Slashdot Mirror


Jesse Jackson: Tech Diversity Is Next Civil Rights Step

theodp writes: U.S. civil rights leader Rev. Jesse Jackson called on the Obama administration Monday to scrutinize the tech industry's lack of diversity. "There's no talent shortage. There's an opportunity shortage," Jackson said, calling Silicon Valley "far worse" than many others, such as car makers that have been pressured by unions. He said tech behemoths have largely escaped scrutiny by a public dazzled with their cutting-edge gadgets. Jackson spoke to press after meeting with Labor Secretary Tom Perez for a review of H-1B visas, arguing that data show Americans have the skills and should have first access to high-paying tech work. Jackson's Rainbow Push Coalition plans to file a freedom-of-information request next month with the EEOC to acquire employment data for companies that have not yet disclosed it publicly, which includes Amazon, Broadcom, Oracle, Qualcomm and Yelp. Unlike the Dept. of Labor, Jackson isn't buying Silicon Valley's argument that minority hiring statistics are trade secrets. Five years after Google's HR Chief would only reassure Congress the company had "a very strong internal Black Googler Network" and its CEO brushed off similar questions about its diversity numbers by saying "we're pretty happy with the way our recruiting work," Google — under pressure from Jackson — fessed up to having a tech workforce that's only 1% Black, apparently par for the course in Silicon Valley.

36 of 514 comments (clear)

  1. Silicon Valley shakedown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Follow the money.

  2. Stop the idiocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Step #1 would be for not allowing people to look down on those who are smarter. Way too many people in the USA make it a point of pride that they are dumb.

    1. Re: Stop the idiocracy by Quirkz · · Score: 4, Funny

      Something about resistance is futile, right? Or is that Borg's law?

  3. He just doesent' get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Tech isn't about equal rights. It's about if you are smart enough to get it done.

    If there isn't a minority in there they are not smart enough.

    It's bad enough we have to deal with the Indians and Chinese with their H1B Visas and working practically for free, the last thing we need to do is be forced
    to work with someone who can't carry their own weight.

    1. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by MindStalker · · Score: 4, Informative

      http://www.nber.org/digest/sep...

      The National Bureau of Economic Research sent out 5,000 resumes to 1,300 jobs randomly assigning black or white sounding names to the resumes. The black sounding names received 50% less callbacks than the white sounding names.

  4. Experience outside the valley by Whorhay · · Score: 4, Informative

    I can't speak for what it is like in Silicon Valley but where I work in the deep south I would estimate that at least 30% of my fellow tech workers are of African ancestry.

  5. Confusing position by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm confused... is Jackson arguing for more Americans, or more black people, or more black Americans, to get tech jobs?

    After listening to Jackson over the years, it's now almost a reflex for me to argue against his statements. But I'm still sketchy on what they are in this case.

    1. Re:Confusing position by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There is no confusion, that racist is arguing specifically for black people. Not Americans in general or anything else. Instead of trying to get the government to lay down yet more regulations, he should really reach out to his communities and educate the vast majority of black people so they can get these tech jobs. The majority of black people live in low income areas and rarely ever leave. He needs to stop asking for handouts and actually start helping the people he claims to be helping.

    2. Re:Confusing position by DigiShaman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Reverse discrimination. Jesse Jackson is putting race, not skill level, as the priority imputes to employ more blacks. In his world view, society must bend over backwards to cater to the African American.

      Hey Jesse!!! Yeah you. They don't want to be an Uncle Tom. The idea of "white" culture (a culture of being educated and the further pursuit thereof) is what may of the blacks are against. Those that you represent value ignorance over everything else. For them, they derive power through victimization; and the liberal society is all to willing to go along with the coddle-fication of victimization attitude!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    3. Re:Confusing position by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 5, Informative

      Reverse discrimination.

      Sorry, but discrimination is discrimination. There is no direction. It either takes place or it doesn't. Using the term reverse gives advantage and power to one group over another.

      --
      There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
    4. Re:Confusing position by Nidi62 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Reverse discrimination.

      Sorry, but discrimination is discrimination. There is no direction. It either takes place or it doesn't. Using the term reverse gives advantage and power to one group over another.

      So would you argue that affirmative action and hiring/acceptance quotas are discrimination since they put a higher value on some races than they do others?

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    5. Re:Confusing position by CanHasDIY · · Score: 4, Insightful

      His arguments are, "pay attention to me so I can use the plight of African-Americans to fatten my own bank account."

      In fact, that's the only argument he and Sharpton have ever had. I pray, when they die, the ghost of MLK spends eternity bitch-slapping the both of them day in and day out.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  6. Probably going to get flamed for this by TJ_Phazerhacki · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But I have a hard time referring to Rev. Jackson by the titular "US Civil Rights Leader" when in fact, he is most widely known for promoting the civil rights of a specific minority. Also, and again, I don't like where this is going. Hiring should be based on qualification of skill, and NOTHING else. Trying to make up for inequality of upbringing by arbitrating diversity standards is as stupid today as it was 20 years ago.

    --
    Physics is nothing like religion. If it was, we'd have an easier time trying to raise money!
    1. Re:Probably going to get flamed for this by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Absolutely. And if only 1% of your staff is black you've got to suspect that something else is already in play...

      Starting with "how many African Americans have an education in tech?".

      When I went to university, I do not remember a single black person in my courses. Since then, I've known only a handful in tech.

      I've known and worked with Chinese, Vietnamese, Korean, Indian, Sri Lankan, Nepalese, Czech, Russian, Australian, Egyptian, Pakistani, Turkish and pretty much every other nationality I can think of -- which makes for awesome company pot lucks.

      And, for reasons I cannot even begin to explain, the only blacks/African Americans I've met have been what I'd call "recently African" (ie. first generation immigrants).

      I have never known anybody who refused to hire a qualified black candidate. But, in my experience (which admittedly doesn't cover everything), there's simply not many applicants.

      So, the question to ask is: do blacks, as a group, even go into tech? Are they self excluding from the profession? Is the education system failing to get them into it?

      I don't think it's so much that people are excluding anybody, it's that you can only include people who come to the game.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  7. Is Jackson arguing against diversity? by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 4, Informative

    He seems convinced that the tech companies with the fewest black developers make the most amazing products.

    It seems he's basically arguing that there's a correlation (and therefore maybe causality) between being diverse and not leading the market.

  8. The problem isn't color of one's skin... by hsthompson69 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...it's the content of one's culture.

    If Jesse wants more people with his skin color in the tech industry, he needs to get more of them into the proper culture.

    A thug mentality, and victimhood culture, does not succeed. A culture focused on academics, hard work, and personal responsibility does.

    1. Re:The problem isn't color of one's skin... by Whorhay · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree in general but that is not an absolute. We've seen ample evidence over the years of institutions like the police giving particular attention to black communities in a negative way. Simple possesion of an illegal narcotic is more likely to destroy your future job prospects as a young black man than if you belonged to any other ethnic group. And I don't know if that is because people of other ethnic groups treat them unfairly in the court system or if it is a self inflicted thing. I am always surprised by the extremely negative atitudes my succesful black co-workers have for any young black person who makes a poor decision. It's probably some mix of both those problems though.

  9. Good for him by roc97007 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    > Jackson spoke to press after meeting with Labor Secretary Tom Perez for a review of H-1B visas, arguing that data show Americans have the skills and should have first access to high-paying tech work.

    I usually find myself disagreeing with Jackson, but he seems to be on the right track here. I'm really hoping his involvement doesn't muddy the issue.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  10. Are only black people "diverse"? by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From a NYT article:

    Of Google’s technical staff, 60 percent are white, 1 percent are black, 2 percent are Hispanic, 34 percent are Asian and 3 percent are of two or more races.

    As I read it, America is about 63% non-Hispanic white. Which sounds pretty close to Google's proportion of white technical staff.

    It sounds like Jackson really needs to have a discussion as to why black people are being so out-hired by Asians.

  11. Re:RACIST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Posting as A. C because you are afraid to face the Black Man.

    Comander Taco, Now is the time for a -1 RACIST moderation to put these peope in there places!

    And that's EXACLTY how the Jesse Jackson shakedown works.

    "Do what I say or I'll call you a RAAAAAACIST!!!"

    Jackson really should patent that. It's a hell of an effective "business" method.

  12. Re:Mod parent DOWN by jedidiah · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's not racism to point out the fact that most H1B scab labor in IT is Indian. It's also not racist to point out that "lowering the bar" is bogus.

    If Jesse wants to wage the next race war, he should start by getting more black kids interested in STEM and education in general. He can fight against the pervasive drug and gang culture that keeps black kids away from any means to better themselves.

    Perhaps he could even get a bunch of athletes and rappers to just read to kids.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  13. Re:Mod parent DOWN by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who's going to read to the athletes and rappers?

  14. Re:Mod parent DOWN by John+Jorsett · · Score: 5, Informative

    If Jesse wants to wage the next race war, he should start by getting more black kids interested in STEM and education in general.

    Jackson isn't interested in waging race war, he wants to shakedown businesses for money for his organization and those of his cronies. Making it about race is just his form of extortion. Notice that whenever he goes after some company, it's suddenly made all better when it makes a donation to his cause and/or hires one or more people of Jackson's designation. I really admire the way the CEO of Cypress Semiconductor refused to knuckle under to Jackson back in 2001 after Jackson labeled Cypress a "white supremacist hate group.’” I hope every Silicon Valley target of his does the same.

  15. Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I can't speak for what it is like in Silicon Valley but where I work in the deep south I would estimate that at least 30% of my fellow tech workers are of African ancestry.

    This seems to only happen in a government setting. Am I right?

    I work in the in Metro Atlanta and I had a few (quite talented I might add) African-American developers. One saved my ass with an encryption routine.

    Geoffry was this Nubian -as he referred to himself - very sharp coder/developer/computer scientist/ or what ever title you want to give him.

    Back in Boca Raton, my boss was this African-American who was a cross between Link on Mod Squad and Mr. Rogers. Brilliant developer who had the management-leadership skills that would melt the brains of the best.

    If I were a rich man....yabba dabba doo ... I'd give him a billion dollars and make him rich too - and me richer.

  16. Re:RACIST! by lgw · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And that's EXACLTY how the Jesse Jackson shakedown works.

    "Do what I say or I'll call you a RAAAAAACIST!!!"

    Jackson really should patent that. It's a hell of an effective "business" method.

    Well, I have seen racism in dev shops before, to be sure, but not the sort that Reverend Jackson wants shakedown money for. I've worked for more than one place where "white men born in America" were about 2% of engineers. Normally, it's just not an issue, but at one place the racism was so bad that everyone not of the preferred race left over the course of 6 months after a shift of management. (Not saying what that race was, as the problem was just a couple of assholes, and not a more general problem).

    I've also seen straight-up redneck racist at the first dev shop I ever worked at, back when we rode dinosaurs to work, but that company was so exploitive that racism only makes the middle of its list of abuses.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  17. As an African American, this pisses me off by x_t0ken_407 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't get it...I worked hard and was determined, and built my career from the ground up, WITHOUT a college degree. I don't understand why or even how I've continuously found work in an industry that needs a civil rights movement...? Should I ask the myriad of previous and current minority co-workers their experiences and trials/tribulations in attempting to break into this industry with such a color barrier? This is a fucking slap in the face of the ACTUAL civil rights movement of the past, and it sickens me.

  18. Don't shoot the messenger by losttoy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I am an Indian (asian) and work in SF and have worked in a few big tech companies down in the valley. I understand that people like Jesse Jackson spew a lot of rhetoric for their own cause not necessarily for upliftment of the people he supposedly represents. And, I also understand, the solution isn't as easy as making tech companies have some sort of affirmative action - if there aren't enough black people with basic tech skills or college degrees then affirmative action isn't going to help. All that said, it is bizarre - in all the places I have worked including the current, there isn't a single black person on the entire floor. And, think, places like Oakland are just right across the Bay here but so few black people on the tech workforce. It speaks volumes about the failed social integration of black people in this nation - and it has failed at so many levels - from basic primary education, healthcare, law enforcement to higher education and outright discrimination. It doesn't matter who's to blame for it, really because at end of the day, you have a population that isn't as functional as the rest and we should be fixing that. Instead, we have these arguments where people don't even seem to recognize the problem.

  19. Re:Mod parent DOWN by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Funny

    So what you are saying is that we need a program where kids go in to read to athletes and rappers?

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  20. He's a crook by Charliemopps · · Score: 5, Informative

    Jesse Jackson is a crook and runs a business, not a charity... it's called the Rainbow/PUSH coalition: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R...
    They show up, accuse your business/industry of racism, do not letup until... you donate money to their cause, then they drop the issue.
    It's a scam.

    Just take a look at NASCAR.
    About 15yrs ago, NASCAR tried to break out of the south and become a mainstream sport. They were largely successful. Jesse Jackson saw this as an opportunity, went on morning talk shows and accused the industry of racism for their lack of black participants. Now, I'm not even going to argue that point... there are very few African Americans in NASCAR. It may very well have a problem with race... that's not the problem.

    What's the problem then? NASCAR then donated around $250,000 to Jesse Jacksons Rainbow Coalition and suddenly they were right with black America, Jessie Jackson dropped the issue and said NASCAR didn't have a race problem. NASCAR didn't add a single black employee or change any of their policies. The problem isn't that there isn't a racial divide in NASCAR or even Silicon Valley. The problem is Jessie Jackson doesn't care. He just wants to use that disparity to extort money from those businesses. He's a scam artist and a crook, and it's sad he's seen with such reverence in this country. He's done nothing but harm the black community and he should be ashamed of himself.

  21. Jackson should critique the black community first. by Morpeth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is not a racist rant, but a realistic look at some of the issues Jackson might want to address within the black community first before taking his usual stance of blaming everyone else:

    72% of black kids born out of wedlock (compared to 17% for Asians). The Rev [cough] Jackson himself had an affair & fathered a child with another woman.
    Double the unemployment rates of whites (roughly 5.4 to 11.5% as of last month)
    Why doesn't he talk about the negative affects of hip-hop culture (glorifying violence, promoting misogynistic attitudes to an extreme, promotes wealth through any (often illegal) means)
    On average, African American twelfth-grade students read at the same level as white eighth-grade students. 54% of African Americans graduate from high school, compared to more than three quarters of white and Asian students. [http://www.pbs.org/wnet/tavissmiley/tsr/too-important-to-fail/fact-sheet-outcomes-for-young-black-men/]
    50% of the murders in the country are committed by black men, who comprise only 6% of the total US population. NEVER talks about, but will spend endless hours race baiting over a single case like Martin.
    Look at the murder rate in Chicago, his home town (and the perps)

    As a liberal myself, Jackson's race baiting and racial profiteering sickens me -- he only uses his racial politics to advance his own ego and fatten his wallet. He hasn't been a civil rights leader in decades in my opinion, he's a self serving jerk who actually promotes racism, a dependence culture and victim mentality. He's done more damage to the black community than good, but is such a smooth talker, his fans don't see it.

    --

    'The unexamined life is not worth living' - Socrates
  22. Re:What Jesse wants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Jesse Jackson is not a Black leader. He does not and never has spoken for Black people. He is self serving and always has been.
    However!
    As one of the few Black men in IT, I have to say it is prejudicial almost every time I interview for a position. I have over 15 years in IT. I have done Software Engineering; SQA Engineering; Systems Engineering and Technical Project Management. There have been questions of my ability to do what is on my resume that are legit. But I have had more than a few instances where it was obvious to me that the questions "all of a sudden" take a weird turn. I applied for a Systems Admin position, did really well on the phone technical screen. Came in for a face to face and things took a turn. Under the guise of "I just want to see how you think" questions that are usually asked to potential Software Developers are being asked. I handled the questions with ease (a good education AND experience as a Developer). The surprise on the face of interviewer was disheartening. I knew what was being attempted. So now questions like, "How does one measure the amount of water passing a particular point in a river?" or "Why can you not see the Moon during the day?" are being asked. I've asked more than a few of my IT colleagues if they have had these situations and not one has. The assumption that all Blacks are from the "Inner City" "the ghetto" or "Urban" and lack education is so wrong. There are many of us that are twice as good and make half as much because of the Supremacist entitlement that pervades this culture.

  23. I sort of support what Jackson's saying, has merit by echtertyp · · Score: 4, Interesting
    As a white guy - born in Europe even! -- I can say that while working in Mountain View, California it was indeed overwhelmingly young, male, with mostly Northern European genes sloshing around. Some Asian but not as much as you'd think.

    That said our boss was quite a progressive guy and reached out to hire a black guy and several typical American women. The women were a disappointment. It has to be said that they proved to be demanding low performers. Had high expectations of everything and everyone else, but didn't really put points on the board for the team. In talks about the women I learned the US English codeword PITA, not the flat bread, but Pain In The A**. It was true.

    The black guy turned out well. In the first couple months he was very reserved and looking back I think he was very keen to not make mistakes or rub anyone the wrong way. But man, after that first 90 days or so, he relaxed and realized we weren't going to bite him, and he started learning the craft with real zeal. He was one of the hardest working fellows I ever met in my time in the U.S.

    I think the dynamic is that black people in the U.S. are all too accustomed to having "the prize" and opportunity dangled in front of them, and then snatched away once someone has got what they wanted from that black person. So they I think have learned to regard the larger American system with suspicion or at least much caution. However if they see by actions and not words that something is the real deal, the team is there and they are part of it, no bait and switch, they really get fired up and loving it.

  24. Re: RACIST! by Type44Q · · Score: 5, Insightful

    in there places

    Come now, that's hardly proper Ebonics; you've got the wrong pronunciation and spelling. :p

    On a more serious note, I'd never judge anyone by their skin color or ethnic background... but their behavior and cultural attitude, that's goddamned fair game. And I'm willing to bet that if you insist on "acting black," I'm not likely to find your abilities any more impressive than if you act like whitetrash or a dumb hick. Reality may be a bitch; what she isn't is a racist. ;)

  25. Re:Can't the Mods stop these racist rants? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah, and it would be awesome if he would do that, or if that were remotely his intent. But Jesse just wants SV companies to hire more black people. He doesn't care about the real reason there aren't a lot of black people in tech - he just wants to force companies to magically hire more black people regardless. Indians? Ageism? Yeah a real "Civil Rights Leader" should care about that, but I guarantee he does not...

  26. That's what a technical interview is by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 4, Informative

    There have been questions of my ability to do what is on my resume that are legit.

    I do a lot of technical interviewing, and that is the whole point of a technical interview, to verify that you actually do possess the skills that you have claimed to possess.

    It's not because you're black. It's because you're interviewing. I could tell so many stories of wild resume claims, you'd laugh.

    Here's one from today, for an interviewee who was an "expert in J2EE".

    Q: What are some different types of EJBs and how do they differ from one another?
    A: [uncomfortable silence].
    Q: Sorry, let's back up a bit. Tell me about your role in your last project that used J2EE.
    A: Uhh, I think I made a JSP once in college before I left to go work at a startup.

    As you might expect, his resume got filed away in the recycling bin.

    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  27. Re:RACIST! by craigminah · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Likewise, tech doesn't attract young black men and women because studying math, science, tech, and computers in school isn't cool. We need to make it cool so everyone gets an education worth a dam in our country. Until then, placing minorities in positions because they're a minority is doing a disservice to those who actually study and do well in school and it puts underqualified people in positions which weakens our tech fields. It all goes back to families then schools,