Slashdot Mirror


It's Not a Car, It's a Self-Balancing Electric Motorcycle (Video)

Two gyros under the seat keep this vehicle standing up at a stop, which is easier on the driver's legs than putting a foot down the way you do while riding most motorcycles. And no vroom-vroom sound, either. This is an electric motorcycle. The prototype you see in the video gets up to around 20 MPH, but production models are supposed to hit 100 MPH, and go as far as a Tesla S on 1/6 the juice. So little tiny batteries are all the Lit C-1 needs to drive (up to) 200 miles with the gyros spinning merrily away -- keeping the C-1 upright even in crashes, as a simulation in this Lit Motors YouTube video shows. They claim to have more than 200 pre-orders against a projected retail price of $24,000, which is not shabby for a company that hasn't made a single production vehicle so far. (Alternate Video Link)

218 comments

  1. Why does this make me think of... by TheRealSteveDallas · · Score: 0

    Mr Garrison?

    1. Re:Why does this make me think of... by i+kan+reed · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because the internet has programmed us to communicate entirely by pop culture references and oblique sexualized insults, leaving no room for actual critical examination of anything.

    2. Re:Why does this make me think of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Looks like Kyle has some sand in his vagina again.

    3. Re:Why does this make me think of... by TheRealSteveDallas · · Score: 1

      I don't know whether to agree with you or ask if that was your best "Jordy".

    4. Re:Why does this make me think of... by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 0

      Ain't nobody got time for that!

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    5. Re:Why does this make me think of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sokath, his eyes opened.

    6. Re:Why does this make me think of... by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      Martok with his mind blown.

      It never occurred to me that that episode was a dire prediction of our future.

    7. Re:Why does this make me think of... by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

      Posting to undo because I accidentally modded this redundant instead of "Fuckin' Insightful!"

    8. Re:Why does this make me think of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just see a velomobile with an engine.

  2. No by GoCrazy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's not a car.

    That's a cage. That's a car.

    --
    No beer and no TV make Homer something something
    1. Re:No by Dishevel · · Score: 2
      Not only is it NOT A MOTORCYCLE! the person talking about it has never ridden a motorcycle.

      which is easier on the driver's legs than putting a foot down the way you do while riding most motorcycles.

      First all motorcycles. Not most. Second. Who the hell ever pulled up to a stop while riding and thought "Fuck. I have to put my feet down again!"?

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    2. Re:No by SternisheFan · · Score: 5, Funny

      ... Second. Who the hell ever pulled up to a stop while riding and thought "Fuck. I have to put my feet down again!"?

      A guy I knew once told me that when he lived in Germany, he'd get very drunk every night after work, drive home on a road that he'd figured out the timing of the traffic lights so well that he never had to put his foot down even once. The only problem was he'd forget to put his foot down when he got to his destination.. So every night the homeowners knew when he arrived in the garage by hearing him and his cycle fall over. :-)

    3. Re:No by aitikin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not only is it NOT A MOTORCYCLE! the person talking about it has never ridden a motorcycle.

      which is easier on the driver's legs than putting a foot down the way you do while riding most motorcycles.

      First all motorcycles. Not most. Second. Who the hell ever pulled up to a stop while riding and thought "Fuck. I have to put my feet down again!"?

      Not all. Like it or not "trikes" are considered and labelled motorcycles. As such, your statement is not accurate.

      Second, I know a number of people who dislike it due to weaker legs/ankle injuries/etc (and thus, are attracted moreso to the trikes, which, for the record, I HATE).

      --
      "Don't meddle in the affairs of a patent dragon, for thou art tasty and good with ketchup." ~ohcrapitssteve
    4. Re:No by camperdave · · Score: 2

      Not only is it NOT A MOTORCYCLE! the person talking about it has never ridden a motorcycle.

      It is a motorcycle if the DMV* says it is.

      *... or whatever government agency is responsible for vehicle licensing.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    5. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > are considered and labelled motorcycle

      Depends on the state. Here in Washington they are not motorcycles. I have a motorcycle endorsement, but I can't ride one. Also, my motorcycle insurance doesn't cover one. They are not motorcycles and need an entirely different set of skills to ride so the states are correct in requiring seperate testing and endorsements for them.

    6. Re:No by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      That is awesome.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    7. Re:No by Dishevel · · Score: 1
      Regulations state lots of things that we human beings know to be untrue.

      All motorcycle riders know that is not a motorcycle. It is in fact a 2 wheeled car. The DMV can lic it however they want though.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    8. Re:No by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      So not true.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    9. Re:No by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      A couple of questions come to mind. "How does one backup?", and "If I need to make a U-Turn, how can I?"

    10. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me - on a flooded road :-)

    11. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought that, a moment too late to actually do it, the first time I pulled up to a stop sign on a hill. I was so busy thinking about how to not stall the engine that I forgot I needed to put my feet down, and promptly fell over.

      Yep. It was my first and most embarrassing bike crash.

    12. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called a reverse gear. I hear they're popular on some forms of transportation. Dipshit.

    13. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "How does one backup?"

      Put it in reverse and step on the gas.

      "If I need to make a U-Turn, how can I?"

      Turn the steering wheel left or right and step on the gas until the vehicle has turned 180 deg.

      ...just guessing here.

    14. Re:No by camperdave · · Score: 1
      Sorry my friend, government regulations trump personal opinion.

      California Vehicle Code Section 400 and 405.

      400. (a) A "motorcycle" is a motor vehicle having a seat or saddle
      for the use of the rider, designed to travel on not more than three
      wheels in contact with the ground.

      https://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d01/vc400.htm

      405. A "motor-driven cycle" is any motorcycle with a motor that displaces less than 150 cubic centimeters.

      https://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d01/vc405.htm

      Unless the law is amended, this thing is a "motor-driven cycle" and will require an M1 license.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    15. Re:No by flargleblarg · · Score: 0

      A couple of questions come to mind. "How does one backup?", and "If I need to make a U-Turn, how can I?"

      You can't backup. Backup is a noun. Back up is a verb. The question is: "How does one back up?"

    16. Re:No by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      In Texas and Alaska, trikes are motorbikes, not cars. Oh, and in WA, you are wrong. They are motorbikes. You can't ride one because you need a sidecar endorsement to ride it. Legally, it's a motorbike with a sidecar.

      Again, every AC post I've ever seen has been 100% wrong on facts.

    17. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can back up by putting it in reverse.

      You can do a u-turn by turning the front wheel and proceeding forward slowly.

    18. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > They are motorbikes.

      If they were, then why do you not need a motorcycle endorsement? I had one before buying my motorcycle. If the trike has a steering wheel and a safety belt, then the law here is very clear, except to your kind. It went into effect on July 27, 2009. Stop your bullshit.

      > Again, every AC post I've ever seen has been 100% wrong on facts.

      And 90% of the time, you shyster registered users are liars. Adding the registration system ruined this site when you people started trying to karma whore instead of actually trying to post useful information. You people have ruined this site.

    19. Re:No by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      Sorry friend. Regulations are expressly for the purpose of regulating. What lic it requires to legally operate is of no consequence.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    20. Re:No by AK+Marc · · Score: 2
      http://www.dol.wa.gov/driversl... You are changing your definition. Trikes are motorbikes, unless they are 3-wheeled cars. You are changing your definition.

      You people have ruined this site.

      I posted the truth. You lied. Yes, I ruined the Internet by calling out a lying AC on their lying lies.

    21. Re:No by camperdave · · Score: 1

      What lic it requires to legally operate is of no consequence.

      Tell that to Ponch when he asks for your motorcycle permit.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    22. Re:No by camperdave · · Score: 2

      You can verb nouns, you know.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    23. Re:No by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      stick a floppy disk in the drive and press "backup"

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    24. Re:No by worf_mo · · Score: 2

      Reminds me of a good friend of mine who after an evening spent binge drinking got on his bicycle, put both feet on the pedals (without pedaling) and tried to turn the grip on the right handlebar, thinking he was on a motorbike. At that point gravity took over and ended the show.

    25. Re:No by Ingcuervo · · Score: 0

      You can verb nouns, you know.

      Obligatory c&h:
      http://www.languagetrainers.co...

    26. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, care to bring out a source for your claim that this isn't a motorcycle?
      Can't really take it at face value on the internet.

    27. Re:No by k8to · · Score: 0

      Take that overshoot to 11!

      --
      -josh
    28. Re:No by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      Ride a motorcycle, or ask someone who has. They can tell you.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    29. Re:No by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      Since it does not have a motor with _any_ displacement, wouldn't it be closer to a motorized bicycle? At least that mentions electric drive.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    30. Re:No by RavenLrD20k · · Score: 1

      The simple vernacular that bikers use. Despite what gov't regulations designate as a Motorcycle vs. Car, bikers will call a vehicle based on certain characteristics. To give you an eye opening look into our world:

      Scooter / Scoot: Two wheeled vehicle denoted by having an open space in front of the seat where the driver's legs can move freely. Controlled by handle bars. Exposed to elements.

      Motorcycle / Bike: Two wheeled vehicle that the driver would have to straddle and feet are fixed on either pegs or runners without much freedom of movement. Controlled by handle bars. Exposed to elements.

      Trike: Three wheeled vehicle that typically must be straddled in a similar fashion to bikes. Controlled by handle bars. Exposed to elements.

      Cage: Four or more wheeled vehicle with an open floorboard in front of the seat. Controlled by steering wheel. Shielded from elements, often temperature controlled.

      Semi: 18 wheeled vehicle (Four wheels per weight bearing axle, plus two directional wheels) with similar seating to a cage. Controlled by steering wheel. Shielded from elements and temperature controlled. Give a wide berth lest you want to be road pizza.

      This Thing: 2 wheeled cage that thinks it wants to be a bike but with the amenities of a car. Controlled by steering wheel. Protected from the elements. If you show up to a 1%'er (Biker Gang) rally in one of these, expect vandalism/bodily harm. If you show up to a non-1% rally in one of these, expect to be laughed at and made the butt of jokes for the duration of the rally, whether or not you stay there.

    31. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dumshit - govt definitions of terms are for the purpose of govt regulation.

      We dont all have to consider trikes to be motorcycles merely because a govt agency classifies them that way. The govt does not define our terms for us - if the govt uses a different term than is in common use, then it is obviously the govt that is in error.

    32. Re:No by Altus · · Score: 1

      to be fair, if its a stop sign with nobody else there, I like to try to keep my feet up and stay balanced for a 2 count before continuing on.... if you can do it you look badass... if you fuck up and have to throw a foot down suddenly you look like an idiot :-)

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    33. Re:No by camperdave · · Score: 1

      To some, it isn't a motorcycle unless it has a Harley Davidson logo on it, and makes a deep throated BrapBrapBrap noise. Doesn't make it so.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    34. Re:No by Altus · · Score: 1

      Is there actually a separate endorsement for them? What about those weird ass spiders with the 2 wheels in front, from what I have seen those ride more like a motorcycle than a traditional trike.

      I had no idea any states did this... It does make sense... some skills translate but others habits might get you killed. Still, it must be a pain for older riders who just want to move to a trike for ease and comfort when they find out they need a new license.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    35. Re:No by Dishevel · · Score: 1
      Practicing to become a trials rider?

      No I get it. I loved to screw around and see what I could do on my bike. Though I never found putting my foot down to be onerous. Nor do I believe that a fully enclosed car that happens to have two of its wheels missing and has the benefit of needing a license that you also need for an actual motorcycle is in fact a motorcycle.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    36. Re:No by Altus · · Score: 1

      I would rather they called it a car.... I don't want more people with motorcycle endorsements with no actual ability to ride a bike that is not this one.

      Sure, you might have had to take the test or course on a "real" bike but it takes a lot more hours than that to become competent at riding.

      For the company, they really want to be a car, the motorcycle test is quite difficult and the rider education course is expensive... they would be much better off if anyone with a car license could drive this... which is how it should be if it basically acts like a car.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    37. Re:No by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Since it does not have a motor with _any_ displacement, wouldn't it be closer to a motorized bicycle? At least that mentions electric drive.

      I'd say no. First, the definition for motorized bicycle specifies top speeds which this device handily outpaces. Second, the definition for motor driven cycle specifies that the engine displacement be less than 150cc. Zero is less that 150.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    38. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try telling that to Officer Friendly when he pulls you over for not wearing a helmet.

    39. Re: No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neat concept. In my state, the DMV decides, not a local biker club.

    40. Re: No by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      In your state the DMV decides what regulation set a thing falls under.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    41. Re:No by johanwanderer · · Score: 1

      You do it in the same way everyone else who rides motorcycles do, with a tight turn :) and get out and push it back when you need to.

    42. Re:No by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      I love laws that are written that way. The state of Virginia automobile inspection laws are equally as circumspect. They say things like 'Door handles must be operable from inside the car.' That does not mean that there have to be door handles installed, just that they have to be operable from inside if they exist.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    43. Re:No by RavenLrD20k · · Score: 1

      Actually, unless you are dealing with someone who's over-the-top ignorant, even the die-hard Harley fans will acknowledge other cycle brands. At worst this just leads into sub-classing of the Motorcycle / Biker group. If I showed up to a 1% rally (not bloody likely in the first place) on my Venture, I can expect that it would probably wind up vandalized, but so long as I showed proper "respect" to the members of the head MC, no harm would necessarily come to me personally.

      There's also the other bit. It doesn't matter the style or brand you're loyal to or what you say about riders of other brands/styles, if you're riding an open 2 or 3 wheeler, be it scoot, bike, or trike, you're part of the biggest club on the road. You'll be acknowledged by other riders on the road and it's courtesy to acknowledge other riders in kind. If you come onto a road behind a squad of bikes, regardless of your ride, members of the squad will signal of road hazards to you as they see them; and you're free to part ways at any point and you're likely to be waved off in a measure of good wishes.

    44. Re:No by Altus · · Score: 1

      Certainly not a chore to put your feet down at a stop light.

      I can see a use for this, although it would be a shame if it needed a motorcycle license. I can't see why it should. You don't push to turn, you dontt put your feet down, you don't back it up manually.... what about it requires any of the skills I learned in the rider ed course?

      I mean I would never take one of these to bike week, but as a small commuter vehicle for city living it might not be a bad thing.... though maybe not around here. How well will it handle snow and ice?

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

  3. Got it... by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1, Funny

    Hipster Mobile for the Glasshole crowd.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:Got it... by Shortguy881 · · Score: 1

      Doesn't change how ugly that car/motorcycle/whatever is.

      --
      Brilliance without wisdom, power without conscience. Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants.
    2. Re:Got it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's sort of a motorcycle, for the low low price of more than a car. Seriously, my car cost less, my bike cost nearly a quarter of what they want to charge for this. And it's got a slower top speed than either of my vehicles. I will admit at least though that 200 mile range is about on par for a motorcycle, but I can refill my bike in about 2 minutes, and usually a day out riding for fun involves a tank and a half of gas. Might be a bit of an issue.

      And really, electric sort of doesn't make sense for bikes since electric really isn't any quicker, and my bike already gets like 60mpg. with a retail cost of 24K, cost of insurance completely nullifies any fuel cost savings. My bike was 7K and costs me 80 bucks a year to insure, how much is this thing going to cost to insure.

    3. Re:Got it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      History in the Making Harley davidson finally make an efficient engine!

    4. Re:Got it... by omnichad · · Score: 1

      They'll still have to figure out something to add to it to make it obnoxiously loud.

  4. Why? by khb · · Score: 2

    The gyos add complexity, and dropping a third wheel doesn't save that much space. See Riley's classic http://www.amazon.com/Alternat... or just search for some of his existing designs.

    As a previous owner of a Sparrow, I wish these guys luck. Unfortunately, I need a three seater ...my trusty (actual) motorcycle sits idle since I've too often got to worry about hauling two kids these days.

    1. Re:Why? by FridayBob · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The gyos add complexity, and dropping a third wheel doesn't save that much space. ...

      You must be thinking of something like the Peraves MonoTracer, but my impression of it is that it takes some getting used to. The C-1 will be much, much easier to deal with (not to mention better looking). As for the added complexity, the gyos make it easier to drive and don't make it prohibitively expensive ($24k, v. $104k for the monotracer), so who cares? As long as it works.

    2. Re:Why? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 2

      The gyos add complexity, and dropping a third wheel doesn't save that much space.

      The gyro might add more stability than a third wheel.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    3. Re:Why? by rolfwind · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Reminds me of the Carver and the Venture One:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C...
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      But those tilted with the turn, I wonder how it feels taking a turn when the gyros want to keep this thing upright?

    4. Re:Why? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      The gyos add complexity, and dropping a third wheel doesn't save that much space.

      The gyro might add more stability than a third wheel.

      It almost certainly does. Three-wheelers are notoriously unstable.

    5. Re:Why? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      I have a 2008 Piaggio MP3-500 in my stable of bikes. And it's as stable as any other bike I have (Honda CTX700, Suzuki V-Strom 650). Three wheels, as stable - or unstable, when you're stopped - as any other motorcycle.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    6. Re:Why? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Three wheels, as stable - or unstable, when you're stopped - as any other motorcycle.

      And the gyro bike could well be - arguably - more stable again. It's certainly much more stable than any other two-wheeler when stationary.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    7. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was expecting that link to point to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reliant_Robin

    8. Re:Why? by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

      The gyros are under computer control, and the vehicle leans into turns as you would expect a motorcycle to.

    9. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dummy thinks that 2-wheels is the epitome of stability.

    10. Re:Why? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      It could... I am curious what it would do the cornering/leaning of the bike under power.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  5. Tigerblood. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flash video? Seriously? Slashdot continues its slide into irrelevance.

    1. Re:Tigerblood. by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      Sad as it may be, I think websites that lack flash videos are the ones sliding into irrelevance. Forget using words to convey an idea - even still images are passé - if it can be said it can be shown in a video or animated gif. At least that's how it feels on 90% of the web.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    2. Re:Tigerblood. by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

      lack flash

      Seriously? Flash is dying if not already dead. HTML5 supports video, so every site potentially has video.

    3. Re:Tigerblood. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Their point was that websites that lack videos are sliding into irrelevance - nothing to do with which technology is used. I much prefer skimmable text over a video and agree with them.

  6. Guaranteed Death by Teckla · · Score: 0

    Guaranteed death in a car accident -- what's not to love?

    1. Re:Guaranteed Death by Jeremi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Guaranteed death in a car accident -- what's not to love?

      That doesn't stop all the motorcyclists and bicyclists out there; they have even less protection than this offers.

      Plus in this you don't have to wear stifling leather clothing, and you can drive in the rain without getting soaked.

      I think there is a market for this.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    2. Re:Guaranteed Death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the appeal behind motorcycles is gotta go fast, the wind in your hair, and being able to squeeze through tight spots, this abomination does none of these.

    3. Re:Guaranteed Death by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 1

      That only applies to states that allow both lane splitting and don't have helmet laws. I'm not even sure if California applies.

    4. Re:Guaranteed Death by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

      The leather is half the fun, baby.

    5. Re:Guaranteed Death by volkerdi · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and don't forget that "loud pipes save lives" around typical inattentive drivers. This thing is silent but deadly.

    6. Re:Guaranteed Death by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      And the stifling leather clothing.

    7. Re:Guaranteed Death by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      I'll give up wind in my hair to avoid gravel in my scalp but goddamn, more places need to allow lane splitting.

    8. Re:Guaranteed Death by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      Plus in this you don't have to wear stifling leather clothing, and you can drive in the rain without getting soaked.

      I think there is a market for this.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smart_(automobile)

      And it doesn't require touchy gyros, can fit a passenger, and a little bit of cargo.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    9. Re:Guaranteed Death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As a 30+ year motorcyclist, "loud pipes save lives" is, IMHO, crap. Most impacts come from the front, where the sound is naturally less. Being a defensive rider saves lives, helmets save lives, being an asshole with a straight pipe not so much. And you'll note that often the "loud pipes save lives" proponents are also of the opinion that "helmet laws suck".

    10. Re:Guaranteed Death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't have to be legal for it to be done. Lane split on a highway that is a parking lot, nobody will be able to pull you over until the city gets a traffic enforcement system similar to the one in Ringworld that sucks you and your vehicle into the county jail.

      I personally don't do this, but it is quite common for motorcyclists to do this, as well as ride the breakdown lane for miles and miles.

    11. Re:Guaranteed Death by FridayBob · · Score: 2

      Guaranteed death in a car accident -- what's not to love?

      That's an unfair comparison. You're thinking of it as a very, very small car, which in the case of a collision involving almost any four-wheeled vehicle can never offer its occupants an equal chance of emerging unscathed (the reason why a friend of mine always preferred that his wife drive a Cadillac). Instead, think of the C-1 as a greener, much safer and more comfortable version of a motorcycle that also has a cost per mile of 0.6 cents.

    12. Re:Guaranteed Death by houstonbofh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      the appeal behind motorcycles is gotta go fast

      There are 200,000 Harley buyers a year that disagree with you.

    13. Re:Guaranteed Death by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Guaranteed death in a car accident -- what's not to love?

      Three major wrecks while riding a motorcycle. I still ride, and I am apparently alive as well. However, if you have have figured out a way to get out of this life without dieing, I am all ears!

    14. Re:Guaranteed Death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that if everyone just drove smaller vehicles everyone would be safer in aggregate...

    15. Re:Guaranteed Death by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      No. It's dangerous both to the rider and everyone around them.

      Don't be so impatient.

      OR...

      Get a dual-sport/enduro bike. That way you can go off-road and not put the safety of other motorists at risk.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    16. Re:Guaranteed Death by MrChips · · Score: 2, Interesting

      According to these stats for Canada in 2009, car drivers suffered about 1173 deaths and 5393 serious injuries while among motorcyclists there were 194 deaths and 1271 serious injuries. If you add these up and look at the percentage chance of death if involved in a collision severe enough for serious injuries than you'll see an 18% chance of death for the car drivers and 13% for the motorcyclists.

      Care to share your source for "guaranteed death"?

    17. Re:Guaranteed Death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But then again, in this you ride much closer to the ground than a normal bike, still has no crush zones, and has you inside a little deathtrap that can crush in and leave you, well, trapped. Being thrown off a bike is probably safer when wearing your protective gear.

      Those two little airbags won't do much. Hell, they'd be better off putting in some outward facing airbags up front to provide a sort of crush zone for the whole vehicle.

    18. Re:Guaranteed Death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's illegal here. Some idiot biker tried to do it between me and another car and was almost killed. On accident, of course. How did I know he was about to get that close to my car?

      Little fucking shit flipped me off. I hate motorcycles on the road. You all need to go get fucked. You're loud, obnoxious, and reckless.

    19. Re:Guaranteed Death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Well, you fucking stupid little faggot: That's because people are thrown from motorcycles. Do you see that thing in the video? That's a fucking deathtrap. Can you imagine how the dynamics of a crash would be different in that thing vs a motorcycle vs a car? Think about crumple zones and momentum effects.

      God damn, are you this stupid in real life?

    20. Re:Guaranteed Death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Let's be honest here. Would you like to compare % death rates for MILES TRAVELED instead? I'm a motorcyclist. It's dangerous out there. And how long is the riding season in most of Canada, 5 months?

      It's not guaranteed death by any means. But it's dangerous.

    21. Re:Guaranteed Death by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      That only applies to states that allow both lane splitting and don't have helmet laws. I'm not even sure if California applies.

      You are correct. CA is the only State that allows lane sharing (splitting - but the CHP prefers sharing), and it requires helmets. All other States - including the no-helmet ones - ban lane splitting.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    22. Re:Guaranteed Death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You have made a false claim because you are terrible at statistics. Deaths divided by serious injuries is a nonsensical metric.

      Hint: Go find the total miles driven in cars and motorcycles.

    23. Re:Guaranteed Death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stand in a traffic jam with proper protective gear in summer temperatures, and you will know your engine or yourself is going to die from heat exhaustion.

      Riding is very dangerous, filtering even more so, but I fail to see the risk for anyone else but the rider.

      In countries where people are not so self-centered as in the US, drivers actually pay attention to their surroundings and have learned that motorcycles are going to come in-between lanes, no matter what the actual vehicle code is.

      Sometimes, there are people who block me on purpose, that is very childish, but the worse are people who actually swerve into me when I pass. These, in addition to all the distracted cell phone users, are the reasons why filtering is dangerous as seen from my saddle.

    24. Re:Guaranteed Death by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      You are wrong. You can find out for yourself if you care to do so.

    25. Re:Guaranteed Death by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      And you're such a treasure.

    26. Re:Guaranteed Death by Arker · · Score: 1, Troll

      "Deaths divided by serious injuries is a nonsensical metric."

      No metric can really be nonsensical in and of itself, what's nonsensical is to use a metric that does not relate to the context.

      In this case,  the context has to do with a claim of 'guaranteed death' in an accident with a car. So deaths divided by serious injuries actually doesnt look like nonsense. It's a proxy for 'deaths vs non-fatal outcomes in accidents with cars.' Which does not appear to be immediately available.

      "Hint: Go find the total miles driven in cars and motorcycles."

      That would be a better metric of generalised safety, but it seems to have little relevance to the claim of 'guaranteed death.'

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    27. Re:Guaranteed Death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like how this is modded insightful instead of funny.

    28. Re:Guaranteed Death by RavenLrD20k · · Score: 1

      Get Mesh Armor with padding for the summer. It's just as protective and a lot cooler since it lets the air pass through almost as well as if you weren't wearing it.

    29. Re:Guaranteed Death by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      It's dangerous both to the rider and everyone around them.

      It seems to work in most of the rest of the world.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    30. Re:Guaranteed Death by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Loud pipes annoy everyone - even people who are inside their homes a half mile a way. There is no good excuse for THAT much noise pollution.

    31. Re:Guaranteed Death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am an experienced rider. I think a statistic you are missing is that most motorcycle accidents are single vehicle accidents by inexperienced drivers.

      The fact that tons of people slip on pea gravel and break their wrist/pinky doesn't mean motorcycles are more safe in a collision with another vehicle or stationary object which is what almost all injury car accidents are.

    32. Re:Guaranteed Death by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      That's actually what I have. Though it does have leather on the sleeves.

  7. Not as original as they claim by dorzak · · Score: 2

    They are not as original as they claim. There was a similar concept in kit car magazines in the 90's. There is a Youtube video (Yes, it is Flash but so is the video on the story)- https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    1. Re:Not as original as they claim by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      But but... It's not "electric" so it uses like energy and stuff!

    2. Re:Not as original as they claim by FridayBob · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They are not as original as they claim. There was a similar concept in kit car magazines in the 90's. There is a Youtube video (Yes, it is Flash but so is the video on the story)- https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      Yes, and over 30 years before that there was the Ford Gyron, which was much more like a car, and even it was not original. However, nothing like that has ever made it into production. If the C-1 does, it'll be the first gyroscopically stabilized vehicle ever to make it to market. And I figure it has a good chance of success, because $24k is hardly unaffordable.

    3. Re:Not as original as they claim by mujadaddy · · Score: 1

      There is a Youtube video (Yes, it is Flash

      It's 2014. You can disable your Flash plugin and it plays just fine.

      --
      Populus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur...
      "Force shits upon Reason's back." - Poor Richard's Almanac
    4. Re:Not as original as they claim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is also the Peraves Monotracer, as in an enclosed motorcycle with landing wheels.

    5. Re:Not as original as they claim by rolfwind · · Score: 5, Interesting
    6. Re:Not as original as they claim by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1
      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    7. Re:Not as original as they claim by Khazunga · · Score: 1

      (...)because $24k is hardly unaffordable.

      It's not unaffordable. It's uncompetitive. A Dacia Sandero costs $9k, runs on LPG, transports 4 plus luggage. $16k covers a lot of cost for the fuel price difference, and you get a lot more use cases out of the vehicle.

      --
      If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you
    8. Re:Not as original as they claim by FridayBob · · Score: 1

      (...)because $24k is hardly unaffordable.

      It's not unaffordable. It's uncompetitive. A Dacia Sandero costs $9k, runs on LPG, transports 4 plus luggage. $16k covers a lot of cost for the fuel price difference, and you get a lot more use cases out of the vehicle.

      The Lit C-1 doesn't compete head-to-head with cheap cars, like the Dacia Sandero. Yes, the Sandero has all of those advantages over the C-1, but cars like that are much more expensive to own in the longer term, will never be as environmentally friendly, are less agile in traffic, probably less fun to drive and certainly don't look as nice. Those are also the reasons (in descending order) that I would have for buying a C-1.

      Perhaps I should also mention that I live in the Netherlands where the gas price is currently about $9.00 a gallon (the highest in the world, mostly due to excise tax) and commuters tend to spend a lot of their time stuck in traffic -- another reason why I find the C-1 so appealing. Also, the Dutch government has extra taxes for people with cars than run on diesel and LPG, so cars that burn those fuels only makes sense for people who expect high mileage.

  8. My next car by greg_barton · · Score: 1

    I don't need a new car, and probably won't for a few years. But this will be my next car when I'm ready to buy one.

  9. So it's a gyrocar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gyrocars are nothing new. The design is about 100 years old. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gyrocar What makes this one so special and why do they think this gyrocar will succeed where others have failed?

    1. Re:So it's a gyrocar? by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 1

      Computers.

    2. Re:So it's a gyrocar? by Richy_T · · Score: 2

      Cup holders.

    3. Re:So it's a gyrocar? by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Hipsters.

    4. Re:So it's a gyrocar? by FridayBob · · Score: 2

      Gyrocars are nothing new. ... What makes this one so special and why do they think this gyrocar will succeed where others have failed?

      Thanks to the fact that the C-1 is electric and makes use of modern computer technology, it's simpler, lighter and cheaper to produce than its conceptual predecessors and has the potential to be much more reliable. Oh, and a gyrocar in production... that would be something new.

  10. Video has no action by rsborg · · Score: 1

    I wish I didn't wait through the advert just to hear the guy speak. What's the point of a video of a vehicle that's not moving?

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  11. Déjà vu? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

    I think I've seen that design somewhere before, but I can't remember where/when.

    1. Re:Déjà vu? by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure Cousin It drove one in the Adam's Family movie.

    2. Re:Déjà vu? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Top Gear. Can't remember if it was the Carver or the EcoBike, but that's where I saw it.

      Hard to forget the image of Jeremy Clarkson stuffing himself in that tiny, tiny back seat...

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    3. Re:Déjà vu? by Snard · · Score: 2

      Are you remembering this?

      http://cobbsblog.com/gyro/gyro...

      (I remember reading that Science & Mechanics article in the day.)

      --
      - Mike
    4. Re:Déjà vu? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      I forgot about that one, but no that's not it. The one I remember was nearly identical in design.

  12. Suspension? by jeti · · Score: 1

    The wheels are very close to the chassis. I wonder whether the vehicle has any suspension at all.

    1. Re:Suspension? by FridayBob · · Score: 1

      The wheels are very close to the chassis. I wonder whether the vehicle has any suspension at all.

      Yeah, I saw that too. But, remember that the one in the video is only a prototype. I have little doubt that any production version will have more suspension travel. For example, I suspect that the latter will have slightly smaller wheels.

  13. Self-balancing -- finally! by fisted · · Score: 2

    Everyone who ever rode a motorcycle knows very well they those things already self-balance to an impressive degree. Even if you wanted, you couldn't make one simply fall over (short of giving the handlebar a huge jerk)

    1. Re:Self-balancing -- finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This stays up at stops. Big difference, though I don't see putting my feet down at a stop as a hardship. Riding this thing won't be any exercise like a real motorcycle is either.

    2. Re:Self-balancing -- finally! by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2

      This is incredible, really: motorcycles are much easier to balance at higher speeds. They made the most difficult part of riding a bike trivial.

      I'm curious how much mass they had to add to the bike to make it self-balance like that, and how well it balance with a 200lb rider (driver? I guess it'd be driver, since it's got a cage). And on corners, as well - presumably the gyros/inclinometer or whatever feeds the steering data.

      I want one of these without the cage and a gas motor, personally. 50mpg+ for a road trip would not be bad: 200 miles on a run is not good. 200 miles is almost tethered.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    3. Re:Self-balancing -- finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought a huge jerk came standard with machine

  14. I prefer more tires for more contact with the road by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    I like it when my brakes stop me before I slide into something.
    (I ride a motorcycle, I find riding in the rain to be unpleasant for a variety of reasons)

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  15. This is Awesome by marcgvky · · Score: 1

    Does it come with air conditioning? Wonder if you could have a two-seater?

    1. Re:This is Awesome by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      It is a two-seater, if you can bring yourself to call that tiny bit of fabric in the back a "seat."

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    2. Re:This is Awesome by FridayBob · · Score: 1

      Does it come with air conditioning? Wonder if you could have a two-seater?

      See this FAQ. I was told a while back that the C-1 will also include air-conditioning, cruise-control, and even a head-up display (HUD), but I wonder how much of that will make it into the final production version. However, they also wanted to make many of its parts upgradeable, so perhaps it will be possible to add some of those bells and whistles later on. It will be possible to take a passenger, but they say you will only want to do that for relatively short distances (whether this is due to excessive battery drain or discomfort, I don't know).

    3. Re:This is Awesome by camperdave · · Score: 1

      It is a two-seater, if you can bring yourself to call that tiny bit of fabric in the back a "seat."

      To be honest, I'm more concerned about the seating arrangement, than the seat.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  16. self balancing when stopped by Chirs · · Score: 2

    The key to this one is that you don't need to put feet down when stopped, so it can be recumbant and fully-enclosed.

    1. Re:self balancing when stopped by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 1

      Motorcycles typically have very sticky tires that allow them to stop much faster than nearly any car. The downside is that they rarely last even 10,000 miles.

    2. Re:self balancing when stopped by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 1

      Damn. Replied to the wrong post.

      On a side note, the video mentions the final version will be drive-by-wire. In theory, such a vehicle could be fully automated, like those google cars.

    3. Re:self balancing when stopped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Motorcycles typically have very sticky tires that allow them to stop much faster than nearly any car. The downside is that they rarely last even 10,000 miles.

      physical fail. hint: it ain't the "sticky tires" that allow motorcycles to stop in shorter distances than cars.

    4. Re:self balancing when stopped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Motorcycle tires typically have a negligible contact patch to the road compared to cars and have a requirement of lasting a bit longer than 10000 miles. It is not at all typical for road motorcycles to use sticky race tires for daily road use.

  17. Falls over when it runs out of juice? by wile_e_wonka · · Score: 1

    So, if you take the thing to its limits, you'd better remember to get out before the battery completely dies. Because when the gyro stops turning, you can't put your feet down (since there is a vehicle body in the way) to keep the thing from falling over.

    Not that I think the idea is a bad one in general.

    I saw a Kickstarter campaign just the other day using this concept to replace training wheels in kids' bikes (a gyro goes in the front wheel). Personally, I think it was a better idea in the kids' bike than on a motorbike. And that Kickstarter video had actual footage of the concept in action, with kids riding bikes, and a shot of the bike rolling with no one on it and self correcting when somebody smacked it several times in a manner that would normally knock a bike over).

    1. Re:Falls over when it runs out of juice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure it's trivial to design a kickstand that automatically deploys once the gyros drop below a certain speed. If not, then it's certainly easy enough to design a system that detects imminent battery depletion and deploys the kickstand.

      dom

    2. Re:Falls over when it runs out of juice? by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      If you run out of battery juice the vehicle is likely to stop moving forward long before the gyro's spin down all the way. Besides which it would be trivially easy for them to implement a kill switch for motor power at some low battery level to make sure you still had enough power for control mechanisms and such.

  18. Once the electronics are miniaturized by tepples · · Score: 2

    Wonder if you could have a two-seater?

    Yes. The video shows a prototype with a rack of control circuitry behind the driver's seat, but near the end he mentions how they've miniaturized the circuitry enough since this prototype was built to replace it with a second seat.

  19. This is dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't want to be in a vehicle that has a large high speed gyro directly underneath my ass.

    1. Re:This is dangerous by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      AC refuses to ride motorbike because it's dangerous! Stop the presses!

  20. Re:I prefer more tires for more contact with the r by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 1

    I also ride a motorcycle, and I agree that riding in the rain on downhills or over those metal construction plates can be very harrowing. Maybe the gyros will help with that to some extent.

  21. Re:I prefer more tires for more contact with the r by Richy_T · · Score: 1

    Riding in the raid is a state of mind. It helps if you have a warm shower and dry towels at the end of your ride.

    If it's cold or torrential, that's a different story.

  22. Re:I prefer more tires for more contact with the r by Richy_T · · Score: 1

    raid->rain

  23. Re:I prefer more tires for more contact with the r by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I like it when my brakes stop me before I slide into something.
    (I ride a motorcycle, I find riding in the rain to be unpleasant for a variety of reasons)

    I like to learn physics and see that the number of wheels has nothing to do with it.
    http://easycalculation.com/physics/classical-physics/learn-static-friction.php

  24. wow....200 whole orders??? by tekrat · · Score: 3, Interesting

    200 pre orders?? Screw that. The Elio has 20,000 pre-orders, and it's not built yet, has a nice low (projected) cost of $6800 and gets 84mpg. And I'd much rather have the Elio than the C-1 (although for a brief moment, I considered the C-1)... But for the long range I need, the Elio fits my requirements better.
    http://www.eliomotors.com/

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:wow....200 whole orders??? by citizenr · · Score: 3, Informative

      they all have same thing in common - they dont exist, but take preorders

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    2. Re:wow....200 whole orders??? by FridayBob · · Score: 1

      200 pre orders?? Screw that. The Elio has 20,000 pre-orders, and it's not built yet, has a nice low (projected) cost of $6800 and gets 84mpg. And I'd much rather have the Elio than the C-1 (although for a brief moment, I considered the C-1)... But for the long range I need, the Elio fits my requirements better. http://www.eliomotors.com/

      An interesting concept, and at less than a 3rd of the price of a C-1 I can see why this is a popular idea. However, the Elio is still a gasoline-driven vehicle and even if it were possible to get 85 MPG all the time, that would not even be twice as efficient as my old Honda Civic and nowhere near as efficient as will be possible with the C-1 (0.6 cents per mile). In fact, the C-1 is so much more efficient, that here in the Netherlands it could mean saving the cost difference between an Elio and a C-1 within four years (note, however, that in the Netherlands gasoline currently sells for about $9.00 a gallon -- the highest price in the world). The C-1's 200-mile range-limit may make it an unacceptable option for you today, but battery technology has come a long way and performance is only getting better. And I've been told that battery upgrades for the C-1 will be possible.

    3. Re:wow....200 whole orders??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The one people tend to forget about is insurance. Insurance on a $7000 motorcycle is dirt cheap. Especially if you go with only liability coverage. This thing costs a lot, and the insurance price will undoubtedly reflect that. To overcome the cost of dirt cheap insurance, I think it'd actually have to pay you for every mile you drove it.

    4. Re:wow....200 whole orders??? by pepty · · Score: 1

      Insurance on a $7000 motorcycle is dirt cheap. Especially if you go with only liability coverage.

      Short term and long term disability insurance on the other hand are not cheap, but should be considered unless you are planning on bankrupting your family after a crash.

    5. Re:wow....200 whole orders??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every time I see the Elio, I wonder how many pedestrians and curbs those outrigger wheels will run into.

  25. Turns? by godel_56 · · Score: 1

    I haven't looked at the Slashdot video, but on YouTube there's no sign of it turning corners. What effect will the gyros have on that?

    1. Re:Turns? by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      I thought about that too but I bet that they slow the gyros as the vehicle speed increases.

    2. Re:Turns? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can probably use the gyros to activate the lean to the precise angle desired to optimize cornering ability. They could even use them to correct in the event of a low-side or high-side starting up.

    3. Re:Turns? by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      It'd have no effect. The gyro could be precessed to help turning, but it would only have a minor effect on the lean, and none on the turn. This isn't the first gyro-stabilized motorbike.

  26. akira by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Sure this isn't quite a motorcycle or a car but its been long known that any propulsion system is more effective for two wheels vs four. The crux of the electric market is limited range but for a motorcycle ypy generally operate in a limited range anyway to cruise to work or leisure. This seems to be the best suit for electric currently from a use vs cost aspect.

    1. Re:akira by RavenLrD20k · · Score: 1

      When my weekend leisure trips can easily run 400-1000+ miles one way, stopping for 2-8 hrs every 180-195 miles to charge up instead of 5-15 minutes every 165-180 miles is unacceptable.

  27. 1 year later by maliqua · · Score: 1

    and its still neither a motor cycle nor a car

    slashdot your number one source to find out what was new and cool last year

  28. whatever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yeah, and don't forget that "loud pipes save lives" around typical inattentive drivers. This thing is silent but deadly.

    A coworker of mine thought that.

    He was STILL clobbered because of a dingbat driving her well sound insulated white SUV - and drove off; never to be caught for hit and run.

    He's pretty screwed up but can still program.

    As for me, walking on the side fo the road to have some narcissistic assholes cruising along at 10MPH - twisting their throttle - VROOM! VROOM! VROOM! - with their fat guts and gray hair hanging out of their over priced leather outfits, just has me putting my fingers in my ears, shaking my head and feeling sorry for such losers who have nothing better in their lives than to spend too much money on crap and live a delusion that they are "born to be wild" on weekends and have to go to their souless corporate drone lives on Monday.

  29. 2 wheels allows them to avoid a tonne of regs by Marrow · · Score: 2

    4 wheels is a car. Cars have a metric shit-load of regulations associated with production, testing, warranty. Many of these are specific barriers to entry to prevent new car companies from entering the market.
    2 wheels allows them to avoid all that and build something that is ultra-light and efficient and can be brought to market. Bravo for them.

    1. Re:2 wheels allows them to avoid a tonne of regs by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Except 2 wheels classifies them as motorcycles, so only a small percentage of the driving public is licensed to drive them. And there are other issues, like requiring a helmet.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  30. Re:I prefer more tires for more contact with the r by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess you didn't get to the next chapter on kinetic friction? http://easycalculation.com/phy...
    Once I have to worry about static frication I've already spun out of control.

    And that the coefficient of friction(mu_k) of a four wheeled car is different than a two wheel motorcycle.

    Of course what is also really nice is a high coefficient of traction, so you don't slide out of a flat curve (non-banked). But because traction does depend on loaded weight, having extra tires is of a huge benefit.

  31. smoke and mirrors by AndyKron · · Score: 2

    It's all smoke and mirrors like the VentureOne, and the Moller Skycar.

  32. Re:Trikes by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 1

    I used to hate trikes too, but like you say, they are the only way for a lot of older people and people with injuries to enjoy riding. Now I appreciate the vehicles for what they are.

  33. Re: I have to put my feet down again! by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 1

    To be fair, motorcycles have a rider in a standing position. I wouldn't look forward to trying to balance that thing from that reclined position with any kind of cross-wind.

  34. No vroom vroom sound either? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this article targeted at 4 year olds?

  35. How about a BICYCLE with this tech? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The gyro would be a flywheel to store some of the power of downhills and flat pedaling, to be expended as a booster on uphills. And because a storage flywheel of this kind would at most times be at maximum speed at signals and stops on the flat, cyclists would no longer have an excuse to not follow traffic controls. Your feet could remain firmly in the pedal clips when you stop at the Stop sign.

    1. Re:How about a BICYCLE with this tech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get to bottom of hill... Can't turn! AAAAHHhhhhhHH!!!!! CRASH!!!!!

    2. Re:How about a BICYCLE with this tech? by WillAdams · · Score: 1

      The problem is that there isn't that much energy to harvest --- look at some of the electric conversions --- every one which I've seen which has considered regenerative energy has rejected it 'cause it doesn't make up for the added weight.

      --
      Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
  36. Re: I have to put my feet down again! by Xiph1980 · · Score: 1

    If you're balancing your motorcycle by only shifting your weight around, you're doing something wrong.
    It's actually not even possible to do that, because if you shift your body to the left, the motorcycle will tilt to the right and the center of mass will be on the exact same vertical line as it was before, exactly above the wheels. You balance by steering. If you get a crosswind from the left, you'll steer to the right slightly, moving the center of mass a tad to the right, but the point of contact with the ground even moreso. That way your motorcycle (and you with it) will lean a bit to the left counteracting the crosswind. This works exactly thesame on any two-wheeler like a motorcycle, scooter or a reclining motorcycle. You intuitively do thesame while steering. You don't steer the motorcycle left to go left. You steer it right, resulting in a controlled tilt to the left which you compensate by going round a bend. And knowing this can help you when you end up in a tight spot when you underestimated a bend. If you threaten to go off in a bend, pull the handlebar on the "wrong" side of the steeringwheel. This'll jolt you even flatter, and you will very likely make it through unscathed.

    --
    Manuals are your last resort only
  37. Nice grey text on a grey background by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How original. And how difficult to read for partially sighted users.

  38. Re:I prefer more tires for more contact with the r by FridayBob · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I like it when my brakes stop me before I slide into something.

    Motorcycles are actually better at stopping than most cars. Ever heard of a stopee?

    (I ride a motorcycle, I find riding in the rain to be unpleasant for a variety of reasons)

    Yes, because if you manage to get your motorcycle's front wheel to slide, it usually means you fall will over. But, that's exactly one of the reasons why the C-1 is so cool: it's gyroscopically stabilized, so if it slides for whatever reason it won't fall over. In that respect it will behave much like a car.

  39. Close, so close. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Revamp it to the form factor of a TRON lightcycle and, my friends, we have a winner.

  40. Re: I have to put my feet down again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're describing the effects of gyroscopic precession, not the results of weight shifting. How long have you been riding?

  41. Re: I have to put my feet down again! by Dishevel · · Score: 1
    Umm. No.

    What is going on with the "Strange" way a motorcycle steers is gyroscopic precession.

    That big spinning wheel in the front of the motorcycle is acting as a gyroscope.

    --
    Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
  42. and countersteering by ProfBooty · · Score: 2

    Don't forget countersteering too!

    --
    Bring back the old version of slashdot.
  43. Re: I have to put my feet down again! by Xiph1980 · · Score: 1

    I could've gone into details about centrepetal forces and gyroscopic precession, but I chose not to, because it's not important from a rider's stance. Interesting from a phycisist's stance perhaps, but when riding, what matters is what forcefully steering or weight-shifting does to your bike, and to rest DocSavage64109's concerns about balance in crosswinds with a reclining motorcycle.

    Also, the gyroscopic precession effect plays a large part with big wheeled motorcycles, but plays little to no part on motorscooters and other small wheeled two-wheelers, and this device has very little wheels so I doubt it has any noticeable effect.

    --
    Manuals are your last resort only
  44. Re:I prefer more tires for more contact with the r by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Riding in the raid is a state of mind.

    Maybe if you're raiding a fishing village. If you're raiding a castle, you need a hell of a lot more than a warm shower and dry towels at the end.

  45. huh? by TheCarp · · Score: 2

    Two gyros under the seat keep this vehicle standing up at a stop, which is easier on the driver's legs than putting a foot down the way you do while riding most motorcycles

    Seems like overkill to me. I have ridden some good sized bikes and, I mean, this was an issue for a little while, until I realized that I didn't really need to hold up that much weight. You know the bike, it has this big wheels....they can take the bike's weight, leave it on them. You don't need to take that much weight on your leg to keep stable.

    Once in motion, the bike has two big rubber flywheels that do a great job of "self balancing". Overall I think the MSF course is probably a better buy than a bike with an extra flywheel. I actually learned on my own in a parking lot before I took the course and had to break myself of a bunch of bad habits, including how I sat at a stop.

    --
    "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  46. Re: I have to put my feet down again! by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    Not on my cruiser. No standing position at all. More akin to a recliner position, if anything...

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  47. FF Motorcycle Solved? by GrahamCox · · Score: 2

    Lots of sneering from motorcyclists, that's to be expected. But in fact this type of design has been attempted for many years (it's called the "feet forwards" or FF motorcycle) and the rationale for it is pretty sound: a small, efficient, personal transport that is as nimble as a motorcycle but has the comfort of a car.

    The main problem with attempts made to date has been the one of staying upright when stationary. Some designs had open sides so you could use your feet, but that obviously compromises bad-weather comfort. Others have pop-down stabilisers but that's inelegant and difficult to make work at the right moment. If this has solved that problem and truly allows an enclosed cabin, they might have actually finally done it. I think this could well have a significant market, but probably not one with existing die-hard motorcyclists. I like it; it's pretty cool and I wish them well.

    While batteries are at the energy densities they are, this size of vehicle makes a lot more sense than an SUV-sized behemoth. I've done the maths, and excellent performance and range are perfectly doable with LiPO4 technology, 20kW of power at a gross vehicle weight of 400kg. I think it definitely has a future.

    1. Re:FF Motorcycle Solved? by Overzeetop · · Score: 2

      I don't know - I think I might prefer to pay the energy penalty for the (now defunct) Aptera two seater and avoid the whole gyro thing.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    2. Re:FF Motorcycle Solved? by WillAdams · · Score: 1

      Agree, it's an interesting solution.

      If the price point were more like to that of Elio Motors, $6,800: http://www.eliomotors.com/

      it'd be a lot more interesting, and I'm certainly looking forward to seeing someone make an electric version of the Elio or something like it.

      William
      (who rode his daughter's bicycle in to work today)

      --
      Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
    3. Re:FF Motorcycle Solved? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The C1 is not for motorcyclists. Motorcyclists already have motorcycles, and yes, most of us are aware that motorcycles balance and steer and brake just fine, with a modicum of skill and training. But a motorcycle is a big commitment, on many levels, that most people are just not willing to make. THAT is where the C1 comes in. It's for people who just would not ever consider a motorcyle. Driving the C1 is meant to be exactly like driving a car, you steer left and it just goes left. You just sit there and have none of the balance and counter-steering nuances necessary to ride a motorcycle. Staying upright at a standstill is just a minor but eye-grabbing consequence of the real trick of the C1 which is automated balance at all speeds and steering inputs. If you just turn the bars of a motorcycle left you will not go left, you will lean to the right and fall over unless you correct. The steering control of motorcycles and cars are completely different. If you turn the steering of the C1 left you will go left.

      In a C1 you don't need leathers, a helmet, gloves. You could wear shorts and flip flops. You won't sweat in hot weather and or get cold or wet in the rain. You don't need a special motorcycle safety course and riding in cold weather and rain is not more challenging than in a car. You'll have airbags. I think safety wise it's a huge step up from a motorcycle, though I would think much too small and light to be as safe as a car. I'm a 'retired' motorcyclist, having a young family, safety was the only real reason for that decision.

      Unlike a 3 wheeler you will lean into curves. You sit low and reclined like in a car so won't have the posture challenges or arm or butt aches of most motorcycle stances. (I've put in about 100,000 miles on street and dirt bikes so I can speak from experience here.)

      And yes having only 2 wheels really makes a huge difference aerodynamically, it's much less drag than a 3 wheeler, and lower and cleaner than any motorcycle. It's hard to imagine a 1 or 2 person vehicle with less total drag than this. You will go farther on a given battery pack than probably any other vehicle on the road. Also aesthetically, it's just visually cleaner and more elegant, and you get the full lean sensation of a motorcycle.

      Personally I think the C1 is the most original and exciting vehicle to come along in recent memory. Yes you could get a lot of the same benefits from a cheaper 3 wheeler like and Elio, which might also be pretty cool. But the C1 is a whole nother ball of wax. It's just frankly amazing. I can't afford one, but someday I can definitely see getting one.

  48. Lies, damn lies. and statistics. by westlake · · Score: 3, Informative

    According to these stats for Canada in 2009, car drivers suffered about 1173 deaths and 5393 serious injuries while among motorcyclists there were 194 deaths and 1271 serious injuries.

    According to the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), in 2006, 13.10 cars out of 100,000 ended up in fatal crashes. The rate for motorcycles is 72.34 per 100,000 registered motorcycles. Motorcycles also have a higher fatality rate per unit of distance travelled when compared with automobiles. Per vehicle mile traveled, motorcyclists' risk of a fatal crash is 35 times greater than a passenger car. In 2004, figures from the UK Department for Transport indicated that motorcycles have 16 times the rate of serious injuries compared to cars, and double the rate of bicycles.

    Additional data from the United States reveals that there are over four million motorcycles registered in the United States. Motorcycle fatalities represent approximately five percent of all highway fatalities each year, yet motorcycles represent just two percent of all registered vehicles in the United States. One of the main reasons motorcyclists are killed in crashes is because the motorcycle itself provides virtually no protection in a crash. For example, approximately 80 percent of reported motorcycle crashes result in injury or death; a comparable figure for automobiles is about 20 percent.

    Motorcycle safety

  49. Re: I have to put my feet down again! by Dishevel · · Score: 1

    Scooters are not motorcycles.

    --
    Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
  50. it looks cool but... by mtthwbrnd · · Score: 0

    ... poeple won't want it. People want a nice big car where they can put lots of shopping, the prams, the mother in law, a cup of coffee in the coffee holder etc...

    Also, are these batteries really better for the environment/planet than petrol? Even if you believe all of the Co2 BS, are they really better for the planet?

    1. Re:it looks cool but... by mtthwbrnd · · Score: 1

      What idiot spastic marked this as flame bait. It is a serious point. People DO want the type of car I described. It is legitimate to ask whether those batteries are better for the environment than petrol. Clearly marked by some idiot who beleives that the planet has been warming over the past decade when in fact it has not. Yawn.

  51. Names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    My first thought was "Ooh, a new C1".
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BMW_C1

    And then I noticed the [future] manufacturer's proposed name.

  52. How about turns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone else notice that none of the videos show the vehicle turning? We can only see it going straight.

  53. stupid by Tom · · Score: 1

    I hate /. videos. They're totally pointless because they convey no information that you couldn't push faster and more efficiently with a few screenshots and a transcript. They're just lazy journalism - a real journalist would take this, sit down with it and make a proper article out of it.

    Here's a video where you can actually see the thing drive, as well as a bit of its interior workings:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    There's more on Youtube and probably elsewhere. It's a pretty cool concept actually, the stupid video doesn't do it justice.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  54. Really bad choice of name... by Wdi · · Score: 1

    From all the possible names for a motorcycle, they felt they had to choose the one which is most likely to get them sued for trademark violation?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bmw_C1

    Covered and innovative motorcycle by BMW, in production 2000-2003.

    1. Re:Really bad choice of name... by phozz+bare · · Score: 2

      Here, let me read the FAQ for you:

      Q: Didn't BMW already use the name 'C-1'?
      A: Yep, they did (as did Chevrolet, Citroën, and a variety of others). 'C-1' is just a working name for our vehicle; it will change as we near production.

  55. Re:I prefer more tires for more contact with the r by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

    You don't want tires if you want to stop quickly.

    Warning: When stopping in these things they tilt forward. A car behind you will not stop as fast and could slide under it. When you have stopped you will fall back, crushing the car and the driver.

    --
    Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
  56. DÃf©jÃf vu? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gyro_monorail
    This?

  57. Re:I prefer more tires for more contact with the r by stjobe · · Score: 1

    You don't want tires if you want to stop quickly.

    You could have just linked to this video instead.

    (for the click-averse: It's a Leopard 2 tank from the Netherlands demonstrating its emergency brake system by going full tilt towards a line of people (allegedly the inventors of said emergency brake system) and then hitting the brakes).

    --
    "Total destruction the only solution" - Bob Marley
  58. Way to complicate a simple and elegant machine by kmx · · Score: 1

    I am continually amazed at the lengths people will go to to complicate a very simple and elegant machine. The traditional motorcycle chassis is simply a lever rotating around the headstock allowing its rider to balance with just a few newtons input into either handlebar. Once in motion it is inherently stable (due to the gyro force of the wheels spinning) and must be 'knocked' off of its present course with a mild rider input. Of course at rest, there is the possibility of it falling over, but, the lever still works when stationary, albeit with slightly more force required, and the rider can always put a foot down for extra stability.

    Are we a richer people for having downloaded an 'app' to do this, or would we be happier if we just used our minds and learned how to do stuff?!

    --
    Or maybe my moustache... is too rough.
  59. Fair point, but by Marrow · · Score: 1

    I wonder if the fuselage could be considered a helmet. Silly I know, but....

  60. recumbant and enclosed by Chirs · · Score: 2

    Being able to put feet down requires a more upright and open riding position.

    Removing that requirement enables a recumbant seating position (for better aerodynamics) and a fully-enclosed cabin. Making the cabin fully-enclosed allows for better protection from weather, better soundproofing, air conditioning, etc.

  61. Saw this in 1978 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Except their 16mm projector version of a youtube demo included them crossing a rocky riverbed.

  62. Cool! But won't BMW sue them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BMW C1: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BMW_C1

  63. Counting the ways this is stupid... working... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wind gusts? Making a turn from a stop? Starting at an angle in a hill? Basically what this is is a recumbent motorcycle. Yeah, let's take a small visual target and make it smaller and lower, and more vulnerable for good measure. Oh, and blind spots? Nice head check right there. Luggage? You mean the gyros hold the thing upright while you load and unload, right? And stuff doesn't shift around either in the boot, huh. Let's see the software for that one. Oh you mean it's always on- hm, I see, nice energy savings.
    Then you hop in, the gyros have to start spinning first then you get on your way and the side stand takes care of itself in the next left-hander I guess :) -- oh no wait, there's another electric ancillary for that too.
    Or you are trying to say that you need a bubble around you? Oh I see. Well you could refurbish an old 1950's Dustbin racer you know. See how that works for you and why oh why did we go away from that design.
    Go back to the bicycle recumbent. Ever went down a good downhill on one? Bet you didn't do that again. Just a note: the gyros will be unrelated to the engine speed below some point, so your low-speed leaning will just about never be the same one time to the other. Let's see you make a swerve in that vehicle. Which by the way begs the question... what kind of tyres will work correctly for it? Kind of a Gold Wing rear, what about the front?
    Should I go on?
    If you can't ride, you can't ride. It's not for everybody and there is no workaround either. I got a good laugh out of the "oh crap, I have to put a foot down" one.

    Oh and about the motorcycle fatalities: adjust your statistics for the enormous number of riders who do not wear a helmet and therefore die instead of being horrifically injured like they would be in a car, and then trade in a large proportion of these fatalities for injuries in car accidents...

  64. No tangible safety features of any kind by ToddInSF · · Score: 1

    For 24K you can buy a decent, durable, safe vehicle that you can drive safely in all types of weather.

    "The safety and the comfort of a car" is the kind of statement only someone "lit" could make with a straight face about this death-trap.

    On the bright side, the more hipster douchbags that buy this piece of over-priced crap, and die as a result, the better.