Slashdot Mirror


It's World Password Day: Change Your Passwords

An anonymous reader writes "Today is World Password Day — a day dedicated to promoting the use of strong passwords and the creation of good habits. However insecure this method of authentication is, it's not going away anytime soon, and people should be educated on how to make the best of it. To that end, last year Intel started an action-oriented campaign to raise user awareness regarding password problems, and this year their initiative has a new digital home. Passwordday.org provides the Password Blaster (a videogame that teaches good passwords using real leaked passwords), the Password Strength Meter, links to McAfee's Heartbleed Test tool, offers animated educational GIFs and tips and tricks for upgrading your passwords."

116 comments

  1. Enough "world days" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Please.

    1. Re:Enough "world days" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Personally I'm waiting for the "World days awareness day".

    2. Re:Enough "world days" by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 1

      World world day day.

    3. Re:Enough "world days" by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, we have not filled them up yet.

      America is out of food days, now there are duplicates.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    4. Re:Enough "world days" by webnut77 · · Score: 1

      hunter2 -> hunter3

    5. Re:Enough "world days" by flyneye · · Score: 1, Funny

      World " Change Underwear Day "
        "You! Change underwear with him. You! Change underwear with her. You bring that thong on over here and change with me sweetie "....

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    6. Re:Enough "world days" by quenda · · Score: 1

      It is also "World record Post-it Note sales" day.

    7. Re:Enough "world days" by Bugamn · · Score: 1

      Why are changing ******* to *******?

  2. OK, but not sure 123456 is any better than 1234 by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Don't see what the point is

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:OK, but not sure 123456 is any better than 1234 by umghhh · · Score: 1

      it is 1234->1235

    2. Re:OK, but not sure 123456 is any better than 1234 by rasmusbr · · Score: 3, Funny

      You're doing it wrong. It's suppose to be something like Hj1pAab5!z21i0lO&sa8q0, on a sticky note attached to the machine.

    3. Re:OK, but not sure 123456 is any better than 1234 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My bank will not accept a password with any consecutive numbers.

      But it will accept a password with NO numbers.

    4. Re:OK, but not sure 123456 is any better than 1234 by SJHillman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My bank assigned me the random PIN of "1234" for my debit card. One of my student loan websites (Citibank) ignored anything past the 8th character of your password anyway. One of my old credit unions had a six character password limit, alphanumeric only. Financial institutions are a little behind the times.

    5. Re:OK, but not sure 123456 is any better than 1234 by msauve · · Score: 3, Funny

      Password.2014

      Upper case, lower case, symbol, digit, more than 12 chars. Check!

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    6. Re:OK, but not sure 123456 is any better than 1234 by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

      If you MacGyver the executive secretary's desk drawer, you will find the passwords to all the C*Os of the company on sticky notes, as well.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    7. Re:OK, but not sure 123456 is any better than 1234 by msauve · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't want to know how those notes got sticky.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    8. Re:OK, but not sure 123456 is any better than 1234 by sootman · · Score: 1

      My bank allows letters and numbers only and is not case-sensitive. This is so the password can be used on phone keypads.

      In other security news, AmEx requires a number or special character IN YOUR USERNAME. WTF?

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    9. Re:OK, but not sure 123456 is any better than 1234 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft's "practice" gives a "BEST" to this one: {1aAAAAAAAAAAA

    10. Re:OK, but not sure 123456 is any better than 1234 by nitehawk214 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't want to know how those notes got sticky.

      She is a big fan of McGuyver.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    11. Re:OK, but not sure 123456 is any better than 1234 by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      I put the 123456 on a publicly shared network file called "Passwords.docx" - is that good enough?

      And then enabled Bluetooth.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    12. Re:OK, but not sure 123456 is any better than 1234 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other security news, AmEx requires a number or special character IN YOUR USERNAME. WTF?

      So does Chase.

    13. Re:OK, but not sure 123456 is any better than 1234 by jcoy42 · · Score: 1

      Probably the best variant of this I've seen was a friend who concatenated md5sums of various kernels he'd compiled into a string and printed them onto a dog tag which he kept on his person.

      Based on something he knew about the machines location he started at a certain row and column and typed a certain number of characters off the tag.

      --
      Never trust an atom. They make up everything.
    14. Re:OK, but not sure 123456 is any better than 1234 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What about password length? My bank is similar, only letters and numbers but requires at least on uppercase letter...but a MAXIMUM length of 5 characters!

    15. Re:OK, but not sure 123456 is any better than 1234 by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      You're doing it wrong. It's suppose to be something like Hj1pAab5!z21i0lO&sa8q0, on a sticky note attached to the machine.

      That's the combination^W^W my Bitcoin address!

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    16. Re:OK, but not sure 123456 is any better than 1234 by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      That reminds me of the other quirk of my bank.... username is case sensitive. e.g. SJHillman was already taken, but it let's me use Sjhillman

    17. Re:OK, but not sure 123456 is any better than 1234 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't do that. That is just asking for confusion and access to your account by someone else. This is especially so because they have to have some way to reset passwords.

    18. Re:OK, but not sure 123456 is any better than 1234 by Maritz · · Score: 1

      If username is the only way they can identify your account to reset it you've got serious issues. Account number springs to mind.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    19. Re:OK, but not sure 123456 is any better than 1234 by allo · · Score: 1

      my bank limits the password to 5 alphanum chars

    20. Re:OK, but not sure 123456 is any better than 1234 by allo · · Score: 1

      looks quite okay, doesn't it? Is it in any real world password set? Is it in a wordlist? How many password crackers provide brute-force preset options, which will find this one in a short time? I guess you would have be quite secure, if you actually used it.
      Now you can argue, slashdotters will tune their bruteforce tools to include a lot of consecutive letters with only little random parts before/after maybe in the middle, but if you have to many exception rules, you will miss passwords which can be brute forced easier.
      The best system is an easy one with many chars, which is your personal one. Nobody will try to optimize his cracker for hundereds of possible personal systems, but try to get the password123 ones. Okay, maybe except you're snowden, then they will use a team of 20 psychologists to analyse what your password setting pattern might be.

    21. Re:OK, but not sure 123456 is any better than 1234 by JohhnyTHM · · Score: 1

      A few years ago I swapped my credit card for a better interest rate on the balance, not really intending to use the card for purchases.

      When I finally started using it for large purchases I decided to try out the the online banking, but as I had never used it before there was no password set up. I gave them a call and explained what I wanted to do and asked them to send me a password reset to get online with.

      The reply: "Oh, we set that up for you when you opened the account. The password is set to your date of birth."

      I was less than impressed.

      This was Barclaycard in the UK, so If you have one of their cards and have never used the online banking I would go and change it right now (assuming they have not learnt anything about security in the meantime).

    22. Re:OK, but not sure 123456 is any better than 1234 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That should constitute criminal negligence.

    23. Re:OK, but not sure 123456 is any better than 1234 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not sure I see the point of a long bank card PIN. All the ATMs I have ever use block your card
      after the third try. If its a Visa or Mastercard Logo you can use it by signing the slip and hope the checkout doesn't
      check you ID. Also, the initial PIN is not usually random. It is just a default that you are instructed to change at once. Either that or when you apply for the card you select a PIN. Mailed out cards usually have to be activated by calling from your phone number of record. One final point,if your card is lost or stolen and you report it within 24 hours you are not liable for anything and even if you don't report it immediatly your loss is limited to $50.

  3. i liked to play Password by turkeydance · · Score: 2

    Ludden was the best.

    1. Re:i liked to play Password by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Is that you Betty?

  4. And Tomorrow is 'What was my password again?' Day by Curialis · · Score: 5, Funny

    IT Workers rejoice!!

  5. Tomorrow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Followed by "Reset Your Password Day" tomorrow.

  6. There's an idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A "No More World Days" Day!
    Maybe Hallmark will get behind this.

  7. It's World Sniff Your Password Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What a great time to sniff or keylog, knowing a lot of people will be changing their passwords!

    I hope I'm wrong.

  8. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is all.

    1. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, a better version would be: "No. Piss off."

  9. Let's not celebrate passwords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Passwords, and with them password reset questions, need to go away. There are proper authentication mechanisms. Passwords are not among them.

    1. Re:Let's not celebrate passwords by mlts · · Score: 1

      What I'd like to see is a service like the following:

      One gets a client cert like how it is done normally... but the cert is used as a CA cert, perhaps stored in a dedicated HSM. Then, when one uses a new computer or gets a new smartphone, the device has a client cert, then it gets signed by one's own CA cert. That way, one has the security of client certs but without the need to manually copy the same certificate to each device (and risk having it stolen.) If a cert is stolen, the CA cert one has can easily revoke the stolen device key.

      Realistically, if I were to make a large website, I'd have two-factor authentication mandatory, but flexible (so if someone has multiple phones or dual-SIM phones), it can send a code or use a voice (for POTS lines that can't do SMS) for the authentication code.

      Recovery would be done by a number of means... perhaps recovery questions have a place, but they have to be detailed and stored encrypted... and even then, someone going through a mark's background can get access. Having some text one signs with their PGP key and pastes into a box is another method. Perhaps a method similar to Facebook's recovery with a shared secret stored among friends so you get x out of y associates to vouch for someone is another way.

      Of course, there is always the option of a hardware device like a SecurID token that one just types the number shown to get access to an account. This makes it easy because physical security is usually a lot more straightforward than network security for some people. Of course the downside is that who gets the token owns the account. (Yes, it can end up PIN protected like the older "calculator" style SecurID tokens... but what happens if the PIN gets forgotten.)

    2. Re:Let's not celebrate passwords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep It Simple, Silly. Self-signed client certificates from a user's CA certificate sounds like a great idea, but... (a) how does a non-technical end user install a client certificate on their iOS device again? (b) given that users can't be trusted to have good passwords in the first place how are they going to manage the security of their CA certificate any better, and all of their devices will be compromised when their CA certificate gets lost/stolen.

    3. Re:Let's not celebrate passwords by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I hate the two factor stuff, since it all wants to be on a smart phone. But I will not use a smart phone for this (more ways for google to spy on me). And many of the sites that want the two factor stuff are fluffy social sites where it's not important whereas the really vital stuff like banks have basic security.

    4. Re:Let's not celebrate passwords by allo · · Score: 1

      The main reason for password insecurity is brute force, not stolen devices.

  10. Whirled Password Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Today is the day you should scramble your passwords by putting them into a blender, tornado, or other device to whirl them sufficiently to mix them up a bit.

  11. WorldPasswordDay1! by danbert8 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Let's celebrate with 8-16 characters that must include at least one capital, one number, and one symbol but not repeat any character more than twice. Ahh screw it, why don't we celebrate World Write Down Your Password On A Post-It Note Day?

    --
    Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    1. Re:WorldPasswordDay1! by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      Salem1!

    2. Re:WorldPasswordDay1! by SailorSpork · · Score: 1

      Or OBLIG XKCD LINK: http://xkcd.com/936/

    3. Re:WorldPasswordDay1! by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      hunter2

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    4. Re:WorldPasswordDay1! by scdeimos · · Score: 1

      I think you meant: W0rldP4assw0rdD4y!

  12. Change your passwords... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..so the Heartbleed has a better chance of seeing both your old and new.

  13. I recommend by BobMcD · · Score: 3, Funny

    worldp@sswordday14

    That way you can remember it until next year!

  14. World Packet Trace Day by jlv · · Score: 1

    Change your passwords today, so our new filters can capture them!

    1. Re:World Packet Trace Day by jlv · · Score: 1

      Or even better, type your new password into our webpage and we'll tell you if it's secure.

  15. perhaps consider a passphrase. by nimbius · · Score: 2

    Ive used passphrases from passwdqc for quite some time. theyre just as complex and a whole lot easier to remember. The downside being many websites still restrict users to 8 or 10 character passwords whereas phrases can easily consume 17 or more characters.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:perhaps consider a passphrase. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And many sites still restrict white space, so "correct horse battery staple" is considered a weak/invalid password.

    2. Re:perhaps consider a passphrase. by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      If a site restricts your passphrase/word to some arbitrary limit, be concerned that they aren't hashing it and instead storing it in plaintext. Hash output will be the same length regardless of input length, so a password limit makes no sense. There may be DoS protection in limiting input to *some* length, but not less than (arbitrarily) 2^8 characters.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    3. Re:perhaps consider a passphrase. by allo · · Score: 1

      nope. I use passphrases almost everywhere, there are only a few sites which are refusing it. (sadly including my bank, which demands a 5 char password)

  16. Stop it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This nonsense about numbers and symbols was doomed from the start. Either it's written on a sticky or a simple modification (append a 1, first letter cap, etc) that tables have long since accounted for. It's a waste of time and misleading users.

    We should have LONG since been encouraging mixed/abbreviated passphrases. Machine-readable (including horsestaplebatterycorrect) is a recipe for disaster, anything that's can be directly analogous to human thought is.

    Something like "hsbcxkcd" is better. Something like "hsbcidgaf" is better yet. Common songs (r3ybgdts is 'row your boat') may seem insecure when tables/DBs start catching up, but it turns out you can blend them (r3ybhyaw is += 'have you any wool') without causing use of stickies under the keyboard. The mental adjustment is minimal, arguably easier than appending a 1, and yet it delivers excellent mutation.

    Another advantage is incremental changes. The next line of "row your boat" offers "m3libad", and allows compliance with forced/desired password change without really relearning a new password. As a perk, the gibberish is harder to recognize to human eyes, whether it's an invader skimming crude keylogs/dumps or someone physically observing you.

    1. Re:Stop it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Those passwords suck, and I hate you for even suggesting them.

      Better idea, simple passwords. "Pencil".

      Then lock the account after a reasonable number of attempts - like 50. How many tries to brute force a single word password? More than 50.

    2. Re:Stop it by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 2

      Those passwords suck, and I hate you for even suggesting them.

      Better idea, simple passwords. "Pencil".

      Then lock the account after a reasonable number of attempts - like 50. How many tries to brute force a single word password? More than 50.

      Yikes, that's horrible, horrible advice.

      You need to stay away far, far from single dictionary word passwords. If the hashed password database is compromised, you need a password that will at least withstand a basic dictionary attack, since obviously it's beyond locking because of failed attempts at that point. If there's any significant amount of time between when the breach occurs and when it's discovered, your only defense is a password long and complex enough to withstand any brute-force attempt within a reasonable period of time.

      Incidentally, if everyone took your advice (and many seem to, unfortunately), a significant number of people would still get hacked just because the bad guys happened to guess the correct dictionary word they used. All they have to do is try the first 50 most used words and phrases for every account, and with millions of users, they're bound to guess a few thousand correctly.

      My advice: install LastPass or some other password manager, and then have it generate absolutely random noise passwords - you can even set parameters for sites that don't allow symbols or have length restrictions, etc. Those are automatically filled in when you visit the site. Either your browser will remember them in it's password manager, or a plugin, like LastPass uses will fill them in for you. There's very little reason for a typical user to change a password when it's randomly generated gibberish.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    3. Re:Stop it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Salt should solve the breached hash problem (unless I completely don't understand PKI).

      Only the worst passwords could be guessed in 50 tries. Disallow the blatantly obvious ones.

      I use strong passwords and keep them on a pocket sized notepad in my file cabinet. Thanks to last Wednesday's storms, it ended up under three feet of water. Oops.

    4. Re:Stop it by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      Salt doesn't necessarily solve the breached hash problem if you're using simple dictionary words. It forces a per-hash computation, so they can't use a rainbow table of pre-computed hashes, but dictionary words will still be the second thing criminals will try (the first thing is a quick-list of top password offenders). Sure, it significantly slows the process down, but once the database is offline, there's plenty of CPU horsepower available to do that sort of thing.

      Actually, it may be more accurate to say that there's plenty of GPU power available for that, as cracking software often makes use of banks of high-end videocard GPUs to perform massive amounts of hash calculations per second. GPUs are optimal for this task because of the massive number of parallel processing cores in each card. The only real way to thwart this sort of decoding effort is to use memory-hard hashing algorithms, but I don't think those are in wide-spread use yet.

      So, let's assume a worst case of a billion hashes a second, which I don't think is out of line for today's top-of-the-line video cards, easily within financial reach of your typical internet low-life. We'll use a dictionary of perhaps 20,000 of the most common English works, and let's say we'll throw in enough combinations to round it up to a million hashes that we'll try per user (capitalization + common numeric suffixes). That means that even something like "Pencil92" isn't safe. Let's also assume that we've got a million user hashes to check in total. Total calculation time for a first-pass dictionary attack on every entry in the database? About 1000 seconds. That means we've got plenty of time to try even more complex combinations of passwords after the simple first-pass check.

      Ultimately, the best defense is password complexity, since no amount of hardware can possibly cover all the combinations of a very long and complex password, since length + variation = a combinatorial explosion of possibilities.

      Also, sorry to hear about the storm mess. Never fun to clean up after stuff like that.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
  17. Can tomorrow be world English grammar day? by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    That last sentence in the intro made me a bit ill.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  18. I'll trick 'em all! by jddj · · Score: 2

    12345...7

  19. Can't wait for mooltipass... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the open-source open hardware/software offline password keeper!
    https://github.com/limpkin/mooltipass

  20. Re:Change your representative too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi. See? Now I'm four times worse than her. But you're still a stupid twit.

  21. it's supposed to be "world" by swschrad · · Score: 1

    so change it, already

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
    1. Re:it's supposed to be "world" by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Came up with a better one - Death - nobody will guess that one!

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  22. Okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "password02". Done!

  23. Nope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More like shit websites should change their password policies to prevent small passwords, and have no maximum password length, and update their security system in general because most likely it is terrible and some shit thing they got off some PHP kiddies website.

    I am looking at YOU, Microsoft.
    Ever since they changed their passwords to have a max length, I have been unable to even login to my hotmail even WHEN I only type the first 16 characters.
    And when I tried to recover it, they said "nup, 2bad nerd". Fuck you Microsoft.
    Luckily I never used their atrocious service for anything of worth.
    Hope you die this decade Microsoft. If not I will be just as happy with the next one.

    1. Re:Nope. by darkain · · Score: 1

      This is because Microsoft doesn't change stored passwords on Hotmail when they update policies for the service... Case in point, my dummy account from the '90's still has a password that is well under the minimum number of characters required to login. Very short, sweet, easy to remember, and cannot be brute forced because nobody would think to check a password outside of their "requirements"! (oh wait, fuck, I just admitted publicly there are passwords outside of their requirements)

  24. Not happening. by Cruciform · · Score: 1

    I have 400+ unique passwords. I don't think I'll be changing those for password day.
    I suppose putting my trust in a password manager could also be considered a risk, but I use a passphrase long enough that even someone with an extensive dictionary attack would take years to get through it.

    1. Re:Not happening. by Derekloffin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Indeed, and I've never understood the advice to change your password frequently. The only thing that would help against is if someone has already compromised your account and has been laying low (rather than what they usually do which is clean it out asap). However, changing passwords constantly highly encourages you to use less and less powerful passwords as you can't remember them all the time meaning you're that much more likely to get that initial compromise.

    2. Re:Not happening. by Unknownus · · Score: 1

      The advice to change passwords frequently is meant to protect against offline cracking: If an attacker gets a password database they can quickly try passwords without restrictions. Given enough time and computing power there is no uncrackable password. But if you change your password frequently, by the time the attacker guesses your password successfully it will already be invalid.

    3. Re:Not happening. by ameen.ross · · Score: 1

      That's great, in theory. In reality it will just lead people to create very easy to remember passwords, since people are good at routine and not at things that change constantly. Those easy passwords, in turn, are much more easily cracked. How would you mitigate that risk, increasing the password change frequency?

      I've worked with highly sensitive systems (*ahem* the Ogone payment system for one) that use silly policies like these, and yet are horribly unsafe. At one time when I tried to login with an expired password I got an error message saying that the password was not "completely" valid and that I should understand that the password is case-sensitive! Well, that message implies that they can do a case-insensitive check, which means they don't even hash passwords.

      In my experience these policies just shift the responsibility for proper security to the end-user. Even though, in theory, it may act as a complementary security measure, in practice that's counterproductive for 99% of users. Also it is more often than not used as the only security measure (apart from the basic $input == $password).

      --
      $(echo cm0gLXJmIC8= | base64 --decode)
    4. Re:Not happening. by sudon't · · Score: 1

      I think this is intended for those users who use poor passwords. Although, come to think of it, it wouldn't help them either.

      This shouldn't be an issue. I'm a long-time Mac OS user, which has come with an encrypted password manager since at least 2001. I'm sure Windows must have one by now, too. It's trivial to create a strong, unique password for every site or service I sign-up to, (somewhere north of 600 unique passwords, now), and I've only had to remember one strong password all these years. I've never had an account compromised. Why isn't everyone doing this?

      --
      -- sudon't

      Air-ride Equipped

  25. Worst practices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It actually incourages everybody tu user passwords like P@sSw0rd which are the opposite of secure, it is quite known that a simple passphrase is more secure that using one 8 characters word and adding symbols upper and lower case. They might be hard to a human to guess but they are quite easy to brute force.

  26. Ummm by PaddyM · · Score: 2

    I thought that regularly changing one's password was unnecessary https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2010/11/changing_passwo.html. I thought that it needs to be changed if found to be hacked, but otherwise as long as its strong, there's no need to change it. So while promoting good password habits is a good idea, I'm not sure that "annually change all your passwords on the same day every year so that any eavesdropper/keylogger can look for possible password change activity on one day" is one of them.

    1. Re:Ummm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed if your threat model doesn't include Advanced Persistent Threats that will quietly use your credentials to continually gain data, password changes are useless.

      APTs are a good reason for corporations to require periodic PW changes for employees however.

  27. Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Now I'm going to post as an Anonymous Coward for the next six months!

  28. Bad idea by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    If you were going to install sniffers all over to collect passwords as people changed them, what day would be better than World Password Day...

    I'll let the herds get culled as I watch from the hills above, thanks.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they can sniff you changing your password, why can't they sniff you entering your existing unchanged password?

  29. Click here if you have forgotten your password. by Snufu · · Score: 1

    A new holiday will be sent to your email address.

  30. Coincidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's same day than Men in the middle attack day too !

  31. Security Tokens by darkain · · Score: 1

    I use security tokens instead of passwords, and then external services use OAuth against this centralized service to verify my identity... passwords? What are those!?

  32. Also by geekoid · · Score: 1

    if a legit user can hack you systems, the user password isn't your problem.
    So many site make you enter a secure password to protect their systems. Ignoring the fact that a malicious person could set up an anonymous account.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  33. Thanks for verbiage suggestion, ideas short by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    due to all the past changes. My new password is "It's change your password day"

  34. I don't always change my password.... by y00nix · · Score: 1
  35. sponsored by 3M by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it looks like you're almost out of post-it notes.

  36. once a YEAR huh? by v1 · · Score: 1

    Anything important should be changed more frequently. And anything less important... why do we have a special day for it? Waste of time. *shrug*

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:once a YEAR huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Anything important should be changed more frequently.

      Why? If my password isnt comprised, why the fuck would I change it? All that does is encourage people to use shitty passwords because they have to change them all the time.

      I hate people like you

  37. You've gotta e $h1+n9 M3. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know how I find the time to post this. I spend often more than an hour a day trying to plough the way through passwords that I have lost or forgotten.

    Passwords that the base of existence. I just realized I haven't seen a good movie with meaningful password action.

    Back in the day, I was thrilled that the Internet existed: anonymous FTP existed, where one was asked to use his email address for a password. That was very cool, sorrt of a culture of trust. Where is this going?

    Open Sez Me.

  38. Password change frequency by knarfling · · Score: 1

    Although I do not have proof of this, I believe that the the password change policy came from the way early UNIX systems handled the password files.

    Early UNIX systems did not separate the username file from the password file. Both were kept in /etc/password. This file had to be world readable in order for anyone to log in. So if you had any access at all, including guest access, it was easy to copy the password file. Although the passwords in the the file were hashed, it they could be cracked or a rainbow table created if you had access to a powerful enough computer. At the time, only mainframes or mini computers had the power needed, and cracking a password took between three to five months.

    The thought process was that if someone did steal the password file, and you changed your password every three months, It was very likely that the password was changed by the time the passwords were cracked. These days, more powerful computers can crack the passwords much, much faster, and the UNIX/Linux systems have broken out the passwords from the password file and placed them in a shadow file that is not world readable.

    The danger of the password file being stolen is no longer the same issue as it once was, but the "standard" password policy has never changed. Today, the reason most often given for a change policy is: "This is best practices, so we are going to do it." Few security consultants can give you the real reason for the policy, although many will refer to recent examples of passwords being stolen and tell you that you need to change a password often just in case someone does steal the password. The danger today is not that the person stealing your password will use it, but that they will sell it to someone else. On the one hand, that does give you a little time to change your password, but on the other hand, some people may feel that since their account was not cracked right away that their accounts are still safe.

    --
    Great civilizations have lived and died on false theories. Don't mess up mine with a few facts.
    1. Re: Password change frequency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So many things wrong with this response.

    2. Re: Password change frequency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So many things wrong with this response.
      Is this like a weak version of "everything I say is a lie"?

  39. Easy by sharknado · · Score: 1

    I am celebrating this day by changing my passwords from 'password' to 'password1'.

  40. Luggage Password ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Awesome :O 12345 is also my luggage password!

    http://youtu.be/a6iW-8xPw3k

  41. wrong day, losers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it was on february 1st, all you observers of may 7th are just a bunch of loser wannabe poser copycats

    http://gizmodo.com/tag/change-...

  42. This is a perfect time to employ... by Payden+K.+Pringle · · Score: 1

    passphrases.

    Because (ignore quotes) "bob is a dork and i hate my job" is largely easier to remember and more powerful than, "Tr0ub3c43r#$" [insert obligatory XKCD].

    I mean really. If a person makes a passphrase as a full sentence (i.e. spaces, punctuation, capitalization, all the things grammar teachers teach), then that will give some part of school you likely never cared about some meaning in your life, and it would make your passphrases much more secure and easier to remember (i.e. it tells you a lot about your passphrase already).

    Although the most annoying part (as always) is typos.

  43. I'm changing my password to 'incorrect' by Kittenman · · Score: 2

    That way, when I forget it, the software/site will come back and tell me "Your password is incorrect', so I don't have to remember it at all.

    --
    "The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes" - Winston Churchill
    1. Re:I'm changing my password to 'incorrect' by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      My software told me "your username/password is invalid". So I entered "invalid" for both. Still didn't work.

    2. Re:I'm changing my password to 'incorrect' by Kittenman · · Score: 1

      My software told me "your username/password is invalid". So I entered "invalid" for both. Still didn't work.

      You're not doing it right, maybe.

      --
      "The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes" - Winston Churchill
    3. Re:I'm changing my password to 'incorrect' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not doing it right, maybe.

      That's what she said!

      Who am I kidding, this is /. She doesn't even exist.

  44. I hate to admit XKCD was right, but....goddamnit by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

    The prevalence of the passwords requiring uppercase, lowercase, punctuation etc is ridiculous as more and more sites and servers I use are requiring it.

    I'm going to make an assumption here and I bet I'm I'm right. (I have NO idea!)
    The VAST majority of security breaches are due to poorly patched software / bugs / social engineering / angry staff etc.
    I'd wager very very few password hacks are due to people having the password
    "momspajamas2212" instead of "M0mspaJAMas22!2"

    I will say I'm finding the only way to still remember my passwords on sites now is to start using pattern based passwords, example "$RFV%TGB4rfv5tgb" (try typing that) - it's not ideal but I can remember the bastard thing. (I hope this helps someone else out, I gave it out to someone recently and they adopted something similar pretty much instantly and yes, I know you could add patterns to the dictionary)

  45. Re:I hate to admit XKCD was right, but....goddamni by jrumney · · Score: 1

    My favorite incident of what I call "security by handwaving" was my bank changing the wording on their site from password to passphrase, but they rejected the space character and limited the "passphrase" to 16 characters.

  46. Buck the trend by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

    So what if this is a ruse to get people to change passwords on the one day that security exploits are in place to capture the new passwords? Buck the trend and change them some other day or not at all.

  47. Re:I hate to admit XKCD was right, but....goddamni by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

    The prevalence of the passwords requiring uppercase, lowercase, punctuation etc is ridiculous as more and more sites and servers I use are requiring it.

    I'm going to make an assumption here and I bet I'm I'm right. (I have NO idea!)
    The VAST majority of security breaches are due to poorly patched software / bugs / social engineering / angry staff etc.
    I'd wager very very few password hacks are due to people having the password
    "momspajamas2212" instead of "M0mspaJAMas22!2"

    I will say I'm finding the only way to still remember my passwords on sites now is to start using pattern based passwords, example "$RFV%TGB4rfv5tgb" (try typing that) - it's not ideal but I can remember the bastard thing. (I hope this helps someone else out, I gave it out to someone recently and they adopted something similar pretty much instantly and yes, I know you could add patterns to the dictionary)

    If you look at those who have analyzed cracked databases to see what passwords people actually used, you'll find that people get hacked because they're using passwords like "password", "123456", "monkey", and so on.

    Honestly, I've found that a password manager is really the only sane way to use cryptographically secure (and completely different) passwords on every site without worrying about losing those passwords. I use Lastpass, since it syncs between machines automatically and has a plugin which automatically fills in the username and password for you, and will detect when you change existing passwords or create new ones. There are a bunch of other good ones too if you don't like the idea of your encrypted password database being store online (note: it's encrypted locally, so Lastpass never sees anything but a binary blob).

    --
    Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
  48. Too many rules.... by knwny · · Score: 1

    Why cannot we force all websites and services to comply with a common password complexity rule? There is a wide variation in the rules that phone companies, banks, utilities and various online services enforce when I create passwords. As a consequence, it becomes difficult to decide on a password-generating algorithm to create and remember passwords across these websites/services. So, coming back to the question, can we not have a standard password complexity rule which every website/service has to stick to? Instead of those irritating, little info boxes near the password field listing different passwords rules for different websites, we could have a URL pointing to the standard password rules which in turn would be maintained by an independent organisation. Obligatory: https://xkcd.com/927/

  49. On the other hand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    correct1horse!batteryAstaple is a damn great password. It's so good I even use it myself!

  50. Take that crackers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Changing my password today is exactly what the crackers would expect me to do. But I'm going to confuse them by using the same password I've been using for more than a decade.

  51. Fallout by unapersson · · Score: 1

    Does that mean today is World "I Forgot My Password" day?

  52. Password mine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    passwordday.org = password mine?

    User: "Here, let me give you my password to check its strength."
    user@passwordday.org:~$ 247181bd0bc7$*d8420c_!05ab#!3c97ebfa9b

    Server: "BEST. You found a password that is bombproof! Now pick another one."

    User: "Gahhhh!"

  53. my password is not 1234 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's one-thousand-two-hundred and thirty... oh wait.