Slashdot Mirror


UK Government Tax Disc Renewal Website Buckles Under Pressure

An anonymous reader writes When you pay the tax on a road vehicle in the UK, you used to get a paper "tax disk" to affix to the inside of your car windshield. However the relevant records are documented electronically anyway, inspiring the government to replace the paper system with a purely online one. Unfortunately said system was still in beta when it launched today and predictably, it has broken under user demand. No alternative system is available. (The licensing agency actually ran out of the paper disks more than a month ago, and has been printing them out on normal office paper and asking vehicle owners to cut out the circle themselves.) The initiative is part of a larger "digital-first", restructuring of how the government provides services aimed at "meeting user needs".

145 comments

  1. Is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Another goverment project fails?

    They all do.

    If one would actually work perfectly from day 0, taht would be news!

    1. Re:Is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Which part of "Microsoft product" did they not understand?

    2. Re:Is this news? by 91degrees · · Score: 2

      They've had online renewal for years now. That worked really well the last few times I tried it.

    3. Re:Is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Survivorship bias. You only read about them if they fail. You don't read about the ones that work because it's kind of a boring headline: "Computer system works properly; nobody complains"

      Also I can count a large number of non-government systems that have folded under the zero-day load.

    4. Re:Is this news? by sjwest · · Score: 2

      It probably depends on how you use it, if you have a issued renewal reference number then its easy.

      Never done the hm gov prove your a 'human' registration route and if all the non car taxed cars applying for it on one day that might be the reason the system is overloaded as all the not taxed cars are being taxed all of a sudden.

      I lost my photo id/paper license from the dvla an that took a couple of weeks with a paper from a post office to fix, although the online version of it looked hard work so i opted for the paper form. That's when scheduled complexity bites governments

    5. Re:Is this news? by tehcyder · · Score: 2, Informative

      The anti-government extreme right wingers on slashdot have taken over the asylum.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    6. Re:Is this news? by randomhacks · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is bullshit. The website didn't fail on the 1st day. The website has been working for years. The problem is that it didn't scale perfectly when the load dramatically increased.

    7. Re:Is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not entirely correct in this instance - the system has been working fine since day 0 - the issue is that because people are confused by the rule changes, they all seem to be piling on the website at the same time, an accidental 'slasdot effect' if you like, and when they're not familiar with the system.

    8. Re:Is this news? by jeremyp · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is a Government Digital Service initiative. It will have been built using open source products almost exclusively.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    9. Re:Is this news? by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      No. They really have introduced a new system, that is allegedly still in beta

      https://www.gov.uk/tax-disc

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    10. Re:Is this news? by tibit · · Score: 2

      I've just realized that they have a fucking unicorn in their coat of arms. Probably one of the very few governments in the world that does that :)

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    11. Re:Is this news? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      Also, we're talking about a system that fundamentally just needs to collect some money and then update a simple database, on a scale of only thousands of users per day. If it weren't for the inevitable security/privacy/reliability concerns because this is an official government system, it's the kind of project a new web developer might write as an exercise in a day and a single properly configured web server would be expected to handle the entire load even at peak times.

      Even with those concerns, I am struggling to imagine how you could build a system with such simple fundamental requirements that falls over on its first day of service. The post mortem for the outage would be interesting to see; either someone was spectacularly incompetent or there is a lot more subtlety (or artificial complexity) behind the real world implementation of this system than we might expect from the outside.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    12. Re:Is this news? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2

      To follow up: I just spotted a note at the end of one of the articles suggesting that it wasn't actually the government's own systems that fell over, but rather something provided by Vodafone. I suppose that raises questions about why a system like this would need the services of a company like Vodafone for its implementation, but presumably this at least puts the outage in the "more subtlety in the real world implementation" group, which is reassuring in some ways.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    13. Re:Is this news? by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      They have to because it's Scotland's national animal. If the Scots had decided to bugger off last month we could have dumped it.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    14. Re:Is this news? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      It appears to be Vodafone, a telco, that failed to provide enough bandwidth.

      First day scaling issues.

    15. Re:Is this news? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      The US motto is "In God We Trust". One imaginary being is no more ridiculous than another.

      It's the coat of arms of the British monarch (The Crown). And the unicorn is has some Scottish significance. It may well date back to a time when Unicorns were thought to be real! BTW, the Scottish Unicorn was featured on Last Week Tonight, the week before the Scottish independence vote. Pretty funny.

    16. Re:Is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "The US motto is "In God We Trust""

      Uh...no its not. Its "E Pluribus Unum".

    17. Re:Is this news? by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      Probably followed the ITIL methodology. Spent the budget on process rather than building a useful system. ITIL being a British government system and all.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    18. Re:Is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's another government project gone child's play. Who knows, maybe when they create a digital solution for land use management or agriculture, they also suggest using the complementary colored chalk for coloring areas of paper.

    19. Re:Is this news? by davester666 · · Score: 2

      obviously the gov't went over their 10Gb/month cap.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    20. Re:Is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Joint venture company (AXELOS) with Capita nowadays

    21. Re:Is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The anti-government extreme right wingers on slashdot have taken over the asylum.

      Someone should audit all those Wingnuts.

  2. the government is collapsing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Save us, Norman Gates!

    Shhhhiiiiit, Black April is already six years overdue.

    1. Re:the government is collapsing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Save us, Norman Gates!

      More likely Bill Gates...

      It's a Microsoft system. Of course it collapsed under load.

    2. Re:the government is collapsing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's a Microsoft system. Of course it collapsed under load.

      Let me guess: the last version of Windows you used was Windows 98, you've never even seen Windows Server 2003, and you recommend Linux just because.

    3. Re:the government is collapsing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Let me guess: The Social Media Management script you're reading from was last updated in 2007. You work in a call center copy/pasting whatever your client pays for. You have no interest or knowledge of any computer software beyond BuzzBundle.

      Right?

    4. Re:the government is collapsing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft investing $1Billion in TCI
      Posted by mojoski on Friday January 02, 1998 @01:13AM
      from the one-more-step-towards-ruling-the-world dept.

      ZD-Net News is reporting that Micrsoft is about to announce a $1 Billion investment in Tele-Communications Inc. Looks like they might have control over the whole set-top box industry after all.. What do you think?

    5. Re:the government is collapsing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Astroturfers don't bother with Slashdot. They have bigger fish to fry.

  3. Is that a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clearly, the subjects are at fault for lacking discipline and misusing the service, and should educate themselves.

  4. Timely... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Slashdot, as always.... very timely with its news. Only a day late on this one!

  5. No alternative system is available ? by cardpuncher · · Score: 4, Informative

    How about using the telephone, or calling in at your local Post Office? Both alternative systems and both available.

    1. Re: No alternative system is available ? by jaseuk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yesterday the phone service was offline too.

      I know because I renewed yesterday.

      The website was fineby the afternoon.

      Why the service had trouble is a mystery to me, the only apparent difference is instead of saying your disc is in the post it now explains this is not required. Nothing new about anything else.

      Jason

    2. Re:No alternative system is available ? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Their telephone system doesn't have enough capacity either. The Post Office is the only option really.

      It's just incredible that they find this level of traffic surprising. They know exactly how many tax discs are due for renewal.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:No alternative system is available ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Previously you could buy the old tax disc with the car, now you have to re-tax the vehicle straight away so demand would spike.

    4. Re:No alternative system is available ? by stealth_finger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Their telephone system doesn't have enough capacity either. The Post Office is the only option really.

      What's the betting that the post office and folks on the phone are just using the website anyway.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    5. Re:No alternative system is available ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well actually they don't.

      You're assuming everyone previously had a tax disk, which isn't true. One of the main reasons for the switch to this new system is to install ANPR cameras in all fuel stations to make avoidance near impossible.

      So all the people without tax, would yesterday have been frantically trying to get it too I suspect.

    6. Re:No alternative system is available ? by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      The post office definitely isn't, they have always had an electronic system in place.

    7. Re:No alternative system is available ? by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      If you didn't have tax previously, you were driving your car illegally on the road (unless you were in one of the few tax exempt bands which don't require you to get a zero cost disc) and would have been caught long before by ANPR cameras already installed.

    8. Re: No alternative system is available ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      and of course the cost savings of not having to manufacture, print, and post the decals every year, and the lower government labor costs from an entirely automated online system, will surely be passed on to taxpayers in the form of lower fees, right? right?? RIGHT???

    9. Re: No alternative system is available ? by Xest · · Score: 1

      I suspect that normally people renew a week or two or three in advance because they need the paper disc to come through in time so they can display it before expiration at the end of the month and hence the load is spread across a few weeks.

      Now however, people probably just figured "Hey, I don't need the disc anymore, I'll do it last minute", hence why it was the last day of the month that it fell over- because everyone now figures they can wait until last minute to do it.

    10. Re:No alternative system is available ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And the site wasn't in beta either. I've been using it for years. Good to see slashdot's normal standards maintained.

    11. Re: No alternative system is available ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Direct debit payments - I bet a lot of people were waiting for them. Plus haven't they reduced the cost difference between 6months and 12months (not sure on that one?)

    12. Re: No alternative system is available ? by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 1

      you can't renew any earlier than two weeks in advance. I normally do it at the last minute and drive around without the disc for a couple of days. The police round here don't care, they can check to see if you've paid. Technically you can get fined for not displaying, but the police don't really care about the piddling crap - it's just more work for them.

      --
      (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
    13. Re:No alternative system is available ? by abigsmurf · · Score: 1

      Because of the news coverage, millions of people go a big reminder to renew their car tax and all decided to renew when they got home from work that day.

      Rather than having these people spread out over a week or so, they all decided to renew in what was likely just a 3 hour period so the system probably got many times the traffic it normally does.

    14. Re:No alternative system is available ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ANPR isn't new. They've been catching people with ANPR for a long time, and they've also been making note of vehicles where the tax was not renewed but the vehicle has not been scrapped or SORN'd.

      People who were driving without valid VED are still going to drive without valid VED and just hope they don't get caught, same as they did before.

    15. Re: No alternative system is available ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's an unspoken (not official, but the DVLA told me as much) grace period of about a fortnight where the police won't ticket you for failing to display if they can see that you paid on time and are obviously just waiting for the disc to arrive in the post. With the new system this clearly isn't needed.

    16. Re: No alternative system is available ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably this... people can renew weeks in advance, chances are everyone was waiting for the new system rollout *then* all hit the site on launch day, so rather than users being spread out over several weeks most of them tried to access the site on the same morning.

    17. Re: No alternative system is available ? by Xest · · Score: 2

      The authorities are actually pretty good on this, a friend completely forgot to renew his altogether and drove around for 6 months before realising, he phoned the DVLA to admit his mistake and they just told him not to worry, that people forget and as long as he's happy to pay it there and then that they wouldn't see any reason to pursue it as the fact he'd called them to explain was evidence enough in their eyes that it was nothing more than an honest mistake and I know my father forgot to display his new disc once, got pulled, but they took no action after checking he had renewed online (and this was back in 2004, so the ability to check online by the police has been in place at least a decade).

      But most people don't know that, and even those that do generally want to avoid the hassle of being pulled over even if it would've meant no action would be taken against you so make the effort to avoid driving around without a valid tax disc anyway.

      FWIW you most certainly can renew earlier than 2 weeks from expiration, that used to be the case when you could only renew from the 15th of the month, but you've been able to renew from the 5th for quite a while now just fine (at least 5 years), so you get the best part of a month to renew.

    18. Re: No alternative system is available ? by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      Lower fees? This is the system used for collecting a tax. The tax disc was there to prove to any passing police officers that you have paid the necessary tax to drive your car on UK public roads legally.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    19. Re: No alternative system is available ? by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      Technically, until recently it was totally illegal to drive a car around without a valid tax disc, even if you had paid for it. However, about five years ago, I received my new tax disc in the post and put it on the side ready to put it in my car the next time I used it. Then, about four years ago, I received my new tax disc in the post and put it on the side...

      ...and there was the previous year's tax disc still waiting for me to put it in the car. I managed to drive around for a whole year with an out of date tax disc without getting into any trouble. I can only assume that, if any police officer did look at it, they radioed my car registration back to base, found that the tax actually was paid and decided to do nothing about it.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    20. Re: No alternative system is available ? by tepples · · Score: 1

      Let me rephrase Anonymous Coward's question: And the UK will cut this road tax by the amount that it used to cost to print and post the disc, right?

    21. Re: No alternative system is available ? by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      The authorities are actually pretty good on this, a friend completely forgot to renew his altogether and drove around for 6 months before realising, he phoned the DVLA to admit his mistake and they just told him not to worry, that people forget and as long as he's happy to pay it there and then that they wouldn't see any reason to pursue it

      Sounds nicer than the message you get from the website... I let my tax lapse by about a month a few years back, renewed on the website (paying the full amount from the date the old disc expired). The website displayed a warning after I'd paid which essentially boiled down to "you've paid now, but you screwed up and so we might come after you at some point in the future and fine you £oodles".

      my father forgot to display his new disc once, got pulled, but they took no action after checking he had renewed online

      My wife spent about 2 months over seas a few years ago, her tax disc expired while she was away and she didn't realise. Caught a flight home on Christmas eve and got pulled over between the airport and home. Received a fine and points.

      FWIW, the MoT is a bigger problem anyway since they don't send out reminders - I managed to let mine lapse by about 6 months one year by mistake. I've not looked into the new "paperless" tax disc system - are they still sending out paper reminders for tax discs or are they assuming people are going to remember to renew?

    22. Re: No alternative system is available ? by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      The road tax is not hypothecated, it all just goes into the government's pockets and they'll decide what to do with the savings. They may choose to contribute it to a tax cut, or use it to help reduce the deficit or perhaps improve some service somewhere.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    23. Re: No alternative system is available ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tax Discs are not high on police priorities usually. We used to do some work for a regional police force, and my boss managed to park outside their HQ every 3 weeks for months with an expired tax disc.

    24. Re: No alternative system is available ? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      and of course the cost savings of not having to manufacture, print, and post the decals every year, and the lower government labor costs from an entirely automated online system, will surely be passed on to taxpayers in the form of lower fees, right? right?? RIGHT???

      Of course not. The UK is still recovering from the crash of 2008. It's a time of austerity. Tax cuts need to be specifically targeted only towards people who might donate to the Conservative party coffers.

    25. Re: No alternative system is available ? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      I think the point of not issuing tax discs now is that all enforcement work is done with Automatic Number Plate Recognition. Those cameras have been around for a few years, so they probably stopped manually checking some time ago.

      Last year I had a van with an expired tax disc that I needed to take to a motor auction. I planned my route very carefully to stay off the motorway and out in the sticks to be sure I didn't pass any ANPR cameras, and there was less chance of encountering an ANPR equipped police car.

    26. Re: No alternative system is available ? by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

      I wanted to pay y standing order. The website said go to the post office. I did. There was an hour long queue because of people trying to pay roadtax. I could not do standing order - the staff said "we have the forms but dont know how to fill them in. Use the web site." I paid 6 months. However the new system is designed to "help the public" by making it hard to buy second hand cars legally and stealing their money when they do.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    27. Re:No alternative system is available ? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Always? Blimey, that predates Colossus.

    28. Re:No alternative system is available ? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      I hadn't realised the police had access to petrol station forecourt cameras. You're right. It's not universal, but apparently some petrol stations do feed data from their private ANPR systems to the police.

    29. Re: No alternative system is available ? by Xest · · Score: 1

      I've still had tax disc reminders this year, and my partner only just got hers even though she's in this first October tranche of no paper disc folks so even with the change to paperless taxation they're still sending out the reminders thankfully.

      I agree about the MOT btw, I find it a royal pain in the arse because it's not like the tax disc where you get a reminder and do it online, as you say you get no reminder and then you're at the whims of the fucking garages as they determine when you must give up your car to them. It's so stupidly inconvenient, especially as we only do about 3000 miles a year on one of our cars- the fact it has to be MOT'd as much as the car we do about 25,000 miles a year on is just plain fucking stupid as it's the mileage wear and tear that makes a difference - the 25,000 mile a year car frankly never passes it's MOT so probably isn't really technically roadworthy for a short while before it's MOT given that it's being driven around with those failures prior to the test, whilst the 3,000 mile a year one hasn't failed an MOT for about 5 years now and never needs anything doing to it so it shows what a farce the MOT system really is - it's highly inconvenient and doesn't solve the problem it's meant to solve, low mileage cars are getting penalised for the sake of it, and high mileage cars are driving around unsafe regardless.

    30. Re: No alternative system is available ? by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      I agree about the MOT btw, I find it a royal pain in the arse because it's not like the tax disc where you get a reminder and do it online

      When I let mine lapse by accident, I was sorting out the MoT for my car when I thought "I don't remember doing the van this year... oh crap", checked and discovered that I had indeed not done the MoT for the van 6 months earlier.

      IMHO an annual check is a good idea, no matter how many miles you do - things still corrode when sat on your drive. I find the tax disc annoying because it's tied to emissions and claimed to be a "green tax" to discourage people from having vehicles that do poor mileage, yet I still have to pay that (quite expensive) same amount each year for my van despite the fact it only does a few hundred miles a year - I don't have a big problem with "green taxes" but I think they should be proportional and I don't see how charging the same for a vehicle that does a few hundred miles a year as one that does tens of thousands of miles is proportional at all. I would prefer the annual tax to be abolished and a proportional rise in fuel duty so that the total tax revenue would be unaffected. Although I know that if they did abolish tax discs they would use it as an excuse to increase fuel duty disproportionately.

      the 25,000 mile a year car frankly never passes it's MOT so probably isn't really technically roadworthy for a short while before it's MOT given that it's being driven around with those failures prior to the test, whilst the 3,000 mile a year one hasn't failed an MOT for about 5 years now and never needs anything doing to it so it shows what a farce the MOT system really is - it's highly inconvenient and doesn't solve the problem it's meant to solve, low mileage cars are getting penalised for the sake of it, and high mileage cars are driving around unsafe regardless.

      Last MoT for my van (which, as mentioned, does a few hundred miles a year): new brake pads + discs (corroded discs - something that low mileage vehicles suffer from), insecure headlamp (a plastic clip had aged, gone brittle and snapped. Official replacement VW parts would have involved replacing the entire headlamp mount for about £80, so it has been replaced with a couple of stainless steel nuts, which cost pennies and will probably outlast the official plastic thing :)

      In fact, everything my car has failed on in the past few years (which does significantly higher mileage) has been essentially age related rather than mileage related - all the mileage related stuff tends to get checked and replaced when I service it, so the higher mileage actually just ensures that parts have been replaced reasonably recently and therefore won't be failed.

    31. Re:No alternative system is available ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Petrol stations use ANPR and want access to the DVLA & police databases because driving off without paying is still an issue.

    32. Re: No alternative system is available ? by Xest · · Score: 1

      We keep both cars in the garage though, so corrosion isn't really much of an issue. I can see that if we have a bad winter with lots of salt being spread corrosion certainly becomes more of a problem, but on a 7 year old car, doing 3000 miles a year, being kept in a garage, there's not really much that can go wrong.

      I don't mind green taxes either as long as they're used to fund green things, but they never are. All money from supposed green taxes should go straight into funding installation of solar panels, and provision of electric car charging points and such.

      The issue I have with mileage based taxation is that you have to figure out what problem you're trying to solve, I think you have to ask the question, who should be penalised more heavily, the 100 school mums who drive a gas inefficient 4x4 a mile to a single school and a mile back each resulting in 200 miles of utter laziness emission production and creates massive congestion, or the country vet or doctor that has to travel 50 miles a day for his job otherwise we wouldn't get our meat and dairy produce that we depend on?

      Mileage based taxation, especially in rural areas, hits those areas hard, when the majority of pollution is actually being produced by inner city areas by people that could easily walk, cycle, or catch a train but are too lazy to do so. If you look at the places the government is failing to hit it's emission targets in it's entirely inside the cities, so emissions in the countryside where mileage is necessarily higher isn't really a problem, yet that's what mileage based taxation harms - of course, it also harms the necessary haulage industry too, and whilst I agree that in some ways that's not a bad thing if it means more stuff gets shifted overnight by rail for example, there's still a risk of damaging the lifeblood of the economy.

      And I suspect that's exactly why successive governments have stuck with VED- they don't want to harm essential drivers when it's really lazy school mums and so forth that are the bulk of the problem. In an ideal world you'd really want to tax based on the level of necessity of a journey so that necessary journeys (say, ambulances for example) aren't taxed at all, whilst people doing short journeys where they have no time constraints because they're too lazy to walk should be hit the hardest. This would have the dual benefit of also increasing exercise and hence reduce the NHS bill too, but how you'd ever determine it I don't know, and I think that's why we're stuck with VED- the Chelsea tractor mothers continue to pay it to drive their 4x4s around, but necessary drivers just buy more fuel efficient vehicles - it's far from perfect, but I can see why they've stuck with it.

    33. Re: No alternative system is available ? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      Part of the point about only being able to renew a few weeks before the end of the year was to prevent people from driving around for extended period without having an MoT. Insurance too. you had to produce a valid insurance cover note and MOT along with the log book when you renewed at the post office.

      I'm not sure how the online thing works - you'd probably have to plug in the MoT test certificate number and your insurance policy number. But it's been that long since I did that, I don't actually know.

      Road tax is down to £20 now. Hardly worth collecting.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  6. Australia can get it right by mjwx · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why cant the UK or US?

    We've had online registration and health care services for years. I haven't had to fill out a medicare form or go into a medicare office... ever. Not once in my adult life.

    As for online vehicle registration. Thats state based instead of national (well we only have 7 states and 2 territories) my state, Western Australia did away with registration stickers that you would affix to your windscreen years ago... Before I got my drivers license in fact. Apart from a the tired whines of a few dullards who ignore the reminder the government sends them about their expiring vehicle registration six weeks in advance it's been a fantastic success.

    If I need to know when my registration is up, I just look it up. If I want to know if the car I'm buying is registered (and for how long) I can just look up the number plate. About the only thing a malicious person can do on this website is pay my rego for me.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    1. Re:Australia can get it right by Richard_at_work · · Score: 5, Informative

      The sole reason the website broke is because there was a massive upsurge in people accessing it, well beyond the normal rate for tax renewals as people were for some reason waiting for it.

      I've done my previous 8 vehicle tax renewals online via the DVLA website just fine (yes, this isn't the first time you could buy your vehicle tax online, they've had it for years, all they are doing now is not sending you a physical tax disc) and the website has been fine - in this case I wouldn't lay all the blame on the service provider as they were working to previous usage levels that have been long established.

      As for health care services, well I've never had to fill out a form relating to health care in the UK, I just receive the care that I need. Oh, and I can book appointments, order prescription renewals and even choose a specific doctor to have an operation with online. Have done for years :)

      In summary, the system isn't as broken as the story makes out.

    2. Re:Australia can get it right by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Ahh,

      Fair enough. Looks like I put too much trust in /. editors.

      Also it seems that they were phasing out the paper tax discs rather than running out.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    3. Re:Australia can get it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Governments tend to employ job-for-life people who don't mix nearly enough with those in industry. Government management from the lowest to the highest levels are behind the times when it comes to IT so they end up spending more and achieving less than any free market company would.

    4. Re:Australia can get it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have auto-scaling these days. Telling your customers you are too busy so just go away isn't what any decent company would do. Telling your customers you have to buy these things by law or you will get a big fine, then making it as difficult as possible to buy them is typically government.

    5. Re:Australia can get it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What's your point? The UK moved to a fully online vehicle registration system yesterday, can't you read? They are just having some zero-day issues, as most large-scale sites do. And the scale issues here are caused by exactly the dullards you're talking about - people who left it to the last possible day to renew, so have to renew *now* and not at leisure sometime in the next month. For anyone else it's not an issue that you might have problems renewing on day one.

      One of the weird things about the new system is that you *can't* renew for someone else, which means renewal is complicated by the need to *find* that damned reminder letter (for the code number on it, which you need to enter to prove it's really you ... er ...)

    6. Re:Australia can get it right by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Queensland here, we did away with our registration labels yesterday.

    7. Re:Australia can get it right by Richard_at_work · · Score: 2

      Depends how much spare capacity you want to keep around - by some accounts, the upsurge in visitors peaked around 400% over the same day the previous year, so do we really think keeping that amount of spare capacity in reserve, or building on a public cloud system for extremely rare occasions is worth it?

    8. Re:Australia can get it right by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      The system isn't fully online, and you have always needed either the V5 document number or renewal number to buy your tax through the DVLA website anyway.

    9. Re:Australia can get it right by David+at+Eeyore · · Score: 1

      What he said! Victoria has just done away with annual rego labels this year; the police have on line systems in cars that can lookup the registration plate number and see if it is current. I just pay the the bill online and that's it now. very convenient.

      --
      "Never underestimate the power of very stupid people in large groups" seen on someone's blog...
    10. Re:Australia can get it right by Malc · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that healthcare in Australia is much more effort to participate in. They have some sort of copayment system, and most people on a reasonable income have to take out private healthcare insurance to cover this. So not quite as universal the NHS, or even a lot of Europe and large parts of Canada for instance.

    11. Re:Australia can get it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Apart from a the tired whines of a few dullards who ignore the reminder the government sends them about their expiring vehicle registration six weeks in advance it's been a fantastic success."

      Except for the fact that they're currently considering bringing them back as an option (As a visual reminder of the due date). There has been a large increase in drivers being caught driving unregistered vehicles. I'm glad you've never changed address and had trouble getting the government to properly update their records.

    12. Re:Australia can get it right by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Why cant the UK or US?

      We've had online registration and health care services for years. I haven't had to fill out a medicare form or go into a medicare office... ever. Not once in my adult life.
      .

      Living in the UK, I have never had to fill out a "medicare form" either. That's because we have a National Health Service.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    13. Re:Australia can get it right by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Living in the US, I have never had to fill out a Medicare form either.

      And don't have to use paper much when dealing with the hospital/doctor - usually there's one form I have to initial four times, then sign (I really hope I'm not promising my first-born to Satan on that form), which I read once many years ago, and now just initial and sign.

      Everything else - scheduling follow-ups, test results, etc. I get at their (nominally) secure (enough for HIPAA) websites....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    14. Re:Australia can get it right by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Not sure what you mean about the US not getting it right. Registration in the US is state by state; its not a federal issue.

    15. Re:Australia can get it right by Vanders · · Score: 1

      The UK moved to a fully online vehicle registration system yesterday, can't you read? They are just having some zero-day issues, as most large-scale sites do.

      As other posters have already explained, online payment for your tax disc nor the website are new at all. It is also not "fully online" as you can still pay at a Post Office, with cash even, if you wish. The only change that happened on the 1st of October was that you are no longer required to display a tax disc in your windscreen.

      The problem appears to be a surge in users trying to use the website for some inexplicable reason; probably a complete failure to comprehend on their part, and there are a bunch of confused people trying to renew when they don't need to.

    16. Re:Australia can get it right by Puff_Of_Hot_Air · · Score: 2

      I just receive the care that I need.

      Rubbish. Living here now in the UK (from Australia) for the past couple of years, I can categorically attest that the NHS is both tragically underfunded and conversely, moronically inefficient. Yes I can see a GP for free, but quotas and waiting lists are ridiculous and it simply means that you don't get referred and you don't get treated unless bits are literally dropping off you. Turns out my son has Autism; pity the UK hasn't grasped the concept of "early intervention". The Australian system of a good mix of public and private and actually looking at preventative healthcare (skin cancer checks, early intervention for Autism), is light years ahead of the hopelessly outdated and underperforming NHS.

    17. Re:Australia can get it right by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Just a typical self-righteous Aussie. They live so far away from everybody else, in their insular little world of mostly white mono-cultural bigoted bogans

      1956 called, it wants its demographic stereotypes back.

      Australia has changed significantly in recent years. Even in the late-80s, people were complaining that "Neighbours" didn't reflect the multicultural reality of the country, and it's far moreso now. 2011 Census reveals one in four Australians is born overseas.

      Just take the Tube from Heathrow

      Yeah, Londoners. Never guilty of assuming the world revolves around *their* f****g insular metropolitan bubble, are they?

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    18. Re:Australia can get it right by Puff_Of_Hot_Air · · Score: 1

      Just to add to the "moronically inefficient" bit. Now that my son has finally been recognised as Autistic (by going privately) we gain access to various services, one of which is a special nursery school. The staff of which are complaining they don't have enough students and spend most afternoons with no students at all! The absolute insanity of this makes me unbelievably angry. Between the ages of 2-5 is the only time you have to intervene in an Autistics life to really improve outcomes and here they are rarely diagnosed before school, while the intervention services sit by idle.

    19. Re:Australia can get it right by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      Yes [in the UK] I can see a GP for free, but quotas and waiting lists are ridiculous and it simply means that you don't get referred and you don't get treated unless bits are literally dropping off you..

      I dont think you understand how the UK NHS works. They make you wait for a long time for treatment in the hope that you will die first. It saves money.

    20. Re:Australia can get it right by Puff_Of_Hot_Air · · Score: 1

      See there would be logic to this if things like Autism killed you. They could encourage a high fat diet for example, or anything else that would take you out young and quickly (free base jumping lessons for the unemployed?). But Autism is often (look at the stats) a drain on the public purse for the lifetime of the Autistic. Common sense alone would suggest invest a little now to reduce the overall burden (no need to consider ethical issues for the moment). But there is no common sense here. The NHS has demonstrated to me the absolute categorical failure of large centralised planning (the same thing that undoes communism). The US may have a messed up health system; but it looks like if you have insurance you actually get timely effective treatment! Give me your broken capitalist model over this broken socialist model any day of the week.

    21. Re:Australia can get it right by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      It's state by state in Australia too. You've seriously never noticed that people group things together when they have similar properties before?

    22. Re:Australia can get it right by jd678 · · Score: 1

      Tell me about it; experienced brokenness caused by central control yet again today.

      Recent surgery has resulted in a painful infection, so I needed to go see a doctor today to get prescribed something to deal with it. My home practise had a walk in session but not starting until 10.30, so my options were either skip work for the morning to go there, or go into work and try and find something near work.
      So I went to work figuring I could see someone at the practise near there. They can't see me because I'm not registered with them, and at 20 miles away I'm too near to where I'm registered for them to be able to see me. So my options are go back home or go the emergency ward of the hospital! Worked out the timings and realised going back home and back again would take about the same time as queing at the hospital, and the transport was easier anyway, so ended up doing that. 4 hours out of work just to go see a doctor for 1 minute.

      I really miss the Australian system. It's far easier to just go to any practise you want if you need to rather than this sorry, can't do that attitude. Every practise actually competing with other also makes them far more eager to try and get your custom too.

    23. Re:Australia can get it right by operagost · · Score: 1

      Why are you assuming the US doesn't have online vehicle registration? Protip: every state does.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    24. Re:Australia can get it right by operagost · · Score: 1

      His point is that the ignorant original post claimed that the US doesn't have any online vehicle registration, which it does.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    25. Re:Australia can get it right by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      The NHS has demonstrated to me the absolute categorical failure of large centralised planning (the same thing that undoes communism).

      The problem with that argument is that the NHS has progressively got worse as it's moved from central planning to every more devolved decision making and private ownership.

      And the US comparison is bogus. They don't have universal coverage there, and still manage to pay 2.5 times more per capita for healthcare. If the NHS budget was multiplied by 2.5, then there wouldn't be any waiting lists - and they'd still have universal coverage.

      Similarly, the UK train system has only got worse as services were privatised. The franchisee for the East Coast Line pulled out prematurely in 2009, and since then it;s been run by the public sector. And under government hands it's the most efficient of all the franchises. Whilst the private sector organisations take subsidies, the East Coast line actually returns a profit to the government.

      Yet still, because of ignorant right wing ideology, the government is attempting to put this service back in to private hands. Insane.

    26. Re:Australia can get it right by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Do you (or your employer) have to do annual insurance paperwork?

    27. Re:Australia can get it right by Puff_Of_Hot_Air · · Score: 1

      the US comparison is bogus

      The US comparison is a bit of a sidetrack, and really only used to suggest how broken the UK's public health care system is. They main thrust here was to compare with the Australian system that is a mix between public and private. Private is incentivised by increased tax on higher income unless you have private health cover. Medicare (public health cover) will cover a portion of all private sessions even if you have no insurance, which further incentivises people to go private as it is more affordable. There are no silly rules about which doctor you can see. And doctors have no incentive (and more explicitly are not prevented) from referring you to specialists. In addition, as there is this good mix of public and private, the public system is not so separated as it is in the UK. This means that public GPs know what services might be available if you go private and even suggest it.

      So in Australia you get: Cheap affordable health care, particularly if something serious has gone wrong (it will be free). You get competition. I can't stress enough what a difference this makes. Yes the train system here in the UK is completely busted, but that's because they privatised a monopoly. That doesn't work. Allowing GP's to charge a little more for better service makes an enormous difference. I always paid a bit for each GP visit in Aus, but the value was completely worth it. And I only had to pay the gap between the base rate (covered by medicare) and the private provider. Here in the UK I have to pay the whole lot. In addition, as medical is at a state level, you actually get competition between the states that drives better outcomes by states learning from each other. You also get the ability to fairly easily go private when you need to. And it will be covered to some extent even without insurance. I never realised how effective this system was until I learning the "joy" of an underfunded universal health system.

      The NHS is really broken, people in the UK are just generally unfamiliar with alternatives (as was I before living here). Care can be good when you get it, but the beast is a big inefficient bureaucratic monster.

    28. Re:Australia can get it right by antdude · · Score: 1

      Because Australia rocks?

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    29. Re:Australia can get it right by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      people in the UK are just generally unfamiliar with alternatives (as was I before living here).

      That may be true but doesn't apply to me. I've lived for years in two other countries besides the UK and have been hospitalised and had a serious operation in a third. And I know a bit about the US system from following US political news.

      I don't know about the Australian system so can't argue with you there. But your original post seemed to be more than a little inspired by right wing private sector good/public sector bad ideology. And in the UK that has not been true.

      Furthermore, whilst the American "Obamacare" system is still private, it was characterised as "socialized healthcare" and predicted to be a failure. But in fact other than some short term issues with the web site, the outcomes of Obamacare so far have been very positive.

      And I only had to pay the gap between the base rate (covered by medicare) and the private provider. Here in the UK I have to pay the whole lot.

      Good. There are better things to do with NHS funds than using them to subsidise private patients. One of the reasons the NHS is more efficient than private insurance health systems is that it's a single payer system. Diluting it by encouraging people to go private would be a bad step.

    30. Re:Australia can get it right by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      I dont know that its safe to assume anything about other country's states simply because they use the same word. I dont know anything about AU's states, and would not assume that you have anything like the 10th amendment or that they look anything like the US's states. Different countries, different circumstances when the country was formed, different constitutions.

    31. Re:Australia can get it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you feel that way fine bugger of back to Oz then

    32. Re:Australia can get it right by Malc · · Score: 1

      I've lived in Canada, Australia and the UK. I prefer the system in Ontario where they are completely anti adding private in to the mix (although every company offering medical benefits for prescriptions seems to get ignored by voters). Private isn't the answer, and there's probably more to the story than that in Australia. Ridiculous rules like catchment areas (finally abolished this October) and limited opening hours, as well as lack of proactivity are the biggest failings in the NHS that I see. On the other hand there are some good things, like the cost of prescriptions and the fact that you don't need any additional coverage (e.g. private insurance in Australia to cover co-payments)

    33. Re:Australia can get it right by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Sure, but the post you replied to explicitly stated that car registration was state based in Australia. Making it obvious hat they meant by "the US not getting it right" - that the way it seems to be handled in the various jurisdictions in the US isn't as good as the way it is handled in the various jurisidictions in Australia. Whether that is true or not is another matter, but it has nothing to do with federalism and state rights.

  7. Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is the dumbest thing. You've been able to renew your tax disc online for years now and the site's always been fine. You don't have to replace you're existing paper disc until it expires so I don't understand how they've taken a functional site, added barely any additional load and made it fall over.

  8. The fallacy of "digital by default". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    The foremost problem is, of course, burning your bridges before you've well and truly tested the replacement. After that come the interesting ones.

    The fallacy here is believing that replacing the trappings will improve the mechanics. Here's how they should be doing it: Consider all the processes inside some department (starting with its overall utility; if below par, scrap department, then on to policies, and so on), then re-organise the internals to something that isn't a straight "we did this in paper thusly, now we do it electronically thusly", but is an efficient process based on the strengths of the (new) tools.

    And then you do your best to hide that you did it from the rest of the world, by providing several interfaces, digital and less so, to all comers. You want to couple your systems directly to ours? Here's our API documentation. You'd really rather call us? Sure. You want to use a website? Here's ours. You'd rather write us a letter? Please do.

    In contrast, here's what I see governments the western world over do instead: Cook up a shoddy website, probably throw in lots of "identification" malarky with either a "unified" but intrusive system, or stacks of usernames and passwords that you keep having to reset, elevate it to the new gold standard, see all function crumble. This is bad for a number of reasons, starting with "websites" being far less useful than paper even, certainly not useful to couple other digital systems with (why automate if you can't take the automating further from there?), and in fact not fit to stand up to the ages. Even cheap paper lasts 200 years, but websites last until the next web"standards" fad, which may be just an apple product release away.

    So, instead of the governments' shiny entrances into the new digital era, we have layer cakes of fail; good gigs for overpaid consultants but as we've seen and will see time and again, function and thereby service to the citizen, suffers.

    There's a good litmus test for this sort of thing, and it's hand-writing a letter to the department. Can you still get what you need that way, without further ado? If not, the automation has failed.

    1. Re:The fallacy of "digital by default". by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      Except the site in question's been up for years and working fine. It had a bit of trouble yesterday due to excess traffic but now it's fine again. This happens in the commercial world too.

    2. Re:The fallacy of "digital by default". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That doesn't change the argument in the least. Reasons why left as an exercise.

  9. I got my tax yesterday, no problem by dominux · · Score: 1

    the website was a bit screwed in the morning, and I had the wrong reference number with me (a SORN number doesn't work, you need the V5 number, or the renewal if you haven't SORNed it) it was for a car I don't use much and it failed the MOT last month, so I got it fixed and parked it off road to tax this month without the disc. I kinda thought it would be more exciting as one of the first cars without a disc, but if you have a taxed car you can now just throw away the disc, so my 16 year old Fiesta is not as exclusive and exciting as I thought it would be.

  10. I put it down to this by Chrisq · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is the dumbest thing. You've been able to renew your tax disc online for years now and the site's always been fine. You don't have to replace you're existing paper disc until it expires so I don't understand how they've taken a functional site, added barely any additional load and made it fall over.

    I put it down to many sites saying that anyone can check any cars status on the government's vehicle inquiry service (currently down). Loads of people want to check whether their friends and neighbours cars are legal.

    1. Re:I put it down to this by stoploss · · Score: 1

      Loads of people want to check whether their friends and neighbours cars are legal.

      Is this a cultural thing? Around here we definitely wouldn't be doing that to our "friends" and we would only do that to neighbors we actively hate to the point of almost being willing to frame them for crimes.

      Can you explain this from a cultural perspective?

      I can explain our cultural perspective: we generally dislike the government, so we would have to hate someone pretty badly in order to find it attractive to harm them by helping the government. Furthermore, this also seems offensive culturally because it represents meddling in others' affairs. Certainly not something one would do to a friend.

    2. Re:I put it down to this by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Britain has a lot of little Hitlers who resent rules, but nonetheless love trying to help enforce petty rules. They usually are employed somewhere as a "jobsworth" (google the term) but when they are off the clock they enjoy continuing to be a jobsworth-type of person.

    3. Re:I put it down to this by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      Loads of people want to check whether their friends and neighbours cars are legal.

      Is this a cultural thing? Around here we definitely wouldn't be doing that to our "friends" and we would only do that to neighbors we actively hate to the point of almost being willing to frame them for crimes.

      Can you explain this from a cultural perspective?

      I can explain our cultural perspective: we generally dislike the government, so we would have to hate someone pretty badly in order to find it attractive to harm them by helping the government. Furthermore, this also seems offensive culturally because it represents meddling in others' affairs. Certainly not something one would do to a friend.

      In general, Britain has an anti-sneak culture, so I doubt many people would literally report their neighbour. It's more likely to be general nosiness.

      In any case, the police have been able to do a live check on tax/insurance for ages now, so they don't really need members of the public helping them out.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    4. Re:I put it down to this by wildstoo · · Score: 1

      Simple: a lot of Brits have an authoritarian streak that applies to everyone but themselves. They want the State getting into everyone else's business, but not their own. It's a weird combination of self-righteousness and paranoia.

      If you think this might influence how they vote in elections, you'd be dead right.

    5. Re:I put it down to this by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      In general, Britain has an anti-sneak culture, so I doubt many people would literally report their neighbour. It's more likely to be general nosiness.

      Plus the urge to check your cars to make sure that they have "got it right".

    6. Re:I put it down to this by xaxa · · Score: 1

      In general, Britain has an anti-sneak culture, so I doubt many people would literally report their neighbour. It's more likely to be general nosiness.

      I could believe people check on their neighbour, find they haven't paid, but only grumble to their friends and other neighbours.

  11. Why is this news by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 2

    Any site will collapse if there is an unusually high volume of traffic. Why spend millions in hardware that is going to idle just to cater for the odd spike or /. effect. I don't even know why this is news? Are they going to post an article each time /. or twitter et al accidently drops someone's website because of a post?

    --
    There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    1. Re:Why is this news by gripfin · · Score: 2

      Why spend millions in hardware that is going to idle just to cater for the odd spike This is not the "odd spike" though. It's what they can expect every month end from now on. People will leave it to the last minute (knowing they can, and saving the cash flow) . If they want to smooth the traffic they should offer "renew any time in the month but we'll only take payment right at the end".

    2. Re:Why is this news by oneandoneis2 · · Score: 5, Informative

      > It's what they can expect every month end from now on.

      No it isn't. Literally nothing has changed about the system other than it no longer mails you tax discs afterwards - nobody's leaving anything to the last minute now that wouldn't have before, NOTHING has changed. This is an "odd spike" caused by people seeing the story everywhere of "you can look your car up online!" so instead of the usual trickle of people going there to update their tax once a year, they're getting flooded by half the country going "Oo, a website, must click!"

      The summary is BS, all the "before it's ready" is pure fantasy: This is a massive spike in visitors causing an outage, nothing else.

      --
      So.. it has come to this
    3. Re:Why is this news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any site will collapse if there is an unusually high volume of traffic

      Auto-scaling? CDNs? Cheap hardware and easy provisioning makes excessive capacity cheap in any case.

    4. Re:Why is this news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not true, now you have to buy tax when you buy a new car, rather than it carrying across owners. So there will have been a legitimate demand spike - saying nothing has changed is incorrect.

    5. Re:Why is this news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't it different in that you can now pay by installments? Setting up a direct debit for each user could create an additional and potentially problematic workload.

    6. Re:Why is this news by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      Err no. They really have got a new system brought to you by the Government Digital Service

      https://www.gov.uk/tax-disc

      Notice how it has the little beta tag.

      In summary, they have both changed the rules and introduced a new online application system at the same time.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    7. Re:Why is this news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any site will collapse if there is an unusually high volume of traffic

      Auto-scaling? CDNs? Cheap hardware and easy provisioning makes excessive capacity cheap in any case.

      But I'm sure you'd be screaming about government wasting tax money if they bought 5 times the server capacity that is normally required...

  12. I put it down to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There was a fair bit of coverage being all alarmist along the lines of "but how will you know if (car X, that isn't ours) is taxed or not?"

    Answer 1: there's a website where you can look it up.

    Answer 2: the car's not yours. It's none of your damned business whether it's taxed or not, and don't you have better things to do? The government are apparently content they can prevent car tax dodging, so that should be enough. We don't make people display a certificate of having done their tax return in their window after all!

  13. Increased Traffic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The change should not cause an increase in website traffic because the old tax discs are still valid until they expire normally.

    This website traffic spike must be caused by idiots that have failed to comprehend what is a simplification of the system.

  14. Phased in by Martin+Spamer · · Score: 1

    Or they could just waiting until their old tax disc expires/ receive their renewal notice before swapping to to the new system.

    The majority of people whinging on twitter are just idiots.

  15. "Windshield" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windscreen!

    1. Re:"Windshield" by onkelonkel · · Score: 1

      Boot.....Trunk....whatever. it's where you put the bodies.

      --
      None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
  16. Re:Try Heathrow Terminal 2 by biodata · · Score: 1
    >some idiot paid for them

    I think we know who paid for them.

    --
    Korma: Good
  17. Australia can get it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That's right! In NSW there are no registration stickers anymore. Now that all Highway Patrol cars have automatic licence plate readers there is no point in attaching a sticker to your car. Registration is all done electronically.

  18. Re:Try Heathrow Terminal 2 by geniice · · Score: 1

    Heathrow is owned by Heathrow Airport Holdings. Private sector. The tax disc website is by Government Digital Services. Public sector. The savings they have made by moving government functions online are in the billions.

  19. Three times fast by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    Just try saying that fast three times: tax disk; tax disk; tax disk.

    I hear they're also available where they sell seashells by the seashore.

  20. Glad to be American ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    ... cut out little stickers? Hell, I can't draw and stay inside the lines and stuff.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    1. Re:Glad to be American ... by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      About 10 years ago, maybe less, Texas DMV replaced stickers with a new type that could be printed on from either an inkjet, or laser printer. The form (with the sticker) is in standard letter format (8.5" x 11"). Once you receive the paper from either mail or in person at the DMV, you simply peel off the sticker from the letter and affix to the windshield. It's a brilliant change. Basically, no more proprietary plastic stickers that can only come from a factory source.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:Glad to be American ... by tibit · · Score: 1

      In Ohio, the stickers are printed on label printers, on a "secure" stock. Nothing special here - the driver licenses and state IDs are printed on off-the-shelf laminator printers, again using "secure" stock. I wouldn't be surprised if the "secure" stock were made in China and just offered for sale by some local company that has Ohio gov't contract. Printing of anything in China is really cheap, and access to high-tech printing technologies is rather easy.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    3. Re:Glad to be American ... by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      A little OT, but drivers license in Ohio are laminated?!?! Texas uses to have those about 15 year ago, but they lead to fake IDs being created (delaminate and swap photos, etc). Now, as with California, Texas DL is hard plastic with a 2D barcode on the back.

      Back OT, I think the stock is used on-site at the DMV vs using preprinted plastic stickers is due to cost. Registration stickers are replaced once a year anyways, and they can be sourced online mail order or at any DMV office. So cost, availability, and time of delivery are minimized. The UK might want to adopt this method too.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    4. Re:Glad to be American ... by tibit · · Score: 1

      The lamination is not done on a laminator you might find in your local copy store. The pieces laminated together are multiple layers of plastic stock. No paper, no stand-alone photos. Delamination is not really possible without destroying the ID. What you call "hard plastic" has been laminated from multiple layers of stock that doesn't seem to be anything special. Many European IDs were more spoof-proof a dozen years ago, though.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  21. That's because you block ads by tepples · · Score: 1

    You don't read about the ones that work because it's kind of a boring headline: "Computer system works properly; nobody complains"

    You usually read about success stories in advertisements: "$our_service helped $client take its service online and save $big_bucks. [See How]" If you block ads, you don't see them.

  22. fun by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    They should do that in America. DMV: now with arts and crafts! Cut out your own documents and licenses.

  23. decentralized digital by silfen · · Score: 1

    "Digital first" does not have to mean "create a gigantic, centralized, privacy invading registry", like governments frequently seem to think. "Digital first" could well mean "print a digital signature as a QR code that we can then verify using a reader if need be". You know, it could work like movie tickets and boarding passes. Such a scheme is also much easier to administer and much more resistant to failure.

    The identity card debate is often messed up in just the same way: an identity card need not be coupled to a central register; quite to the contrary, giving people a physical token that establishes their identity and can carry data on a smartchip in principle reduces the need for centralized, insecure databases and could be privacy enhancing.

    Digital technology can either enhance or destroy privacy, depending on how we use it.

    1. Re:decentralized digital by nsayer · · Score: 1

      Why bother with the QR code? The car has a unique identifier attached to the back bumper (as well as a globally unique one in the corner of the windshield). That can be looked-up to verify that the registration is valid, if need be.

    2. Re:decentralized digital by silfen · · Score: 1

      Why bother with the QR code? The car has a unique identifier attached to the back bumper (as well as a globally unique one in the corner of the windshield). That can be looked-up to verify that the registration is valid, if need be.

      A globally unique identifier requires verification in a central database. A digital signature can be verified offline without a central database. That's my point!

  24. Are Tax Discs by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    The same as registration stickers here in the U.S.?
    > Because for a very long time we here just piled the stickers on the plates. Then when a corner got too full you'd pile them on other corners.

    Now parking permits are another matter entirely. They are easily replicated and nobody would know the difference.

  25. Another solution by nsayer · · Score: 1

    I remember a british sitcom some time ago (perhaps it was one of the last seasons or reincarnations of Are You Being Served?) where some Londoners found themselves living in the British countryside and at one point the issue of tax discs came up. One of the locals just pointed out that they used a beer coaster. The local constabulary just took it on faith that everybody in the area was honest.

  26. Tough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You get a tax reminder a whole 2 weeks before the renewal is due and you can arrange for the new tax anytime in that period with no additional cost. So you know who is to blame if you leave something important to the last minute and then experience issues that leave you liable for legal repercussions? Yourself.

  27. Arse, Elbow, Booze-up, Brewery spring to mind. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will someone get prosecuted or fined for this debacle?

    Of course not, so we will continue to see this sort of ineptness for as long as the corrupt and incompetent rulers of the UK (and other countries similarly) look after their back-hander cronies in the businesses that get these contracts, until the earth burns up in the Sun's Red Giant phase.