Slashdot Mirror


Dell's New Alienware Case Goes to Extremes To Prevent Overheating

MojoKid writes Dell's enthusiast Alienware brand has always stood out for its unique, other-worldly looks (sometimes good, sometimes, not so good) and there's such a thing as taking things to the next level, this might be it. However, there's more to this refresh than just shock value. It's actually a futuristic aesthetic with a rather purposeful design behind it. Today Alienware gave a sneak peek at their completely redesigned Alienware Area 51 desktop system. This refreshed system is unlike any previous Alienware rig you've seen. With a trapezoidal shape to its chassis, Dell-Alienware says you can place the Area-51 against a wall and not have to worry about thermals getting out of the control. That's because there's a controlled gap and a sharp angle to the chassis that ensures only a small part of the system actually rests near the wall, leaving extra room for hot air to escape up and away. This design also offers users easy access to rear IO ports. Despite the unique design, there's plenty of room for high end components inside. The retooled chassis can swallow up to three 300W double-wide full-length graphics cards. It also brings to the table Intel's latest and greatest Haswell-E in six-core or eight-core options, liquid cooled and nestled into Intel's X99 chipset. No word from Dell on the price but the new Area-51 is slated to start shipping in October.

31 of 149 comments (clear)

  1. Ineffective advertising by rebelwarlock · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The only way this could have been more blatant of an advertisement is if they had put in a preorder link. Even if it wasn't, their "controlled gap" is just a corner that juts out so you can't push it up against the wall properly. It's just not very impressive in terms of, well, anything.

    Besides, I'm pretty sure the slashdot crowd builds their own rigs anyway.

    1. Re:Ineffective advertising by Charliemopps · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The only way this could have been more blatant of an advertisement is if they had put in a preorder link. Even if it wasn't, their "controlled gap" is just a corner that juts out so you can't push it up against the wall properly. It's just not very impressive in terms of, well, anything.

      Besides, I'm pretty sure the slashdot crowd builds their own rigs anyway.

      So lets tare it apparent instead:
      1. It's hideously ugly
      2. That vent design will make removing dust and pethair from the vents nearly impossible.
      3. It's a non-standard form fact, a lot of hardware will not fit in it at all.
      4. The PSU is at the bottom, heat rises, and directly above it they have the SLI video cards. This is a terrible design.
      5. It's small and cramped... which I'd expect from a portable design for lan parties... but it's too awkward to carry.

    2. Re:Ineffective advertising by asylumx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm anything BUT an Apple fan, but I think their new design for the Mac Pro is better looking and probably more functional from a shape perspective than this idea from Alienware. Glad to see manufacturers trying new things, but I hope they keep looking.

    3. Re:Ineffective advertising by LookIntoTheFuture · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm anything BUT an Apple fan, but I think their new design for the Mac Pro is better looking and probably more functional from a shape perspective than this idea from Alienware. Glad to see manufacturers trying new things, but I hope they keep looking.

      That thing makes me want to start smoking again so I could ash in it.

      --
      Brave Sir Robin ran away. ("No!") Bravely ran away away. ("I didn't!")
    4. Re:Ineffective advertising by goarilla · · Score: 3, Insightful

      4. The PSU is at the bottom, heat rises, and directly above it they have the SLI video cards. This is a terrible design.

      The PSU at the bottom is pretty much the standard these days.
      It makes room for top vents or a radiator that way. And the heath output of the PSU is so minimal
      compared to other parts that it's probably the best place for the PSU.

    5. Re: Ineffective advertising by goarilla · · Score: 4, Informative

      Oh really CM 690 III (it's a popular case -- they made three versions of it):
      http://www.coolermaster.com/ca...

      Antec 280:
      http://www.antec.com/product.p...

      Same deal with a high end Lian Li PC-A79:
      http://www.lian-li.com/en/dt_p...

    6. Re:Ineffective advertising by fa2k · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So we should compare this announcement with the Mac Pro one. Apple had to share a slashdot article between the MacBook and the Mac Pro. There's not many complaints about slashvertisement on the mac post.

      The post about the Mac appears just as positive, but it packs a lot more facts in fewer sentences, so it's arguably better. Both have their share of marketing language and fluff, but the Alienware has a lot more of it.

    7. Re: Ineffective advertising by X0563511 · · Score: 2

      Mine's got the PSU on bottom, but it does have the intake (with a removable hair screen) on the bottom, raised pegs, and the exhaust on back. Meaning that the PSU doesn't blow hot air anywhere inside the case.

      Tons of airflow on this case, even with the fans on the lowest setting my CPU fan hardly ever needs to spin fast.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    8. Re:Ineffective advertising by Misagon · · Score: 2

      Funny how everyone called it a "trash can" ... until they saw how small it was. Then they started calling it an "ash tray".

      I thought the unified thermal core was genius... until I heard that it actually runs pretty hot.
      The graphics card have to be custom-made for the Mac Pro, and you can't put a mechanical drive inside, which limits performance for video editing. Yet again Apple's own overpriced accessories are the only ones that fit.
      I'm not saying that the Alienware trapezoid/pentagon isn't more ridiculous. I think the older Mac Pro was a better design than both of them.

      --
      "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
    9. Re:Ineffective advertising by sudon't · · Score: 2

      I am an Apple fan, and the new Mac Pro is the first design in a long time that I haven't liked. The old aluminum enclosure looked a lot nicer. This one looks PCish to me, in spite of being round. Maybe it's the color of the plastic? I prefer my ashtrays in amber glass on a brass pedestal.

      --
      -- sudon't

      Air-ride Equipped

    10. Re:Ineffective advertising by geekoid · · Score: 2

      1. I disagree.
      2. No more then it is now. Pop open the top, and blow it out.
      3. As nears as I can tell, the motherboard isn't standard, but everything else is.
      4. Clearly you didn't pay attention to how it removes heat. Having the weight at the bottom is better.
      5. lan parties. Cute.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    11. Re:Ineffective advertising by geekoid · · Score: 2

      For that price, you can get far more powerful PCs.
      In fact, you could get several PC and create a mini farm.

      OTOH, it's for a graphic designer, so pretty of substance.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  2. Re:How much? by Aryeh+Goretsky · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hello,

    Dell didn't pay anything for it, as far as I can tell.

    This is a post by MojoKid, who operates the HotHardware.Com site. I'm guessing he submitted the article to Slashdot in order to get some ad revenue from people visiting his site as a result.

    I'm guessing that blocking

    googletagservices.com
    googleusercontent.com
    tru.am

    before visiting his site will make that a little more difficult.

    I do not know if he is a Slashdot or a Dice Holdings, Inc., employee, but it would be nice if there was some sort of transparency statement, if that's the case.

    Regards,

    Aryeh Goretsky

    --
    Dexter is a good dog.
  3. "Against a wall" by Noughmad · · Score: 5, Informative

    In other words, it's ok to place this directly agains the wall, because the shape ensures it cannot be placed agains the wall. Well done.

    --
    PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
    1. Re:"Against a wall" by v1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In other words, it's ok to place this directly agains the wall, because the shape ensures it cannot be placed agains the wall. Well done.

      That's actually completely accurate. Towers do tend to get placed under desks, or more commonly, in a corner where the desk meets the wall. Ventillatoin back there is crap, and the system overheats. So rather than make another case that will just generate a lot more support calls and broken harware in warranty, they just made it physically impossible to keep installing it like retard.

      y'know... for their retarded customers ;)

      Knowing your customer is key to a successful business.

      But all sarcasm aside, I do like the new design. I'm a mac fan but I can see some thought went into this both for functionality and for original and interesting design. Even if they fail at both, at least they're trying. It's not just another boring beige / black box.

      I think the biggest concern for me though would be how much floor space this is going to take up, plus how little or zero space there is to set anything on it. I don't even think you could set the keyboard aside on it without risking it falling over. And imagine the users setting drinks on top of it! At least with a box, if you knock your drink over, it's on the floor. HERE.... it can drain your entire soda into the mobo ports (back) or fan intake. (front) I think that will be the biggest problem this case has, getting users out of the habbit of setting things on top of their case.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    2. Re:"Against a wall" by TeknoHog · · Score: 2

      imagine the users setting drinks on top of it! At least with a box, if you knock your drink over, it's on the floor. HERE.... it can drain your entire soda into the mobo ports (back) or fan intake. (front)

      Moreover, I imagine this feature will increase dust buildup. Of course you get plenty of dust along the airstream, no matter what direction, but in this case (pun intended) there's a constant buildup from above, even when the machine is off. Then when you turn the machine on again, you get this nice layer of dust sucked in at once.

      To avoid these types of problem, I'd rather have an indentation on the back, leaving room for air even when the top is pushed against the wall. It will be somewhat worse for natural convection, though. Then again it might help when lifting the machine up.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  4. Trapezoidal shape? by Ecuador · · Score: 2

    Before clicking the link I was trying to imagine how a trapezoidal shape could help and I could not. Well, that's because it is a hexagon. Sure, not a regular one, as the article says "like a triangle but with twice as many sides", and even more complicated than that (half the sides are hexagonal themselves, the other half rectangular), but I would not call it "trapezoidal" unless I did not know what that meant.
    That said, yes, you can push it to the wall, but due to its shape it is actually longer (at its lower part) than a rectangular case would be, so you would be able to leave enough space behind with a rectangular case if you set it so that its front is at the same place where this hexagon reaches when it is all the way back to the wall. If they wanted to actually save space perhaps they could get air from the sides and out from the top on a rectangular shape (along with ports etc)? I don't know, I'm just saying.

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
  5. Corsair Air 540 by Mistakill · · Score: 2

    I bought one of these, and between it and the Corsair H110, i don't even have any case fans on... the case has good ventilation at the top, and front... the case will be a fair bit cheaper than the premium alienware would be charging too

  6. Chill out - I dig it by water-and-sewer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't know why there's so much hatred about this being a slashvertisement. I actually like articles about new hardware - it's one of the reasons I still visit sites like this.

    I dig the new machine, and totally support people looking into alternative and hopefully improved/innovative designs. This thing looks cool.

    You guys will figure that out when you calm down a bit.

    --
    If this were Usenet, I'd killfile the lot of you.
  7. Re:How much? by MojoKid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm guessing that blocking

    googletagservices.com googleusercontent.com tru.am

    before visiting his site will make that a little more difficult.

    I do not know if he is a Slashdot or a Dice Holdings, Inc., employee, but it would be nice if there was some sort of transparency statement, if that's the case.

    Regards,

    Aryeh Goretsky

    Seriously? Why do people that read a legitimate news story always try to assume something is advertising. This was a press coordinated announcement by Dell-Alienware. It's a VERY cool case and system design I think, so I submitted our story on it. Yes, I run HotHardware.com and no it's not even close to an advertisement. It's just our usual news coverage on a variety of topics around the computing space. Alienware had a press release on this new system design and we covered it, along with many other Tech news outlets I'm sure.

    And ad blocking. Don't even get me started. So many ad blockers are so proud of what they do, like it's some badge of honor to block. If everyone blocked ads, many quality web sites would likely cease to exist, including Slashdot. Just because you can block, doesn't mean you should. The internet is no different than any other media, where ads pay the bills to keep the lights on and people employed to serve up news, reviews and other content you enjoy every day, essentially for free.

    And good sites (like Slashdot and HotHardware) know how to separate church and state, where advertising does not affect editorial opinion.

  8. Re:So why dont cases breathe out the top? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Anecdote: I knew a student who had a self-built computer, with a top fan exhaust (and a very high CFM fan, a Delta I think!). He had a bit too much to drink one night, and threw up in exactly the wrong direction, straight on top of his PC...

    Extra comedy: His PC survived, because the Delta threw the vomit right back in his face.

    Perhaps this is why.

  9. Re:How much? by phantomfive · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Seriously? Why do people that read a legitimate news story always try to assume something is advertising

    It helps to increase that assumption when in the next paragraph you defend ad-block passionately.

    If ads were guaranteed to be malware free, then I wouldn't block them, but ad-tech companies are more interested in vetting inventory than advertisers (because advertiser are the ones who pay, so ad-tech companies put a lot of effort into making sure they get a good product).

    FWIW I thought your post was interesting.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  10. Re:How much? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2

    And ad blocking. Don't even get me started. So many ad blockers are so proud of what they do, like it's some badge of honor to block. If everyone blocked ads, many quality web sites would likely cease to exist, including Slashdot.

    I suspect in reality that the best sites would continue, but there would be a lot more paywalls around, probably less editorial integrity on open sites as things like product placements and affiliate referral fees became more reliable revenue streams, and maybe over time we'd eventually get somewhere with micropayments. In some ways, moving to more "honest" funding via paywalls and/or micropayments might be a better long-term model for the people who do produce good content and run valuable sites than what we have today, though no doubt it would be a painful transition with many casualties.

    The thing that makes me a little sad inside is that the aggressive, irresponsible advertisers have spoiled the model for the moderate, responsible ones. Because of the former group, I do block very aggressively when I'm browsing, and I don't feel any guilt about it because my motivations are security, privacy and performance. However, I also have no problem with people who just want to make a bit of money from running a decent site, and I wouldn't block their ads if there were a reliable way to allow those while still eliminating the rest. Unfortunately, I don't see that being possible any time soon, which is why none of the commercial sites I've ever run myself has relied on ads as a business model.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  11. Your bad business model isn't my problem by sjbe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why do people that read a legitimate news story always try to assume something is advertising.

    Because there is a large number of the tinfoil hat crowd here. Unfortunately they aren't always wrong. There are sometimes stories that really are just PR in disguise. I've certainly seen a few of them slip through here on slashdot. I agree that this particular instance probably isn't PR but I can see that it might be hard to be sure.

    If everyone blocked ads, many quality web sites would likely cease to exist, including Slashdot. Just because you can block, doesn't mean you should.

    It also doesn't mean that I have some obligation to watch the ads, particularly given the privacy baggage that tends to come with them. I come to slashdot to read the content, not to watch ads or let companies track my every move. Your bad business model is not my problem. If I value what you have then I will pay for it. I pay for several magazines as well as subscriptions to several online media services I find valuable to me. Frankly most online ad services are invasive to the point of being creepy as hell. Why on earth would I support that in any way? Advertising companies are generally invasive and seem to have no clue about when they've crossed the line. If they had any ethical compass I might be more lenient but I regularly see interviews with people involved in the online ad industry and they regard website viewers like a rancher views a side of beef. No respect whatsoever.

    The internet is no different than any other media, where ads pay the bills to keep the lights on and people employed to serve up news, reviews and other content you enjoy every day, essentially for free.

    Media funds through ads because it is easy but it is hardly the only means available. If you want to take advantage of the easy money don't be shocked when you get pushback. Newspapers are shriveling up because they built a business model based on a distribution monopoly and easy advertising dollars. Now that the distribution monopoly is broken by the internet their business model no longer allows monopoly profits. Your business is no different and if your business model is based on people being dumb enough to not block advertising that has a blatant disregard for privacy then I have no sympathy for you.

    And good sites (like Slashdot and HotHardware) know how to separate church and state, where advertising does not affect editorial opinion.

    The problem is that it sometimes is hard to tell the difference. Given that fact I would be a fool not to take control of my own privacy given that I have the means.

  12. I'm not always stupid and rich ... by geekoid · · Score: 4, Funny

    but when I am, I buy Alienware.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  13. Re:32GB by geekoid · · Score: 2

    False. Very few Application use more then a few gigs.
    Some do, and that's great, but for 95+% of users, it would just be wasted.
    This isn't 1993

    It's math.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  14. Re:How much? by davester666 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Um "press coordinated announcement by Dell-Alienware" == advertisement

    and making a press release appear to be a review [also known as "branded content"] is a violation of church and state

    but it's the new thing to get a few extra sheckles these days

    --
    Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  15. Re:How much? by evilviper · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why do people that read a legitimate news story always try to assume something is advertising.

    Perhaps because it's utterly and totally devoid of valuable information on the subject? When your copy is just "Ooh, look... Shiny!" and uncritically copying bits of info out of the manufacturer's press release... you are doing nothing more than advertising a product.

    If everyone blocked ads, many quality web sites would likely cease to exist, including Slashdot. Just because you can block, doesn't mean you should.

    Adblock Plus allows non-annoying advertisements through the filter, to be displayed by default...

    If every site used non-annoying ads, ad-blockers "would likely cease to exist."

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  16. Re:How much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why do people that read a legitimate news story always try to assume something is advertising. This was a press coordinated announcement by Dell-Alienware.

    I know you are right in the middle of it since that is your website and that makes it difficult to see things from any other perspective, but you should take a step back and try to see it as an uninvolved bystander would because those two statements are fundamentally contradictory. They can not both be simultaneously true, press-release journalism is not legitimate news, if for no other reason than coordination reduces your ability to critically report a story.

  17. Re:So why dont cases breathe out the top? by tompaulco · · Score: 2

    I have a cooler master haf-x. It breathes out the top. Works great, and I can put it right up against a wall, because the intlet fan is on the other side, unless I am an idiot and put the fan side against the wall. Even then there are two other fans, one in front and one in back to try to limit the damage if I am an idiot.
    I can't speak enough praise about this case. From the access points, to cable grommets, to incredible airflow, to built in sdata and usb frontside.
    I priced an alienware to a homebuilt with this case, and went homebuilt. I'll never look back. Alienware was probably 50-75% more and with them you don't get to pick the top of the line brand new components, if that is your choosing.
    This is not a slashvertisement, as I don't have any ad links for you to click, just my opinion and I hope you are able to use it to some benefit.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  18. Re:How much? by penguinoid · · Score: 2

    And ad blocking. Don't even get me started. So many ad blockers are so proud of what they do, like it's some badge of honor to block.

    Of course we're proud. What do you think we are, stupid? Who wants to sacrifice bandwidth so as to have a gaping security hole that occasionally installs malware directly via exploits, frequently contains deceptive warnings which actually link to malware, and at best are noisy or flashy distractions from the page itself? And then the pop-ups, pop-unders, redirects, phishing scams, etc. Things have gotten so nasty that Adblock Plus more effective for securing your computer than the so called "security software", and as a bonus it doesn't even eat all your processor and blocks ads besides.

    And the worst is that the advent of ad-supported web pages has slowly pushed people away from producing quality content as a contribution to the world, and towards producing SEO or clickbait content (or perhaps the latter hides the former).

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways