Slashdot Mirror
Google To Take On Apple's CarPlay
cartechboy (2660665) writes with news that Google is working on software to complete with Apple's CarPlay car dashboard software: Google is set to unveil its own automotive operating system known internally as Google Auto Link. The search giant plans to unveil its system at a software developer conference this month. Interestingly, Auto Link is the first production developed in conjunction with the Open Automotive Alliance, a group of companies including Audi, General Motors, Honda, Hyundai, NVIDIA, and Google itself. Like CarPlay, Auto Link won't be an "embedded" system, rather, a "projected" one--an operating system that uses a driver's own smartphone operating system. We'll obviously learn details soon enough, but for now, we are left to wonder whether it'll be Apple or Google that ends up owning the automotive market.
Why would it have to be exclusive?
Car makers can simply support both protocols in their built in systems and whatever device you bring just pairs up with it.
Why would an automaker want to exclude potential customers by only supporting one method or the other is the question you need to ask. Unless Apple or Google is subsidising the cost of the car they just want to make the most attractive package possible and sell more cars.
iphone is a keyboard and a tv-set away from being a full-fledged computer for 99% of the population.
So this is basically a smartphone app to feed a Bluetooth audio stream to the car's audio system, which is designed exactly for this anyway and people already do with their phones.
Got it. Project an interface -- project away and wait for the lawsuits you have no idea about but the automotive industry does.
(-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
Do we really need another standard when we already have MirrorLink? It works fine, allows the phone to display a special "car mode" homescreen, charges... What more do we need?
const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
but for now, we are left to wonder whether it'll be Apple or Google that ends up owning the automotive market.
Why does it matter? Both are evil and will create an closed system that is insecure & broken by design.
I bought a Mountek nGroove Snap car mount; Sits inside the CD slot of your stereo, holds smart phones and small tablets up to 7" using magnets and an adhesive-attached metal plate. You need to adjust it every few days, but it only takes a few seconds to do and is rock-solid afterwards.
Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
we are left to wonder whether it'll be Apple or Google that ends up owning the automotive market.
Well Apple's CarPlay is run on top of BlackBerry's QNX Car OS as are the majority of current in dash systems so for now BlackBerry is still #1.
"A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
> "We'll obviously learn details soon enough, but for now, we are left to wonder whether it'll be Apple or Google that ends up owning the automotive market." Or BlackBerry who currently is the dominant player?
Ford switches to QNX.
I dont know about other slashdotters, but Millenials like myself cant afford a brand new car, end of discussion. Years of college loans have ruined our credit score and what little we are saving is going directly toward maintaining the vehicle we already unfortunately own. For a bit less than a hundred dollars though, I can get a used car stereo and a wiring kit that lets me play music from a USB stick and over BlueTooth from my phone. If i cant afford that, I can just put my ear buds in.
I dont value a car. not like the Gen X or Y or baby boomers did. To me its nothing but oil changes, tire changes, and a lifetime of direct mail spam about my "warranty" running out or the latest bullshit deal from herpo derpersons car and truck supercenter. Its having to strap myself to an insurance company that will subrogate everything. A car just means I put up with expensive parking, gridlock traffic, tickets, and ridiculous gas prices until it dies on a hot day alongside the freeway.
what i do value is public transit. affordable busses that run every 20 minutes and light rail systems that give me time to do shit I actually care about, like browse slashdot and work. I already have a device that lets me use google or apple or whatever I need, but to strap it to a 2000 pound haggared burro doesnt help.
Good people go to bed earlier.
Like it does with the cars themselves. Not.
"Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
Am I the only one that thinks the 'car kit' and 'medical kit' endeavors for Google/Apple are a "everyone gets farked" proposition?
I installed several nav units, did the A/V thing in the car . . . and I was always totally frustrated by the lack of standardization of not only stock units (both hardware and software) but aftermarket.
If Apple/Google came up with an open standard that they both used, EVERYONE would use it, we could home brew, and it would be a win for the consumer.
is it "Open" like Android or "Open" like goatse's asshole? Because I know it's not going to be "Open" like "Open Source".
we are left to wonder whether it'll be Apple or Google that ends up owning the automotive market
Well QNX is still the #1 embedded system, and owned by Blackberry. They've demo'd full automotive interfaces (including dashboard, not just entertainment) and, I'm led to understand, CarPlay is currently running atop QNX - I doubt that ios or osx or a variant would be taken up by any car maker as an embedded system.
Regardless, wasn't there a recent survey that basically concluded that most Driver's really wanted car manufacturers to stop buggering around with in car entertainment - leave it at audio, navigation and hands free telephony and give up on all the trickery they're trying to employ to seem cool and attractive.
A "projected" OS sounds dumb to me. If you just want to get music from your phone to your stereo, then AD2P (bluetooth) works fine. For maps and other stuff, the phone can have a holster.
What I (and most people I know) want, is a stereo with a decent interface and functionality of a modern OS, without killing the phone's battery, and without needing a "phone" UI. That means maps, traffic updates, and music baked in. Let it tie in to my account so that I can purchase music and have it update the car's library whenever it has wireless (or 3G, I suppose) nearby. Let it have a GPS with Google Maps that updates automatically and is traffic-aware. It's OK if it pulls updates via the phone, but it shouldn't *require* the phone to work.
Most importantly, a dedicated OS means that there's still the ability to have a stereo-centric system that works with actual freakin' hardware knobs/buttons and not a bastardized touch interface for common controls like volume, prev/next, etc. Touch interfaces distract from driving, and also tend to have issues with certain types of weather (not to mention gloves in winter).
Just STOP.
you do NOT need to have a car specific OS, just fucking bring back "car mode" to Android. Android as it is works fantastic as a Infotainment OS once you disable the stupid screen timeout and add circuitry to wake/sleep based on car ignition status.
Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
Why do we even want these giant, built-in distractions in a vehicle when there's so many whiny and complaints about Distracted driving from hand-held devices?
I can't afford to buy a new car every 18 months to keep up with the A.D.D. that exists in the mobile product arena.
I'll buy in when the SAE adopts a standard protocol interface for in-car infotainment. For now, bluetooth does me just fine.
Google is working on software to complete with Apple's CarPlay
I'm sure glad they're working together.
... I'll have to pay extra to get a car without a fucking touch screen?
I apologize for the lack of a signature.
Oh, yes; I'm sure Apple will cover the entire market, all the way from your average Bugatti down to economy cars like Audi and even BMW!
Not only will you be able to sue the auto marker, you could sue Apple or Google, when you are in a serious accident. Don't think someone won't try.
Microsoft has had a pretty cool system in cars for a while, MS Sync. Yet much like their initial smart phone line (think Windows Pocket PC Phone), it felt like they put a half ass effort in and never did anything to push it forward. I can see this happening again, only to have them try to play catch up later, with the 'Surface Radio'