Slashdot Mirror


Ode To Sound Blaster: Are Discrete Audio Cards Still Worth the Investment?

MojoKid (1002251) writes "Back in the day (which is a scientific measurement for anyone who used to walk to school during snowstorms, uphill, both ways), integrated audio solutions had trouble earning respect. Many enthusiasts considered a sound card an essential piece to the PC building puzzle. It's been 25 years since the first Sound Blaster card was introduced, a pretty remarkable feat considering the diminished reliance on discrete audio in PCs, in general. These days, the Sound Blaster ZxR is Creative's flagship audio solution for PC power users. It boasts a signal-to-noise (SNR) of 124dB that Creative claims is 89.1 times better than your motherboard's integrated audio solution. It also features a built-in headphone amplifier, beamforming microphone, a multi-core Sound Core3D audio processor, and various proprietary audio technologies. While gaming there is no significant performance impact or benefit when going from onboard audio to the Sound Blaster ZxR. However, the Sound Blaster ZxR produced higher-quality in-game sound effects and it also produces noticeably superior audio in music and movies, provided your speakers can keep up."

27 of 502 comments (clear)

  1. No. by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Onboard sound is finally Good Enough*, and has been Good Enough* for a long time now.

    * YMMV, offer void in Tennessee.

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    1. Re:No. by jandrese · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The /. writeup sounds like audiophile wank to me. I would be surprised if this Soundblaster could justify its price in a proper double blind study on real world data (music, games, movies, etc...) vs. the built in audio on your mobo.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    2. Re:No. by shadowrat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The results of my study with a sample of 1 is: I can't tell the difference. I stopped buying discrete cards a long time ago.

    3. Re:No. by Jahoda · · Score: 4, Funny

      Which is ironic, because no audiophile would ever use gear from Creative Labs, ever, EVER.

    4. Re:No. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      People who really care about audio quality don't buy Creative hardware anyway. That's for gamers. If you want sound quality there are many cards with cheap but excellent chipsets. Via Envy24 codes and Wolfson DACs are the preferred combination, and cards with them cost under a tenner.

      Much better to spend the money on better speakers or a headphone amp. If you really want high end sound get an external DAC.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:No. by fustakrakich · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, you do have to use Monster Cables, and Klipsch speakers in a soundproof isobaric chamber

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    6. Re:No. by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Soundblaster cards don't have the imaginary qualities audiophiles look for?

      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
    7. Re:No. by tomhath · · Score: 4, Funny

      Only if you use the gold plated cables.

    8. Re:No. by techno-vampire · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I believe the word you want is "audiophule." You know, the type that claims that they can hear differences that an oscilloscope doesn't show?

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    9. Re:No. by Desler · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Why do you lump Klipsch in with Monster Cables? The founder of Klipsch is renown for debunking many crap claims made by many speaker makers similar to the nonsense claims that Monster makes. Perhaps you mean "No highs. No lows. It's Bose"? K-horns, for example, have always been solid speakers.

    10. Re:No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Of course you can't tell the difference. You need the Monster cables to go with them!

  2. Slashvertisement event horizon by fishwallop · · Score: 4, Funny

    And past this post, no further information from Slashdot ever reached my location.

    1. Re:Slashvertisement event horizon by jenningsthecat · · Score: 4, Informative

      My thoughts exactly. A discussion of the merits of add-on vs built-in sound hardware is worthwhile on its own terms; but basing the discussion on a specific add-on card, with the flimsy excuse of one company's 25th anniversary, strikes me as blatant shilling.

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
  3. Hasn't been true for a while by Hamsterdan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes, a discrete card might have *better* specs (especially analog components, which was a problem on older integrated soundcards), but I haven't felt the need to use a discrete card since my nForce 2 board (Soundstorm).

    Besides, it saves me from using Creative's bloatware.

    --
    I've got better things to do tonight than die.
    1. Re:Hasn't been true for a while by gsslay · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Besides, it saves me from using Creative's bloatware.

      This is what comes to my mind whenever I hear of Creative. Nice enough hardware, but shockingly bad software, 80% of which no-one ever had any need for. And it would invariably all be set up to load at boot-time, sucking up resources and RAM.

  4. Surely, It Depends by CanHasDIY · · Score: 4, Informative

    For the average user, onboard is just fine.

    For a power user (gamer/developer), onboard is probably good enough.

    If you're an audio pro and/or you're building a semi/professional audio rig, onboard isn't going to cut it 99% of the time.

    FWIW, plug in sound cards are actually more common than a lot of people think, because a lot of people seem to think that if it doesn't go into a PCI slot, it's not a sound card.

    The Rocksmith cable, with its built-in discrete audio unit, is a prime example, one that I use almost daily.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    1. Re:Surely, It Depends by Hamsterdan · · Score: 4, Informative

      "If you're an audio pro and/or you're building a semi/professional audio rig, onboard isn't going to cut it 99% of the time."

      True, but you won't be using a Soundblaster either, and that's where the article is wrong.

      There are way better cards at lower prices (Xonar, M-Audio)

      --
      I've got better things to do tonight than die.
  5. Creative can suck it. by buback · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm still bitter about Aureal.

    1. Re: Creative can suck it. by Rellon · · Score: 5, Informative

      Same here. That was the day that I said I would never, ever, buy a Creative Labs product again and I've stuck to it. Then again, they've made it so easy by producing products that were so bad.

      --
      "An Ye Harm None, Do What Ye Will" Wicca Rede
    2. Re:Creative can suck it. by Zaelath · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It was this for me: http://gizmodo.com/373748/crea...

      They had a weak point about the donations, but what they were really pissed about was not being able to force Vista users to buy a new sound card...

  6. Back in the day? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 4, Informative

    Back in the day, integrated audio solutions had trouble earning respect.

    No.

    Back in the day, integrated audio was the frickin' PC speaker that could only produce one square wave at a time with no volume control whatsoever, apart from software 'hacks'.

    And Creative Labs were far from the first ones, learn a bit of history and get off my lawn.

  7. You're much better off investing in speakers by ZorinLynx · · Score: 5, Informative

    Any money spent on a sound card is better off spent on speakers and a good DAC, which often come together.

    High end sound systems and speaker systems these days have digital inputs, thus an onboard DAC. If you're using a digital output on your motherboard to connect to a digital input on the speaker, the onboard sound card has ZERO effect on the quality of the audio. The bits are traveling directly, unmolested from the application generating them to the amplifiers in the speakers.

    Now, if you have audiophile-type equipment that uses analog inputs, then YES, the analog sound you feed into those inputs needs to come from a high quality DAC. High end sound cards tend to have good DACs, but you can get the same effect by using an outboard DAC, which has a digital input and analog outputs, and is also AWAY from your PC, so your analog audio is less likely to be affected by interference from the motherboard or power supply.

    You can get DACs with USB inputs, but USB adds latency so is best avoided for gaming. For music, go to town with a USB DAC; it won't matter there.

    The gist of it is, the most important component is the DAC. The DAC completely determines the quality. Everything else is just hype. :)

  8. Wouldn't use a soundblaster... by Zarquon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...but discrete soundcards, especially external ones, are still alive and well if you record. The noise floor of internal sound cards hasn't gotten that much better (a PC is very noisy RF environment), and if you need mic preamps, quarter inch jacks, optical in, etc, they generally don't fit on a PCI card or laptop.

    But for general gaming or home theater use? Nope. Send the audio out over the HDMI out, or SPDIF for DVI/VGA rigs, and let the amp sort it out.

    -R C

    --
    "'Tis great confidence in a friend to tell him your faults, greater to tell him his." --Poor Richard's Almanac
  9. Shut up and take my money! by Chelloveck · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can't wait to buy a shiny new Sound Blaster ZxR so I can get that noticeably superior audio. It'll be great for my collection of 128 Kbps MP3s!

    --
    Chelloveck
    I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
  10. Re:USB DACs by harrkev · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A USB audio interface also lies outside the electrically noisy interior of a PC chassis.

    Strong caution with USB audio. There is a metric buttload of cheap USB adapters, While they technically work, they typically lack analog filtering that gets rid of higher harmonics. If you look at the output on an oscilloscope, instead of a smooth wave, you see the actual steps. Better audio hardware should have filters to smooth this stuff out.

    Another MAJOR thing is inducing noise into the output. This is not just for USB cards, but all audio solutions. You need some pretty good filtering between the digital and analog power domains -- yet another area where cheap sound can skimp. Hey, let's shave $0.05 off by dropping this capacitor and inductor!

    The original article really touches on two separate areas:
    1) Audio processing
    2) Higher quality audio circuitry

    SoundBlaster (and other gaming-oriented cards) typically do both. However, do you really NEED both? The audio processing stuff is supposed to provide an API that games can use to make thing sound more realistic, or offload audio processing from software to hardware, or both. It can typically decode various dolby flavors, and do some other fancy DSP-ish type stuff. Do you really NEED all of that? If so, then maybe a gaming card is for you.

    However, what if you want the best sound possible, the lowest noise possible, and don't really game or use the various audio enhancements? You just want a plain-vanilla sound card, but with the highest quality audio. Where to do? Skip the computer store, but go to your local MUSIC store (not the ones that sell CD's, the ones that sell GUITARS). Those cards skip all of the DSP bells and whistles, but have the best-quality DACs and filtering that you can find. You can find some really good USB solutions that will blow on-board audio out of the water for about $100 or so. Of course, you can go crazy and spend $500 or more if you want. If it is good enough for a music producer to use in a studio (who makes his or her living off of the sound), it is probably good enough for YOUR music and movies.

    --
    "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
  11. Re:USB DACs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Everybody listen to Harrkev.
    Working as an audio professional, and electrical design hobbyist who has designed many audio circuits, I agree 100% with his statements.

    USB in particular is some noisy shite if it's not done properly and corners are cut, it can also be really great for the price if done right.

    And yes, spending $100 on a used pro audio interface at a music shop can get you the quality of a brand new $500 interface if you know whats what.

  12. Re:USB DACs by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 4, Informative

    There's no need to spend that much. A lot of motherboards have S/PDIF outputs, and with a good coax/TOSLINK DAC (like the ~$40 FiiO D3), pristine noise-free stereo sound is both easier and cheaper than buying an expensive sound card.

    --
    Eat the rich.