Slashdot Mirror


Core Secrets: NSA Saboteurs In China and Germany

Advocatus Diaboli writes with this snippet from The Intercept: The National Security Agency has had agents in China, Germany, and South Korea working on programs that use "physical subversion" to infiltrate and compromise networks and devices, according to documents obtained by The Intercept. The documents, leaked by NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden, also indicate that the agency has used under cover operatives to gain access to sensitive data and systems in the global communications industry, and that these secret agents may have even dealt with American firms. The documents describe a range of clandestine field activities that are among the agency's "core secrets" when it comes to computer network attacks, details of which are apparently shared with only a small number of officials outside the NSA.

32 of 228 comments (clear)

  1. They really need to pardon Snowden... by Karmashock · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... so he'll not feel inspired to keep leaking.

    I'm all for the leaks when it concerns stuff the NSA does against civilians. But against foreign governments? The point of the NSA is to do that sort of thing. And anyone that thinks these other governments aren't doing the same thing back are kidding themselves. The US is just walking around with their fly down until they get Snowden home. And he can be brought back at any time for the low low price of just pardoning him. Do that, admit fault, have a national/international discussion about it, and then as part of that he stops.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by dbIII · · Score: 4, Insightful

      With respect - Snowden dumped the documents with journalists so "The US is just walking around with their fly down until they get Snowden home" doesn't apply. The fly is down until there's nothing left in the pile worth releasing as news whether anything happens with Snowden or not.

    2. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by CanEHdian · · Score: 2

      But foreigners themselves are loving this stuff, as they can use this against their own governments, often "sharing" (actually: just handing it over, but that paints too much a picture the actual situation) intercepted data with the NSA. Did you hear any arrest warrants being issued against UK citizens by Belgian authorities regarding the Belgacom hack by GCHQ? What DID the Belgian government/intelligence services know?

      I say it's time to pull their pants down. You won't see any balls, but you will see how they soiled themselves, and where they wiped themselves with their citizens' rights to privacy.

      --
      When the copyright term is "forever minus a day", live every day like it's the last.
    3. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Charliemopps · · Score: 2

      ... so he'll not feel inspired to keep leaking.

      I'm all for the leaks when it concerns stuff the NSA does against civilians. But against foreign governments? The point of the NSA is to do that sort of thing. And anyone that thinks these other governments aren't doing the same thing back are kidding themselves. The US is just walking around with their fly down until they get Snowden home. And he can be brought back at any time for the low low price of just pardoning him. Do that, admit fault, have a national/international discussion about it, and then as part of that he stops.

      Because 2 wrongs make a right? Is that how it goes?

      We're talking about deliberate sabotage of our allies telecommunications networks. It'd be one thing if this were with countries we're at war with, but it's not.

    4. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Karmashock · · Score: 2

      I guess my real point wasn't clear. I don't expect countries to sign such an agreement.

      I expect them to be forced to admit that they want to retain the ability to spy by refusing to sign it.

      And as such we get past this absurd holier then thou phase of the discussion where nations pretend that OF COURSE THEY don't spy on allies. Which is of course either wrong or a lie depending on whether the person saying that knows better.

      once we all admit that we want to retain teh ability to spy we can talk about what limits we want to put on each other as regards such things.

      If the europeans want the US to do X Y and Z... then naturally the US can require the same in turn. And oh by the way, if they get really obnoxious on the point the US can just stop sharing its intel with allies that it feels are being uncooperative.

      We have a good bargaining position if we can just get these people off their soap box for two seconds.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    5. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by jopsen · · Score: 2

      We're talking about deliberate sabotage of our allies telecommunications networks. It'd be one thing if this were with countries we're at war with, but it's not.

      Thank you!

      Because 2 wrongs make a right? Is that how it goes?

      But let's not kid our selves... Most countries don't have offensive intelligence capabilities.
      Just because the US intelligence community has a history of murdering and selling drugs to fund illegal wars, doesn't mean other civilized countries do...

    6. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by dbIII · · Score: 2

      Snowden isn't sitting in Russia handing out press releases. This stuff was dropped off a long time ago.

  2. Pardons are for the guilty. by jcr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Snowden is a whistleblower. He deserves our thanks, and an apology from everyone who's demanded that he be prosecuted.

    Using classification to cover up billions of felonies is something the American people should never tolerate again.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:Pardons are for the guilty. by ebno-10db · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Snowden is a whistleblower. He deserves our thanks, and an apology from everyone who's demanded that he be prosecuted.

      I agree, but now he's gone too far. The crimes were spying on the American people without warrants. But this sort of interception of information is exactly what the NSA is supposed to do. There has never been any secret about that, and I support it as useful intelligence. If Snowden keeps this up, he's going to alienate his supporters, or at the very least give a lot of ammo to his detractors.

    2. Re:Pardons are for the guilty. by Karmashock · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly. He needs to keep his leaks to what the NSA does wrong... not what they do right.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    3. Re:Pardons are for the guilty. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Exactly. He needs to keep his leaks to what the NSA does wrong... not what they do right.

      1. If the government doesn't want broad unofficial leaks, then they should have a functional and safe channel for internal whistleblowing.
      2. Snowden offered the NSA a chance to vet the material. They refused. So it is silly to now complain that it wasn't vetted.
      3. Loyalty is a two way street. Citizens should be loyal to their country. But countries should also be loyal to their citizens.

    4. Re:Pardons are for the guilty. by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

      Snowden is on record stating that the only reason he took the NSA job was to steal top secret information. Snowden has yet to produce any actual evidence that he even tried to use the internal process. There have been reports that NSA can't find records of him doing so. You would think that since he managed to steal 1.7 million documents he might have managed a copy of an email or two.... funny that he didn't get anything to bolster his case. So much for Snowden and your first point.

      Exposing foreign intelligence operations harms American national security. That takes Snowden out of the realm of "whistleblowing" if he was ever in it.

      Snowden has demonstrated the opposite of loyalty to the US and its people. Snowden rejects and undermines the process of representative government. If the Constitution permits something he doesn't like he simply ignores it. Snowden is acting like an anti-democratic vigilante, trying to impose his view of the world and how it should be on all of us as he continues to damage America and aid its enemies.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  3. Does look like they need adult supervision by dbIII · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Does look like they need adult supervision - sentry hawk, owl, raven etc it's so fucking comic book that you wonder if they spend all their time dreaming up James Bond plot lines instead of actually getting some work down. Get rid of these toy soldiers and replace them with real ones.

  4. You don't know what a traitor is, asshole. by jcr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The traitors are all the apparatchiki who routinely violate their oath to the constitution by violating the fourth amendment on a routine basis. Snowden was the only man at the NSA who did his duty.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  5. well duh by thesazi · · Score: 2, Informative

    Isn't this EXACTLY what the NSA's job is?

    1. Re:well duh by krigat · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Rethink what you are saying. "It's against the constiution, but it's their job, so it's OK."

      So if, let's say, a hired assassin would kill someone from you family, would you say "well, it's against the law, but it was his job, so it's OK"? I doubt it...

      If the NSA's job is to sabotage allies, then they've a wrong job. Period.

    2. Re:well duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually it is insulting and horrifying when these tactics are used against foreign nations considered to be allies.

      Not only does it do that but it also isolates the USA from the rest of the world, it is not without reason that we Europeans look bleakly on the US and have a feeling of distrust while as allies we should have a different outlook.

      The same goes for this when corporations are concerned, corporate espionage especially when done by a government agency is just plain wrong.

    3. Re:well duh by Skarjak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Precisely. I am appalled by the number of Americans in this discussion who seem to think this is fine. I can understand doing this to China cause they're pretty brazen about their espionage, but Germany? Added to the leaks about the surveyance of the Chancellor, this clearly shows the profound lack of trust the Americans have in their allies. With friends like that, who needs enemies?

  6. Not Snowden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Snowden doesn't leak these reports anymore. He doesn't even have access to the files. It's all reporters doing it now.

  7. Re: the guy is a traitor, and so are the reporters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My first instinct was to reply to you with a dismissive expletive - thus having shown in my reply as much critical thought as you did in your post.

    But I realized that I too once came from the Stephan Decatur school, and should be gentle with a previous self. You see, as one grows older and the rose colored glasses begin to loose their tint, one realizes that one may be patriotic AND critical simultaneously. Couple that with the growing realization that the country which we love has almost certainly committed crimes against her own people, and it becomes a moral imperative for her citizens to wake from their stupor and attempt to regain the power over government and basic human freedoms so eloquently elucidated in our Constitution.

    Did Snowden break the law? Certainly. Was the law Constitutional? Not if the Executive Orders were being used to shield malfeasance (and despite Tricky Dick's assert actions, simply because a President does it does not MAKE it legal). Should you, as a responsible citizen you loves his country stop to think on his own for once instead of making a knee jerk assessment? For the sake of the Republic, I hope so,

  8. Re:the guy is a traitor, and so are the reporters. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What is the point of US citizenship if there is no difference in treatment? If US citizenship is nearly unique in that there is a tax liability for income earned anywhere in the universe based on that nexus of citizenship, it BETTER be worth something like immunity from NSA spying.

  9. While I will agree with that.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Physical subversion of foreign intelligence assets is CIA territory, not NSA. While that certainly IS a way to perform Signal Interception, I'm cautiously optimistic that is outside the scope of their charter.

    There's a reason these powers were supposed to have been segregated between multiple branches of the government/military and not just consolidated all under one roof. One of those reasons was accountability to their constituents, the other being so they couldn't use this to subvert the rule of law.

    Now that neither is true, we need to look long and hard at what steps to take to suitable resolve this dilemma while not letting outside forces dominate our internal and international landscapes.

    1. Re:While I will agree with that.... by hey! · · Score: 3, Interesting

      SIGINT is the NSA's bailiwick and nothing in the mission statement of the NSA precludes using physical intrusion to obtain it.

      What's more NSA is part of the DoD, and the DoD has been conducting physical intrusion to obtain SIGINT for years. In the Cold War American subs tapped undersea cables believed by the Soviets to be impervious. That was a joint NSA, Navy, CIA program, which makes sense.

      It also makes sense that physical intrusion to obtain SIGINT would be a joint NSA/CIA operation, which means that someone with access to the NSA family jewels can also compromise CIA "assets" overseas.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  10. Saboteurs? More like daily bread and butter by Trachman · · Score: 2

    This is a classic way technical intelligence specialists operate. Lets analyze practical example: the target is a database. The potential attack vectors are following (but obviously not limited to): a)compromised hardware which allows to download data from the server b) compromised software which allows to download data from the server c) compromised specialist (s) which download the data d) intercepted communications,

    Rule #1: any gathered data is verified by comparing it to independent source. Rule #2: the sources cannot know about each other. Only if these two rules are met the data can be considered as data which has passed basic verification. "Physical subversion", "blackmail", "infiltration" are day to day activities, the bread and butter, for all those agencies.

  11. Re:what do you expect? by Livius · · Score: 2

    You're saying the US does not treat its friends any better than it treats its (sometimes imaginary) enemies.

    Interestingly, the US's friends have also noticed this.

  12. Snowden by BringsApples · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Here goes me getting modded into slashdot hell...

    Am I the only one that is still wondering why these "snowden leaks" are still coming out in the way that they are? I mean, are we all going to be sitting around 30 years from now, still hearing about these leaks?

    The year is 2045: Snowden leaks - The NSA has been watching all of you guys' teleport activity since the early 1980's! They used physical hardware hacks that you could have never known about... and they're doing it to foreign countries too!

    Seriously, it all seems like the information that we're getting is being spooled in a prefabricated way, as to serve the fear propaganda more so than it should. I'm just waiting for the "NSA actually created the universe" leak.

    --
    Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    1. Re:Snowden by Luckyo · · Score: 2

      Snowden didn't have any material for about a year now. He surrendered everything before accepting asylum in Russia, as that was one of their terms for offering him asylum. It's all in hands of journalists now.

      Staggered release is done so that problem stays on the news, and people don't forget that his problem persists.

    2. Re:Snowden by TubeSteak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Am I the only one that is still wondering why these "snowden leaks" are still coming out in the way that they are?

      Yes.

      The rest of us remember the wikileaks document dump and how important stories got did not get appropriate attention because of the sheer volume that was getting reported at once.

      Another (perhaps unintended) aspect of the continuous reporting is that almost every time a denial is issued, the NSA is subsequently revealed as lying to the public and Congress.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
  13. Both a whistleblower and a traitor ... by drnb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Most of you have it wrong. Its not is he a whistleblower or is he a traitor? Is the situation white or black? The simple truth is that he is now beyond debate **both** a whistleblower and a traitor. The two are not mutually exclusive. The whistleblower actions do not negate the traitorous actions.

    Revealing mass surveillance of US citizens is obviously whistleblowing.

    However revealing clandestine cyber operations against China, a country that routinely conduct cyber espionage against US commercial, governmental and military computers, is traitorous.

    Plus it makes it more difficult to blow off as a coincidence the fact that he revealed the mass surveillance just as President Obama was about to publicly criticize China for cyber espionage actions against the US; and he fled to China for sanctuary and protection - something that would come with a price tag given the diplomatic heat China would take. These facts are a bit less tin-foil-hat than there were previously.

    We are now seeing how Snowden paid the rent in China and Russia.

  14. our american friends by Tom · · Score: 2

    I'm from Germany. Ever since it was leaked that the NSA was spying so extensively on our government that by international standards it could reasonably be considered an act of war, I wonder what it'll take for our USA-lapdog chancellor to grow a spine and do more than giving Obama a stern talk.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    1. Re:our american friends by echnaton192 · · Score: 2

      Spying on the Government is one thing. But this is mass surveillance. Every system in our countries might be compromised. Every router might be sending the information to the NSA. How to flash a fritzbox so that everyting is deleted? How could this be done with a mandatory router from the ISP?

      The Chilling Effect is the problem here. Every second of every day is recorded and our Government conspires with the NSA to get the job (mass surveillance) done.

      Spying on our Government is bad enough, but it does not effect NGOs, citizens and the the freedom of the press or the privcacy of 80 million people.

      But these leak prove that there is no limit to our "allies" - and to our lapdog government. Mister Steinmeier is a Collaborator. And the US seem to be the enemy he is collaborating with.

  15. Re:Very nice $hill. by Karmashock · · Score: 2

    You say that from which country's perspective? It helps me understand where you are coming from.

    As to the American control complex... it is because we are responsible for global peace. Your country isn't.

    We are a super power. We have responsibilities. If we drop the ball, billions might die. We have more responsibility every day then your culture has probably had in the last thousand years combined.

    Dare to contest me. You might not like how irrelevant you are or how important the US is... and it is a problem because we're human just like everyone else and we make mistakes.

    But that doesn't mean we're not the people that keep things calm enough for people to live. We keep international trade flowing. We back the international treaties that maintain world peace. We control nuclear arms. We control biological weapons. We control chemical weapons. We deny expansionist powers the ability to claim territory simply with force of arms. We forge peace and we build nations.

    Are we perfect? Hardly... we're people just like everyone else. But we are far more powerful then you and with that power comes responsibility. And with that responsibility comes the right to use it.

    I don't like it either. I really don't. I'd just assume retreat all US forces back to our country and let the world take care of its own problems. But we tried that after WW1 and what happened? The europeans were killing each other almost immediately. And it has only been through US military force that europe has remained peaceful. The europeans basically don't even have militaries now and they is because we protect them. And in protecting them we have restrained their old imperialist ambitions. And through that we have prevented them from killing each other again.

    Think about it.

    Did the US start or cause WW1?

    Nope.

    Did we start WW2?

    Nope.

    Did we start the cold war? Nope.

    What wars did we start? Second Iraq war possibly though that is debatable. Short of that... none of them.

    And you presume to judge us. Which country do you represent?

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.