until the first time your brain got sunburned.

    2. Re:Its transparent.... by Lairdykinsmcgee · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sunburnt brain... Now that's a super villain origin story if I ever heard one.

  4. Adamantium by Jesrad · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Do they make them in adamantium yet ?

    --
    Maybe we deserve this world ?
  5. Amazing that this has been done by Kevin+Fishburne · · Score: 2

    The present is looking more and more like Ghost in the Shell. I love it.

    --
    Buy your next Linux PC at eightvirtues.com
  6. Re:Fantastic. by mwvdlee · · Score: 2

    Replacing much smaller and less complicated parts.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  7. Re:Fantastic. by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's not as amazing as it sounds at first. As far as I can tell they didn't try to replace any of the facial skull area. Now THAT would be a feat and a half, considering just how many muscles and nerves are dependent on being on the "right" spot on the skull and being correctly attached, let alone all of our senses. This implant was only for the "brain" part of the skull, i.e. the upper/back half of it. Very important, after all that's what protects our brain, but far less complicated to handle from a medical point of view.

    It's actually less stunning from a medical point of view than from a purely technological one. Operations where the skull cover is removed to ease the pressure on the brain are not so uncommon. What's new now is "merely" that the replacement implant fits far better to the patient, instead of a "one size fits all" that gets shaped and fitted on the OP table, with varying and often limited success, the patient now gets a 100% fitting part.

    That IS a big advancement in medicine. But more for the technical side of medicine, less so for the actual surgical point of view.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  8. Shock waves by dbIII · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's why helmets for cyclists and motorbike riders are not just made of a hard steel shell. Shock waves from fast impacts can pass through a hard material and transmit through something softer, and if they are carrying a lot of energy they can really mess up the softer material.

    1. Re:Shock waves by Wootery · · Score: 4, Informative

      Wrong. In discharging a gun, the bullet is given much more kinetic energy than the gun, due to the disparity in masses. This follows from conservation of momentum, and the definition of kinetic energy.

      This is why an armoured soldier can still be injured through his body armour, despite the armour stopping the bullet, whereas the shooter's shoulder is just fine.

    2. Re:Shock waves by dbIII · · Score: 2

      It's a pressure wave and pressure is force divided by area, so something small moving very fast gives you a lot of pressure in a line from the point of impact into the soft tissue underneath. Something really hard that behaves elasticly, like a thin steel plate, is just going to flex and pass a lot of energy on from where the back edge flexes.

    3. Re:Shock waves by ThatsDrDangerToYou · · Score: 2

      Your brain matter has the same consistency as a bowl of fruit jelly....

      What flavor? Oh, sorry.. What flavour?

    4. Re:Shock waves by Agent0013 · · Score: 2

      But the soldier and his body armor have even more mass than the gun. So I don't really see that your description makes sense. Does the fact that the bullet is accelerated over the length of the barrel make a difference. Upon firing, the bullet is accelerated over 6 inches or so (even longer for a rifle), while on hitting the armor it is stopped in a very short distance.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    5. Re:Shock waves by operagost · · Score: 2

      Ask Hannibal.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  9. The advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Titanium very often contains nickel to harden hit, about 4% of people can get pretty severe allergic reactions over an extended period of time.
    the advantage of composites, is that they're easier and safer to replace with less harm to the soft tissue surrounding it.

  10. Re:Fantastic. by narcc · · Score: 4, Funny

    And what can be less complicated than a bowl??????

    A plate.

  11. Re:Medical grade plastics by Racemaniac · · Score: 2

    "Better to Remain Silent and Be Thought a Fool than to Speak and Remove All Doubt"
    Or in this case: if he doesn't know anything about it, why immediately assume the plastics would be dangerous (and that expert doctors pioneering such a procedure wouldn't think of it)...

    He wouldn't have gotten the angry comment if he had simply asked if the plastic can't give health issues, instead of making a sensationalist comment about it without knowing anything about the subject...

  12. Re:Medical grade plastics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sensationalist or sarcastic? I think you flew off the handle a little too quick there. His comment was harmless, re-read it.

  13. Socialized medicine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The article must be a mistake. The Netherlands has socializes medicine. This sort of innovation only happens in capitalistic healthcare systems.

    1. Re: Socialized medicine by Asha2004 · · Score: 2

      Actually in the Netherlands a lot of hospitals are affiliated to universities. That assures they are interested and willing to invest in unique cases for research purposes. Capitalistic systems are only interested in return on investment.

  14. Re:Ever been shot? by Megol · · Score: 2
    What about this: you bring a .357 magnum revolver and a class IIIA vest to me, you wear the vest and I'll try your hypothesis (that being hit wearing armor "is trivial")?

    A .357 shouldn't penetrate a IIIA vest but the blunt force isn't exactly trivial to handle.