Slashdot Mirror


Students From States With Faster Internet Tend To Have Higher Test Scores

An anonymous reader sends word of correlation found between higher internet speeds and higher test scores. Quoting: The numbers—first crunched by the Internet provider comparison site HSI — show a distinct trend between faster Internet and higher ACT test scores. On the high end, Massachusetts scores big with an average Internet speed of 13.1Mbps, and an average ACT test score of 24.1. Mississippi, on the other hand, has an average speed of just 7.6Mbps and an average score of 18.9.

In between those two states, the other 48 fall in a positive correlation that, while not perfect, is quite undeniable. According to HSI's Edwin Ivanauskas, the correlation is stronger than that between household income and test scores, which have long been considered to be firmly connected to each other. The ACT scores were gathered from ACT.org, which has the official rankings and averages for the 2013 test, and the speed ratings were taken from Internet analytics firm Akamai's latest report.

27 of 175 comments (clear)

  1. Simple conclusion.... by wbr1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Faster internet access means faster internet search results when cheating. Therefore the internet should be banned. /s

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
  2. Cheating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Cheating over dial-up sucks!

  3. Correlation is not causation by mcl630 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The usual /. refrain of correlation is not causation definately applies here. Mississippi had low test scores long before broadband Internet came along.

    1. Re:Correlation is not causation by PPH · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yep.

      Low test scores correlate with low income. Low income correlates with not affording premium services.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:Correlation is not causation by bobbied · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe - smarter people have faster internet ?

      Naw, My connection is 25Mbps/25Mbps (Up from 5Mbps/2Mbps) and I didn't get any smarter.... In fact, I sometimes think it was a dumb move as my wallet sure seems lighter these days.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    3. Re:Correlation is not causation by mrchaotica · · Score: 4, Informative

      [Immigrants aside, apparently, it's "Take that, Georgia!']

      You think Georgia doesn't have a lot of immigrants? It's got a higher percentage than New Mexico (9.5% vs 9.2%)!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    4. Re:Correlation is not causation by Pfhorrest · · Score: 2, Informative

      Correlation does not imply causation, but causation does imply correlation.

      If A causes B, then A will also correlate with B. It's only the reverse that's false. (A correlating with B doesn't mean A causes B).

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    5. Re: Correlation is not causation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's also worth noting that ACT scores may not be the best metric for success.

      In some states it's mandatory for high school students to take the ACT, which may lead to lower state averages (technically those lower averages are more accurate for the whole population, but still don't compare directly with states where only the best students take the test).

      Moreover, SAT is more popular on the coasts. Many of my high-achieving friends (think West Coast Ivy League) never even took the ACT. With that in mind, how can we say that the high scores in MA are truly representative of the general population?

    6. Re:Correlation is not causation by NotDrWho · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Who woulda done thunk that one of the poorest states in the Union would also have shitty broadband and shitty test scores? I bet they have crazy high infant mortality, shitty health in general, and a high per-capita crime rate too.

      Maybe the high infant mortality rate is what caused the shitty broadband.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    7. Re: Correlation is not causation by afgam28 · · Score: 2

      That's true but the article (and even the summary) says that the correlation with internet speed is stronger than with income. So there may be more to it than just rich people can afford premium services.

      Maybe families that value education more strongly are more likely to get broadband, or maybe there's is actually some causation.

    8. Re:Correlation is not causation by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 3, Informative

      I bet they have crazy high infant mortality, shitty health in general, and a high per-capita crime rate too.

      Per capita violent crime in MS ranks considerably below the national average (299 per 100K as opposed to 474 nationally (2006 figures)).

      Massachusetts, New York, and California all have violent crime rates rather higher than the national average....

      As does the District of Columbia (over three times the national average, nearly twice that of the highest State).

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    9. Re:Correlation is not causation by i+kan+reed · · Score: 5, Interesting

      No, causation can actually have a negative correlation, surprisingly.

      It's relatively easy to generate cases where X can be caused by 2 different things, but the majority case simply has a stronger effect, if you don't account for mediating factors.

      Let's take a case where everything is controlled by people so cause can be quite directly ascribed.
      Applying for US citizenship causes US citizenship.
      But among residents of the US, those applying for US citizenship are far less likely to end up being citizens than those who don't.

    10. Re:Correlation is not causation by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Low income means that parent[s] need to work longer hours and spend less time with their children. Family time has a profound impact on education.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    11. Re:Correlation is not causation by war4peace · · Score: 2

      For fuck's sake... where in TFS or TFA was causation mentioned?
      Having a correlation between two data sets opens the door for more research on that matter. Nobody said "THIS is because of THAT", but rather "THIS and THAT scale similarly, hmm..." which is a totally different thing.

      So this finding might be further correlated with the following:

      - given the same amount of time spent on the Internet (say 1h/day as base value), the amount of information retrieved from the Internet scales with broadband speed.
      correlated with
      - saving said information for later review (e.g. e-books, audiobooks, video files) increases the amount of information available offline which initially came from online sources.
      correlated with
      - the average wait time before someone gets bored and closes a potentially helpful webpage which for some reason doesn't load quickly enough.

      Et caetera.

      I agree that this simple correlation is not causation, but a web of such positive correlations might as well lay the foundation for an undeniable causation.

      One more thing: for the love of _$deity_, don't look at historical datasets! Comparing the 80s data with current data is comparing apples and oranges.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    12. Re:Correlation is not causation by jfengel · · Score: 2

      Yeah, violent crime seems to go with density, rather than poverty. It's committed by the poor, but closely-packed poor rather than rural poor.

      DC is ALL urban, every single inch of it, so it's not really appropriate to compare it to a state. It's mid-pack compared to other cities of comparable size; it fell between Indianapolis and Miami on the 2012 list (http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2012), and near Toledo and Nashville.

      More urban states have higher violent crime rates, but it's centered in the urban cores. States with fewer cities will have lower violent crime rates, even though they may have more, poorer poor people. A lot of it, I gather, is drug related; I know that rural areas have their own drug problems but the distribution networks lead to a kind of organized violent crime.

  4. sorry by pezpunk · · Score: 4, Funny
    --
    i could live a little longer in this prison
    1. Re:sorry by pezpunk · · Score: 4, Informative

      I mean somehow I doubt better access to broadband is going to solve Mississippi's education problems. I'm willing to bet Massachusetts kids were trouncing Mississippi kids long before the internet came along.

      --
      i could live a little longer in this prison
    2. Re:sorry by mythosaz · · Score: 3, Informative

      True.

      Back in '92, Mississippi was at the absolute bottom 50 of 50 in basic prose literacy. [Sates with high immigration have since pushed them up to #42..]

      In '92, Mass was in the middle of the pack, at about half as many illiterate residents.

      http://nces.ed.gov/naal/estima...

    3. Re:sorry by mlts · · Score: 2

      There is also the fact that Mississippi is a lot larger than Massachusetts. It is easy to build high quality Internet connections in a state that is small, with almost all of its population concentrated on the eastern side. A larger state with less population, and population that is more scattered, with the biggest town being about 1/20 the size of Boston makes it a lot more expensive to sling fiber and provide access to residents, especially in a state with such a relatively low population density.

    4. Re:sorry by plover · · Score: 2

      Interesting idea, but the data doesn't support it.

      While Massachusetts has 858 people per square mile, the population density of Minnesota, 68.1, is almost identical to Mississippi, with 63.7 people per square mile.

      U.S. Census data also shows a significantly higher percentage of residents with internet connectivity in both Minnesota and Massachusetts, and significantly lower percentage in Mississippi. (Sorry, the source, http://www.census.gov/prod/201..., doesn't list the exact percentages, but I'm sure they'd be available if they were relevant.)

      If density were that much of a factor, I would expect the states with similar density to have similar connectivity rates. The data doesn't bear that out.

      Comparing the average ACT scores of the three states, Massachusetts comes in at 24.1, Minnesota at 22.8, and Mississippi at 18.7. Minnesota is closer to Massachusetts than Mississippi.

      It's also worth noting that Minnesota's more recent governors have made statewide high speed internet a priority to help grow the economy.

      --
      John
  5. Re:Idiotic corrolation by bobbied · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's paramount to the "corn-flake effect". Many people who are involved in car accidents actually ate corn flakes for breakfast. How scary is that?!??

    I'll bet almost all of them drank something with H2O in it within the last 24 hours too! It's time we ban this stuff.... For the children!!!

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  6. Data Mining. by Atzanteol · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is data mining. If you compare enough things you'll find strange correlations. There is little plausible reason to believe there is an actual causal relationship here.

    These are also "irrefutable correlations":

    US spending on science, space, and technology correlates with Suicides by hanging, strangulation and suffocation:
    http://www.tylervigen.com/view...

    Number people who drowned by falling into a swimming-pool correlates with Number of films Nicolas Cage appeared in
    http://tylervigen.com/view_cor...

    Per capita consumption of cheese (US) correlates with Number of people who died by becoming tangled in their bedsheets:
    http://tylervigen.com/view_cor...

    --
    "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

    - Charles Darwin
    1. Re:Data Mining. by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      Per capita consumption of cheese (US) correlates with Number of people who died by becoming tangled in their bedsheets

      There may be a real cause/effect correlation there, but if so, I don't want to know what it is.

  7. Simple conclusion.... brain implants work. by swschrad · · Score: 2

    the Borg is more cohesive with faster Internet. we are closer every day to domination.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  8. I'm guessing someone is aching to call RACISM by gelfling · · Score: 2

    Faster internet - more affluent - not black, etc etc etc

  9. Follow The Money by allquixotic · · Score: 2

    You can stop at "more $". That's the real reason why students in MA do better than students in MS.

    Not money that's used to buy kids iPads or Surfaces, mind you. Money that's spent to modernize schools built in the 1960s, or tear them down entirely and put up new ones. Money that's spent to pay teachers more, and attract better teaching talent. Money that's spent on the community and infrastructure to make teachers want to live there.

    Also, it's much more profitable for the private companies that "public" education relies on these days, when they have a higher density of students in schools. It's simply not practical to have as many students in a school in rural MS as it is in a school in urban MA. The urbanites get better educations because the private companies that do fund raisers, home and school internet connectivity, buses, general contracting on the buildings, etc. are making more money when they have more students in one place. It's the same reason why Verizon rolled out FiOS to the top 30% most densely populated suburbs and left the rest in the dark.

    You can't trust private corporations to do anything other than act in their own self interest. The public sector as originally conceived was supposed to fill in the gaps, working under the assumption that all human citizens of the great USA deserve the same opportunity to have access to high quality education and thus high quality jobs. But such an assumption requires you to accept that each human being is meritorious of their own moral standing, just by virtue of the fact that they exist and are living and breathing. Corporations aren't people, and they don't assign any moral standing to anything except their bottom line.

    We wanted nice things and we got exactly what we wanted. But you see, if you're not living in urban America, you aren't worthy of moral concern because you aren't worth enough money to our corporate benefactors.

    The message is awfully clear. If you want a chance to prosper in today's economy, jam yourself in a tiny apartment and bleat through the herd of thousands through the doors of your local well-funded school. Welcome to The Haves Caste, USA, citizen. You are entity number 126,438,921.

  10. Fatally flawed study by twistedcubic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The students who take the ACT are not necessarily representative of the state's population. For example, I took the SAT, and not the ACT, because all the colleges I applied to accepted SAT results, but not all accepted ACT results. Students who were going to the local state school just took the ACT alone. I bet the reverse is true in different states. It doesn't take much thought to see these results are totally meaningless.