Slashdot Mirror


Study: Stop Being So Cynical, You Could Give Yourself Dementia

concertina226 (2447056) writes "Scientists from the University of Eastern Finland have found that people who have high levels of cynical distrust are three times as likely to suffer from dementia in later life, than those who have more faith in other people. Their study is the first of its kind to look at the relationship between cynicism and dementia. Entitled: 'Late-life cynical distrust, risk of incident dementia, and mortality in a population-based cohort', it is published in the latest issue of the journal Neurology. Over a period of eight years, the researchers studied 1,499 people, who all had an average age of 71. The participants were given tests for dementia and a questionnaire to measure their level of cynicism, based on the Cook-Medley Scale."

153 comments

  1. There's a relationship... by Morphine007 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... but is it cause and effect? Or effect and effect? Could the very high levels of cynical distrust be a result of some malady that eventually causes the dementia?

    1. Re:There's a relationship... by AmazingRuss · · Score: 1

      It's probably because the robots stole their medicine.

    2. Re:There's a relationship... by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 2

      The study ends with "more research needed", so it really hasn't proven anything, let alone cause and effect.

      Of course, that doesn't prevent people from mentioning correlation and causation to feel smarter. Obviously the headline is from the article author, and has nothing to do with the study. Just as obviously, "could" is used precisely because the link is only demonstrated, not understood.

      That said, cynical people rarely exercise their brains to understand the world, and that lack of use mirrors other pathways to dementia. A little critical thinking every day is good for you, certainly. Jumping to the obvious "cos corporate interests" or "duh NSA" is no brain work at all.

      Pay attention to the cynical responses here and elsewhere, and it will make sense shortly. Of course, making sense does not also make something true. But it is a step better than being written off as correlation and therefore unworthy of news or discussion.

    3. Re:There's a relationship... by SpankiMonki · · Score: 1

      Look, everyone knows robots eat old people's medicine for fuel. If they didn't have an Old Glory plan, that's their problem.

    4. Re:There's a relationship... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 0

      That said, cynical people rarely exercise their brains to understand the world,

      Care to expound on that? Because it seems dubious - from what I can tell, even Einstein was a fairly cynical dude:

      “Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.”

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    5. Re:There's a relationship... by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      Think of all the governments, corporations and rich people that'd profit from THIS!

    6. Re:There's a relationship... by bluegutang · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd guess that cynical or distrustful people end up with lesser social connections to other people, a factor which has already been linked to dementia.

    7. Re:There's a relationship... by XARG · · Score: 3, Funny

      ... but is it cause and effect? Or effect and effect? Could the very high levels of cynical distrust be a result of some malady that eventually causes the dementia?

      You have just increased your dementia chances.

    8. Re:There's a relationship... by uncqual · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You are confusing being "cynical" with having a "closed mind".

      I suspect cynical people likely think things through more than those who are very trusting.

      Those that are very trusting don't see a need to question and think deeply about things other people say, do, or offer (which is why they end up falling for various scams) until after they get screwed and then, in my experience, they don't learn much from it. Cynics, on the other hand, don't accept something to be true just because someone said it and therefore have to evaluate and think about most everything they hear -- making them think and exercise their brains. Also, when they get screwed in spite of their due caution, they tend to think back as to what they missed about the situation that would have prevented them from getting into it.

      Of course, you probably shouldn't trust my insight on this as, being a cynic, I am probably biased (but only cynics will understand that or care about that).

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
    9. Re:There's a relationship... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just remember, it's not really dementia if the world has gone crazy.

    10. Re:There's a relationship... by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      No, there is no cause and effect relationship determined. It seems likely to me that the same condition that predisposes one to mental stresses/cynicism also could impact overall health.

      In order to demonstrate cause and effect, they would need a control group of cynics, half of which somehow changed their outlook to a positive/trusting one, the other half remaining cynics, and then see if results differ. I somehow doubt that can be pulled off.

    11. Re:There's a relationship... by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      The brain suffers atrophy when not exercised. So when a person becomes cynical, they become pessimistic and and eventually apathetic. I believe that apathy is what causes atrophy of the brain. Just let go... Nothing else matters.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    12. Re:There's a relationship... by jelIomizer · · Score: 1

      That said, cynical people rarely exercise their brains to understand the world

      What makes you think so? People often call me cynical, but really, I just take history and logic into account. When I decide if it would be a good idea for the government to have a certain power, I recall some history to see if anything similar was abused in the past, or if the power would be easily abused.

      It seems people often accuse people who use their brains of being "cynical."

      Jumping to the obvious "cos corporate interests" or "duh NSA" is no brain work at all.

      And yet, for some things, that is probably the answer.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    13. Re:There's a relationship... by matbury · · Score: 1

      ...and the divorce rate in Maine correlates directly with margarine consumption, and the number of people who drowned by falling into a swimming pool correlated with the number of films Nicholas Cage appeared in, etc.

      Correlation isn't causation: http://www.fastcodesign.com/30...

    14. Re:There's a relationship... by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      Non-cynical people are also known as "gullible".

      They probably believe silly things like "the US government is the 'good guys'", "the police are good guys with just a few bad apples and don't violate peoples' rights on a regular basis", "corporations are run by good people who want to improve society", etc.

    15. Re:There's a relationship... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Apathy is what happens when the cynical person gets old enough to realize they have no power to change things for the better. The root of the problem is the non-cynical people who support the corruption in society, causing the cynical people to be cynical in the first place and eventually give up.

    16. Re:There's a relationship... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably effect and effect if the paranoid SlashDerps are any indication. It's clear that many people here have cognitive difficulties leading to severe mistrust of their own elected officials.

      This is also seen in Conservatives who share the same paranoia regarding government, and say all kinds of idiotic things. It's all poor-quality brains.

    17. Re:There's a relationship... by hey! · · Score: 2

      Well, here's one possible effect and cause scenario that occurred to me.

      Start with a healthy person who has a generally positive view of humanity. That doesn't mean he believes every human is good and honest; he relies on his critical thinking to know when an offer is too good to be true and his social perception to sense when someone is trying to put one over on him.

      Now give him some brain damage so that his critical thinking and social perception don't work so well any longer. How does he react? He falls back on simple, generalized rules. Since he can no longer tell a dishonest man or scheme from an honest one, he takes the default position that everyone and everything is dishonest.

      You can see this at operation in the country. I've lived over fifty years in this country and cynicism is at an all-time high. But strangely enough, so is credulity. We've become a nation of cynical suckers.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    18. Re:There's a relationship... by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      I agree - and another question is what about being cynical for certain subjects - like politics?

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    19. Re:There's a relationship... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problem here is that the folks interviewed were already 71 when asked about their cynicism level.

      Paranoia is a symptom of alzheimers, some folks toward the end getting violently paranoid.

      The more interesting study would need to be prospective. It's possible someone's got a cohort who were interviewed in middle age or earlier who are now starting to develop the disease, and that there are questions they were asked that are germane to these findings.

    20. Re:There's a relationship... by cyn1c77 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'd guess that cynical or distrustful people end up with lesser social connections to other people, a factor which has already been linked to dementia.

      I'd guess that the cynicism is an early manifestation of dementia in the people who manifest dementia!

      How do we tell who is right in proper peer-reviewed fashion?

    21. Re:There's a relationship... by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps they're willing to give all of the above a chance first rather than outright assuming they're inherently up to no good at every possible turn.

    22. Re:There's a relationship... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      They've already proven over and over again that they're up to no good at every possible turn.

    23. Re:There's a relationship... by TeknoHog · · Score: 1
      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    24. Re:There's a relationship... by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      I think that statement is every bit as accurate for individual people as it is for all of the above groups you mentioned.

      These groups are every bit as capable as being good or bad as individuals. That isn't being gullible, that is just reality. If you only choose to acknowledge the criminal element, then THAT truly is cynicism.

      If you accept that one of them is just as likely to rip you off as they are to help you as your neighbor is, then you aren't being gullible, you're being reasonable.

      If the study holds true, I'd consider changing your viewpoint. I've seen people with dementia, and I'd very much hate to be them.

    25. Re:There's a relationship... by bluegutang · · Score: 2

      How do we tell who is right in proper peer-reviewed fashion?

      Well, my comment got modded up higher than yours... :)

    26. Re:There's a relationship... by Stuarticus · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, you're totally right. How do you feel now, cynical or gullible?

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
    27. Re:There's a relationship... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen the US government help anyone except the 0.01%ers in quite a while. This isn't true of every government in the world; there's lots of countries that seem to do OK with regards to the regular people in their populations, but not the US. (Those countries are in Western Europe BTW, and as a result, they rank at the top of the quality-of-living indices year after year.) The government here only screws over the common people. I don't see how that's one bit cynical; it's just recognizing reality.

    28. Re:There's a relationship... by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      I think you are confusing cynicism with skepticism.
      Skeptics say "no, I won't take your word for it" while cynics say
      "if you don't know somebody, assume they're an asshole".

    29. Re:There's a relationship... by aaronb1138 · · Score: 1

      How about the hallmarks for what qualifies as dementia...

      It's dementia when they are stealing your medicine.

      It's sweet old lady / kind delusions when they tell you how much they love the cake you brought them last week for their birthday (who is this person? --just go with it).

    30. Re:There's a relationship... by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      On the contrary, having a view that the so called 1% are your enemies is not only cynical, it also means you're very greedy.

  2. Pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read the actual study. It's a possible correlation (of a very few people). There is no clear indication of causation.

  3. Correlation is not causation by gweihir · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Seems these people and the OP have already given themselves stupidity...

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:Correlation is not causation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arghhh. I have this news story all over my facebook and I wrote the same thing. What if cynicism is just an early warning sign of dementia? It doesn't mean if you decrease cynicism that you decrease dementia. (Of course that COULD be true, but we'd need a controlled study to prove that.)

    2. Re:Correlation is not causation by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2, Informative

      Seems these people and the OP have already given themselves stupidity...

      To be fair, the causation implied by the idiotic headline in both the summary, and TFA, did not come from the study. The authors were very careful to say that the effects were only "associated".

    3. Re:Correlation is not causation by nospam007 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "What if cynicism is just an early warning sign of dementia?"

      We used to call it a cranky old fart.

    4. Re:Correlation is not causation by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Seems these people and the OP have already given themselves stupidity...

      To be fair, the causation implied by the idiotic headline in both the summary, and TFA, did not come from the study. The authors were very careful to say that the effects were only "associated".

      Presumably, the same way owning a car and getting audited by the IRS are "associated."

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  4. Self fulfilling prophecy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Reading about bogus 'studies' like this makes me more cynical than ever, thus giving me dementia.

    1. Re:Self fulfilling prophecy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CHEER UP FFS!

    2. Re:Self fulfilling prophecy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reading about bogus 'studies' like this makes me more cynical than ever, thus giving me dementia.

      You should be cynical about science reporting that makes headlines that have little or nothing to do with actual studies, instead.

  5. Ill just take this with a pinch of salt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As having not read TFA Ive no idea what they are trying to sell me

    1. Re:Ill just take this with a pinch of salt by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1
      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  6. That's just what they want you to think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...those sneaky bastards.

  7. That explains Fox News' audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damned if you do, damned if you don't in my opinion.

  8. I find that hard to believe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, wait what was I talking about?

  9. Meh by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just about all studies are crap anyway. Why would this one be any different?

    1. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haa haa, funny :)

    2. Re:Meh by AnontheDestroyer · · Score: 1

      So is your response. So are all these responses! So is your response.

    3. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cui bono?

  10. Or maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ... all those cynical bastards were faking dementia just to fuck with the study.

  11. Why? by andywest · · Score: 1

    Why should one not be cynical? The human race has never given cause for one to be otherwise. Besides, cynicism is not necessarily related to hostility or anger, which makes the Cook-Medley test nonsensical.

    Unless, of course, that the study calls 'cynicism' is not cynicism at all.

    --
    --- Andy West http://andywest.org
    1. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I agree. Humans are shitty evil little things. I don't trust them one bit. I don't even talk to them anymore. At least, not in person.

    2. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the saddest thing I've ever heard.

    3. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Evidence indicates it's the other way 'round: cynicism is related to intelligence. The higher the IQ, the higher the rate of depression due to "human nature"; contemplating and understanding of what humans are, and how we ultimately "work", sets off the chain-reaction leading to depression. It appears to me that 'cynicism' and 'depression related to existential views' would be the same--or at least closely related--mechanisms.

    4. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Smarmy fuck.

    5. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, interesting. Maybe I was too quick with my comment. I certainly can see that side to it, too.

    6. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you know what 'smarmy' means?

    7. Re:Why? by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 2

      A prejudice towards cynicism, that is pre judgement before the facts are known, robs you of the opportunity to process and analyze new info. If every fact were dismissed as "selfish bastards", you would be in the same pattern of disuse as anyone else on the path to dementia.

      Controlling for various thing means that of the people who use their brain in similar ways, cynics who process less information developed more symptoms of disuse.

      Dismissing these results without consideration may have been humor, but it matches the dismissive cynic well enough that the replies and moderation do not currently recognize it as such, which is why it deserves a response.

    8. Re:Why? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      You should have claimed the comment was satire, because for satire it's pretty good.

      Now knowing that you were not being satirical, I have to wonder about your logical process... Do you make a habit of saying stuff about topics you're completely ignorant of? To wit, anyone who's heard anything Torvalds has said publicly would know that he's clearly a very cynical person.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    9. Re:Why? by hoboroadie · · Score: 1

      I don't have cynical distrust, I have cynical disdain. I believe incompetence explains more of the problems that we have than actual malignant evil. That's not to say that Human Society and the Entire World is not being ruined by them, but its only a very few doing the real harm.

      --
      They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
    10. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you talk to your cats and plants every day. That would explain your vocabulary.

    11. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, loneliness will do that to you. It's not like I don't have a deep desire for human interaction; rather, I know where it leads, and that it is ultimately not worth it.

    12. Re:Why? by xevioso · · Score: 1

      But it is bad for you. Loneliness, especially in older adults, has been shown to have negative health impacts.

    13. Re:Why? by xevioso · · Score: 1

      I believe it is an adjective describing how jelly or marmalade feels on bread?

      "I accidentally misplaced my hand while making a peanut-butter and jelly sandwich and now it feels all smarmy."

    14. Re:Why? by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      I'd agree.
      And unless they learn how to treat and cure it before then, I'm screwed in about 25 to 35 years. My mom had dementia on top of that, so I have a genetic predisposition to boot.
      Which ironically, while cynical, is also somewhat optimistic as I think they will probably make progress on that front.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    15. Re:Why? by Nephandus · · Score: 2

      There are things worse than death. Unsurprisingly, the acute ones require life. The chronic ones require time. Living longer just facilitates more acute and chronic negatives, often with less and less likely positives. Basically, there's rarely a point in being an old cynic, due to being old, not to being a cynic. Survival is means only. We cynics know that better than anyone.

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
  12. Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those who are gullible and trusting continue to be exploited and abused by their fellow man. People aren't born cynical. They've had their trust betrayed repeatedly and, quite rationally, conclude that humans cannot be trusted.

    1. Re: Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what's REALLY stupid? Caring why somebody uses a particular word when the word used is clear and unambiguous and everybody else understands what's being said.

      That, and crafting a narrative around why someone chooses a word--one that of course reinforces your smug feeling of superiority for apparently being a 'people person'.

    2. Re: Meanwhile... by xevioso · · Score: 1

      But he is superior for being a people person. Loneliness has been shown to be unhealthy. Being around people is actually physically good for you, and choosing to live a healthy lifestyle does in fact make one superior to those who choose to live a lifestyle where they can die sooner.

    3. Re: Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But he is superior for being a people person.

      That's utterly subjective.

      Loneliness has been shown to be unhealthy.

      That's only if you're feeling lonely. And whether it's good or bad to be "unhealthy" is also subjective. Drop the nonsense; don't pretend that such people are objectively superior.

  13. BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't believe it.

  14. Or ... by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe people who blindly trust everyone never get identified as having dementia, because they just go along with everything you say?

    Now get off my lampshade!

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:Or ... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2

      Maybe people who blindly trust everyone never get identified as having dementia, because they just go along with everything you say?

      Yea, OK, that sounds good...

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    2. Re:Or ... by Nephandus · · Score: 1

      Wish I had points. I thought exactly that. I've know Alzheimer's victims that weren't diagnosed till very late due to people ignoring cynical me, while viewing them with mindless uncriticality. Same thing happens with happy idiots in general, either conformists or pretty/charming/etc. socially-privileged types. They just get away with their idiocy, even actively inflicting it on unspecial others, while the consequences are generally out right denied, and anyone calling them on it is immediately attacked and discredited.

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
    3. Re:Or ... by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      I thought exactly that. I've know Alzheimer's victims that weren't diagnosed till very late due to people ignoring cynical me, while viewing them with mindless uncriticality.

      A couple of years ago, I had a relative who just didn't seem right.

      It had been a few years since I'd seen her, but she was quiet, almost wooden, and neither laughed nor told jokes, and surely didn't exhibit her usual acerbic wit. She was almost docile.

      The first thing I said to several people are "what the heck is wrong with her, she's not the same". Several other relatives all said the same thing.

      Turns out she was having some bad side effects of medications, and people hadn't picked up on it -- for some reason it didn't seem unusual to them. Once they squared away her meds, she went back to normal very quickly.

      Had we all expected a quiet, docile, agreeable idiot, nobody would have ever noticed. The fact that she suddenly was sent of huge alarm bells for me that something had changed.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  15. Average age? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How come "all had an average age of 71" ? What's your average age? Is it different from mine?

    1. Re:Average age? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      My average age is exactly half of my actual age. I'm speaking about the time average, of course.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:Average age? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "All had an average age" is correct, because "average age" is a property of the group "All". It would be incorrect to say "each had an average age" because that would be referring to individuals having a property only applicable to a group.

  16. alcohol and caffeine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did they take into account the relative levels of alcohol and caffeine consumption between the two groups into account?

    Nothing reduces cynicism like sitting back and sipping a good single malt scotch.

    1. Re:alcohol and caffeine? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Fins drink like fish, this is an important factor left out.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:alcohol and caffeine? by Bob_Who · · Score: 1

      Fins drink like fish, this is an important factor left out.

      Fish don't drink, silly. Nobody drinks like them.

      (unless they are cynical or demented)

  17. This is only Part 1 of the study by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Part 1 is that cynicism causes dementia.

    The second part of the study, to be released next month is that they have developed a new variety of loganberry (available for a very reasonable price) which will significantly extend life expectancy, and improve performance in the bedroom.

  18. Wait by xdor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So critical thinking leads to dementia?

    Or do we notice more when people with high mental function lose it than those who never had good thinking skills in the first place?

    1. Re:Wait by emacs_abuser · · Score: 3, Informative

      Critical thinking is not the same thing as being cynical.
      You can be skeptical without being cynical.

    2. Re:Wait by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      So critical thinking leads to dementia?

      Well, see, you use up all of your brain's lifespan by using it too much.

      So by the time you get older, your brain is all worn out.

      By not applying critical thinking, you save up your brain for later in life. ;-)

      (NOTE: this is sarcasm for those of you who can't think critically)

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:Wait by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Funny

      You can be skeptical without being cynical.

      I doubt it. :-P

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    4. Re:Wait by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      You keep using that word but I do not think you know what it means.

      Critical Thinking == "You should try this water it has smaller molecules so it hydrates you faster!". Ummmm No it doesn't smaller molecules and no it will not.

      Cynical == most what people post in the comments of slashdot. It is almost and example of critical thinking or higher mental functioning.

      Stupid == We need solar and wind to reduce our dependance on foreign oil.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    5. Re:Wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We DO need to reduce our dependance on foreign oil, or any oil really.

    6. Re:Wait by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      (NOTE: this is sarcasm for those of you who can't think critically)

      The smiley at the end already said so. But of course this is Slashdot, so stating it twice may be appropriate. ;-)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    7. Re:Wait by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Stupid == We need solar and wind to reduce our dependance on foreign oil.

      No, equalling that statement with "stupid" is stupid.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    8. Re:Wait by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      And thankyou for playing
      1. I never said we shouldn't reduce our use of oil.
      2. Only 3% of all electricity in the US is generated by using oil. Please check for yourself. Just Google US electrical power by source.
      3. Solar and wind are used to make electricity. Which is as shown above not really generated with oil.
      4. You assume that I am anti solar and or wind. I am not but they do not replace oil.
      5. You might try to justify your statement by saying that we could use electric cars... Well yes but again that would reduce our use of oil but where the electricity comes from is the not cause for the reduction in the use of foreign oil. Unless people start building oil fired plants to make the power for cars which would be dumb with all the natural gas we have.
      6. You assume that Solar and Wind advocates will not lie to you... If they say that Solar and Wind will reduce our dependence on foreign oil it is a lie.
      7. You assumed you knew the truth and were not willing to question it.... And I bet you pride yourself on being a skeptic and critical thinker...

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    9. Re:Wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being skeptic, you will realize you can't get drunk only with water, unlike all the rest of trusting flock.

    10. Re:Wait by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      And thank you for playing.
      Less than 1% of the electricity generated in the US is from oil. Solar and Wind only generate electricity.
      So well under 1% of all oil is used to generate electrical power. It was less the 2% of all oil in 2004 and has gone down to under 1% of the oil used in the US.

      http://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/...

      And you just flunked your skeptic and critical thinking test.
      1. You assumed you knew the truth.
      2. You failed to question the truth.
      3. spouted off without doing any research.
      4. You trusted without question those that told you that Solar and Wind would reduce our dependence on foreign oil when it is less than 1% of our oil use.
      5. I am willing to bet that you are proud of your critical thinking skills and consider yourself an enlightened skeptic yet you showed none of those skills.

      BTW Solar and Wind compete more with coal which is a good thing.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    11. Re:Wait by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Less than 1% of the electricity generated in the US is from oil. Solar and Wind only generate electricity.
      So well under 1% of all oil is used to generate electrical power. It was less the 2% of all oil in 2004 and has gone down to under 1% of the oil used in the US.

      What you say may be true. As non-American I'm not terribly interested in the details of the American energy mix. Indeed, before that post, I couldn't even know which county you are from, so even with perfect knowledge of the American energy mix I could not have decided on the truth of that statement.

      But your definition of "stupid" is wrong. "Stupid" is not the same as "uninformed", "misinformed" or "wrong".

      And you just flunked your skeptic and critical thinking test.

      There was no critical thinking test. I didn't make any statement about the energy situation of the US or any other country. I only made a statement about your use of "stupid".

      1. You assumed you knew the truth.

      I didn't assume to know the truth of the statement. I did (and still do) assume I know the truth about the meaning of "stupid". And your use of that word doesn't fit that meaning.

      2. You failed to question the truth.

      OK, I indeed didn't consult a dictionary (but I'm convinced you didn't either). Well, let's do now (I omit the pronounciation and ethymology parts):

      stupid I a: slow of mind: obtuse b: given to unwise decisions or actions 2: dulled in feeling or sensation 3: marked by or resulting from dullness: senseless (a stupid mistake) 4: dreary, boring (a stupid plot) [Source: Webster's New Encyclopedic Dictionary]

      None of those fits your use of stupid.

      3. spouted off without doing any research.

      Yes, I did not do any research on the meaning of "stupid". Nor did you, apparently.

      4. You trusted without question those that told you that Solar and Wind would reduce our dependence on foreign oil when it is less than 1% of our oil use.

      Does not apply. I didn't make a statement about wind and solar energy, I made a statement about your use of "stupid".

      5. I am willing to bet that you are proud of your critical thinking skills and consider yourself an enlightened skeptic yet you showed none of those skills.

      While I do think I have some critical thinking skills, I certainly didn't need to use them on your comment. Basic language knowledge was sufficient. In that sense I agree that I didn't show any critical thinking skills in my reply, because there was no critical thinking skill needed or sufficient.

      You better think about what your answer says about your critical thinking skills.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    12. Re:Wait by Graydyn+Young · · Score: 1

      Specifically, they were measuring cynicism using the Cook-Medley scale, which defines cynical distrust as "A generally negative view of humankind, depicting others as unworthy, deceitful, and selfish"

    13. Re:Wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like this thread. It's the 'use it AND lose it' rationale.

    14. Re:Wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can be skeptical without being cynical.

      I doubt it. :-P

      Dumbasses.

    15. Re:Wait by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      This is Slashdot which is a US based website so the assumption should be US. I also doubt that many other nations are use the argument that solar replaces foreign oil the way the US does. Most other nations seem to use the more logical argument that it reduces greenhouse gases.
      Unless your are in the middle east or a small island nation, odds are very high that only a tiny % of your electricity is from oil.

      " "Stupid" is not the same as "uninformed", "misinformed" or "wrong"."
      Making an incorrect statement over and over or defending such a statement without research is stupid in one of the common use of the word.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    16. Re:Wait by Stuarticus · · Score: 1

      So you are saying that because most oil isn't used to make mains power another source of abundant energy won't affect our use of oil? I think you be the one that isn't thinking critically.

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
  19. I don't trust the authors of this article by freezin+fat+guy · · Score: 4, Funny

    What's their angle?

    1. Re:I don't trust the authors of this article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's their angle?

      Unfortunately, they have completely forgotten.

    2. Re:I don't trust the authors of this article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's their angle?

      Apparently more than 90 degrees.

    3. Re:I don't trust the authors of this article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scare their employers critics?

    4. Re:I don't trust the authors of this article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh don't be obtuse!

  20. the original cook-medley test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.cardia.dopm.uab.edu/study-information/nhlbi-data-repository-data/cardia-documentation/year-05-exam-3

  21. Quick! sombody tell Alex Jones! by FudRucker · · Score: 2

    that guy blathers extremely cynical conspiracy theories 24/7/365 and all those poor fools stupid enough to listen are doomed to dementia

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  22. Well.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm fucked.

  23. The chicken and the egg? by Rambo+Tribble · · Score: 2

    I might posit that cynicism is a coping mechanism for the dementia-impaired.

  24. To prevent fire, burn everything ahead of time by Atrox666 · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you're optimistic in this world you are already delusional so how would they tell if you're suffering from dementia?

    1. Re:To prevent fire, burn everything ahead of time by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 1

      That's a very good comment, though some people seem to live charmed lives, so it's understandable that they would be optimistic.

  25. Eastern Finland have found that .. by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    Eastern Finland have found that people who have high levels of cynical distrust are three times as likely to suffer from dementia

    But can you trust the Finns?

    1. Re: Eastern Finland have found that .. by GungaDan · · Score: 2

      Huck, maybe, but definitely not his pap.

      --
      Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
    2. Re: Eastern Finland have found that .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eastern Finland have found that people who have high levels of cynical distrust are three times as likely to suffer from dementia

      But can you trust the Finns?

      Having a high level of cynical distrust in Finland my be the equivalent of having a low level of cynical distrust in the US or being a disagreeable Canadian. All are indicative of a dementia.

  26. Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know you are a dip-ship when you call people 'humans'. Like that distinction needs to be made, ever. Unless you are comparing humans to non-humans (in sci-fi) like robots.

    Watch less TV, talk to more PEOPLE.

  27. It Never Fails . . . by hduff · · Score: 1

    What is exercised the most becomes the strongest.

    --
    "I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert
    1. Re:It Never Fails . . . by cellocgw · · Score: 2

      What is exercised the most becomes the strongest.

      Sadly, about half the population has learned they have one muscle which never gets stronger (or bigger) no matter how much they exercise it.

      OK, I'll stop with the Jr. High School humor.

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
  28. Things which may be confounded with cynicism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Stress
    2. Alcohol/Drug Use
    3. Depression
    4. Nutrition/Excercise

  29. I don't need to worry about dementia later in life by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

    ... I'm pretty demented now!

  30. Really? by Simulant · · Score: 2

    Tell you what... If you stopping making up misleading headlines I'll try and not be so cynical about them.

  31. Maybe I'm Just Cynical ... by ilparatzo · · Score: 2

    I might just be cynical [har har har], but there is something about a group saying "hey, if you don't just trust what people are telling you, you will one day become crazy". I would rather end up a little crazy in my later life than become too optimistic. A little bit of cynicism keeps you from being taken advantage of too much.

    It's like the government funding a study that finds that if you question what the government says or does, you're more likely to end up with Alzheimers. So you better stop complaining and believe everything we say.

  32. Just keep drinking the Kool-Aid... by mschaffer · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just keep drinking the Kool-Aid. Apparently they put anti-dementia meds in it.

  33. Fuck you you worthless scum by gelfling · · Score: 1

    Keep your hippy happy bullshit to yourself. Seriously, fucking die screaming.

  34. Not trustworthy... by Zalbik · · Score: 1

    Call my cynical, but I don't trust any studies from the University of Eastern...refrigerator!

  35. A conversation is not a syllogism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    A conversation, even online, is not a syllogism.

    Conversation requires context and shared assumptions. Of course those are often not shared, not fully understood, there can be willful disagreement, misunderstandings, and simple sloppiness.

    All of this activates the typical Slashdot amateur logicians and philosophers who set out to 'prove' the other person is ignorant, stupid, evil or all of those. A pointless exercise repeated ad nauseum.

    Of course the statement you posted is 'stupid'. (technically it simply not a logically valid argument.) It is trivially 'stupid' because the word 'need', in a logical sense, allows any alternate possibility. (A stealth version of affirming the consequent.) We could reduce our dependence on foreign oil by killing 90% of the population. Oil dependence - problem solved. Oops! New problems.

    TLDR: It's all in the assumptions. And yours are wrong.

    Further reading: GEB, to see how even syllogisms fall apart or spiral out of control without SOME shared context and assumptions.

    1. Re:A conversation is not a syllogism. by Bob_Who · · Score: 1

      A conversation, even online, is not a syllogism.

      Yes, but if you're really fly, you can cause multiple, simultaneous syllogisms....

  36. 90% of everything is crap. This law is recursive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    90% of everything is crap. This law is recursive.

  37. Whelp... by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

    I'm screwed.

  38. Avoiding dementia drives me to dementia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, let me get this straight.

    1. I don't want dementia
    2. So, according to some article somewhere (SAS), I should engage in reading, writing, and other various activities to keep my mind active (See the "Keeping the mind active to protect from Alzheimer's and dementia" on http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/263769.php, for example)
    3. So, I read. I mix my reading up with fiction, quasi-fiction, and scientifically based nonfiction. It doesn't matter very much what it is I read, it pretty much all suggests that everybody is just doing what's best for themselves. Try it yourself. Try to think about what motivates any person you've ever met. I always find they have some personal reason driving them, whether it's immediately apparent to everyone or hard for they themselves to even determine.
    4. Therefore, thanks to my quest to prevent dementia, I've become cynical.
    5. Then, I happen upon this article (in my quest to keep my mind reading so I don't get dementia): http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/study-stop-being-so-cynical-you-could-give-yourself-dementia-1450422. Let me see which social networking sites I should share this article with so all my friends can come visit this site. Oh, look, the article has no less than 9 ads embedded on the single page - some of which seem to be very related to recent Google searches I've performed. Hmm, is someone trying to make a buck off me by summing up one single scientific study which was just published yesterday? Wait, that is just me being cynical.
    6. Then, I figure it all out. Cynicism does, in fact, lead to dementia. Dementia is my mind's way of telling me, "That's it. I give up. Everything really is shit. You do what you want, but I'm shutting down. Good luck trying to figure anything out in this batshit crazy world, jackass."
    7. Then I forget everything and slowly die the same miserable death I was trying to avoid in the first place. Go figure. No wonder I'm so cynical...

    I'll just book my reservation at the nursing home now. Why wait until I'm 71?

  39. I am a cynical idealist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do you think about that?

    1. Re:I am a cynical idealist by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 1

      Cynicism isn't the opposite of Idealism, it's the opposite of Romanticism. The opposite of Idealism is Realism.

    2. Re:I am a cynical idealist by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Cynicism is idealism that's had time to curdle.

  40. The War Nerd's take by drdrgivemethenews · · Score: 1

    People are always telling me I'm "cynical", whatever that means. I mean, either you're right or you're wrong; and if you're right, how is that "cynical"?
                    -- Gary Brecher, the War Nerd

  41. Cynical? Moi? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Stop Being So Cynical, You Could Give Yourself Dementia

    Yeah, right.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  42. Kool-Aid cures Dementia by 7bit · · Score: 2

    So in other words.. You'd better drink societies Kool-Aid and smile all the time or else they'll start calling you crazy.

    * Cynical interpretation of TFA.

  43. I have faith in everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have faith in everyone.

    I have faith in people to be shit, to be naive, to be malicious and corrupt.
    I have faith in people to be nice only when it suits them.
    But I also have faith in people to be nice in general.

    So, if I expect people to be shit, would that be the same?
    How would this change the results?

  44. And another thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How exactly are they going to reduce my risks for dementia by changing my behavior and outlook on life? Are they going to convince me to:

    * Forget all the stuff I've ever learned that had such a clear influence to lead me to becoming the cynical person I am now?
    * Alter the way I communicate and the language I use so I don't get caught in the traps of cynicism anymore?
    * Convince me to stop focusing on and paying attention to all the stuff that I usually do which tends to keep me cynical?
    * Work with me to change my ability to reason and the judgments I make so I am no longer cynical?
    * Convince me to view the world in a less cynical light?

    That way, they could try to trick me into behaving like I have dementia so that I don't develop actual dementia (http://www.alz.org/what-is-dementia.asp). I guess nobody else will know the difference, but technically I'll be ok. Ok, Fine. How much is that treatment going to cost me?

  45. Yeah.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I trust them about as much as I trust the Price of Nigeria.

  46. Where Ignorance is Bliss, 'Tis Folly to be Wise by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 1

    I'm reminded of similar studies showing that by various members, people suffering from depression tend to have more accurate assessments of themselves and others, are better at predicting the results of a particular plan, etc.

    Being aware of what is actually going on is just a recipe for personal misery. Delusional mooncalves may be less successful, but they're a lot happier.

  47. More junk science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They failed to control for MANY important things and ended-up with a probably false correlation/causation conclusion.

    For example: It is known that devout religious Christians and Jews tend to be less cynical and tend to live longer (No assertion by me over whether THESE things are linked and, if so, which leads to which) but this needs to be controlled for by people involved in things like the study currently being discussed. It could just be that they have discovered the same correlation hiding under a different methodology AND failed to advance anything by failing to further pursue the study of whether this is pure coincidence or a valid linkage, and which is the cause and which is the effect.

  48. more bullshit by Khyber · · Score: 1

    "Scientists from the University of Eastern Finland have found that people who have high levels of cynical distrust are three times as likely to suffer from dementia in later life, than those who have more faith in other people."

    In other words, they're trying to pin the blame on someone other than dealing with the same issues they have in the first place like any other country on it's way to first-world status.

    Yea, good fucking luck, assholes.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  49. more correlation without causation by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    I don't buy into this optimism/cynicism dichotomy. I buy into a truth/honesty vs bullshit/lies dichotomy. Reality is how it is, and while it is malleable in some ways, it is not in others. Many times people equate the latter as bad news or 'cynicism' rather than a reality check, and don't listen.

  50. Or just maybe... by gmarsh · · Score: 1

    ... dementia is the highest level you can achieve of not giving a shit about anything anymore.

  51. really? by meeotch · · Score: 1

    I call bullshit!

  52. Contact with the world breaks your mind by russotto · · Score: 1

    From the Devil's Dictionary: Cynic, n. A blackguard whose faulty vision sees things as they are not as they ought to be.

    Too much poorly-buffered contact with harsh reality probably wears your mind down.

  53. Can you tell? by SallyBowls · · Score: 1

    Perhaps it is that for the sort of person who actually trusts their fellow human, it is hard to tell when dementia strikes.

  54. It's clearly better to be optimistic by UpnAtom · · Score: 1

    Whether for happiness reasons or Seligman's optimism ratio, optimism is clearly better for almost everyone. It doesn't matter if you're an idiot who doesn't know any better... or someone who creatively finds an optimistic way to perceive the tragic mess that is life. ;)

  55. I try to be cynical but... by An+dochasac · · Score: 1

    I try to become more cynical every day, but lately I just can't keep up. -- Lily Tomlin (She's only 74 but sharp as ever. YMMV)

    Well, here's one possible effect and cause scenario that occurred to me.

    Start with a healthy person who has a generally positive view of humanity.

    Above the threshold reached at the age of reason (mental age ~7) when we begin to see the flaws in ourselves and others, I think it takes more mental energy to have a generally positive view of humanity than to fall back on cynicism. I agree with others that we may be seeing an indicator of pre-dementia rather than a cause of dementia.

    I've lived over fifty years in this country and cynicism is at an all-time high. But strangely enough, so is credulity.

    You've lived for fifty years in Finland?

    We've become a nation of cynical suckers.

    Oh, you're American. I'm sorry. Does anyone know why Slashdot's lameness filter can't handle my SARCASM tags?

  56. I'm fucked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm fucked!

  57. Stop worrying so much that you may get dementia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the stress will kill you.

  58. Dementia is a default disease of old age by inflamed · · Score: 1

    People tend to get demetia as a result of brain age in cases where their bodies don't check out first. My hypothesis is that cynicism correlates with good physical health and a long life terminated only by the action of entrophy on the CNS.

  59. Perfectly understandable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would probably cynically mistrusting if I felt I was losing my memory. If you can't trust your own judgment anymore, who are you going to trust? I'd probably try to keep a lot of polaroids with notes around. And tattoos.