Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Which VHS Player To Buy?

stkpogo (799773) writes "I have several old VHS tapes that I'd like to digitize but my old VHS machine died years ago. What's a good VHS player to get so I can make nice clean digital videos from my old tapes before they're gone? I have a few TV -> USB adapters." How would you go about this, especially with tapes (like old home movies) you might be worried about sticking into a low-end VCR? And with what number of tapes does it make sense to outsource the digitizing?

42 of 201 comments (clear)

  1. I remember my first VHS player by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 5, Funny

    It was like my first first post.

    1. Re:I remember my first VHS player by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      It was like my first first post.

      As in, sort of neat but ultimately of little value, right?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  2. Bees knees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Buy a broadcast-quality Sony player from eBay.

    BTW remember to retension the tapes, which means to rewind the tape, then wind it to the end of the reel, then rewind it again.

    1. Re:Bees knees by arth1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Buy a broadcast-quality Sony player from eBay.

      "Broadcast quality" Sony players run Beta, not VHS.

    2. Re:Bees knees by unitron · · Score: 2

      Sony developed Beta, but manufactured both formats for the consumer market.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    3. Re:Bees knees by RecycledElectrons · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, rewinding (is a player that rewinds softly, not in one that just maxes the voltage to the motor) then playing, then rewinding again is a VERY GOOD IDEA.

      Also, not all players are created equal. With some tapes, you want a high-end player, with others, you want a player that can follow the tape's errant tracking WAY OUT OF BOUNDS.

      I go to a GoodWill store, buy 4-5 decent looking VCRs, exchange the 2 that don't work, and try the same tape in all of them. You will find different tapes work better in different VCRs.

  3. Do the math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And with what number of tapes does it make sense to outsource the digitizing?

    evaluate the cost of a vcr and the amount of time you have to transfer, I cannot provide a value to your time then compare it to the cost of outsourcing and make choice.

    1. Re:Do the math by damn_registrars · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That, exactly. I can't really imagine how it could be worth your time and effort to do it yourself, unless you have VHS tapes that have material on them that you don't want a third party to see. Send your tapes to someone else to have them transfered to DVD and spend the extra time you just bought yourself doing something enjoyable.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    2. Re:Do the math by damn_registrars · · Score: 2

      You can criticize DVD all you want, but it is more lines of resolution than VHS. Now, some transfers are better than others, so one would be wise to look around before committing to let someone do the transfer for them.

      And while DVD may be a format approaching obsolescence (at least on the market), there are so many readers out there - and it is trivial to rip DVD to a file on your computer so you have another copy - that it is likely the most portable in the long-term sense.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    3. Re:Do the math by nospam007 · · Score: 2

      "That, exactly. I can't really imagine how it could be worth your time and effort to do it yourself, unless you have VHS tapes that have material on them that you don't want a third party to see. Send your tapes to someone else to have them transfered to DVD and spend the extra time you just bought yourself doing something enjoyable."

      Exactly! Where I live, we have an audiovisual document center where all that stuff is archived for the community.
      They digitize any analog materiel, even for free if you give them a copy of stuff that's relevant for the community, like if you happen to have recorded anything historically relevant, like a concert, a speech, a jubilee, a parade, an inauguration etc.
      Lots of people are now inheriting boxes of super8 tapes where nobody knows what's on them.
      I'm sure there's something similar in the US.

    4. Re:Do the math by Blaskowicz · · Score: 2

      I still watch divx/xvid, and the worst thing is the 128Kbit/s MP3 sound. Sometimes sligtly better, 128K AAC.
      I hope a streaming/download service will comes up that satisfies my needs.. I want low bitrate, low res video and high btirate stereo sound!

      DVD is high bitrate and low res. Yes, the codec is old but with the max legal video birate you can afford with stereo or mono 48KHz sound, I'm sure it can look okay.

      Oh, I guess you have a too big TV with too much processing enabled. I suppose that if you don't disable all that crap you're looking at upscaled macroblocks run through a sharpen filter. I remember seeing first a Blu Ray demo in store, there was a lot of sharpen and the Blu Ray was maybe MPEG2.. Yes, it looked like crap. Really total crap.

      I am very concerned about the sound. The VCR has to be good at extracting the sound signal from old home tapes, sound must be degraded and muffled already. Then the recording of footage on a PC has to be done by someone who is not a complete idiot, with volume levels, gain set up accordingly, and not using a noisy sound input like the one on a random old motherboard.

    5. Re:Do the math by Miamicanes · · Score: 2

      The biggest problem with most VHS-to-DVD transfers is inadequate sample resolution or encoding bitrate. VHS is low-res... but it's also noisy, and noise compresses badly. Encoding captured VHS video in a way that preserves it EXACTLY the way it was read from the VCR (preserving higher-order information like chroma shift and luminance noise) so it can be further restored later requires a MINIMUM 704x480 resolution and 6-8mbps bitrate. In English, that basically means you'll get about an hour of high-quality captured video from VHS on a single-layer DVD. Two hours might be do-able at good quality if you're digitizing 24fps content, but a straight VHS capture encoded to 4mbps or lower is probably going to look worse than the original from the tape did.

      A good way to think about it is to envision taking a photograph of an early-80s videogame's CRT display. The nominal resolution of the game might have only been something like 320x200 or 256x192, but other factors like the electron gun alignment, mask pitch, bleed, bloom, etc enter into the equation as well. If your goal is to just capture an approximation of the display, you could resample it down to its nominal resolution... but if your goal is to preserve every nuance of the video's appearance as it appeared on the CRT (so you can literally emulate things like CRT alignment bleed and color halos on a 2560x1440 LCD), your photograph of the CRT will have to be MUCH higher resolution than its nominal resolution.

  4. Panasonic AG1980P by tetatdo · · Score: 4, Informative

    I am working on a similar project with old VHS movie, if you can pick up a SVHS deck, that will help. Anything prosumer is good too. I just picked up 2 Panasonic AG1980P and that is supposed to be one of the better decks for such a purpose. I found them on goodwill's website! Hopefully they work. These have TBCs (time based correctors) which are supposed to correct issues with the picture due to damaged or old tapes, etc.

    1. Re:Panasonic AG1980P by Bitmanhome · · Score: 4, Informative

      Be sure to test every tape with the TBC on and off. I've noticed a hint of pixelation with it on, and the dynamic range seems to be a bit narrower too. I believe you should leave TBC off as much as possible as long as your capture device likes the signal.

      --
      Not that this wasn't entirely predictable.
    2. Re:Panasonic AG1980P by microcars · · Score: 4, Informative

      These are excellent machines that will play back just about any VHS tape you can throw at them.
      I am looking at 5 of them across the room from me right now. 3 are in excellent condition, one needs some audio work and one needs all the capacitors changed.
      I also leave the screws off the covers so I can slide them back and manually clean the heads when I run into some bad tapes (tapes that were crinkled or damaged or have iron oxide flaking off).

      The capacitors is the big issue with these. Every.Single.One needs to be replaced at some point.
      I used to send my machines out to a place in Texas to have them changed for around $300 after I bought them on eBay.
      Then there was a guy selling them on eBay with the caps changed out for around $300 and they were running like new.
      I think he is still there.

      These machines are excellent at playing back difficult to track tapes, or ones recorded in SLP/EP mode.
      don't buy one of those all-in-one VHS to DVD machines unless your tapes are all in good condition and recorded in SP mode.

      --
      I like microcars
  5. least amount of pain.... by Velociraptor101 · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.amazon.com/gp/produ... "Toshiba DVR620 DVD/VHS Recorder" Highly recommend it. Read reviews and follow fellow buyers recommendations and its fantastic. Non-tech users can be taught to use it as well.

  6. Don't get a VHS player... by DexterIsADog · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...you want to go Betamax.

  7. Ion Audio by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 2

    I've had good luck with an Ion cassette-to-USB deck for ripping an old tape collection to digital on the computer. They've got a VHS-to-USB one as well: http://www.ionaudio.com/products/details/vcr-2-pc.

  8. Re:Pre Macrovision with 4+ heads by HTMLSpinnr · · Score: 5, Informative

    The number of heads only matters if the content was recorded at SLP/EP speed. On a 4-head VCR, 2 wider heads are optimized for SP playback, and the other two narrower heads are optimized for SLP/EP.

    --
    $ man woman *
    -bash: /usr/bin/man: Argument list too long
  9. Make sure it has s-video output by Solandri · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've converted several old family VHS (and Beta/Hi8) tapes to digital. In my experience, s-video output makes a much bigger quality difference than the type or quality of player. Composite video (the yellow plug in the yellow, red, white RCA triplet) combines both luminosity (brightness) and chroma (color) into one signal, resulting in a lot of crosstalk (the shimmering "marching ants" when you display high-contrast lines and borders). S-video keeps these signals separate so there is no cross-talk. Makes for a much cleaner transfer to digital.

    Of course if the original tape was recorded using a composite signal, then there's nothing you can do.

    1. Re:Make sure it has s-video output by Air-conditioned+cowh · · Score: 4, Informative

      Also, on top of S-Video output, make sure it has all the latest VHS quality enhancements such as S-VHS (probaby has if it has a S-VIDEO output -duh!) and FM sound. Although it won't help with tapes that were never recorded in these formats, it will certainly bring out the best of the tapes that were.

      For old analogue audio recordings, being able to tweak the audio head azimuth will help bring out the best of the recording. I also consider this essential for archiving cassette and open reel recordings. You have to hear how much difference being able to tweak aziumuth makes to believe it. It is a critical adjustment and the playback azimuth has to match that of the recorder otherwise all your top end goes down the plug-hole and it sounds washed out.

    2. Re:Make sure it has s-video output by tepples · · Score: 2

      In composite NTSC, (roughly) luma is 0-4.2 MHz and chroma is 3.0-4.2 MHz. Though VHS recorded luma and chroma separately, VHS recorded only 0-3.0 MHz of luma and far less chroma, making them easy to tease apart even without a comb filter. S-VHS had more luma bandwidth, requiring S-Video in order not to have them overlap.

    3. Re:Make sure it has s-video output by adolf · · Score: 2

      Eh?

      There's a lot of misinformation here: Not just with your post, but everywhere.

      Let's start with audio.

      Initially, all VHS tapes had a monaural sound track that is recorded linearly at very low speed, in a manner not at all dissimilar to a Compact Cassette (but worse). It sucks, but it's all that such a tape has: If you have such a tape, you'll have to make the best of it.

      Some VHS tapes (mostly original studio releases) also have a linear stereo soundtrack. This also sucks (again, because the tape speed is too low for excellent audio), but it's all the tape has. This stereo linear soundtrack is often recorded with Dolby B, but not always (and if it is, you better have a proper Dolby B decoder on the output, or you're doing it wrong). Consumer VCRs that could deal with linear stereo were and are rare.

      Many tapes, whether studio releases or otherwise, that were recorded on equipment newer than the mid-late 80s also have a Hi-Fi soundtrack, which can be either stereo or monaural. This is both recorded and played back using the helical-scanning video head, and is (indeed) rather Hi-Fi: It has excellent channel separation, and excellent signal-to-noise, and excellent frequency response.

      Lots of home-made Hi-Fi tapes have mono sound, because that was all the recorder could handle, even though the Hi-Fi standard specified two channels. This was for marketing purposes: You could sell a mono Hi-Fi VCR or camcorder next to a stereo Hi-Fi VCR, and both would perform similarly...except the former was cheaper, and the latter had stereo IO. (===$Profit!)

      Yes, VHS Hi-Fi uses a frequency modulation system to accomplish its awesomeness (and it is still awesome, even in these modern enlightened times). But it was never marketed as such, so looking for a VHS VCR that supports "FM" is a non-starter.

      Which of these is best for playback and archival depends on entirely the tape in question, and what audio formats it has recorded on it, and how those formats were handled through the original signal chain, the level of deterioration of the tape itself, the calibration of the playback machine to the recorded tape, [...].

      Meanwhile, video. Video is simpler to discuss, because VHS only has one video format: Composite NTSC.

      A lot of people keep saying "Oh, and make sure it has something with an S-Video output, because that's better."

      And I'm here to tell you: Dude, it doesn't matter. You might theoretically buy a VHS player with a Faroudja-scaled 1080p output over SDI, and it STILL doesn't matter: Regular VHS tapes always and only just have composite video on the tape itself, with the luminance and chroma signals multiplexed together. Accordingly, the very best unprocessed video that a regular VHS tape can present is composite NTSC, because that's all that is on the tape.

      The only inherent difference, again with regular VHS media, between a player with an S-Video output, and a player with a composite output, is which device is responsible for comb filtering the composite video: The tape machine, or the playback machine/capture device.

      So, one has a choice: Do you trust this role of Y/C separation to a possibly decades-old analog machine on blind faith that "S-Video is better," or do you trust it to modern video hardware wherein the capacitors have not yet aged, the solder joints are still good, and much of it probably happens in well-developed DSP-land?

      I'll pick the latter, myself, unless I had a remarkably good and recently tuned S-VHS deck which is known to have an excellent comb filter....and even if I had such a beast (which is going to cost a nontrivial amount of money), I'd still compare the two methods with a very skeptical eye. Digital scalers, de-interlacers, and digital comb filters have progressed by leaps and bounds over the past decade and a half or so, to the point that a cheap TV from Wal-Mart can a better job of handling these things than the very best (and very expensive) hardware from

  10. Hauppauge WinTV-HVR-2250 by Talinom · · Score: 4, Informative

    2 head VCRs are SP only. 4 head VCRs add two heads for EP. If all of your content is SP then a 2 head VCR should suffice. Depending upon the quality of the audio you want to present you might consider either stereo or Hi-Fi. Whatever VCR you choose should have manual tracking adjustment.

    For capturing content on a Windows box I cannot recommend the Hauppauge WinTV-HVR-2250 highly enough. That capture card should also be compatible with MythTV.

    The output from my current consumer grade 4 head Panasonic Omnivision (mono audio) VCR was friggin amazing. My wife had a selection of out of print VHS tapes and I captured them with that card. She was missing one tape and while searching for it I found a three pack of DVDs, one of which matched what she was missing and two of which matched what she had. I had to look at the output frame by frame to see if there was any perceptible difference between the Hauppauge output and the DVD. There was none.

    Even with normal recordings from home there can be issues with the picture quality. If you have problems with the video becoming lighter and darker that my not be a copy protection issue (obviously as you are working with home movies). Consider purchasing a Digital video stabilizer. The guys at the electronics repair shop nearby recommend ones by MCM Electronics to help mitigate transfer issues.

    Tossing your MPEG-2 output from the Hauppauge through the NLE of your choice might help with noise reduction (I use NeatVideo> and color skew. YMMV.

    --
    "Giving money and power to governments is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys." - P.J. O'Rourke
  11. Buy a new one by edibobb · · Score: 2

    Get a cheap, new VHS player. It's higher quality than the expensive ones were 30 years ago. Something like Toshiba SD-V296. A used one will probably work, but you're taking a chance that it's sold because it's unreliable.

  12. Don't forget the other half of the equation. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 4, Insightful

    evaluate the cost of a vcr and the amount of time you have to transfer, I cannot provide a value to your time then compare it to the cost of outsourcing and make choice.

    Include the cost of your time in dealing with the outsourcing service, too.

    There's also the issues of:
      - what values you put on letting others see your tapes,
      - the risk of them making copies,
      - whether anything you want to tansfer is copyright-encumbered and the service wouldn't copy that for you.
      - the relative likelyhood of quality transfers and tape damage when done by a professional service versus do-it-yourself. They have the experience but you have the personal involvement.
    You need to evaluate these as well.

    (I often do things myself rather than hire them done because I'm more comfortable blaming myself than someone else if something breaks - even if breakage due to my efforts may be more likely. I also enjoy learning new skills and technical trivia, even if I'm unlikely to use them again later, and surprising situations keep coming up where some tidbit turns out to be useful.)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  13. Send them out by JaneTheIgnorantSlut · · Score: 3, Informative

    I had some VHS tapes converted to DVD at Walmart. Cost was about $20 for 2 tapes. Took about a week. Results are quite good, considering the VHS tapes were made from old 8mm movies going back to the late 40's. At the time I looked at doing it myself, but decided my time was worth more than $20.

    1. Re:Send them out by JaneTheIgnorantSlut · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Must be nice to be part of the 1%.

      It is.

  14. Re:Dude, don't a get a VHS.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Fuck BETA!

  15. Hire Someone by odie5533 · · Score: 2

    Send your VHS tapes into a company and have them do it. They have much better equipment than you can afford, and it saves you the hassle of having to find a recorder and do it yourself. I recently sent VHS tapes + 8mm reels + slides in to a company to have them digitized. The results were incredible. I have a VCR and a capture card, as well as a slide projector and a slide scanner, but the quality of their high end equipment was unbelievable. I didn't realize an old slide could hold such high quality photographs, and the scans my little slide scanner made were not even approaching the quality of theirs.

    Have a company digitize your tapes. If the content on them is meaningful to you, you won't regret it.

  16. Re:Tapes are better by Pentium100 · · Score: 2

    Yes and analog tapes are also quite good for long term storage - you can store a tape for 20-30 years without a problem, while digital media (other than digital tapes) cannot be stored for this long, they need constant copying.

  17. Speaking from personal experience by Hamsterdan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I did about 15-20 of them last year, some of them Macrovision protected. I used an Hauppauge PVR-150 capture card (didn't seem to mind Macrovision like my Theatre 550), or I could have used my video stabiliser.

    I used two vcrs. A really nice JVC from around 1986 (HR-830U) for most of the tapes with the PVR-150. for some of the tapes where I couldn't get audio from both channels (mangled tape), I used a Samsung VHS/DVD combo since that one allowed me to force left or right on both channels (but no manual tracking).

    Most important thing, be prepared to clean the machine quite a bit using a wet cleaning system, not the abrasive ones, as those old tapes could flake (or be dirty). For capture, I used DVD movie factory (came with an old burner) and Video Redo (trial) for commercial removal and editing. Figure about 2GB/hour on DVD Quality (not worth going higher since it's only VHS.

    If it's an old VCR, be prepared to replace straps as some of them might have dried out or decomposed / broken (like I'm about to do on the old Beta, one of them is slipping).

    As someone else said in the thread, some home movies might have issues with white balance, a video stabiliser is helpful to help fix that issue...

    --
    I've got better things to do tonight than die.
  18. Re:Pre Macrovision with 4+ heads by RackinFrackin · · Score: 4, Funny

    Good point. Get two.

  19. Re:Pre Macrovision with 4+ heads by beltsbear · · Score: 3, Informative

    Not always. Heads are used for many things. The first 4 head units were done for better pause action not for better EP mode.

    If you are playing back a regular 2 hour mode tape and don't care about the sound almost anything that was good quality will work. If you need good sound and the original was done in HIFI you should make sure the new deck you get is HIFI as well.

    My last good VCR was an 8 head unit. 2 for SP, 2 for SLP/EP, 2 for better pause and 2 for HIFI sound.

  20. Re:Pre Macrovision with 4+ heads by CanEHdian · · Score: 3, Funny

    Not always. Heads are used for many things. The first 4 head units were done for better pause action not for better EP mode.

    Was this right after "Basic Instinct" came out on VHS? ;-)

    --
    When the copyright term is "forever minus a day", live every day like it's the last.
  21. Re:Sony by hambone142 · · Score: 2

    There is a lot of variability throughout the years with Sony VHS players. Back in the early '90s, the quality was very good (and I paid 700 dollars for a VHS/HiFi deck). Later, when they started outsourcing to China, their quality went to crap (early 2000 vintage). I own both decks FWIW.

  22. Re:Tapes are better by Pentium100 · · Score: 2

    This is because the data density is so low. However, modern media (recordable CDs, DVDs, hard drives, flash memory) do not hold onto their data for very long. Hard drives might retain the magnetization, but their mechanical parts can wear out (if it's on all the time) or just fail (if it's off all the time, heads can stick or lubrication can harden and it's not like you can oil the hard drive like a floppy or tape drive).

    OTOH, analog tape (video or audio) retains the data for very long time (I have a tape recorded in 1951 and it still plays OK) and the machines that play it can be maintained and repaired and are still quite available (used).

  23. How old are the tapes? by hackertourist · · Score: 2

    I tried something similar with some audio cassettes a few years ago, and found that I was too late: the tape had begun to stick together, and required more power than my high-end Denon tape deck could muster to play back. Rewinding didn't work either, as there's a tape tension sensor that shuts down the motor if it gets overloaded.

  24. Re:Tapes are better by Pentium100 · · Score: 2

    Yes, and unlike more modern tapes it is made of paper, the brand name is "Soundmirror". The paper tape can snap in some tape decks (like the Revox A77), but in a tape deck with servo tension or on that has one motor (the tension is lower on these) it plays OK. It was recorded full track, but it looks like only in the center - if played on a 4 track tape deck, only the right channel plays.

  25. Re:Pre Macrovision with 4+ heads by iamhassi · · Score: 2

    Not always. Heads are used for many things. The first 4 head units were done for better pause action not for better EP mode.

    Was this right after "Basic Instinct" came out on VHS? ;-)

    If you want porn, watch porn. What the point on pausing a movie to hopefully see some cunt's crotch.

    Because you're 13 and internet didn't exist yet, pausing a movie was the best you got.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  26. Re:Tapes are better by Reziac · · Score: 2

    Your old tape probably has a very thick oxide layer on a fairly thick backing, compared to modern stuff.

    Back when dinosaurs roamed the Earth, I got my VHS blank tapes from a guy who bought it straight from TDK -- at the time that was the only place I could find their best retail tape, which was about half again 'thicker' than standard consumer tape (and cost about half again as much, too). Per what he told me, this was basically the seconds from their studio-grade tape, and it was still miles above standard tape. When you're recording off a weak over-the-air signal, tape quality makes a huge difference.

    At the far end of the scale, you couldn't give me Kodak tapes.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  27. Re:Wow by sh00z · · Score: 2

    The things Star Wars fans have to put up with just to watch some movies...

    I know it was intended as funny, but the internet search term that will help here is "Harmy Despecialized Editions."