Slashdot Mirror


Chinese State Media Declares iPhone a Threat To National Security

MojoKid writes: "When NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden came forth last year with U.S. government spying secrets, it didn't take long to realize that some of the information revealed could bring on serious repercussions — not just for the U.S. government, but also for U.S.-based companies. The latest to feel the hit? None other than Apple, and in a region the company has been working hard to increase market share: China. China, via state media, has today declared that Apple's iPhone is a threat to national security — all because of its thorough tracking capabilities. It has the ability to keep track of user locations, and to the country, this could potentially reveal "state secrets" somehow. It's being noted that the iPhone will continue to track the user to some extent even if the overall feature is disabled. China's iPhone ousting comes hot on the heels of Russia's industry and trade deeming AMD and Intel processors to be untrustworthy. The nation will instead be building its own ARM-based "Baikal" processor.

94 of 143 comments (clear)

  1. Hope in humanity is lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sigh. How sad it is -we humans- are the very reason why we cannot have nice things.

  2. Seriously, an iphone? by rcht148 · · Score: 1

    How much work do you do on an iphone that would be a threat to national security?
    I thought something like Windows makes more sense.

    1. Re:Seriously, an iphone? by Noah+Haders · · Score: 2

      Emails. Calendar. Email attachments. Apple just got pwned.

    2. Re:Seriously, an iphone? by rcht148 · · Score: 1

      Didn't say that there is no exposure at all. Just wanted to say that there are bigger targets out there compared to an iphone.

    3. Re:Seriously, an iphone? by demonrob · · Score: 1

      Its not the work on the phone - its the tracking of the location.

    4. Re:Seriously, an iphone? by gizmo2199 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      IDK, a smartphone is the perfect spying machine.

      Not only do people keep their whole lives on their phone, email, pictures, documents, passwords, social media accounts, but the same device is fully portable, has a GPS receiver, picks up and connects to open wifi APs, has a microphone, and accelerometer.

      So you can find out what your target is up to, what he's planning, who he's talking to, where he is, and how fast he's moving, and by extension you get acces to his digital life.

      --
      This Sig does not Exist.
    5. Re:Seriously, an iphone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How much work do you do on an iphone that would be a threat to national security?

      Zero is enough.

      You're carrying around a camera and microphone and a bunch of other sensors including antennas, and you have no idea what they're recording or when or what they're uploading the recordings to. That's enough. If the bug isn't yours, then it's someone else's.

      If you're doing more than zero work with it, then you're extra fucked.

      The weird thing about this, is that it's so late. 2014, China?! Here in America we already knew iPhones were working against their users, since 2007. "I can't install just whatever the fuck software I want, and Apple gets to choose what apps are in the one and only store that I'm allowed to use? This isn't a personal computer, it's a game console!"

      Actually, I think I might know why this is happening in 2014. I know a guy at Sandia Labs, and he mentioned that recently they started letting 'em take iPhones into the tech areas. So, while we knew the machines were intended to work against their owners, we never knew who the machines were working for. And now we do. By the US allowing iPhones into spooky places, they're implicitly telling everyone "it was US, all along." Most of us probably assumed the user's adversary for the machine's allegiance was Apple, not our government. That might have freaked China out.

    6. Re:Seriously, an iphone? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The NSA and GCHQ have always wanted more info on China. From flying drones Lockheed D-21 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... to funding CIA Tibetan program https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... to using commercial shipping to gather signals intelligence.
      China has its own brands of phones to sell, domestically and globally. Why risk staff wondering around with product lines mentioned in connection with foreign intelligence services?

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    7. Re:Seriously, an iphone? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Its not the work on the phone - its the tracking of the location.

      Have these idiots just discovered how cellular phone systems work? Tracking is the very heart of the process.

      With the other goodies that the phone has on it, it's always been a security risk. Then again, any smartphone does. Going to ban cellular phone?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    8. Re:Seriously, an iphone? by cold+fjord · · Score: 5, Informative

      The NSA and GCHQ have always wanted more info on China.

      Isn't turnabout is fair play?.

      China's Growing Spy Threat

      But according to analysts and officials, the communist-controlled People’s Republic of China operates the single largest intelligence-gathering apparatus in the world—and its growing appetite for secrets has apparently become insatiable.

      From economic and military espionage to keeping tabs on exiled dissidents, China’s global spying operations are rapidly expanding. And, therefore, so is the threat. Some analysts even argue the regime—which is also gobbling up such key natural resources as farmland, energy, and minerals—has an eye on dominating the world.

      Estimates on the number of spies and agents employed by the communist state vary widely. According to public statements by French author and investigative journalist Roger Faligot, who has written several books about the regime’s security services, there are around two million Chinese working directly or indirectly for China’s intelligence apparatus.

      Other analysts say it would be impossible to count the exact number. ‘I doubt they know themselves,’ says Richard Fisher, a senior fellow on Asian military affairs at the Washington-based International Assessment and Strategy Center. Regardless, the number is undoubtedly extraordinary. ‘China can rightly claim to have the world’s largest, most amorphous, but also most active intelligence sector,’ he says.

      Russia, China engaging in industrial espionage

      Germany is full of Russian and Chinese spies working to get information about top business and technology developments, according to the country’s domestic intelligence service.

      Studies show that the German economy loses around €50 billion a year as a consequence, Burkhard Even, head of the counterintelligence section of the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution, told the audience at a recent security forum in Bonn. . . .

      There are around 80,000 Chinese people living in Germany, Even said, many of whom are commercial spies. China is also buying into, or taking over companies completely, in order to get access to new technological developments. . . . . . the Chinese were mostly active in the electronic sector. Some reports suggest the Chinese intelligence services have up to a million agents across the world collecting technical and business data to support their industries.

      "It is estimated that at least 20 Foreign intelligence services are operating to some degree against UK interests. Of greatest concern are the Russians and Chinese. The number of Russian intelligence officers in London has not fallen since the Soviet times."
       

      Britain Warned Businesses of Threat of Chinese Spying

      Canada a target-rich environment for Chinese spies

      Officials say Chinese spies have targeted every sector of the U.S. economy

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    9. Re:Seriously, an iphone? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Tracking is separate from recorded and forwarded history of travel. It has always been possible to hire an agent to follow a specific indivdual. This is different from carrying a device which tracks everybody by default at a very low cost.

      An external agent to track dumb cellphones is far more complex than having an agent running inside a smart phone. It involves pretty substantial external resources and doesn't easily scale to large populations.

      You knew this, I hope, and were just trolling us. Right?

    10. Re:Seriously, an iphone? by dryeo · · Score: 2

      The difference is that it is America that is a direct threat to my personal freedom and the personal freedom of much of the world. Remember, for most Americans Constitutional freedoms only apply to American citizens and the rest of us are fair game.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    11. Re:Seriously, an iphone? by cold+fjord · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      You don't seem to be acquainted with the concept of sovereignty. Law contains rights and responsibilities, but in general any body of law is limited to the territory of the sovereign government that created the law. American law governs America. Canadian law governs Canada. Finnish law governs Finland. Canadian law doesn't govern Finland, Germany, or America. Finnish law doesn't govern Italy or Cuba. The law of the sea is a special case. (I wouldn't be surprised if you are a pirate even if you don't sail the seas looking for mischief.)

      If the legal protections of your country apply to Americans, why aren't lawyers from your embassy assisting Americans accused of crimes? Where are the social welfare payments? Do you suppose it is possible that the rights of citizens or residents of your nation don't apply to Americans in America?

      If America truly does threaten your freedoms I assume you must be doing something unsavory and special.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    12. Re:Seriously, an iphone? by invictusvoyd · · Score: 2

      What is an I phone ?
      -- Richard Stallman

    13. Re:Seriously, an iphone? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      ou knew this, I hope, and were just trolling us. Right?

      Correct -- and the smartphone that isn't capable of actively tracking a person is?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    14. Re:Seriously, an iphone? by dryeo · · Score: 1

      It is generally considered that certain fundamental rights exist outside of law so while American law governs America, it does not mean that America should just ignore rights outside of America. Even worse America has a long history of actually forcing regime change, which breaks sovereignty.

      If America truly does threaten your freedoms I assume you must be doing something unsavory and special.

      Yes, the evil of playing my legally bought DVD on my computer after breaking the encryption on it.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    15. Re:Seriously, an iphone? by ewieling · · Score: 1
      the smartphone that isn't capable of actively tracking a person is?


      Answer: The cellphone you left at home or the cellphone which is powered off. It may be inconvenient to not have a cellphone available at all times, but it is not impossible.
      --
      I really shouldn't have used someone else's email address for this account.
    16. Re:Seriously, an iphone? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      You're conflating "phone" and "smartphone". They are different things.

      People can phone me and send well-crafted packets as much as they want, but they won't be able to turn on my phone's WiFi, accelerometer or GPS because the hardware doesn't exist. And I can answer work emails any time that I want to - by going home and logging into my computer and thence into the mail server. Which suits me fine - I don't want to answer work-email when I'm on leave.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    17. Re:Seriously, an iphone? by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      So what are these rights of your that you think America is violating as you sit in your bedroom listening to cracked DVDs on your computer? Do you think the US will invade because of it?

      WW2 and the Iraq war weren't fought over DVD pirating.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    18. Re:Seriously, an iphone? by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      There are several well known cases where people were forcibly extradited or are under a significant threat and pressure to be extradited to US for things that are legal in their country of residence, but illegal in US.

      Kim Dotcom comes to mind of the more recent and noted cases, as well as a couple of others.

      Then there's the extraordinary rendition program.

    19. Re:Seriously, an iphone? by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Kim Dotcom may not be such a good example.

      Kim Dotcom Extradition Decision Delayed

      The Internet entrepreneur and his fellow defendants— Finn Batato, Mathias Ortmann and Bram van der Kolk —were due to appear in a New Zealand court at the end of July for a hearing on whether they would be sent to the U.S. to face charges including criminal copyright infringement, money laundering and conspiracy to commit racketeering.

      It is ridiculous to pretend that extraordinary rendition is a threat to the rights of typical Europeans. Or did I miss a trend in Europe to join international terrorist groups?

      Now look at what the claim was that I responded to: "The difference is that it is America that is a direct threat to my personal freedom and the personal freedom of much of the world."

      Are you really going to try to claim that nonsense it true? If you want to do that I think you're going to have to cast a much wider net than a small handful of disputed extradition cases, including ones connected with terrorism.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    20. Re:Seriously, an iphone? by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      Here's one example of several average, innocent Europeans severely affected by extraordinary rendition. CIA "woops grabbed the wrong guy".
      There are several examples of this.

      http://www.france24.com/en/201...

      And holy crap, "he could actually fight the decision after they broke into his home with heavy assault weapons, and so on, and almost got him extradited post haste". Clearly a sign of benevolent US not threatening citizens of other countries.

      Hey dumbass. It may be normal for insane person like you that police can smash its way into your home with assault weapons, beat you up, smash your place and break your business. It's not normal around here however. We are not anywhere near as deep into the police state insanity that US is, and it would be really nice if you stopped imagining that "just because we do it to our own people, we're entitled to do it to everyone else as well".

    21. Re:Seriously, an iphone? by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      How much work do you do on an iphone that would be a threat to national security? I thought something like Windows makes more sense.

      In general, anything without a removable battery and a camera or microphone is a threat to national security. The US declared this a long time ago. My cousin works as a civilian on an army base. Everybody, workers, soldiers, generals, etc, has been required to leave their phones in their car if they don't have a removable battery since cell phones were a thing, and IIRC, I think they just made that a no phone on base thing completely with the coming of smart phones.

  3. Man vs dragon.. by zr · · Score: 2

    Cutthroat competition often manifests this way in china. Cook has his work cut out for him..

    1. Re:Man vs dragon.. by zr · · Score: 1

      great timing pal, just as they managed to start moving jobs back..

    2. Re:Man vs dragon.. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      not really. The best thing that he can do is pull manufacturing from China. Seriously, at this time, Apple can build their own robotics plant here in America and bring it home.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  4. find my iphone by johnrpenner · · Score: 1

    they want — we find you.

    find my iphone — no good.

  5. Not just iPhone by xfizik · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Anything coming out of the U.S. is a threat to everybody else's national security.

    1. Re:Not just iPhone by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Anything coming out of the U.S. is a threat to everybody else's national security.

      Actually, anything with practically opaque internals is a potential security hole, including processors, compiled software, network equipment. Also anything involving telecommunications.

      If China is picking on only Apple, I'd wager it's to drum up business for some company that's owned by a state or an official.

    2. Re:Not just iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      See the harm that Snowden caused? The American worker is going to be out of a job, and the American economy is going to take a nose dive in the global market, all because Snowden didn't keep his big mouth shut.

      If he HAD kept his mouth shut...long with every other consultant the government spying agencies worked with....along with every other full time employee of said spying agencies...along with every disgruntled ex employee of said spying agencies....along with every hostile infiltrator that might attack said spying agencies in the future....then everything would have been FINE!

      The fact that this was going on at all is completely irrelevant. The politicians overseeing these operations are in the clear, because the work they were doing was only used for enlightened purposes by an enlightened government, which totally justifies it. No, these agencies didn't cause all this harm, the leakers did.

    3. Re:Not just iPhone by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Anything coming out of the U.S. is a threat to everybody else's national security.

      That sort of absolutist anti-American rant is ever popular on Slashdot, but it is nonsense, rubbish. It is like listening to a teenager chafing under parental authority complain that his parents are worse than Hitler when it is with practical certainly not true.

      The US has helped keep the free world free since the end of World War 2, and some people resent that and the failure of their preferred ideology.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    4. Re:Not just iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Pardon me coldfjord, but the US is now a police state.

    5. Re:Not just iPhone by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      whats the problem, all this shit is made in China

    6. Re:Not just iPhone by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Actually, anything with practically opaque internals is a potential security hole

      While true it doesn't change the fact that we know for sure that the NSA and GCHQ are extremely bad offenders. Maybe others are at it too, but all we can do is act on the information we have and that information says that American and British products are routinely bugged.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:Not just iPhone by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Since when? Last Tuesday? Denied dessert were you?

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    8. Re:Not just iPhone by profplump · · Score: 1

      Exactly. It's not the Chinese are opposed to phone tracking, it's that Apple hasn't agreed to let them access the data.

      Which doesn't necessarily make Apple the good guy, but having the Chinese government dislike them doesn't make them the bad guy either

    9. Re:Not just iPhone by xfizik · · Score: 1

      The US has helped keep the free world free since the end of World War 2, and some people resent that and the failure of their preferred ideology.

      If anything, the US has maintained a tight grip over the "free world" since the end of WWII. You are free to like this definition of "freedom", but this is not what freedom is supposed to be like.

    10. Re:Not just iPhone by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Could you expand on the nature of this "tight grip" over the free world, and the impact it has had? How do you think your freedom has been limited?

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    11. Re:Not just iPhone by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      The answer to that question requires you to define which specific traits you're asking for. If you're referring to "dragnet surveillance", that would probably be between 2000 and 2010 (time when most of the programs revealed by Snowden started to function). If it's about militarization of police and police having a right to break into your house and shoot you dead at any given moment just based on assumption and be indemnified by the law from responsibility as long as they had "a reason to believe there was a crime committed", that would be around 2005-2012 (police militarization and associated legislation). If you have another criteria, you can present it and people more knowledgeable than myself can probably provide you with an answer.

    12. Re:Not just iPhone by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      The answer to that question requires you to define which specific traits you're asking for.

      I think the question should go to the person that claims that the US is a police state when that clearly isn't true.

      The so-called "dragnet surveillance," by which I assume you are referring to NSA programs, is focused on terrorism and has at most limited relevance to criminal investigations, and none with political oppression.

      US police forces aren't militarized. The US doesn't even have any gendarmes as many European countries do. Many US police forces, especially larger ones, do have a Special Weapons And Tactics (SWAT) team, but in many cases it will be a part time duty, and in either case it represents a small part of the police department. They don't have the right to enter houses based on "assumptions," they have to get a warrant just like any other police officers minus any unusual events that would provide an existing legal exception. The main controversy is in their overuse to conduct raids and searches which would have been handled differently in the past, along with various unfortunate incidents. It is a technique that in my opinion is overused, but that is a different matter than constituting a "police state."

      If you want to go by those sorts of criteria, then most of Europe is a police state, and has been for a very long time. European countries have gendarmes, not the US. European countries engage in widespread surveillance over terrorism as well.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    13. Re:Not just iPhone by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Dear NSA PR agent. You are behind the times. Snowden already released the files debunking your current lies. The current line is that "yes, we conduct dragnet surveillance, we just don't look at it", and "yes, it resulted in oppression of innocents on occasions, but that has been rare and couldn't be helped and we don't really want to talk about it".

  6. You have only yourself to blame... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Dear China: YOU BUILT IT. I think if it was a problem, you'd have mentioned something before now...

    And do you really want to push the "national security" button on the iPhone, of all things?
    How much money does manufacturing those beautiful little bits of Americana add to your bottom line?
    I notice you're not complaining about Samsung, or any of your own local phones. How much less do they track people?

    1. Re:You have only yourself to blame... by KingOfBLASH · · Score: 1

      This could just be an excuse to avoid sending butt loads of cash to America to buy iphones.

      After all, China has no problems with oppressive technologies. You'd think they'd be lining up to get some of that iphone tracking goodness and further control their population.

    2. Re:You have only yourself to blame... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Dear China: YOU BUILT IT. I think if it was a problem, you'd have mentioned something before now...

      China only does assembly. They do not design the chips, and they do not write the software.

    3. Re:You have only yourself to blame... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Dear US: If you want to spy on yourself, more power to you. But we're not as dumb as you are.

      signed, China.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:You have only yourself to blame... by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      They build the hardware, however they do not make or have access to the source code or take the lions share of the profits. So more a source code demand along with an economic preference as well as pay back for communications exclusions. You seriously didn't think there were not going to be repercussions for that. The government of China knows full well the US government is run by US corporations, hence any actions taken by the US government against China's interests will be paid back by economic attacks upon US or applicable multi-national corporations. Thus forcing the US or multinational corporations to make their puppet alter it's policies with regard to China. Get used to it, every time the US misbehaves Russia and China as well as large chunks of the rest of the world will take it out against those that control the US government and force policy change.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    5. Re:You have only yourself to blame... by ComputersKai · · Score: 2

      I notice you're not complaining about Samsung, or any of your own local phones. How much less do they track people?

      Proprietary software means that they have no way of checking if anything is built in. Though this is likely an attempt by China to boost their own companies' advantages in the market, they have justifiable reasons regarding the security of U.S. closed-source software.

    6. Re:You have only yourself to blame... by ComputersKai · · Score: 1

      After all, China has no problems with oppressive technologies. You'd think they'd be lining up to get some of that iphone tracking goodness and further control their population.

      ...but not when the N-Ass-A is also doing that job.

    7. Re:You have only yourself to blame... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Dear China: YOU BUILT IT. I think if it was a problem, you'd have mentioned something before now...

      China didn't build the OS, and that's where the concern comes from.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    8. Re:You have only yourself to blame... by HiThere · · Score: 1

      You are embarassing. The GP was right about ONE of the messages being sent by this action. It's probably also intended to help a local company. And It's probably also intended to assist in upcoming negotiations with Apple. Etc.

      Don't think that a government announcement sends only one message. Each one sends multiple messages.

      Also, don't think that just because China has no problem spying on itself, that it wants anybody else to do so, no matter what it, itself, does abroad. The Chinese government is historically more insular and self-centered than even the US government, and with good reason. China holds most of the world's population, just as Africa holds most of the worlds genetic diversity (among humans). If Africa weren't so fragmented they would also be justified in thinking of the rest of the world as "insignificant tag-ends".

      FWIW, you might consider that the current supercomputer speed record is held by a Chinese computer. They may have copied much of the technology from elsewhere, but they've certainly improved on it locally.

      P.S.: Much of the information that you refer to as being stolen was actually transferred under contractual terms. I will grant that this isn't true of all of it, but if you look back a couple of centuries, you'll see that the North American colonies, and later the United States did a lot of technology stealing from Britain. As well as getting a lot of it via contractual transfer.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    9. Re:You have only yourself to blame... by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1

      China holds most of the world's population

      (By "most" you presumably mean "a plurality"; most of the world's ~7 billion people don't live in China, with its ~1.4 billion people.)

    10. Re:You have only yourself to blame... by sjames · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the U.S. should also declare the iPhone to be a security threat.

    11. Re: You have only yourself to blame... by sjames · · Score: 1

      Because who knows what 'extras' might have been included when they were made in China.

    12. Re:You have only yourself to blame... by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Actually, I was just repeating a factoid I'd heard elsewhere. I gratefully accept your correction. (But do note that it doesn't change the point, merely slightly decreases it's significance.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  7. Agreed! by dysmal · · Score: 1

    Agreed simply because of how many people are too busy staring at their phones and not paying attention to their surroundings to notice that a tank is about to run them over in Tiananmen Square!

  8. Made in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I guess China doesn't want Apple's business anymore.

  9. Let me guess... by maccodemonkey · · Score: 1

    China is going to shortly release a state sponsored phone running their own OS and hardware that is totally "secure."

    It's understandable that a nation like China would want to get in on the cell phone industry more deeply. Being able to insure a monopoly in China by scaring everyone away from the competition would create a huge, profitable industry internally. I just have a hard time taking what they're saying at face value.

    And yes, before someone mentions it, I know the US does similar things for their own ends.

    1. Re:Let me guess... by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      The odd thing is that it is actually even likely that it's going to be more secure.

      Once I have to turn for a communist country to get freedom I guess it's time to start drinking heavily.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Let me guess... by HiThere · · Score: 1

      I thought they already had a couple, but perhaps those are from Tiawan.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  10. Do they know or not care? by djupedal · · Score: 1

    GM, Tesla, etc. all track you in real time...regardless of what country you may be in, so...is this just a push for domestic product? Remember that although Apple has a small percentage of the cellphone market in China, it has a large percentage of the smartphone market.

  11. They're Absolutely Right by preaction · · Score: 2

    They're right, it _is_ a privacy/security hole. Most people just don't care. Apparently including me.

  12. Good. Hit them in the pocketbook they'll push back by AnontheDestroyer · · Score: 1

    To be honest, I don't know much about the tracking feature, but it sounds like something where if one big corporation takes a hit, we'll see more push back from others. Make an example of them. (Please note, I own a lot of Apple products, I'm not anti-Apple by default, just on this issue.)

    Some temporary or permanent haircut to their profits is the only way to reach them.

    The Russian CPU is guaranteed to have more holes, if any of them are in fact flawed, though. Their citizens are nuts if they don't think so.

  13. pot and kettle by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    China is right: the iPhone is a gaping security hole.

    I also have little doubt that their "solution" will also be a gaping security hole, except that it will be designed so only China's intelligence services can exploit it.

    1. Re:pot and kettle by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 1

      China is right: the iPhone is a gaping security hole...

      ... as are Android and Windows Phone devices, they do the same kind of tracking and leeching of personal data.

      .... their "solution" will also be a gaping security hole, except that it will be designed so only China's intelligence services can exploit it.

      News at 11!!!

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
  14. China for Nobel Prize? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Bravo to China for holding Apple privacy accountable the way us Americans should.
    If the US Government and it's ears the NSA are allowed to violate the 4th amendment,
    Then what country can responsibly allow it's citizens to consume our "big brother in a box".

    1. Re:China for Nobel Prize? by HughJazz · · Score: 1

      China is right to not trust American tech products but unfortunately China also acts like big brother when it comes to privacy. Chinese citizens are heavily spied on by the Chinese government. All this spying is achieving is balkanizing the tech industry. At the moment If someone wants privacy it's a nobrainer one doesn't buy tech from countries that behave in wholesale spying i(i.e. US, China, GB, and possibly a few more).

  15. Does your CPU spy one you? by gizmo2199 · · Score: 1

    Let's say a hypothetical security service, such as the Norway Safety Alliance (NoSaal), wanted to collect intelligence by putting in a backdoor, secret registers, or something in a CPU manufactured by another hypothetical entity called Ingal, how would they do it?

    What intelligence gathering capability could you include in a CPU that would 1) not interfere in the normal functionality of the PC, or otherwise be detectable by the end-user?

    I've read that an entity like nosaal could read the electrical hum of the CPU from a distance to determine what it's doing, or maybe grab crypto keys that way.

    But could Ingal actually put code or some other way dope their CPUs without anyone knowing?

    And more importantly if that's the case, what could we do about?

    --
    This Sig does not Exist.
    1. Re:Does your CPU spy one you? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The phone would be ship with a local version of an international treaty like
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      If it is for sale and connects to your nations phone towers: call voice, location, tower dump, images, mic turn on would all be a nice list of law enforcement options.
      Its in the hardware and software layers that no average user can see but would be dual use to make the call on your telco network. You input a number or letter it is 'sent' as part of the networking or kept in memory as part of its normal user functionality. So yes new clean telco layer "code" could find its way down onto your phone as they just track your phone per tower.
      re what could we do about? Meet face to face without a phone? Buy a type writer? One time pad on paper? The phone as offered in many countries is a tracking beacon, camera, live microphone for voice prints, web bug and key logger :)

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  16. Wait a second by Maxwell · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I tired to find the original source. Don't see it. Instead all we have is "

    A report by broadcaster CCTV criticized the iPhone's "Frequent Locations" function for allowing users to be tracked and information about them revealed.

    "This is extremely sensitive data," said a researcher interviewed by the broadcaster. If the data were accessed, it could reveal an entire country's economic situation and "even state secrets," the researcher said."

    This is far, far from a government decree. The American equivalent would be an interview on PBS. Other than approving it to air, this has nothing to do with the government. I suspect most Chinese will see right through this, it may even help Apple sales.

    1. Re:Wait a second by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Would you risk your wage, good apartment, work, clearance, international travel, health care, pension, rank on been reported with consumer telco junk?

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  17. NSA destroying American jobs by HughJazz · · Score: 1

    NSA spies on everyone to "protect" us from tyrants that would spy on everyone. Makes sense. As a bonus the NSA has also done a fantastic job trimming down American tech industry jobs. Given the rampant unrepentant Orwellian spying surely every foreign government and corporation is eager to buy American technology products now.

    1. Re:NSA destroying American jobs by m00sh · · Score: 1

      NSA spies on everyone to "protect" us from tyrants that would spy on everyone. Makes sense. As a bonus the NSA has also done a fantastic job trimming down American tech industry jobs. Given the rampant unrepentant Orwellian spying surely every foreign government and corporation is eager to buy American technology products now.

      I was reading some books published in the 2008 and 2009. NSA was viewed as the stalwart of the security aspect of the internet, valiantly contributing to security software and keeping things organized and secure in that front.

      I think NSA should have done the opposite of what they did. Instead of spying, they should have created anti-spying tools and issued alerts on spying and privacy aspects of modern technology.

      Even if they created spying technology, it should have been created to prevent such spying by putting those tools out in public and letting security researchers figure out methods to solve these security and privacy problems. US software would then be seen as solid and trustworthy, and the whole world would have no problem using US software knowing that it is constantly monitored for security and privacy.

  18. Re:Good. Hit them in the pocketbook they'll push b by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Re The Russian CPU is guaranteed to ...... just be a cpu
    A Russian cpu would be like a cpu made in China - a cpu that can do some computing tasks at a price and speed that is still useful without questions surrounding its import, a stop over when shipped as part of a larger system. Jobs, security, growth and a full understanding of every aspect of the cpu design.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  19. Re:The Chinese market won't last forever by PPH · · Score: 1

    And then perhaps the Chinese will return the iPhone trademark to the stove company.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  20. Baikal? by Stargoat · · Score: 1

    Didn't Remington import for a number of years shotguns from a Russian company called Baikal? They were terrible guns for any use other than a club, poorly balanced and an action that made an I beam look flexible. But if you wanted a gun to club someone with, a Baikal was an awesome choice. It made a hellagood club - stout and durable. Thing was built like a tank.

    --
    Hoist Number One and Number Six.
  21. Golden era for intelligence agencies wordwide by Trachman · · Score: 1

    Imagine Chinese have the ability not only to track location of every phone, but also to activate at will. In the past intelligence operations took year to find important targets, establish contacts, recruiting and learning about inner working of organizations of interests. In order to spy now all you need is a telephone # or email. That being said, would you be comfortable if you knew that Chinese have a capacity to listen not only the phone calls but also to record conversations near the phone at any time. Perhaps there are many professions where it does not matter what the telephone holder is talking about, but there are plenty of professions that can have a profound impact to security: military, intelligence, scientific areas for example. The truth is people are conditioned to assume that it is ok if someone listens, but it is also truth that every government have state secrets and China is no exception.

  22. I'm glad by WaffleMonster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Here is my problem with Apple, Google and Microsoft.

    Each vendor is using crowd sourced location / WiFi sniffing / map building excuses to collect location data from everyone. At least one vendor offers no ability to disable crowd sourcing without also preventing GPS from being used.

    GPS ASIC's have advanced to the point where standard excuses (uses too much power, takes too long to get a fix, some indoor use) are no longer applicable. This appears to in no way be discouraging vendors from selecting shitty GPS components while propagating excuses which unnecessarily eat into data plans and upload all of your data.

    Think of this from the Chinese perspective. Instead of everyone's location data being uploaded to Google or Apple ... what if it was all going to Huawei? Would US officials be comfortable with data about everyone's location constantly uploaded "anonymously" to Huawei?

    I think we are all better off if vendors used more capable GPS chips in their handsets and location data is not constantly being uploaded to any single vendor for any reason by default.

  23. Fair Play? by ComputersKai · · Score: 1

    The same also applies as a valid reason against us.

  24. Re:Retaliation for our treatment of Huawei and ZTE by WaffleMonster · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And for the record, from a security and privavy standpoint at least, I'll take an iPhone any day over an Android.

    I'll take Android ASOP/custom rom over carrier shitware infested Android + Google play services or the iPhone any day.

    Amazing how much longer battery lasts when your phone is not constantly violating your privacy and wracking up data usage for stupid reasons.

  25. Good way to gut-punch the US economy by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    Apple represents a freaking quarter of the US economy. One company. Making locked-down toy computers.

    We're living in a sci-fi dystopia.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:Good way to gut-punch the US economy by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Apple represents a freaking quarter of the US economy.

      Uh, math is hard for you or something?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  26. It Really Does by JimSadler · · Score: 2

    Being able to track people really could have a negative effect on national security. For example one might determine locations where a lot of people with advanced degrees in physics or know to have special ability in subjects such as high powered lasers congregate. The workplaces of many of these folks could easily be national defense facilities. People know to specialize in encryption might also congregate at certain workplaces. Even purchasing certain books may lead to individuals that an enemy might want to target or even corrupt or kidnap.

  27. Re:What if they know something we don't? by HiThere · · Score: 1

    Well...I'm not sure how hidden it is. We know that they are Apple surveilance devices, and we know that Apple will roll over if the Feds ask them to.

    That said, I'd be surprised if there weren't zero-day exploits that haven't yet been made public. OTOH, the same is true for EVERY smart phone.

    We've also be informed that the NSA records 80% of all voice conversations. (True? False? No way to check.) This plausibly means that they have all cell phone towers bugged. So they probably rarely need to bother Apple for the information.

    Siri clearly requires that the phone know where you are to properly understand you. (Also to communicate with you.)

    Etc.

    So whether they were intentionally designed for the purpose of being a surveilance device or not (I lean towards not) the capabilities are there. It has also been reported that the microphones and cameras can be remotely activated without signal to the user. Bug or feature? Or did it start out as a bug, but has not been documented?

    Whatever, what Apple has been accused of seems blatantly true. But perhaps a result of feature creep than of malign intentions.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  28. laptop by hendrikboom · · Score: 1

    Still waiting for my ARM Linux laptop with a good touchscreen.

  29. Re:The Chinese market won't last forever by m00sh · · Score: 1

    Non-Chinese companies (sometimes thru Foxconn) employ Chinese workers to build parts (ex: processors) and/or entire devices (ex: phones). Some of the managers in the Chinese factories are Chinese. I'd guess the repair people, who repair damaged manufacturing equipment, are Chinese.

    So they learn to staff and run a factory that manufactures electronic devices. Now that they know how to do so, why do they need American companies? They will start manufacturing the parts themselves, moving in the direction of making the entire device themselves. Once they can make their own devices, the government can require that their people buy those devices, only if made by they were made by Chinese companies. For "security reasons", of course.

    I suggest Tim Cook remember that the Chinese market won't last forever. Sooner or later, Chinese companies will make phones, tablets, etc., and the Chinese people will buy those devices, not Apple devices.

    Anything can happen in the future. We want phones now and cheap and they can make it now. If you care so much about the future and craft it so cautiously, even the smallest of changes in technological advancements will wreck all your future plans.

    Technology moves so fast and China has always been one step behind, one version behind. Doesn't mean they will ever catch up unless they invest heavily in R&D and actually catch with the big boys. By the time they learn something, it has been improved on and moved on. Sure, they can catch the low margin markets in mature technology but never in high margin technology.

    On the other hand, maybe they will catch up and make competing products. Are you really scared of a little competition? On the other hand, technology will move even faster with a larger consumer base and a larger number of companies making cutting edge products.

  30. Not a threat to security by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

    Not a threat to security. More of a threat to global mental health.

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  31. Bing it on! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    because iMaps had citizens crashing into military buildings.

  32. WAAAAYYYY to late by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

    sorry china.
    you infected yourself with american popular culture.
    there is no cure.
    now buy our shitty hollywood action flicks by the billions.
    next up, beer and weed.
    and we just started selling the mustang in china, with the v8.

  33. certification of FOSS baseband by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1

    China only does assembly. They do not design the chips, and they do not write the software.

    Not only that, there is the problem that nearly everyone chooses to ignore, the insecure baseband system and processor. One of the biggest moves China could make would be to both design and certify a processor and a baseboand OS. Then they could just run their own version of Replicant or whatever on the other processor while knowing that the 'hidden' part of the system is also clean. It's the certification that is a big barrier for most teams but China could squash it easily.

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
  34. Too right! by golodh · · Score: 1
    Those bastards at Apple probably refused to give them the source code and also won't put all trace-and-track functionality at the disposal of Chinese Intelligence services.

    Too frickin right it's a National Intelligence Risk.

  35. It's NOT the release that was the problem... by Art+Challenor · · Score: 1

    "When NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden came forth last year with U.S. government spying secrets, it didn't take long to realize that some of the behavior of the U.S. government revealed could bring on serious repercussions"

  36. Tomorrows Headlines: by geowar · · Score: 1

    China government gives free iPhone to all citizens!

  37. Re:Retaliation for our treatment of Huawei and ZTE by ewieling · · Score: 1

    I had the opposite experience. CyanogenMod and AKOP used battery at such a rate my phone actually got warm when sitting on the desk doing nothing. That combined with crashing once a day or so made me go back to the carrier's firmware.

    --
    I really shouldn't have used someone else's email address for this account.
  38. Keep them then by Gallomimia · · Score: 1

    Do us a favor China, keep them eh? Dump them on the homes of the executives of FoxConn and blow open the doors of their slavery castle.

    --
    Sadly, a Libertarian cannot force his views on another, and freedom cannot spread as does the cancer known as religion.