Slashdot Mirror


Jesse Jackson: Tech Diversity Is Next Civil Rights Step

theodp writes: U.S. civil rights leader Rev. Jesse Jackson called on the Obama administration Monday to scrutinize the tech industry's lack of diversity. "There's no talent shortage. There's an opportunity shortage," Jackson said, calling Silicon Valley "far worse" than many others, such as car makers that have been pressured by unions. He said tech behemoths have largely escaped scrutiny by a public dazzled with their cutting-edge gadgets. Jackson spoke to press after meeting with Labor Secretary Tom Perez for a review of H-1B visas, arguing that data show Americans have the skills and should have first access to high-paying tech work. Jackson's Rainbow Push Coalition plans to file a freedom-of-information request next month with the EEOC to acquire employment data for companies that have not yet disclosed it publicly, which includes Amazon, Broadcom, Oracle, Qualcomm and Yelp. Unlike the Dept. of Labor, Jackson isn't buying Silicon Valley's argument that minority hiring statistics are trade secrets. Five years after Google's HR Chief would only reassure Congress the company had "a very strong internal Black Googler Network" and its CEO brushed off similar questions about its diversity numbers by saying "we're pretty happy with the way our recruiting work," Google — under pressure from Jackson — fessed up to having a tech workforce that's only 1% Black, apparently par for the course in Silicon Valley.

292 of 514 comments (clear)

  1. Silicon Valley shakedown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Follow the money.

  2. Stop the idiocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Step #1 would be for not allowing people to look down on those who are smarter. Way too many people in the USA make it a point of pride that they are dumb.

    1. Re:Stop the idiocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Preach it brother, freedom ain't free.

    2. Re:Stop the idiocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      people

      Way too many people avoid naming names when dealing with race, even in stories that directly cite "black." It's urban black culture that disparages intellect.

      If we're going to talk race then lets talk race. Lets talk about how few blacks are employed in tech, and lets talk about why so few blacks are actually employable in tech.

    3. Re: Stop the idiocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I interviewed someone today who had a 3 year degree in electronic engineering. He did not know Ohm's law.

    4. Re: Stop the idiocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ohm's law is handled on 4th year.

    5. Re:Stop the idiocracy by geminidomino · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's urban black culture that disparages intellect.

      It's hardly limited to that.

      * The 20% of the country's land area called "the bible belt", especially the more rural chunks of it fit neatly into that box.

      * Enough of the boob-tube watching population that it's a trope second only to "oafish husband-father/long-suffering wife-mother."

      * All of Washington DC.

    6. Re: Stop the idiocracy by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      A three year degree in 'electronic engineering' means it wasn't someone with an Electrical Engineering degree from an accredited college. Since degrees are either two or four year, it also means that dude probably took three years to complete the two year Associate's degree.

    7. Re: Stop the idiocracy by BonThomme · · Score: 1

      probably because it was electronic engineering...

    8. Re: Stop the idiocracy by EvilJoker · · Score: 1

      Degrees are not always 2 or 4 years (or 6, or 7), but can vary by degree. While the usual EE degree is normally a 4-year Bachelor's program, that is not always the case.

      Most likely, you are correct, the Electronic Engineering degree is not the EE degree the parent expected.

    9. Re: Stop the idiocracy by Quirkz · · Score: 4, Funny

      Something about resistance is futile, right? Or is that Borg's law?

    10. Re: Stop the idiocracy by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      Or he's from Quebec, and he's got an 11th grade primary education and some sort of 2+ year degree there...

    11. Re: Stop the idiocracy by imatter · · Score: 1

      I have met plenty of people who claim to have gone to college for this or that because they took some electives at a junior college that had something to do with the major they were claiming they were there for.

      I would think that the "electronic engineering" would have given it away though. I don't know any EEs that call it electronic engineering.

    12. Re:Stop the idiocracy by Narcocide · · Score: 2

      This shouldn't be considered flamebait. He's absolutely right. Black culture isn't the only culture that disparages intellect. Corporate culture and rural religious culture also both disparage it quite vehemently. Don't get me wrong though, ... at least if you're white you don't ALSO have to contend against the racism prevalent in both cultures...

    13. Re:Stop the idiocracy by hey! · · Score: 1

      It's urban black culture that disparages intellect.

      I'd be interested in your source for this particular tidbit, particularly how it shows blacks are any worse than whites in this regard.

      I went to high school with a lot of tough white guys from South Boston and Charlestown in Boston, back when Whitey Bulger was still a big deal in Southie. Let me tell you most of them didn't see intellect as their path into the middle class. A few did, but not many. I've also worked with PhD scientists who were black and came from urban black neighborhoods. You get a mix of attitudes everywhere, whether it's in a black ghetto or white ghetto or a middle-class white neighborhood, but usually being academically advanced doesn't make you popular unless you live in town with a big Jewish population.

      Speaking of Whitey, his people used to spread the myth that he kept drugs off the street in Southie. In fact he was kicking the Italian mob out of Southie so he could have the drug trade all to himself. Whitey wasn't a hero, he was a parasite. So why did people believe the lie? Wishful thinking. The people who got education and became professionals moved out of the neighborhood, so the one example of guys who rose in life that you saw every day were the mob. And you had to hope they were good lads at heart, because they had the neighborhood by the balls.

      There's often a "we're all in this together" thing going on in poor, downtrodden neighborhoods. Part of that is a resentment of anyone who acts like their above the rest, and that includes people who flaunt their education or sophistication. But that's because intellectual accomplishments don't seem to be within the reach of everybody. You don't get that attitude in cultures which believe in self-improvement.

      So let's *not* talk race. Let's talk education and economic opportunity. If people have a way up, see that way, and believe they can do it, they will rise.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    14. Re:Stop the idiocracy by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 2

      I don't even know how you could show that even if it were true. It's not exactly the most objective of claims.

      When I was in college I did witness a tour group of middle school (I'm guessing) aged kids that were almost all black, and when the tour guide (who was trying to get them interested in attending college) asked them what they wanted to do as a profession, all the boys answered either "basketball player" or "rapper". The girls' answers were more varied.

      When I see this kind of thing, I am usually the first to point out that this is probably more to do with poverty than skin color, but the fact remains that there is still a high correlation between poverty and skin color. So whether you want to call it "black culture" or the black version of the general culture of poverty, the end result is still that a disproportionately high number of black kids are not being brought up in a culture that respects intellect (At least not the kind that results in interest in science and engineering).

      I don't know if lack of education is causing a culture of ignorance, or whether a culture of ignorance is causing a lack of education, but I suspect it's a positive feedback loop, and I don't have a good answer for how to fix it, other than suggesting that ignoring this problem, and pretending that everybody is equally likely to be qualified regardless of race and the only problem is racism, is probably not going to do anybody any good.

      I don't want to discount the effect of racism, but I don't think it's the only problem.

      So let's *not* talk race. Let's talk education and economic opportunity. If people have a way up, see that way, and believe they can do it, they will rise.

      I agree, but I think this trick of picking yourself up by the bootstraps is easier said than done. I know I have had a lot of advantages that others probably didn't (i.e. parents that had a good education, and forced my siblings and I to get a good education), and that's something that's pretty hard to create out of nothing.

      Who knows, maybe I'm wrong. Maybe "fake it till you make it" is as good a strategy as any.

    15. Re: Stop the idiocracy by Boronx · · Score: 1

      I interviewed someone who had a four year degree in EE, had five years of work experience, and didn't know what a diode did. We hired him. He's white.

    16. Re: Stop the idiocracy by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      ugh.. V=IR is handled in highschool these days, in physics.

    17. Re:Stop the idiocracy by Boronx · · Score: 1

      "So let's *not* talk race. Let's talk education and economic opportunity. If people have a way up, see that way, and believe they can do it, they will rise."

      Maybe, but you take a white kid who sees a path up through education takes it, graduates, applies for job, and his competition is a black guy who did the same thing, more likely than not, it's the white guy who gets a job.

      Something I found out only yesterday. After the 2008 crash, unemployment for black college grads jumped to 8%, but for white college grads it only went to 4%.

    18. Re:Stop the idiocracy by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      people

      Way too many people avoid naming names when dealing with race, even in stories that directly cite "black." It's urban black culture that disparages intellect.

      No, they are by far not the only ones to disparage intellect. Basically, anyone who is not intellectual, competes with intellectuals, or whose goals are opposed by intellectuals, are likely to disparage intellectuals because it is advantageous to them to do so (odds are, they do this without knowing the reason but rather because that is what their group does). In the case of people who are not intellectual, they have the further reason that they inherently devalue intellectual pursuits as demonstrated by their own choice (or resentment, if it was not their choice).

      Just to give a racially biased example, Republicans tend to be rich, white, and to disparage intellectuals. Democrats will disparage intellectuals only on a case-by-case basis of those who's opinions or scientific results are "wrong", while being generally supportive of intellectuals. Groups such as a class where the bottom percentage would fail had the seemingly ironic quality of being extremely viscous and mocking of high achievers, while trying their hardest to be one. And all kinds of other groups of various races are disparaging of intellectuals.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    19. Re:Stop the idiocracy by myth24601 · · Score: 1

      Did the study take majors and school into account? If the black college grad population has a much higher percentage of degrees in social sciences versus technical degrees, that could be a part of the difference. It is likely that a large percentage of blacks got degrees from less prestigious black colleges compared to whites.

      Just a couple of factors that could account for some of the gap.

      --
      No matter where you go, there you are.
  3. He just doesent' get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Tech isn't about equal rights. It's about if you are smart enough to get it done.

    If there isn't a minority in there they are not smart enough.

    It's bad enough we have to deal with the Indians and Chinese with their H1B Visas and working practically for free, the last thing we need to do is be forced
    to work with someone who can't carry their own weight.

    1. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Tech isn't about equal rights. It's about if you are smart enough to get it done.

      Ah, yes. The good ol' meritocracy. The dream of capable men and women everywhere. No more having to put up with coworkers that are incapable of doing the work. Just like not a single profession anywhere, ever. (Except maybe prostitution, but even that could be up for debate.) The fact is, being smart has very little to do with it. Getting the job done is what matters.

      If there isn't a minority in there they are not smart enough.

      You think. Or maybe there's racism in areas that aren't directly part of the job, but are part of getting the job. Like education (check) or HR (check). Of course, then it needs to be said that Mr. Jackson needs to focus his efforts elsewhere, and there's just not any money in that, so good luck.

      It's bad enough we have to deal with the Indians and Chinese with their H1B Visas and working practically for free, the last thing we need to do is be forced to work with someone who can't carry their own weight.

      We already have to work with those that can't carry their own weight. I've worked with plenty of Indians, and fully half of them were below average. The other half were good enough to get their work done (which is what matters). I've never worked with any Chinese. But of the mix of white and black (yes, black!) people I've worked with, there was always only a 50/50 chance of any single person being good at their job. These people were from various nationalities and environments. Some had years of experience, others were so green they needed mowing. And they were always a mixed bag. 50/50 is about the best you can hope for.

    2. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I've worked with plenty of Indians, and fully half of them were below average.

      I know, right? And 40% of the days they take off are either Mondays or Fridays.

    3. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by ilsaloving · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How is this modded insightful? It's complete and utter bullshit.

      Overseas workers work cheaper, and put up with more crap than domestic workers. It has nothing at all to do with skill level... it never did. It's pure corporate greed.

    4. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by metlin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As an Indian American, while I agree with the spirit of your comment, please remember that we are just as badly affected by the H1B visas as any other Americans.

      Unfortunately, we are all cast in the same light, our background, academic qualifications, or experience notwithstanding.

    5. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by MindStalker · · Score: 4, Informative

      http://www.nber.org/digest/sep...

      The National Bureau of Economic Research sent out 5,000 resumes to 1,300 jobs randomly assigning black or white sounding names to the resumes. The black sounding names received 50% less callbacks than the white sounding names.

    6. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by jxander · · Score: 1

      Source?

      Sounds like an interesting study. I'd be interested in reading it.

      --
      This signature is false.
    7. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Then it's easy. Don't use black sounding names.

    8. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by mythosaz · · Score: 3, Funny

      Did they also receive 50% fewer callbacks, or were the callbacks they received only of poorer quality?

    9. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      This is BS. Human beings still do the hiring, not impartial computers. Humans like to hire humans that are like them; similar personalities for sure, but also similar races, same gender, same schools, same religion, people who dress similarly, and so forth. Maybe it's not overt but humans have bias, even geeks.

      Meritocracy is just another way to maintain the status quo, and ignores that there are real problems preventing people outside of the privileged groups from getting the necessary education.

    10. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by worldthinker · · Score: 1

      If you can't even get an interview then it isn't about smarts is it?

    11. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      This is a false dichotomy. It's not that there is either only stereotyping, or only real differences in qualifications. It's probably both. In fact the stereotypes and lack of qualified applicants of certain types probably feed off eachother.

      I don't expect qualified tech applicants to look like a perfect cross section of society, any more than I would expect the USA to win the world cup. It's not that the world cup was rigged. We are just not as good at soccer (yet).

    12. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by Sarius64 · · Score: 1

      One of my best friends is American-born of Indian ethnicity and his parents immigrated legally way before there were H1B Visas. Last I heard he was the lead developer for a $600 million project. He certainly didn't get position through AA.

    13. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      http://www.nber.org/digest/sep...

      The National Bureau of Economic Research sent out 5,000 resumes to 1,300 jobs randomly assigning black or white sounding names to the resumes. The black sounding names received 50% less callbacks than the white sounding names.

      So is "Jesse" a black sounding or white sounding name? What about "Malcolm" or "Martin"? (Just borrowing the names of three of the most famous black civil rights activists as examples.) Or in order to be "black sounding" does a name have to also indicate a socio-economic status (which will also inevitably conveniently conflate your results)?

    14. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Tech isn't about equal rights. It's about if you are smart enough to get it done.

      That's the fucking definition of equal rights.

      If there isn't a minority in there they are not smart enough.

      Ah the old *ism doesn't exist because I say so argument.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    15. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by stdarg · · Score: 1

      Tech isn't about equal rights. It's about if you are smart enough to get it done.

      That's the fucking definition of equal rights.

      Not anymore... there's a big confusion over equal opportunity vs equal outcome. Conservatives typically believe in equal opportunity, liberals mostly believe in equal opportunity with some leanings towards equal outcome (that is the justification for affirmative action).

      If you don't believe me, look up the legal terms "disparate impact" and "unintentional discrimination."

      Another example is from a few years ago in the height of the financial crisis. When banks tightened credit requirements for loans, there was disparate impact against blacks. Same standards being applied to everyone, but blacks were affected more. Apparently that is racist, e.g. http://racism.org/index.php?op... says

      In a recent article, attorneys at K&L Gates asserted "even the most basic lending standards, such as credit scores and [loan-to-value] requirements, impact' racial and ethnic groups differently." While some in the financial industry have recently discussed the existence of the disparate-impact theory under the Fair Housing Act and other long-established laws, all eleven circuit courts that have considered the matter recognized disparate impact as a legally acceptable means by which parties can assert claims under the Act.

    16. Re:He just doesent' get it.. by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Not anymore... there's a big confusion over equal opportunity vs equal outcome. Conservatives typically believe in equal opportunity, liberals mostly believe in equal opportunity with some leanings towards equal outcome (that is the justification for affirmative action).

      Well that's the thing. Conservatives like to believe we already have equal opportunity and the disparity is just due to the intake. They use that to dismiss affermative action.

      The fact remains there is not equal *opportnity*. Affermative action does help to correct that.

      There was an article here posted about CVs in some context (academic?). The CVs were of course made up allowing the researchers to perfectly control for the content. CVs attached to "black" sounding names were consistently rated worse.

      That means they were not being given equal opportunity.

      Affermative action corrects for that.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  4. Experience outside the valley by Whorhay · · Score: 4, Informative

    I can't speak for what it is like in Silicon Valley but where I work in the deep south I would estimate that at least 30% of my fellow tech workers are of African ancestry.

    1. Re:Experience outside the valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can't speak for what it is like in Silicon Valley but where I work in the deep south I would estimate that at least 30% of my fellow tech workers are of African ancestry.

      This seems to only happen in a government setting. Am I right?

    2. Re:Experience outside the valley by tofu2go · · Score: 2

      Might have something to do with the fact that the African American population is greater in the south than anywhere else in the United States. In Louisiana and Georgia for example the African American population is around 30%. In California, African Americans make up only about 6% of the total population. Perhaps the demographic of the local workforce is a reflection of the local population?

    3. Re:Experience outside the valley by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      Yeah, so I hope and expect Jesse Jackson to really kick off and promote the workforce equality such that it is truly representative of the local population's ethnic ratio.

      If that means more white workers have to be hired then I expect him to be promoting more white guys.... won't hold my breath waiting for that to happen though!

    4. Re:Experience outside the valley by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      In the firmware development group I work in we actually have a good amount of diversity.
      We will hire anyone with talent.
      The lack of opportunity is not in the hiring area. It is in the home and education. Hiring someone because of race is bigotry. I doesn't matter if the race happens to be anglo or african descent.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    5. Re:Experience outside the valley by jythie · · Score: 1

      It does tend to be a somewhat localized effect. Generally any particular community tends to hire and retain people like themselves, so places that have reasonably good representation tend to maintain it, while places where it is bad tend to resist shifting it. The lack of blacks or women in the local developer community is taken as proof that such people are generally not fit to work in tech and when viewing candidates or new hires through that lens creates a self fulfilling prophecy.

    6. Re:Experience outside the valley by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for what it is like in Silicon Valley but where I work in the deep south I would estimate that at least 30% of my fellow tech workers are of African ancestry.

      Obviously, the rest of them came from Asia, right? :D

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    7. Re:Experience outside the valley by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Based on what? I could say that you see it because the government is a bastion of political correctness where people are chosen based on quotas rather than on experience, and the statement would have the same validity.

    8. Re:Experience outside the valley by ruir · · Score: 1

      Might it well be that there are quotas. Having lived and worked in Africa for almost a decade, I think quotas are evil, in more than a couple of ways. It is really hard to have to choose people based on their race, than on competence.

    9. Re:Experience outside the valley by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I could say that you see it because the government is a bastion of political correctness where people are chosen based on quotas rather than on experience

      You could say you're Superman too, but that won't give you x-ray vision.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    10. Re:Experience outside the valley by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      So if it's a representation of the community, why would you believe it has anything to do with affirmative action? The "point" of the GPP was that black people are "takin' ar jerbs".

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  5. Confusing position by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm confused... is Jackson arguing for more Americans, or more black people, or more black Americans, to get tech jobs?

    After listening to Jackson over the years, it's now almost a reflex for me to argue against his statements. But I'm still sketchy on what they are in this case.

    1. Re:Confusing position by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There is no confusion, that racist is arguing specifically for black people. Not Americans in general or anything else. Instead of trying to get the government to lay down yet more regulations, he should really reach out to his communities and educate the vast majority of black people so they can get these tech jobs. The majority of black people live in low income areas and rarely ever leave. He needs to stop asking for handouts and actually start helping the people he claims to be helping.

    2. Re:Confusing position by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      >> is Jackson arguing for more Americans, or more black people, or more black Americans, to get tech jobs?

      Whatever gets him paid.

      http://www.solargeneral.com/jeffs-archive/black-civil-wrongs/jesse-shakedown-jackson-gets-beer-distributorship-for-son/

    3. Re:Confusing position by DigiShaman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Reverse discrimination. Jesse Jackson is putting race, not skill level, as the priority imputes to employ more blacks. In his world view, society must bend over backwards to cater to the African American.

      Hey Jesse!!! Yeah you. They don't want to be an Uncle Tom. The idea of "white" culture (a culture of being educated and the further pursuit thereof) is what may of the blacks are against. Those that you represent value ignorance over everything else. For them, they derive power through victimization; and the liberal society is all to willing to go along with the coddle-fication of victimization attitude!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    4. Re:Confusing position by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 5, Informative

      Reverse discrimination.

      Sorry, but discrimination is discrimination. There is no direction. It either takes place or it doesn't. Using the term reverse gives advantage and power to one group over another.

      --
      There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
    5. Re:Confusing position by Nidi62 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Reverse discrimination.

      Sorry, but discrimination is discrimination. There is no direction. It either takes place or it doesn't. Using the term reverse gives advantage and power to one group over another.

      So would you argue that affirmative action and hiring/acceptance quotas are discrimination since they put a higher value on some races than they do others?

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    6. Re:Confusing position by CanHasDIY · · Score: 4, Insightful

      His arguments are, "pay attention to me so I can use the plight of African-Americans to fatten my own bank account."

      In fact, that's the only argument he and Sharpton have ever had. I pray, when they die, the ghost of MLK spends eternity bitch-slapping the both of them day in and day out.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    7. Re:Confusing position by Nidi62 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I pray, when they die, the ghost of MLK spends eternity bitch-slapping the both of them day in and day out.

      I think MLK is going to be too busy spanking his kids for eternity after the way they've fought over and tarnished his legacy these past few decades.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    8. Re:Confusing position by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So would you argue that affirmative action and hiring/acceptance quotas are discrimination since they put a higher value on some races than they do others?

      It can be. Sometimes it is called possitive discrimination. However, I think you misunderstand what affirmative action law actually requires employers to do in the United States. It does not require quotas. Infact, quotas are illegal.

    9. Re:Confusing position by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 1

      Reverse discrimination.

      Sorry, but discrimination is discrimination. There is no direction. It either takes place or it doesn't. Using the term reverse gives advantage and power to one group over another.

      So would you argue that affirmative action and hiring/acceptance quotas are discrimination since they put a higher value on some races than they do others?

      At some point they become discrimination and defeatist in nature to everyone involved with society. But I am also a realist, and understand that at one point there was a need to have these practices in place in the U.S. And I think that they will still exist in some form or another, but not enforced. There are many industries in the US who's work force is not diversified at all or are becoming of one particular background.

        What is a proper percentage of bodies of a particular ethnic background/gender/sexual preference/religious preference is a company to have? Is it guided by local community, state community, country population, or world population?

      Frankly, I could care less. This is still the U.S. and if you can't work for someone, go start your own business and fight for your business. Life is not fair. The sooner you accept that and move on, the happier you will be.

      --
      There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
    10. Re:Confusing position by the+phantom · · Score: 1

      So would you argue that affirmative action and hiring/acceptance quotas are discrimination...

      No and yes (in that order).

      The executive orders that comprise the basis of affirmative action order government agencies and contractors (1) not discriminate in hiring on the basis of race, religion, national origin, or sex and (2) to collect data in order to understand if their hiring practices are leading to over- or under-representation of certain groups, determine why that discrimination exists, and fix the problem if possible. The whole point of affirmative action is to take steps to *stop* discrimination on the basis on the basis of certain criteria that should be irrelevant (such as, again, race, religion, national origin, or sex) not to intentionally discriminate on these bases in order to rectify some historic inequality.

      Quotas are inherently discriminatory.

    11. Re:Confusing position by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I liked how you put that, can be read multiple ways...

      Half-black man or Black Half-man - interesting concept... or is it Half-Black Half-man - perhaps we already have the first hermaphroditic president and nobody knows it.

    12. Re:Confusing position by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Economy recovering? Check
      Debt going (way) down? Check
      Pulling out of wars? Check
      Health care for all? Check

      I'm sorry, while you may feel that this president has failed and that all sorts of bad things are his fauly those of us who are a little more objective disagree. I know that it's in vogue to bash the guy but try thinking a little bit for yourself please....

      P.S. I did vote for the guy, he seemed way better than the other guy who thought strapping an open dog carrier to the roof of his car was "okay" among other things. When I pulled that lever I didn't give two shits what color he was and I still don't. Watching the Repub antics I'm glad I did!

    13. Re:Confusing position by jxander · · Score: 2

      While true, reverse- just indicates that it's opposite of the norm.

      When Mega-Maid went from suck to blow, it could be characterized as reverse-flow. But really, there's no such thing. Flow is flow.

      --
      This signature is false.
    14. Re:Confusing position by jeIIomizer · · Score: 2

      Continuing and even sometimes expanding the egregious violations of the constitution and people's fundamental liberties of the last administration and all his buddies in congress? Check. P.S. I did vote for the guy, he seemed way better than the other guy who thought strapping an open dog carrier to the roof of his car was "okay" among other things

      You are the problem. You and your ilk only ensure that candidates from The One Party win time and time again. Both parties are filled with evil scumbags, and voting for either of them is the same as supporting all the various constitutional and rights violations that these people advocate. Voting for 'the lesser of two evils' is simply a self-fulfilling prophecy; third parties won't win because they won't win because assholes like you won't throw away your irrational fear of wasting your vote and just vote for them. They don't even need to win; getting a significant number of votes will send a message to candidates from The One Party.

      Regardless of any of that, voting for evil scumbags should make anyone with any sort of principles and a love for freedom want to vomit.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    15. Re:Confusing position by Feyshtey · · Score: 1

      Then by your definitions, the current federal hiring practices are discriminatory. If you're applying for a position in federal govt you get additional preference for that position if you are female and/or a member of a minority. All else being equal, a woman, or a member of a minority, or a minority woman will be hired for a position that an exactly equally qualified white male also applied to. (Veteran status is another factor, which I actually happen to agree with. But that's a different discussion.)

      --
      "But we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it,..." - Nancy Pelosi
    16. Re:Confusing position by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Economy Recovering (For Wall Street, mainstreet still at unacceptable unemployment)
      Debt Going down (Sequestration, in spite of horrors by Liberals about "government shutdown')
      Pulling out of wars (while Russia invades multiple countries annexing them at will, Hamas/Israel, Syria, Libya, Iraq ..... )
      Health Care for all (Not watching the news about Federal Case regarding Fed Exchange ...)

      How about Open Boarder Invasion from the south, causing massive harm to the environmentally threatened South West? (Check)
      IRS Lying in attacks against conservatives (check, check, check and ... "Not a smidgeon of corruption" .. check)
      Support of Islam at every step, while ignoring the plight of Christians (and others) world wide. (check)
      Golfing and fundraising instead of actually doing his job (Check)
      Another Multimillion dollar Vacation (check)

      And the "other guy" (Romney) was mocked for saying exactly what is happening today in Ukraine. Obama is the pigeon on the chessboard of the world, strutting around knocking pieces over.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    17. Re:Confusing position by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      I am a Libertarian. I haven't voted for a "winning" candidate in a very very long time. You talk about the "one party" yet vote for them. You are the problem because you're a hypocrite.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    18. Re:Confusing position by the+phantom · · Score: 1

      Then by your definitions, the current federal hiring practices are discriminatory.

      First, those are not my definitions. Those are the definitions in law, as per executive orders 10925 and 11246 (the orders establishing affirmative action). It is a clever rhetorical trick to imply that the person to whom you are responding is using some wacky definition out of left-field, but it is kind of dishonest.

      Second, I did not claim that federal hiring practices were non-discriminatory. What I claimed is that affirmative action is non-discriminatory, as it specifically claims to be about ending discrimination, in large part through the collection of data about hiring practices.

      Finally, can you prove (or even provide solid evidence) of your claim that federal hiring practices are discriminatory? I don't claim to be an expert, and I would be willing to believe that such discrimination exists were you (or someone else) to provide evidence of such. That being said, your evidence would have to run counter both to my own experience and the stated policies of the federal government.

      For my own experience, I did seasonal work for the BLM and Forest Service a decade ago, and the stated hiring policy was not to discriminate on the basis of race, religion, etc. In fact, USAJobs doesn't necessarily collect demographic information aside from status as a veteran and some information about disabilities. I can't speak from personal experience regarding the practices of contractors, but they are supposed to be held to the same standard.

      Beyond my own anecdotes, the Department of Labor states that their policy is not to discriminate except to give veterans preference and to "... take affirmative steps to employ qualified individuals with disabilities." ([1], emphasis mine). Other relevant laws and regulations can be found on the Department of Labor's website, including the following which relate to equal opportunity employment: [2] and [3] (relating to executive order 11246, the current law-of-the-land regarding affirmative action), and [4] (relating to the preference given to veterans).

    19. Re:Confusing position by jeIIomizer · · Score: 1

      No, I don't vote for either republicans or democrats. What made you think that I do, given what I said?

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    20. Re:Confusing position by jeIIomizer · · Score: 1

      "P.S. I did vote for the guy, he seemed way better than the other guy who thought strapping an open dog carrier to the roof of his car was "okay" among other things"

      If it was that, well, that was supposed to be a quote.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    21. Re:Confusing position by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Jesse Jackson is putting race, not skill level, as the priority imputes to employ more blacks.

      No he isn't. He is saying that black people need more opportunities to get those jobs, i.e. more access to training that is lacking in the areas where many black people live. Rather than going after H1B visas the tech companies should be trying to bring better education to parts of America that are not well served, but there is a lot of stigma associated with them that prevents it happening.

      You are projecting your own feeling of persecution onto what it he says, rather than paying attention to what he actually said.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    22. Re:Confusing position by c · · Score: 1

      I pray, when they die, the ghost of MLK spends eternity bitch-slapping the both of them day in and day out.

      I'm pretty sure they're going to a different place than MLK.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    23. Re:Confusing position by thejynxed · · Score: 1

      They're illegal, but happen all of the time anyhow. It's only a matter of getting caught or not.

      --
      @Mindless Drivel: 100% of Twitter posts ever Tweeted.
    24. Re:Confusing position by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      I pray, when they die, the ghost of MLK spends eternity bitch-slapping the both of them day in and day out.

      You heard it here first, CanHasDIY is advocating that MLK go to Hell and/or that the devils' jobs be outsourced to black people.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    25. Re: Confusing position by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      While I admit that it's a bit of a chicken / egg problem, there's no reason for an African American to not get both the training and education required to land an interview and do the job.

      As with all the race-baiters and those that fall for their BS, he's conflating race and culture. I still contend that as with women in IT, African Americans don't want to be a part of the IT culture too. So why force the issue as a corporate responsibility? That's the underlaying issue I have with his message.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    26. Re:Confusing position by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      I pray, when they die, the ghost of MLK spends eternity bitch-slapping the both of them day in and day out.

      You heard it here first, CanHasDIY is advocating that MLK go to Hell and/or that the devils' jobs be outsourced to black people.

      Lol, that cracked me up!

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    27. Re:Confusing position by marvinglenn · · Score: 1

      Reverse discrimination.

      Sorry, but discrimination is discrimination. There is no direction. It either takes place or it doesn't. Using the term reverse gives advantage and power to one group over another.

      The modifier reverse implies that it's discrimination that's purported to be done for the purpose of correcting discrimination. It does not give any more advantage to one group, at least anymore than the original discrimination.

      --
      The whores get mad when the sluts give it away for free.
    28. Re:Confusing position by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      It was that. Sorry.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  6. Here we go again..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    We need to stop teaching people that their skills and abilities matter and that the color of their skin is what is important right? That'll get rid of racism right? Effing liberals.

  7. Probably going to get flamed for this by TJ_Phazerhacki · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But I have a hard time referring to Rev. Jackson by the titular "US Civil Rights Leader" when in fact, he is most widely known for promoting the civil rights of a specific minority. Also, and again, I don't like where this is going. Hiring should be based on qualification of skill, and NOTHING else. Trying to make up for inequality of upbringing by arbitrating diversity standards is as stupid today as it was 20 years ago.

    --
    Physics is nothing like religion. If it was, we'd have an easier time trying to raise money!
    1. Re:Probably going to get flamed for this by powerlord · · Score: 2

      I would hope its mostly disparity of education and experience.

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    2. Re:Probably going to get flamed for this by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Absolutely. And if only 1% of your staff is black you've got to suspect that something else is already in play...

      Starting with "how many African Americans have an education in tech?".

      When I went to university, I do not remember a single black person in my courses. Since then, I've known only a handful in tech.

      I've known and worked with Chinese, Vietnamese, Korean, Indian, Sri Lankan, Nepalese, Czech, Russian, Australian, Egyptian, Pakistani, Turkish and pretty much every other nationality I can think of -- which makes for awesome company pot lucks.

      And, for reasons I cannot even begin to explain, the only blacks/African Americans I've met have been what I'd call "recently African" (ie. first generation immigrants).

      I have never known anybody who refused to hire a qualified black candidate. But, in my experience (which admittedly doesn't cover everything), there's simply not many applicants.

      So, the question to ask is: do blacks, as a group, even go into tech? Are they self excluding from the profession? Is the education system failing to get them into it?

      I don't think it's so much that people are excluding anybody, it's that you can only include people who come to the game.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:Probably going to get flamed for this by digitalPhant0m · · Score: 1
    4. Re:Probably going to get flamed for this by starslash · · Score: 1

      And, for reasons I cannot even begin to explain, the only blacks/African Americans I've met have been what I'd call "recently African" (ie. first generation immigrants).

      Immigrating to the US to become African? I cant explain that either..

    5. Re:Probably going to get flamed for this by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Immigrating to the US to become African? I cant explain that either..

      Posting the same stupid comment as both your own account and AC, also inexplicable.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  8. right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    barack obama has proven once and for all there are no white people holding blacks back from anything. jesse jackson is just a failed attempt at maintaining the racial divide in the US. it is not white responsibility to make sure these various colors of people get ahead in our country. all they have to do is exactly how us responsible do; get your shit together, dont let crack or a joint distract you from your long term goals. no more excuses. and stop emulating people like snoop dog and others that brag abt drugs.

    nothing is keeping you in 'the hood'. i am dirt poor and have lived in a middle-class neighborhood for over 30yrs. i rent a tiny one bedroom apt in a rental house, and im disabled. yes, i get less than 1k/mo, just like most of the blacks out there whining abt 'i only make min wage'. shut up, i have less income than you. just get your shit together n stay out of my hood.

  9. Is Jackson arguing against diversity? by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 4, Informative

    He seems convinced that the tech companies with the fewest black developers make the most amazing products.

    It seems he's basically arguing that there's a correlation (and therefore maybe causality) between being diverse and not leading the market.

    1. Re:Is Jackson arguing against diversity? by sandytaru · · Score: 2

      I thought he was arguing against HB1 visas that import foreign workers instead of trying to hire more diverse American workers.

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    2. Re:Is Jackson arguing against diversity? by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      I thought he was arguing against HB1 visas that import foreign workers instead of trying to hire more diverse American workers.

      That's my best guess too. What if those workers are black? Or black and from impoverished countries? I'm curious if a liberal Democrat can bring himself to say "Americans first."

    3. Re:Is Jackson arguing against diversity? by DamnOregonian · · Score: 2

      Americans first.

    4. Re:Is Jackson arguing against diversity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What if those workers are black? Or black and from impoverished countries?

      No. Africans are generally successful people in America, and don't think very much of Black Americans, in general. Since Africans are not profitable for Jesse Jackson, he isn't interested in "helping" them.

    5. Re:Is Jackson arguing against diversity? by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      I'm a Democrat. Americans first. Also: the second amendment guarantees a personal right to bear arms. Also, also: bring back public executions.

      This guy should be head of the GOP

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    6. Re:Is Jackson arguing against diversity? by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      It seems he's basically arguing that there's a correlation (and therefore maybe causality) between being diverse and not leading the market.

      Makes sense. Companies intent on "diversifying their workforce" are probably too focused on politics or appearances rather than paying attention to their products and customers.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    7. Re:Is Jackson arguing against diversity? by sandytaru · · Score: 1

      Chances are if someone is from an impoverished country and is trying to get a job in the American tech sector, they were either educated in America or another first world country at some point. India and China's tech education sectors are no joke, but part of the core of the HB1 visa problem is that they complete their education at home, head to the US to get some experience, then head back and take all that experience with them. Hiring American workers first would ensure all that industry experience stays here.

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    8. Re:Is Jackson arguing against diversity? by McFly777 · · Score: 1

      I'm a Democrat. Americans first. Also: the second amendment guarantees a personal right to bear arms. Also, also: bring back public executions.

      We're not all the pinko pansies you've been lead to believe.

      GRRRR... All the most interesting posts are ACs on this topic. I would ask why the above AC is voting Democrat, given his/her professed leanings. Not that the GOP is much different lately (unfortunately... or at least at the leadership level).

      --

      McFly777
      - - -
      "What do people mean when they say the computer went down on them?" -Marilyn Pittman
  10. The problem isn't color of one's skin... by hsthompson69 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...it's the content of one's culture.

    If Jesse wants more people with his skin color in the tech industry, he needs to get more of them into the proper culture.

    A thug mentality, and victimhood culture, does not succeed. A culture focused on academics, hard work, and personal responsibility does.

    1. Re:The problem isn't color of one's skin... by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      ...it's the content of one's culture.

      If Jesse wants more people with his skin color in the tech industry, he needs to get more of them into the proper culture.

      A thug mentality, and victimhood culture, does not succeed. A culture focused on academics, hard work, and personal responsibility does.

      Precisely right. I am proud of my niece's accomplishments. She took control of her life and decided to start making healthy life choices.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    2. Re:The problem isn't color of one's skin... by Whorhay · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree in general but that is not an absolute. We've seen ample evidence over the years of institutions like the police giving particular attention to black communities in a negative way. Simple possesion of an illegal narcotic is more likely to destroy your future job prospects as a young black man than if you belonged to any other ethnic group. And I don't know if that is because people of other ethnic groups treat them unfairly in the court system or if it is a self inflicted thing. I am always surprised by the extremely negative atitudes my succesful black co-workers have for any young black person who makes a poor decision. It's probably some mix of both those problems though.

  11. Jesse Jackson by asmkm22 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hard to take him seriously when he's basically made himself very wealthy by "advocating" for blacks. It's hard to find anything he's done in the last 30 years that has had any meaningful impact, beyond lining his own pocket. But that hasn't stopped him from taking the soap box every chance he can get, before moving onto whatever new crisis comes up -- often leaving his previous efforts hanging.

    1. Re:Jesse Jackson by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Hard to take him seriously

      A more accurate headline might be Jesse Jackson: Please, Pay Attention to Me!

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  12. The "equal opportunity" employees by mi · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Having an "equal opportunity" President is proving to be so popular, I can't wait for Mr. Jackson to be treated by an "equal opportunity" heart surgeon...

    fessed up to having a tech workforce that's only 1% Black, apparently par for the course in Silicon Valley.

    Not only is Silicon Valley young and Illiberal, they are also working on developing their businesses and would not sabotage their start-ups' success by turning away real talent.

    Whatever the problem is, Silicon Valley's "racism" ain't it...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  13. Good for him by roc97007 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    > Jackson spoke to press after meeting with Labor Secretary Tom Perez for a review of H-1B visas, arguing that data show Americans have the skills and should have first access to high-paying tech work.

    I usually find myself disagreeing with Jackson, but he seems to be on the right track here. I'm really hoping his involvement doesn't muddy the issue.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  14. Are only black people "diverse"? by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From a NYT article:

    Of Google’s technical staff, 60 percent are white, 1 percent are black, 2 percent are Hispanic, 34 percent are Asian and 3 percent are of two or more races.

    As I read it, America is about 63% non-Hispanic white. Which sounds pretty close to Google's proportion of white technical staff.

    It sounds like Jackson really needs to have a discussion as to why black people are being so out-hired by Asians.

    1. Re:Are only black people "diverse"? by Reason58 · · Score: 2

      It doesn't matter what percentage of the total population a race is if they aren't getting related degrees they won't be hired.

    2. Re:Are only black people "diverse"? by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      Isn't it obvious? Since any disparity with proportions in the general population can only mean some sort of deliberate discrimination, we are forced to conclude that Silicon Valley is unfairly biased in favor of Asian people.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    3. Re:Are only black people "diverse"? by digsbo · · Score: 2

      It doesn't matter what percentage of the total population a race is if they aren't sufficiently skilled they won't be hired.

      FTFY because I don't think giving dumbed-down degrees, a likely possible proposed solution, would really help.

    4. Re:Are only black people "diverse"? by fishybell · · Score: 1
      Comparing them to the US as a whole isn't particularly fair, as they're (in theory) mostly pulling local talent from California. California's demographics:
      • Racial composition - 2010
      • White - 57.6%
      • Asian - 13.1%
      • Black - 6.2%
      • Native - 1.0%
      • Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islander - 0.3% 0.4%
      • Other race - 17.0%
      • Two or more races - 4.9%

      So really, Google is more white and Asian and less "other" and black than the rest of California.

      --
      ><));>
    5. Re:Are only black people "diverse"? by Kojiro+Ganryu+Sasaki · · Score: 1

      Google is probably not an accurate representation of that employment market considering that it seems to me to be exactly the company that would make deliberate attempts to hire for diversity.

      Anyway. While the amount of whites seems fairly accurately representative of america as a whole, the proportions of non-whites is interesting.

      White (72%)
      African American (12%)
      Asian American (5%)

      Asians are grossly overrepresented and african americans are very underrepresented.

    6. Re:Are only black people "diverse"? by gandhi123 · · Score: 1

      "they're (in theory) mostly pulling local talent from California. "

      What theory are you referring to?

      Google recruits at prestigious colleges all around the country. You think Google isn't interested in hiring MIT grads because they aren't in California?

  15. What?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I saw him cry like a baby when Obama was elected..

    I kind of think he's for real.

    On the other hand, as someone who has worked with very gifted African-American developers (at least here in Metro-Atlanta)* and who was offered a lucrative position because of his talents (technical AND social - he was GREAT to work with!), I am not so sure that there is a problem on the employer's side based upon my sample of one with a standard deviation of nonsense.

    Oh! The '*' - we had a HUGE problem with our software. I was tasked with finding out WTF happened.

    It was me. I fucked up.

    Now, I was handed a GOLDEN opportunity to blame the black guy as Chris Rock would say.

    I told the lead, "It was my code. Let me fix I know what I did."

    Tech lead, "But it was something that [black guy's name] did to cause it, riiiight?"

    "Nope. It was me."

    "But there was something he did that made you think you needed to code it the way you did? Right?"

    A bit terse: "Nope"

    End of conversation.

    End of jobs from that contracting company too.

    Why did I do that? Because of my own sense of fairness, I really like the guy, and my own belief that talent and hard work should be rewarded and folks who make a mistake should have the opportunity to make it right and learn from it (that's me).

    I think I was done a favor. I love tech but I hate working in it.

  16. I don't see how Jackson isn't a racist.... by rat9 · · Score: 2

    I mean what he wants is tech companies to hire minorities because of their race right? Wouldn't it be more fair to be colorblind in the workplace and hire people according to skill?

    1. Re:I don't see how Jackson isn't a racist.... by Tharkkun · · Score: 1

      I mean what he wants is tech companies to hire minorities because of their race right? Wouldn't it be more fair to be colorblind in the workplace and hire people according to skill?

      Most tech companies do. What they may not have is more black/african american people. Big tech companies are rolling with individuals from china, asia, japan, india, russia and africa. But the majority of new highly skilled workers are coming from china and india.

    2. Re:I don't see how Jackson isn't a racist.... by blue9steel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wouldn't it be more fair to be colorblind in the workplace and hire people according to skill?

      There are two different schools of thought when it comes to solving racial inequity issues. Once school recommends that we strive towards colorblindness in decision making, the other school suggests that we deliberately take color into account but in a more positive way. The justification for the first school is that "two wrongs don't make a right". The justification for the second school is that "the situation won't resolve itself naturally". It's the whole equality of opportunity vs. equality of outcomes argument that tends to dominate our political discourse.

    3. Re:I don't see how Jackson isn't a racist.... by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      Skill is a social construct used by the white, heterosexual cis men to keep minorities down!

      What the hell does CIS mean?

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    4. Re:I don't see how Jackson isn't a racist.... by vbraga · · Score: 1

      Cisgender, the opposite of transgender.

      --
      English is not my first language. Corrections and suggestions are welcome.
    5. Re:I don't see how Jackson isn't a racist.... by Gryle · · Score: 2

      It means you identify as the same gender you were born with. "I'm a man who was born a man and thinks I'm a man" or "I'm a woman who was born a woman and thinks I'm a woman" as opposed to "I'm a woman who was born a woman and thinks I'm a man" or vice-versa.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
    6. Re:I don't see how Jackson isn't a racist.... by McFly777 · · Score: 1

      There are two different schools of thought when it comes to solving racial inequity issues. Once school recommends that we strive towards colorblindness in decision making, the other school suggests that we deliberately take color into account but in a more positive way.

      and what is "a more positive way" to practice racism?

      I guess you can say that I fall into that first school of thought.

      --

      McFly777
      - - -
      "What do people mean when they say the computer went down on them?" -Marilyn Pittman
    7. Re:I don't see how Jackson isn't a racist.... by blue9steel · · Score: 1

      and what is "a more positive way" to practice racism?

      I guess you can say that I fall into that first school of thought.

      It's important to acknowledge that there is another way of looking at it. From that perspective what matters is the fairness of the outcomes. So for example a company that has a colorblind hiring process but a significant racial imbalance would not be considered acceptable. That sort of reasoning leads to "restorative justice" policies like affirmative action. The basic idea is that previous unfairness must be compensated for by providing preferential treatment for the class of wronged individuals until the situation has be been rebalanced.

    8. Re:I don't see how Jackson isn't a racist.... by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      Cisgender, the opposite of transgender.

      Sorry, but I don't see the need for a new term for that. How about normal or not gender confused?

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    9. Re:I don't see how Jackson isn't a racist.... by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      It means you identify as the same gender you were born with. "I'm a man who was born a man and thinks I'm a man" or "I'm a woman who was born a woman and thinks I'm a woman" as opposed to "I'm a woman who was born a woman and thinks I'm a man" or vice-versa.

      When I was growing up, there was no term for that other than "normal". When what you describe is the norm, there is no need for a new term because it is assumed that you are that unless if you specify otherwise.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    10. Re:I don't see how Jackson isn't a racist.... by Gryle · · Score: 1

      Because "normal" implies transgendered individuals are somehow mutant or different (which they are) and therefore such a term is somehow prejudiced. (For the record, I agree with your assessment on the subject, I'm just explaining the reasoning behind the creation of such a term).

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
    11. Re:I don't see how Jackson isn't a racist.... by McFly777 · · Score: 1

      The basic idea is that previous unfairness must be compensated for by providing preferential treatment for the class of wronged individuals until the situation has be been rebalanced.

      But when is the situation ever rebalanced? or more correctly, who gets to say that it is rebalanced? (particularly given that there are significant parties who have a vested interest in the rebalancing never being considered complete.) Doesn't the preferential treatment for the wronged individuals tend to perpetuate the problem, even if it is at some lower level than the initial problem?

      It is somewhat like having a cast on a broken limb. The cast strengthens (by restraining) the limb so that it can heal, but if you never take the cast off, you still don't have use of the limb, and eventually you lose use of it due to atrophy.

      --

      McFly777
      - - -
      "What do people mean when they say the computer went down on them?" -Marilyn Pittman
    12. Re:I don't see how Jackson isn't a racist.... by blue9steel · · Score: 1

      My personal politics shade towards colorblindness, but in order to have an intelligent discourse about the problem I've made an effort to understand the other main point of view. Understanding the other sides argument doesn't mean I agree.

    13. Re:I don't see how Jackson isn't a racist.... by strikethree · · Score: 1

      There are two different schools of thought when it comes to solving racial inequity issues. Once school recommends that we strive towards colorblindness in decision making, the other school suggests that we deliberately take color into account but in a more positive way.

      When things are deeply out of whack, "positive" ("reverse" discrimination) force is needed. After the initial breakthrough occurs, it is better to use no force and allow things to occur more naturally (colorblindness) so the goal is not missed. The initial breakthrough has already happened. We should be striving for colorblindness.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
  17. Re:RACIST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Posting as A. C because you are afraid to face the Black Man.

    Comander Taco, Now is the time for a -1 RACIST moderation to put these peope in there places!

    And that's EXACLTY how the Jesse Jackson shakedown works.

    "Do what I say or I'll call you a RAAAAAACIST!!!"

    Jackson really should patent that. It's a hell of an effective "business" method.

  18. Location, location, location by sandytaru · · Score: 1

    I'd bet a dollar that the offices of tech companies outside of Silicon valley are a bit more diverse. What are the stats on offices in Atlanta, NYC, or Chicago? Not everyone is willing to move to the valley in pursuit of a six figure paycheck and 100 hour work week.

    --
    Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    1. Re:Location, location, location by powerlord · · Score: 1

      Google has lots of offices in places outside the Valley (famously buying a building or two in New York for instance), as do a number of other companies mentioned above.

      Is the article just targeting the Silicon Valley office population, or referring to the company workforce as a whole and already taking those other offices into account?

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    2. Re:Location, location, location by sandytaru · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's my question as well.

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
  19. Tech Diversity by nitsew · · Score: 2

    I have a dream that my four little computers will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their case, but by the content of their harddrives.

    1. Re:Tech Diversity by bdcrazy · · Score: 1

      But is is a hard drive, a hybrid drive, an SSD, a floppy....

      --
      Tonights forecast: Dark. Continued dark throughout most of the evening, with some widely-scattered light towards morning
  20. lack of diversity? by roc97007 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Does the article really mean to say "lack of diversity"? My company's IT department is a little over 80% east Indian, which although technically (probably) meets the definition of "lack of diversity", misses the usual colloquial definition of "too many white guys".

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:lack of diversity? by McFly777 · · Score: 1

      My company's IT department is a little over 80% east Indian...

      So what does your company have against the west side of India?

      --

      McFly777
      - - -
      "What do people mean when they say the computer went down on them?" -Marilyn Pittman
  21. Re:Mod parent DOWN by jedidiah · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's not racism to point out the fact that most H1B scab labor in IT is Indian. It's also not racist to point out that "lowering the bar" is bogus.

    If Jesse wants to wage the next race war, he should start by getting more black kids interested in STEM and education in general. He can fight against the pervasive drug and gang culture that keeps black kids away from any means to better themselves.

    Perhaps he could even get a bunch of athletes and rappers to just read to kids.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  22. Ageism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Sadly, Silicon Valley's rampant ageism goes on unchallenged. Not everyone is affected by race, but eventually everyone is affected by age.

  23. automatic turn-off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Jesse Jackson is a master at crying out racism. This skill resulted in his family getting the beer distribution rights for Bud at Wrigley field and other venues. I would see his cries about silicon valley for what they are, a shakedown.

    Programming/software development is a field that does not tolerate sub-par performers, while for the most part recoginizes exceptional performers.

    1. Re:automatic turn-off by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      Yar, I think he also misunderstands the work involved as well.

      If he were to look at an area with a high percentage of blacks, who were under-represented in low-skill, decent wage jobs (think detroit/rust belt 40 years ago) then he might have a point. IE, there's a large number of people *capable of doing the job* who aren't being hired. And that's fishy.

      IT though, is not anything at all like applying rivets on an assembly line. (despite what PHB's think.) It's a line of work that you actually have to be interested in to succeed. The certifications or degree programs don't guarantee a capable person. And that's what he's missing. Either it's a good-ole boy network that seems to favor indians and asians (and sometimes whites), and specifically excludes the mass of blacks who are good at/interested in coding. OR perhaps it's that there just aren't many qualified people who happen to black.

      Which basically boils down to the fact that If blacks in silicon valley have such an institutionalized sense of inability, that they aren't even trying to learn the skills needed -- then it's hopeless for them anyways. (And there simply is no excuse, the information is out there, for free, or very low cost. There isn't a guild or certifying body to exclude them.. it's as much as a meritocracy as anything in the US.)

      Playing the race card just serves to damage one of the most competitive and functional job markets in the country.

  24. Sometimes I wonder just WTH is up with SV by Rinikusu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Maybe there is something to the SV culture that's either rotten or just too self-absorbed to acknowledge there may be a problem. I'm down in SoCal (LA) and having worked for several small tech shops, I've never seen the issues that a lot of folks complain about up in SV. My workgroup is 50% female, and other than my manager, everyone is a minority (black, asian, indian-asian (and not H1Bs). Upper management tends to be of the white-male variety (I dunno, do we count gingers in that?) although our CEO is white female. I've been on the interview panels and it's not like we were hiring for diversity. We were just looking for people who had the technical know-how and personalities that would not be detrimental to our work group. And, I must add, our women engineers are engineers, not just "tech evangelists" or "tech spokeswomen" and the like that seem to get a lot of controversial press up there. Our black developers? The same. Maybe there really is a tech-bro-fraternity mentality in the SV, I've not moved up there to find out for myself (and as an asian, I don't imagine I'd actually see much of it directed against me, but who knows? More likely, I'd face issues because I'm over the age of 40).

    --
    If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
  25. Racial guilt was so 20th century... by Karmashock · · Score: 2

    I'm beyond it. Our parents aren't. But I think my generation is beyond it. Once they phase out of leadership roles, I think parasites like Jessie will find they have guilt upon which to feed.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  26. Re:Mod parent DOWN by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who's going to read to the athletes and rappers?

  27. At an interview by tyggna · · Score: 1

    I was once told that I'd be working primarily with white males, because only one out of every 200 candidates that apply to work there fit that demographic.

  28. Re:There's no talent shortage by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Like Microsoft laying off 18,000 and simultaneously arguing for more H1B visas?

  29. Re:Mod parent DOWN by John+Jorsett · · Score: 5, Informative

    If Jesse wants to wage the next race war, he should start by getting more black kids interested in STEM and education in general.

    Jackson isn't interested in waging race war, he wants to shakedown businesses for money for his organization and those of his cronies. Making it about race is just his form of extortion. Notice that whenever he goes after some company, it's suddenly made all better when it makes a donation to his cause and/or hires one or more people of Jackson's designation. I really admire the way the CEO of Cypress Semiconductor refused to knuckle under to Jackson back in 2001 after Jackson labeled Cypress a "white supremacist hate group.’” I hope every Silicon Valley target of his does the same.

  30. I rarely agree with Jesse Jackson by fritz1968 · · Score: 1

    We are on the opposite ends of the ideological rainbow (no pun intended), but I agree with part of what he is doing. The USA has plenty of high tech workers to fill any voids in the IT world here in the USA. If the number of H-1B visas should change, it would be to lower it, in my opinion. Definitely, do not increase this number.

    --
    It is not the strongest of the species that survive, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.
  31. Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I can't speak for what it is like in Silicon Valley but where I work in the deep south I would estimate that at least 30% of my fellow tech workers are of African ancestry.

    This seems to only happen in a government setting. Am I right?

    I work in the in Metro Atlanta and I had a few (quite talented I might add) African-American developers. One saved my ass with an encryption routine.

    Geoffry was this Nubian -as he referred to himself - very sharp coder/developer/computer scientist/ or what ever title you want to give him.

    Back in Boca Raton, my boss was this African-American who was a cross between Link on Mod Squad and Mr. Rogers. Brilliant developer who had the management-leadership skills that would melt the brains of the best.

    If I were a rich man....yabba dabba doo ... I'd give him a billion dollars and make him rich too - and me richer.

    1. Re:Nope by ruir · · Score: 1

      My experience with quotas is much contrary to yours... Generally the black guys hired to fill the quotas where very poor technically, and the ones who could advance for their own merit where the very (few) exceptions. If I had to (re)hire the hundred of guys that worked for me, I would only probably hire again one IT guy, and one foreman, they were really something that stands out from the crowd. Apart from that... I have very terrible anecdotes, like employees sabotaging printers with clips to pocket the customers payments, or worse, while doing some contracting work, a freshly (white) IT manager that only worked there a couple of days saying fuck you to a team of 10 network administrators after I called him because nobody could tell me where the central router was, and storming out of the room.

  32. Re:Mod parent DOWN by PseudoCoder · · Score: 3, Informative

    Perhaps he could even get a bunch of athletes and rappers to just read to kids.

    That's assuming these athletes and rappers can even read. http://www.cnn.com/2014/01/07/...

    --
    "Now, I doubt any of you would prefer a rolled up newspaper as a weapon against a dictator or a criminal intruder."
  33. Re:RACIST! by lgw · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And that's EXACLTY how the Jesse Jackson shakedown works.

    "Do what I say or I'll call you a RAAAAAACIST!!!"

    Jackson really should patent that. It's a hell of an effective "business" method.

    Well, I have seen racism in dev shops before, to be sure, but not the sort that Reverend Jackson wants shakedown money for. I've worked for more than one place where "white men born in America" were about 2% of engineers. Normally, it's just not an issue, but at one place the racism was so bad that everyone not of the preferred race left over the course of 6 months after a shift of management. (Not saying what that race was, as the problem was just a couple of assholes, and not a more general problem).

    I've also seen straight-up redneck racist at the first dev shop I ever worked at, back when we rode dinosaurs to work, but that company was so exploitive that racism only makes the middle of its list of abuses.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  34. As an African American, this pisses me off by x_t0ken_407 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't get it...I worked hard and was determined, and built my career from the ground up, WITHOUT a college degree. I don't understand why or even how I've continuously found work in an industry that needs a civil rights movement...? Should I ask the myriad of previous and current minority co-workers their experiences and trials/tribulations in attempting to break into this industry with such a color barrier? This is a fucking slap in the face of the ACTUAL civil rights movement of the past, and it sickens me.

    1. Re:As an African American, this pisses me off by BlackHeron717 · · Score: 1

      Individual achievements have never been able to overshadow the need for civil rights. There were black slave owners, does that mean that racism was over in the 1800's? Barack Obama is president, does that stop the penal system from disproportionately targeting minorities? I applaud you on your success, As a West Indian (I am Caribbean which is a fancy way of saying black in America) in Silicone Valley I have fought uphill with success, but that does not remove the institutional racism present throughout the industry. Still I commend you on your achievements they are only bolstered by the fact you did so in this environment.

  35. Great! by Cardinal+Biggles · · Score: 2

    Yes! I was rejected for a job at Google once. Now I will be able to tell everyone it was only because I'm white. ;-)

    Seriously though, while I agree that hiring should be based on qualifications and not race/gender (or being a USian for that matter you bunch of nationalists), if an industry has so few non-white guys we need to take a long hard look at ourselves to check that there's no unfairness going on.

    1. Re:Great! by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 1

      being a USian
      American, you jackass, United States of America, shortens to American. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland shortens to British, not UKian.

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
  36. Re:FTFY by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2

    While I think that Jackson is an opportunistic jackass, resorting to racial epithets is completely unnecessary and only serves to undercut your message. Be better than this. You owe it to your society and yourself.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  37. Some emphasis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    As a retired executive of a small east coast engineering services firm (and familiar with numerous other execs over a twenty some year career who all felt similar), all it takes is the right skills at the right price to get the job. I'd hired you if you were black, white, brown, or purple if you had the skills we needed at a price we could afford. Our biggest customer was the federal government, and when asked by a minority manager at that goverment agency why we didn't employ more of HIS minority members I noted that the firm was already about 25% total monority hiring. I then asked how I should choose between two equally qualified job candidates; one a member of the manager's minority group, and the other not a minority. The manager stammered and stuttered and was unable to provide any answer. When I suggested I would chose the candidate who would cost the business the least (salary and benifits) you would never have believed the dumbfounded look on the manager's face when hit with the realization that there might be more to hiring than race.

  38. Experience outside the valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm in Cambridge MA, and in 15 years I have interviewed exactly two African American (out of hundreds of interviews) tech workers and both were not close to qualified for the jobs they were interviewing for.
    There's a shortage of candidates!

  39. Re:dazzled by cutting edge gadgets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So we are supposed to allow companies to hire white, heterosexual cis males just because of intelligence, creativity and work ethic? Check your privilege!

  40. Re:Mod parent DOWN-they have CS degrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    He doesn't need to.
              Black Computer Science graduates essentially reached parity in 2006, capturing 12.4% of CS degrees. no longer can they be dismissed as an “under-represented minority”.

           

  41. Don't shoot the messenger by losttoy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I am an Indian (asian) and work in SF and have worked in a few big tech companies down in the valley. I understand that people like Jesse Jackson spew a lot of rhetoric for their own cause not necessarily for upliftment of the people he supposedly represents. And, I also understand, the solution isn't as easy as making tech companies have some sort of affirmative action - if there aren't enough black people with basic tech skills or college degrees then affirmative action isn't going to help. All that said, it is bizarre - in all the places I have worked including the current, there isn't a single black person on the entire floor. And, think, places like Oakland are just right across the Bay here but so few black people on the tech workforce. It speaks volumes about the failed social integration of black people in this nation - and it has failed at so many levels - from basic primary education, healthcare, law enforcement to higher education and outright discrimination. It doesn't matter who's to blame for it, really because at end of the day, you have a population that isn't as functional as the rest and we should be fixing that. Instead, we have these arguments where people don't even seem to recognize the problem.

  42. Re:Mod parent DOWN by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Funny

    So what you are saying is that we need a program where kids go in to read to athletes and rappers?

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  43. Professional Victim by Jerrry · · Score: 1

    Jesse Jackson is a Professional Victim. 'Nuff said.

  44. Re:He's not wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Progressives are all for... being fucking retards.

  45. He's a crook by Charliemopps · · Score: 5, Informative

    Jesse Jackson is a crook and runs a business, not a charity... it's called the Rainbow/PUSH coalition: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R...
    They show up, accuse your business/industry of racism, do not letup until... you donate money to their cause, then they drop the issue.
    It's a scam.

    Just take a look at NASCAR.
    About 15yrs ago, NASCAR tried to break out of the south and become a mainstream sport. They were largely successful. Jesse Jackson saw this as an opportunity, went on morning talk shows and accused the industry of racism for their lack of black participants. Now, I'm not even going to argue that point... there are very few African Americans in NASCAR. It may very well have a problem with race... that's not the problem.

    What's the problem then? NASCAR then donated around $250,000 to Jesse Jacksons Rainbow Coalition and suddenly they were right with black America, Jessie Jackson dropped the issue and said NASCAR didn't have a race problem. NASCAR didn't add a single black employee or change any of their policies. The problem isn't that there isn't a racial divide in NASCAR or even Silicon Valley. The problem is Jessie Jackson doesn't care. He just wants to use that disparity to extort money from those businesses. He's a scam artist and a crook, and it's sad he's seen with such reverence in this country. He's done nothing but harm the black community and he should be ashamed of himself.

  46. Re:Experience outside the valley--I agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    yes, this is the case. Glad you spoke up.
    The AFL-CIO reports that more

    African Americans earn more computer-related degrees than Asians or Hispanics.[8]

            In 2010, 4,565 Bachelor’s degrees were awarded to African Americans in computer and information science. African Americans earned 1,193 more Bachelor’s degrees than Asians and 1,623 more than Hispanics.
            Also in 2010, African American students earned 1,324 Master’s degrees in computer and information sciences.

    see more here: http://www.brightfuturejobs.com/they_want_you_to_blame_us

    Donna Conroy, Director

  47. Barriers to entry by jgotts · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The major cause of the lack of minority and women computer programmers was a financial barrier to entry.

    Today, you can get a desktop computer for $250. You can get a tablet for $300. You can get a laptop for $400. You can get an Android smartphone for $600, all pretty much medium to high end hardware, nothing second hand or used. 15 years ago, you had to invest a minimum of $1000 to get a new computer, and $1500 would give you something more reasonable. Importantly, decent home broadband connections are now affordable for all but the poorest individuals.

    The difference between someone becoming a computer programmer and making millions of dollars throughout his or her career and someone not in the field might now only be a few hundred dollar initial investment whereas when I was a kid it was thousands of dollars. Fortunately, we don't have to worry about that large investment anymore, so this aspect of the problem has solved itself.

    There are plenty of scholarship opportunities for minority and women computer programmers, but they need to get started way before college. Nobody learns programming at the university. If you're doing programming for the first time at the university, then very likely you'll never want to do it again. The programming work you do at school is dull, formulaic, theoretical, useless, and often frustrating.

  48. Now I know it's bullshit by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

    Anytime Jesse Jackson gets involved, you know it's more about skin color than relevant metrics.

    In some cultures, we might call that "racist".

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
  49. Re:Mod parent DOWN by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If Jesse wants to wage the next race war, he should start by getting more black kids interested in STEM and education in general

    I would keep an eye on that space. Since January, I've visited two very impressive inner-city STEM programs. One's run by the University of Michigan and is in Detroit, of all places, and the other is right here in Chicago, at Lindblom High, run by a friend of mine.

    The real interesting part will come in a few years, when these incredibly smart and capable kids start showing up in tech jobs. Then we'll see how many cries of, "affirmative action" we start to hear when a young black kid who grew up in a rough neighborhood gets promoted. We'll learn a little more about whether racism is a thing of the past or not.

    Seriously. At the Detroit place (it can't really be called a "school" because it's more of a maker space with a bunch of very sharp faculty), there was a kid who was coming out of the program and he had some very impressive schools recruiting him (but they wanted him to get his G.E.D. first, for some reason). He ended up getting his G.E.D., but then took a job with a well-known tech firm, because why would he go all NCAA, when the pros were calling, you know?

    It's going to be an interesting time.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  50. Jesse Jackson is racist by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    Why is Jesse Jackson only protesting about the rights of African and Latino Americans instead of the rights of ALL Americans?
    Isn't that the very defintion of being blatantly racist?

    1. Re:Jesse Jackson is racist by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      He did, I guess you can't read: "Jackson spoke to press after meeting with Labor Secretary Tom Perez for a review of H-1B visas, arguing that data show Americans have the skills and should have first access to high-paying tech work. "

  51. Re:Jackson is Supporting the Right to Compete by jcr · · Score: 1

    As 3 tech advocacy groups show, Manpower, IBM, and Infosys are blocking qualified candidates.

    "claim", not "show", Donna.

    You're full of shit.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  52. Re:Mod parent DOWN by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

    Right....because it's not like the STEM jobs aren't going to H1B visa holders...oh wait they are....moron.

  53. Sigh... by kwiqsilver · · Score: 1

    So rather than asking why there aren't more blacks in tech, and addressing those issues (which mostly center on the welfare state and drug war destroying black culture), Jesse is going to pretend to still be relevant by trying to get racial hiring quotas in the tech industry. Oh joy...
    Racism against minorities is about as common in the US as polio (both exist only due to small pockets of people who ignore reason and logic). Jesse needs to keep fanning the flames on anything he can. Otherwise he'd have to get a productive job...like the white, Indian, and Chinese techies he wants to get fired.
    How come Jesse isn't concerned with the lack of diversity in professional basketball?

    1. Re:Sigh... by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      Leave it to a racist to claim there's no racism.

  54. Re:RACIST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Black Googler Network"

    What a bunch of racists! I wonder how strong the "White Googler Network" is. Or the "Hispanic Googler Network". Or the "Men's Googler Network".

    What a bunch of race hustling, shake-down artists.

  55. Re:And how about a real tax on wealth? by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

    Pay your taxes hippy.

  56. Re:Mod parent DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So what you are saying is that we need a program where kids go in to read to athletes and rappers?

    But the only pool of kids that can do that are the very ones these athletes and rappers BEAT UP in school for acting white by learning to read in the first place!

  57. Re:Mod parent DOWN by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

    That others engage in cronyism doesn't make Jesse Jackson's actions not cronyism.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  58. K-12 Education by eepok · · Score: 1

    This and many similar disparities are only solvable with enhanced K-12 education in low-income, low-performing areas. Yes, that means spending more federal/state dollars per capita than in median income areas. More teachers (that stay for more than 3 years), smaller classrooms (that also have heating, cooling, and supplies), and more reliable funding. It does not suffice to provide equal state funding-- we got shit to fix.

    Not enough minorities at Microsoft? What's the proportion of minorities in the tech field?
    Not enough minorities in the tech field? What's the proportion of minorities taking STEM majors?
    Not enough minorities in STEM majors? How prevalent and to what quality was their STEM education in K-12?

    It always comes back to the K-12 education. Crime, poverty, treatment of women, minority imbalance in industry-- How good was the education?

    Want to fix the future? Focus on the education of the poor.

    1. Re:K-12 Education by k6mfw · · Score: 1

      this subject was discussed before, and there was this comment (I saved it as example of poor K-12 education, and those kids that get stuck with it):
      "Black people tend to be poor. Poor people tend not to have good schools in their neighborhoods. Having a bad education makes you less qualified to do certain jobs. Rather than trying to get people to hire more black people, we should be trying to fix the massive gap in the quality of schools in rich and poor neighborhoods."

      --
      mfwright@batnet.com
    2. Re:K-12 Education by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      Can you point to a jurisdiction that has solved any of those problems through increased education spending?

    3. Re:K-12 Education by eepok · · Score: 1

      No, because it's not just increased education spending that creates better educated students. Buying iPads for everyone in the school will accomplish nothing. Spending money on a giant football field is worthless.

      That money has to be spent on:

      (1) Small class sizes
      --- Case Studies: http://www.classsizematters.or...
      -- Decreasing class sizes while keeping the same student population requires more classrooms and more teachers.

      (2) Climate Control
      --- Research: http://healthyschools.cefpi.or...
      -- Ensuring sufficient climate control in classrooms requires permission to expend resources on the use of A/C and heaters and, in many cases, the actual installation of HVAC systems.

      (3) Sufficient school supplies
      --- Research: Not handy, but it's fairly common sense that if your school can't afford to make copies of worksheets, those worksheets cannot be completed. Then, of course, there's paper, pencils, etc.

      (4) Passionate teachers and their retention
      -- This does not necessarily mean "pay teachers more". It means choosing teachers better and ignoring those who are in Teach for America for 3 years so they can pad their law school applications.
      -- Good, committed teachers are worth tenure, pension, and reserve fund to pay for substitutes. If you don't give them the financial security required to work hard in bad neighborhoods, they will take their resumes and go to other districts.

      (5) After school programs for parents of students
      -- 99.99% of the valuable education these students will receive comes from the school, but if the parent's do buy into it, that student will have to *fight* all the ailments of home just to graduate high school. Involve the parents by bringing them to school or visiting home and you'll see the investment stick.

    4. Re:K-12 Education by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      OK, so even though education spending is at an all-time per-student high, you can't find a single jurisdiction that has solved any of the problems you advocate spending more money on education for?

      Can you point to a jurisdiction that has spent money in the ways you're now advocating and has solved the economic problems you listed previously?

    5. Re:K-12 Education by eepok · · Score: 1

      You may have missed the first line I wrote, so I'll post it again: "... it's not just increased education spending that creates better educated students."

      The raw number of dollars spent within the general concept of education is irrelevant because it includes really stupid expenses like competitive athletics expenses, hair-brained over-investment in classroom tech, and luxury buildings for brand new schools who are seeking to attract the best and brightest teachers (to the detriment of other schools).

      Moreover, I provided links to research and case studies that show the benefits of my suggestions. One doesn't need to prove that a combination of treatments work before trying a combination of treatments.

      I'll brake it down easy for you:

      Given: Schools in poor neighborhoods provide poor education to their students. Those students grow up with a higher rate of criminality and a lower chance to enter the (fiscal) middle class.

      Suggestion: Decrease class room size (proven benefits by research)
      Suggestion: Ensure sufficient climate control (proven benefits by research)
      Suggestion: Engage the parents (proven benefits by research)
      Suggestion: Recruit passionate and competent educators and make the necessary efforts required to convince them to stay long-term (proven benefits by experience)
      Suggestion: Implement all of the above for a single school in a very bad part of town.

      Would you assert that these actions, widely implemented over a low-income, low-performing area are not likely to beneficially affect the futures of the students, families, and neighborhoods treated?

    6. Re:K-12 Education by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      I suspect that if done right, it may have a marginal affect. But since there's no chance of increased spending actually being spent in that mannger, I'll have to not hold my breath.

  59. Re:Jackson is Supporting the Right to Compete by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

    Really? -Census reported that only one in four STEM degree holders is in a STEM job
    -Microsoft announced plans to downsize its workforce by 18,000 jobs.
    - analyses on the issues have not been able to find any credible evidence to support the IT industry’s assertions of labor shortages. http://press.princeton.edu/tit...

    So good luck with you bullshit.

  60. Jackson should critique the black community first. by Morpeth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is not a racist rant, but a realistic look at some of the issues Jackson might want to address within the black community first before taking his usual stance of blaming everyone else:

    72% of black kids born out of wedlock (compared to 17% for Asians). The Rev [cough] Jackson himself had an affair & fathered a child with another woman.
    Double the unemployment rates of whites (roughly 5.4 to 11.5% as of last month)
    Why doesn't he talk about the negative affects of hip-hop culture (glorifying violence, promoting misogynistic attitudes to an extreme, promotes wealth through any (often illegal) means)
    On average, African American twelfth-grade students read at the same level as white eighth-grade students. 54% of African Americans graduate from high school, compared to more than three quarters of white and Asian students. [http://www.pbs.org/wnet/tavissmiley/tsr/too-important-to-fail/fact-sheet-outcomes-for-young-black-men/]
    50% of the murders in the country are committed by black men, who comprise only 6% of the total US population. NEVER talks about, but will spend endless hours race baiting over a single case like Martin.
    Look at the murder rate in Chicago, his home town (and the perps)

    As a liberal myself, Jackson's race baiting and racial profiteering sickens me -- he only uses his racial politics to advance his own ego and fatten his wallet. He hasn't been a civil rights leader in decades in my opinion, he's a self serving jerk who actually promotes racism, a dependence culture and victim mentality. He's done more damage to the black community than good, but is such a smooth talker, his fans don't see it.

    --

    'The unexamined life is not worth living' - Socrates
  61. Can't the Mods stop these racist rants? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    First: I'm white and I'm not a liberal. Seriously, people indicting Jackson here, and by implication defending the BS practices of high tech, with their H1-B abuse, where there IS recism at work, including racism of the kind where many, many recruiters in SV are of Indian origin, and who "hire their own". THIS is reality. What about ageism in SV?

    And don't go telling me that SV is a meritocracy!! There are so many incompetent operators (including coders) in the SV pig pen that it isn't even funny. Have you forgotten that almost everything that is put out for sale these days is bug-ridden? Get a life!

    And, Go Jesse! Bring it to these tech companies who have been getting away with EVERYTHING while they walk away with profit at the expense of everyone else.

    1. Re:Can't the Mods stop these racist rants? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, and it would be awesome if he would do that, or if that were remotely his intent. But Jesse just wants SV companies to hire more black people. He doesn't care about the real reason there aren't a lot of black people in tech - he just wants to force companies to magically hire more black people regardless. Indians? Ageism? Yeah a real "Civil Rights Leader" should care about that, but I guarantee he does not...

    2. Re:Can't the Mods stop these racist rants? by ganjadude · · Score: 2

      there IS a racism problem in tech, but not the racism problem that jackson wants. The racism as you pointed out is directed to americans, white or black or hispanic, only asians seem to be protected in tech.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    3. Re:Can't the Mods stop these racist rants? by bbsalem · · Score: 1

      Fuck Silicon Valley and Fuck Stanford! What started out as electronics and computers has deteriorated into a Social Media Scam driven by prejudiced recruiters and racists paid for by unscrupulous investors and venture capitalists. It is plutocracy and elitism of the kind that led millionaires to build lavish mansions on the Peninsula long before there was any electronics.

      I live in the Bay Area, was born here and live at the north end of Silicon Valley and am rooting against its interests, against the boosters in the city governments and the state. I wish Rick Perry had lured some of the spoiled brats to Texas, they are spoiling it for "normal' people. Even Fuck U.C. for contributing to the elitism to what extant a public university can do along side a private one, creating an exceptional class who think more of themselves than they should. There needs to be far greater humility than there is and I surly hope that the overblown egos of this area will get laid low, even it it is just a property value crash. I laugh at Livy Stadium possibly not having enough infrastructure, transportation and parking to host 49'er games without causing grid lock in Santa Clara. It serves the idiots who run Silicon Valley to suffer a big crunch. When business people realize that poor management of growth and infrastructure really does hurt productivity, like it did in 1999 and 2000 when commutes were starting to cut into hours at work of all workers in SV, then they will start to look elsewhere, even Texas, and when that happens I will be happy since the Republicans have always been first advocating for growth even if it creates crunches and elites. Maybe Texas deserves Silicon Valley. In any case, nature may get the last word as SV lives on shakey ground. The Bay Area is a pull-apart basin in the San Andreas Transform system.

  62. Re:What Jesse wants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    California will become a battleground state in 2016 Election if Liberals keep it up.

  63. Re:What Jesse wants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Jesse Jackson is not a Black leader. He does not and never has spoken for Black people. He is self serving and always has been.
    However!
    As one of the few Black men in IT, I have to say it is prejudicial almost every time I interview for a position. I have over 15 years in IT. I have done Software Engineering; SQA Engineering; Systems Engineering and Technical Project Management. There have been questions of my ability to do what is on my resume that are legit. But I have had more than a few instances where it was obvious to me that the questions "all of a sudden" take a weird turn. I applied for a Systems Admin position, did really well on the phone technical screen. Came in for a face to face and things took a turn. Under the guise of "I just want to see how you think" questions that are usually asked to potential Software Developers are being asked. I handled the questions with ease (a good education AND experience as a Developer). The surprise on the face of interviewer was disheartening. I knew what was being attempted. So now questions like, "How does one measure the amount of water passing a particular point in a river?" or "Why can you not see the Moon during the day?" are being asked. I've asked more than a few of my IT colleagues if they have had these situations and not one has. The assumption that all Blacks are from the "Inner City" "the ghetto" or "Urban" and lack education is so wrong. There are many of us that are twice as good and make half as much because of the Supremacist entitlement that pervades this culture.

  64. Re:HANG THESE SICK LEFTISTS ALREADY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Dear Sir:

    Please move.

    Based upon your passion and certainty, I think you would love the Libertarian Paradise that is today's Modern Somalia. Exceedingly little Government Interference. Significant numbers of gun-toting neighbors with whom to Fraternize and enjoy (vicariously, of course, after your move) your (formerly) 2nd Amendment Rights. Considerable Religious Fervor and Pressure towards Infidels and Tacit Approval of the Melding of *BOTH* Church *AND* State.

    We are of the Concerted Opinion that you should re-Locate immediately if not sooner.

    That said, and the lawyers remind us to add for legal protection:

    Be Advised: Strong Adherents of Assless-Chaps Fashion Statements should exercise Caution when exiting a domicile with a full-range pivot screen door.

  65. Re:Jackson is Supporting the Right to Compete by kwiqsilver · · Score: 1

    Having conducted many tech interviews over the past 17 years, in high demand markets, I can say that the number of qualified candidates in the US is abysmally low compared to the open positions. There are lots of people with degrees in CS or a similar field, but the ones who can actually do the job at the level required is very low. If we find someone who can code well enough to do the work, we don't care how much pigmentation it has, what it's genitals look like, what gods it reveres (if any), or any of that other crap.

    The imports are absolutely necessary to keep American companies competitive in a global market. Otherwise the 21st century tech centers will be in south or east Asia, along with all the profits, high paying jobs, and resulting tax revenue.

    And what Jesse wants is money for his group, or to be on the news. He's a person who used to have power, and is now completely irrelevant. He's desperately clinging to anything he can.

  66. Re:RACIST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Jesse Jackson is the worst Racist evarrrrrrr..

    Butttt, buttttt, butttt I'm BLACK, I MUST BE PROTECTED AND GIVEN PREFERENCE BECUZ I"M BLACKKKKKKKKKKK

    Sorry Jesse, you're butt-hurt.

    Find qualified people who actually applied for the positions and were rejected because of their race, then you might have a leg to stand on, otherwise, here's a case of shut-the-fuck-up.

  67. Re:Mod parent DOWN by microbox · · Score: 1

    Ending the war on drugs would be a good step towards breaking down the honour culture that causes so many problems for some African Americans. Don't forget that this happens because of institutionalized incentive structures.

    --

    Like all pain, suffering is a signal that something isn't right
  68. I sort of support what Jackson's saying, has merit by echtertyp · · Score: 4, Interesting
    As a white guy - born in Europe even! -- I can say that while working in Mountain View, California it was indeed overwhelmingly young, male, with mostly Northern European genes sloshing around. Some Asian but not as much as you'd think.

    That said our boss was quite a progressive guy and reached out to hire a black guy and several typical American women. The women were a disappointment. It has to be said that they proved to be demanding low performers. Had high expectations of everything and everyone else, but didn't really put points on the board for the team. In talks about the women I learned the US English codeword PITA, not the flat bread, but Pain In The A**. It was true.

    The black guy turned out well. In the first couple months he was very reserved and looking back I think he was very keen to not make mistakes or rub anyone the wrong way. But man, after that first 90 days or so, he relaxed and realized we weren't going to bite him, and he started learning the craft with real zeal. He was one of the hardest working fellows I ever met in my time in the U.S.

    I think the dynamic is that black people in the U.S. are all too accustomed to having "the prize" and opportunity dangled in front of them, and then snatched away once someone has got what they wanted from that black person. So they I think have learned to regard the larger American system with suspicion or at least much caution. However if they see by actions and not words that something is the real deal, the team is there and they are part of it, no bait and switch, they really get fired up and loving it.

  69. That's funny! MLK was a leader. Jackson a whiner & by raymorris · · Score: 3, Interesting

    >. I pray, when they die, the ghost of MLK spends eternity bitch-slapping the both of them day in and day out.

      That put a smile on my face. MLK was a leader, one of the best. Jackson is not a leader, he's a whiner. Also a liar. WWhas it Jesse or Sharpton who was about 8 years old when he started calling himself "Reveren"? Either way, they're the same - professional whiners. Where exactly is your church, reverend? I'll try to avoid having my daughter exposed to either of them, lying and telling her she can't do anything because of her complexion.

  70. drug, gang, and *victimhood* culture by hsthompson69 · · Score: 1

    I'll assert that even more pernicious than drug and gang culture is the culture of *victimhood*. When you believe that your failings are not your personal responsibility, and instead insist that they are someone else's fault, and that you must wait and demand for reparation from that someone else before life can continue, you end up in a morass. Mr. Jackson lives in this morass full time.

  71. Re: RACIST! by Type44Q · · Score: 5, Insightful

    in there places

    Come now, that's hardly proper Ebonics; you've got the wrong pronunciation and spelling. :p

    On a more serious note, I'd never judge anyone by their skin color or ethnic background... but their behavior and cultural attitude, that's goddamned fair game. And I'm willing to bet that if you insist on "acting black," I'm not likely to find your abilities any more impressive than if you act like whitetrash or a dumb hick. Reality may be a bitch; what she isn't is a racist. ;)

  72. There's a different echo... by hsthompson69 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Problem is, racism is stereotyped. White males are assumed to be racist, women and blacks are assumed to be less racist. Ask 10 slashdotters if white male hiring managers would be racist in their ratings of resumes, or if women and black hiring managers would be racist in their ratings of resumes, and I'll bet they'll rate the white male highest in terms of racism :)

    There is an echo chamber of social prejudice where the social prejudice of given groups is taken as natural and confirmed.

    The fact of the matter? I've met more black racists than white ones. YMMV.

    1. Re:There's a different echo... by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Problem is, privilege is stereotyped. White males are assumed to be privileged, women and other races are assumed to be victims. Ask 10 slashdotters if white male hiring managers would use race and sex in their ratings of resumes, or if women and non whites would use race and sex in their ratings of resumes, and I'll bet they'll rate the white male highest in using those discriminators.

      The reality is that identity politics is building this bias into the culture and legal system under the guise of fighting it everywhere. We are supposed to default to the assumption that white males are privileged and everyone else is not, when it is everyone else who is privileged by the system so long as they lack whiteness and/or maleness.

    2. Re:There's a different echo... by jythie · · Score: 1

      Actually, no. Studies on sexism at least have shown women are just as sexist when it comes to women as men are. One of the big fallacies is the idea that racism and sexism are the domain of white males, white males are simply the ones who tend to benefit the most from it. But the social ideas about who is inferior or superior are internalized across the board, that is why the are systemic social issues rather then individual problems.

  73. Re:Actually... by bjwest · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Anyone interested in an electronics degree, just like those interested in CS of any type (IT, programming, networking, whatever), should already know the basics. The sciences are not something you just decide to do on enrollment day and expect to be good at. There are certain skills and aptitudes that need to be in place, a way of thinking out problems that cannot be easily learned, and not having an interested in them until you're deciding on your future carer on college enrollment day, is setting yourself up for failure.

    If you're in it for the money, you're going to suck as a professional in any science, and you're work will be sub par.

    --

    --- Keep the choice with the user..
  74. Forced diversity in Education by Maven0 · · Score: 1

    I just had an interesting idea. If there is a disparity in the diversity of an industry, then when beginning university we should mandate that equal portions of people attend each major. We already trying to do it to businesses. Why not extend it to the university? It doesn't make any sense. I think businesses are so money hungry these days they do not care about race. Most will pick the most qualified individual for the lowest pay they can find them. Don't blame industry because of differing cultural interest in university.

    1. Re:Forced diversity in Education by McFly777 · · Score: 1

      You are about 20 years (or more) late.

      Long story made short: I was on the review/selection board for a college of engineering summer-camp program. If you were a white male, your application wasn't even considered.

      --

      McFly777
      - - -
      "What do people mean when they say the computer went down on them?" -Marilyn Pittman
  75. The root of the problem is culture & social cl by Theovon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For some reason, Americans have developed a stereotype of "white" and "black" that is related far more to social class than anything else. When you say "white," we imagine someone from the middle class. When you say "black," we imagine someone from lower socioeconomic status. How many blacks are in the middle class, I'm not sure, but as for whites in lower classes, we have them coming out our ears. While we may have millions of blacks who live in ghettos, we have 10 times as many whites living in trailor parks.

    Because of our confusion between ethnicity and social class, we end up with things like Dave Chappelle's "Racial Draft": http://www.thecomedynetwork.ca/blogs/2013/06/chappelles-show-june5-racial-draft
    While amusing, it highlights the real problem, and this false stereotype is widespread throughout American culture.

    I recall an interview with Bill Cosby, talking about educational advancement among black children. Peers discourage each other from studying because it's "acting white." When in fact it is "acting middle class," because this same kind of discouragement occurs among lower class whites as well. As long as education is not valued within any group, that group will have difficulty being equally represented in white collar industries.

    What we have to work out to explain the disparity between population demographics and white collar job demographics is the proportions of the underrepresented groups who discourage education. People like Jesse Jackson want to make this all out to be the result of prejudice on the basis of genetics or skin color. Honestly, I think we're long past that. There are still plenty of racist bastards out there, but in general, we do not have pink people acting intentionally or unconsciously to undermine the advancement of brown people when it comes to getting college degrees.

    It's not PC to talk about genetic differences, but genetics is interesting. Geneticists have identified differences between different ethnic groups, and they have correlated them with some minor differences in physical and cognitive adaptations. Things like muscle tone, susceptibility to certain diseases, social ability, and other things have been correlated to a limited degree with variation in human DNA. But the average differences between genetic groups are miniscule compared to their overlap (statistically, we have very small mu / sigma for basically any meaningful measurable characteristic).

    Thus I can only conclude that correcting any disparities must come from within. Regulating businesses won't do any good, because unqualified minorities will end up getting unfairly hired and promoted. We have to start with the children and get them to develop an interest in science and math. If Jesse Jackson wants to fix this problem, he need to learn science and math and start teaching it. I assure you, even at his age, he has that capability, if he just cared enough to do it. Unfortunately for him, if he were to corrupt himself with this knowledge, he would find himself taking a wholly different approach than the "we're victims" schtick he's played most of his life. Personally, I prefer the "the universe is awesome" philosophy held by Neil deGrasse Tyson. He's one of my biggest heroes, having nothing to do with his skin tone.

    One last though: I'm sure someone will find something racist in what I have said. Either that or I'm being too anti-racist and appear like I'm overcompensating. There are also aspects of these social issues I know nothing about. I'm just writing a comment on Slashdot that is about as well-informed as any other comment. One thing people should think about in general is whether or not they have hidden prejudices. It's not their fault, having been brought up in a culture that takes certain thing for granted. Instead of burying our heads in the sand, we should be willing to admit that we probably do have subconscious prejudices. That's okay, as long as we consciously behave in a way that is fair to other human beings, regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, autism, or any other thing they didn't choose to be born with (and plenty of things they have chosen, because it's people's right to choose).

  76. Re:That's funny! MLK was a leader. Jackson a whine by CanHasDIY · · Score: 3, Interesting

    >. I pray, when they die, the ghost of MLK spends eternity bitch-slapping the both of them day in and day out.

      That put a smile on my face.

    Glad I could do that for ya!

    MLK is one of my personal heroes, right up there alongside Nikola Tesla and Samuel Clemens. Which is what makes it hilarious, for me, when I bitch about Jackson and Sharpton, and someone has the nerve to call me a racist for it.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  77. Re:There's no talent shortage by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

    If they're laying off mostly non-programmers (i.e. "overhead"), but are still hiring for programming positions, then this would make sense. If not, then it's pretty inexcusable. In either case, someone should have known that at the very least, this would end up looking really bad for them.

    Regardless, the fact that the e-mail describing the layoffs actually used the word "synergies" three times told me all I needed to know about the new CEO. Someone in touch with today's culture would never have used that word unless he was mocking another company for using it. Even when using business buzzwords, Microsoft is still about five years behind the times.

    --
    Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
  78. A paucity of candidates by MikeMo · · Score: 1

    In my 30 years of software management, I was presented exactly once with a black candidate, and I hired him. Excellent programmer and co-worker. I don't know why, but there just aren't many black candidates. How can we achieve parity if there are no candidates?

    1. Re:A paucity of candidates by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      In my 30 years of software management, I was presented exactly once with a black candidate, and I hired him. Excellent programmer and co-worker. I don't know why, but there just aren't many black candidates. How can we achieve parity if there are no candidates?

      Bingo. And it is not just with Blacks. It is also with Hispanics (I'm a Hispanic engineer btw). Our communities truly suck at giving our kids the proper STEM role models.

      This could be seen as a civil rights issue, but it is not one to be taken by the tech industry. It is one to be tackled by our communities themselves. Jesse Jackson is either an asshole or he doesn't know what the hell he is talking about (with a propensity to look at everything from the "keeping-the-man-down" lenses.)

    2. Re:A paucity of candidates by MikeMo · · Score: 1

      Ya know, I meant to add the same comment for Hispanics. I've seen and hired one Hispanic programmer, also pretty good.

  79. Re:RACIST! by ganjadude · · Score: 1

    im not sure, i think al sharpton is a bigger racist

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  80. Re:Mod parent DOWN by ilparatzo · · Score: 2

    If Jesse wants to wage the next race war, he should start by getting more black kids interested in STEM and education in general.

    Publicity opportunities while doing something like that are fewer and farther between. Not to mention, it's a harder goal to accomplish than simply whipping up a portion of the population into a frenzy. It's really too bad that the black leaders who are really helping to get kids into STEM or even just graduating high school at higher rates don't get all the same levels of publicity as the Al Sharptons and Jesse Jackons of the world. Not to mention that their messages likely dilute the hard work being done.

    It's one thing to scream and yell about a lack of diversity and call on that diversity to be increased. It's a whole other thing to actually do something about it, digging at the root cause and fixing the real problem. It might even make you have to face some hard truths. That is eminently more difficult. It's too bad with give more face time to the first group than we do the second.

  81. Some survival cultures are better than others. by hsthompson69 · · Score: 1

    Poor asian kids, fresh off the boat, in crappy neighborhoods, focus on survival but still excel in academics and escape the poverty trap.

    Certain cultures of poor american kids, born and raised in a victimhood culture, in crappy neighborhoods, focus not only on survival, but denigrate any of their peers who attempt to "act white" by speaking proper english or focusing on academics. These people don't escape the poverty trap.

    We've long gotten past the point in time where whitey is actually doing any oppressing - the victimhood culture *oppresses itself*, by making it anathema to actually succeed.

  82. It always happens eventually... by devnullrandom · · Score: 1

    The looters are coming to plunder our fields

  83. Re:Actually... by ganjadude · · Score: 1

    i learned ohms law in high school, just what it was and its basics, not application or anything but that should be easy stuff for a 3rd year

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  84. The Supreme Court Would by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Ricci v. DeStefano http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB124640586803076705
    Fisher v. University of Texas http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2012/10/09/supreme-court-affirmative-action/1623487/
    Michigan Proposal 2 http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/23/us/supreme-court-michigan-affirmative-action-ban.html?_r=0

  85. Re:And how about a real tax on wealth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So how about a national property tax on assets, too, while we're fixing all the hypocrisy in IT land?

    What assets... I leased them from a subsidiary of another company in sweeden. Oh some other company owns that think they are in Ireland. Hell we lost money on this deal we get a nice tax break.

    Your way makes it easier to dodge taxes.

  86. Re:RACIST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Posting as A. C because you are afraid to face the Black Man.

    Comander Taco, Now is the time for a -1 RACIST moderation to put these peope in there places!

    And that's EXACLTY how the Jesse Jackson shakedown works.

    "Do what I say or I'll call you a RAAAAAACIST!!!"

    Jackson really should patent that. It's a hell of an effective "business" method.

    Prior art anti-semite!

  87. Sounds fair by gelfling · · Score: 1

    Just lower the standards until all the black people are hired. Then lower them so more for all the illiterate Mexicans. And so on.

  88. Re:What Jesse wants by Quirkz · · Score: 1

    "Why can you not see the Moon during the day?"

    I sure hope your answer was, "What the hell are you talking about? I see the moon during the day all the time."

  89. Re:RACIST! by Notabadguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Jesse has a point, but only so far as he takes it across the board. If we're pushing for affirmative action in tech, then it should apply everywhere. Including professional sports. I think it's only fair that NBA teams show a mandatory 10% white men with equal playtime on the court, 10% asian, and 5% latino.

  90. That's what a technical interview is by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 4, Informative

    There have been questions of my ability to do what is on my resume that are legit.

    I do a lot of technical interviewing, and that is the whole point of a technical interview, to verify that you actually do possess the skills that you have claimed to possess.

    It's not because you're black. It's because you're interviewing. I could tell so many stories of wild resume claims, you'd laugh.

    Here's one from today, for an interviewee who was an "expert in J2EE".

    Q: What are some different types of EJBs and how do they differ from one another?
    A: [uncomfortable silence].
    Q: Sorry, let's back up a bit. Tell me about your role in your last project that used J2EE.
    A: Uhh, I think I made a JSP once in college before I left to go work at a startup.

    As you might expect, his resume got filed away in the recycling bin.

    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    1. Re:That's what a technical interview is by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

      I put something on my CV, and got a relatively simple question that confirmed I knew more about it than the interviewer. It was tangentially related, but established me as legit.

      I asked the same question two years later with essentially the same details on the CV. Not even an attempt at the answer.

      That interview got ratcheted up in terms of expectation. Everything was questioned. Because that's all we really have to go on when trying to decide what to ask. If our ad said Oracle, and you list Oracle, we are going to ask. If you didn't list Oracle, we are going to try to fit you in somewhere by asking things other than Oracle.

      Everything on the CV is fair game. If we ask your address and it doesn't match, you should have a really good explanation for sending an out of date CV. Because I care whether I hire someone who doesn't at least say, "I can tell you what's on there, and that it's out of date."

      Because when someone asks a question, they rarely want to know what they asked. And if you can parse my question and figure out why I'm asking, I might hire you just based on ability to think. If you back up and say let's go back to this question, that shows me you can admit being wrong and background process. If you call me a day later, that shows you think about things overnight, but aren't content to just let it go.

      If you pretend any of this, I'm no psychologist, but it's going to feel really odd, and I'm going to have a hard time working with you.

      I prepare based on the CV. I interview based on the CV. I am not going to assume that the liars out there are telling the truth.

    2. Re:That's what a technical interview is by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      Because when someone asks a question, they rarely want to know what they asked.

      This is absolutely true.

      For today's interview, the role had no J2EE component to it at all. But the resume said "expert", so I have to ask the question. I need to know if we're being lied to.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    3. Re:That's what a technical interview is by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      There have been questions of my ability to do what is on my resume that are legit.

      I do a lot of technical interviewing, and that is the whole point of a technical interview, to verify that you actually do possess the skills that you have claimed to possess.

      It's not because you're black. It's because you're interviewing. I could tell so many stories of wild resume claims, you'd laugh.

      Here's one from today, for an interviewee who was an "expert in J2EE".

      Q: What are some different types of EJBs and how do they differ from one another?
      A: [uncomfortable silence].
      Q: Sorry, let's back up a bit. Tell me about your role in your last project that used J2EE.
      A: Uhh, I think I made a JSP once in college before I left to go work at a startup.

      As you might expect, his resume got filed away in the recycling bin.

      He said there were questions that were legit. He then went on to say that there were questions that were not legit.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
  91. Re:RACIST! by Notabadguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Oh, and I think that every Society for Black Engineers needs a counterpart Society for White Engineers.

  92. Re:Mod parent DOWN by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Oh, of course not. It just demonstrates the hypocrisy of the accuser.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  93. Re:What Jesse wants by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1

    "Why can you not see the Moon during the day?"

    I'm really curious as to the answer you came up with for this question.

    --

    How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
  94. Visas by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 1

    If Jackson is actually worried about racial diversity, wouldn't his proposed solution (drastically reducing the number of foreign workers by cutting H-1B visas) actually make the problem worse?

  95. Translation: by kaatochacha · · Score: 2

    "Pay my Rainbow Coalition money or I'll make trouble"

  96. The Indians are united while the Americans are dev by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Senator blasts Microsoft for hb1 push and firing 18000 workers
    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kedfVAbXNy0
    and here is a petition to stop the hb1
    http://www.petition2congress.com/7637/abolish-h1b-visa-program/
    Sign the petition and help solve the problem for everyone America united anyone?

  97. Re:Experience outside the valley--I agree by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 1

    And if you look at the rest of the data (i.e. the "National Center for Education" "Digest of Education Statistics" "Table 322.30") :

    http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d13/tables/dt13_322.30.asp

    You will notice, that if you breakdown the ethnicity into percentages of degrees conferred, for "computer and information sciences" for 2011-2012, you will see there were 47,384 Bachelor degrees earned by students, of which 30,211 identified as "white" (63.75%), 5,410 as "black" (11.41%), 4,008 as "hispanic" (8.45%), and 4,254 as "asian" (8.97%). There are also another 2,360 "non-resident alien" listed which no ethnicity is given.

    Now looking at people working at Yahoo!, 50% White (13% less than percentage earning degrees in USA in 2011-2012), 39% "asian" (30% more than percentage earning degrees), 4% hispanic (4-5% less than percentage earning degrees), 2% black (9% less than those earning degrees).

    If you look at all the other companies on that list linked in the article, you will see roughly the same trend, with "whites" having about the same proportional makeup of the companies as there are those getting degrees, asians having a much higher percentage of the workforce than are getting degrees in the US (wow, not surprising since we are importing most of this labor via H1B, green card, immigration), and blacks and hispanics having slightly lower than the amount they graduate.

    Now the lower amounts of blacks and hispanics may very well be simply due to location. The companies they looked at are Silicon Valley companies, with the majority of their workforce in California. California has a much lower percentage of blacks than say Georgia, Mississippi, Alabama, etc... If you even slightly believe that the percentage of graduates are equally spread out across the nation's schools based on percentage of population in the schools, and that attendance in schools more closely mimics the population in the state (not always, there are historically african american shools as well women only or male only schools, and schools certain ethnicities would never even want to go to for many reasons), and take into consideration that most people will tend to stay close to home/family when searching for a job, and you will see that the breakdown of ethnicity in Silicon Valley tech companies is probably really not that out of step with the percentage of population in the labor market in Silicon Valley.

    --
    We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
  98. Re:Experience outside the valley--I agree by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 1

    Also, I would go further, and state that simply looking at bachelor degrees does not really do justice for the statistics for those being hired by the Silicon Valley firms. If you look at doctoral degrees in Computer and Information sciences, the breakdown is 73% white, 3% black, 10.7% asian, 4.5% hispanic, of which 71.4% are male, and 28.6% are female. This reflects MANY of the disparages in workforce makeup at these companies. These companies are supposedly the best of the best, and brightest of the brightest, which means it will reflect closely those same best of the best and brightest of the brightest coming out of the education system (which means doctorates, post-doctorates, etc.).

    --
    We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
  99. Re:Mod parent DOWN by worldthinker · · Score: 1

    Interesting ASSUMPTIONS you're making. Why do you think that?

  100. Re:Mod parent DOWN by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    He can fight against the pervasive drug and gang culture that keeps black kids away from any means to better themselves.

    You are confusing cause and effect. Most kids don't dream of becoming drug dealers, they simply have little choice because their schools suck and parents don't care.

    Jackson is making the point that there is talent available in the US, it just gets wasted due to lack of opportunity. Instead of lobbying for more H1B visas and employing overseas recruitment specialists the tech companies should be trying to fix the problems that prevent minorities getting the opportunity to work for them. Of course they won't do it without being forced to because business only ever does what is most profitable.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  101. Re:RACIST! by craigminah · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Likewise, tech doesn't attract young black men and women because studying math, science, tech, and computers in school isn't cool. We need to make it cool so everyone gets an education worth a dam in our country. Until then, placing minorities in positions because they're a minority is doing a disservice to those who actually study and do well in school and it puts underqualified people in positions which weakens our tech fields. It all goes back to families then schools,

  102. Re:What Jesse wants by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    So now questions like, "How does one measure the amount of water passing a particular point in a river?" or "Why can you not see the Moon during the day?" are being asked.

    Are you suggesting that it is okay for a Sysadmin to lack sufficient knowledge to answer those questions? Or that they are somehow discriminatory? I'm just not sure of your point here. I would be perfectly comfortable asking Sysadmin applicants these questions. (With the caveat that the moon is indeed sometimes visible during the day. That question is dumb. But asking why it's visible most nights is not. Interviewers can be stupid too.)

    I'm not claiming they weren't being discriminatory. Maybe they were. But that's weak evidence at best.

  103. Re:What Jesse wants by Snotnose · · Score: 1

    There have been questions of my ability to do what is on my resume that are legit.

    My typical modus operandi is to scan the resume for things I've done myself, the more obscure the better. I then target that in the interview. It's amazing how often people list crap on their resume that was done somewhere in the building, but not by themselves.

    For example, I spent about 4 years in the 80's working on the 1553 bus, and considered myself an expert on the protocol, the hardware, and the usage of the bus. A few years ago some idiot put 1553 on his resume but, in the interview, couldn't answer anything about it other than "the military uses it". No shit sherlock, that's my it's full name is MIL-SPEC-1553.

  104. Clarification: HE dodged a bullet by bADlOGIN · · Score: 1

    Sorry. Misread your statement. Guess I was just in so much shock from the notion of anyone actively using EJBs for anything.

    --
    *** Sigs are a stupid waste of bandwidth.
    1. Re:Clarification: HE dodged a bullet by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      Just to be clear, I don't think that I have seen an actual EJB in probably a decade. But when someone puts "expert" on his or her resume, then I need to ask about it.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    2. Re:Clarification: HE dodged a bullet by bADlOGIN · · Score: 1

      Got it. You had me worried there:)

      --
      *** Sigs are a stupid waste of bandwidth.
  105. My saddest interview by Snotnose · · Score: 1

    Around 2000 or so had a black guy in his 20s come in, dressed to the nines, well spoken, really likeable guy. I was his first interview and, when I met him in the lobby, he had an older white guy with him. hmmm. My interview technique is to start with softball questions to get them to relax, then get harder and harder questions. I don't want to stress them out, I want them to be themselves and give me an idea of what they know and how easy they will be to work with.

    This kid couldn't answer my softball question. Couldn't even try, he had no clue. Tried an easier question, utter failure. I kept dumbing down my questions, and it wasn't until we got to data types that he could, eventually, come up with an answer. He couldn't even answer questions from his resume.

    Thing was, as the interview went on I got to like this kid more and more. Really nice kid who seemed to have read a quick tutorial on C but had never so much as written a hello world.

    My guess is he was a disadvantaged kid who went to some program, the program did a week of classroom, no lab, wrote his resume, loaned him a suit, got him an interview, drove him there, and presented them as an experienced C programmer to companies.

  106. Tech Diversity Is Next Civil Rights Step by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I always thought the next step for civil rights was getting better proponents than Jesse Jackson.

  107. Re:Mod parent DOWN by Rigel47 · · Score: 1

    Sounds like this fellow followed a very beaten path of tech folk who decide to bypass college because a company wants them for their skills... and do not give a damn about their genital arrangement or skin pigmentation.

  108. Contradistory positions by BobandMax · · Score: 1

    Jackson and others routinely take the position that corporations are money grubbers that only care about profit. If that is true; why would they not hire a qualified candidate, regardless of ancestry? I strongly suspect, as another poster alluded, that this is a problem specific to Silicon Valley. But, it is clearly ripe for plundering by shakedown scammers like Jackson, who has perfected this sort of swindle to a high level.

    --

    "Computers are useless. They can only give you answers."
    -- Pablo Picasso
  109. Re:RACIST! by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

    There is a legitimate problem, though, that a disproportionate number of degree holding blacks aren't working in their field. The CEO of McDonald's is an EE. He's not doing bad for himself these days but you have to wonder why he couldn't establish a career as an engineer.

    --
    I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
  110. Re:What Jesse wants by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    1. No, he doesn't.
    2. You argue from popularity (all those liberals must be right).
    3. Insights are obvious once you have them.
    4. It doesn't require a completely unbiased take on the world to have a correct insight on one specific aspect. Hell, it doesn't even matter if you have unfounded biases about the subject in question. What matters in context is whether you're correct in that one instance.

    In this case, he is. Left wing politics is just as backstabby and self serving as neo-right politics. I find it laughable that the left wing organizations most well known for 'civil rights' are only defending the needs and whims of some, granting them de facto privilege over the rest. This applies across race, sex, orientation, and any other front these activists can cobble together (eg: anita sarkeesian, sarah sharp, rebecca watson, etc). If they were honorable, their actions would match their rhetoric about equal rights for everyone.

  111. Re:I sort of support what Jackson's saying, has me by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    "are all too accustomed to having "the prize" and opportunity dangled in front of them, and then snatched away once someone has got what they wanted from that black person"

    what in god's name are you babbling about? I almost find that offensive, like there is some fat white man with a tux, cigar, and a monocle saying dance for me and you can have some cornbread, oops too late!

    The prize is the same for everyone here, get smart, work hard and you will do just fine, and if anything we as Americans bend over backwards to give it to "minorities" aka black people with numerous programs, if they take advantage of it great, if not tough IMO

  112. Re:RACIST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Uh... he DID work as an engineer - for Northrop Grumman, and McDonald's. The fact that he's now CEO of McDonald's after several promotions and increasing responsibilities suggests that he *did* establish a career as an egineer, and it led to him being named CEO of a major multinational corporation.

    I suspect he's "established a career" as an engineer in a far more successful manner than you have.

  113. Obligatory post from KudyardRipling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Experience has shown that there exists an hierarchy of protected classes:

    1. Females espousing religions hostile to Western values
    2. Males espousing religions hostile to Western values
    3. Lesbians
    4. Gays
    5. African American female
    6. African American male
    7. Hispanic female
    8. Hispanic male
    9. Asian female
    10. Asian male
    11. Jewish female
    12. Jewish male
    13. Ethnic white female
    14. Ethnic white male
    15. Non-ethnic white female
    16. Non-ethnic white male
    17. White female
    18 White male
    19. Christian/Messianic Jew/Hebrew Christian/Talmidei Yeshua

    Religion is the essence of culture and culture is the dress of religion.

    Culture is defined as "the attempt to find a coherent set of answers to the existential questions that confront human beings in the passages in their lives".

    Only in the West is identity modular. One can change religions without invalidating an individual's claim to belong to a certain group (within limits). However, in the East, identity is considered a gestalt. Even the slightest alteration of any point no matter how minor it may appear renders that individual's claim to belong to a certain group invalid. This has real life consequences, especially in Israel. When a minority individual achieves beyond an unspoken threshold, they are reassigned as "white" for many purposes thus becoming "quasi-protected". Their membership in a protected class are only for matters negative (hate crimes) and not for matters positive (reservations, set-asides, affirmative action, positive discrimination, etc.).

  114. Jesse fail by LessThanObvious · · Score: 1

    While I'm happy to push companies to prefer local talent over H-1Bs, there is no civil rights issue in high tech. Tech companies are happy to hire any candidate with the skills appropriate for the job. The public education system is certainly failing our youth and junior colleges need to expand and modernize tech programs, those are places to focus on expanding access not just for minorities, but for everyone. Considering the bad PR they get if diversity percentages are a little off, believe me companies are not avoiding minority hires. As per the wisdom of SouthPark, "Jesse Jackson is not the emperor of black people" - Token Black

  115. What? by s.petry · · Score: 1

    Jackson and Sharpton both have livelihoods that depend on race issues. Both are known for race baiting, and have made careers doing just that. This is why even when no racial issues exist, they fabricate information to make them exist. These are not the only two that manipulate discrimination issues for cash. We saw recently that the NAACP will give bigots a lifetime achievement award, if the bigot gives enough money to the NAACP.

    That statement should not imply that real issues of discrimination do not exist, but rather that real issues of discrimination are diminished because of these types of people.

    It's not a shakedown for money, because that would only let you cash a check once. He wants constant racial issues, and instigates them when ever possible.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  116. Silicon Valley shakedown by Kariles70 · · Score: 1

    He could start by calling on Congress to get the corrupt H1-B Visa program cancelled. Thats the government program whereby companies import foreign citizens to do I.T. work for half or less than the current salary. It would also help everyone of every race.

  117. Re: What Jesse wants by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    How ironic that the "racial purity" types are totally unaware that us "northern white people" are in fact the bastard half-breeds of Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon. Of course, "hybrid vigor" is a well-known phenomenon... but you won't catch Darrel and his brother Darrel willing to acknowledge that; they'd rather find somebody to hate while they bang their sister... :p

  118. Re:Mod parent DOWN by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    You seem to think the institutions are racist because they wanted some "very sharp" kid to get a GED ?

    Not at all. I don't think the institutions are racist at all. I think they saw talent.

    And because of (and in some cases, despite) the efforts of people who have fought these fights for many decades, there are now such opportunities. There was a time, not that long ago, in my lifetime in fact, when this young man would have not gotten the opportunity because of the color of his skin and his station in life.

    Now his job is to make sure he gets as much out of them as they get out of him. That is the hard fight.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  119. Re:RACIST! by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    > tech doesn't attract young black men and women because studying math, science, tech, and computers in school isn't cool.

    No, because the jobs are all going offshore. And what isn't going offshore is being done by visa workers.

    The future for tech jobs in the USA is grim.

  120. Re:RACIST! by lgw · · Score: 1

    So, wait, the problem is that the wrong minorities are doing the jobs? This is complicated.

    There are plenty of open developer jobs in the US. Heck, we have several on my team we can't fill. I strongly suspect people complaining about this either just don't make the cut, or don't want to move to where the jobs are.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  121. Re:Mod parent DOWN by mattwarden · · Score: 1

    No, actually it is a little bit of an odd comment, although I don't know if it's "racism". If there are companies who are willing to hire people incapable of doing their jobs well, then obviously they will hire cheaper labor who suck over expensive labor who suck. So the only correlation here is wage requirements. Dumber developers earn less money, news at 11.

    To jump to generalizing H1Bs or Indian H1Bs is odd. I have worked with plenty of Indian H1Bs who were extremely intelligent and much better at their jobs than their peers at the company. They also were NOT cheap to employ.

  122. Re:Actually... by bjwest · · Score: 1

    [leaning over the bridge to talk to you...]

    I'm commenting on an internet forum, not writing a dissertation. I quickly read over my post to see if it makes sense and look for red squiggly underlines, then hit submit, or preview, here on /., and may or may not quickly read over it again before final submission. If you such a nerd, then you know damn well what I was saying. If this kind of mistake bothers you so much, add me to your ignore list and don't read my posts. You'll find many mistakes like this in my online posts, here and on other forums, and there will be more in the future. If I were getting paid to write, or writing something official, I'd take more care. I'm not, so read it or fuck off, makes no big fuck to me either way.

    --

    --- Keep the choice with the user..
  123. Re:RACIST! by napulist · · Score: 1

    Your thesis is ingenious. A fucking swiss watch, if i understand it correctly. Let me try to break it down here:

    The Problem:
    * Black people are not employed in the tech sector in representative numbers

    The Cause:
    * Black people only do things that are cool
    * Studying math/science/tech is NOT cool
    * Black people's families are also terrible

    The Solution:
    * Make education cool (It's the only way to motivate black people!)

    It's all so simple now.. so obvious. I mean, when you put it that way, even a black person might be able to understand it! (ha ha YEAH RIGHT, AMIRITE?? ha ha! they are so dumb!!!)

  124. Re:RACIST! by craigminah · · Score: 1

    That's a good point but why are these jobs going offshore? Is it because we can't do the jobs or is it because they can get the job done for less pay? Probably a combination of the two.

  125. Re:I sort of support what Jackson's saying, has me by BlackHeron717 · · Score: 1

    The prize is the same for everyone here, get smart, work hard and you will do just fine, and if anything we as Americans bend over backwards to give it to "minorities" aka black people with numerous programs, if they take advantage of it great, if not tough IMO

    Correction sir, what the hell are YOU talking about? Those programs are barely designed to level the playing field that is the byproduct of generations of gerrymandering and gentrification of black neighborhoods which disenfranchise them on the education level. Not even the internet has been able to level the education gap because service providers underserve minority neighborhoods.

  126. Re:What Jesse wants by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

    Was there a racial element to the interview? Probably, given that black men are very rare in IT and that people are not used to dealing with unusual things in many ways. However, these sound like typical dumbass "brainteaser" questions:

    So now questions like, "How does one measure the amount of water passing a particular point in a river?" or "Why can you not see the Moon during the day?" are being asked.

    The problem is they're not really brainteasers, in that they're fun "impossible" or "off the wall" questions.

    The first is a rather fun question and has had many solutions with a rather interesting history. If you've happened to done any civil engineering, then you may have covered streamflow measurement in which case the first answer is somewhat nuanced and based on the size of the river, number of measurements required and various other constraints.

    The second one is the old "why are manhole covers round" in that the question is outright wrong.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  127. Re:RACIST! by kwbauer · · Score: 1

    AC complaining about someone posting as AC. I'd say it is time for -2 IDIOT moderation to put these people in their places.

  128. Re:What Jesse wants by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

    Jesse Jackson is not a Black leader. He does not and never has spoken for Black people. He is self serving and always has been.
    However!
    As one of the few Black men in IT, I have to say it is prejudicial almost every time I interview for a position. I have over 15 years in IT. I have done Software Engineering; SQA Engineering; Systems Engineering and Technical Project Management. There have been questions of my ability to do what is on my resume that are legit. But I have had more than a few instances where it was obvious to me that the questions "all of a sudden" take a weird turn. I applied for a Systems Admin position, did really well on the phone technical screen. Came in for a face to face and things took a turn. Under the guise of "I just want to see how you think" questions that are usually asked to potential Software Developers are being asked. I handled the questions with ease (a good education AND experience as a Developer). The surprise on the face of interviewer was disheartening. I knew what was being attempted. So now questions like, "How does one measure the amount of water passing a particular point in a river?" or "Why can you not see the Moon during the day?" are being asked. I've asked more than a few of my IT colleagues if they have had these situations and not one has. The assumption that all Blacks are from the "Inner City" "the ghetto" or "Urban" and lack education is so wrong. There are many of us that are twice as good and make half as much because of the Supremacist entitlement that pervades this culture.

    A friend of mine runs, and has run for many years, the network department of a private bank in New York. He is black (oh, sorry Black) coming originally from Jamaica (the island not the borough).

    What he told me, back when I was working for him, is that in his opinion blacks in America tend to cause themselves problems that don't actually exist. He was quite worried, at the time, that his son would pick up the 'we are persecuted' mentality and drop his own level of achievement to try and fit in with the other black students in his school.

    I grew up in a home for children. We all had nothing and, arguably, we all had the same living environment growing up. I saw this exact thing happen with one of my 'brothers' who was black. He was living the same as me - same room, same money, same people around us. He went to the same schools that I did. The difference was that he picked up the 'we are persecuted' mentality and started acting black to fit in. Things only got worse from there, which I won't go into. The long and short of it is that I think that my friend from Jamaica is right. Even where there is no persecution, American blacks create problems for themselves.

    Obviously this is a generalization. There are plenty of successful black people who have never let themselves be stopped by anything - least of all themselves.

    --
    blindly antisocialist = antisocial
  129. Re:RACIST! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    The NBA values physical ability. Tech companies value mental ability. Are you saying that black people are inherently less intelligent than white people? It's a theory that has been researched and mostly rejected.

    I suppose you could argue for a programme to help stretch young white kids on some kind of medieval rack so that they are more competitive at basketball, in exchange for better schools and learning opportunities for young black kids.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  130. Re: RACIST! by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    Are you sure it's a problem and not a symptom?

  131. Re:RACIST! by Wootery · · Score: 1

    That's not something anyone in the technology sector can effect, though...

  132. Re:RACIST! by Raseri · · Score: 1

    (Not saying what that race was, as the problem was just a couple of assholes, and not a more general problem).

    Obviously, the preferred race was South Asian. Why bother being coy about it?

    --
    Writhe your naked ass to the mindless groove.
  133. Next Civil Rights Step. No, It Is Not. by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

    Tech Diversity Is Next Civil Rights Step

    Not, it is not. Instead of scrutinizing tech companies why they have low % of African American and Hispanic engineers (I'm a Hispanic engineer btw), they should scrutinize those communities (my community included) as of why they produce fewer %s of engineers compared to non-Hispanic Whites (or worse, against Asian/Asian American communities.)

    This is not a case of tech companies discriminating against X or Y ethnic group. It is about our communities doing a piss-poor job at ensuring our kids a proper education and get proper role models.

    Yes, Hispanic and African American communities have suffered systematic discrimination in the past (specially African Americans). But we past that point a long time ago, and the balance has been pointing towards community responsibility for quite some time.

    Jeese Jackson is an asshole and an attention whore. He is stirring up this shit, race baiting the tech industry as a means to stay relevant. Sadly, there will be enough dumb masses that follow him.

  134. Re:RACIST! by stdarg · · Score: 1

    The NBA values physical ability.

    Are you saying that white people are inherently less physically able than black people? How do you measure physical ability? There are physical sports where white people are overrepresented (like hockey), so let's not pretend that top white athletes are not competitive. It's entirely possible that there is systemic racism in basketball. Are childhood training dollars spent disproportionately in black communities? For instance I remember Clinton's midnight basketball program.. how many white kids showed up to that?

    Are there systemic racially biased issues with player selection? For instance, some players are recruited straight from high school. Blacks are less likely to go to college than whites, so this disproportionately helps blacks.

    What about the rules of basketball? Is there a systemic problem that gives an advantage to one race or culture?

    I'm like 75% serious about this, even though it started as a joke. These are the exact same things you hear people say about institutional racism against blacks in any area where whites seem to have an overrepresentation.

    Tech companies value mental ability. Are you saying that black people are inherently less intelligent than white people? It's a theory that has been researched and mostly rejected.

    It has been rejected as a matter of principle by the scientific community, not as a matter of fact. Most of the research I've seen is looking into why whites do better on intelligence tests, have higher academic performance, and better career performance (judged by employment numbers and salaries), etc, as an attempt to explain why these tests are biased against blacks. Some of the difference can be explained by adjusting for socioeconomic status, exposure to lead, etc.. but I've never seen a comprehensive explanation that accounts for the entire difference. And, uncharacteristic of traditional science, that unexplained difference is not accepted as legitimate, it is labeled as simply "not known YET."

  135. Re:What Jesse wants by HnT · · Score: 1

    Can't be long now before Spike Lee "discovers" this and squeezes a few "oh so controversial" movies out...

    --
    "Only one thing is impossible for God: To find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." - Mark Twain
  136. Re:RACIST! by rhazz · · Score: 1

    In my experience (Canadian government IT) if there is racism preventing black people getting jobs, it is happening before the job application process.

    I am a programmer working in an IT section with about 75 employees, and we do not have a single black person currently employed. And this is government, where being any official minority gives you a leg up on everyone else in the pool. We had a black testing consultant a several years back, and last year we had a black student. But otherwise we have many whites, asians, indians, and misc, all of varying qualities. In university (in the same city) my classrooms were a similar mix, also with very few black people. Of the black people I've encountered that work in this organization, almost all of them are on the business policy side, which usually means they are PhD's (veterinarians).

  137. Jesse Jackson? by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

    Would someone shut that race-bating, hypocritical piece of shit up already?

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  138. Re: RACIST! by iamhassi · · Score: 1

    This. The article was confusing, at first I thought he was against h-1b visas and wanted more Americans working, then it switched to not enough black programmers. There is a huge number of minorities working in the tech industry but it's not the black minority. Is Jesse Jackson supporting Americans or blacks only?

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  139. Re:RACIST! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    Are you saying that white people are inherently less physically able than black people? How do you measure physical ability? There are physical sports where white people are overrepresented (like hockey), so let's not pretend that top white athletes are not competitive. It's entirely possible that there is systemic racism in basketball. Are childhood training dollars spent disproportionately in black communities? For instance I remember Clinton's midnight basketball program.. how many white kids showed up to that?

    Statistically speaking there are more very tall black African Americans than white Americans. I'm not sure that statistically African Americans are dumber though, if you were to somehow measure raw intelligence and potential rather than academic results.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  140. Re:RACIST! by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    There is a legitimate problem, though, that a disproportionate number of degree holding blacks aren't working in their field. The CEO of McDonald's is an EE. He's not doing bad for himself these days but you have to wonder why he couldn't establish a career as an engineer.

    Maybe he didn't want to?

    I started out as a microwave engineer in military electronics. After several years I couldn't stand it anymore, learned me that there programming stuff and changed careers to IT. The engineer working next to me quit a year or so before I did. I hear he's fixing CB radios somewhere away from the madding crowd. It does happen, and by choice.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  141. Re:RACIST! by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    So, wait, the problem is that the wrong minorities are doing the jobs? This is complicated.

    There are plenty of open developer jobs in the US. Heck, we have several on my team we can't fill. I strongly suspect people complaining about this either just don't make the cut, or don't want to move to where the jobs are.

    It might depend on where you work. My manager stated publicly a couple years ago that he'll be concentrating on offshore contractors and H-1B applicants for all future hires for budgetary reasons. In those two years, partly do to regular churn, and partly due to people getting fed up and leaving, the racial characteristic of the department changed dramatically. So much so that the locals who are left are becoming concerned about their own future. Currently, people with visas and people remoting out of little towns east of Mumbai outnumber US citizens (of any race).

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  142. Re:RACIST! by stdarg · · Score: 1

    Statistically speaking there are more very tall black African Americans than white Americans.

    Height is only one factor to consider in a basketball player. If not, there isn't a shortage of tall white guys to put on the team. Problem is most tall people lack other characteristics that make a good basketball player.

    But let's say you're right. Whatever characteristics make a good basketball player, including height, are somehow more amply found in blacks. In another industry, a setup that catered to characteristics specific to one race would be called racist. These problems have easy solutions after all. For example, if white people aren't tall enough, then make basketball hoops shorter. There's no *reason* they're so tall, it's arbitrary and according to you tilts the field in favor of one race over others.

    I'm not sure that statistically African Americans are dumber though, if you were to somehow measure raw intelligence and potential rather than academic results.

    Forget raw intelligence, we don't need it in this discussion. Let's say a company or school screens applicants not on "raw intelligence" but on "how well you do on SATs" or "what your high school GPA is." Perfectly objective measures, just like height. It would be the same standard, applied equally to everyone. But people call it racist because the SATs are culturally biased against blacks. It's arbitrary, just like some of the tests the NBA has (like height). It has different outcomes based on race, just like the NBA.

    Are you okay with that, as long as we add the caveat that it's measuring the applicants performance on the SAT, not raw intelligence?

  143. Too little, too late? by carys689 · · Score: 1

    Mr. Jackson apparently has run out of other things to crab about, so he is going to start crabbing about the lack of diversity in high-tech. U.S. affirmative action has been around for over 50 years and during that time there has been enormous opportunity for blacks and other minorities to get an edge on education, often at the disadvantage of more qualified whites, and improve their ability to get better paying jobs whether it is in high-tech or elsewhere. By and large, for whatever the reasons, with relatively rare exceptions, the black/non-white community, in general, has failed to avail themselves of this. To claim racial discrimination at this point is ludicrous.

  144. Yes. As long as he supports whites in the NBA. by yenic · · Score: 1

    As long as this also have a simultaneous effort to promote opportunity for whites in the NBA, then I'm all for it.

    Also, I like the cut of his anti-H1B jib. But as long as we're identifying areas where the white community is under served as well. I'd recommend starting with the NBA.
    It's not a lack of talent, it's a lack of opportunity.

    --
    http://www.accountkiller.com/en/delete-slashdot-account Stop visiting Slashdot.
  145. Re:RACIST! by lgw · · Score: 1

    Development is a global market, and the work can be done anywhere. Best get used to that fact, as it won't change. However, demand still exceeds supply and supply is fully online worldwide: every university worldwide with a credible CS program, and quite a few with dubious ones, are being recruited from now, and have been for years. The workforce was growing exponentially 10 years ago, as new nations were opening up, but is growing linearly now and demand is still strong. It's one of the best paying jobs in every country now. Nothing to complain about.
     

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  146. Re:What Jesse wants by MooseMiester · · Score: 1

    Thank you so much for having the courage to speak up on this topic on /.

    I so hope the young wet behind the ears passionate naive millennials who actually believe the propaganda spewed by the so called civil rights leaders on MSNBC... Propaganda carefully crafted to make people angry and send money to greedy people who only have their own self interest at heart... These people do not speak for the majority of blacks, nor do they represent black culture, nor are they doing blacks any favors.

    I have personally seen racism in many forms it makes me sick. Literally physically sick.

    --
    Murphy was an optimist
  147. Re:Mod parent DOWN by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 1

    I really admire the way the CEO of Cypress Semiconductor refused to knuckle under to Jackson back in 2001 after Jackson labeled Cypress a "white supremacist hate group.’” I hope every Silicon Valley target of his does the same.

    T. J. Rodgers. One of my very favorite comments on Jesse Jackson ever: "Jesse Jackson is like a seagull. He flies in, craps all over everything, then flys out again."

  148. Re: RACIST! by Raseri · · Score: 1

    tech companies are functionally closer to strict meritocracies

    This would in no way explain the huge numbers of South Asians in their employ. The strange thing is, black or Latino Americans could be hired almost as cheaply as Indians, so the preference is to crapflood the market with imported labor in order to push down wages overall. Usually, he is indeed a shakedown artist, but in this case, Jackson is on the right track.

    --
    Writhe your naked ass to the mindless groove.
  149. Re:RACIST! by erikkemperman · · Score: 1

    Ok, so who IS fighting racism? Because just looking at some of the posts in this thread, it needs fighting.

    --
    Gosh, thanks. That must be why the other ships call me Meatfucker -- GCU Grey Area (Eccentric)
  150. Re:RACIST! by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    > Development is a global market, and the work can be done anywhere. Best get used to that fact, as it won't change.

    I understand that, and I have no problems competing on merit. But I'm still here (at this time) seeing the quality of the people we are hiring, and there is a definite trend to go on price rather than capabilities. We are hiring programmers that have zero experience with the tools they have been hired to use. I'm having to baby them, not through our work environment, methods and procedures, but basic things like how to log into the tool and how to open a project.

    There seems to be a school of thought that ten offshore programmers at $5/hour are better than one local programmer at $50/hour. There are rare cases where this is true, but it generally isn't for long -- true expertise will move on as soon as a better offer becomes available. What often happens (what's happening right now) is that the $5/hour programmers not only aren't productive, they drag down the productivity of the remaining personnel who actually know what they're doing.

    But managers can show that development costs are down, so the trend continues.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  151. Re:I sort of support what Jackson's saying, has me by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    oh and the poor non minority neighborhoods are not also under-served? I just find it interesting that there are 1 million and 1 programs to serve area's like inner city minorities as if there aint a poor white kid living in the ghetto as well

  152. Re:RACIST! by dave.leigh7335 · · Score: 1

    So your theory is what? That blacks are too smart to see what whites have missed? Sorry, guy, but IT is filled to the brim with minorities, and jobs on-shore are everywhere. And yes, many are filled with H1-B visas, but it is clearly not a racism problem, nor is it an opportunity problem. Look at the number of black applicants for tech jobs. Look at the number of black students majoring in STEM. Who's missing? Failure to capitalize on opportunities is not equivalent to the nonexistence of those opportunities, and you can't bitch your way into them either. These are jobs that demand productive output... results. And it's too easy to know whether somebody writes code or designs tech that works, so nobody skates and stays employed. The solution is -- to put it bluntly -- to stop laughing at Urkel and play up how cool and desirable these jobs are. To capitalize on the opportunities takes real skill, and that takes real work. So your TARGET of a campaign can not be the industry. That's just planning to fail. The target must be young students, and they must be targeted LONG before they get to college.

  153. Re:What Jesse wants by NewYork · · Score: 1

    Don't pay taxes. Tell your regime to go and PRINT dollars for its Extravagance.

  154. Re: RACIST! by jimmyfrank · · Score: 1

    Grim? 120/hr right now, hope it stays grim is that's what it's called now.

  155. Re:The root of the problem is culture & social by strikethree · · Score: 1

    Peers discourage each other from studying because it's "acting white." When in fact it is "acting middle class," because this same kind of discouragement occurs among lower class whites as well.

    "Acting middle class" is merely another way of describing yourself as a servant. They have correctly identified that we are all servants and that the best that they can hope for is to be marginally better off than some others. This is a total ripoff and they know it. There is an ENORMOUS amount of wealth out there and 90% or more of us will never get to touch even a small amount of it. Why work so hard for so little? Fuck it, be a gangsta and live free (until you go to prison).

    --
    "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen