Slashdot Mirror


Almost 100 Arrested In Worldwide Swoop On Blackshades Malware

MattSparkes (950531) writes "Law enforcement around the world has teamed-up to arrest 97 for buying/using Blackshades malware, which can remotely seize control of a victim's computer, access documents, record keystrokes and even activate their webcam to take surreptitious pictures and video. It is also able to encrypt files in order to extract a ransom for their release. Blackshades RAT is a commercial product costing less than $200 which was marketed as a tool to test network security. However, it is widely used by hackers and was even said by the Electronic Frontier Foundation to have been used against Syrian activists by the government in 2012."

87 comments

  1. it is actually illegal by ganjadude · · Score: 3, Interesting

    to buy and sell a piece of software? what one does with it is obviously a different story, but I didnt think there was anything illegal against buying and selling a piece of software. In true /. fashion, I did not RTFA

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    1. Re:it is actually illegal by ggraham412 · · Score: 1

      I did read the article and was wondering the same thing.

    2. Re:it is actually illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never heard of licensing?

    3. Re:it is actually illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the primary purpose/marketing of the software is for an illegal activity, then yes.

    4. Re:it is actually illegal by gnasher719 · · Score: 0

      to buy and sell a piece of software? what one does with it is obviously a different story, but I didnt think there was anything illegal against buying and selling a piece of software.

      If it teaches a lesson to fucking imbeciles who think it is fun hacking into innocent people's computers, I'm all for them getting locked up. The lesson is that computers are "real world". That unknown people owning these computers are not "slaves" as they like to call them, but real people.

    5. Re:it is actually illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why would software be different from hardware? Take cell phone jammers. Illegal. What if you made an app for iOS that, when activated, jammed all the cell signals within a 500' radius? Is that app illegal? Is the app legal, but the phones illegal once the app is installed? Maybe the phones are illegal only when the app is running, but not when it isn't? Maybe only when the app is in RAM but not sitting on flash? If I take my SD card out, is the phone legal now?

    6. Re: it is actually illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Calm down faggot, take deep breaths.

    7. Re:it is actually illegal by ganjadude · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ahh so its like bongs, if its being sold as a water pipe (network testing tool) its ok, if its being sold as a bong( hacking tool) its not

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    8. Re:it is actually illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one cares what your opinion is if you're too lazy to read the article.

    9. Re:it is actually illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if you bought the software in order to figure out how to block it you should be arrested and thrown in jail? That's bullshit!

    10. Re:it is actually illegal by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      What if you made an app for iOS that, when activated, jammed all the cell signals within a 500' radius?[...] If I take my SD card out, is the phone legal now?

      Nope, if you have an SD card to take out, you're using a KIRF iPhone and it was illegal as soon as it was imported to the US, and always will be. For a slightly different reason though.

    11. Re:it is actually illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that's pretty much how it goes.

    12. Re:it is actually illegal by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Cell phone jammers are illegal to DEPLOY, not illegal to own.

      --
      Good-bye
    13. Re:it is actually illegal by QuasiSteve · · Score: 2

      If you read the article.. then could you point to the exact article that states that selling the software was illegal?

      All I'm reading is raids at people who used the software.

      Though I wouldn't blame them for going after the authors/sellers, given that it's got a template "we encrypted your files, send payment here for decryption key" letter included. That rather sways things well away from the "it's just a network security testing tool" suggestion.

    14. Re:it is actually illegal by Charliemopps · · Score: 4, Informative

      During the course of a worldwide investigation, creators, sellers and users of BlackShades malware were targeted by judicial and law enforcement authorities in 16 different countries.

      http://www.eurojust.europa.eu/...

      So they didn't go after people that bought it. They went after the people that wrote it, sold it or used it. If you bought it but didn't use it, they aren't going after you... yet. I suspect that what happened here was the authors put a backdoor into their backdoor software... which the users should have expected... lol. When they got raided, either law enforcement found it or they made a deal with the authors.

    15. Re:it is actually illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the article says that, at least in the UK, the police only notified purchasers of Blackshades who have yet to use it that they were "known" to law enforcement and that their online activity could/would be monitored. So at least in some jurisdictions not everyone who bought Blackshades were arrested.

    16. Re:it is actually illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They're illegal to market, sell or use:
      http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/jammerenforcement/jamfaq.pdf
      But you're right, if you own one as long as you don't use it it seems ok to possess.

    17. Re:it is actually illegal by QuasiSteve · · Score: 1

      Ha, there it is - thanks for the follow-up!

    18. Re:it is actually illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A spokesperson for the Belgian federal prosecution clearly stated that the possession of the software was illegal and punishable with 6 months to 3 years in jail by Belgian law.

    19. Re:it is actually illegal by Redmancometh · · Score: 1

      An online friend of mine in Belgium has been arrested in the last week. We do not know exactly why he was arrested, but it appears that this is the reason. We know he purchased this piece of software, and we are fairly certain he did not use it..I think he wanted to pull it apart.

      Very frightening stuff indeed.

    20. Re:it is actually illegal by chuckugly · · Score: 2

      I did read the article and was wondering the same thing.

      The National Crime Agency (NCA) also said in a statement that it is aware of more people in the UK who bought the software but are yet to use it. It is working to warn them that "they are now known to the agency" and that "any movement into criminality will result in further action".

    21. Re:it is actually illegal by chuckugly · · Score: 1

      Cell phone jammers are legal, jamming cell phones is illegal. There is a difference.

    22. Re:it is actually illegal by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      keep us updated on your friend, Id love to know how everything goes down. Hopefully they arent to hard on him

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    23. Re:it is actually illegal by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      Kosovo?

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    24. Re:it is actually illegal by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      cared enough to make a post....

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    25. Re:it is actually illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's more like like guns. OK for defense (IE Pen testing) not ok for random drive-bys (Hacking)...

    26. Re:it is actually illegal by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      Yeah, he just wanted to pull it apart to figure out how he could use it to cure cancer and save the children. Protip: play with fire, get burnt.

    27. Re:it is actually illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They better round up everyone at kaspersky, mcafee, norton.... etc...

    28. Re:it is actually illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on the country, in many European countries you may have it (and even sell or buy it) as long as it is not functional. Not functional can mean that the antenna is not screwed on and sold in a separate package (this was tested in court even)

    29. Re:it is actually illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cure cancer and save the children

      Sounds exactly like the reasons for which people buy guns.

  2. and yet... by slashmydots · · Score: 0

    And yet the biggest criminals responsible for the vast majority of the world's malware are sitting at Perion Network, in a lovely building in Redmond, Washington. They must have bribed the entire fucking government to do what they do without the SWAT time shutting them down. If it was up to me, I'd arrest everyone and then a drone would destroy their building.

  3. NSA by eedwardsjr · · Score: 3, Funny

    "For internal use only"

    1. Re:NSA by ThaumaTechnician · · Score: 1

      "Shakes fist"... Dang, beat me to it!

    2. Re:NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      When are they going to arrest the NSA, GCHQ, or the other nation-state adversaries doing this exact same thing?

      Do we need to catch them and report them to the police first?

      People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.

      Also, don't build glass houses. Or throw stones.

  4. Today's Best Slashvertisement? by mythosaz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How many of you thought, "Hey, only $200...hmmmm?"

    Be honest.

    I wonder what this particular Slashvertisement cost to buy?

    1. Re:Today's Best Slashvertisement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It uses a shitty non-standard font to disrupt the user's browser. -1 mods seem to disable the problem, though.

    2. Re:Today's Best Slashvertisement? by tiberus · · Score: 1

      Chances are you'd get a faster response from Google.

    3. Re:Today's Best Slashvertisement? by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Your tinfoil hat's width would stop an ICBM.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    4. Re:Today's Best Slashvertisement? by InsultsByThePound · · Score: 3, Informative

      I thought, "I bet I can google this and get it for free." I was right.

    5. Re:Today's Best Slashvertisement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hard enough to trust malware that you paid for, how trustworthy do you think a "free" copy that you managed to find will be?

    6. Re:Today's Best Slashvertisement? by mspohr · · Score: 1

      How do you "trust" any malware?

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    7. Re:Today's Best Slashvertisement? by canadiannomad · · Score: 1

      You trust it on a virtual machine, on a honey pot host, in a virtual network, that is disconnected from any other system...

      --
      Hmm, the humour and sarcasm seem to have been be lost on you.
    8. Re:Today's Best Slashvertisement? by chuckugly · · Score: 1

      I looked for it. If I could trust it (hahahahahaha) it would be really useful for remotely fixing computers for all the people who expect me to fix their computers. But as I was digging around I decided anything that hard to buy isn't going to be trustworthy. I'll stick to log me in.

    9. Re:Today's Best Slashvertisement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arker's a faggot who will blame your browser settings for rendering his tt tags in monospaced font. Likewise, if you see random monospaced words in this post, it's because I responded to faggot Arker's thread.

      While he's right that browser settings can prevent this, he doesn't acknowledge that he goes out of his way to wrap all of his posts in tt tags so that he can feel special. Which is why Arker is a stupid little faggot. Only slightly removed from APK's use of formatting. At least APK's posts make me laugh or at least smile on a bad day.

    10. Re:Today's Best Slashvertisement? by JazzLad · · Score: 2

      Or any computer at the local Best Buy ...

      --
      "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
  5. its a commercial trojan by nimbius · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    which is very different than Microsoft's forensic tool COFEE which is also used by a government that runs a prison torture camp in Cuba for freedom. in a totally patrio-tastic way this tool is used to investigate unamericans like Moxie Marlinspike which is also super extremely legal.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  6. Same old story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The mafia taking down a competitor encroaching on their territory

  7. Windows is not the only OS out there by ruir · · Score: 2

    So please, write Windows computers and not just computers. Thank you.

    1. Re:Windows is not the only OS out there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go take a shower.

    2. Re:Windows is not the only OS out there by cdrudge · · Score: 4, Funny

      Anyone who you would want to stalk, read their dirty emails, and see naked via a spycam is using Windows. Or possibly a Mac. I REALLY don't think you want to see the average Linux user naked and/or blackmail them for dirty pictures.

    3. Re:Windows is not the only OS out there by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Even counting only OEM commercial products, the Unix variants in my house far outnumber the Windows boxes.

      --
      Good-bye
    4. Re:Windows is not the only OS out there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, yeah, but it is so refreshing to see a third party actually write, buy and sell a RAT. I always thought that the best RAT is Microsoft Internet Explorer, but it seems that there actually are others.

    5. Re:Windows is not the only OS out there by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      Don't you know that on Slashdot, you can attack Mac OS X, iOS, Linux and Android, but you can't say a word about the holy gaming-OS?

    6. Re:Windows is not the only OS out there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even counting you and other at-home Linux users, the Windows variants used by home users far outnumbers you and the other neckbeards.

    7. Re:Windows is not the only OS out there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was probably referring more to iOS or Android devices than Linux boxes. Include those, you'll probably get more "OEM commercial products" with Unix variants than you get Windows boxes in the average household.

    8. Re:Windows is not the only OS out there by HiThere · · Score: 1

      No. Please write "MSWindows computers". Microsoft does not own the trademark on windows in English speaking countries. It is a common word in descriptive use and is therefore not eligible for trademark protection.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    9. Re:Windows is not the only OS out there by haploc · · Score: 1

      I REALLY don't think you want to see the average Linux user naked and/or blackmail them for dirty pictures.

      One of the few examples where 'security through obscurity' does work.

    10. Re:Windows is not the only OS out there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it is more like a case of "security through obesity" :p

  8. BackOrifice anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back in the days...

    1. Re:BackOrifice anyone? by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 1

      As a teen, I remember actually getting some bozo on IRC to install BO on his PC for me. Social engineering is so fun. Dem were the days.

    2. Re:BackOrifice anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      er, I'm totally a hot chick, my pic is an exe, here's the link, just run it! kkthx /hax

    3. Re:BackOrifice anyone? by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      As a teen, I remember actually getting some bozo on IRC to install BO on his PC for me. Social engineering is so fun. Dem were the days.

      That's called "dehumanizing the victim". It wasn't a human being, it was a bozo, so it was alright.

  9. Took Long Enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yay, finally hacking is bad.

  10. Too bad you didn't RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TFA apparently has a upskirt panty picture of 19-year-old Miss Teen USA Cassidy Wolf.

  11. What? by no-body · · Score: 1

    Only 100 - that can't be. NSA is not that understaffed!

    1. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The NSA doesn't enforce laws, silly.

    2. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, they're in the business of breaking or bending them... ; )

  12. Xzibit named as mastermind behind scheme by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    I suspect that what happened here was the authors put a backdoor into their backdoor software...

    Yo dawg, I herd you like backdoors, so we put a backdoor in your backdoor so you can.... er, sod it, you can probably guess the rest yourselves. :-/

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  13. Any different? by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 1

    How is this any different from something like GoToMyPc.COM or Join.Me ????

    Should I be worried now that I use join.me to invite friends to see what I'm doing, or use it to help friends having trouble?

    A piece of software's intended functions should not be viewed as good or bad, it's simply a tool. You can club some one over the head with a monkey wrench and kill them. Does that mean this tool has no legitimate uses?

    "Shall the clay say to him that fashioneth it, What makest thou?"

    1. Re:Any different? by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      Because Join.Me instalsl itself silently on a remote host, uses your webcam without your permission, encrypts your files without you knowing then sends you a ransom note asking for money. Good comparison Einstein. Please tell, what legitimate legal purpose do you foolishly believe this software could possibly serve?

  14. But is this illegal in the US... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it is, then I find it interesting that there are other people legally allowed to remotely access computers without the user's awareness/permissions. Surely if this is illegal behavior for some people under a governing body, then it must be illegal for others under a governing body.fullstop. Not talking about holding encrypted files for ransom though. If this was wrongly used by the Syrian government in 2012, what stops other software which isn't accessible to the public that does many of the same things from being used by a government secretly, what if that government doesn't have oversight????? :0

  15. Elimination competition by citizenr · · Score: 1

    raids sponsored by Vupen :)

    --
    Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
  16. A hair dresser needs a license to cut hair by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

    A hair dresser needs a license to cut hair But people who write this kinda software need nothing??? doesn't make any since to me. This kinda software has zero business in the public domain stop giving the criminals tools for free. And that is IMO

    --
    Jack of all trades,master of none
  17. Re:Windowss is not the only OS out there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember hearing years ago that Paris Hilton had copyright over the phrase "That's hot". Would have thought this phrase had the same protection.

  18. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  19. Victim's computer malware? by lippydude · · Score: 1

    "Law enforcement around the world has teamed-up to arrest 97 for buying/using Blackshades malware, which can remotely seize control of a victim's computer"

    What Operating System does this malware run on, or aren't we allowed to mention Microsoft Windows. ref

  20. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Law enforcement has fully gone mental. hacking is not illegal, it never was & never will be. the correct word is "Cracking".

  21. Windows is the only one worth using by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It does the most.

    1. Re:Windows is the only one worth using by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1 core for the AV, 1 core for the malware that comes from the vendor, other core for the malware you got while jacking off to gay sites, and other for your game...Yep, it does the most.

    2. Re:Windows is the only one worth using by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's 2/12 possible real or ht cores. Rest go to games you can't play anyplace else, commercial quality software not available on other platforms, as well as drivers for most any computer hardware there is (which always has drivers ready for windows since it is the most used operating system there is under the sun on pc's and servers bar none). How about your OS of choice?

  22. This is Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just because they are "arrested" doesn't mean that they gonna serve any jail time or pay any restitution.

    Gotta laugh on the US, they think they can just jail everybody everywhere. If you gonna continue this trend we gonna beat you americans with a stick when you come to our countries as tourists and yeah you could say that not everybody agrees with what the us gov does but most of them do!
    The countries justice systems are reflected by their own citizens. In the US they really want to jail you for 10 years for speeding.

    FBI really neaded a lot of brain to pull all the records of the sellers paypal account ... and then what they put up the statement that OMG these made 350k in sales. I doubt that they even made 35k. Hackers are mostly poor people and kids, they don't have money.

    On the other hand I don't feel sorry for them because there are hundreds of free RATs (Remote Administration Tools) out there in the wild and if you don't like them you can code your own. Why to buy any.

  23. Re:Windowss is not the only OS out there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember hearing years ago that Paris Hilton had copyright over the phrase "That's hot". Would have thought this phrase had the same protection.

    Trademark. That's a trademark, not a copyright. There is a huge difference.

  24. UHG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    great job slashdot, you just told all the script kiddies what to download next

  25. monitoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We are not safe any more, even the government is spying on the citizens. The hackers also want to use BlackShades to hack our computers. With that said, micro keylogger is not a scam at all.