Slashdot Mirror


Solar Impulse 2 Makes First Flight

schwit1 writes: "The solar-powered experimental airplane Solar Impulse 2 made its maiden flight on Monday. 'The solar-powered aircraft took off at 5:36 AM CET, when the weather around the aerodrome was at its calmest, with pilot Markus Scherdel at the controls. The aircraft flew for two hours and 17 minutes, reaching an altitude of 1,670 m (5,500 ft) and a ground speed of 55.6 km/h (30 kt). According to Solar Impulse, the in-flight data indicates that the aircraft slated to make the first all-solar global circumnavigation flight performed to expectations.' The goal is to use this plane to fly around the world in 2015. Videos of the takeoff and landing are available, as are a series of pictures. The plane gets off the ground very quickly, does not move very fast, and is balanced precariously on a single set of wheels in the center. If you look closely before takeoff, there are two guys literally holding the wings up at each end to balance it. They have to run with the plane for the first few seconds until it gets enough lift to balance on its own. The landing video shows both bicyclists and men racing to meet up with the wings to hold them up once the plane stops."

23 of 34 comments (clear)

  1. Why does it need to land anyway by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    If it can fly forever?

    1. Re:Why does it need to land anyway by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Why does it need a pilot?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    2. Re:Why does it need to land anyway by dpidcoe · · Score: 2

      Because no one cares if a computer flies around the world. They need to see a human put their life in danger for it to be interesting.

    3. Re:Why does it need to land anyway by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Why does it need a pilot?

      ...and that's the most likely use case -- solar powered (albeit slow moving) drones that can stay up for long periods of time, providing the weather isn't too rambunctious.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    4. Re:Why does it need to land anyway by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

      providing the weather isn't too rambunctious.

      They can solve that problem by just flying higher.

  2. Bravo! by Hussman32 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There will be a million negative posts (maybe not here) about practicality, weight, viability in weather etc., but they have a plane that flies using solar power, which is a much better performance than all of the naysayers expected from them before yesterday.

    Good for them, I'm impressed.

    --
    "Who are you?" "No one of consequence." "I must know." "Get used to disappointment."
    1. Re:Bravo! by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Not saying it's worse but I wonder how much extra energy is used to make one of these vs a regular plane.

    2. Re:Bravo! by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      moderate tailwind and you stop flying?!?

      No. Moderate tailwind and you cover ground moderately faster. You can look these things up.

    3. Re:Bravo! by wagnerrp · · Score: 1

      A gusty tailwind in an aircraft that will only manage 30 knots can very easily cause you to stall and crash.

    4. Re:Bravo! by germansausage · · Score: 1

      Windmills do not work that way. Good night.

    5. Re:Bravo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Gusty wind only exists in ground level. Earth caused turbulences in wind stop almost completely between 100 and 200 m from ground.

      BR,
      Anonymous glider pilot

    6. Re:Bravo! by wagnerrp · · Score: 1

      Yes, and airliners never suffer turbulence.

    7. Re:Bravo! by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      Gust responses are very benign in an airplane with such a low wing loading. It would take an extremely sharp-edged gust to achieve an actual airspeed reduction that big...basically it reacts like a leaf instead of like an airliner.

  3. Re:Trollers gonna troll by deadweight · · Score: 1

    30 knots is about 34 MPH.

  4. It is the next Wright Flyer by RussellTheMuscle · · Score: 1

    It flies better than the original, and it seems to be affected by wind as much as the original. And...the original gave us the SR 71 60 years later. I hope this means a first step toward eliminating con trails and other blights in otherwise beautiful blue skies.

    1. Re:It is the next Wright Flyer by wagnerrp · · Score: 1, Insightful

      One would expect any commenter on slashdot to have at least the most basic grasp of physics necessary to realize that a solar powered aircraft will never have any utility beyond low speed loiter, and will never replace all those terrible contrail-producing jets. One might think too highly of the common slashdotter...

    2. Re:It is the next Wright Flyer by wagnerrp · · Score: 1

      Yes. Yes it does...

  5. Goddamn helicopter making all that racket by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    I wanted to hear what the thing sounded like.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:Goddamn helicopter making all that racket by Cochonou · · Score: 1

      I have seen the first prototype flying at Le Bourget in 2011. It makes almost no sound.

  6. Drone crew by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    If you look closely before takeoff, there are two guys literally holding the wings up at each end to balance it. They have to run with the plane for the first few seconds until it gets enough lift to balance on its own. The landing video shows both bicyclists and men racing to meet up with the wings to hold them up once the plane stops.

    This delicate and accurate work cries out for a couple of drones, not dudes, huffing and akimbo.

  7. They better leave early.... by BranMan · · Score: 1

    I hope they take off in Jan. - at 30 kts the trip may take the whole year!

  8. HDR pics by quahog · · Score: 1

    What's with the overdone HDR pictures? Looks like MS Flight Sim.

  9. Speed by severn2j · · Score: 1
    If they want to fly around the world with it, wont they need to keep up with the sun, as that's it power source? If so, it'll need to go a lot faster than 30kt..

    (Disclaimer - In /. fashion, I only read the summary, so if the article explains it, then I apologise.)