Slashdot Mirror


ANTVR - China's Answer To Oculus Rift Is Raising Funds

dryriver (1010635) writes "Chinese technology startup ANTVR is raising funds on Kickstarter for a new, gaming oriented VR Headset capable of rivaling FaceBook's Oculus Rift VR Headset technologically speaking. The ANTVR headset features a full HD screen (1920 x 1080, 1 megapixel per eye), 100 degrees of FOV, 9-axis motion detect with low latency (1 ms), wireless communication, support for Playstation, Xbox, PC, Android gaming platforms, as well as an interesting 'virtual gun' type controller that can be folded open into a steering wheel or gamepad-type controller, and also holds batteries that can power the ANTVR for 3 — 8 hours. Interesting technical features include being able to detect whether the ANTVR wearer steps forward, backwards, to the left or to the right, and also whether the wearer crouches or jumps. The ANTVR headset also comes with a viewing window at the bottom of the unit that can be opened, so you can glance down and see your hands and keyboard and mouse for example. What makes ANTVR interesting is that it isn't a 'cheap Chinese knockoff of Oculus Rift'. A lot of original thought seems to have gone into making ANTVR a 'significantly different from a design standpoint' competitor to Oculus Rift. It now remains to be seen how much money ANTVR can raise on Kickstarter, and how many real world users/gamers opt for this new Chinese VR kit over the older — and currently — more famous Oculus Rift."

104 comments

  1. Re:limited field of view by Selur · · Score: 1

    got a link to these 'early reports'?

  2. Sorry by bhcompy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Not going to be giving money to a Chinese startup on Kickstarter. It's already difficult enough to determine which Kickstarters are legit, not even going to get into one's in sketchy countries like China

    1. Re:Sorry by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How is China sketchier than your country?

    2. Re:Sorry by bhcompy · · Score: 1

      How isn't it?

    3. Re:Sorry by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      You have the burden of proof here, not him to prove the counterargument. :)

    4. Re:Sorry by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Im not sure if you're kidding or not. Even with things like OBD2 car scanners, when you buy the chinese-made ELM327 knockoffs on amazon you have to factor in the fact that theres a 50-50 chance that your device will be DOA or will die after first use.

      China is NOTORIOUS for knock-offs that are "good enough" to get sold and then fall to pieces immediately after. If you dont know about this, you simply havent dealt with very many chinese goods. Go to one of their big marketplaces and try and buy legit Gamecube or Wii games-- theres a nearly 100% chance those games are bogus and simply dont work.

      The US has very strong consumer protection laws, China has nearly zero.

    5. Re:Sorry by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      Well there's a history of ignoring US laws/treaties when needed, widespread and obvious corruption, and they speak some weird language with a bunch of symbols.

    6. Re:Sorry by LordLimecat · · Score: 3

      This is like claiming someone has the burden of proof in proving that nearly 90% of hacks are initiated from China, Russia, or eastern europe.

      At some point something enters the pool of common knowledge, and you just look ridiculous asking for proof.

    7. Re:Sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Been living in China for 12 years. Married, kid, the whole nine yards. China is pretty fucking sketchy, let me tell you. I just don't trust anything Chinese, particularly software. Or hardware. Or food. Or doctors. Or the education system. Or the law. Or anything.

    8. Re:Sorry by jones_supa · · Score: 2

      This is like claiming someone has the burden of proof in proving that nearly 90% of hacks are initiated from China, Russia, or eastern europe.

      They absolutely have the burden of proof in proving that. Akamai's report from last year shows that the top 3 are China, Indonesia and... *drumroll* ...United States! In this case the question of how China is any more sketchy than USA, could also be asked again. They're in the same boat.

    9. Re:Sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't harvest the organs of our prisoners.

    10. Re:Sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in China (I am not Chinese), you are wrong!

    11. Re:Sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So 4x more attacks observed is comparable? Especially when the sample taken is skewed toward western targets?

    12. Re:Sorry by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Russia is half of that, and Eastern Europe is nowhere to be seen.

    13. Re:Sorry by HiThere · · Score: 1

      You may be correct, but an Anonymous Coward doesn't have much credibility. Do you have any links to evidence?

      Please note, Japan used to be famous for shoddy merchandise. This was a correct reputation, and well earned. At some point this changed, and now their merchandise is more trustworthy than US merchandise.

      China has been, correctly nortorious for shoddy merchandise. And for merchandise where different products are sold with the same description. Has this changed? Any evidence?

      P.S.: I am resident in the US, so I'm only talking about goods purchased via mail-order, and not goods that you can examine prior to purchase. Also, if the quality of these goods has become reliable, it is only wthin the last 3 years.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    14. Re:Sorry by bhcompy · · Score: 1

      Please show me where this rule exists

    15. Re:Sorry by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      It just makes sense.

    16. Re:Sorry by dougisfunny · · Score: 1

      Who are you talking about? The NSA?

      --
      This is not the funny you're looking for.
    17. Re:Sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whats true at one point in time is certainly not true for all.

    18. Re:Sorry by bhcompy · · Score: 1

      According to whom?

    19. Re:Sorry by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      No, China - as funny as it is to point to equivalences with the US, it really doesn't compare to China

    20. Re:Sorry by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Anyone who has been paying attention is aware of the fact that "bots" arent the same as "hackers", and that a huge number of the "hacks" are DDOSes involving bots from all over the world (including the US).

    21. Re:Sorry by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Clearly Im wrong. Lets see, lets have an inventory of the stuff I bought last time I was over there visiting family:

        * 2 Gamecube games (neither work)
        * A "North face" jacket, with already-ripped pull cords, which started falling to pieces almost immediately
        * Some crew socks, which also started falling apart on the first wash cycle
        * A leatherman knockoff which still "works", but the pliers are of very poor quality and a very limited amount of pressure can be used with them
        * Some DVDs, all of which were very clearly not pressed
        * A suitcase which is, so far, holding up quite well
        * Some pearls which appear to be genuine

      2 out of 7 is not terribly good.

    22. Re:Sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My router logs tell a different story. And since I know for a fact that my routers weren't paid off to twist the truth, I think I'll believe the logs over an entity with the political history of Akamai, thanks.

    23. Re:Sorry by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Wild wild East! Enjoy your stay.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    24. Re:Sorry by crimson+tsunami · · Score: 1

      I'll see your made up number.... and raise you an NSA.

    25. Re:Sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was that before or after the NSA modified them?

    26. Re:Sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have production industry?

    27. Re:Sorry by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      According to logic.

    28. Re:Sorry by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Oh, now we are shuffling around the definitions? Please show me the data on "real hacks" then.

    29. Re:Sorry by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. :)

    30. Re:Sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are practically identical.

      One party state with various factions all out to make money for themselves.
      '2 party' state, (that in any other country would be the same party) with various factions al out to make money from themselves.

      Show me where there is any kind of meaningful difference.

    31. Re:Sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "At some point something enters the pool of common knowledge, and you just look ridiculous asking for proof."

      Except, of course, when you find out that the US has been peddling backdoored networking equipment for decades. That makes all the 'common knowledge' look ridiculous.

    32. Re:Sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "So 4x more attacks observed is comparable?"

      When the figures come from a US company (that are still operating under the patriot act) and not from an independend observer then these figures mean exactly what they want them to mean.
      Moreso when it turns out major us networking equipment companies build backdoors into their stuff on request from the US gov.
      These are fantasy figures.

    33. Re:Sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "China is NOTORIOUS for knock-offs that are "good enough" to get sold and then fall to pieces immediately after."

      If you want cheap knock-offs from china, then that is ok.
      If you, however, want to pay a reasonable price and get good components exactly to your specifications from china, than that is also ok.
      It's just that people tend to buy the very very cheapest from china and of course the quality WILL suck. But that is the consumers choise.

    34. Re:Sorry by Anon+Hope+4sweg · · Score: 1

      China is knock off central. They scam and fake so much technology. Wouldnt trust them with anything unless it was brokered by a US company that could give me my money back.

    35. Re:Sorry by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      http://www.symantec.com/threat...

      US is number 2: how can that be explained? If you look, its dominated by the Rustock botnet, which is operated from..... McColo, in Russia.

      Look at botnet operator country-of-origin, and time and again it is eastern europe and China.

      http://www.team-cymru.org/Read...
      According to this report, most Botnet C&C's seem to be located in China, and / or on a .cn TLD. US features prominently mostly because dot-com is such a popular TLD, and is technically a US one-- but that hardly indicates presence in the US. Using a dot-CN domain, on the other hand, almost certainly indicates geographic location in China, which is reflected in their graphs.

      EDIT: However--- I will say that here:
      https://www.shadowserver.org/w...
      Gives me pause for thought. If those stats are accurate, the US has more C&Cs than I realized.

    36. Re:Sorry by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

      If someone from my country rips me off then there's a chance local law enforcement will do something. The nightmare that is international jurisdiction means they won't bother for China.

      Also, stealing $100,000 USD in America is a nice haul, but not really enough to risk as much jail time as it'll get you for actively scamming that many people. In China $100k goes a lot farther, so it's more practical.

      --
      Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  3. Chinese IP Knockoffs Forgo Branding,Now Bypassing by InsultsByThePound · · Score: 0

    the American Corporate middlemen.

    News at 11.

    I prefer to support the original innovators in this case.

  4. Re:limited field of view by fakeid · · Score: 2

    I'm fairly certain he's making a somewhat racist joke regarding eye shape.

  5. Re:Chinese IP Knockoffs Forgo Branding,Now Bypassi by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2

    I prefer to support the original innovators in this case.

    Sooo... Nintendo?

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  6. I wonder... by TWX · · Score: 0

    ...what it won't be able to render. Things like tanks, or student-made banners being waived in squares, or barbecues in major metropolitan areas.

    And if they decide to go cheap on the ambient condition effects, one might be able to see for miles and miles in Beijing!

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  7. Re:i want an oculus rift by Angeret · · Score: 0

    Don't worry, you ain't alone :)

  8. Re:Chinese IP Knockoffs Forgo Branding,Now Bypassi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ivan Sutherland and Bob Sproull?

  9. It's a toss up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The American version restricts you to a Virtual Free Speech Zone, six miles from the event you're protesting.

    So do you want to see virtual tanks, or do you want to be in a virtual cage?

    1. Re:It's a toss up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither, I would rather we give up the stupidity we are currently endorsing. There should be no 'security concerns' from a protest there should be no paperwork to protest. Clearly define the rules of what is allowed (which shouldn't matter if they are protesting something or not this is just a proper conduct in public issue) and when the protesters step over them meet it with deadly force.

      In this case I would be for unlimited protests in any public space.

  10. VR headset not tied to Facebook? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Cheap knock off or not, I'll take one!

    I'd rather support this because ANTVR isn't tied to Facebook. This means I can get VR without giving money to any company tied to Facebook's bottom line and without all my personal data being stolen and sold by Facebook.

    1. Re:VR headset not tied to Facebook? by NeverVotedBush · · Score: 1

      There is also the True Player Games "Totem".

    2. Re:VR headset not tied to Facebook? by Nemyst · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind that Baidu and Alibaba are also the sort of corporation to acquire smaller startups...

    3. Re:VR headset not tied to Facebook? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who's to say they won't sell out in a year's time to another company that is just a bad as Facebook?

    4. Re:VR headset not tied to Facebook? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      When it's supported in Star Citizen, then I'll take it seriously (if not outright purchase one).

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    5. Re:VR headset not tied to Facebook? by AchilleTalon · · Score: 1

      Resistance is futile!

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
  11. Re:Chinese IP Knockoffs Forgo Branding,Now Bypassi by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Oculus Rift VR are not the "original innovators" in any way. they are working atop a ton of previous work and previous products you could buy.

    So when will Raytheon expect your support in VR technology they were one of the "original innovators" of?

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  12. Spying by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 3, Funny

    So the question is will people be more afraid of this Chinese device spying on them or Facebook's Occulus Rift.

  13. Why the hell FOV.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why the hell FOV is always around 100 degree?

    It isn't enough! Give at least 135mm FOV and we are talking. It doesn't need to be perfectly sharp after 115 degree but to have possibility to at least some manner to see what is around you and spot movement is important in simulators. Think like dog fighting in DCS World or sitting in Leopard 2 gunner position in Steel Beasts and you know what I am talking about.

    Of course if that is 90 degree per eye and they are partially crossing so FOV is together around 135mm, then forget my whining (or forget it anyways).

  14. Feature-rich by Crypto+Cavedweller · · Score: 0

    " Interesting technical features include being able to detect whether the ANTVR wearer steps forward, backwards, to the left or to the right, and also whether the wearer believes in Tibetan independence, free trade unions, or an honest examination of the events at Tienanmen."

  15. Open specs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the Kickstarter page:

    Open Source Hardware: The U2B module is open source, so developers can get the signals from the two IMUs (headset and controller) and can make the control command adapt to any device (ie. other gaming systems, UAV or robots). You can potentially even control your Avatar Robot while it's thousands of miles away from you!

    In other words, desktop Linux could be fully supported if a driver is written.

  16. Re:Chinese IP Knockoffs Forgo Branding,Now Bypassi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The virtual boy was ahead of it's time and Nintendo rushed it to release. It would've been good had they spent more time on it.

  17. Re:Japanese subcontract? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

    the slashdot.co.jp faction has modded me Tloll

  18. Competition is great by xtal · · Score: 1

    ..get the damn product finished Oculus.

    --
    ..don't panic
    1. Re:Competition is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do people still seriously consider them after the anal penetration (sorry, money injection) from facebook?

  19. Re:Japanese subcontract? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 0

    No, just normal people.

    Though whether that was for posting a racist comment, or for not even getting the racist comment right, is as yet unclear.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  20. Re:Chinese IP Knockoffs Forgo Branding,Now Bypassi by InsultsByThePound · · Score: 1

    The virtual boy was a concept ahead of it's time with no hope of getting hardware to match up to a good experience. Nice idea, shit execution. Even Oculus rift these days is delayed by waiting for hardware (screens) that can match people's expectations, most notably oled screens with a high enough refresh rate.

    But the VB also didn't have 1/10 of the ideas of oculus rift. It was two screen in a set of goggles. It's like comparing a House from the 1650s to one from today. They do the same basic thing and that's it. It's all different from there on down.

  21. Interesting development by jandrese · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Getting VR right is very difficult. Early VR companies all discovered that not only was the technology not quite there (good VR would have been too expensive), but there are millions of little implementation details that you have to get right as well. Oculus has been struggling with that for years now, but they're finally getting close to a mass market product. I hope this company is as committed to getting the details right and realizes that there is more to the product than the bullet list of features on the box.

    If they aren't careful, this could be like the old days (and some say current day) of smartphones, where you could go to Asia and pick up a phone that had an incredible laundry list of features on the box (full web browser! Tunes AM/FM/TV! Integrated music player! push email! etc...) but none of the features worked right and the interface was a convoluted mess and the thing crashed all of the time.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
    1. Re:Interesting development by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 1

      The technology has been good enough for enthusiasts for years now. I had an eMagin head-mounted display with head-tracking about a decade ago. OR promises to be much better, but the only big issue with the eMagin HMD was that Nvidia stopped supporting it in their very next driver release. Playing F.E.A.R. on the device was awesome and terrifying despite a narrow FOV.

  22. Re:Chinese IP Knockoffs Forgo Branding,Now Bypassi by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    They key innovation here was to get the latency down to something reasonable. Nintendo didn't solve that problem, they just avoided it completely by building the game console and display generator into the "headset" directly. Of course they didn't have any motion ability either, so no latency issues to worry about there either.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  23. Re:limited field of view by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are Chinese, not Japanese.

  24. I like competition by Torp · · Score: 2

    I'll buy a device from whoever stays in bussiness in the next 5-10 years. Kickstart anyone now? No way.
    Sadly I think this is *still* not the time for working VR.

    --
    I apologize for the lack of a signature.
    1. Re:I like competition by beer4duke · · Score: 1

      I'll buy a device from whoever ships a product, and the first one will still be in business in the next 5 years. Bring a product!! Oculus? Valve? Sony? ANTVR?? I do not care anymore: I have already been waiting for too long...

    2. Re:I like competition by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      I disagree. Two things really make VR possible today; the accelerometer, and screen technology. Everything else is trivial hardware and software. Had those two technologies been around 20 years ago, we would still be enjoying awesome fluid VR frame rates with flat shaded polygons. While that experience wouldn't mimic reality, it would be a whole other realm worthy of its own experience.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    3. Re:I like competition by Lockdev · · Score: 1

      You're crazy dude. Have you used even the "old" Oculus Rift? It's safe to say we're well beyond the time for "working" VR. We're in the "holy crap this is getting insanely real" time for VR.

  25. Re:Chinese IP Knockoffs Forgo Branding,Now Bypassi by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    You said you "prefer to support the original innovators." Nintendo was there before Ocululs, thus, Oculus can't be the 'originals.'

    Heck, if you really want to go back to basics, we can't talk about VR without giving proper credit to the pioneers who brought stereoscopic vision to movie-goers almost 100 years ago.

    I can appreciate the innovations that the ANTVR brings to the field of head-mounted displays, without worrying about "who came up with the general concept of VR first." The ANTVR's 'gun' peripheral, for example, sure seems to be something nobody else thought of, Oculus included.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  26. Re:Chinese IP Knockoffs Forgo Branding,Now Bypassi by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    Personally, I think the best part of the ANTVR is the transmutable controller/processing pack/battery pack - a dedicated "gun" peripheral, that's also a dedicated "steering wheel" peripheral, that's also a traditional controller? Oh, and it houses the system's brain and battery as well? Color me pleasantly surprised!

    The WHDI feature sounds pretty cool, too, but I have my reservations about A) how well it will work, and B) how much it adds to the system's overall cost.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  27. Re: It will be better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When the fuck is slashdot going to do something about socko upper accounts modding trolls? News flash for you euro trash: We invented the fucking Internet and this site. Don't like our surveillance, don't use our Internet. Cut the fiber links across the Atlantic. Everything will still work fine for us. I don't think I'd even notice. You guys can have your own Internet. Lol!

  28. Re: It will be better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sock upper accounts. Lol. Someone typing on mobile site.

    I should add: If you like your Internet, you can keep your Internet.

  29. Raising funds on Kickstarter (link) by Meostro · · Score: 1

    Was it too hard to add a link to the ANTVR Kickstarter page?

    1. Re:Raising funds on Kickstarter (link) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was it too hard to add a link to the ANTVR Kickstarter page [kickstarter.com]?

      Yes. Next question.

  30. Re:limited field of view by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No shit? That's, like, the entire joke.

  31. You havent bought a chinese phone lately by voss · · Score: 1

    You can still buy junk really cheap but you can also buy some scary good phones from china now. I own a Lenovo cell phone and its the best cell phone ive ever owned in terms of reliability and performance.

  32. Re:Chinese IP Knockoffs Forgo Branding,Now Bypassi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sega VR: With actual inertial sensors(that Nintendo did not use years after with his VR).

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SOAsr6YzeuU

  33. 1920 x 1080 is what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1920 x 1080, 1 megapixel per eye

    Try 2 megapixels (2073600) per eye. If you're going to post something to a nerd website you really should know how to do basic multiplication, or have editors that actually do their job!

    1. Re:1920 x 1080 is what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The full HD display 1980x1080 is split into two 960 x 1080 squares for each eye: 1069200 pxels or close enough to 1MP per eye as correctly stated.

    2. Re:1920 x 1080 is what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you'd WTFV, you'd see that it's one 1920x1080 display shared across both eyes.

  34. 1 ms latency what? by hitchhacker · · Score: 2
    I believe the summary put a comma in the wrong place...

    9-axis motion detect with low latency (1 ms), wireless communication

    Should be:

    9-axis motion detect, with low latency (1 ms) wireless communication

    The article mentions nothing of 1ms latency head tracking... it does mention the wireless communication latency being 1ms, however. This is a very important distinction as the latency of head tracking is what the Occulus Rift has appeared to have put the most effort into via their custom 3-way merged sensor chip.

    -metric

  35. Re:Chinese IP Knockoffs Forgo Branding,Now Bypassi by hitchhacker · · Score: 1
    via: http://www.oculusvr.com/blog/b...

    The original Oculus Rift prototypes used a sensor that was readily available on the market, but ultimately we decided to develop our own sensor hardware to achieve an optimal experience. With the new Oculus VR sensor, we support sampling rates up to 1000hz, which minimizes the time between the player’s head movement and the game engine receiving the sensor data to roughly 2 milliseconds. The increased sampling rates also reduce orientation error by providing a denser dataset to integrate over, making the player’s real-world movements more in-sync with the game.

    -metric

  36. Re:Chinese IP Knockoffs Forgo Branding,Now Bypassi by romiz · · Score: 1

    You should check some details on the VirtualBoy. As you can see in this teardown, it does not use screens, but oscillating mirrors with a single 1D LED array by eye. Even if it ultimately failed, it is interesting to see.

  37. Chicken VR by beer4duke · · Score: 1

    It seems that chicken are closer to VR than humans: http://www.secondlivestock.com... Chicken are not ok with devkits!!

  38. Not Facebook by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 1

    Any VR headset not attached to Facebook is a win in my eyes.

    F Oculus. Won't touch it as long as Facebook has their hand in it. Pass.

  39. Why not both? by rsborg · · Score: 1

    So the question is will people be more afraid of this Chinese device spying on them or Facebook's Occulus Rift.

    You presume these organizations don't share/sell data to each other then? Only winning move in this scenario is simply not to play.

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  40. Re:Chinese IP Knockoffs Forgo Branding,Now Bypassi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I sounds to me like they are over-promising to get people to buy in. Personally I would reserve me pleasant surprise until they had delivered on all those promises, more or less within the promised time-frame.

  41. Full circle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The panties down liberal mindset has finally fruited - Poor, unemployed Americans to financially back a company from a hostile anti-freedom country that's racist against them - 'mericu

  42. Re:Chinese IP Knockoffs Forgo Branding,Now Bypassi by javilon · · Score: 1

    If by the original innovators you mean Occulus Rift, it doesn't exist as an independent entity anymore. It is Facebook now.

    Do you really want to support Facebook?

    --


    When his defense asked, "Which computer has Jon Johansen trespassed upon?" the answer was: "His own."
  43. Re: It will be better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You didnt invent the WWW part of it though...

  44. Re:limited field of view by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except it was written as a Japanese person would say it.

  45. Re:Chinese IP Knockoffs Forgo Branding,Now Bypassi by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    They are simply a company that is trying to make a high end CHEAP VR goggle and sensor setup.

    you can buy stuff that is better than theirs right now, in fact you have been able to buy better than Oculus Rift's current revision for over 5 years now, It just cost a metric buttload more money.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  46. Re:Japanese subcontract? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

    not racism, just some harmless linguicism if that's a word

    no the mods not normal people, hand wringers with chips on their shoulder looking for something with which to be offended, with some BS idea between their ears about what racism is.

  47. Another reason to get one of these devices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now this is what i call a flight simulator.
    http://m.weibo.cn/1850988623/3712319156347395?sourceType=sms&from=1041595010&wm=3333_1001
    Apologies to those of you who cannot read characters but the gif file is pretty self explanatory.