Slashdot Mirror
2015 Corvette Valet Mode Recorder Illegal In Some States
innocent_white_lamb writes: The 2015 Corvette has a Valet Mode that records audio and video when someone other than the owner is driving the car. Activating the Valet Mode allows you to record front-facing video as well as capture audio from within the car so you can help keep your Corvette safe when it's in the hands of others. Well, it turns out that recording audio from within the car may be considered a felony in some states that require notice and consent to individuals that they are being recorded. Now GM is sending notices out to dealerships and customers alerting them to this fact as well as promising a future update to the PDR system.
Isn't the inside of the car is privately owned by the owner of the car?
I'm sorry your Corvette is being cited for child pornography and its distribution....
This car monitored for quality assurance.
If you put a sign up in ALL your cars stating "Warning, some cars of this model may be have cameras that can recorded you." where the driver may see it, that would probably make it legal.
excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
Yeah, this seems like a pretty easy fix. Just a little message on the radio or clear sticker on the instrument panel. Done.
Its not illegal as long as you mention "Hey, my car has video cameras in it." before you hand them the keys.
Whats illegal is taping them without their knowledge. They could potentially make a call to their lawyer or doctor after they park it and you could unintentionally record privileged information. At some point such systems will be so common you wont have to mention it anymore.
it keeps them safe after the fact. I take it you have never used valet service or had your car in for work before. Its almost impossible to get a valet to fess up about a scratch on the car, or that he took the car out for a joyride. This camera is more about keeping valets honest than anything else
have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
If you don't need to get consent from your valet that it's natural that the hotel doesn't need your consent for recording what you say in your room (which is actually their room).
Is it all right for you ?
In my state recording audio without consent of all parties present is illegal, full stop. The fact that it is illegal also makes it inadmissible in court.
Of course, lots of things that are illegal aren't prosecuted, and this tends to be one of those things. However, it definitely is against the law.
Valet mode also locks storage compartments, and disables the stereo. corvette commercial hawking the feature
I agree with the rest of your post ... but that paper you sign on the dotted line when you register?
That's a contract stipulating what they'll give you, and what they expect from you.
I know I've never stayed at a hotel which didn't have the "sign here" form. You probably didn't read it, but you did sign it. At the very least, you agreed to be responsible for damages and your bill.
Unless of course you're in the habit of staying in anonymous, cash-only hotels rented by the hour. But then it's a totally different thing.
Lost at C:>. Found at C.
Nah just encrypt the audio channel. Which can be decrypted by the manufacturer upon a proper subpena. Most states allow exceptions if a recording is made exclusivly for legal purposes.
actually, in England if one party to a conversation consents to it being recorded, then anything goes (Data Protection Act 1998 Section 36, which also explicity covers your waiving your rights to anything upon entering MY HOME particularly when not invited). Any individual acting in a public capacity in any given situation waives his right to privacy, period (Stafford, per Munby J). Acting in a public space, even within the confines of a private conveyance, implies consent to being monitored (various local ordinances covering CCTV and audio recording in an enclosed space).
My question to you, is where are your citations to reinforce your claims of such activity being "illegal, nearly all over the world"? BTW, ignorance of the Law is not an excuse to break it.
Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
It would have to be conspicuous enough that it would be obvious to a prosecutor, judge, or whoever else enters the mix.
Why does it have to be conspicuous? Just put it in a sealed box and tell the Judge he can see the EULA after he buys the car, after which point he will no longer be able to return the car. There is legal precedent.
If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
There is no natural law obligation to get consent from someone who is driving *my* car.
Next time the valet's name tag reads "John Locke," make sure you point that out.
>If you're driving a sports car and parking is a few blocks away those guys are fighting to get to park your car instead of Grandpa's Cadillac next in line. Frankly, it's just too much fun
Most sports cars also make the car weak and wimpy when the valet key is inserted. Engine RPMs are capped, suspension is softened like crazy, acceleration is less than half of what it is when unrestricted, etc. Not to mention a special trip meter that shows up (next to the odometer) that tracks total miles driven while the valet key was used. This helps cut down on joyriding.
-1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.