Slashdot Mirror
NASA Finds a Delaware-Sized Methane "Hot Spot" In the Southwest
merbs writes According to new satellite research from scientists at NASA and the University of Michigan this "hot spot" is "responsible for producing the largest concentration of the greenhouse gas methane seen over the United States—more than triple the standard ground-based estimate." It covers 2,500 square miles, about the size of Delaware. It is so big that scientists initially thought it was a mistake in their instruments. "We didn't focus on it because we weren't sure if it was a true signal or an instrument error," NASA's Christian Frankenberg said in a statement.
Link to a proper article about it. http://news.agu.org/press-release/satellite-data-shows-u-s-methane-hot-spot-bigger-than-expected/
Trying to become famous by taking photos. Visit my homepage please.
Fracking has been responsible for a big decline in US greenhouse gas emissions. Lumping the "entire established fossil fuel industry" together as if coal, oil, and gas were all the same is just idiotic.
Between 2003-2009, the region released 0.59 million metric tons of it into the atmosphere
While interesting to understand where it is coming from, that's still a tiny amount. For comparison, total human production of CO2 is 29000 million tons per year.
For UK and European readers, "the size of Delaware" is just a tad more than a fourth of "the size of Wales".
-- That grumpy BSD guy - http://bsdly.blogspot.com/
Looks like those aliens are trying to alter our environment through massive methane production again, somebody should let Charlie Sheen know.
Going 10-10 Good Buddy.
... the guys at my pub say that "all this global warming shit is fucking bullshit" and "if they want methane they can sniff my ass"
So it's one Delaware on the surface. But how many Delawares deep is it? ...which makes me wonder, if a Delaware is a unit to measure surfaces and has its equivalent in mi^2 or Km^2, would a Delaware^2 be applicable for volumes? or would we be talking fourth-dimensionally with mi^4 or Km^4 dimensions equivalents??? ... also, are we taking into consideration the topographic profile of Delaware, the state, or is it being flattened out?
I need my coffee....
That stinks.
Where have the nerds gone?
Anomalies are exactly the first thing you should focus on, to determine if there are errors with the observation or with the hypothesis. A real scientist worth his salt would never ignore an anomaly, which makes me wonder, just who is NASA hiring these days.
...it's over Rush Limbaugh's house.
-5 Flamebait
Table-ized A.I.
Damn you, I can't get that B52's song out of my head now
Table-ized A.I.
NASA Finds a Delaware-Sized Methane "Hot Spot"
When does it hit the Earth?
It took you two minutes to type that? That's pathetic. I can type that much in about 10 seconds.
People like you.
case closed!
What are you talking about? Did you even read the article? They are saying that the methane gas is coming from fossil fuel extraction. The article also says to put a hold on fracking, until they study more. That doesnÃt sound like anything the energy industry would say. We caused this huge methane gas problem and they think fracking could make it even worse. I think you have been so brainwashed that you just assume things without using a critical mind.
Considering that the shitty *ngh* Vice *retch* article also states how "The hot spot predates fracking", maybe the equivocal suggestion to "zoom out from fracking" is meant as a call to stop looking at fracking as the main culprit (i.e. "zoom out" from it) for the release of methane?
Meaning that someone should "take stock of the operations of the entire established fossil fuel industry" INSTEAD.
But it's nice to see where one's preferences and loyalties lie.
Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
Quote from the shitty VICE text:
The scientists say the finding is reason enough to zoom out from fracking, and take stock of the operations of the entire established fossil fuel industry.
And the actual statement from the American Geographical Union article they are quoting:
"The results are indicative that emissions from established fossil fuel harvesting techniques are greater than inventoried," Kort said. "There's been so much attention on high-volume hydraulic fracturing, but we need to consider the industry as a whole."
Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
For speakers of Commonwealth English ...
So just English then? (i.e., pronouncing things properly, like the last letter of the alphabet as "zed", and spelling colour correctly)
looks like an oil refinary is in the middle of it: https://www.google.com/maps/@36.9700225,-108.166424,919m/data=!3m1!1e3
My Uncle Tony moved to Phoenix two years ago. I'm just saying.
You are welcome on my lawn.
We didn't focus on it because we weren't sure if it was a true signal or an instrument error,
That is not very smart, Such a huge discrepancy from expected value no matter what the reason should be the first thing to focus on. What use were your other measurements if you weren't even sure if the 2500km spot was instrument error or real thing.
The primary effect of fracking is the lower price of fossil fuels.
I thought the primary effect of fracking was contaminated groundwater and aquifers...
Is it George Clooney's smug floating around the southwest?
no, the primary effect of fracking was russian propaganda against it all over the net
What's the other hotspot on the West coast close to LA?
"If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
Preferably in a peer reviewed journal that is not funded by the energy industry. You know, some organization that is actually credible, rather then being a bunch of paid shills.
I'm not entirely sure such an entity exists any longer. In any branch of science.
coal, naturally occurring coal. idiots can't to a damn thing about it either.
Yeah, by all means. Let's cite some honest references from the corrupt and diseased climate change industry. Frack Mother Earth until she groans!
You know she likes it. First the drilling, then the injection . . . oh yeah . . .
I'm sure you are aware of the methane producing power of Mexican food?
For UK and European readers, "the size of Delaware" is just a tad more than a fourth of "the size of Wales".
That exchange rate keeps plummeting. When I was a kid, you could get two Wales for a Delaware.
Someone light a match!
KABOOOM!
Problem solved.
Maybe a local storage facility, but there ain't a damn thing there other than barrels to indicate that it's a refinery.
"Now, I doubt any of you would prefer a rolled up newspaper as a weapon against a dictator or a criminal intruder."
You know, people, comparisons like "Delaware-sized", or "the size of Montana" don't mean much to the rest of the world... ;)
This is just Gaia naturally trying to clear up a nasty infestation of Homo Sapiens and return to a normal equilibrium. Nothing to be alarmed about here.
the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
Like a photo flare or photo of a smoke cloud, this is a single time event sample as far as I can tell. Was there an industrial or transportation accident? Many tests for hydrocarbons are cross sensitive, such as a sensor for Propane will detect gasoline, natural gas, butane, etc. What sensor is used, what is the sample time, what else is it sensitive to, and were there any significant accidents or releases in the area recently? If it was from the soil, soil based sampling should have seen this concentration long ago in gas exploration.
The truth shall set you free!
Credibility in this field is shot. Whenever you start rejecting perspectives, you create an orthodoxy which must not be strayed from.
If its due to industry I wonder what they are doing wrong there that they dont do in several dozen other methane production areas around the country. This could eailly point out its some unusual natural cause. It will be scientifically interesting to find out what the cause is.
I have not seen any Whales in Delaware for a long time.
LFTR.
Oh, are we just complaining and preaching here? Then never-mind that answer.
"In God We Trust, All Others Pay Cash"
. . . I didn't think I would ever stop crying.
Now excuse me, while I go change my diaper.
Comment removed based on user account deletion
"We didn't focus on it because we weren't sure if it was a true signal or an instrument error,"
Because they were told not too. They damn well knew their instruments were calibrated right or the data would have been tossed.
This is such bullshit and just goes to show you how much control the fossil fuel industries really have over the world. If you don't think there aren't crazy old scrooges with their fingers on assassins harassing scientists, government officials and powerful businessmen and dictators and tryants alike.
You're a fucking moron.
Does everyone get directly assassinated that goes up against these bastards? Nope. But indirectly enough pressure is put on the whole pyramid scheme of society to kill any innovation down low at the base and to keep the top tightly controlled. And trust me the tools of terror these assholes use aren't simply assasins. It's just a blank generalization of the situation.
We have long wondered how much leakage there is in the natural gas distribution system. It doesn'the take much to destroy the greenhouse benefits of natural gas. I'm glad to see numbers that aren'the provided by the Koch brothers.
Okay who farted?
Are you really comparing water spend on something so wasteful like farming to something which we need to sustain life, like fracking? wait....
Maybe it's just another Pacific Gas and Electric pipeline.
This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
Observing the huge size of the methane cloud the researcher tried to lite his cigarette. Problem solved.
I'm not a smurf.
It is, as usual, all about you, dude.
And your partiality towards seeing things that are not there.
Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens