Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Gary Kildall, Father of the PC OS, Finally Gets His Due

Posted by Soulskill on from the not-a-moment-too-soon dept.

theodp writes: "GeekWire reports that Gary Kildall, the creator of the landmark personal computer operating system CP/M, will be recognized posthumously by the IEEE for that contribution, in addition to his invention of BIOS, with a rare IEEE Milestone plaque. Kildall, who passed away in 1994 at the age of 52, has been called the man who could have been Bill Gates. But according to Kildall's son, his dad wasn't actually interested in being what Bill Gates became: 'He was a real inventor,' said Scott Kildall. 'He was much more interested in creating new ideas and bringing them to the world, rather than being the one that was bringing them to market and leveraging a huge amount of profits. He was such a kind human being. He was always sharing his ideas, and would sit down with people and show flowcharts of what he was thinking. I think if he were around for the open-source movement, he would be such a huge proponent of it.' Techies of a certain age will also remember Gary's work as a co-host of Computer Chronicles."

61 of 99 comments (clear)

  1. He couldn't have been Bill Gates... by Kenja · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It wasn't about the creation, but the leveraging.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:He couldn't have been Bill Gates... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This. Gates was ruthless from the get-go, the kid read multiple biographies of Napolean for chrissakes. He read biographies of people like JP Morgan, back when you couldn't even find them without trekking to a major university library.

      If Kildall had struck an exclusive deal with IBM, he would've probably made a few tens of millions USD before retiring or being out-maneuvered by businessmen of Gates' caliber.

    2. Re:He couldn't have been Bill Gates... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      And a few millions USD is an immense amount of success!

  2. The best recognition.. by ThatsDrDangerToYou · · Score: 5, Insightful
    is this: " He was such a kind human being. He was always sharing his ideas, and would sit down with people and show flowcharts of what he was thinking."

    We could use more like him. To be recognized by IEEE is great, but greater still to leave this legacy to his kids and the community.

    1. Re:The best recognition.. by sg_oneill · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yeah, I think its wrong to put him in the Jobs, or Gates category. Jobs and Gates where merely better than average technical people but with phenomenal business skills. Kildall was only a better than average businessman but with phenomenal technical skills.

      In a sense he was more a Wozniak character, well meaning, technically brilliant, and for a while at least betting on the right horse.

      And by all accounts, a genuinely decent person.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    2. Re:The best recognition.. by JabberWokky · · Score: 5, Interesting

      To tie them all together, I used a computer for many years that was designed by Woz, marketed by Jobs, with a expanded processor and memory made by Gates' company to run Kildall's OS (and a few others). An Apple ][+ with the Microsoft Z-80 SoftCard card, running CP/M. And I'm sure I wasn't the only one. A world capable of inventing, manufacturing, and garnering capital and sales to see that innovation become available to people requires all of them.

      I know I'd rather have lunch with the likes of Wozniak and Kildall, however. Add Ritchie and Kernighan, and that would be one heck of a table.

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    3. Re:The best recognition.. by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

      Wait, there are non-evil flowcharts? What an eye-opener.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    4. Re:The best recognition.. by LDAPMAN · · Score: 1

      Thats same machine is responsible for all the success I've had in my career as a technologist. It was outrageously expensive at the time but parents say it's the best investment they ever made.

    5. Re:The best recognition.. by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      I don't see any evidence that Kildall was a better than average businessman. In fact, the evidence is that he was quite a poor business man.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    6. Re:The best recognition.. by theodp · · Score: 2, Informative

      From the linked BW article: "Kildall ultimately sold his company to Novell Inc. (NOVL) in 1991 for $120 million." Not BillG money, but not too shabby.

    7. Re:The best recognition.. by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      Uh NO. Fuck Gary and his idiotic 8.3 filename convention -- it set computing back 20 years.

      My old Apple DOS 3.3 filesystem had 30 character filenames WITH spaces in it.
      ProDOS had even 15-character filenames and directories.

      CP/M was total shit.

    8. Re:The best recognition.. by sg_oneill · · Score: 1

      I don't see any evidence that Kildall was a better than average businessman. In fact, the evidence is that he was quite a poor business man.

      He was actually fantastic, and made serious coin doing something people actually originally thought impossible, writing software.

      Unfortunately he just wasn't shrewd enough to face down Bill Gates, possibly the most talented businessman of the last 50 years. But I doubt many else could either. Bill even managed to wipe the floor with Jobs (You'll note when Jobs finally did take Apple into the stratosphere with the ipod+iphone, Gates was more or less on his way out.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    9. Re:The best recognition.. by ThatsDrDangerToYou · · Score: 1

      Wait, there are non-evil flowcharts? What an eye-opener.

      Oh right? What was I thinking? I don't know anything about CP/M, but I do know that flowcharts are the purest evil. Unless there are doughnuts. Did the man know his doughnuts?

  3. I met Gary by Coditor · · Score: 2

    as a guest on Computer Chronicles in 1987. He seemed like a genuine person, not at all affected by not being Bill. Good to see he finally gets better recognition even if it took so long.

    1. Re: I met Gary by Kalriath · · Score: 2

      Your post is a bunch of crap. Forensic computer scientists looked at the MS-DOS source code and compared it to CP/M code back during the Digital Research trial and verified that it was not stolen. And your rant about that second grade university student (second grade? WTF?) is obviously a pile of shit.

      I know it's trendy to hate Microsoft (Old Microsoft, not to be confused with New Microsoft), but you can do it with actual facts instead of made up bullshit.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    2. Re: I met Gary by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Straight out of alt.conspiracy.jfk, and other similar newsgroups.

      Thanks for the entertaining read.

      --
      File under 'M' for 'Manic ranting'
    3. Re: I met Gary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      First of all, you are off-topic.

      Secondly, MS is dead. Nobody gives a rat's ass about MS anymore. The big scary, and potentially much more dangerous, companies these days are FB, Google and Apple. So yeah, 90's called and they need their "hate the MS" thing back.

    4. Re: I met Gary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      OMG that was an amazing list of lies and half truths and bullshit.

      There is one reason MS is where it is today. *WE* put them there. We demanded it because they were the cheaper solution. Before MS put TCPIP in windows 98 you paid for it (in some cases as much as the OS itself). Take for example OS/2 (of which MS contributed large amounts to). If you wanted a TCP/IP stack for it from IBM you paid upwards of 30k per box. The bundling of IE was not a matter of 'oh should they'. It was a matter of everyone saying 'why havent you yet' except people who liked the crash fest of netscape.

      They were the cheap solution. The reason Apple got its lunch ate by MS was because of cost to develop. I worked in 3 shops that did both MS and Mac software. Outfit 1 mac dev would set you back ~20-30k with some yearly costs thrown in for good measure. Outfit a PC dev, maybe 3k-4k if you bought them a really really nice rig. Apple finally got the idea and charged parts of their dev kit 0 and other parts 100 bucks a year. I can buy an Apple dev kit for 10 years to recoupe one cycle of visual studio now. Notice how they crushed the pad market?

      MS was the *cheap* solution that worked 'good enough'. They are now the expensive solution in relation to everyone else which is why their market share is imploding.

    5. Re: I met Gary by jedidiah · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The cheap solution was the rest of the market beyond Apple and IBM. It wasn't the platform with the IBM trademark associated with it. The PC initially exploited it's association with the original IBM product and then Bill Gates and Microsoft ran with it from there once they already had commanding position in the market due to someone else's trademark.

      Microsoft is ultimately the extension of someone else's monopoly.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    6. Re: I met Gary by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      To think, that'a probably the most intelligible part of that verbal diatribe.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    7. Re: I met Gary by AaronW · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually OS/2 WARP and even 2.1 included TCP/IP. The OS/2 Warp TCP/IP suite was far better than anything Microsoft had. It was basically based on BSD along with many of the tools that were supplied. I remember buying NFS for OS/2 (there were versions from IBM and Hummingbird) as well as X11 for OS/2 (before XFree86 was ported to it). Later versions of OS/2 included even more features from BSD, including sendmail and the firewall support. I remember being able to telnet into my OS/2 box long before such things were supported by Microsoft. When OS/2 Warp shipped, TCP/IP was an add-on for Windows 95.

      TCP/IP was never a 20-30K option at least from version 2.1 and later.

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    8. Re: I met Gary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > Before MS put TCPIP in windows 98 you paid for it (in some cases as much as the OS itself). Take for example OS/2 (of which MS contributed large amounts to). If you wanted a TCP/IP stack for it from IBM you paid upwards of 30k per box.

      That is complete nonsense. Trumpet Winsock was available for Windows 3.x as inexpensive shareware. Apparently most used it for free but you can rectify that at http://thanksfortrumpetwinsock.com/

      Windows 95 had TCP/IP, initially in the Plus! pack (which was usually installed by OEMs) but also in OSR1. With the initial Win95 the TCP/IP stack could be downloaded for free from Microsoft.

      """The software is available on the Internet via anonymous FTP from ftp.microsoft.com in the file /peropsys/Win_News/Windows95Information/InternetExplorer/msie20.exe or via the Web at http://www.microsoft.com/ie/ie.htm. After downloading msie20.exe run it on the Windows 95 system. It is a self-exploding file that automatically installs the new software. One note: the "20" in the filename msie20.exe is a version number. This will change with time. When you download the file it could have a slightly different name. """

      OS/2 Warp (3.0) had TCP/IP included (though not necessarily automatically installed). The 'Bonus Pack' added TCP/IP to OS/2 version 2 and didn't cost "30k".

      > OS/2 (of which MS contributed large amounts to)

      MS did not 'contribute'. IBM _paid_ Microsoft. In fact MS took (stole) IBM's code that switched between protected mode and real mode and put it in Windows to make Windows-286 usable.

    9. Re: I met Gary by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      The open architecture of the IBM PC was what made it a success. Virtually everything else was more closed. I mean, IBM published the commented ASM source code for the PC BIOS in the Techref Manual that anybody could buy. They used only common off the shelf chips. Once the cloners started duplicating the design (after enough people wrote clone BIOSes) there was no turning back.

      You're right, though, that the cheap alternative was the cheap plastic junk with 8 bit processors, and proprietary ASICs that consumers could buy in department stores.

    10. Re: I met Gary by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 1

      The open architecture of the IBM PC was what made it a success. Virtually everything else was more closed.

      Say what? Every micro of the era came with schematics!

      --
      Mostly random stuff.
    11. Re: I met Gary by tragedy · · Score: 1

      We demanded it because they were the cheaper solution. Before MS put TCPIP in windows 98 you paid for it (in some cases as much as the OS itself).

      Or you used an OS that wasn't missing critical network functionality like Linux.

    12. Re:I met Gary by antdude · · Score: 1

      Which episode and story were you in CC? I loved watching that show. Matt Chat had a interview with Stewart recently that I mentioned in my /. post: http://tech.slashdot.org/comme... ... :)

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    13. Re: I met Gary by lissnup · · Score: 1

      The cheap solution was the rest of the market beyond Apple and IBM..

      Yes, and everyone seems to have forgotten Compaq etc

    14. Re: I met Gary by gzuckier · · Score: 1
      The US public always ends up with the worse technology, apparently voluntarily

      DOS vs CPM

      Windows vs OS2

      PC vs Apple

      VHS vs Beta

      44 khz CD vs SACD

      NTSC vs PAL

      18 khz subcarrier FM vs discrete stereo

      jpg vs png

      mp3 vs FLAC or ALAC

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  4. Open Source by brit74 · · Score: 2

    "Kildall, who passed away in 1994 ... I think if he were around for the open-source movement, he would be such a huge proponent of it."

    Doesn't the open-source movement go back to the 1970s? Admittedly, I'm not sure how easy it would be to get involved with open-source projects (other than open-sourcing your own private projects) before the age of the internet.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O...

    1. Re:Open Source by sjames · · Score: 1

      It was hard enough in the '90 from across town. It took me over a week and that was only because a kindly sysop granted an exception to the ul:dl ratio.

    2. Re:Open Source by jgotts · · Score: 1

      1994 was the year I first installed Linux. By that point, there were a number of complete Linux distributions. I got my start with Slackware 2.0.

      So he was definitely around for the open source movement, so to speak. It was off most peoples' radar screens in 1994. This site got its start in 1997. I think I joined in 1998.

    3. Re:Open Source by lissnup · · Score: 1

      "Kildall, who passed away in 1994 ... I think if he were around for the open-source movement, he would be such a huge proponent of it."

      Doesn't the open-source movement go back to the 1970s?

      In the '80s, I recall myself and others being more focused on initiatives for Open Systems Interoperability and Connectivity.

  5. Award by Obijon70 · · Score: 1

    IMO, CP/M should get him the award, not even considering BIOS...

    1. Re:Award by TheRealHocusLocus · · Score: 2

      IMO, CP/M should get him the award, not even considering BIOS...

      While Tandy TRS-DOS was my first OS, CP/M on Vector Graphic, Kaypro and Televideo systems was the first one I dove into. In the BDOS I could disassemble memory to instructions and actually figure out what was going on. CP/M was the 8-bit bread and butter of the 8080/Z80 age.

      In 1980 at age 16 I wrote a proof of concept product, a TSR (terminate and stay resident') program for CP/M systems called DataCrypt. You'd load it on startup and be prompted for a pass phrase and it would hash the phrase, tuck itself into ~2k above your COMMAND.COM and terminate-resident, intercepting file I/O. When any running program created or opened a file matching one of several (user-settable) wildcard patterns such as $$??????.???, it would perform transparent crypt or de-crypt of each 128-byte sector.

      So with DataCrypt resident you could use WordStar and work with a mix of encrypted and unencrypted documents. If the program used your primary name with a special extension (like *.$$$) for temporary files even those would be encrypted on disk.

      I sent it out to several folks in Silicon Valley and elsewhere for review but got no bites. At the time there were few computer folk as interested in data security as I was. But even then I was aware that TRUE security was a long distance away. The prototype's CRC32/XOR snake oil encryption had only 32 bits of entropy, which is a wink and a chuckle these days. True DES encryption would have been a slow deal.

      --
      <blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>
  6. He was around for the open source movement, innit? by CRCulver · · Score: 2

    While the "open source as something different than Free Software" debate may have exploded in the 1990s after his death, the fellow was around for the many years of GNU and BSD activity and publicity. Did he have any published views on that?

  7. When popularity rules by hessian · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Democracy, markets and social groups all recognize one factor: popularity.

    When popularity rules, engineering comes second. What matters is making a product that many people think they need.

    Gates isn't even a huge offender here. He accomplished something great: he made a company to standardize computing.

    Thanks to him, we have standard hardware, file formats, disk drives, etc. enabling a lot of things including Linux.

    --
    Futurist Traditionalism
    1. Re:When popularity rules by zephvark · · Score: 3, Funny

      I smell a troll

      Take a shower.

  8. About time by stox · · Score: 1

    Gary's contributions in the early days of microcomputing were very significant. Few have contributed nearly as much.

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
  9. Re:Sure he contributed a lot... by westlake · · Score: 1

    and a rival company claims he ignored the IBM reps and 'went flying'. Its not true, but Gates claims that it is.

    IBM went to Microsoft and Gates for an operating system and programming languages for their new micro --- and Gates sent them on to Kildall.

    Various reasons have been given for the two companies failing to reach an agreement. DRI, which had only a few products, might have been unwilling to sell its main product to IBM for a one-time payment rather than its usual royalty-based plan. orothy might have believed that the company could not deliver CP/M-86 on IBM's proposed schedule, as the company was busy developing an implementation of the PL/I programming language for Data General. Or, the IBM representatives might have been annoyed that DRI had spent hours on what they considered a routine formality [a non disclosure agreement.

    Kildall obtained a copy of PC DOS, examined it, and concluded that it infringed on CP/M. When he asked Gerry Davis what legal options were available, Davis told him that intellectual property law for software was not clear enough to sue. Instead Kildall only threatened IBM with legal action, and IBM responded with a proposal to offer CP/M-86 as an option for the PC in return for a release of liability. Kildall accepted, believing that IBM's new system (like its previous personal computers) would not be a significant commercial success. When the IBM PC was introduced, IBM sold its operating system as an unbundled option. One of the operating system options was PC DOS, priced at US$40. PC DOS was seen as a practically necessary option; most software titles required it and without it the IBM PC was limited to it's built-in Cassette Basic. CP/M-86 shipped a few months later at $240, but sold poorly against DOS and enjoyed far less software support.

    Gary Kildall

    CP/M-86 was cut-priced down to $60 by 1983. Too late,

  10. I remember him for GEM by DadLeopard · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The GEM Graphic environment manager, would have been the world standard, well expect for the "Look and Feel" Lawsuit that Apple brought against it when it was released for the IBM PC and Clones. After the settlement it was so neutered as to be fairly useless! It was a dream to use in it's full implementation on the Atari 1040ST. Drag and drop and a windowed environment way before Microsoft got around to it!

    1. Re:I remember him for GEM by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 2

      Apple sued all the early GUI interfaces out of business. You might even say they caused Microsoft's success with Windows, by clearing the field for them.

  11. well, he said it was a weekend hack by samantha · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I met him back in the 70s. He said that CP/M was something he hacked up one weekend out of frustration with other things available at the time or rather the dearth of much of anything. He wasn't at all impressed by having done so. He wondered why people thought it was a big deal.

    So sorry to hear that we lost him and so very young.

  12. Re:Computer Chronicles by captjc · · Score: 2

    The entire series was donated to The Internet Archive I find it awesome watching the old episodes to see how far we came. Seeing laptops that boast about a fantastic battery life of 2 hours with an *OMG* color screen or seeing a Panasonic rep saying about how the 3DO will kill Nintendo is a great nostalgia trip.

    --
    Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 1 hour, 47 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment
  13. Eternal September by hessian · · Score: 1

    I smell a troll

    Pre-Eternal September:

    "Oh look, an outlier opinion. It's either genius or not worth commenting on."

    Post-Eternal September:

    "Someone who disagrees with me. I need to call him a corporate shill, a troll, a pedophile or a racist and then I've won this debate in my own mind and social group."

    --
    Futurist Traditionalism
  14. "a certain age," eh? by dre80 · · Score: 1

    Aaannnndd that marks the first time I feel targeted by the phrase "of a certain age." You insensitive clod.

  15. Re:Hell... by sjames · · Score: 2

    If it was only a couple meg, you were missing most of the distro. No wonder you thought it was a POS.

  16. My memories of Digital Research by John+Jorsett · · Score: 1

    A Navy laboratory project I was on wanted to buy the source code to MSDOS for a project where we needed to make some custom mods. Digital Research said they were interested, but their lawyers made it living hell. Somehow the Navy lawyers and DR's lawyers finally hammered out an agreement (I remember one of the provisions was that we would never, ever, EVER tell anyone that they had sold the code to us), but it took so many months that we had by then written most of what we needed from scratch, so we decided it was better to just finish that rather than spend whatever ungodly sum they had finally agreed to and still end up having to write the custom code for that.

  17. Could have been Bill Gates? by jcr · · Score: 2

    More like, the first guy in a long line that Bill Gates ripped off.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  18. Re:Nice guys by tragedy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Wozniak did not ride Steve Jobs coattails. Do you think jobs would have gotten anywhere without Woz at the beginning? He probably would have ended up as a used car salesman.

  19. Re:Hell... by tragedy · · Score: 1

    That's what cheapbytes.com was great for, back in the days of dialup. You could order a CD and have it delivered faster than downloading the contents. I just went to see if their site was still there. It doesn't seem to be coming up.

  20. Re:Value beyond description by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    you have no idea what the internet is, do you?

  21. Re:Nice guys by Archtech · · Score: 2

    I think you may have misunderstood the parent's assertion. I think he meant that Wozniak owed whatever wealth and business success he achieved to riding Jobs' coattails.

    Ironically, I completely agree with your remark that, without Wozniak, Jobs "probably would have ended up as a used car salesman". (Although even then, he probably would have wound up a billionaire). Unfortunately, due to the way our society is structured, it is NOT the geniuses who are rewarded but the people, like Jobs, who exploit their ideas.

    --
    I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
  22. Re:Hell... by sjames · · Score: 1

    It looks like they just went poof. Their domain is still registered but DNS seems to be down.

    The BBB says they are believed to be shut down.

  23. Kildall was amazing; Chuck Moore & others too by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

    http://www.businessweek.com/st...
    http://www.groklaw.net/article...
    http://www.basicallytech.com/b...
    http://www.digitalresearch.biz...
    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...
    "The PC world might have looked very different today had Kildall's Digital Research prevailed as the operating system of choice for personal computers. DRI offered manufacturers the same low-cost licensing model which Bill Gates is today credited with inventing by sloppy journalists - only with far superior technology. DRI's roadmap showed a smooth migration to reliable multi-tasking, and in GEM, a portable graphical environment which would undoubtedly have brought the GUI to the low-cost PC desktop years before Microsoft's Windows finally emerged as a standard. But then Kildall was motivated by technical excellence, not by the need to dominate his fellow man."

    Yet, consider what came from Chuck Moore of pre-Bayh-Dole true academic traditions of MIT & Stanford and then internal support in manufacturing and then supporting government-funded Astronomical research:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C...
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F...
    http://www.colorforth.com/HOPL...
    "NRAO, 1971 ... NRAO appreciated what I had wrought. They had an arrangement with a consulting firm to identify spin-off technology. The issue of patenting Forth was discussed at length. But since software patents were controversial and might involve the Supreme Court, NRAO declined to pursue the matter. Whereupon, rights reverted to me. I don't think ideas should be patentable. Hindsight agrees that Forth's only chance lay in the public domain. Where it has flourished."

    Forth still can be a great BIOS and command line system.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O...

    Although IBM deserves credit for popularizing the VM idea with System 360 and then VM.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S...
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V...

    Smalltalk by Alan Kay and Dan Ingalls and others was a another great option.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D...

    Kildall, Moore, and Kay/Ingalls all got the idea of virtual machines (with their own ways). Lisp-ers may have got a bit of that too.

    We had choices as a society. I saw some of them first hand in the 1970s and 1980s when I started in computing. I bought Forth cartridges for the Commodore VIC and C64. I worked very briefly on a computer with CP/M (although using Forth on it though). The OS choice pushed by the person born with a million dollar trust fund who "dumpster dived" for OS listings won (who did little of the development work himself) -- with an empire built on QDOS which has shaky legal standing as a clone of CP/M which is probably why IBM did not buy it itself. And we were the worse for it as a society IMHO.
    http://philip.greenspun.com/bg...
    http://www.complex.com/tech/20...

    But that problematical path would not have been possible without political and legal decisions to base the development of computing around the idea of "artificial scarcity" via copyright

    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
  24. Matt Chat's Interviews With Stewart Cheifet! by antdude · · Score: 1

    3/Three Long Parts:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...

    They talked about Gary briefly. I don't re(member/call) which one(s) had that discussion. Just watch/listen to all of them if you were a fan of Computer Chronicles like me. ;)

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  25. Re:Hell... by tragedy · · Score: 1

    It's a pity for nostalgic reasons, but not really unexpected. They had a great service back when network bandwidth was hard to come by.

  26. Re:Nice guys by tragedy · · Score: 2

    Woz probably still would have managed some sort of success without Jobs. As for Jobs, I'm not so sure he would be a billionaire otherwise. Jobs was very good at the position he was in, but he was very fortunate. Personalities like his are much, much more likely to self-destruct than succeed.

  27. Photographs of Kildall plaque dedication by Lazowska · · Score: 1

    Some photographs of Friday's dedication of the Kildall plaque in Pacific Grove CA are here: http://news.cs.washington.edu/...

  28. Re:Hell... by sjames · · Score: 1

    Yeah, fast internet pretty well eliminated their reason to be. I have a few CDs from them on my shelf. I keep them around as a curiosity.

  29. Re:Nice guys by Archtech · · Score: 1

    Yes, it's kind of a very lucky virtuous circle that leads to great wealth and success. You need Woz (the brains), but without Jobs (the huckster) Woz would, at best, get a decently paid job working for some corporation. Likewise, Jobs on his own couldn't strike it rich without some big breakthrough that comes only from a technical guy like Woz. So they both need each other; but when the alchemy happens and the money rains down, 99.99% of it sticks to the huckster.

    --
    I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
  30. Gary was always very helpful by wiz0690 · · Score: 1

    I remember having a problem getting an 8" floppy drive in work properly with CP/M and called Digital Research for support. Gary answered the phone himself and we proceeded to work out the solution in under a half hour. It was a rather trivial timing error. During the conversation I found out he was in his kitchen cooking lunch. Gary would go out of his way to make sure his customers were happy.

    --
    /steve