Slashdot Mirror


China Gives Microsoft 20 Days To Respond To Competition Probe

An anonymous reader writes "China has given Microsoft three weeks to explain "compatibility issues" in Windows and Office that could violate Chinese competition laws. The State Administration for Industry and Commerce (SAIC) questioned Microsoft Vice President David Chen and gave the company a deadline to make an explanation, the agency said in a short statement on its website. Microsoft's use of verification codes also spurred complaints from Chinese companies. Their use "may have violated China's anti-monopoly law", the official Xinhua news agency said on Monday."

79 comments

  1. Free market escapades! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    China is more concerned about free economics than the US? Weird.

    1. Re:Free market escapades! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, China is more concerned about free economics than US corporations.

    2. Re:Free market escapades! by Chrisq · · Score: 4, Insightful

      China is more concerned about free economics than the US? Weird.

      No - both are very interested when it is to their advantage to be so, less interested otherwise

    3. Re:Free market escapades! by ruir · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Or are they more concerned about updating thousands or billions of pirated Microsoft workstations? They could at least use it as an opportunity to promote their version of Linux.

    4. Re:Free market escapades! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Um no.
      China is more concerned about actually having to PAY for all their windows instances. This is just an opening blow in that negotiation.

    5. Re:Free market escapades! by flayzernax · · Score: 1

      TBH, in a world were IP and bullshit flies rampant around the globe. What you said is basically the same thing as being concerned about free economics. Liaise faire motherfuckers.

    6. Re:Free market escapades! by flayzernax · · Score: 2

      Lastly, I'm sure some libre office nerd in the Chinese Aristocracy probably got pissed when they tried to recently open an msword file and saw a lot of jibberish. It was bound to happen eventually.

    7. Re: Free market escapades! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chinux?

    8. Re:Free market escapades! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe that chinese politicians didn't get enough bribes from Microsoft.
      They'll milk Microsoft as much as possible.

    9. Re:Free market escapades! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      China doesn't give a rat's ass about free economics. A good example is that any venture on their soil has to be 51% owned by a Chinese interest. Try that shit in the US, and companies will laugh themselves silly, and set up shop elsewhere.

      The issue is more of nationalism. Putting a foreign company up front of a Kafka-like kangaroo court is great for the domestic country's pride, as they have an enemy that stones can be hurled at. This is all the anti-Microsoft "investigations" are.

      At least the EU made it damn clear what they were investigating and what they were charging companies for, even though they do have a tendency to haul MS and Google on the carpet when they need a PR boost (when in doubt, some anti-Yank sentiment keeps the political office secure.) China's anti-monopoly stuff is just plain vague, and appears to be more of an extortion move than actual order of law.

    10. Re:Free market escapades! by Livius · · Score: 1

      Yet unsurprising.

    11. Re:Free market escapades! by ilguido · · Score: 1

      From the TFA: "Microsoft's new obstacles in China come as the government reportedly begins ramping up efforts to build the nation's own operating system.".

    12. Re:Free market escapades! by murdocj · · Score: 1

      If you think this is about free economics, China has a bridge it wants to sell you.

    13. Re:Free market escapades! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ^ This. China sees the US leading the tech industry and wants to ensure that their companies come first. If anything Google is the monopoly to worry about, but China will get to them, too. Just wait.

    14. Re:Free market escapades! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes... Soon everyone will be speaking Mandarin.

    15. Re:Free market escapades! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, hassling/shaking down foreign companies over imagined wrongdoing, for political purposes. Truly 'free economics'.

    16. Re:Free market escapades! by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Imagined? I doubt that. From what I read in the summary it sounded like they were pissed off when their old programs couldn't read the new file format. To me that sounds fair. I don't think very highly of breaking backwards compatibility. It's occasionally necessary, but extremely more rarely than it is done. Usually it seems a strategy to force a purchase of new versions. And to me that sounds like abuse of a dominant market position. (I'd say abuse of monopoly, but somebody always thinks that means there aren't any competitors.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    17. Re:Free market escapades! by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      Wait, did you just tie non-backwards compatibility to monopoly dominance?
      Seems to me if someone wanted to maintain a monopoly, they'd stay forever backwards compatible, to keep people from ever changing.

    18. Re:Free market escapades! by HiThere · · Score: 2

      You're leaving out profit. Once you feel secure in your monopoly, then incompatible upgrades are a benefit, because they force users to upgrade.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    19. Re:Free market escapades! by eanbowman · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laissez-faire

      It literally means let them do.

      The more you know

  2. And well they should. by Shaman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No government should be forcing its citizens into proprietary software which writes its data in proprietary ways without good, permanent ways to retrieve that data in the far future. Formats like OpenDoc are fully documented and open to public scrutiny. Not to mention the costs and risks of dealing with licensing; working with software that has no source code available.

    --
    ...Steve
    1. Re:And well they should. by DogDude · · Score: 1

      No government should be forcing its citizens into proprietary software which writes its data in proprietary ways without good, permanent ways to retrieve that data in the far future.

      You're right. Glad no government is doing that!

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    2. Re:And well they should. by Dishevel · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I use Open Office daily at work. We have many PCs running open office here. I allow MS Office on one computer at the office for fuckwads that can not figure out how to not send us DOCX. Works great.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    3. Re:And well they should. by nashv · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You seem to believe that the reason people use Microsoft Office is because they are unaware of the more sensible choice. People use Microsoft Office because people resist change, and collections of people in bureaucracies resist change even more.

      Proprietary nature of information storage is considered a plus in bureaucratic circles - because many institutions have more money in their budgets than IQ or technical expertise in their staff. Proprietary means that when it breaks , somebody can be held responsible. It means that when someone doesn't understand something, they can fall back on their pre-existing knowledge of how to use a telephone and call support - thereby also absolving themselves on paper. The reason for work not done can be provided to superiors as "There is a problem with the software. Technical support is looking into it." The alternative would be to actually delve into the thing and try to fix it yourself - but that would involve learning something - which is not their job.

      Neither does it help that when it comes to open formats, the best answer you can expect is "You found a bug? Submit a patch".

      Open source software typically lacks a central authority that bureaucrats can complain to , sue if necessary, when things go wrong. The risk of licensing that you talk of is not even a factor - because the incentive to minimize one's own effort is higher than actually getting the task at hand done.

      This is always going to be a major problem unless mitigated by a Red-Hat like model of doing business. Still, the geek community fails hard at understanding why the typical institutions still use licensed and proprietary software. They are trying to approach the problem from the logical point of view, while what is at play here is human psychology, behaviour, and administrative politics.

      --
      Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem.
    4. Re:And well they should. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More likely they need to bribe someone.

      Oh, well, the sacrifices they make for that "great" market ...

    5. Re:And well they should. by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      No government should be forcing its citizens into proprietary software which writes its data in proprietary ways without good, permanent ways to retrieve that data in the far future. Formats like OpenDoc are fully documented and open to public scrutiny. Not to mention the costs and risks of dealing with licensing; working with software that has no source code available.

      If China wasn't conducting this probe, how would China be 'forcing' its citizens to use proprietary software? How is this probe removing the forcing of the use of proprietary software?

    6. Re:And well they should. by king+neckbeard · · Score: 2

      If the government using MSOffice and you have to send and receive documents from the government, the government effectively forces you to use proprietary software.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    7. Re:And well they should. by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      And the way to fix that is to launch a formal investigation into the supplier of the software? Bollocks.

    8. Re:And well they should. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give me a break. There is nothing stopping a company from fixing bugs itself or outsourcing to a company to do so. There is a reason Redhat makes money and you've already pointed that out. This idea that the license somehow negatively impacts business is propaganda at its best.

    9. Re:And well they should. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use LibreOffice, it copes way better with DOCX. And can write it too, unlike Open Office.

    10. Re:And well they should. by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      I actually like Open Office better. The DOCX stuff should seriously just die. Most versions of MS Office can not even deal with it.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    11. Re:And well they should. by Shaman · · Score: 1

      > You're right. Glad no government is doing that!

      *sigh*

      --
      ...Steve
    12. Re:And well they should. by bondsbw · · Score: 1

      There is nothing stopping a company from fixing bugs itself

      If the company doesn't hire programmers, or if their programmers are not competent at the particular language/APIs/tools at hand, then this path would require hiring new developers and potentially purchasing development software. So in this case, cost may be stopping the company.

      or outsourcing to a company to do so.

      Assuming this even exists. Only a few of the open source projects I've used have any type of paid support, which brings the company back to paying for their own developers.

      Granted, the company probably saved a lot of money by using open source in the first place. But in the end, many companies will choose to foot a larger bill if they can budget for it in advance. "We will need $100,000 for Office licenses" often sounds better than "We didn't budget for it, but it turns out we need $30,000 for various unforeseen development expenses."

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    13. Re:And well they should. by bondsbw · · Score: 1

      (I wish there were an edit button.)

      I just wanted to explain the reason budgeting in advance is preferred, at risk of stating the obvious. Companies tend to have a lot of moving parts, and if part P needs to be ready by date D, it may be due to dependencies. Those dependencies are in many forms including additional development that needs part P, time for QA, deadlines promised to the customer, and so on.

      So if suddenly part P is going to take 5 days more to fix a bug that was unforeseen in a third party component, that could have a major effect on getting everything to market. What if QA has a tight schedule and, 5 days later, already has something else scheduled for testing? It might be a month or two before they get around to getting your component tested. Same applies to other forms of dependency.

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    14. Re:And well they should. by pete6677 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      LOL, good luck suing Microsoft when Office fucks up and causes you some sort of damages. They are liable for nothing, and might eventually patch the bug if they deem it worth fixing.

    15. Re:And well they should. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to believe that the reason people use Microsoft Office is because they are unaware of the more sensible choice. People use Microsoft Office because people resist change, and collections of people in bureaucracies resist change even more.

      Um, I think Microsoft Office is actually pretty good. I got used to the Ribbon interface and like it more than the older one from 2003. It's pretty great... *ducks*

    16. Re:And well they should. by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

      Nothing is stopping FOSS from buying a license to said code why should they be allowed to get things for free? Oh wait this is communist china where 95% of the window computers are pirated. China is not an open free market.

      --
      Jack of all trades,master of none
    17. Re:And well they should. by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      so let them use linux and open office, whats the problem here

      oh they want their cake and eat it too, for free apparently as well

    18. Re:And well they should. by Osgeld · · Score: 2

      office exports plain text, rich text and html ya know

    19. Re:And well they should. by InfiniteZero · · Score: 2

      Liability not in the sense of suing someone, but in the sense that you won't be liable and your ass is safe.

      Say you are the CIO of a company. If you pick MS and something goes wrong, you can shift the blame onto MS. If you pick OSS and something goes wrong, well, the blame will be on you.

      Hence the old adage: nobody ever got fired for buying IBM.

    20. Re:And well they should. by Lennie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Do not confuse open formats and open source software. These are 2 different things.

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
    21. Re:And well they should. by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      usually though its "we need $100,000 for office licences, plus $30000 for unforseen developmental and admin expenses".

      However, you're right in that its easier to ask for a budget, and the bigger the budget the more important a manager you are, so therefore, you buy the most easily explained tool that costs the most. And then you pad it out with that office 365 rollout, and the sharepoint site that never gets used.

    22. Re:And well they should. by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      meh., they want their cake.... and they want Microsoft to pay for it, a huge cake, larger than you could ever eat in a lifetime, with cherries on top.

      Worked for the EU after all !

    23. Re:And well they should. by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      If the government using MSOffice and you have to send and receive documents from the government, the government effectively forces you to use proprietary software.

      Does the Chinese government force people to send documents in a proprietary format for which is there is no free software that can create that format?

    24. Re:And well they should. by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      I don't know. I do know that governments have, in the past, only accepted MS formats, and that even MS doesn't have perfect compatibility, which means that if you don't want to deal with the complications of compatibility, you are forced to have at least one machine in the office with MS Office.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    25. Re:And well they should. by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      But in the end, many companies will choose to foot a larger bill if they can budget for it in advance. "We will need $100,000 for Office licenses" often sounds better than "We didn't budget for it, but it turns out we need $30,000 for various unforeseen development expenses."

      It also rarely matters what the total cost turns out to be, but rather the per-seat cost.

      If you can get a big enough volume discount, $200 or so per seat doesn't look bad considering that it's a purchase (Office doesn't require yearly fees), and you get a lot more support overall (both official through MS and various help web sites).

    26. Re: And well they should. by bondsbw · · Score: 0

      Office 365 is a subscription plan with yearly costs. But I feel it is a better plan since any future release is included, and generally costs less in the long run vs. purchasing each version as it cones out.

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    27. Re:And well they should. by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

      It's true, but in the office suite space, the only programs that properly support open formats are currently OSS.

      The standard version of MOO-XML isn't implemented by MS Office (it still only supports the "transitional" version).

      MS Office does it's best to break ODF documents when possible as far as I can tell. It destroyed all the formulas in ODS sheets last time I tried editing one in Excel.

    28. Re:And well they should. by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      But if that's the case, then the government should simply say "Do not us the proprietary MS format going forward, use format X". I don't see how Microsoft factors into this, other than grandstanding.

    29. Re:And well they should. by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      I don't know. I do know that governments have, in the past, only accepted MS formats, and that even MS doesn't have perfect compatibility, which means that if you don't want to deal with the complications of compatibility, you are forced to have at least one machine in the office with MS Office.

      If that's really the concern here, should China be conducting a probe against itself, not Microsoft?

    30. Re:And well they should. by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      This only works in large CYA-driven companies where upper management is clueless to anything technological. In startups, there is no time for the blame game. Hence, startups tend to eschew Microsoft/IBM.

  3. Chinese angry about verification codes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Apparently just having the .iso file should be good enough. If Microsoft products can't be easily pirated, then China is pissed.

    1. Re:Chinese angry about verification codes by pepty · · Score: 1

      True, but the anti-monopoly justification is being used against foreign corporations in lots of different industries: mobile phones,car parts, eyewear, shipping... they're also using other methods to go against foreign drug companies. Getting "Windows on the cheap - Or Else" is just one part of China flexing its muscles in new ways.

    2. Re:Chinese angry about verification codes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatever. It's a kleptocracy. Corruption rules in China and I have no sympathy for western corps that wade into China with dollar-sign eyeballs and get raped.

    3. Re:Chinese angry about verification codes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They purchased at least one copy of XP and office.
      They it so much it multiplied across thousands of computers.
      Win7 somewhat the same story.
      Now the issue is between the activation and Win shit 8.
      If China stops bitching and stays away from Win8 they would be smart, Win8 sucks!

  4. china might not roll over as easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China is not likely to roll over as easy as the US did after Microsoft cranked up the brib^h^h^h^hcampaign donations in the way of the US antitrust case.

  5. What is there surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows and Office are full of Microsoft's proprietary technologies, the same way OS X is of Apple's. That shouldn't be news to anyone. I wonder what China is trying to accomplish with this. Just install Linux then and you can have all your open standards. What, you say that the QA of Linux desktop is terrible and not suitable for enterprise deployments? Yeah, that might be a problem...

  6. Did I mention fuck Beta? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the hell is this crap still doing alive??

    DICE don't get it. They never will.

  7. China?? Competition?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lol, that's a good one. Whenever an American company competes with a Chinese one, they typically ban it to ensure the Chinese one wins (think Facebook, Google, Twitter...)

  8. Harry Reid says: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "One problem that Microsoft is having is keeping their Wongs straight."

  9. What laws? by jader3rd · · Score: 1

    So which laws are being violated? Did China give Microsoft a specific list of complaints, and if so what are those complaints?

    1. Re:What laws? by andrewbaldwin · · Score: 2

      I suspect it's on the other side of the paper containing the list of patents Microsoft is claiming Android violates.

  10. "Chinese competition laws" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you kidding me??

  11. Known Chinese trick. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They try to force Microsoft to give them source code, so they can pirate it and create "competitive" product.

  12. It might not be just about competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm no fan of the Redmond beast, but this might not be just about competition. China has been moving from bluish-reddish China to Seriously Red China lately. Its true though that Microsoft's products *are* incompatible, and not just with Linux and every other system out there, but with previous and future products of their own. They go out of their way to make products that don't work with anything else even their own former products are incompatible. Fortunately, unlike in the US under the Bush Administration, China will take strong action, and there is nothing the Beast from Redmond(tm) can do about it.

  13. retire IE by Karmashock · · Score: 2

    Its a magnet for stupid lawsuits and everyone hates it anyway.

    And seriously why does MS care what browser you use... they make nothing on it either way.

    of course, every OS comes with a preinstalled browser... Possibly MS should just install the chinese browser instead in china. I'm sure the chinese have something appropriately stupid to foist on people. Throw that at them and then everyone can be annoyed by the chinese government for the first five minutes of using a new machine before they uninstall it and install something they'd rather have instead.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:retire IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are very.. very.. shortsighted about this. If you think this is about MS at all, you're missing the big picture. This is about China not wanting the US to dominate tech anymore. China wants Baidu, their own Linux OS, and anything else to be based from China. They want you learning mandarin as it will reduce their localization costs.

    2. Re:retire IE by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Yes and everyone always attacks MS over the stupid browser. how about if you shipped windows in china with a version of IE that was really limited. Basically a crap version of IE that was just good enough to go download something better but quite obviously not a viable mainline browser. And by all means, let them install IE if they CHOOSE to do so but make sure that they have to choose to make that happen.

      Look, I know exactly what china is doing. Same thing Russia did when they shut McDonald's down for health violations. Its a pretext to do protectionism. Which is fine. All nations piss in each other's coffee like this... but MS should probably do something to make it harder to cite them for violations. The browser issue is absurd at this point. But the chinese are going to use anything they think is even halfway credible.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  14. About time.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft has been flagrantly violating competition law in more corrupt countries for years by locking people into their software through undocumented & incompatible protocols and file formats. Hopefully the Chinese government will at last fix this problem.

  15. Slowly withdraw all manufacturing from China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We need to stop helping China; let them figure out how to develop themselves with Russia as a main partner. China sits on the sidelines and arms terrorists and causes conflict and watches us spend out blood and treasure.

    1. Re:Slowly withdraw all manufacturing from China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China sits on the sidelines and arms terrorists and causes conflict and watches us spend out blood and treasure.

      america does it more.

      china will force microsoft to opensource nt5.x

      stupid

  16. Clean your own house first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe China should take their Anti-Monopoly (Monopoly defined as the exclusive possession or control of something.) law and use it against the single political party system they have before worrying about anything else.

  17. hum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can use powershell or vb script to download web browsers but it's unlikely average joe will know how to do this if there is no IE available for Windows. MS has too many damn employees especially all of the world, 100k+. MS needs to cut down to at least 40k employees(all redmond) and just close all offices overseas. I read somewhere the majority of employees are not coders. Just freaking simplify things just get rid of the European and Chinese headaches. They will save more money and probably be able to reduce freaking product costs.

    If the rest of the world is not happy with the way MS OS products are bundled with their IE than they should move to Linux and that's the end of that. MS should not fear Linux anyway. The De's are buggy, too internet dependent when it comes down to software installations(dependencies issues), no regression testing which leads to newer bugs, still needs the cli when you need to install newer software for a frozen in time distro or really just to fix issues, there aren't any open source software that can really compete against Windows based software. No gimp is not photoshop and blender is not maya.

    MS needs to simplify their operations to relieve all the headaches and become more efficient.

  18. Ah, up to playing games again, China.. by Rick+in+China · · Score: 2

    China already beat Google's ass, I suppose it's MS's turn. MS was pretty much OK with the fact China has free-for-all piracy with their OS/office products with the expectations that they would be charging companies for licenses and the more people are familiar with/use their OS the more it'll be the OS of choice in the future, any computer plaza has any version available for 5 yuan (less than a buck), fully cracked..but now that China is putting some effort into getting involved in the desktop OS game - target MS! Fun.

    I know first hand that the SAIC *can be controlled* like an attack dog, it's a very corrupt agency. I'm not saying that MS isn't in breach of any regulations or anti-monopolistic practices in this case...what I'm saying is China doesn't typically give a shit about anything media/software companies are doing until they have an interest or feel a threat, then they decide to bring the hammer down hard and there is very little you can do about it because the general public doesn't care enough to start a ruckus - pirated copies of whatever you're selling will always be available anyways. If anyone could have evaded, Google would have - but simply got exhausted and pulled out with significant internal pains (and continuing pains.)

  19. Microsoft should respond, by CHIT2ME · · Score: 0

    Microsoft should respond to the Chinese; Where is the payment of all those thousands or billions of pirated MS operating systems being used in China? You have 20 days to pay up or we shut down all Microsoft software in China!

    --
    My karma is bad. Don't get too close!!!
  20. The CCP is very desperate these days. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a Chinese working as a China analyst at a think tank. It is becoming more and more apparent to many people, that the ruling Chinese Communist Party (CCP) knows it is on its last straw of survival.

    The party is facing severe and endlessly increasing systematic stress on all fronts:

    1. Increasing external oppositions from all other countries in the world including all of China's neighbours. They are forming more and more alliances and becoming more outspoken with rising strengths against China, in addition to increasing anti-China sentiment from people in all other countries. Many countries including Canada and Australia and U.S. have just tightened their immigration policy to prevent Chinese from entering their countries. Even on these casual internet message boards, when you look past the paid Chinese propaganda professional commenters, you notice rising general anti-China feelings from all over the world.

    2. Increasing internal severe and massive violent social unrest and anti-CCP mutiny from people of all Chinese living places. To beat down internal dissent in mainland China, the CCP every year is forced to spend even more money than on its massive military budget. All the semi-external places (Hong Kong, Xinjiang, Tibet, Macau) are fighting harder and harder to break free from China. Taiwan is for all practical purposes already a separate democratic country, with its own army specificly trained to fight the PLA, and anti-China sentiment there (especially among younger Taiwanese generation) is at all-time high after seeing how China violently suppress Hong Kong as an example of "reunification". This whole situation is continuously worsened by the free flow of information, with Chinese people knowing more and more from travelling abroad and learning about truths from jumping beyond the "Great Fire Wall" on the internet.

    3. Its own economy and social system never able to advance to higher level beyond mass skill-less manufacturing, due to complete absence of law and common morals. High technology and innovations and scientific development all require many citizens working together voluntarily contributing long term in a system they trust, with things like rule of law, no censorship on knowledge, no restrictions on speech and expression, copyrights, open minds, patents, common morals when collaborating and trading with each other etc. These qualities are all destroyed in modern China by the CCP. When was the last time you heard an announcement of technology development or innovations or scientific breakthrough coming from a Chinese organization / company / university? You haven't because there ain't any. Unlike mass manufacturing factory work, high level human developments cannot be forced by or bought with a dictator's central planning. The only way contemporary China gets these things is from stealing and spying from all other countries e.g. using Chinese scientists working overseas to steal secrets, installing spywares in foreign executives' electronic devices when they enter China etc, but these efforts have become more difficult since the whole world has caught on to their act.

    This systematic fatal flaw is why you do not see even one Chinese brand or company that can compete in the international market in any industry of the human race. For example Lenovo, who is already one of the few Chinese brands some people may have heard of, cannot make either the chips that power their computers or the operating system that run them, so it is just one of many plain vanilla boxmakers without any competitive advantage offering only cheap price. Another example Huawei is blacklisted by many countries and international customers because everyone knows Huawei's products send all communication data back to the CCP. This CCP weakness is also why China cannot produce even one home-grown science Nobel Prize winner in its history, nor one famous business guru, nor one inspiring leader, nor one cultural icon, not even a third rate national soccer team ( Chinese work hard individually but do not work

  21. What? China accepted the terms! by nesdave1 · · Score: 1

    When Gates set up the deal to outfit China with MS OS, they didn't mind the product controls.Now they want to change the game plan? Someone better explain the contract to them.