Slashdot Mirror


Edward Snowden and Laura Poitras Win Truth-Telling Award

An anonymous reader writes with news that Snowden has received the Ridenhour Truth-Telling award. From the announcement: "We have selected Edward Snowden and Laura Poitras for their work in exposing the NSA's illegal and unconstitutional bulk collection of the communications of millions of people living in the United States. Their act of courage was undertaken at great personal risk and has sparked a critical and transformative debate about mass surveillance in a country where privacy is considered a constitutional right." The award will be presented at the National Press Club. It is hoped that Snowden and Poitras will be able to appear remotely (Poitras is in effective exile in Berlin). In related news, the ACLU has indexed all publicly released documented leaked by Snowden. You can even full-text search them.

29 of 123 comments (clear)

  1. To tell the truth by smittyoneeach · · Score: 2, Funny

    To tell the truth
    My beard, forsooth
    Craveth proper soap
    E'er since me youth
    Burma Shave

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    1. Re:To tell the truth by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 3, Interesting

      WHY WE WILL NEVER LEARN

      Thomas Polgar, the last CIA station chief in Vietnam, died in March at the age of 92. His obit is in today’s New York Times. And here's Polgar himself, remembering the fall of Saigon. As well as, in this brief aside, the war criminal Henry Kissinger.

      One day I had an opportunity to ask Mr. Kissinger what he thought of our intelligence. Not speaking of Vietnam, but generally. He was getting this big flow of intelligence from CIA world wide at the time. What did he think of the value of it? And he thought for a moment and then he said, "Well, when it supports my policy, it’s very useful." And I think we are here at the heart of the problem. It is that American policy is not formulated in response to what the intelligence shows. We first formulate the policy and then we try to find the intelligence to support it.

      It is interesting to speculate what might have happened if Truman had decided to let the country continue to bumble along, as it had somehow since 1776, without any "intelligence" agency at all. No Shah of Iran, hence no hostage crisis and no Ronald Reagan. No U2, hence no refreezing of the Cold War. No Bay of Pigs, hence no Cuban Missile Crisis. No arming of the Taliban, to teach those Russians a lesson. No Weapons of Mass Destruction, hence no The list goes on and on. The CIA stands in relation to the White House as the drug dealer stands to the addict.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
  2. Re:Which just goes to show by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    *sigh* Yes, yes, we know Obama got a Nobel Peace Price and nobody knows why, can we finally drop it? Everyone knows those things are mostly for show by now anyway.

    What's it got to do with the topic, anyway?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  3. He should get the Nobel Peace Prize by NotDrWho · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It would go a long way towards making up for that embarrassment of giving Obama that award before he had even done anything.

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    1. Re:He should get the Nobel Peace Prize by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Laws need not be just. Neither do they have to be for the benefit of the majority of the population.

      Blind followers of laws have made dictatorships possible throughout the history of humanity. You think either Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia would have been possible without people who would just follow orders and uphold the law?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:He should get the Nobel Peace Prize by NotDrWho · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If Snowden had done the "honorable" thing, he would honorably be buried in a prison right now under an honorable permanent gag order. And the honorable American people would still be completely clueless that the NSA was dishonorably monitoring and archiving every one of our phone calls and emails.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    3. Re:He should get the Nobel Peace Prize by erikkemperman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Snowden could have been honorable

      No. The NSA (and various other TLAs) have shown, again and again, that there the "proper channels" for whistleblowing are dead ends. Nothing will be fixed or improved, and for your troubles you'll be subjected to endless legal and extralegal hardship.

      Snowden apparently knew better than to fall into this trap. I don't think you're actually unaware of this, just trolling. But for others, perhaps, who might be genuinely interested: Thomas Andrews Drake.

      --
      Gosh, thanks. That must be why the other ships call me Meatfucker -- GCU Grey Area (Eccentric)
    4. Re:He should get the Nobel Peace Prize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He's just as much of a 'terrorist' as were the Founding Fathers who struggled to get rid of totalitarian control. He's just as much of a 'traitor' as were Mark Felt when he gave confidential information about Nixon's wiretaps on the DNC HQ to the media.

    5. Re:He should get the Nobel Peace Prize by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      In fact, a lot of what both nations did was illegal under their own laws. People had to be told quietly to break the laws, and these orders were never written down. Of course, the two regimes were different - The New York Times won a Pulitzer Prize for covering up the left-wing regime's genocide.

      "Responding to criticisms that he and Khrushchev did not do enough to expose Stalin's crimes, former first deputy premier Anastas Mikoyan reportedly said: "We couldn't do that because then everyone would have known what scoundrels we were."

      That, too, is the difference between Communism and Nazism: the Communist scoundrels understood who they were because they realised the gulf separating them from the ideals they revered; the Nazis liked being scoundrels - that was their ideal."
      -- Alexander Mekhanik, Rossiyskaya Gazeta

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    6. Re:He should get the Nobel Peace Prize by erikkemperman · · Score: 2

      If not 'proper channels', what did you mean when you said Snowden 'could have been honorable'? He would still have had to flee the country, as it is abundantly clear from cases like Drake's that otherwise nothing much would happen about the issues raised, and it is likely that his personal life would have been wrecked, even worse than it is now.

      The NSA is supposed to protect the US national security. That does emphatically NOT include things like spying on allied heads of state, foreign competitors of US corporations, or the entire population of supposedly friendly nations. In other words, they are operating way, way, way beyond their brief. And the US taxpayers are funding this -- which is why even those revelations are still bona fide whisteblowing, if you ask me.

      --
      Gosh, thanks. That must be why the other ships call me Meatfucker -- GCU Grey Area (Eccentric)
    7. Re:He should get the Nobel Peace Prize by korbulon · · Score: 2

      No. The NSA (and various other TLAs) have shown, again and again, that there the "proper channels" for whistleblowing are dead ends. Nothing will be fixed or improved, and for your troubles you'll be subjected to endless legal and extralegal hardship.

      Yes. The problem with established whistleblower procedures in large institutions (both public and private) is that they act more like honeypots than proper feedback mechanisms which result in the problem being addressed, the perpetrators removed and punished, and the common good being served.

  4. Re:Which just goes to show by NotDrWho · · Score: 3, Interesting

    We are in sad shape when we give awards to traitors.

    Are you talking about Snowden or the many criminals in the NSA and CIA who have won awards over the years?

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
  5. Who knows if it is or isn't... by NormAtHome · · Score: 3, Informative

    Since the Supreme Court refused to rule on the latest challenge http://jurist.org/paperchase/2... we don't know if it is or isn't. In my opinion the original judge who said "that the program is likely unconstitutional" was correct, so the program continues to operate and probably faces years more worth of legal challenges.

  6. Re:Which just goes to show by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ok, sorry for the knee-jerk reaction. Let's try to be more level headed.

    You know what's most astonishing about an award to a "traitor", given by the very same country he "betrayed", really is? That it is given. Think back through history. Can you imagine an award for Julius Rosenberg, given by any kind of US institution? Or let's be less "dramatic", any idea how a criminal of any kind would be given an award by his own country?

    Can you imagine what kind of support for a "crime" it takes that the "criminal" gets an award for it? And we're not talking about a spy having backing in the country he spies from. That the Rosenbergs were seen as heroes in the USSR is a given. But we're talking about support for what he has done, without a doubt against the interests of the US government, and the support that he gets for it within the US.

    That alone tells me more about the US government and how well the US people feel represented by said government than about the "criminal".

    A government should represent its people, and the will of the people. That's the only reason, the only right, a government has to exist if it is supposed to be just and justified. If a government does not do that and instead prosecutes someone who does actually execute what is identified as the will of the people, then I have to admit it is kinda hard to tell for me who is the criminal here, the whistleblower or the government.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  7. Re:Which just goes to show by Chrisq · · Score: 2

    that lying is the norm.

    I told you before Yoda, leave poor Norm alone

  8. Re:Which just goes to show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't know who Snowden betrayed, but as an American, he certainly didn't betray me. However, those supporting the NSA's disgusting activities certainly are betraying the American people.

  9. Re:the "What" award? by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    It's not that hard to punch that into Wikipedia, is it?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  10. exile? by Rich_Lather · · Score: 2

    Exiles my arse. Poitras and Applebaum engage in self promotion by giving themselves the artificial "street cred" of self-declared exiles. Oh how hard it must be to blog from Berlin coffee shops while on the lam from the evil US government.

  11. Re:Which just goes to show by Sique · · Score: 2

    We are in a sad shape when the whole population of the own country is considered "the enemy". And only then "helping and abedding the enemy" is a valid accusation. If you think otherwise, then any published news would be treason, because each news also helps the enemy.

    --
    .sig: Sique *sigh*
  12. Re:Which just goes to show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The NSA spying on the rest of the world IS DOING THIER FUCKING JOB.

    Snowden did not betray me by telling the world of the NSA's immoral spying. If those activities are part of their job, then their job is immoral, and I'm happy he gave us the specifics.

    We should not be doing this to innocent people or allies.

    If you're too naive to understand how politics work and think that our 'allies' aren't trying to do the same then you're just ignorant and small-minded

    Why do you complete morons always assume that people like me think that no one else is doing this sort of thing? Rather, it's not that I think no one else is doing it, *I don't care*. That justifies *nothing*.

    No doubt, they did break the law (constitution), but that doesn't justify releasing all the other crap that was ENTIRELY LEGAL AND WHAT THEY WERE SUPPOSED TO BE DOING.

    What is legal is not always right. What is illegal is not always wrong.

    In this case, I'd say their supposedly legal activities were wrong.

    That made him a traitor.

    Not in my eyes.

    Thanks, Snowden.

  13. Re:Which just goes to show by lonOtter · · Score: 2

    The same? Maybe not. But at this point, anyone staying at the NSA is immoral. Ignorance is no longer an excuse, because the ignorance that these things are happening does not exist.

    --
    [End Of Line]
  14. Re:Which just goes to show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The NSA spying on the rest of the world IS DOING THIER FUCKING JOB.

    Stop repeating things that aren't true. Unless that country is actively at war with the US, then no. The NSA's espionage and computer fraud (writing malware, sabotaging systems, leaving other vulnerabilities that can be abused by anyone) are an illegal act of aggression and breaks our treaties. Might I remind you that not too long ago, the very same president that is supporting the NSA right now had also called out China for illegal hacking and himself called it an "act of war."

    This kind of bullshit being posted here just goes to show that shilling wins. I can't believe this kind of mindset has actually taken foot here.

  15. Re:Which just goes to show by serviscope_minor · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Its amazing how you can't distinguish between an organization and the people in it.

    Organisations are like soylent green: made of people. If "the NSA" is doing bad stuff that means people in the NSA were doing bad stuff.

    not everyone at the NSA is the same.

    Quite so. They have recently had at least one good, honourable person in they employ: Edward Snowden. That proves that not everyone at the NSA is necessarily bad.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  16. I have never seen a right to privacy in the US by oscrivellodds · · Score: 2

    Constitution. If it were there, we would not be having the problems we are currently having.

  17. Re:Which just goes to show by korbulon · · Score: 2

    It's funny how shrill some people get when exclaiming Snowden as a traitor, but how *very quiet* these same people are when mentioning that the US gubmint has not only violated the public trust, but also the constitution of the United States, that legal bedrock on which rests all the laws of the land - like it ain't no thing.

    Yeah, but Snowden: let's focus on him.

  18. Re:Which just goes to show by korbulon · · Score: 2

    You're a moron.

    You've just told us that you think the janitors at the NSA are as responsible as people like Snowden himself ... who you know ... HELPED TO ACTUALLY IMPLEMENT THIS SHIT IN THE FIRST PLACE.

    Jesus christ, you want so hard to hate the NSA that logical and thought go right out the window.

    GO HOME NSA YOU ARE DRUNK.

  19. Re:Which just goes to show by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

    You've just told us that you think the janitors at the NSA are as responsible as people like Snowden himself

    No I didn't. I merely pointed out that the presence of Snowden proves beyond doubt that good people are or have worked at the NSA.

    Jesus christ, you want so hard to hate the NSA that logical and thought go right out the window.

    No, honestly I just like winding you up because you're a nutter.

    It is funny though that Snowden (who you hate so much) proves the point (that you love so much) about having good people at the NSA.

    trolololololol

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  20. Re:Which just goes to show by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 2

    I'm a US Citizen. I can assure you that Snowden did the exact opposite of acting as a traitor. I'm assuming you are also a US Citizen. You, however, have shown yourself incapable of determining the difference between treason and patriotism.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  21. Re:Which just goes to show by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 2

    You mean like when we gave the White House to Dick Cheney after exposing our secret agent and her informants, thus rendering America blind in Iran's WMD programs?
    VERY selective outrage there!