Slashdot Mirror


Technology Heats Up the Adultery Arms Race

HughPickens.com writes: Michelle Cottle reports in The Atlantic that today, spouses have easy access to an array of sophisticated spy software that record every keystroke; compile detailed logs of calls, texts, and video chats; that track a phone's location in real time; recover deleted messages from all manner of devices (without having to touch said devices); and that turn phones into wiretapping equipment. One might assume that the proliferation of such spyware would have a chilling effect on extramarital activities. But according to Cottle, aspiring cheaters need not despair: software developers are also rolling out ever stealthier technology to help people conceal their affairs. Right or wrong, cheating apps tap into a potentially lucrative market and researchers regard the Internet as fertile ground for female infidelity in particular. "Men tend to cheat for physical reasons and women for emotional reasons," says Katherine Hertlein. "The Internet facilitates a lot of emotional disclosure and connections with someone else."

But virtual surveillance has its risks. Stumbling across an incriminating email your partner left open is one thing; premeditated spying can land you in court. A Minnesota man named Danny Lee Hormann, suspecting his wife of infidelity, installed a GPS tracker on her car and allegedly downloaded spyware onto her phone and the family computer. In March 2010, Hormann's wife had a mechanic search her car and found the tracker. She called the police, and Hormann spent a month in jail on stalking charges. "I always tell people two things: (1) do it legally, and (2) do it right," says John Paul Lucich, a computer-forensics expert and the author of Cyber Lies, a do-it-yourself guide for spouses looking to become virtual sleuths. Lucich has worked his share of ugly divorces, and he stresses that even the most damning digital evidence of infidelity will prove worthless in court — and potentially land you in trouble — if improperly gathered. His blanket advice: Get a really good lawyer.

13 of 304 comments (clear)

  1. Already gone by kilfarsnar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you feel the need to use these tools, your relationship is already in trouble.

    --
    "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    1. Re:Already gone by Immerman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unrelated. In this case we're not talking about the application of tools, we're talking about trust - which is widely considered to the THE most important factor in any healthy relationship. So lets try this on for size:

      "If you feel you can't trust the person you've chosen to be your life partner, your relationship already has serious issues"

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    2. Re:Already gone by The+Ickle+Jones · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How in the world is it even possible to "stalk" your spouse???

      Do you also think it's not possible to rape your spouse? Following someone around all the time or tracking them without their consent seems like a pretty clear-cut case of stalking to me, regardless of whether you're married or not.

    3. Re:Already gone by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When my wife refers to me, she sometimes says 'my husband' , or 'my man'. I sometimes refer to my wife as "my wife".

      Maybe there are people that need to quit trying to form complete characterizations of people based on the use of a common phrase.

    4. Re:Already gone by pla · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Do you also think it's not possible to rape your spouse?

      So, when did you stop beating your wife?

      Ahem.

      The law doesn't distinguish between the two "owners" of shared marital assets. How, therefore, can it count as "stalking" to install a GPS tracker - Which have a plethora of entirely legitimate uses - in my own cars? By the same reasoning, does it also count as "stalking" to take advantage of all the insurance companies' offers to track your kids' driving habits with similar devices?

      As for email, I maintain our home network. By the same weasel-logic corporations use to spy on their employees' emails, if I "just happen" to come across a damning email in the course of a routine security audit of my home IT infrastructure, how exactly does that count as unkosher?

      Now, I wouldn't do any of that, because I trust my SO. I still, though, have an awfully hard time understanding how a court can draw arbitrary lines between "allowed" and "illegal" based on something they can't physically know - My intent.

    5. Re:Already gone by raymorris · · Score: 4, Insightful

      GP didn't say there's no such thing as raping ones spouse. In fact, GP said "I'm sure it happens". Followed by "but it seems harder to prove".

      Similarly, if I'm asleep and my wife wants to wake me up in a special way, that's fine (that's awesome, actually). If she did the same thing to sleeping stranger, that would be rape / sexual assault. The difference being that when I married her, I essentially consented generally, switching it from "default no-consent" to "default consent", meaning she's free to touch me until I indicate that I don't want her to.

      If I walk up behind a random woman at Walmart and wrap my arms around her, with my hands on her breasts, that's called sexual assault. If I do the exact same motion with my wife, that's called "good morning". The difference being that my wife consented in a general way, announcing to me and to the rest of the world that she _wanted_ to do "what married people do" with me. Obviously if she tells me "I'm in a bad mood, please leave me alone for a bit", I should honor that.

    6. Re:Already gone by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The law doesn't distinguish between the two "owners" of shared marital assets. How, therefore, can it count as "stalking" to install a GPS tracker

      Assets are not automatically "marital". I live in California, a community property state. We share most assets, but I own my car, and my wife owns hers, and the titles of each clearly state that we are sole owners. Furthermore, you don't automatically have a right to violate someone's rights just because they are using your property. I don't have a right to record your phone calls just because you are using my phone.

    7. Re:Already gone by ultranova · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So, are you saying that it's OK to rape and beat your wife as long as you don't leave marks?

      And absent signs of physical trauma, you won't believe it happened?

      Absent signs of physical trauma, do you have any kind of evidence it happened? If not, why would you automatically believe a person has committed a heinous crime just on another person's word? Malice is equal opportunity.

      Violence leaves marks that can be examined, but it's not in general possible to determine afterwards whether someone consented or not. It's bat that a criminal might walk free, but it's also bad that an innocent might not. If you have a solution to this situation, do feel free to share.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  2. Telling quote by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 5, Insightful

    aspiring cheaters need not despair:

    I know this is meant tongue-in-cheek, but if taken at face value it's completely wrong. I've been married for about 20 years. I think the pleasures of being married to my wife this long, and of her being able to trust me, and of not having betrayed my family, far outweigh any benefit I would have gotten from succumbing to the temptation to cheat.

    So aspiring cheaters should actually despair that some technology increases their temptation to cheat. In my estimation, they're just being more tempted to make a mistake.

    1. Re:Telling quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I've cheated many years ago. It felt great for the half hour or so of actual sex. Immediately after I felt nothing but shame and despair. It really wasn't worth the feeling of being a lying piece of shit. Even now almost 30 years later I occasionally think back on it and hate that it happened. There's nothing like sitting there while your wife talks about what a great husband you've been with that scene replaying itself in your mind. I'd give anything to erease that.

    2. Re:Telling quote by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm really sorry. I guess you can take some small comfort that your moral compass seems to be working well, and that you've been a good enough husband otherwise that she appreciates you.

  3. My woman by Immerman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Read a lot into things? I'll admit cayenne's usage was borderline, but when I talk about "my woman" I don't mean "the woman I own" I mean "the woman I'm pairing with", as opposed to the 3.5+ billion women in the world whose happiness and well-being have negligible impact on my life. She is my woman, I'm her man, no power imbalance implied. How would *you* phrase that? After all we're not married, and I'm not in the habit of referring to grown women as girls.

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  4. Overturned on appeal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2011/10/27/scary-stalker-husband-in-the-legal-clear-to-track-wifes-car/