Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: PC-Based Oscilloscopes On a Microbudget?

New submitter fffdddooo (3692429) writes I know it's something that people used to ask every few years, but answers get old so quickly. I'm an electronics teacher, and I'm wondering if it's possible to find some oscilloscope (and why not spectrum analyser?) for recommending to my students, to be able to work at home. I'm thinking of something near $50-$70. Two or three years ago, I'm sure the answer was No, but nowadays? The same reader points out two options spotted on Amazon: one that's "very cheap but Khz" (it's also a kit that requires assembly), and another that aims to be capable of 20MHz, 2-channel operation. What's out there, he'd like to know, that's not junk?

172 comments

  1. XOScope by GerardAtJob · · Score: 2

    http://xoscope.sourceforge.net...
    Needs a or many sound card.

    Have fun!

    --
    I can't call that English ;-)
    1. Re:XOScope by GerardAtJob · · Score: 2

      You'll need "http://xoscope.sourceforge.net/hardware/hardware.html" and please note : The sound card will be filtered to somewhere around 20Hz-20kHz. Read a lot and have fun. This will probably not be enough for all your needs, but it's a good start.

      --
      I can't call that English ;-)
    2. Re:XOScope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sound card based so it can only go up to 44Khz, which is useless.

    3. Re: XOScope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      May be useful to you: get one supported by the excellent sigrok open source library!

    4. Re:XOScope by maliqua · · Score: 1

      perhaps to you even 20khz can be helpful to someone with out another option

    5. Re:XOScope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are doing this as a classroom exercise think about also installing a Fast Fourier Transform visualization tool like http://fft-spectra.sourceforge.net/ . As in a PC based oscilloscope, your signal processing is mostly dependent on the Audio Card bandwidth. If you want more bandwidth than you can get with a cheep or used audio card, the better bet is to try to get an already built commercial solution.

    6. Re:XOScope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you specify why it is useless?

      In my experience (EE) a lot of debugging can be done by just having a LED in the right place. Sometimes a multimeter is sufficient.
      44kHz sounds like plenty for doing measurements on a power supply. I won't catch everything, but the 20MHz scope he is looking for won't find everything either.

    7. Re:XOScope by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 3, Informative

      Didn't you mean "up to 22 kHz"? I mean, with Nyquist and all...

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    8. Re:XOScope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some soundcards have unusually high sampling rates, to get those "overtones". so they might do better than 44kHz.

      Anyway, 44kHz may be fine for some uses. Education? Just show some waveforms? Work with - sound ?

    9. Re:XOScope by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 2

      A sound card oscilloscope will have a very limited measurement range; exactly how limited depends on the sample rate of your sound card. At best you'll get a bandwidth of 90KHz or thereabouts if you have a card that does 192KHz sampling and if the analog bandwidth of the interface actually goes that high. But it's free if the signals you want to measure are suitable for direct connection to a sound card, or cheap if you also need to build the interface, and good enough for some purposes.

      Reasonably inexpensive PC oscilloscope interfaces with 20MHz bandwidth are available now. Here are links to two: they're a slight stretch from the OP's price point ($80 and $73). If you're willing to spend more you can get more bandwidth; see the comparison table on the page for the SainSmart scope.
      http://www.amazon.com/Hantek-6022BE-PC-based-Oscilloscope-Bandwidth/dp/B00EY10OSE/
      http://www.amazon.com/SainSmart-Portable-Handheld-Oscilloscope-Bandwidth/dp/B00FYGEFYM/

    10. Re:XOScope by tepples · · Score: 1

      Depends on how the transition band is set up for a 96 kHz ADC. You might get 20-44000 Hz of decent response, then sharp rolloff from there to the Nyquist frequency at 48000 Hz.

  2. DIY Oscilloscopes by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1
    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    1. Re:DIY Oscilloscopes by CanHasDIY · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This one looks promising:

      http://www.instructables.com/i...

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  3. Salae logic by nurd68 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We've been using the Saleae Logic 16 - https://www.saleae.com/logic16 at work.It goes from 2 channels at 100MHz up to 16 channels at 12.5MHz. We use them for debugging all the low speed stuff (serial ports, I2C, SD, etc.) - basically everything but the CPU memory interface.

    Their upcoming "pro" version adds analog sampling, but it is not yet out.

    1. Re:Salae logic by Smerta · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, but "oscilloscope" != "logic analyzer". And the Logic 16 (I have one) is 5x the OP's stated price range.

      I kinda feel like the OP asked where he could find a cheap, sporty little car, and you're telling him he should consider buying a fire truck.

    2. Re:Salae logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not an o'scope. Nice try though. Also, $300 != "microbudget".

    3. Re:Salae logic by mean+pun · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Since the OP asked in parentheses for spectrum analyser suggestions, he seems to be interested in cheap measurement instruments in general. I don't think a logic analyser is too far off topic.

    4. Re:Salae logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Click on the 'products' link. https://www.saleae.com/cart

      They have 4 new products coming from $99 to $499.

      The Logic 8 has 8 digital/analog inputs.

    5. Re:Salae logic by nurd68 · · Score: 2

      Sorry, I wasn't clear - the logic 4 DOES add the analog functionality and thus qualifies as an o-scope. It is out of his price range, but he might inquire as to bulk or student discounts. They might knock some $$ off that $100...

    6. Re:Salae logic by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      Oscilloscopes and spectrum analyzers are for examining analog signals. Logic analyzers are only useful for digital signals. They're in two different domains. You can't use a logic analyzer to debug a power supply design.

    7. Re:Salae logic by DrMcCoy · · Score: 1

      You can get Chinese knock-offs of the Saleae Logic or the USBee for $10, at DealeXtreme for example. They run fine with sigrok, and even with the original Saleae software if they report the correct USB Product/Vendor ID pair. They might not do the higher sampling rates, though.

      If they don't report the correct USB IDs, you can reprogram the USB EEPROM with the Cypress EZ-USB FX2LP tool. The Linux version is a bit buggy though (converts hex data to 0-terminated char* before sending to the device and therefore can't write data with 0x00 in it), so I wrote my own little tool: https://github.com/DrMcCoy/FX2LPTool

      Of course, that's "only" a logical analyzer, no oscilloscope.

    8. Re:Salae logic by ttucker · · Score: 1

      Not an o'scope. Nice try though. Also, $300 != "microbudget".

      For an oscilloscope, $300 is more like a nanobudget, or even picobudget.

    9. Re:Salae logic by sg_oneill · · Score: 2

      For an oscilloscope, $300 is more like a nanobudget, or even picobudget.

      True, though you can often pick up a good old solid Analogue CRO on Ebay for that price and honestly those old girls will still do the job marvelously for 99% of use cases.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    10. Re:Salae logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Soundcards make terrible scope inputs, the AA filters make the bandwidth above about 12-18kHz useless, the highpass filters make anything below 50Hz useless. You can sometimes bypass the highpass filters when they are external, but the AA is built in. The AA also makes Super-Nyquist sampling impossible. Oh and you would need to add instrumentation amplifiers for differential measurement, voltage dividers for multi ranging and protection circuits.

      Now, if you took some cheap USB audio interface, and attached a compatible SAH ADC, then you don't get the AA, apodisation and spectral biasing problems of an ADC designed for audio, and you can do super-nyquist sampling to push your spectrum analysis way above audio frequencies (with external filters).

    11. Re:Salae logic by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      Since the OP asked in parentheses for spectrum analyser suggestions, he seems to be interested in cheap measurement instruments in general.

      The best option for students needing cheap and versatile measuring equipment. would be the Red Pitaya. http://redpitaya.com/?skip_int...

      It's not as cheap as OP wants, but it's a far better learning tool than a half-assed knock off.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    12. Re: Salae logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really. Go have a look on Ali express and choose from a range of 1 gsample scores for around that price many of which can be hacked for free to 100+ MHz bandwidth.
      Also logic analyser knockoffs for nearly free..

      All good enough for casual and semi professional use.

      Of course 300 is quite a bit above the original questions budget.. Bit they are damn good tools for the prices.

    13. Re:Salae logic by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Since the OP asked in parentheses for spectrum analyser suggestions, he seems to be interested in cheap measurement instruments in general.

      Maybe, but given he seems to expect something to digitise the signals followed by a PC ased intreface, a spectrum analyser is trivial. All you need to do is include a good FFT library (fftw) in the scope program and the spectrum analyser comes almost for free.

      I'd say that digital signals are further from analog ones than an FFT is in principle.

      That said having I2C and SPI analysis on a scope never does any harm.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    14. Re:Salae logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some sound cards have chips that do work down to DC, may need a hardware mod to let the signals be captured though.

    15. Re:Salae logic by Alioth · · Score: 1

      I picked up a used Tektronix 100MHz 1Gsample/sec digital storage scope for around $300. It's an older one with a CRT but it's a *GOOD* scope and has a good analogue front end. I recently upgraded to an LCD version of the same scope (since I wanted enough portability such that it would fit in an airline carry-on) for about the equivalent of $600 (again Tektronix 100MHz 1GSample/sec). The newer LCD based one also has much better firmware. But not withstanding, the old CRT one is still a good instrument and not horrifically expensive. There are always dozens of them on ebay.

    16. Re:Salae logic by vettemph · · Score: 1

      >> Their upcoming "pro" version adds analog sampling, but it is not yet out.

      The pre-order option was due to ship within 90 days
      Now the website claims to ship pre-orders in July.
      I've bought the standard logic 8 a month ago and can't wait for the Pro 8. I've been watching these folks almost every day. The device and interface is just to good to be true. (tested on linux and that evil/stupid windows)
        I've fix several embedded device issues in one night, the first night that this device arrived.

        I Highly recommend that anyone who is thinking about it, download the software and try it out. It will give you simulated data if you do not have an actual device connected. The simulated data can include SPI, I2C, UART, etc...

      --
      The government which is strong enough to protect you from everything is strong enough to take everything from you.
    17. Re:Salae logic by ttucker · · Score: 1

      I used an analog Tektronix scope in my younger years. It worked, and was cheep. At the same time, it made new scopes seem like small miracles. Just a thought.

  4. Pocket scopes! by EMG+at+MU · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:Pocket scopes! by Ceriel+Nosforit · · Score: 1

      That it still not below $70 USD.

      This is;

      http://www.eevblog.com/forum/t...

      --
      All rites reversed 2010
    2. Re:Pocket scopes! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Those things are not really very good for learners I think. The screen is very small and there are some fairly big limits on their inputs that can easily result in damaged hardware.

      I'd suggest that the OP looks at buying some second hand CROs (cathode ray oscilloscopes) on eBay. They are incredibly cheap in the US, well under $50 much of the time. You can get really nice, well built equipment from manufacturers like Hitachi, Tek, Kikusui, Hameg, Iwatsu, HP and Philips. Even basic ones will be 20MHz or more and have good input protection.

      The only down side is that unless you manage to buy a lot of identical models you will need to give different instructions for each one, but that could be turned into an advantage. They all work basically the same way, so once you have explained the common controls the kids should be able to figure the rest out on their own or with minimal help. Back at college we had a load of different scopes and never had any problems with basic operation. The big physical controls are much easier than digging through on-screen menus too.

      Here's a good video on how to buy used scopes on eBay: http://youtu.be/lZfbo-2sd1A

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:Pocket scopes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They just lowered the price on Amazon to $69.99

  5. Try Googling Arduino Oscilloscope by jslarve · · Score: 1

    Here's one. http://www.instructables.com/i... There is more stuff in the comments, such as https://github.com/hitchcme/Gi... Don't know if they would fit your requirements, but something to look at.

  6. Digital logic analyzers, too! by Megane · · Score: 2

    As long as we're talking about cheap PC-based oscilloscopes, let's talk about the other important kind of cheap PC-based test equipment, the digital logic analyzer, such as this one.

    Not everybody needs one of those old HP/Agilent behemoths (you know, the ones that ran Windows 2000), and in my experience they can be a pain in the ass to use, too. (Not to mention how damn heavy and huge their are.)

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    1. Re:Digital logic analyzers, too! by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      It's maybe not that cheap, but I use an Intronix LogicPort 34-channel logic analyzer for professional development. And I do so even though I have a Tek MSO5204 that I could use instead; the Intronix software is really good! It looks like they are $389 now.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    2. Re:Digital logic analyzers, too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not everybody needs one of those old HP/Agilent behemoths (you know, the ones that ran Windows 2000), and in my experience they can be a pain in the ass to use, too. (Not to mention how damn heavy and huge their are.)

      They don't?? You can pry my 50+ lb HP 16500C out of my cold dead fingers, that is if the shelf its on doesn't collapse first!

    3. Re:Digital logic analyzers, too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Open hardware, open software, 60MHz, $30, what more can you ask?

      http://dangerousprototypes.com/docs/Logic_Pirate

    4. Re:Digital logic analyzers, too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with most of the cheap and even not so cheap logic analyzers is the lack of memory.

    5. Re:Digital logic analyzers, too! by mirix · · Score: 1

      Not everybody needs one of those old HP/Agilent behemoths (you know, the ones that ran Windows 2000)

      My HP 1631 (circa 1985) most certainly doesn't run Windows 2000, you insensitive clod.

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
  7. xminilab-portable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I own one of these. It will run you about $120 dollars not exactly making your price point but there are some cheaper options this guy makes. Check out: http://www.gabotronics.com/oscilloscopes

  8. Craigslist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    My local Craigslist has 9 oscilloscopes listed between $50 and $150.

    1. Re:Craigslist by viperidaenz · · Score: 2, Funny

      How many of those will turn out to have a penis?

    2. Re:Craigslist by danomatika · · Score: 2, Funny
    3. Re:Craigslist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NOT. FUNNY.

  9. scope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Try the analog discovery from diligent(????)

    Its 99$ for students, 2 channel 14 bit, 100 mhz sample speed, front end is less than this, 100 mhz 2 channel waveform generator and 16 channel digital stuff.

    The buffers are 8k or less, but it seems to work okay...

    1. Re:scope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its 99$ for students, 2 channel 14 bit, 100 mhz sample speed, front end is less than this, 100 mhz 2 channel waveform generator and 16 channel digital stuff.

      Analog discovery seems to have 5Mhz bandwidth, not 100MHz. I'm not sure why it has 100Msample/s, seems somewhat excessive for 2 channels at 5MHz.

      For reference, my Rigol DS4024 has 4Gsamples/s and 200Mhz analog bandwidth with 4 channels. The samples/s figure is usually a shared resource, so the more channels you use, the less maximum samples/s you get per channel. (Might be different with more expensive models)

      AnalogDiscovery.pdf

      * 500uV to 5V/division; 1M, 24pF inputs with 5MHz analog bandwidth

    2. Re:scope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try the analog discovery from diligent(????)

      "Digilent"

      http://www.digilentinc.com

    3. Re:scope by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      The 5MHz analog bandwidth does seem artificially limited for a device with 100MHz sampling. Perhaps somebody has figured out how to hack it. But it's also a logic analyzer and a digital signal generator. And it uses 14 bit DACs so it offers a lot more measurement resolution than the cheap 8 bit scope interfaces do.

      Sadly, the $100 price only applies if you are a student in the US who is taking a class where it is a required purchase. It's $160 for other students and $240 for the general public. It looks worthwhile if you get it for $100, more questionable otherwise.

  10. BitScope? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are willing to bump your price range to around $150 (or $250 for the more advnaced) you could use http://www.bitscope.com/BitScope.

    Check out their store http://my.bitscope.com/store/

  11. Two options by SanjuroE · · Score: 3, Informative

    Both are a bit above your price range. But the PicoScope 2200 is a nice entry level scope. Alternatively some assembly required with OpenADC.

  12. budget scope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    bitscope --- get one!

  13. xminilab by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That a pretty tough price range but the xminilab kit from atmel is a neat little setup.
    but the analog bandwidth is only 200k if your willing to spend as much as 150 you can get the xminilab-b with Up to 2mhz plus signal generator and spectrum analyzer

  14. Re:It's all junk by retchdog · · Score: 3, Interesting

    what the fuck does the lack of a quality $50 oscilloscope have to do with "truth"?

    you're right in a round-about way; "China and Walmart" got everyone used to paying almost nothing for a bunch of shiny shit, so when you actually have to pay $$ for something useful or quality it feels like an outrage for no directly-relevant reason.

    --
    "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
  15. Digilent by mckennad · · Score: 2

    Take a look at http://www.digilentinc.com/Pro... $99 Student pricing

  16. For Android sensors: by mean+pun · · Score: 1

    Not exactly what was asked for, since it only plots the output of Android device sensors, but the price is peanuts: SensorScope: https://play.google.com/store/...

  17. What's your curriculum going to be like? by Zeorge · · Score: 1

    I ask as if you can get away with a sound card based O-Scope that's a cheap way, and, you can also find software for spectrum analyzer use as well. Quite possibly, repurpose old PC hardware laying around the school, any laptop will do and would do nicely.

    This could be combined with a auto shop for car audio stuff so now you have a blending of science with a hobby/fascination that is very common to high school students.

  18. I've not seen anything good for under about $300 by mark-t · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is something I was actually in the market for at one point and had researched as thoroughly as I could a few years back. The bad news as I discovered it was that anything that's cheap is junk, and anything that's not junk is not cheap. Although this was, as I said, a few years ago now, and it's possible that other alternatives have arisen since then.

    One of the best things I found at the time which was modestly inexpensive was some hardware that plugged into an iPad or iPhone. The one that I found was a device called iMSO, and it has a bandwidth in the neighborhood of a few Mhz, which isn't too shabby for an analog oscilloscope that cost under $300.

  19. OWON makes a line (VDS) that looks decent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They have ethernet and USB - amazon.com
    Also, ask these questions on eevblog forums. Slashdot is not great at hardware.
    small review/discussion

    ie., over half of the nitwits posting so far are recommending logic analyzers. Please stop. There are also cheap JTAG programming solutions, power supplies, etc. Don't start recommending wrenches when someone asks you for a screwdriver.

    1. Re:OWON makes a line (VDS) that looks decent by vettemph · · Score: 1

      ie., over half of the nitwits posting so far are recommending logic analyzers.

        If you are referring to the Saleae Logic suggestions, the versions due out in July will have up to 50Ms/s 12bit +/-10volt analog
      (plus logic @ 500Ms/s and various bus decode included)

      --
      The government which is strong enough to protect you from everything is strong enough to take everything from you.
  20. What about multifunction devices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    National Instruments recently released their myRIO devices for education. http://sine.ni.com/nips/cds/view/p/lang/en/nid/211694 . They include 10 analog inputs (up to 500 ks/s aggregate), 6 analog outputs, and 40 digital IO. The myRIO's can also be used for FPGA programming, LabVIEW programming, etc... Also see http://www.ni.com/white-paper/14621/en/ .

    1. Re:What about multifunction devices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad anything NI is often terrible, but everyone uses it because it's "simple".

    2. Re:What about multifunction devices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their hardware is nice, if a bit pricey, just avoid LabView and some of their software bits. They've offered drivers that let you program in C, python, and other languages for some time now, so you can use the hardware and then whatever software environment you want.

    3. Re:What about multifunction devices? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      My experience is that it's decent enough hardware, but you pay through the nose for it. On the other hand, their software is the worst bloatware I've ever seen, which basically installs a whole interdependent ecosystem of NI drivers and services on top of Windows, with many of the drivers, libraries, and services doing little more than duplicating the functionality that's already there.

      On the other hand, it is pretty simple to get started. It's likely you could connect that device up to a computer, fire up LabView, drop in a few VI's and drag some wires, and have it plotting data and turning LEDs on and off in a few minutes, which in an education environment may be the way to go. In many ways, it's a lot like doing things in Excel - you can whip up something to solve a problem quickly and easy, but it may not be a good solution for building a complex application.

  21. Re:I've not seen anything good for under about $30 by mark-t · · Score: 2

    *Edit - typo.... (damn, I noticed it as soon as I hit "submit") The iMSO cost *around* $300, not less...

  22. Analog Discovery by Digilent Inc. by agupta_25 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have been using the Analog Discovery for an embedded systems class I recently completed. The regular price is $239 but the student edition is only $99. It’s small enough to fit in your pocket, but powerful enough to replace a stack of lab equipment. It is driven by the free WaveForms software and lets you build and test analog and digital circuits in virtually any environment, in or out of the lab. Here is the link:

    http://www.digilentinc.com/Pro...

    2-Channel Oscilloscope
    2-Channel Waveform Generator
    16-Channel Logic Analyzer
    16-Channel Digital Pattern Generator
    ±5VDC Power Supplies
    Spectrum Analyzer
    Network Analyzer
    Voltmeter
    Digital I/O
    Now supported by MATLAB / MATLAB student edition.

    1. Re:Analog Discovery by Digilent Inc. by jwmjensen · · Score: 1

      I agree. I bought one during the EdX UT.6.01x Embedded Systems class, and have used it for other projects, and my daughter used it to debug projects for her Digital Electronics class (high school level)

  23. Salae logic by Technician · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When recommending test equipment, I tell them the same thing that I tell those needing a PC and ask for recommendations. I ask what are your requirements, and what are your wishlist.

    Start with the essentials. Do you need Microsoft Office, why? Do you need to keep in a budget? If so how much and why? Can you spend extra for extras? If you can get the extra from an alternate for less, would it meet your requirements?

    The PC scope. Define your requirements. Budget is item one listed. This severly limits your options. Is above audio REQUIRED? If not some simple audio interfaces can be used. On Linux there is an oscope program that works great with a sound card. Back to requirements, are you taking absolute voltage measurements? Do you require DC coupling? If so this is not an option that meets your requirements.

    If working in audio frequencies, there are some excellent free spectrum analizers for free in Linux and not sure what is the options in Windows or Mac. For Linear Frequency and Log amplitude the JAAA program in most linux repositories whorks great. For Log frequency and Log amplitude, the companion JAPA program works great. I use it to ring monitors for band/PA. Audacity does a great job creating waveforms. I use it to create frequency sweeps for sound setup with the JAPA program. The sweep generation is a little obscure. Under Generate tab, it is the Chirp function. Set start frequency, end frequency, start amplitude and end amplitude, liner or log sweep, and duration of the "Chirp" to generate your signal.

    For those with a good soundcard or external audio interface the generated sound is direct digital so any noise is not in the recording, but in the analog stream after the digital. Be sure to set the project frequency high, such as 96KHZ, in Audacity to prevent ailising in the upper frequencies. This is a better signal source than any CD recorded sweep due to the higher sample frequency than 44.1K of CD.

    To recap, due to budget, shop for what is free or low cost. Your interface to the outside world will be your expense. There are low cost or no cost software that can enable better capture hardware. The above while nice did not meet the stated budget requirement. Retails for $299. So is the wishlist able to justify the higher cost?

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  24. What are you aiming for? by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    Be aware that you plan to use a sound card in a way it was never intended to be used. So if you hope for anything beyond 10 MHz, you are probably out of luck. And at that range, you already get "real" oscilloscopes for about 100 bucks.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  25. Some assembly required: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  26. Hantek 6022BE by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

    I have a Hantek 6022BE and I'm please with it, but my needs were modest, just show a few waveforms to the kids at school

    --
    Nullius in verba
  27. Perhaps Bitscope can help with some Pi by davonshire · · Score: 2

    http://www.raspberrypi.org/bitscope-micro/

    This seemed like something that while passed your price has oodles of potential for all kinds of teaching uses.

  28. Ebay by Z00L00K · · Score: 2

    Look at Ebay, in some cases you may be lucky to find what you are looking for there. Don't hesitate to look at items from Agilent or Rhode&Schwartz.

    Otherwise go for the reasonably priced items at sites like Conrad.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  29. Wrong tool for the job, IMO by janoc · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you are an electronics teacher, you should know better. The PC-based scopes and the various "DSO Nano" clones are universally crap and none fits into your budget anyway.

    Your students would be vastly better served by buying a used analog scope, those could be obtained on eBay and similar places for a song these days. A used Tektronix or Hameg scope will beat the pants off of any PC-based toy and, more importantly, the student will actually learn and understand how the instrument works and what is being measured, because there are no "magic buttons" to push.

    If the student has a bit larger budget, then the Rigol DS1052E or the newer DS1074Z is a really hard to beat value. There are also Siglents or Attens for the budget conscious, but both brands tend to suffer from poor manufacturing quality and the price is not really much lower than the Rigols.

    Forget spectrum analyzer - there is no decent one for less than $1000 on the market. Digital scopes can do FFT, that helps in a pinch, otherwise the student can always record the data from something like the Rigols above and do a proper spectrum analysis on the PC, e.g. using Matlab or some other tool.

    1. Re:Wrong tool for the job, IMO by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      If the student has a bit larger budget, then the Rigol DS1052E or the newer DS1074Z is a really hard to beat value.

      Be careful here. I've seen these at hamfests being sold by dealers, and the small print is that when you "buy" the scope that does all these wonderful things for $1499 (or whatever price) you're getting a six month license for the software that does all those wonderful things. One morning not too long after you buy your magic device you will turn it on to do something important and it will tell you that your demo license has expired and you need to send more money to Rigol.

      I think that kind of marketing is dishonest and despicable. When someone says "your price for what you are seeing is X", then that's what you should get for X, not a demo system that's going to stop working unless you pay a bundle more.

    2. Re:Wrong tool for the job, IMO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, the students would be better served with either

      1) A time machine to travel to about 1960-1975 so they can get jobs in North America.

      2) A reality-based teacher who will show them the actual job offerings out there for people in electronics.

    3. Re:Wrong tool for the job, IMO by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Be careful here. I've seen these at hamfests being sold by dealers, and the small print is that when you "buy" the scope that does all these wonderful things for $1499 (or whatever price) you're getting a six month license for the software that does all those wonderful things. One morning not too long after you buy your magic device you will turn it on to do something important and it will tell you that your demo license has expired and you need to send more money to Rigol.

      Well, the modern day scope is software-upgradable, so you buy what you need and can demo other stuff for 30 days or so (not 6 months).

      The upshot is you'll get a scope that'll function as a scope with the specs you bought - like a Rigol 1052E is a 50MHz scope (upgradable to 100MHz I think) with 2 channels. Fancy features like decoders, enhanced triggers, etc., are upgrade items.

      Though, I think the Rigol is really only around $500 now - it's original price point is now inhabited by the low end scopes of Agilent and others that give you way more functionality.

      And if you wonder what Rigol is, Agilent's low end scopes, before introducing the 2000 series, were OEM'd versions of the Rigol 1052.

      But yeah, for that budget, surplus analog scopes with 20+MHz bandwidth from the likes of Tektronix and such can be had for $50. Far better to learn with, less PC fiddling required (I can bet any PC scope you buy, most of the weekend would be consumed with just getting the thing working) and if one needs to stop work, the analog scopes remember their settings when transported.

    4. Re:Wrong tool for the job, IMO by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Well, the modern day scope is software-upgradable, so you buy what you need

      No, I buy the product as it is shown to me. Saying I only "buy what I need" is like buying a Ferrari and then three months later it will no longer go faster than 30MPH because I "didn't need" all that extra speed for the city driving I was doing.

      When a salesman shows me all the great stuff his product will do and tells me the price, I assume, correctly, that when I buy that product at that price it will do all the great stuff he showed me.

      The upshot is you'll get a scope that'll function as a scope with the specs you bought

      For three months. And then it won't.

    5. Re:Wrong tool for the job, IMO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought a signalhound for work for just over $1k to keep the firmware guys at my company from taking the fieldfoxes or more expensive spectrum analyzers out of the lab. It is a very good tool for basic RF diagnostic work.

      While there are some lower end scopes it's really hard to get anything decent new for under $1K and picoscope makes some very nice scopes for around $1K are good enough for many types of troubleshooting problems. That may sound like a lot, but when you consider the for many modern electronics standards like PCIe that you can easily spend 100 times that amount for an oscilloscope to do compliance level testing of the physical interface it's really a bargain.

      Used equipment is a good option, but you would be better if you could test it out, make sure all the probes work, etc.

    6. Re:Wrong tool for the job, IMO by janoc · · Score: 1

      I have actually owned DS1052E, that one is not sw upgradable, no hidden surprises there. DS1074Z is on my desk today and you get something like 50 hours of usage from some advanced things like I2C/SPI decoding and triggering or double sample memory. Buying those options is not very expensive neither, but then there is also http://riglol.3owl.com/ if you want.

    7. Re:Wrong tool for the job, IMO by janoc · · Score: 1

      Actually the new DS1074Z is $500 bucks now (got one recently), the -S version with the built-in sig gen is $800. The old DS1052E is still being sold for about $400 new, but the DS1074Z is a much better deal - 4 channels, much faster waveform update, larger sample memory, intensity graded display, etc. It is more comparable to the 2000 series than the old DS1000 one.

      I think it is pretty comparable with the low end Agilents also (which are actually rebadged Rigols sold for higher price - Rigol is OEM for Agilent).

      The Agilent 2000 series is a higher class instrument, then you are in the $2000+ price category.

    8. Re:Wrong tool for the job, IMO by janoc · · Score: 1

      Actually, it is being sold in reverse - you buy the DS1074Z for e.g. $500 and you get the basic scope as specced + some 50 hours of demo of extra features that would normally drive the cost to those $1500 if you buy all of them. You try whether you like them and if you do, you pay for the options (or use a keygen - Rigols were hacked long time ago).

      However, if you are buying one of these from a shady dealer somewhere at a hamfest being sold out of a car boot and without doing your homework, you get what you pay for. I want the thing to have at least calibration and warranty, so I buy it from a proper dealer - that's where I have got mine from a month ago (for ~500 EUR, VAT included: http://ovio-scope.com/index.ph... ).

  30. Student Priced probe by wgaryhas · · Score: 1

    Digilent's Analog Discovery is a good option if you can get the $99 student pricing.

    2 Channels scope, 100 Msps, 2 channel function generator, 16 digital logic channels, 2 external triggers.

    Software comes with a sdk.

    --
    "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." - H.L. Mencken
  31. Re:Why? by dfsmith · · Score: 1

    Nobody needs to learn to drive any more. We can teleconference everywhere. If you need your body to be somewhere, just rent a taxi! It's all virtual these days.

  32. Analog Discovery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As usual, there are cheaper gadgets you can buy if you are a student. Let me do some slashvertisement here. It is a little bit outside the budget, but it does something more than just oscilloscope:
    www.digilentinc.com/analogdiscovery/
    * Two channel oscilloscope, up to 5MHz bandwidth
    * Two channel arbitrary function generator
    * Stereo audio amplifier
    * 16 channel digital logic analyzer, up to 100Msample/sec
    * 16 channel pattern generator
    Etc etc

  33. DSO Nano by dfsmith · · Score: 1

    The series of Seeed oscilloscopes are a bit clunky, but otherwise reasonable.

  34. Buy a second-hand Oscilloscope instead. by MindPrison · · Score: 4, Informative

    50-70$ will give your students a good if not excellent used analog scope such as suggested from numerous members in here

    Other than eBay, less obvious sources for getting a scope on the cheap would be your local HAM (radio amateur) club, there is always one in your city, look them up (they're really friendly and love new faces). Another way to get some cheap scopes, is to visit the various electronics repairshops, service dept. etc. Ask nicely, perhaps bring a free pizza to the overworked technicians, and who knows? Maybe you'll end up with a Scope for the price of a decent pizza slice. (I KID YOU NOT, I've heard friends of mine who have done this, and even gotten a free Spectrum Analyzer, albeit old...but working).

    Yet another source is the various tech-schools out there, they have old surplus equipment too, one of my friends also got a serious stash of scopes from them, perfectly legal. You could even look up military surplus sales, they often sell truckloads of much better stuff, some people make a killing buying pallets of Scopes, analyzers, bench multimeters, solder stations and much more from the military auctions, and re-sell them for seriously high prices on eBay.

    A few things you may want to know about old scopes though, is that they are FRAGILE. Scopes around 20mhz are useful for low-end digital experiments and standard old audio & CCTV repair and experimentation (enough to teach you!) A 100 mhz scope throws you into the digital era, you don't need much more than that. When you find one (beggars can't be choosers, but if you pay a little...) then you may want to check that all the knobs are okay (yes, you can lube them yourself, but check for broken plastic bits, if it breaks - stay away), Good strong CRT (no hefty burn-ins or weak display), also look for the famous LOST TRACE (this means loose parts inside, again...stay away unless you know what you're doing).

    A couple of good scope probes can be as expensive as the instrument itself, you may actually want to purchase those from China, they're okay...and cheap. Test leads are the only thing I recommend people to purchase new, because they take the most beating.

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
  35. Embedded Artists Labtool by aa1ww · · Score: 1

    Tim / fffdddooo (3692429), Not unlike the Digilent Analog Discovery product (2 channels, 5MHz analog BW), the Embedded Artists Labtool offers 2 channels @ 6MHz analog BW and a AWS generator. The cost is $139USD or $99EU. The URL is: http://www.embeddedartists.com... and it's available from distributors like Mouser.com I think Digilent is ahead with delivered courseware. I'm a community college professor at stcc.edu and I'm looking at the same ideas. One of the milestones for our beginner student is getting the whole time-domain mentality across to them (think ... DuMont Oscillagraph :-) ). Despite my dinosaur upbringing with big Tek 515's and 535's, I think our students could use these PC-peripheral style instruments with no loss of meaning. In actual practice I think we could accomplish our goals with a 200KHz 'scope just as well. As I'm sure you're already aware, most frequency domain discussion nowadays can be effected using FFT software + a digital sampling oscilloscope. Obviously any truly RF stuff is going to require something beyond these low-cost instruments but, for around the same price as a textbook, they can have a scope and signal generator as a takeaway. Best Wishes, Coop

    1. Re:Embedded Artists Labtool by aa1ww · · Score: 1

      Forgot to mention ..... With digital sampling scopes: (1) be they standalone units or PC peripherals, the student get a way to document their screenshots; and (2) they can catch a useful range of single-shot events.

    2. Re:Embedded Artists Labtool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I took screenshots of a CRT when I was in school 20 years ago. It's not rocket science. Sure, at the time I was the only one in the entire school with a scope and an Amiga with DigiView..

      Also, don't call them sampling scopes, they're just digital. A "sampling" scope is an entire other beast completely.

  36. Hack a Day by zerosomething · · Score: 1

    Hack A Day has a few options for DIY and sourcing used scopes. http://hackaday.com/?s=oscillo...

    --
    It all starts at 0
  37. Product Review by bigwheel · · Score: 1

    Here's a product review of a handful of small, inexpensive oscilloscopes. http://www.jameco.com/Jameco/w... They look kind of handy compared to my ancient HP.

  38. Rugged Oscilloscopes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone know of any good rugged oscilloscopes for e.g. use out in the field? Meeting area classification a bonus.

    1. Re:Rugged Oscilloscopes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The DSO mini's you find on Amazon are built into a cellphone case, so just throw an Otterbox-like case on it. OR you can get a USB oscope like a Picoscope and attach it to a Panasonic Toughbook.

  39. Look for national lab salvage / surpluss by joe_frisch · · Score: 2

    A number of labs like SLAC have a salvage department that collects old, but sometimes still functional equipment. If you are associated with an educational institution you might be able to get some of this stuff for free. It will be old but probably fine for some types or student experiments .

    1. Re:Look for national lab salvage / surpluss by vandamme · · Score: 1

      I got rid of a 8 foot tall stack of HP & Tek gear a couple weeks ago. Some of it worked, wasn't calibrated or anything.

  40. $199 Labnation Smartscope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Smartscope, US$ 199, open source USB oscilloscope / logic analyzer / arbitrary waveform generator (and optionally Xilinx Spartan 6 FPGA dev kit) was recently kickstarted, it is expected to ship by August 1st. Supports Linux, Windows XP/7/8 (PC version), Mac OS, Android & (jailbroken) iOS.

    Anyway, also buy a cheap 2nd hand analog oscilloscope (under $50), you will learn a lot from that.

  41. Re:Why? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    Nothing is purely digital when it comes to actual hardware, it's just really fast analog.

  42. or $2 unbuffered hardware by raymorris · · Score: 1

    If you're not too worried about the source having enough power to ruin anything, the hardware can consist of a resistor, a variable resistor (volume knob) and two wires. Just be sure to turn the knob all the way down to 1M ohm before connecting to an unknown source. Then slowly turn it up until you see a sufficient signal.

  43. Sys Comp Design - Cirguit Gear by icknay · · Score: 1

    Check out the circuit-gear units. The new "mini" is just $99 http://www.syscompdesign.com/C... I have the previous generation unit. I've enjoyed it for just hacking around, and it's great for demos, since the computer it's hooked up to can be projected. The GUI software for it is open-source, so that's neat.

  44. Snooty AC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And the AC Electronic Snobs are out in full force.

  45. Re:Why? by Grishnakh · · Score: 0

    Better yet, forget all that stuff and teach them to arrange clothing at a store like Abercrombie or to make a coffee at Starbuck's, because that's where all the jobs in the future will be: retail.

  46. What bandwidth do you need? by Animats · · Score: 1

    The price of scopes goes up rapidly with bandwidth. 20MHz is cheap. 100MHz is more expensive. 1GHz and up is very expensive. Tektronix sells a 33GHz scope starting at $30K. That's the first question you have to ask. For kids doing Arduino-level elecronics, 20MHz is fine. None of the I/O goes faster than that. (If you want to look at Ethernet or digital video signals, you need far more bandwith, more than you can afford. Fortunately, today that stuff mostly works.

    (Back in the 1990s, I was trying to build a LIDAR unit for a robot. The parts aren't expensive. The problem is that, when it didn't work right, I needed a high-bandwidth scope I didn't have to find out why.)

    1. Re:What bandwidth do you need? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kids doing arduino stuff don't need a scope. What for?

    2. Re:What bandwidth do you need? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and THAT's what sampling scopes are for ^_^

    3. Re:What bandwidth do you need? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To see the signals they are producing. Troubleshooting PWM outputs. Watching the DIO switch on and off. A bunch of stuff. Not everyone knows everything like you do AC. It's not a have to have item, but any good electronics teacher should be showing the students how to not only build their amplifier, but also the TMDE used to repair it.

    4. Re:What bandwidth do you need? by Mr.CRC · · Score: 1

      Not a 33GHz real-time scope for $30000, but maybe a sampling scope chassis. Try $230000 for real time scopes with that BW.

    5. Re:What bandwidth do you need? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But why? You just need a cheap and cheerful voltmeter for those things!

  47. underclock to use low bandwidth scope on high freq by raymorris · · Score: 1

    I wanted to scope a signal that required about 1Mhz of resolution, but do it for $2 using a sound card that only goes to 20Khz. The $2 solution was a much slower crystal for the circuit under test.

  48. XMEGA Xprotolab by danceswithtrees · · Score: 1

    Somewhat surprised no one has mentioned Xprotolab yet.

    http://www.gabotronics.com/dev...

    8 channel logic analyzer at 2MSPS (3.3V)
    2 channel analog at 2MSPS, 200kHz analog bandwidth, -14 to +20V inputs
    Small OLED display
    1.6" x 1"
    As an extra bonus prize, arbitrary waveform generator!!
    $49

    Never tried one personally-- tempted but I think my Tek would get jealous.

    1. Re:XMEGA Xprotolab by cuog · · Score: 1

      I have one of these and they're pretty awesome for basic slow signal testing. I haven't used the computer interface but its awesome as a cheap pocket scope.

  49. sigrok by swissunix · · Score: 1

    Be sure to get one supported by the excellent opensource sigrok library

  50. DSO Nano by chihowa · · Score: 1

    The DSO Nano from Seeed Studio almost fits that bill. The specs aren't amazing, but at $89 with its own screen it's useful for education or light tasks. I keep one in my bag for emergency troubleshooting in the field.

    They have a more capable version, too, for anyone who's interested.

    --
    If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
  51. RTL-SDR spectrum analyzer by Mr2cents · · Score: 2

    Instead of a spectrum analyzer, you can use an RTL-SDR dongle as described here. Sure it has a lot of limitations, but it only costs you 10$, and with the scanner software you can get a very wide bandwidth.

    --
    "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    1. Re:RTL-SDR spectrum analyzer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and with the scanner software you can get a very wide bandwidth.

      But with a low frequency limitation of 24MHz. Totally useless for any non-RF uses.

      I have a lot of RTL-SDR dongles, they are very useful for radio surveying, scanning etc, but I wouldn't recommend one as a replacement for a scope as they don't sample DC, and the ones I modified to sample DC (by bypassing the tuner IC) didn't work so well and were absolutely littered with artifacts.

  52. The best advice is not by me but by by maliqua · · Score: 1

    Dave from eevblog he does a lot of reviews of this type of hardware

    http://www.eevblog.com/2010/05...

    or check this search to see a lot of reviews of specific ones old and new
    https://www.youtube.com/user/E...

    no i'm not affiliated with EEVblog its not click bait its just the best reference material i know to help this in his decision

    tl;dr
    buy a used analog one they're often cheap or free

    1. Re:The best advice is not by me but by by ZorroXXX · · Score: 1

      Yes, upon I reading the summary my immediate thought was to link to http://www.eevblog.com/2009/06....

      --
      When you are sure of something, you probably are wrong (search for "Unskilled and Unaware of It").
    2. Re:The best advice is not by me but by by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either I am in a bad location for this stuff, or I have cheap friends, but I have been looking for any somewhat decent budget scope for over a year now with no luck. A 20MHz analog scope would be perfect for what I need, but I am only seeing them locally on Kijiji / Craigslist for $200+. Sigh.

  53. DPScope by heypete · · Score: 1

    I have a DPScope and rather like it.

    It's not a super advanced scope, and doesn't compare to standalone scopes like the Rigol DS1052E, but for someone on a budget who has fairly basic needs, it's worth a shot. It was developed by a guy who was annoyed at the drawbacks of other PC-based oscilloscopes and their software.

    I use mine for testing homebuilt electronics, and it does well for that. I wouldn't use it for anything significantly more than that sort of stuff, though.

  54. Equivalent soundcard oscilloscope for Windows. by the+frizz · · Score: 1

    If you are a windows user, Christian Zeitnitz offers a PC based Soundcard Oscilloscope free for non-commercial use. It also has a frequency spectrum waterfall diagram, x-y plots. Easy to install and run. Fun to speak into your microphone to test it out.

    Only suitable audio speed signals like XOScope. I.e., 20-20000Hz from 44.1kHz sampling and 16-bit resolution. And without external hardware voltage dividers/protection the usual warnings about blowing up your soundcard if you feed in voltage outside of ±0.7V into it.

  55. Baudline by Docasman · · Score: 1

    From their website:
    "Baudline is a time-frequency browser designed for scientific visualization of the spectral domain. Signal analysis is performed by Fourier, correlation, and raster transforms that create colorful spectrograms with vibrant detail. Conduct test and measurement experiments with the built in function generator, or play back audio files with a multitude of effects and filters. The baudline signal analyzer combines fast digital signal processing, versatile high speed displays, and continuous capture tools for hunting down and studying elusive signal characteristics."

    I have used it also as an oscilloscope (waveform wiindow). Runs on linux and osx.

    Official website.

    1. Re:Baudline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with baudline. If you need to convert a sound signal to a spectrograph, here's a small list of spectral analyzers that I like:
      - baudline http://www.baudline.com/ This is probably the best for what he is looking for. Runs on *nix. This runs live with your source.
      - arss http://arss.sourceforge.net/ Tutorial: http://www.freesoftwaremagazine.com/articles/painting_sound_arss_and_gimp Runs on linux and windows. This is good if you want to do some postprocessing and such as it can be scripted. This doesn't run live. The benefits of arss are that its scriptable and can convert from sounds to picture, then picture back to sound. There's also http://photosounder.com/ & http://photosounder.com/spiral/ projects.
      - winamp http://www.winamp.com/ (when I checked last a few years ago, it comes with a scrolling spectral analyzer) Runs on linux (via wine) and windows.

  56. University surplus by Khashishi · · Score: 1

    Research universities have tons of old junk that they would love to get rid of for very little cost.

  57. Re:Wrong tool for the budget by petes_PoV · · Score: 1

    A used Tektronix or Hameg scope will beat the pants off of any PC-based toy

    Looking on eBay, a s/h HAMEG will start at 5 times the budget specified in the original question. Even more once shipping charges are added. So while you may be correct: that a "proper" 'scope will beat one of the PC scopes, your solution fails due to completely missing the price constraints.

    And if you want to provision equipment for a whole class of students, finding s/h gear piecemeal on the internet is not a practical solution, since it doesn't scale beyond one or two "lucky" buyers.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
  58. FPGA Scope by bjs555 · · Score: 1

    Here's a 100 mega samples per sec digital scope that can be built for $92.70. It's based on a floating point gate array.
    http://www.fpga4fun.com/Hands-...

    The parts for it can be purchased here.
    http://www.knjn.com/

    1. Re:FPGA Scope by bjs555 · · Score: 1

      Oops ... meant to say field programmable gate array.

  59. MSO-19 Mixed Signal Oscilloscope by tkrmnz · · Score: 2

    I know this might be out of your budget but have you looked at the MSO-19? http://linkinstruments.com/mso... I designed this as the training tool for my high school FIRST Tech Challenge team the Landroids. They used it to develop various custom Arduino & AtTiny based sensor array for their award winning robots http://youtu.be/zRwOx2D7WCw . I packed enough features in the scope so the students can tackle FPGA based projects when the need arises. It was selected by NASA as the only oscilloscope on the ISS. And the best part is that it is designed and manufactured in NJ/PA to demonstrate that affordable manufacturing can still exist in the USA.

  60. lol by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

    There's this new thing called "Ebay"
    http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html...

    In all seriousness though, for what you are looking for they are about $70
    I went with a used bench-top model myself because the analog display looks cool and I don't really need all the features. I'm just a hobbyist and not in need of what your students will be doing.

  61. USBee or 2nd hand Tektronix by pev · · Score: 1

    Ive a lot of time for the usbee - analog and logic analysis and basic decoding of serial protocols too. I also love the fact it can do long term signal capture / recording too. Yes you can buy chinese knock offs but really, have some decency and support small companies making Cool Shit.

    For my own money i have an old cathode tek and an old lcd 60mhz tekscope that i bought on fleabay thats damn handy. Also keep an eye out for cheap old fluke scopemeters too...

  62. CT Scope by tcheleao · · Score: 1

    Emerson Electric provide CT Scope for free. For years. Just register to download it.
    http://www.emersonindustrial.com/en-en/controltechniques/products/software/commissioning/ctscope/Pages/default.aspx
    Good Luck.

  63. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You think this distinction is relevant to 99.9% of what the OP wants to do? Or what most people want to do?

    You gonna bust out the 100GHz sampling scope to look at a 555 because you want to measure neutrinos?

    You're nuts.

    A scope is vast overkill for most hobby-level electronics today. We are on the shoulders of giants, why are you worried about shoes?

  64. Bitscope by recharged95 · · Score: 1

    They have a new product for under 150.
    http://www.bitscope.com/produc...

    But I've been very happy with my Bitscope 10 + assortment of probes (if you can spring for that). Does everything, s/w is a bit 00's (features), but rock solid and has an API for writing your own software. If you can spring the extra 150, you can just get a real scope+analyzer vs high latency toy. Have used them on both Windows and Linux, no issues.

  65. PCD Scope from PICAXE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't tried this yet but it sounds promising for low level debugging.

    http://www.picaxe.com/Hardware/Add-on-Modules/PCB-scope/

  66. Bitscope Micro by ColaMan · · Score: 1

    Bitscope Micro - USB , 40MS/s, USD95 in quantities of 10 or more.

    Fairly decent set of software tools for it (including a basic FFT spectrum analyser and a protocol decoder that can do UART / SPI / Canbus.) Software runs on windows/linux and Raspberry Pi - You can download the software and tinker with a few bitscopes that are online to get a feel for it.

    Specs here

    --

    You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
    There is a lot of hype here.
  67. xprotolab or teensy 3.1 by cpotoso · · Score: 1
    xprotolab or teensy 3.1

    Check out xprotolab (http://www.gabotronics.com/development-boards/xmega-xprotolab.htm) from Gabotronics. Not too fast or too easy to use but it is very capable and Gabo provides very good support. It is self-contained (small oled screen) but can also send info to PC over USB.

    Also, the "arduino" teensy 3.1 could be used to make a USB-based scope for ca. $20 (plus some additional parts) and can have a lot of other cool uses too. Check it out: http://www.pjrc.com/teensy/tee... and http://forum.pjrc.com/threads/....

  68. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Troll AC is fail. Logic analyzer's whole job is to show SPECIFIC waveforms. The wave being square doesn't change this.

    In other words...

    You know nothing, AC.

  69. Re: I've not seen anything good for under about $3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You need to look around more.

      $300 gets you a quite usable Chinese dual input DSO with true 1gs.

    Things have come a long way..

  70. Fucking hipster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OOOOO so snobbish of you, Sir Hipster. The guy asked for the best cheap ass car and you told him to fuck off and buy a Ferrari. DSO Nanos work fine, especially for a student.

    1. Re:Fucking hipster by umafuckit · · Score: 1

      No he didn't . You just didn't understand what he said.

    2. Re:Fucking hipster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your cheap ass sillyscopes are next to useless for anything that matters and calling people snobs and hipsters isn't going to change that.

  71. Yes, AliExpress.com by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    He's correct:

    20 MHz oscilloscope at AliExpress, $61.99 delivered. USB, use a computer for the display.

    60 MHz oscilloscope at AliExpress, $308.00 delivered. Complete with display.

    1. Re:Yes, AliExpress.com by ttucker · · Score: 1

      When $300 for Alibaba knockoff stuff seems like a great deal, we are talking about a very expensive thing. Newer Tektronix equipment costs orders of magnitude more. In this market, even though it is possible to buy something for $300, it is still a very tiny budget.

  72. Re:It's all junk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China has improved.
    Try a Rigol.

  73. Oscilloscope by sgunhouse · · Score: 1

    Back in what has to qualify as the computer stone age, a high school Biology teacher I worked with got a bunch of A/D converters and wired them to his networked C-64s, I wrote the software myself. We were measuring the acceleration of gravity (okay, not a Biology experiment, but he saw it in a magazine and wanted to try it himself) and graphing student's heartbeats and so on - in 1986. So really, the oscilloscope part is trivial. Might even be able to use the existing A/D and DSP from the sound card, if you can figure out how to feed your signal to the Mic. input. (Yes, 1986 - the school board wanted him to upgrade to PC XTs, he preferred to use what he had. When they saw what we did with those old C-64s, all they could do was scratch their heads.)

  74. Re: I've not seen anything good for under about $3 by mark-t · · Score: 1

    Perhaps I should have mentioned that at the time I was looking for an analog oscilloscope.

  75. Re:It's all junk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is all junk. Having mounted a serious attempt to design and build an oscilloscope, I realized I was not saving a ton of money by doing it myself, even assuming my time is free. The majority of the cost of modern oscilloscopes is, surprise! the hardware. They're selling enough that the relatively small margin they do make pays for R&D (though I would assume that phase amounted to copying some reference designs...).

    Well, except for software lockouts. Fuck software lockouts.

  76. probes for soundcard scope by aberson · · Score: 1

    as others have said, soundcard-based scopes would be the simplest and easiest (if the work you'll be doing will fall within the bandwidth)

    A set of probes will help - this set has some protection circuitry built in: http://www.virtins.com/P601PC-...

    For extra insurance, use a cheap USB sound-card instead of the line-in on your laptop... much easier to replace the USB one when (not if) you blow the input.

  77. A myDAQ is what you need by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

    I use this in my classes — the myDAQ from National Instruments (DAQ=digital acquisition).

    It's USB plug-and-play, with a few basics like oscilloscope (200 kS/s, 16-bit), DSA (digital signal analyzer), signal generator, and Bode analyzer built-in, through use of it's "ELVISmx Instrument Launcher." Better yet is that it comes with a non-expiring copy of LabView.

    It has:
    * DMM ports (digital multimeter)
    * 8 digital I/O
    * A/D audio I/O, +/-2 V
    * A/D I/O, +/- 10V
    * Power supply +/- 15 V
    * Counter

    Cost it $180, for example through www.studica.com.

  78. Re:Forget spectrum analyzer - there is no decent by Technician · · Score: 1

    If you are a student and working in the analog range, there are some great software audio RTA spectrum analizers out there. With an aftermarket analog interface, 16 bit stereo 96KHZ sample rates are supported for low quanitization error and allising at the high end.

    My super cheap interface cost me $15, supports 16 bit stereo for wide dynamic range (lower noise floor by far over my internal sound card) and 44.1 or 48KHZ sample rates. With free Audacity to generate sweep tones, and JAPA RTA software, I can sweep filters, phase lock loop filters, speakers, rooms, etc for well within budget. With cheap, but up to spec sound interfaces, they can be used for student and semi pro work.

    Not a slashvertisement, but the innexpensive interface I am using is one of the Behringer U-Control series. With Audacity as my function generator for Sine, Triangle, Square, or sawtooth, I can sweep linear or log over any reasonable audio frequency range I need. With JAPA on Linux patched with Jack, and input from the interface, I have over 100 DB of dynamic range on most frequencies in the 20-20K range. Any cheap 8 bit scope card simply does not have the resolution for this. Use what works best, even if it is cheaper.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  79. Expeyes is what you want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://expeyes.in/ is what you are looking. Very very powerful and cheap. Compleate open source hardware and software design.

  80. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I simulate your mom on my dick every night

  81. Low sample rates really are quite useful. by Sanians · · Score: 1

    Low-frequency solutions are no substitute for what an actual oscilloscope can do, but when you're trying to learn electronics, being able to see what the circuit is doing at all is far better than just guessing what it is doing. Multimeters have a use despite their 1 Hz sample rate, and a measly 20 kHz sample rate is going to be much more useful than that.

    That said, just as soon as you can replace them with anything else, you'll decide that sound cards suck.

    My present favorite solution is to use an FT245RL (a $5 USB chip that implements a simple parallel FIFO buffer, with drivers for Linux and FreeBSD already in your kernel) along with an AT89S52 (a $1 re-programmable microcontroller with 32 I/O pins, though I usually end up dedicating 15 of them to the programming interface and communication with the FT245RL, leaving only 17 for general-purpose use) and just write little programs for the microcontroller to read/write whatever data I want and transfer it to/from the PC. I even built my own programmer for the AT89S52 using the same two chips and a Perl script. (Naturally, the AT89S52 used in the programmer was programmed via other means -- I used a parallel port.) This generally allows me to do anything digital that I want to do. (Obviously my wants aren't that great.)

    For analog, I attach a MCP3301 ($3 12-bit ADC w/ SPI interface) to the FT245RL & AT89S52 combo, which allows reading everything from DC up to 100 kS/s. At $3 a chip, adding multiple channels is inexpensive as well, and I've used up to eight simultaneously, driving them all with the same control signals and just reading the resulting eight data bits in parallel. While this is barely better than audio frequencies, the major advantages are that there is no DC filtering, and that you actually know what input voltages correspond to the values you read from the ADC. Sound cards are really only meant to record frequencies and relative amplitudes.

    Of course, at this point you're up to about $25 to $50 depending on how much stuff you had to buy and how much stuff you already had, and you've invested a hell of a lot of your time. Time is quite valuable. Spend enough of it and you might as well have picked up a second job and just earned the money to buy that oscilloscope. ...but if you are a student, putting these chips together is kind of something you should be learning how to do. The big time-waster for me was the software, as I wrote an assembler, a script to drive the programmer, software to run in the microcontrollers, and any software needed on the PC to record and display data.

    So a sound card is a rather attractive solution to people who don't already have an oscilloscope and can't justify the expense of one. The needed components are minimal, and the software already exists. Sure, sound cards can't measure DC, but you probably have a multimeter that can, and anything not DC, like a 0.1 Hz square wave, is still going to be visible as little spikes which at least lets you know something is going on, which is better than not knowing. Only very low frequency sine waves aren't going to be visible at all, but they're not that common, and in fact are rather hard to generate.

  82. Craigslist by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    I think this is the best bet. One can get a REAL oscilloscope that's used for a very reasonable price. Sure, it may have a floppy drive instead of thumb drive for exporting images, or no export at all, but for student use and demonstrations that should be fine. I'd check ebay too, or a local electronics warehouse type store.

  83. Red Pitaya Quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The best option for students needing cheap and versatile measuring equipment. would be the Red Pitaya.

    I have found that the Red Pitaya analog side is a bit weak. The digital side makes for an interesting platform, but IMO the whole package does not achieve the instrument-grade quality I had hoped. Significant spurs and wandering sample rates mean you can really only expect to use it at very low frequencies (think 100 kHz, max). A nice soundcard can be made to do the same thing for a far lower cost.

    1. Re:Red Pitaya Quality by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      To take full advantage of the capabilities of the Red Pitaya you need to put it in a shielded box and to power it with something cleaner than a USB tablet charger. The spurs that you are seeing are probably noise from the power supply or from the local RF environment. When I run a casual test on the spectrum analyzer on my Red Pitaya (sitting on the bench in the open and powered by a USB charger) I can see discernable peaks that correspond to the carrier frequencies of local AM broadcast stations with nothing at all connected to the inputs. The stations are not in my back yard; they are 5 to 20 miles away.

      In any case, a device that sells for about $500 is way out of the league of the OP. And to use it as an oscilloscope you would also need to build an input buffer and attenuator. And buy probes and SMA adapters.

  84. There's an app for that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://itunes.apple.com/nl/app/spectrumview/id472662922?mt=8

  85. Various options by joelholdsworth · · Score: 1

    Take a look at the sigrok project. We have rather a lot of experience with low cost lab gear.

    For a long time the best option for a standalone scope has been the Das Oszi scopes, sold under the brand names Hantek, Protek and Voltcraft. As a bonus, a guy name tinhead has reverse engineered the schematics. Hopefully we'll have it supported in sigrok very soon.

    There's also the SmartScope for ~$180.

  86. syscompdesign, CircuitGear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quite a bit over the OP's budget at $189 but perhaps worth a mention, nice little thingy with open source software:
    http://www.syscompdesign.com/CircuitGear_p_8.html

    oh, and apparently a mini for $99:
    http://www.syscompdesign.com/CircuitGear-Mini_p_29.html

  87. For the love of god look on kickstarter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For ~$199 with the oscilloscope front end, I like the DSLogic because it has a very deep on-board buffer - 32 MiB - which is actually critical in a cheap USB 2.0 device.

    This is because, when the USB 2.0 spec added 480Mbit/s Hi-Speed, they upped the speed from 12 Mbit/s and forgot to also require usb root hubs to add DMA within the PC to take the data away.
    And so whatever your OS is, it'll just never reliably handle keeping the data moving. The existing USB fifo chips that support HiSpeed have woefully underequiped buffers to maintain flow should the PC "go to lunch" for more than a few 10's of microseconds.

    This is why Hi Speed is 48MiB/s on paper, and usually only reliably sustains maybe 20 MB/s. The saleae suffers particularly from this - it's only got 2kB of buffer, guess how long that lasts?
    Good USB 2.0 HiSpeed devices will have at least 8MiB of addition buffer to cover for the ~millisec gaps the PC OS will add. This means at least an FPGA plus a DRAM chip - exactly what the DSLogic has.

    Most cheap USB 2.0 oscilloscopes omit the extra buffer, and consequently keep dropping out: The saleae will give and error message saying "sorry, but it appears your PC can't keep up with this sample rate". They are right, it is actually the PC's fault - but only because in order to get back to the USB transfer within the ~30 us window is a bit optimistic, unless the whole OS is written with that in mind as the firstmost priority, and getting even rtlinux to do this is actually near impossible - the jitter is usually closer to 100 us.

    USB 3.0 doesn't have this problem, (it has DMA!) but all the devices that support it will probably be above your price range - nearest I can think of is the BladeRF, but it only supports from 27 MHz to 6 GHz, and it's really aimed at SDR more so than reliable oscilloscope capture.
    (Forget cheap SDR "digital tv" dongles: they only really do ~ 10 MB/s over USB 2.0, and they very often drop packets. The radio coding for digital tv simply allows for the occasional data loss that results, so they mostly work for their intended purpose anyway.)

    Forget anything firewire - it has DMA, but it's protocol, while efficient, is far too complicated, and cheap chips that can talk it just don't exist, even for the "slower" old 400 Mbps standard.

    You may also want to try the Lab-Nation SmartScope, at $179, but it's only got 2MiB of buffer. The plus for it is that it has really good iOS/Android integration, but that short buffer will limit you.

    There's also a new 10 GHz BW oscilloscope on there which is just starting up - but it doesn't appear to have any buffer at all, instead requiring many partial captures of a repetitive signal to form a clear picture. This may be ok, depending on what you're doing, but it's no good for capturing real world "once off" signals. Ok for debugging really high speed serial links though.

    If slow sample rates (~100kHz) are useful, check out Xprotolab's handhelds!

    1. Re:For the love of god look on kickstarter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may also want to try the Lab-Nation SmartScope, at $179, but it's only got 2MiB of buffer. The plus for it is that it has really good iOS/Android integration, but that short buffer will limit you.

      From their second-latest update (Project update #21):

      "As it turns out, the cost difference between the 16Mbit version and the 64Mbit version is not that large. Especially not compared to the added value it would bring to the SmartScope: it would quadruple the number of samples to be stored on each channel from 1M to 4M! So we made the decision: all RAM SmartScopes will by default be fitted with 64Mbit of DRAM!"

  88. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pretty much, yeah. What do you want me to say? Market-driven universities churn out the EE grads like industrial cookies on a conveyor belt.

    What market, you ask? The government loan market of course.

  89. XProtoLAB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.gabotronics.com/development-boards/xmega-xprotolab.htm

    If you dig around on their site, you can see they have multiple variations. All inexpensive. All pretty full featured.

  90. Different question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How expensive does a decent-to-good quality 'scope need to be? In other words, what's in there and what sort of price tag can you expect for even just the bag of parts and why? Taking this further, how about an open source design, with various construction options according to local part availability?

  91. DSLogic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OP might be interested in this Kickstarter from a short time ago:
    https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/dreamsourcelab/dslogic-multifunction-instruments-for-everyone

  92. Oscilloscope by GabeGuillen · · Score: 1

    Here is a link to an instrument (CGR-101) that I purchased a few years ago. The equipment is manufactured in Toronto. http://www.syscompdesign.com/I... The software is open source and can be used with Linux, Windows or Mac. I have found this product to be extremely useful and versatile. All of the required components will fit in a laptop case.

  93. Vintage, old but still excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've seen a lot of old, but still very good, analog scopes sold on eBay for a tiny fraction of what a new modern scope with the same specs would cost.

    They might be heavy and hot, but they are very repairable if they ever break.

    I'd be surprised if you couldn't find a nice 40 MHz scope for $50 to $100 (depending on extra's and cosmetic state) or a really nice 100 MHz Tectronics with several add-ons for about $250.

  94. Arduino TVout + upcycled analog TV+ATmega328 ~$10 by An+dochasac · · Score: 1

    I used this Oscilloscope based on an Arduino and ATMega328 running with a 16MHz crystal. It's more of a toy/demo scope, not even great for audio frequencies and for lower scales you probably want to add an instrumentation amp front end. The thing I like about it is that it reuses/upcycles all of those pocket NTSC (or PAL) analog TVs obsoleted by the FCC a couple of years ago.

  95. Oscilloscope and Network Analysis by Agripa · · Score: 1

    I generally recommend against USB test instruments because of their shortcomings but for a USB based oscilloscope, I would at least get one which supports network analysis which may be particularly useful for students:

    http://www.syscompdesign.com/C...
    http://www.syscompdesign.com/C...