Slashdot Mirror


Core Secrets: NSA Saboteurs In China and Germany

Advocatus Diaboli writes with this snippet from The Intercept: The National Security Agency has had agents in China, Germany, and South Korea working on programs that use "physical subversion" to infiltrate and compromise networks and devices, according to documents obtained by The Intercept. The documents, leaked by NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden, also indicate that the agency has used under cover operatives to gain access to sensitive data and systems in the global communications industry, and that these secret agents may have even dealt with American firms. The documents describe a range of clandestine field activities that are among the agency's "core secrets" when it comes to computer network attacks, details of which are apparently shared with only a small number of officials outside the NSA.

13 of 228 comments (clear)

  1. They really need to pardon Snowden... by Karmashock · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... so he'll not feel inspired to keep leaking.

    I'm all for the leaks when it concerns stuff the NSA does against civilians. But against foreign governments? The point of the NSA is to do that sort of thing. And anyone that thinks these other governments aren't doing the same thing back are kidding themselves. The US is just walking around with their fly down until they get Snowden home. And he can be brought back at any time for the low low price of just pardoning him. Do that, admit fault, have a national/international discussion about it, and then as part of that he stops.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by dbIII · · Score: 4, Insightful

      With respect - Snowden dumped the documents with journalists so "The US is just walking around with their fly down until they get Snowden home" doesn't apply. The fly is down until there's nothing left in the pile worth releasing as news whether anything happens with Snowden or not.

  2. Pardons are for the guilty. by jcr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Snowden is a whistleblower. He deserves our thanks, and an apology from everyone who's demanded that he be prosecuted.

    Using classification to cover up billions of felonies is something the American people should never tolerate again.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:Pardons are for the guilty. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Exactly. He needs to keep his leaks to what the NSA does wrong... not what they do right.

      1. If the government doesn't want broad unofficial leaks, then they should have a functional and safe channel for internal whistleblowing.
      2. Snowden offered the NSA a chance to vet the material. They refused. So it is silly to now complain that it wasn't vetted.
      3. Loyalty is a two way street. Citizens should be loyal to their country. But countries should also be loyal to their citizens.

  3. Does look like they need adult supervision by dbIII · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Does look like they need adult supervision - sentry hawk, owl, raven etc it's so fucking comic book that you wonder if they spend all their time dreaming up James Bond plot lines instead of actually getting some work down. Get rid of these toy soldiers and replace them with real ones.

  4. You don't know what a traitor is, asshole. by jcr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The traitors are all the apparatchiki who routinely violate their oath to the constitution by violating the fourth amendment on a routine basis. Snowden was the only man at the NSA who did his duty.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  5. Re: the guy is a traitor, and so are the reporters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My first instinct was to reply to you with a dismissive expletive - thus having shown in my reply as much critical thought as you did in your post.

    But I realized that I too once came from the Stephan Decatur school, and should be gentle with a previous self. You see, as one grows older and the rose colored glasses begin to loose their tint, one realizes that one may be patriotic AND critical simultaneously. Couple that with the growing realization that the country which we love has almost certainly committed crimes against her own people, and it becomes a moral imperative for her citizens to wake from their stupor and attempt to regain the power over government and basic human freedoms so eloquently elucidated in our Constitution.

    Did Snowden break the law? Certainly. Was the law Constitutional? Not if the Executive Orders were being used to shield malfeasance (and despite Tricky Dick's assert actions, simply because a President does it does not MAKE it legal). Should you, as a responsible citizen you loves his country stop to think on his own for once instead of making a knee jerk assessment? For the sake of the Republic, I hope so,

  6. Re:well duh by krigat · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Rethink what you are saying. "It's against the constiution, but it's their job, so it's OK."

    So if, let's say, a hired assassin would kill someone from you family, would you say "well, it's against the law, but it was his job, so it's OK"? I doubt it...

    If the NSA's job is to sabotage allies, then they've a wrong job. Period.

  7. While I will agree with that.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Physical subversion of foreign intelligence assets is CIA territory, not NSA. While that certainly IS a way to perform Signal Interception, I'm cautiously optimistic that is outside the scope of their charter.

    There's a reason these powers were supposed to have been segregated between multiple branches of the government/military and not just consolidated all under one roof. One of those reasons was accountability to their constituents, the other being so they couldn't use this to subvert the rule of law.

    Now that neither is true, we need to look long and hard at what steps to take to suitable resolve this dilemma while not letting outside forces dominate our internal and international landscapes.

    1. Re:While I will agree with that.... by hey! · · Score: 3, Interesting

      SIGINT is the NSA's bailiwick and nothing in the mission statement of the NSA precludes using physical intrusion to obtain it.

      What's more NSA is part of the DoD, and the DoD has been conducting physical intrusion to obtain SIGINT for years. In the Cold War American subs tapped undersea cables believed by the Soviets to be impervious. That was a joint NSA, Navy, CIA program, which makes sense.

      It also makes sense that physical intrusion to obtain SIGINT would be a joint NSA/CIA operation, which means that someone with access to the NSA family jewels can also compromise CIA "assets" overseas.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  8. Re:well duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Actually it is insulting and horrifying when these tactics are used against foreign nations considered to be allies.

    Not only does it do that but it also isolates the USA from the rest of the world, it is not without reason that we Europeans look bleakly on the US and have a feeling of distrust while as allies we should have a different outlook.

    The same goes for this when corporations are concerned, corporate espionage especially when done by a government agency is just plain wrong.

  9. Re:well duh by Skarjak · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Precisely. I am appalled by the number of Americans in this discussion who seem to think this is fine. I can understand doing this to China cause they're pretty brazen about their espionage, but Germany? Added to the leaks about the surveyance of the Chancellor, this clearly shows the profound lack of trust the Americans have in their allies. With friends like that, who needs enemies?

  10. Re:Snowden by TubeSteak · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Am I the only one that is still wondering why these "snowden leaks" are still coming out in the way that they are?

    Yes.

    The rest of us remember the wikileaks document dump and how important stories got did not get appropriate attention because of the sheer volume that was getting reported at once.

    Another (perhaps unintended) aspect of the continuous reporting is that almost every time a denial is issued, the NSA is subsequently revealed as lying to the public and Congress.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!