Slashdot Mirror
Siberian Discovery Suggests Almost All Dinosaurs Were Feathered
A new study published in Science (abstract) suggests that most dinosaurs were covered with feathers. This conclusion was drawn after the discovery of fossils belonging to a 1.5-meter-long, two-legged dinosaur called Kulindadromeus zabaikalicus. "The fossils, which included six skulls and many more bones, greatly broaden the number of families of dinosaurs sporting feathers—downy, ribboned, and thin ones in this case—indicating that plumes evolved from the scales that covered earlier reptiles, probably as insulation." Its distinctiveness from earlier theropod fossil discoveries suggests that feathered dinosaurs appeared much further back in history than previously thought. Paleontologist Stephen Brusatte said, "This does mean that we can now be very confident that feathers weren't just an invention of birds and their closest relatives, but evolved much deeper in dinosaur history. I think that the common ancestor of dinosaurs probably had feathers, and that all dinosaurs had some type of feather, just like all mammals have some type of hair."
Time to remake Jurassic Park. And while he's at it, Speilberg can change all the guns to flashlights!
This means we'll have to redraw 200 years worth of artwork...
Only to idiots, are orders laws.
-- Henning von Tresckow
I remember hearing once that if the first dinosaurs discovered had wishbones we would have never said they went extinct. We would have said they were a past generation of birds that died off.
Find some more feathered fossils and conclude that ALL dinosaurs probably had feathers.
I propose that a heck of a lot more digging and research is necessary before anyone starts putting that in print.
Of course these dinosaurs couldn't fly; everyone knows that in the late Triassic, the Pterosaurs received a broad-reaching patent titled "Feathery Apparatus for Flight". Regrettably, the patent term length at the time was over one hundred million years.
Australia's Demon Duck of Doom
And that multi-color sun screen stuff on their noses.
Lost at C:>. Found at C.
The next Jurassic Park could be a lot more interesting.
But probably won't be.
Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
You realize Siberia wasn't above the arctic circle 160million years ago right? Also... the whole planet was a lot hotter.
Sounds like the dinosaurs were humiliated backwards... feathered ...then tarred.
There are two types of people in the world; those who believe there are two types of people, and those who don't.
For those of us who have been following the literature on the subject, this doesn't really come as a surprise. Rather than that this fossil shows that all/most dinosaurs had feathers where we previously assumed this to be the case only for some groups, this fossil is a confirmation of the already commonly held view (in the field) that feathers were to all probability basal in dinosaurs.
If she weighs the same as a duck.... she's made of wood!
"When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
Giant Chickensaurus Rex from Elmo in Grouchland?
http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net...
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Comment removed based on user account deletion
What's their definition of "most dinosaurs"? Maybe most as in, there was this one tiny feathered dinosaur that bred like rabbits and was everywhere? And do they mean "had feathers" as in had 3 tiny feathers on the top of a big lizardy dino head? Big dinos almost always had scales from what I've read. And perhaps size is part of is as is seen in recent animals and animals today... larger mammals have far far less fur except during the times of ice ages.
I found a couple of links that show scales, no feathers, of big dinosaurs. All this feather business is just hype.
http://blogs.discovermagazine....
The scale-like structures you see on dinosaur skin are known as called tubercles, and resemble the polygonal desiccation cracks that you might see on a dried up mud flat (because we all investigate sedimentary structures
http://www.amnh.org/exhibition...
Very little dinosaur skin fossilized, so what we know about sauropod skin comes from impressions made when it pressed into mud or sand that then hardened and turned to stone. These impressions show that sauropod skin had small bumps and scales that didn't overlap. Some sauropods had bony growths in the skin called osteoderms. But no sauropods had hair or feathers.
I've never understood this idea. Sure at a macroscopic scale there is some resemblance between scales and feathers, but on looking close you get an entirely different structure.
Scales being basically flat plates and feathers being long rods with interconnected hooks on them.
If this story is correct and way more dinosaurs had feathers than previously thought, then why force it?
Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
yup.
Not quite. Sauropods are dinosaurs too and none have been found with feathers that I'm aware of.
I timothy 2:3-4: "This is good, and it is pleasing in the sight of God our Savior, who desires all people to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth."
(see also 2 Peter 3:9)
So...God wants us to be saved, but you don't? You have in your hands an irrefutable test that will bring us all to knowledge of the truth (and hence salvation) and yet you are refusing to give it to us? Don't you want to please God by furthering his desires (that we all might be saved)? Are you not humble enough to think that God gave you this test to make you an instrument for His purposes (saving us)?
How about 1 Corinthians 13:2 "If I have the gift of prophecy and can fathom all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have a faith that can move mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing."
You don't love us enough to share your proof of God with us and save us? According to Paul, then, you are nothing, even though you can "fathom all mysteries."
Methinks your statements betray spite and arrogance. Jesus did not say very nice things about people like you.
I think he means plate tectonics, as in the land mass that would be Siberia was a lot further south at that point.
This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
But my guess is the other Dinobots won't like it.
"Me Grimlock no like being bird"
I've got better things to do tonight than die.
Even cold blooded animals do things to retain warmth and protect themselves from overheating. The distinction between warm and cold blooded isn't all or nothing.
No, it looked like a big freaking monster with feathers and long teeth.
Next they'll be telling us Pluto isn't a planet. Enough with this revisionism!
And by god if Brontosaurus was good enough for Fred Flintstone, it's good enough for me!
Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
Its my understandin that Asia has been mostly spinning clockwise as a result of plate tectonics, and the region that is Siberia is actually slightly further south today than it used to be.
File under 'M' for 'Manic ranting'
Judge for yourself, looks counterclockwise to me
This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
Best ever Movie
"in dinosaur history": really? There are historical documents written while dinosaurs were around? Ok, I admit I'm being a bit pedantic...