Slashdot Mirror


Surprise! More Than Twice As Much Mercury In Environment As Thought

sciencehabit writes The most comprehensive estimate of mercury released into the environment is putting a new spotlight on the potent neurotoxin. By accounting for mercury in consumer products, such as thermostats, and released by industrial processes, the calculations more than double previous tallies of the amount of mercury that has entered the environment since 1850. The analysis also reveals a previously unknown spike in mercury emissions during the 1970s, caused largely by the use of mercury in latex paint.

116 of 173 comments (clear)

  1. Enlighten me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Where did this mercury come from originally? Aren't we really just sending it home?

    1. Re:Enlighten me by MrL0G1C · · Score: 3, Informative

      Correct, mercury is mined from fish. (sarcasm)

      Mercury is 'mined'. It was locked up nicely in rocks that were below ground. Once released it is then in the air, water soil etc - not where you want it.

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    2. Re:Enlighten me by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 2

      Aren't we really just sending it home?

      Actually we sent it to a farm where it can run free and be happy...

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    3. Re:Enlighten me by Skidborg · · Score: 1

      So how does it get locked up in the rocks in the first place?

      --
      Supporter of the +1 Over Dramatic mod option. In memory of apk.
    4. Re:Enlighten me by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      Just remember, mercury has a half-life of about 10^28 million years or longer, so don't expect it to just go away.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    5. Re:Enlighten me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So how does it get locked up in the rocks in the first place?

      By poisoning plants and animals, getting concentrated and then their mercury-loaded bodies get buried in sediments. Sorry, I'd rather consume fish from Fukushima than rather than mercury-laced ones (if there actually was a choice!).

      And no, mercury is not released from coal alone. It's in oil. It's in natural gas.

      So, please, eat more tuna. Eat it for morning, lunch and diner. And when you die from exposure to mercury, please make sure to get buried in a hazardous dump. That way you are doing a positive, and helping clean up mercury your generation is releasing into the sky. Thanks!

      PS. Human bodies can deal with low level mercury, but not with amounts currently in existence in most surface waters (and fish). Yes, almost all lakes in US are now contaminated with mercury. The same for Europe.

    6. Re:Enlighten me by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      It's an approximation. Maybe the order of magnitude will be off by 50%. Sure, mercury has more protons but on average the protons in it have less potential energy than free protons (ie, you can get energy by fusing protons into mercury), so I expect that to make up for some of that. Mainly, it's a jab at people who get terrified for no reason about anything to do with radioactivity or half-life.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    7. Re:Enlighten me by MrL0G1C · · Score: 2

      I'm not a geologist, an educated guess would be that the answer is part cosmology - the mercury was present in the materials that formed the Earth in the first place and part geology, the mercury got to where it was after billions of years of earth changes through tectonic plates shifting, volcanoes, erosion, compression etc.

      Wikipedia says
      "It is found either as a native metal (rare) or in cinnabar, corderoite, livingstonite and other minerals, with cinnabar (HgS) being the most common ore.[23] Mercury ores usually occur in very young orogenic belts where rocks of high density are forced to the crust of the Earth, often in hot springs or other volcanic regions.[24]"

      3 Occurrence

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    8. Re:Enlighten me by OneAhead · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, the biosphere can separate elements far, far faster. Unfortunately, it's still far, far slower that the average historic lifetime of human civilizations.

  2. Re:Broken light bulbs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Compared the coal-fired electric plant, that's nothing.

  3. Re:Broken light bulbs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The whole issue makes me mad as a hatter.

  4. Are we british now? by Orgasmatron · · Score: 1, Troll

    Where is "Environment"? I've never heard of a place by that name. Or was the headline about ambient mercury in "the environment"?

    The good news is that finding out that there is twice as much of it around means that it is half as harmful as we were thinking it was, assuming the retarded LNT model preferred by statists everywhere.

    --
    See that "Preview" button?
    1. Re:Are we british now? by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Where is "Environment"? I've never heard of a place by that name. Or was the headline about ambient mercury in "the environment"?

      Headlines miss out words all the time. Film at 11...

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    2. Re:Are we british now? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      What has being British got to do with anything?

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    3. Re:Are we british now? by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      It's classical newspaper style to omit articles and capitalize words in headlines. Not exactly missing out [by accident].

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    4. Re:Are we british now? by julesh · · Score: 1

      What has being British got to do with anything?

      I suspect OP was being ironic. British English tends to include words in sentences that US English usually omits.

  5. mercury in CFLs is a net good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A bit of calculation will show that CFLs are likely to save more mercury by decreasing the amount of coal burned, even if you smashed each one on the ground at the end of life. A huge fraction of anthropogenic environmental mercury comes from burning coal. Overall, they are almost certainly a net reduction in anthropogenic mercury. I don't think they're great, but they are a reasonable stop-gap solution until LEDs take over.

    1. Re:mercury in CFLs is a net good by Smallpond · · Score: 2

      Best not to assume that LEDs are better:

      http://www.gizmag.com/led-bulb...

    2. Re:mercury in CFLs is a net good by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      This is exactly the same profile as any other e-waste. I'm fine with treating LED bulbs as such.

    3. Re:mercury in CFLs is a net good by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      When you accidentally a LED, does it immediately release toxic fumes in the air for everyone to inhale? Also, see the sibling post about e-waste.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    4. Re: mercury in CFLs is a net good by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      You obviously know nothing about electronics and magic smoke

      Good point -- it's been a while since I've had a puff of that, if you know what I mean...

      Seriously, though, I'm picturing a scenario where you accidentally drop a CFL or LED. Besides the mercury vapour issue, it's also nice that one of these stays fully functional after a drop.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    5. Re: mercury in CFLs is a net good by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You obviously know nothing about electronics and magic smoke

      You obviously know nothing about LED power supplies vs. electronic ballasts for CFLs.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:mercury in CFLs is a net good by rhazz · · Score: 1

      Only if you accidentally the whole thing!

  6. Re: Broken light bulbs. by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    Blame China. They don't have scrubbers at most of their plants.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  7. Impressive, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I would be more surprised if we found significant amounts of Neptune, Uranus or Pluto...

    1. Re:Impressive, but by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Well, you certainly found Uranus.

  8. Re: Broken light bulbs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Blame $EASY_TARGET for hundreds of years of humans everywhere not giving a fuck.

  9. Re:Broken light bulbs. by MrL0G1C · · Score: 2

    Not much:
    http://earthtechling.com/2011/...

    5 thousandths of a gram is a lot of mercury for 1 cf bulb. 720,000 tons of mercury amounts to about 100grams per human, so cf bulbs are likely responsible for less than 100th of 1% of the total mercury pollution.

    --
    Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
  10. Re:And don't forget mercury in the CFLs... by MrL0G1C · · Score: 5, Informative

    Except CFLs are regulated to have less than 2.5mg of mercury in and some will no doubt have a lot less.

    CFLs prevent more mercury from being released into the environment via coal than they release:
    How much Mercury is in Compact Fluorescent ( CFL ) bulbs , watch ...

    Of course LEDs are better, do you have an argument against those?

    --
    Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
  11. Re: Broken light bulbs. by MrL0G1C · · Score: 2

    Whilst I'm not condoning China's pollution record, most of their industrialisation capacity-wise has been this last decade. The article shows that mercury has been entering the environment for over a century with the amounts being released in the year 1900 being similar to that released in the year 2000.

    --
    Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
  12. Re: Broken light bulbs. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    and yet "we need to" fine the solar plants that are frying a few birds while all the mercury from coal plants probably kills three orders of magnitude more.

    I know, let's protest the solar plant and then head out to KFC for an afterparty. We'll toast to the bureaucrats.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  13. Re: Misleading Headline by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 4, Funny

    one can produce elmental mercury from ore with alchemy. At least that's what I'd assume you'd call it.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  14. Re: Broken light bulbs. by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    So I'll get to the nut of of it all. The EPA has been hell-bent on shutting down US industry and other green initiatives to tax us to the poor house. So the natural alternative is to offshore that production to the cheapest part of the world possible that can do the job; that's China. So here's an idea: If the EPA is serious about cleaning up our pollution, how about a portion of that "sin tax" goes toward purchasing scrubbing technology for China (verified and installed, not some Chinese slush fund that would get exploited by the corrupted) rather then telling us what light bulbs and TVs we can and can't buy.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  15. Re: Broken light bulbs. by haruchai · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Have a look at the history of when American coal plants started installing scrubbers and figure out when they reached 10%, 20%, 30% of plants etc, old & new, that were properly outfitted.
    You'll find there's more than enough blame to go around.

    --
    Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  16. Re:So you're cheating by Smallpond · · Score: 2

    I blame all that mercurochrome my mom put on my cuts when I was little.

  17. Re:And don't forget mercury in the CFLs... by sphealey · · Score: 4, Informative

    Also, the 48" straight florescent bulbs that everyone use to have in their garage and above their workbench contained 85 mg of mercury (per bulb) up through 1990; are now limited (!) to 25 mg. Haven't heard any complaints about those from the rolling coal set.

    sPh

  18. china's coal power plants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Coal is messy stuff, with all sorts of wierd elements in it. hundreds of millions of tons of coal is burned each year. Most of those elements are not toxic in very low doses in the environment, so we don't care about them. Directly burning coal can be quite messy, and make air difficult to breathe, like secondhand smoke. Thanks to modern pulverized coal boilers, and scubbers, a lot of the worst of coal has been tamed. America made of bunch of changes in the 70s. China has been moving to modern coal power plants with scrubbers.

  19. Re:And don't forget mercury in the CFLs... by pepty · · Score: 1

    There is nothing anti-science about having slaves and

    Of course that is anti-science. Any economist would tell you that it is much cheaper to just get rid of minimum wage and overtime laws and then put your workers in a company town than it is to import, purchase and maintain slaves.

  20. Re:Mercury is in your flu shot by Bengie · · Score: 1

    Different kind of Mercury. The kind is most industrial is the kind that your body can't get rid of, so it just builds up. The kind in shots/jabs is a kind your body can expel quite quickly.

  21. Re: Broken light bulbs. by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

    I'd certainly support anti-pollution tariffs. Regarding that, the WTO, TTIP, NAFTA etc trade treaties are all rabidly against tariffs, no matter what they try to protect (anti-dumping tariffs are allowed).

    --
    Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
  22. Re:Broken light bulbs. by Rhywden · · Score: 4, Funny

    From the (maximum of) 5 milligrams of mercury? What did you do? Break the lamp very carefully and then snort the contents?

  23. Re: Broken light bulbs. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Blame $EASY_TARGET for hundreds of years of humans everywhere not giving a fuck.

    The neurological effects of mercury were not understood hundreds of years ago, nor did people understand that burning coal emitted it. So their behavior was out of ignorance. We know far more today, so China's emissions are not as excusable. You can buy thermometers with a bulb of mercury at any Chinese drugstore. The long term economic costs of neurological damage will far outweigh the few fen they are saving today.

  24. Were the latex paint people jealous by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 2

    Were the latex paint people jealous of the oil based lead paint people and all the attention they were getting? Lead and mercury have been known to be hazardous for decades prior to the 70s. Why in a million years would they think that it was a good idea. Minimally with the late 60s and 70s being a huge eco movement time any company would think twice before potentially attracting the attention of a combination of the health authorities, the eco crowd, and shows like 60 minutes.

    I wonder if the huge crime spikes of the 60's and 70's had this mercury as another contributing factor?

    1. Re:Were the latex paint people jealous by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Led was used for two things in paint. Pigment and mold control.

      Banning it as a pigment was a no brainer, white led paint is about 8% led. But banning its use for mold control led directly to the use of mercury as a substitute and it was never more than a tiny fraction.

      Washington got it wrong, yet again.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:Were the latex paint people jealous by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

      I second this, Lead and mercury really screw up people (especially children) at pretty much any level; and it isn't just the home owner who gets to make the decision but he would then be deciding for future owners and unknowing tradesmen who are either applying the product or later sanding and drilling where it was applied. The rule is the less the better as opposed to some level being fine. For instance with arsenic they are finding that a tiny tiny amount is probably good for you. But I have never heard of this with Lead or Mercury.

    3. Re:Were the latex paint people jealous by Artifakt · · Score: 2

      Tetraethyl Lead was used in automotive fuel from the 1920s through much of the 70s, and is still used in some aviation fuel. There appears to be illegal manufacture and use of the substance ongoing in the PRC. The amounts involved as a fuel antiknock ingredient exceed Lead's use in mold control and paint, and should be considered the primary source for increased Lead in the environment..

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    4. Re:Were the latex paint people jealous by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Tetraethyl Lead was used [..], and is still used in some aviation fuel. There appears to be illegal manufacture and use of the substance ongoing in the PRC.

      If there is still legal manufacture and use in aviation gas, as you imply, what makes you think that there is illegal manufacture in PRC? There may be illegal or unlicensed use of PbEt4, made for the aviation market, as automobile fuel additives, but that doesn't make the manufacture itself illegal. Always assuming, of course that you're applying the appropriate laws to PRC. Whatever jurisdiction you're resident in, it's laws don't apply in the PRC (unless you're in the PRC). I don't know if the PRC has banned the manufacture of PbEt4. I do know that a very high proportion of the automobiles in China were manufactured since the 1980s, which means that they've got no need to use PbEt4. And that in itself casts serious doubt on your assertion.

      The amounts involved as a fuel antiknock ingredient exceed Lead's use in mold control and paint, and should be considered the primary source for increased Lead in the environment.

      That was certainly the case when I was learning to drive. But I can't remember having seen any petrol pumps supplying PbEt4-doped fuel for ... over a decade, maybe approaching two decades now. I remember there being a mild wailing and gnashing of teeth from the old-car freaks when the last refinery in the country (on this continent, perhaps?) that produced PbEt4-doped fuel stopped producing it. But they've shut the fuck up because anti-knock additives are available for engines that can't be dressed-back to use lead-free fuel ; you just have to pour in an appropriate amount of additive into your tank along with the amount of fuel. Yourself. Also, the additives may be less toxic - lead is not the only metal ion that exhibits anti-knock properties, just the cheapest, when you're doing it by the hundred-tonne batch.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  25. Re:Broken light bulbs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Heavy metal poisoning does not work that way. You might want to pop to your doctors and get a CT scan, because that sounds more like a brain tumour than any short term effects from mercury.

  26. Back when Moby Dick was a minnow ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 5, Informative

    ... ca. 1953, my daddy worked in a oil refinery and he'd bring home small sample bottles full of mercury.

    We puzzled at it, amazed at how heavy the bottle was and stuff. We poured some in our hands and rolled it around.

    Then we coated dimes and pennies with it to make them look like silver and played with those.

    Fast-forward 25 years and I'm an instrument man in an oil refinery lab and I'm calibrating a pneumatic gauge with a manometer that uses lots of mercury and I get a case of the dumbass and blow mercury all the way to the ceiling, all over counter tops and on the flour.

    They evacuated the entire lab and sent in the hazmat team and stuff.

    It's funny how things change with education and I never experienced any fallout from the big white letter E on my keyboard with the bluetooth that clasps to the ballpoint pen of my mother's daisy.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    1. Re:Back when Moby Dick was a minnow ... by penguinoid · · Score: 2

      Liquid elemental mercury is actually hard to absorb by the body. It's chemically modified mercury, or mercury vapor, that are dangerous. Dimethyl mercury, for example, is fantastically dangerous stuff, and rapidly passes through latex, PVC, butyl, neoprene, and skin, and a drop of it can kill you. Meanwhile the mercury amalgam in my tooth fillings apparently is absorbed via vaporization and the lungs, and contributes about as much as occasionally eating fish, even though I have a few thousand mg of it in my teeth for decades.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    2. Re:Back when Moby Dick was a minnow ... by bussdriver · · Score: 1

      My science teacher had similar comments; however, he was really careful with the stuff. It can cause a lot of problems, it's deceptively dangerous it is not like a poison. Different people have different thresholds, plus you also have younger generations growing up with higher exposure rates for their whole lifespan which makes them less tolerant. Handling it with your hands is one thing, eating it is another. In a powder or gas it's bad stuff --- which is why procedures are over protective, if you spill a liquid they act as if you atomized it into the air because legal policies are designed to fight future lawsuits-- they go to stupid extremes to make extra sure that employee who sucked on thermometers doesn't blame them for his problems simply because they had him near the stuff on the job. We need those laws that allow people to sue evil employers, but the result is over protection and greedy people who abuse the system (who are not much different than the greedy employers who started the mess.)

      Also keep in mind, you didn't play with mercury as your job-- it was just an amusing thing you did for a short period until it was no longer amusing.

      Personally, I've noticed the warnings about eating fish caught locally get worse every few years from when I was a kid fishing with my father. A smaller lake can be ruled off limits if contaminated and it takes an amazingly small amount to ruin a lake... you'd think some ex-spouse would think of devaluing a house/cabin by destroying a lake... Thank goodness it hasn't... there's another thing for insurance to jack you on...

    3. Re:Back when Moby Dick was a minnow ... by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      Occasionally eating fish is chronic exposure too. And larger doses vs chronic exposure could go either way as to which is worse. In the case of mercury, the body can filter out mercury, albeit very slowly, and very low levels have no noticeable effect.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    4. Re:Back when Moby Dick was a minnow ... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      it's deceptively dangerous it is not like a poison

      That's nonsensical.

      It is a poison. It's a slow-acting, low dose poison. but it's a poison nonetheless. It's difficult to estimate people's long-term exposures, because even very small levels of mercury loss from the body will have large effects on the cumulated dose over the decades.

      Your mental image of what a poison is, is not adequate to make safe predictions about what is and is not poisonous, and at what doseages.

      Do you remember Paracelsus' best-known dictum? If you don't know it, you really should.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  27. Re:Broken light bulbs. by jpellino · · Score: 1

    Any or all of which could be explained by the manner in which the bulb was broken and which body part was involved.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  28. Re: Broken light bulbs. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The neurological effects of mercury were not understood hundreds of years ago, nor did people understand that burning coal emitted it. So their behavior was out of ignorance. We know far more today, so China's emissions are not as excusable

    The long term negative economic and health effects of coal have been known about in the US for at least a few decades, and besides some cosmetic changes and this public relations "scrubbers!" effort, we haven't done a thing about it. In fact , our government has done everything it can do hide the fact that people are being poisoned across generations with mercury, because so many energy execs and owners, including certain coal-country billionaire siblings are big contributors, for and against politicians.

    Instead, senior Bush officials suppressed and sought to manipulate government information about mercury contained in an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) report on children's health and the environment. As the EPA readied the report for completion in May 2002, the White House Office of Management and Budget and the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) began a lengthy review of the document. In February 2003, after nine months of delay by the White House, a frustrated EPA official leaked the draft report to the Wall Street Journal, including its finding that eight percent of women between the ages of 16 and 49 have mercury levels in the blood that could lead to reduced IQ and motor skills in their offspring.[3]

    http://www.ucsusa.org/scientific_integrity/abuses_of_science/mercury-emissions.html

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  29. Re:And don't forget mercury in the CFLs... by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1
    Which would, presumably, be why the Republicans fought a war to eradicate slavery in the USA, right?

    Or did you think Lincoln was a Democrat?

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  30. Don't blame me by PPH · · Score: 3, Funny

    As soon as I heard that mercury was dangerous, I threw all my thermometers and thermostats in the garbage.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  31. "Surprise!"? Really? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    Surprise! More Than Twice As Much Mercury In Environment As Thought

    Here are a couple more Slashdot headlines in this new style:

    Fuck's sake! Facebook's Auto-Play Videos Chew Up Expensive Data Plans
    About Bloody Time! 3 Decades Later, Finnair Pilots Report Dramatic Close Encounter With a Missile

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  32. Re: Broken light bulbs. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

    besides some cosmetic changes and this public relations "scrubbers!" effort, we haven't done a thing about it.

    Nonsense. Scrubbers are not perfect, but they catch a lot of mercury and other pollutants. Furthermore, America has reduced the percentage of electricity generated by coal, and this percentage will continue to drop, since no new coal plants are under construction. With plenty of cheap shale gas, it is unlikely any more coal power plants will ever be built.

  33. This is great by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1, Troll

    Now there is a lot more mercury available to be put, in elemental form, into vaccines.

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
  34. Re:Broken light bulbs. by GarethIwanFairclough · · Score: 1

    From the (maximum of) 5 milligrams of mercury? What did you do? Break the lamp very carefully and then snort the contents?

    I might as well have done. No, I was trying to remove the dead bulb from an overhead lamp when it shattered in my face. Unfortunately, it was in my office at home so I had to keep working in that environment (trying to meet a daily word-count). Even with the windows and doors open it still affected me for several hours. Not pleasant, though it seems to have been temporary.

  35. Re: Broken light bulbs. by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    The stupendous of money lost and and used to cleanup up America's pollution could be done for a lot less in China and yield better results. The term is called "law of diminishing returns".

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  36. Re: Broken light bulbs. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    With plenty of cheap shale gas

    It's always cheap until the externalities get figured in. We thought coal was cheap until we started paying the price as a society for increased crime, increased poverty, increased health costs from mercury everywhere (also, the mercury in gasoline). Mining country won't be normal for several more generations to come thanks to King Coal. You know who never pays the cost for these "cheap" sources of energy? The people who profit the most from them.

    Now, the "clean, safe, and too cheap to meter" fuel du jour is "shale" and "fracking". Until we start talking about the real cost of things, any discussion of the way we get energy will be seriously defective and we'll keep screwing up.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  37. And the headline we all dread by gman003 · · Score: 1

    Good news! Slashdot Beta now live for all users!

    1. Re:And the headline we all dread by julesh · · Score: 1

      Good news! Slashdot Beta now live for all users!

      Extraordinary! Wave Of Geek Suicides Has Investigators Perplexed!

  38. Re: Broken light bulbs. by flyneye · · Score: 1

    If KFC could just use the Boeing Chicken Launching Cannon during Solar Plant working hours, it could be a tourist attraction and a place to get a Barbequed Impact Chicken sandwich. Bring the family!

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  39. Re: Broken light bulbs. by Snotnose · · Score: 1

    True dat. I was in Jr High (grades 7-9) in the 70s and I spent a lot of time in chemistry class pushing mercury droplets around with my finger.

  40. #1 Source of Environmental Mercury = Gold Mining by retroworks · · Score: 4, Interesting

    #2, Silver Mining. It turns out mountains don't come labelled as "gold" and "silver-only". As world affluence increases, demand for gold and silver increases. Today, affluent trapped from filters at gold mines produces more mercury than mercury mines. But the only mines "trapping" any mercury are in regulated western economies... most gold mining is in unregulated forests.

    Lamps, by the way, have jackshit mercury, less than a fraction of what they had when lamp recycling got started. Billions of dollars are being spent "recycling" lamps which have barely any mercury in them.

    At least the recycled mercury saves the environment, right? Oh. Nope. Read the great journalist John Fialka on WSJ 2006. Most of the mercury recovered from the recycling went to alluvial gold mining in Amazon and Congo river basins. http://online.wsj.com/news/art...

    I'm an environmentalist, but environmentalists 3.0 need to recognize past mistakes, and correct them, the same as engineers and software coders are expected to do.

    --
    Gently reply
  41. Re:Most mercruy is from natural sources-not power by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I like to know a little bit about where citations are coming from, you know?

    From the Wikipedia entry on the website where all of your citations come from:

    According to Alexa internet statistical analysis, What's Up With That? is ranked No. 9,282 in the U.S. and No. 24,144 world-wide.[17] WUWT receives more than two million visits per month.[18] Fred Pearce, environmental writer and author, described WUWT as the "world's most viewed climate website" in his 2010 publication of The Climate Files: The Battle for the Truth about Global Warming.[19] Matt Ridley of The Spectator described WUWT as having "metamorphosed from a gathering place for lonely nutters to a three-million-hits-per-month online newspaper on climate full of fascinating articles by physicists, geologists, economists and statisticians".[20]

    Patrick J. Michaels, climatologist and contributor to the IPCC First Assessment Report, described WUWT as part of a new "parallel universe" of emerging online publications, manned by serious scientists critical of world governments approach to climate change: "A parallel universe is assembling itself parallel to the IPCC. This universe has become very technical – very proficient at taking apart the U.N.'s findings."[21]

    Watts's blog has been criticized for inaccuracy. The Guardian columnist George Monbiot described WUWT as "highly partisan and untrustworthy".[22] Leo Hickman, at The Guardian's Environment Blog, also criticized Watts's blog, stating that Watts "risks polluting his legitimate scepticism about the scientific processes and methodologies underpinning climate science with his accompanying politicised commentary."[23]"There are many credible sources of information, and they aren't blog sites run by weathermen like Anthony Watts", wrote David Suzuki.[24]

    The Times named Watts Up With That? as one of the 30 best science blogs and described it as: "One of the more entertainingly sceptic blogs, written by a former TV weatherman. The ecofriendly blogger offers commentary on science, nature, climate change and technology, as well as 'puzzling things in life.'"[25] WUWT won the "Best Science Blog" award in the 2008 Weblog Awards, an internet organization that tallied 933,022 votes in 48 different categories for the 2008 awards.[26]

    In February 2010, climatologist Judith Curry, as a guest contributor, published an open letter on WUWT and other climate-related blogs, "On the Credibility of Climate Change, Towards Rebuilding Trust," in which Curry commented on the benefits of blog-led debate and called for greater transparency in scientists' work.[18] Also in 2010, Christopher Monckton published on WUWT his account of his "influence on Lady Thatcher's views about climate change during the 1980s".[27] Monckton, a skeptic towards the theory of anthropogenic global warming, also published a detailed rebuttal on WUWT in response to criticism directed at him by John Abraham, associate professor of mechanical engineering at University of St. Thomas.[28]

    Fox News has attributed to WUWT exclusive photographs used in FoxNews's coverage of the Deepwater Horizon oil rig disaster.[29]

    I'm not sure the blog site of a climate change denying weatherman and Fox News favorite is a solid source of information, but who knows? Anything's possible when there's money at stake.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  42. Mercury cycle? by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    Right, Mercury is horribly toxic, and releasing it in the environment is bad. But where do we get the mercury first?

    I guess it comes from the environment itself, which suggests some kind of mercury cycle. It was there before as a reasonably harmful compound, perhaps we can ensure it returns to this state?

    1. Re:Mercury cycle? by manu0601 · · Score: 1

      you sound libertarian

      Please don't insult me.

  43. Re: Broken light bulbs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    From your description it sounds like it wasn't the mercury so much as receiving a full dose of Obecalp.

    Did you seek medical attention?

  44. Re: Broken light bulbs. by uncqual · · Score: 1

    You can buy thermometers with a bulb of mercury at any Chinese drugstore.

    Awesome - thanks for the information.

    I hate digital fever thermometers - when I need one every five or ten years, the battery is dead (and the very reason I want to take my temperature is the same reason I don't want, nor to people in the outside world want me, to go out at 3AM to find and buy a new one or a new battery). Fortunately, I still have a "backup" mercury thermometer that's close to 40 years old - but I've wondered where to buy a backup for the backup should it meet an untimely demise.

    --
    Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
  45. Re:Broken light bulbs. by uncqual · · Score: 1

    He didn't mention -- he fell off the ladder while removing the bulb and fell 12 feet (cathedral ceilings!) and hit his head on the edge of his Steelcase desk from the 50's (the ones that a lot of Cop shows have on the set). But, I'm pretty sure it was the mercury that had that remarkable effect, not the anxiety of if mercury was harmful or the concussion and blood loss.

    --
    Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
  46. Re: Broken light bulbs. by Smauler · · Score: 1

    You don't have batteries at home?

    Keeping a few charged aaa batteries in the house is useful not just for digital thermometers. They are also used for other things which you may need too.

  47. A little late by Grand+Facade · · Score: 1

    After all the mercury that was spilled in gold mining operations....

    --
    Rick B.
  48. Not all coal is equal by dbIII · · Score: 1
    China's mercury emissions per tonne are very low since it's mostly not from places with almost no mercury unlike US coal - however they are making up for it with volume.

    You can buy thermometers with a bulb of mercury

    Not as big a deal as having it in the form of vapour - it's not even a huge deal in landfill unless there's enough water moving through to get it out of the landfill, or biological activity turning the metal into some pretty nasty stuff that can get into the food chain more easily. There's nothing immediately unsafe about an open container of mercury or blobs of it all over the floor from a broken thermometer - the problems arise when it can be breathed in or metabolised into something that's part of the food chain. Mark Twain had his hands deep in the stuff while gold mining with no signs of ill effects, but hatters went mad. That's the difference between it staying completely outside the body as a liquid that cannot penetrate and breathing the stuff in as part of a process involving heat.

  49. Re: Broken light bulbs. by uncqual · · Score: 1

    Most consumer oral fever thermometers use a button cell battery of a size I don't keep around.

    I keep lots of charged AA and AAA rechargeable batteries (Eneloop et al) around but that doesn't help me with the fever thermometers.

    --
    Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
  50. Re: Broken light bulbs. by dbIII · · Score: 2

    Scrubbers were not cosmetic. Ask someone who was paying attention in the US before 1970 to find out why, or ask someone in China today.
    Things are not perfect but writing off a major improvement in air pollution as cosmetic is somewhat misleading and unrealistic to the point which can lead to doubts about understanding and honesty.

  51. Re:And don't forget mercury in the CFLs... by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Or did you think Lincoln was a Democrat?

    Nixon or even Daddy Bush are closer to being Democrats than Republicans in the current situation, let alone Lincoln.
    It's a bit misleading to compare the political parties of back then to now since the values have changed so much.

  52. Passing comment by dbIII · · Score: 1

    It was there before as a reasonably harmful compound

    Not as such. Metallic mercury is rare. It's a bit of work to get mercury out of various ores, many of which would probably be safe to crumble up and eat since stomach acid is not going to reduce it.

    1. Re:Passing comment by manu0601 · · Score: 1

      But Hg2+ is also toxic right? I believe this is not a metalic Hg vs Hg2+ problem, but rather free mercury (or methyl-mercury) vs more complex compounds.

    2. Re:Passing comment by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I should have made it more clear: mercury in a form that can be metabolised is rare in nature. The problem arises when we reduce the ores (which are not "reasonably harmful") and spread stuff around in a form that can get into people and the food chain.

      Your "mercury cycle" suggestion is a bit weird and is a bit like suggesting an Iron cycle or Silicon cycle.

    3. Re:Passing comment by manu0601 · · Score: 1

      Your "mercury cycle" suggestion is a bit weird

      I was just wondering what prevented us from making sure mercury goes back to the environment in the same form we got it once.

    4. Re:Passing comment by dbIII · · Score: 1

      A lack of waste disposal sites at active volcanoes.

    5. Re:Passing comment by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      Dumping mercury-containing waste into an active volcano will only ensure that there is an increased mercury concentration in the fumes coming off the volcano in the next eruption, and in any hot water springs around the volcano (common).

      I think that you mean dumping it into an active subduction zone. But you'd need to put it several kilometres down into the subduction zone (that's drilling technology ; we sell introductory courses to drilling - about $2000/week excluding your accommodation costs. Or our instructor's accommodation costs if you've got a class of 4 or more.) unless you're willing to underwrite the security of your storage equipment for around 10 million years (to get natural subduction to a similar depth).

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  53. Re:Broken light bulbs. by Artifakt · · Score: 2

    And you were present to see this but didn't call an ambulance?
    There are some forms of heavy metal exposure that produce such symptoms and have near instantanious onsets. One account of such concerns a french soldier who poured and drank about 250 ml of wine passed through a 155 mm artillery piece barrel as part of a unit induction ceremony, and picked up a substantial Tungsten exposure. He had immediate onset of symptoms including seizures and rapid unconsiousness. All the symptoms mentioned by the parent poster are recognized for acute inhalation exposure to Mercury, but I'm running into paywalls trying to find out just how rapid their onset can be. Still the AC who generalized that heavy metal poisoning does not work that way is simply wrong, and is probably not picking up on the differences between gradual and rapid exposure, or inhalation vs ingestion, or both.

    And about your sig: You'll take your insight where you find it, like everybody else. and you'll like it!

    --
    Who is John Cabal?
  54. Re:Broken light bulbs. by penguinoid · · Score: 1

    I can confirm that a broken CF bulb is nasty. I had one break while hot, it stank to the high heavens and also gave me a headache. Had to ventilate the room for hours. Given that mercury is odorless (pdf), I suspect some other chemical. In any case, if the cold bulbs have a similar odor I think it would be very unlikely for someone to get mercury poisoning from these, and there is also the matter of the mercury emitted by coal power plants to consider.

    Overall I am pleased with CF bulbs, but one day hope to build a DC circuit with LEDs and battery backup for my lights.

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  55. Re:Most mercruy is from natural sources-not power by OneAhead · · Score: 2
    You missed the best part....

    The Heartland Institute published Watts' preliminary report on weather station data, titled Is the U.S. Surface Temperature Record Reliable?.[12] Watts has been featured as a speaker at Heartland Institute's International Conference on Climate Change, for which he acknowledges receiving payment.[55]

    Documents obtained from the Heartland Institute and made public in February 2012 reveal that the Institute had agreed to help Watts raise $88,000 to set up a website,(...)

    So, paid for by a fine organization that, apart from the climate change thing, is also known for denying the health effects of second-hand tobacco smoke, promoting franking, and openly advocating free-market environmentalism? A likely story!

  56. Re: Broken light bulbs. by Wing_Zero · · Score: 2

    http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=sr... I have a couple of these for various reasons (where did i put it this time.....)

  57. Re:And don't forget mercury in the CFLs... by craigminah · · Score: 1

    If you know anything about history it's the Republican party that freed the slaves and, "It emerged in 1854 to combat the Kansas–Nebraska Act, which threatened to extend slavery into the territories, and to promote more vigorous modernization of the economy." Democrats try to change history through repeated rhetoric saying what they want to be the truth and all the youth who get their news solely from Facebook or Twitter parrot their statements in a zombie-like monotone.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H...

  58. Re:#1 Source of Environmental Mercury = Gold Minin by dryeo · · Score: 1

    Is this the case in the US? I know mercury can be used to seperate gold from the other rocks (rocks float but gold sinks I think), but that is only done in third world countries that don't know about better ways to do it. I didn't think it was from pulling the gold from the ground, I thought it was just one possible process for seperating the gold.

    I don't know a lot about gold mining, but I think that is not true in the US at least.

    Its used in small scale placer mining. You use a pan (or sluice) to separate the heavier material, gold, iron and such, from the lighter rocks, then you add mercury to the black stuff at the bottom of the pan. The mercury and gold combine into an almagram (sp?), much like the paste the dentist mixes up to put in your mouth. Then you heat and evaporate the mercury leaving the gold and perhaps some silver. Since mercury is expensive, usually you evaporate it in a kind of still so you can recapture it. Used to be quite common, not sure now but placer mining is still popular with people making a living from it..
    Which also brings up the other use of mercury, making fillings and putting it into peoples teeth where it hopefully stays. Of course if you get cremated the mercury gets released into the environment.

    --
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  59. Re: Broken light bulbs. by julesh · · Score: 1

    Fortunately, I still have a "backup" mercury thermometer that's close to 40 years old - but I've wondered where to buy a backup for the backup should it meet an untimely demise.

    You should consider replacing it with a readily-available spirit thermometer, e.g. this one. Spirit thermometers have a smaller temperature range that they can measure than mercury thermometers, but are often more accurate over that range, and if you just want one for medical purposes, you're not interested in any temperatures outside a very narrow range anyway. Plus, when that untimely demise eventually happens, it won't create a health hazard that requires careful cleanup.

  60. Re:Broken light bulbs. by julesh · · Score: 1

    All the symptoms mentioned by the parent poster are recognized for acute inhalation exposure to Mercury, but I'm running into paywalls trying to find out just how rapid their onset can be.

    At a concentration level similar to the ones you're likely to see in the few moments after breaking a lightbulb, symptoms of acute mercury inhalation exposure require "a few hours" of exposure to develop. The patients in this review each absorbed a dose similar to the complete mercury contents of a typical CFL; it seems unlikely that an accident of the type described would result in more than a few percent of this amount of absorption, as the instinctive response to the bulb breaking - closing your eyes and exhaling - will prevent most of the contaminants entering your system. Also, unless the lamp was turned on at the time it broke, it is unlikely that more than a small percentage of the mercury was in vapour form.

  61. Re:#1 Source of Environmental Mercury = Gold Minin by julesh · · Score: 1

    #2, Silver Mining. It turns out mountains don't come labelled as "gold" and "silver-only". As world affluence increases, demand for gold and silver increases.

    Don't worry. It turns out that the cost of mercury is rising much faster than the cost of gold. Another decade or so of this, and it will be more economical for the gold miners just to sell their mercury stocks straight back to us.

  62. Re:Broken light bulbs. by CraterGlass · · Score: 1

    Congratulations. Break just 149 more and you will have equivalent mercury exposure to eating one fish fillet. Reverse placebo effect anyone?

  63. Re:Most mercruy is from natural sources-not power by gtall · · Score: 1

    Hmmm....so they are promoting Congressional postal propaganda (franking)...those bastards!!

  64. Re: Broken light bulbs. by gtall · · Score: 1

    Oh, so you mean the EPA is requiring what used to be called "externalities" be paid by the industry involved instead of imposed as a health tax on the rest of Americans? Those bastards.

  65. Re: Most mercruy is from natural sources-not power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The irony of someone citing Wikipedia to show some other website is biased and inaccurate.

    "I know your site sucksw because Wikipedia, where anyone can post anything, says so."

  66. Re: Most mercruy is from natural sources-not power by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    The irony of someone citing Wikipedia to show some other website is biased and inaccurate.

    The difference is that Wikipedia has citations to actual sources that you can check yourself.

    The people who accuse Wikipedia of bias never seem to point out what the bias is.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  67. Latex condoms? by Squidlips · · Score: 1

    Mad as a hatter

  68. Re:CFL Bulbs by Qzukk · · Score: 1

    Actually, it's all the non-compact fluorescent light bulbs. Nobody ever read the disposal instructions for those, and they're great for swinging around like light sabers, especially if you stand under a transmission line so the EM field lights them up.

    --
    If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  69. Re:And don't forget mercury in the CFLs... by Qzukk · · Score: 2

    And of course the non-compact ones that have been in your kitchen for decades, you took those to the recycler too when they burned out, right?

    --
    If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  70. Re: Broken light bulbs. by sudon't · · Score: 1

    Are you confusing leaded gasoline with mercury from coal emissions? Because I haven't yet heard of mercury being blamed for the rise of criminality in the twentieth century.

    --
    -- sudon't

    Air-ride Equipped

  71. Re:#1 Source of Environmental Mercury = Gold Minin by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    I don't know a lot about gold mining, but I think that is not true in the US at least.

    We've been mining the USA for a lot longer than we've had an EPA. I live in Lake County, CA and I have an RO filter because there's a hell of a lot of stuff around here in the water which is harmful for three big reasons. The first reason is that the area is volcanic, the second is that it's agricultural, and the third is not just silver mining but also outright cinnabar mining. Luckily, I live on the side of the lake which is relatively clean. Clear Lake has a lot of thermal turnover, though...

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  72. Re: Broken light bulbs. by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

    " Scrubbers are not perfect, but they catch a lot of mercury and other pollutants."

    Yup, and they dump them into ash ponds, which are toxic cesspits the power companies conveniently ignore until they burst their containment.

    One burst last year in the southeastern USA. The environmental damage was significantly worse than Deepwater horizon.

    There are 5000 _known_ ashponds of the same or larger size in the USA.

    Catching the bad stuff and putting it somewhere is not the same as mitigating the overall problem.

  73. Hg takes time to be mobilized by bbsalem · · Score: 1

    I live in California where Hg occurs in nature and was used in extraction of gold from ores and has a latency in sediments shed from mining in the Mother Lode. USGS has been looking for the signature of Hg in sediments and it may be delayed by the mobilization process. More was applied to ores than has yet appeared in sediments. My source for the path of Hg in sediments comes from a video I saw authored by USGS in about 2000. I am sure that there are links to papers on the subject. Part of the problem of Hg in the environment in California is that its ores are found in the Coast Range and so it is a natural constituant of the environment. Most of the time it is pretty insoluable.

    I mention this because that is what the chart in the link from the article seems to indicate. The spike in total Hg at 1970 and its elevated concentration is due in part to landfills, but the more recent uptick seems to be due to its mobilization in the atmosphere. This would coincide with the concern from USGS about its path in sediments. The metal is pretty insoluable, but conversion to its salts and organic versions are more volitile and take time, decades, to appear in the environment.

  74. Re: Broken light bulbs. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure why I put the gasoline thing in there. I was drunk. It was the first Sunday of football season and was drinking gasoline with mercury in it.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  75. Re:You are wrong (ReACT project) by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I'm not ready to buy a power company telling us how great they are as proof that they're not dumping the scrubbed pollutants into ash ponds.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  76. Re:"Externalities" by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    So, you don't believe there are external costs to things, like the cost of protecting the oil industry by fighting Middle Eastern wars?

    Do you believe the cost of the Fukushima cleanup should be figured into the cost of the electricity the plant produced? Do you believe that there were any costs associated with lead being used in paint for decades?

    Of course there are externalities. You are the first person I've even seen deny they exist.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  77. Re: Broken light bulbs. by GarethIwanFairclough · · Score: 1

    From your description it sounds like it wasn't the mercury so much as receiving a full dose of Obecalp.

    Did you seek medical attention?

    Ho-ho-ho. Have an internet.

  78. Re: Broken light bulbs. by sudon't · · Score: 1

    You should know better than to drink and post!

    I'm not sure what specific problems are caused by mercury exposure, but lead from leaded gasoline has been correlated with the rise in crime during the twentieth century. To my knowledge, gasoline contains no significant amount of mercury, if any. I think most of our mercury exposure comes from seafood and coal plant emissions. Is mercury thought to be responsible for behavior problems, as well?

    --
    -- sudon't

    Air-ride Equipped

  79. Re:Most mercruy is from natural sources-not power by OneAhead · · Score: 1

    Heh lol... looks like my autocorrect is the product of a right-wing conspiracy

  80. Re:#1 Source of Environmental Mercury = Gold Minin by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    and the third is not just silver mining but also outright cinnabar mining. Luckily, I live on the side of the lake which is relatively clean

    Hmm, good enough reasons to consider appropriate precautions. And considering that we don't know what the safe lower exposure limit for mercury is (assuming that it's significantly different to the homeopathic concentration), that's going to need some careful thought.

    and I have an RO filter because there's a hell of a lot of stuff around here in the water

    Sorry, what's an "RO filter"? Run-Off? (I wouldn't have thought that snow-melt and rainfall from a clean roof would have picked up much ; unless you're horribly dusty, when you've got other issues to attend to.)

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  81. Re:#1 Source of Environmental Mercury = Gold Minin by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Sorry, what's an "RO filter"?

    Reverse osmosis, which uses water pressure both to push water through a plastic membrane (the osmosis part) but also to back-flush the filter. An "efficient" RO filter wastes about 10 parts of water for each 1 part filtered, but we have a well and a septic system so no harm done really.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  82. Re: #1 Source of Environmental Mercury = Gold Mini by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    Ah, got you. Still needs appreciable power, but being a continuous load, that's not a major issue. The water makers on board are RO too, feeding and washing a couple of hundred (very) sweaty bodies. But for big fresh water requirements (hundreds of cu. m. ) we bring in non-potable water on one of the flotilla boats.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"