Slashdot Mirror


Ohio Prison Shows Pirated Movies To Inmates

An anonymous reader writes "Richard Humphrey was sentenced to 29 months in prison for selling pirated copies of movies through the subscription-based USAWAREZ.com. He was later sent to the Lorain County prison in February for a parole violation and while he was a prisoner, he says guards showed inmates Ride Along and The Wolf of Wall Street before they were released on DVD. A spokesperson for Lorain County Correctional Institution Warden Kimberly Clipper said prison officials are aware that pirated movies are being shown to prisoners and the issue is being investigated. But she said she couldn't comment further because the investigation is ongoing."

26 of 186 comments (clear)

  1. Odd Selection by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is The Wolf of Wall Street the kind of movie you should be showing prisoners anyways?

    1. Re:Odd Selection by SJHillman · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you want violent felons to have any hope of being rehabilitated, you need to show them what true criminals look like.

    2. Re:Odd Selection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Is The Wolf of Wall Street the kind of movie you should be showing prisoners anyways?

      Well, probably better Tango and Cash, Demolition Man, or Escape from Alcatraz.

    3. Re:Odd Selection by GTRacer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Are you thinking what I'm thinking, that TWoWS is cruel and unusual punishment?

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    4. Re:Odd Selection by Idarubicin · · Score: 4, Informative

      You do realize that 'voluntary Ritalin usage" is another way of say methamphetamine abuse.

      Well no, it's not, actually. The active ingredient in Ritalin, methylphenidate is quite distinct, chemically, from amphetamine, methamphetamine, or any of the related close derivatives. While methylphenidate and methamphetamine both start with the same four letters, their biochemical effects are different. (For example, both compounds are dopamine reuptake inhibitors, but only methamphetamine is a dopamine releasing agent. The two compounds have opposite effects on neuronal firing rates. And so forth.)

      --
      ~Idarubicin
  2. Re:Perfect! by Scutter · · Score: 4, Funny

    They should show them pirated pirate movies.

    --

    "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
  3. oh yeah... by Connie_Lingus · · Score: 4, Informative

    as some of you know, i've spent time in the florida prison system...this stuff is SOP...prisons are basically just the streets with much higher prices.

    imo, its great that inmates get to watch illegal movies, brought in the guards, while smoking their illegal weed, often brought in by the guards (and of course through other less...sanitary? ways), while talking on their illegal cell phones, often brought in by...well, you already know.

    it's all mostly a big game...now i'm not saying people don't belong in prison, lord knows i've met plenty who do, but a dude running a pirate movie site?

    not really, imho at least.

    --
    never bring a twinkie to a food fight.
    1. Re:oh yeah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      1) :)
      2) ;)
      3) ???
      4) Free movies!

  4. Re:Apples and Oranges by wisnoskij · · Score: 5, Informative

    If it is a for profit prison, this actually would be showing pirated movies for profit.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
  5. Re:Perfect! by Blue+Stone · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Can you imagine if you were in jail on copyright infringement charges and the prison you were in was showing pirated movies?

    --
    Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
  6. Ride Along? by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow; that *is* cruel and unusual punishment.

  7. Re:Apples and Oranges by jeffmeden · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well if the prison guards are actually showing pirated movies, it isn't piracy for profit, but it isn't exactly piracy for personal use either.

    Given that the prisons in Ohio are privatized, yes anything provided to the inmates would be legally and practically "for profit". Still not sure why they would bother offering them anything but super old DVDs and VHS movies that have been scrapped at the local library, but one thing that comes to mind is a guard curtailed a favor from an inmate in exchange for something recent to watch. It will be interesting to see if the investigation turns anything up.

  8. Re:Fair Use by Torp · · Score: 5, Informative

    I don't think that's considered fair use :) It's pretty much illegal. Even if they bought a legal DVD, they're not licensed for public performances.

    --
    I apologize for the lack of a signature.
  9. Re:Prison == New Free Cinema? by deadweight · · Score: 4, Informative

    Prison is not suppoed to be torture. Why not let them kick back and watch a movie? If you give them nothing to do, they will think up their own entertainment and it might not be good.

  10. Re:Perfect! by sconeu · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm guessing those are rated Arrr?

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  11. Re:Difference by mi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Don't try to sell them and you're mostly in the clear.

    Generally, you are right — the particular prisoner's case is different. However — content-owners have tried to make "non-profit" infringers (people making copyrighted material available for free to others) into examples by suing them for large sums of money (though no jail-time).

    And second, the prison officials aren't just watching the material themselves — they are showing it to a large number of people (entire prison population). This is something, which you can not legally do even with a DVD you purchased in a store — they are only licensed for private viewing.

    They should be busted and, ideally, someone ought to end up in the cell next to the protagonist — even if for a shorter sentence.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  12. Re:Prison == New Free Cinema? by rogoshen1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've wondered why we don't allow prisoners to play some kind of FPS (or ideally MMO) type games in prisons, and let them sort out their turf wars and aggression using that.

    -- quite a few MMO players live very similar to convicts, in that they stay isolated in their cell for 20 hours a day.
    -- shanking someone in a game would be far better than in real life.

    Putting people in a confined space with no outlet and nothing to do for 20 hours a day -- and those who didn't already have violent or criminal tendencies will have them in short order. And the recreation they do find will not be something we want them to be doing.

  13. Re:Not neccessarily pirated by sjames · · Score: 4, Informative

    From TFA:

    In some cases, Humphrey said the movies appeared to have been illegally recorded by theater-goers. "You could see people walking in front of the camera," he said.

    That's a pretty good sign it's not legit.

  14. Re:Other ways to get movies by sjames · · Score: 3, Informative

    They were cammed. According to TFA, you could see members of the audience occasionally blocking the movie.

  15. Re:Difference by John.Banister · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ask the owner of any bar about people wanting money for "public performance" of copyrighted entertainment.

  16. Re:Difference by mi · · Score: 5, Informative

    The code clearly states that distributions by unauthorized person is a crime. charging is irrelevant.

    False. Though all unauthorized distribution is illegal, not all of it constitutes a criminal offense. To make the perpetrator a felon, according to paragraphs; 506 federal Title 17 of the United States Code, the distribution must be committed:

    1. for purposes of commercial advantage or private financial gain;
    2. by the reproduction or distribution, including by electronic means, during any 180-day period, of 1 or more copies or phonorecords of 1 or more copyrighted works, which have a total retail value of more than $1,000; or
    3. by the distribution of a work being prepared for commercial distribution, by making it available on a computer network accessible to members of the public, if such person knew or should have known that the work was intended for commercial distribution.

    Our protagonist qualifies for the first item above. And so do his current jailers. Small-time non-profit distributors — such as torrent-users, who keep the stuff they just downloaded available, but not for long enough to qualify for the second case — do not.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  17. Re:Difference by nabsltd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is something, which you can not legally do even with a DVD you purchased in a store — they are only licensed for private viewing.

    Although there is wording on DVDs to the effect that they are "licensed", this is not true. If you purchase a copy, you own that copy and retain all first-sale rights.

    The actual phrasing in 17 USC concerns "public performance". If these DVDs had been legally purchased (instead of definitely pirated), it's possible the prison performance would not be considered "public". After all, can you just walk in and watch movies with the prisoners? Remember that size of audience is unimportant for determining "private" or "public". A wedding with 500 guests where only people with invitations are allowed in is "private", while a bar with seating for 3 people is "public".

  18. Re:Not neccessarily pirated by Calydor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Showing CAM rips?

    That's gotta count as cruel and unusual punishment.

    --
    -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
  19. Re:Perfect! by tie_guy_matt · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just don't show them the pirate movie "cutthroat island" ( http://business.time.com/2012/... .) After all, cruel and unusual punishment is unconstitutional!

  20. Re:Difference by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Informative

    Although there is wording on DVDs to the effect that they are "licensed", this is not true. If you purchase a copy, you own that copy and retain all first-sale rights.

    The actual phrasing in 17 USC concerns "public performance".

    If, indeed, I can do anything I want with the purchased DVD, as you claimed at the beginning, then this part becomes irrelevant, no?

    The fact that the DVDs are sold, not licensed, means that the copyright holder does not have the legal authority to impose extra conditions upon the buyer.

    The "public performance" provision, however, is imposed not by the copyright holder but rather by the law itself. That's where the difference lies.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  21. Re:Not neccessarily pirated by TemporalBeing · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It is possible that the Ohio prison in question got itself listed as a budget theater and was able to get legal copies of those movies between the main theatrical release and the DVD release.

    I find that highly unlikely, but it is possible.

    Don't have to get listed; just have to give enough money to the distribution companies. If you have your own copy then you can also get a discount - e.g they charge extra to send you a copy to use that you then have to return. How much you pay depends on how well you can haggle the price; can easily be $350 (with DVD) or $700 PER film. Funny thing is, if you try to reach out and cannot get any traction then you've also done your "due diligence" and can just go ahead and show it - been there with Disney licensed Anime films. (We had a budget, wanted to pay them, but couldn't get anyone to stand up and take the money.)

    So even if they did do a cam rip (probably bit torrent copy from somewhere), they very well may have had a license to show it.

    And, at least in the Anime world, many of the distribution companies will even let you do it for free (e.g Pioneer, RightStuf) if you show all the ads they have on the DVDs and have asked them for permission to do so.

    --
    Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)