Slashdot Mirror


CEO of Spyware Maker Arrested For Enabling Stalkers

An anonymous reader writes: U.S. authorities have arrested and indicted the CEO of a mobile software company for selling spyware that enables "stalkers and domestic abusers." The U.S. Department of Justice accuses the man of promoting and selling software that can "monitor calls, texts, videos and other communications on mobile phones without detection." The agency pointed out this is the first criminal case based on mobile spyware, and promised to aggressively pursue makers of similar software in the future. Here's the legal filing (PDF). The FBI, with approval from a District Court, has disabled the website hosting the software.

"The indictment alleges that StealthGenie's capabilities included the following: it recorded all incoming/outgoing voice calls; it intercepted calls on the phone to be monitored while they take place; it allowed the purchaser to call the phone and activate it at any time to monitor all surrounding conversations within a 15-foot radius; and it allowed the purchaser to monitor the user's incoming and outgoing e-mail messages and SMS messages, incoming voicemail messages, address book, calendar, photographs, and videos. All of these functions were enabled without the knowledge of the user of the phone."

9 of 195 comments (clear)

  1. But its perfectly Ok for the NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Double standards... gotta love'em

  2. Can't let anybody but the NSA have the GOOD toys.. by He+Who+Has+No+Name · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's not an arrest for enabling stalking. It's an arrest for enabling *unapproved* stalking.

  3. Not sure about this. by Dan+East · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm not sure about this legally. The software does not infect devices, nor does it get installed through deception. It is purchased and installed by someone who has access to the device. The person who installed the software without the owner's permission (assuming that person doesn't own the phone in the first place) would be responsible for any illegal actions. An analogy is trying to bring a lawsuit against a company that produces baby monitors, because someone put a baby monitor in someone else's home without permission or notification in order to stalk them. There are legitimate uses for the software, for example a parent wanting to monitor their minor child's use of the phone. Or I might would put it on my own phone in case my phone is stolen or lost.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
  4. Obvious answer by fyngyrz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That'd be the American public you're asking about.

    When congress decided to shove the PATRIOT act up everyone's colon, lubricated only by a healthy dose of TSA, all the American public did was enquire how far they should bend over. They're still bent over. The majority likes it that way. Because fear. Unreasonable, agit-prop and ignorance based fear.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  5. Re:Cue the TLA jokes... by houstonbofh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The company's only issue was a failure of marketing - they were trying to sell it to the wrong audience.

    Or just that the government hates competition.

  6. Re:Can't let anybody but the NSA have the GOOD toy by houstonbofh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What kind of idiot would approve of someone stalking them?

    Voters.

  7. Re:Sounds great... by vomitology · · Score: 5, Informative

    Depends on where they are. In many states, it's legal as long as one party is aware the call is being recorded.

    --
    ~Knowledge is knowing that a tomato is a fruit, but Wisdom is knowing not to put it in a fruit salad.
  8. Offensive by sycodon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is something offensive about saying these kinds of activities are perfectly fine for representatives of the State, yet illegal for the citizens of the State.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  9. Re:But... the children!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As an IT tech who has been REQUESTED to install this software on clients' childrens' devices the summary seems to leave out one vital fact: It does need Administrative rights to install in the first place. That means access to the iTunes account and/or administrator access on Android. This typically will mean physical access to the device in the first place. It *IS* marketed to paranoid parents and bosses for monitoring children/employees. So unless your stalker is STEALING your phone to install it, you only have to worry about family members..