Slashdot Mirror


An Algorithm to End the Lines for Ice at Burning Man

Any gathering of 65,000 people in the desert is going to require some major infrastructure to maintain health and sanity. At Burning Man, some of that infrastructure is devoted to a supply chain for ice. Writes Bennett Haselton, The lines for ice bags at Burning Man could be cut from an hour long at peak times, to about five minutes, by making one small... Well, read the description below of how they do things now, and see if the same suggested change occurs to you. I'm curious whether it's the kind of idea that is more obvious to students of computer science who think algorithmically, or if it's something that could occur to anyone. Read on for the rest; Bennett's idea for better triage may bring to mind a lot of other queuing situations and ways that time spent waiting in line could be more efficiently employed.

I skipped burning man this year but went for the first time in 2013. One of the only goods for sale at Burning Man is bags of ice -- to keep your own food cool, or simply to refresh yourself, you can line up to buy bags of ice that are sold by Arctica camp out of the back of a refrigerated truck under a tent. Bags cost $3 apiece.

During peak times last year, the lines were up to an hour long. This year, so I heard, the lines on the first day were even worse, because two of the three distribution points were unable to open due to closed roads, so everybody lined up at the only sales tent that was operating.

Regardless of the conditions, the procedure when you get to the front of the line is the same. You specify how many bags of ice you want, and deposit cash in a container on the counter. Then a volunteer walks back to the ice truck to fetch one or more bags from the truck and brings them back to the counter. You collect your bags and continue on your way.

OK, before reading any further -- based on what I just wrote, can you think of a way to speed up the line? No cheating -- read the preceding paragraph and think of what you might do differently. Spoilers follow!

The thought that occurred to me almost immediately after I got my bag of ice, was: Why not just have the volunteers carry the bags of ice from the truck to the counter, before people place their order? As long as the line is moving, no bag of ice would sit on the counter long enough to melt. And then each transaction at the front of the line would be reduced to: Customer pays for bag(s), customer picks up bag(s) and leaves. By eliminating the time to walk back to the truck and fetch the bag(s), the system would significantly reduce the per-customer transaction time.

I'd asked a handful of Burning Man veterans about this, and they said that Arctica had tried this at one point, but was required to stop by Nevada health code regulations, which treated ice as a "food product" and therefore said that it could not be moved out onto the counter until an order has been placed. This sounded puzzling to me -- don't cafés place other "food products" out on a counter all the time, where they can be bought and picked up by customers? And for the ice bags, why would it matter in practice anyway -- even if the state of Nevada is worried about germs starting to multiply as soon as the bag is removed from the refrigerated truck, the time the bag spends sitting on the counter is still negligible compared to the time the customer spends transporting it back to their own camp.

So I emailed the Nevada State Health Division to ask them what the regulations actually said, and if they would allow the ice vendors to load bags of ice onto their sales counter before they had been paid for by a customer. One of their Public Health Engineers replied and said, "I can assure you that we do not require the ice to remain in the truck until it is ordered" (and dryly added, "It is common for vendors to blame the health authority for imagined regulations"). Regarding the resulting long lines, he also advised me, in the spirit of Burning Man radical self-reliance (if not practicality), "You may consider bringing your own ice to the Playa rather than purchasing it from them."

So that's it. There's no regulatory reason why the ice can't be brought to the sales counter before it's paid for -- where it wouldn't even have time to start melting, if there are customers eagerly waiting to carry it away -- and no reason why the line couldn't probably move 5 to 10 times faster as a result. (I emailed Arctica to ask if they would start having volunteers bring ice bags up to the counter before customers place their orders, and showed them the email from the Nevada Health Division saying it would be legal. I received a very friendly reply, mostly asking me who I was and why I was concerned about the issue; I said I had no stake in the matter except hoping to reduce the wait times and hence the aggravation and health risks for people waiting in line in the sun. I have not received a reply to any subsequent inquiries after that.)

In a previous article I'd theorized about an algorithm for speeding up the vehicle exodus at Burning Man. (Basically, have a "priority lane" where cars can exit at different times of day, depending on the last character on their license plate. So one hour where the priority lane is set aside for cars whose license plates end in "A", another hour where the lane is used by cars with plates ending in "B", and so on. This means that drivers who want to use the priority lane, can just wait for the designated hour, instead of spending five hours queueing up to leave.) That was intended more of an intellectual exercise, as a jumping-off point for a discussion about which algorithms would work best under different theoretical assumptions, and with only the small possibility that it might ever actually be implemented at the real event.

The call to speed up the ice lines is not an intellectual exercise. Unless there's a non-obvious major problem with making this change, this is something that could be done the very next year, and would save people thousands of person-hours waiting in line in the sun.

My other suggestion would be to have a "turbo" line even faster than the main one, designed for people to complete each sales transaction in seconds. Every customer in the "turbo" line would be required to have exact change (or be willing to overpay and let the vendor keep the change), and every customer would be required to have their cash fanned out in their hand like playing cards when they got to the front of the line. (A volunteer could walk up and down near the front of the line to verify that people already had their cash displayed properly.) A transaction at the front of the line would simply consist of, "Three dollars -- bag", or, "Six dollars -- two bags", where the customer shows their fanned-out money, dumps it into the cash receptacle, and picks up one or more bags from the counter.

With or without the "turbo" line, at first it might seem like it would take extra labor to keep a supply of ice bags moving constantly from the truck to the counter, but that's not the case. For a given number of bags to be sold, every bag has to be moved from the truck, to the counter, exactly one time. So the total amount of labor is always going to be the same, for a fixed number of ice bags. To have a steady supply of ice moving quickly from the truck to the counter, you might need to have more volunteers working at the same time, but that just means that rather than having 5 volunteers with one-hour shifts spaced throughout the day, you'd have those same volunteers working simultaneously to keep the bags moving.

With the lines moving that much more quickly, what if the ice bags run out halfway through the day? Hopefully the vendor can just send the trucks back out to fetch more bags of ice to be brought back in and sold in the afternoon. But even if they can't -- even if, for some reason, the number of ice bags sold per day has to be fixed at X -- you've still done an enormous amount of good by reducing the wait time from 30-45 minutes to 5 minutes. Because you still sell the same number of ice bags, but you've eliminated the pointless deadweight loss of all the time the customers were previously wasting in line.

And if the vendors can bring in more ice whenever their existing stock sells out much faster, that's a win too -- regardless of whether they're selling the ice for profit or just for altruistic motives. If they're selling ice to help people, then selling more ice is better. If they're selling ice for profit, then selling more ice is better, too.

I'm being fairly pedantic here because I want to make it clear that I think that I think there's no counterargument to be made to this, under any combination of reasonable assumptions -- whether the vendors can bring in more ice or whether they're stuck selling a fixed number of bags per day; whether the goal of selling the ice is for altruism or to make a profit. Bring the ice out before it's paid for, shave the transaction time down to the bare minimum of the customer paying money and then grabbing their ice bags, and everyone will be grateful they don't have to wait an hour in the sun.

And if you're an adventurer thinking about going to Burning Man, my tips for making it (slightly) easier include bringing your own cooler (separate from any food storage cooler) so that you can buy a bag of ice each day, dump it in the cooler, and have your own supply of ice water. That's well worth it, whether the wait time in the ice line is five minutes or an hour.

342 comments

  1. Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by SirDrinksAlot · · Score: 5, Informative

    A guy named Agner Erlang solved most of this already, and we can thank the telephone. He took his work on how to figure out the optimal number of trunk lines for a town and used that to model cash register lines. Erlang worked out that one line into many registers is the fastest and most efficient, so if one line backs up but another one moves quickly, people don't bunch up at the register that was slow. You can see this system at work at Walmart of all places, their express checkout section where they tell you what register to go to is based on this model. If there's a bottleneck beyond the register, say the ice truck, then have a second queue where individuals are provided with something like a receipt for them to obtain the ice directly from the truck. This also has the benefit of individuals being able to buy more than one bag of ice and can come back and enter the ice truck queue to fill the remainder of the order later rather than requeue in the register line. Obviously there are risks to that but ultimately the risk would be the consumers. Both of these methods are in use today and even at the same time in some cases, I saw it just last summer at a beer festival. We went through one queue to get beer tokens, and then there were multiple vendors who accepted those tokens for you to redeem it. Then the vendors redeemed their tokens from the festival operators.

    1. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      Trader Joe's does the same thing. One big line, many registers.

      Funny how efficient it is compared to many lines for many registers.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    2. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by hjf · · Score: 1

      Carrefour does this in Argentina. People don't really understand the concept but they're starting to get used to it. Most banks have been doing it for a long time as well.

      "Hyper-efficient" McDonald's and Walmart? Nope.

    3. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by sanosuke001 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, my first thought was "one queue for tokens and another location for pickup using the single-queue-to-multiple-registers". This blog post was more along the lines of, "durr, me like ice, get now" than an actual "algorithm."

      --
      -SaNo
    4. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by Aaden42 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      One supermarket chain around Albany, NY tried implementing the single line system about a year ago. It only lasted a few months before they reverted.

      At least at the grocery store, people disliked feeling corralled like cattle more than they dislike waiting slightly longer in a less efficient line. Might have been the way it was implemented, honestly. It had a rather frenetic feel to it, with the line “leader” guiding people to one of the actual registers with quite a bit of urgency and insistence. I’d guess there was probably some misguided, management-imposed, career-limiting metric system associated with the process such that the employee ultimately paid the price if customers dawdled and brought the throughput numbers down. That translated to a rather jarring mood to the whole thing.

    5. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      I've never accused Walmart of efficiency, and McDonald's did it's motion efficiency studies decades and decades ago, and hasn't kept up the work.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    6. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The post was basically, "use a buffer for the goods." This is a good idea and is how it should work on the other side of the register when only one good is being sold.

    7. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Trader Joe's does the same thing. One big line, many registers."

      Not at all the stores. Don't know why not though.

    8. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trader Joe's does the same thing. One big line, many registers.

      Funny how efficient it is compared to many lines for many registers.

      This is actually how the ice lines work. One big line, 4-5 stations that customers are distributed to.

    9. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm always ticked off when I do NOT get to use a single-queue.

    10. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

      Fry's electronics does this as well. It is about as efficient as it can be.

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    11. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Unless you get in front of an impatient jerk off. Then they want to run in front of you because 'that line is shorter'.

      "what are YOU DOING?!"
      "waiting in line for the next register open up..."
      "WELL thats stupid just pick one and wait there" proceeds to run in front of 4 people.

      I have lost track of the number of times I put up with that and have given up embarrassing them. As now it just pisses me off and I have lost my sense of humor about it.

      About the only time I enjoy going shopping anymore is if they have the one line multi registers setup. Instead of having to play the 'race to the register' game like we are in kindergarten. Unfortunately there has to be a physical queue there too as people are rude as hell and cut in line.

    12. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      In Canada, the Tim Hortons donut shop drive-thrus now have two lanes for ordering. These merge into a single lane and a single window for both payment and pickup.

      I personally can't see how this speeds things up, since ordering is not the bottleneck in the process - it's the filling of orders that takes the most time. Why not have a single lane and two pickup windows? It's bizarre.

    13. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Hannaford on Wolf Road was doing it up until a few months ago. I haven't been there recently to know if they are still doing it.

    14. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for feeding bennett's post acceptance on slashdot.

    15. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

      Many supermarkets in New York City do this, partly because they have limited physical space for people to wait in front of each register. In turn, it allows registers to be packed closer together, potentially meaning more registers at peak time.

    16. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by SirDrinksAlot · · Score: 1

      McDonald's does that here too. I don't understand it either since it doesn't help anything being backwards - many into one. It's opposite to what Erlang worked on.

    17. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      Yeah this is basic Computer Science -- IIRC we studied this in the Operating Systems courses.

      Check-in at the airport does this too.

    18. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      The CEOs must have gone to the same seminar. It's the only reason I can think of. :)

    19. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1
      "I want a mumble mumble mumble and a mumble mumble mumble - no make that mumble mumble mumble ..."
      "Mumble mumble mumble?"
      Morale of the story - get your lazy ass out of the car if you want your "fat food" fast.

      The real reasons for two lines into one:
      1. Once they have your order, they have you. Don't matter how long the queue takes - you're already psychologically invested, stuck in the line. Welcome to the Hotel California fast food queue;
      2. Those awful speaker systems - combined with language barriers in much of Canada - mean that sometimes just getting the order will jam up the line. I think they must buy their speakers from the same company that sells P.A. systems to the Metro.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    20. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by kwiqsilver · · Score: 1

      I thought about the separate line, but there'd be a lot of people who go straight to the ice line, causing backups while the ice salesman explained the setup. And it would create an extra unnecessary step, when lines are short.

      I propose the In-n-Out drive through solution: When lines get long, have a salesman walk down the line taking pre-orders. He takes the cash, and gives the customer a number of ice tokens (it's Nevada, so they should be able to find a local company that can provide high quality casino-style chips that are hard to forge). Then when the customer gets to the head of the line he plops down N tokens and takes N bags of ice away.

    21. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by hackertourist · · Score: 1

      For grocery stores (and other shops where you'd buy a large number of items in one go) the single line is less convenient for the customer.
      I like being able to stack all of my groceries onto the conveyor before the cashier starts processing them. When the cashier gets to my groceries, I can immediately start packing them (in the right order, heavy items first).
      In a single-line system, you're inevitably still unpacking while the cashier processes your item, so they all end up in a mangled heap at the end of the conveyor belt.

    22. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This "two lanes into one" wasn't meant to solve inefficiencies, but merely real estate. The line ups were becoming too long and ended up on the road, blocking traffic in the adjacent lane for cars turning right, as well as a median lane for left-turning traffic into the Tim's parking lot. By doubling up on drive through lanes, it effectively shortened the pre-order traffic lineups.

      But why anyone needs to wait in a 10 minute lineup for awful coffee is beyond me..

    23. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nerds wanting to get through lines faster at Burning Man.... Don't they know there's a practically naked chick rolling on X next to them. Mellow out. Enjoy the experience and hopefully you'll score with a chick who has done enough drugs to consider you.

    24. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So Bennett Haselton is just trying to take credit for other people's work.

      Big surprise there, /. claims to be a news site, but there's no journalism here, just an aggregation of other people's work with bad summaries.

    25. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check-in at airline counters, and the TSA lines are both good examples. However, it is a royal mess when there is a group of people with special privileges who get to skip the entire line (first-class check-in, TSA pre-screening, airline "loyalty" cards that let people skip to the front of the government mandated security checkpoints, etc).

    26. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Its actually a bottleneck on the workers time. Having to wait while someone figures out their order. You also want as much lead time between when people order their food and when people pick up their food. Allowing the next two people in line to order simultaneously pushes the start of order prep time back. //Some drive though places now redirect your driveup to a call center. So your ordering at the sign is handled someone distant from a callcenter which saves the store workers time and allows a central call center manning multiple time zones to better spread out the various lunch/dinner rush hours over a constant cycle.

    27. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do that. It's for two reasons. First is because some asshole with a returns fucks up the whole system. Then the cashier has to call someone over. The second reason is just pick a line. What are you thinking you will save? 2 minutes? Not worth dealing with the return assholes. Pick a line and commit to it. The return assholes then go to the return area.

    28. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by paiute · · Score: 1
      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    29. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know which supermarket chain you're referring too, but the Hannafords near me still use the single line technique. It's the reason I go there instead of the other options.

    30. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      More and more grocery stores in .nl give you a hand scanner with which you scan your groceries as you put them in your bag while you walk through the store. In the end you hand in the scanner and pay the total, and walk out with your bag.

      There wouldn't even be lines at all if they linked the scans directly to your debit card, but ... early days. ;-)

    31. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      believe it or not, in those double wide drivethrus, the orders are actually taken at a call center, not in store. at least the McDonalds are that way

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    32. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      Fast food places near me use a "single line" system. When a spot opens the cashier announces "Can I help the next guest?" or otherwise greet you to let you know they're ready to take your order. No reason why that wouldn't work in a grocery store. I think that chain you were talking about was just doing it wrong.

    33. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by Matheus · · Score: 1

      That method is working fine here for at least one particular grocery store. A large regional grocer named Lund's does this at a number of their stores. Of course the stores they are using it in have a certain dynamic and layout that seems to compliment its use.

      Other than grocery:
      Best Buy uses this method during the Christmas Season and seems to be expanding that to other times of the year when they are busy.
      Local Electronics/Computer shop Microcenter has done this since they opened.
      The bathrooms in our stadiums end up working this way.

      Definitely works well... not sure why others aren't catching on.

    34. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by schlachter · · Score: 2

      I thought they would create a line of ice for lots of parallel processing (pickup), rather than a line of people for single ping processing (pickup)

      Or maybe some predictive processing...hand out ice to people who look like they need it before they get in line. :P

      --
      My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
    35. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by Bartles · · Score: 1

      Culver's?

    36. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck me that's funny. Thanks :)

    37. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They use this system at the mini-supermarkets in the city center in New Zealand, where there's no room for multiple queues. People zone out while they're shuffling slowly forward in the main queue and forget to walk up to a cashier, so it ends up slowing everybody down instead of just everybody in one of the queues. But it still seems faster overall, and they don't need an angry lane conductor person either.

    38. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, do you make me glad to be British.

    39. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Walmarts in my region have many discreet lines to check out. 20 some in the Super Walmart but all are not open when I got to Walmart.
      Bestbuy has a one-queue for multiple registers.
      Gander Mountain has a one-queue for multiple registers but some people still line up behind a specific register and ignore the "wait here for the next open register"-type sign.

    40. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Can they sell 5-6 times as much ice?

      I haven't been, but if there's always a line for the ice, then they can make sure they have enough ice for the entire time by limiting sell rate.

      People will buy less because of the time cost.

      I didn't read the whole article, it just seems strange to me the assumption that the time cost isn't intentional.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    41. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by tibit · · Score: 1

      Buffer is one way of looking at it. Another way is a multiple-issue pipeline.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    42. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by nblender · · Score: 2

      they can pile twice as many vehicles into the very small parking lot in two lines as they could in one line before they start overflowing into traffic... In my town, there are some Timmies locations where they only have room for one line and these regularly overflow into the street blocking a lane during rush hour... People's coffee is more important than keeping traffic moving.

      I drink my coffee at home.

    43. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      morale - what armies have (unless they're French)
      moral - a thing to learn from a story

    44. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Ordering is the bottle neck, AND it increase turn away.

      http://www.qsrmagazine.com/ope...

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    45. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      yes, it sure isn't the money the spend studying logistic, inefficiencies, and how to get more customers in line. nope. CEOs are stupid people who just do what some person at a seminar tells them.

      " It's the only reason I can think of."
      Think harder.

      http://www.qsrmagazine.com/ope...

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    46. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Mine was put the counter next to the truck. About a metre away and a foot lower, then it's almost no effort to lift the bags down.

      P.S. Bennet Haselton is a penanagram of "Beta Satan Hitler".

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    47. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by uncqual · · Score: 1

      There's quite a bit of inefficiency with this system at my (very large) local Fry's when it was very busy. Although with NewEgg et al, I rarely go into a Frys now - I used to go in once every week or two now maybe only go once every few months and rarely when they are busy so my experiences may not reflect current practice well. In this case, they have many registers open and it's quite far from the head of the queue to the registers at the extreme reaches of the large register farm. As a result, when a checker is assigned a register a long way from the head of the queue, they end up waiting several seconds for their next customer to arrive and begin their transaction and that waiting time is wasted labor. Those checkers who are assigned registers closer to the head of the queue keep busier -- I don't know if they rotate to compensate for this or the best checkers are put at registers near the head of the queue or there is some other way to help compensate for this phenomena.

      Also, without a "line coordinator" (who usually stands on a platform so they can see over the heads of customers), there can be several "green lights" on registers and as people self dispatch to these lights, it's often unclear to the next person in line if all the registers with green lights have been "claimed" by customers ahead of them who are walking towards registers and it's also hard to notice when a register light has just changed from red to green. This results in two people arriving at the same register or the person at the head of the line standing there thinking there's no available register when there is. Fortunately, when they are busy, the always seem to have a line coordinator to keep track of all this.

      However, it occurred to me immediately that technology could pretty much solve this problem and eliminate the line dispatcher. At the head of the line, there could be a button (perhaps along with some motion/proximity sensors) which the customer at the head of the line holds down. A screen would display a register number as it becomes available and, perhaps, that register's light could then flash orange or something to make it stand out. When the button is released (and perhaps when sensors note the person at the head of the line has passed beyond the button), the displayed register is considered assigned and the next customer presses the button to get their next assignment. It's a bit complicated, but the average Fry's customer (at least in this area) is probably a little smarter and able to understand such a system than the average Walmart customer.

      There, actually, would probably be no reason for the lights anymore on the registers with this system since each customer is told which register to go to.

      As well, the system could track how long, on the average, it takes between a transaction finishing and the next one starting (presumably longer for those far from the head of the queue) and as hints of transaction completion are evident (payment in full for example) and item count/size are analyzed (for estimating bagging time), the next customer could be dispatched to the register before the prior transaction was actually complete - sometimes this would result in double stacking but the checker could delay the dispatch if they knew there was some reason the current transaction would take longer to complete "post payment" and if double stacking occurred the checker could notice it and with a single button push put the "stacked" customer at the head of the electronic queue and they would get redispatched to the next available nearby register (perhaps only "downstream" if possible to reduce two way traffic). Redispatches would be indicated on a small screen at each register and would only be done once a target register is immediately available (i.e., no speculative dispatch so customer doesn't get pissed at being "stacked" multiple times).

      Extra credit for all the germs passed from customer to customer touching the button - although with some "gating" system sort of like freeway onramp metering and

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
    48. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by uncqual · · Score: 1

      ARGH... I meant to post the above response to the previous comment.

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
    49. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      anonymously, moderation, all that...

      Custom poker chips, good ones, run about $0.60/each for full-custom, double-sided, with edge markings, provided a reasonable volume is produced and, on short notice, would be, for the duration of the event, very very difficult to counterfeit. I suggest full ceramic over "clay," for the best intersection of price and customization.

      You could have plenty of them for a small investment, and at $0.60 a pop, losing them at $3.00 each to souvenir hunters would be fine too.

    50. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fry's Electronics has figured out how to do it reasonably. Each register has a light, when you're next in line you go to a register when it lights up. When the cashier is done with a customer, they turn on the light. Works like a charm.

    51. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason for two ordering queues is to make processing orders more efficient. Some items (fries, nuggets, ..) are just as easy to make twice as many. By receiving order 1&2 simultaneously you can potentially save time on overlapping orders.
      In addition, sometimes we encounter people who order slowly, in this case it only slows down 1/2 the line instead of the whole system.

    52. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by rmdingler · · Score: 1
      Ohhhh!

      I see why it's news for Nerds... it's about the number of servers.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    53. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      I put the smiley at the end of my sentence in to indicate that I was making the comment in jest, but thanks for looking out for me.

    54. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by witherstaff · · Score: 1

      I saw one of the handheld scanner places you describe in NZ in 2005. I was surprised how fast and easy it was. I'm going to assume no one would trust the average consumer not to steal and cheat the system in the USA.

    55. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by The+Technomancer · · Score: 1

      It doesn't speed things up. It serves two purposes -- optics to bring it more customers, and ensure there's the optimal amount of orders going through the system for as long as possible. If you're hungry, and you see a long drive-through line, it may dissuade you from stopping at the restaurant. Two lanes merging into one hides some of that.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.

      -- Arthur C. Clarke

    56. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by P1h3r1e3d13 · · Score: 1

      It's really not uncommon (outside of grocery stores). Almost every fast food restaurant does this, for example. And banks. Just think of anywhere where the people behind the counter announce, ÃoeI can help the next person.Ã

    57. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by bennetthaselton · · Score: 0

      Yes you can always speed up the system by having multiple "cash registers". But I think the proportional gains are much bigger by simply bringing ice to the table before the order is placed.

      Suppose in the existing system, each person goes to the front, places an order, the person takes their order and goes back to the truck to get the ice from a guy handing ice bags out of the truck, and then the bag goes to the customer. Two employees and you can handle about 1 customer per minute.

      If you had 12 employees instead of 2, then you could handle 6 customers per minute.

      On the other hand, if you had the ice bags ready on the counter before the customer placed the order, then you'd probably only need 3 employees working concurrently (one to take the cash, two to keep the ice bags coming), and each transaction would probably come in under 10 seconds so you'd still handle 6 customers per minute.

      You could always do both (more cash registers, and bags of ice pre-fetched on the counter). But if you call for more cash registers, they might object that they don't have the manpower to provide that. On the other hand there's really no good reason not to have the bags of ice on the table already ready for the customer to pick them up.

    58. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by mjwx · · Score: 1

      One supermarket chain around Albany, NY tried implementing the single line system about a year ago. It only lasted a few months before they reverted.

      At least at the grocery store, people disliked feeling corralled like cattle more than they dislike waiting slightly longer in a less efficient line. Might have been the way it was implemented, honestly. It had a rather frenetic feel to it, with the line “leader” guiding people to one of the actual registers with quite a bit of urgency and insistence. I’d guess there was probably some misguided, management-imposed, career-limiting metric system associated with the process such that the employee ultimately paid the price if customers dawdled and brought the throughput numbers down. That translated to a rather jarring mood to the whole thing.

      Some stores have implemented this in several stores in Australia, one line served by a dozen checkouts and it actually is faster. The biggest issue is that they have more room to line the area with impulse items (not an issue for me as I can ignore impulse items, but I understand the point).

      Airport check-in does it as well for the same reason. When you're processing 2-500 people which can take 5 to 15 minutes a piece (Oh dear god, she's fumbling through her 16 suitcases for her passport) having a longer line serviced by multiple people is faster and more efficient. However the lines tend to need a little bit of management, but it stops people from jumping from line to line and eliminates confusion. My only issue is with slow pokes... but I just overtake them when they take too long picking up their bags and moving forward.

      However this isn't the right approach for a drinks line (who lines up for ice?), it's the opposite of a checkout or airport check in where the transaction is expected to take several minutes. With a drinks line you want people to get in and out as fast as possible, the best way to do this is to have multiple satellite stations rather than one main station to distribute the load but this is difficult and expensive.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    59. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my first thought was "one queue for tokens and another location for pickup using the single-queue-to-multiple-registers". This blog post was more along the lines of, "durr, me like ice, get now" than an actual "algorithm."

      There should be two lines. One line for people who can queue like the British and one line for everyone else.

      Snipers will pick out anyone who queues in to the British line and cant queue like the British.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    60. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 0

      McDonald's did it's motion efficiency studies decades and decades ago, and hasn't kept up the work.

      You can say the same thing about Microsoft. If they were still doing human-interface-efficiency work, they wouldn't have tried to make a "flat" interface. (Or for that matter, copied by so many others.) "Flat" is nothing more than a fad, and a destructive one; it throws away valuable feedback cues.

      Anyway, the main point I wanted to make is that Haseltine is wrong about at least one thing. Not in principle, but in practice:

      So the total amount of labor is always going to be the same, for a fixed number of ice bags.

      This isn't a "wrong" statement, it's just irrelevant. What you have to consider, when you move the lines faster, is not the total amount of labor, but the amount of labor per time.

      If the line moves 4 times faster, for 1/4 the time, then you need 4 times the laborers... for 1/4 the time. You don't get to multiply people the same way you can speed.

    61. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      s/Haseltine/Haselton damn you autocorrect

    62. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Why not just bring more ice, then?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    63. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The culprit:
      http://www.hme.com/

    64. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. You're joking I know, but this is news for nerds because nerds are pretentious know-it-alls that have to come into every single thread and either just bitch in general or point out all of the pedantic things they've found wrong. Since you've shown up just to bitch about a story you have no interest in, I will go ahead and dub thee "A True Nerd" ergo this is News For Nerds. Now fuck off!

    65. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by Hecatonchires · · Score: 1

      I saw this at a festival where you could buy tokens to have a shower. Unfortunately people stockpiled the tokens(buying enough for the weekend) which led to noone else being able to buy one until one had been used.

      I guess I'm saying make sure your token is in sufficient quantities.

      --

      Yay me!

    66. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      If the line moves 4 times faster, for 1/4 the time, then you need 4 times the laborers... for 1/4 the time. You don't get to multiply people the same way you can speed.

      Power vs Energy. ;)

      He does actually point this out - his example was rather than needing 5 volunteers doing 1 hour shifts sequentially, they do it in parallel. Which raises the question of whether you HAVE 5 volunteers, or just 1 doing a 5 hour shift...

      Still, one would have to ask how many bags a volunteer can carry - if he can carry 3 per trip, but ends up only carrying 1-2 much of the time, a caching system would be more efficient because he can just keep hauling 3 bags per trip rather than 1-2 if that's all the current customer is ordering.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    67. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by mordjah · · Score: 1

      Errant mod.. sorry

      --
      "A mind reader? That sounds like sci fi." "Honey, we live on a space ship"
    68. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So just have the next person go to a register when the previous person has completed unloading their stuff rather than wait until they're leaving.

    69. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by pepty · · Score: 1

      Replace most of the volunteers with one roller conveyor: one end in the truck, one at the counter. One volunteer in the truck loads ice, one at the counter just takes money and never even touches the bags.

    70. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many of the telemarketeers that call you to sell you some product (or just to ask you to participate in an interview) will use Erlang to determine the amount of call center agents they need to fill the required quota within the specified time. It requires a bit more number shuffling since you're obviously going to have to deal with people who don't want to participate, but Erlang is almost always at the root of the algorithm.

    71. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Good idea! They even make fancy ones that can bend to turn corners a bit and use the shape of the rollers to keep the product on them going the right direction and not falling off the conveyor.

      A slight slope would be all that you'd need to keep the product moving without any further human assistance.

      Depending, the ice truck should already have one available. Heck, worst case have a cart.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    72. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      How much more?

      They have a fairly functional system, there's a lot of risk changing it.

      Too much ice would syck for them too I imagine.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    73. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by j-beda · · Score: 1

      The most "efficient" method in terms of customers served per unit time is multiple lines, one behind each register - then there is minimal downtime between customers and the numbers served are maximized, however it has the major disadvantage of not minimizing the time spent in line by each customer - the unlucky ones pick a slow attendant who managed to get all of the slow patrons with special situations that need extra time to serve. The one line feeding separate servers is most fair as everyone goes through the same line and nobody gets stuck waiting for the slow server or stuck behind the slow patrons while being passed by the lucky patrons who got the faster lines. However, the one line has the disadvantage of causing a delay for everyone for each customer as the customer walks to the checkout from the front of the single line. This can be substantive: if the walk is ten seconds and the line is 60 people long, this is 600 seconds, or ten extra minutes you would be standing in line compared to if the walk was instantaneous. The way around this is to have a long line feeding to short lines (even only one patron deep) at each checkout. Yes, people stuck behind a problem patron can sometimes wait a bit longer than they might like, but on average they tend to be better off. I have seen this type of thing work well at customs checkpoints at airports, where there is someone in authority telling people where to go. The difficulty of course is that any of these single line->multiple checkers work well without mechnisms to keep them working - either a machine or a person telling the next in line where to go and ideally watching the whole system to work around individual slowdowns and special cases. It is not very self-organizing.

    74. Re: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      Actually, I would've thought it quite simple to add an Ice fee to the ticket price and just give out ice for free during the event. Ice supplier still gets paid, and the illusion of free ice keeps everyone happy.

  2. An algorithm to end BH posting by kruach+aum · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why does Bennett Hassleton keep using /. as his personal blog, and why is he allowed to? I post this question every time he does a blog, and I've never received a proper answer.

    pre-emptive: Can I find anything wrong with what you wrote? Yes, the fact what you wrote is displayed where it is.

    1. Re:An algorithm to end BH posting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm more curious about what kind of dessert it is and why they need ice with it?

      For others' future reference, I remember how to spell desert versus dessert like this - the desert is a "bad" place so you don't want much of it (one 's') whereas dessert is delicious so you want all you can get (two 'ss').

    2. Re:An algorithm to end BH posting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Because the negatives don't outweigh the positives!"

      I had a hard time keeping a straight face while typing that. I think I'm going to go collapse and die of laughter now.

      It's because he and Timothy are engaged. What else did you expect?

    3. Re:An algorithm to end BH posting by MagicM · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not only that, but this is just a weird form of Slashdot click bait.

      "by making one small... Well, read the description below"

      Seriously? Ridiculous.

    4. Re:An algorithm to end BH posting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No idea who the guy is but such a monster long section of just text and why do I care about ice needs at druggie man. Make a YouTube video and make it amusing. I have enough documentation to read. DiceDot, you're a lost cause.

    5. Re:An algorithm to end BH posting by s.petry · · Score: 1

      Because burning man is cool and so is pot I guess.. Either that or a slow news/post day so they are trying to increase traffic.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    6. Re:An algorithm to end BH posting by CaptainLard · · Score: 2

      ... just a weird form...

      Don't you mean "one weird trick"? Its the first option in the current poll on clickbait for crying out loud! Why'd you all vote for that option!?

    7. Re:An algorithm to end BH posting by radtea · · Score: 2

      I just tried to exclude all BH postings (using the "excluded terms" thing in the options settings) and when I do I don't see any stories at all. Is his name somehow attached to every single story on /.?

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    8. Re:An algorithm to end BH posting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you didn't post on his blog, they wouldn't accept his shit.

    9. Re:An algorithm to end BH posting by gman003 · · Score: 2

      Since DICE obviously isn't going to stop him from blogging here, can we at least make him an editor so he can post them himself and we can block him specifically?

    10. Re:An algorithm to end BH posting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since DICE obviously isn't going to stop him from blogging here, can we at least make him an editor so he can post them himself and we can block him specifically?

      Good luck with that.

      Nerval's Lobster is already a slashdot editor, but he never posts his own stuff, so we can't block him, either.

    11. Re:An algorithm to end BH posting by Skarjak · · Score: 1

      You have a point. It's funny he made the blog considering how dismissive of him the company was. They don't care about his (extremely obvious) suggestion, why should we? If they're going through the trouble of lying about it, it's because they feel their approach is more profitable.

    12. Re:An algorithm to end BH posting by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Dessert is twice as sweet.

    13. Re:An algorithm to end BH posting by bennetthaselton · · Score: 0

      I thought about putting the entire idea in the summary before the link. But I also wanted to give people a chance to see if the exact same idea would occur to them, after reading the description of how it's done now.

      But you're right, I didn't like how it sounded like all those one-weird-trick ads about how to pay down your mortgage with acai berries.

    14. Re:An algorithm to end BH posting by bennetthaselton · · Score: 1

      Assuming they're in it to make a profit at all, how would it not be more profitable to sell more bags of ice per minute?

      And, maybe getting the idea out there will cause it to gain more traction and they'll do it. I assume that's why Burning Man implemented the shuttle service from the airport.

    15. Re:An algorithm to end BH posting by Skarjak · · Score: 1

      As someone above said, maybe they have a finite stock they can bring to these events, and so selling them quickly is not a concern. There could be other justifications. Still, just think about it: they lied to you about regulations stopping them from doing the obvious. Why would they do that? Clearly there must be a purpose behind this lie. I don't think your suggestion will help. Also, I don't really think this content is appropriate for slashdot. This is hardly an "algorithm". I'm pretty sure everyone who read the article immediately understood that bringing the packs of ice to the front would help low wait times.

  3. ugh... not more of this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    no one wants to read Bennett's ideas.

  4. What the actual fuck is this article going on abou by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously, how is this news? This is some guy's heat stress-induced hallucination fixation about carrying ice around a desert.

  5. You're doing it wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    65,000 people don't belong in any dessert. That's clearly unsanitary.

    1. Re:You're doing it wrong. by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2

      65,000 people don't belong in any dessert. That's clearly unsanitary.

      Tell that to Vegas. They like it dirty.

    2. Re:You're doing it wrong. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      65,000 people don't belong in any dessert. That's clearly unsanitary.

      [_] Shhhh ... it's made from soylent green :-)
      [_] Well, we had to find a new use for all those zombie parts coming on-stream thanks to ebola.
      [_] "You got people in my dessert!" "You got dessert in my people!"
      [_] It's Burning Man. They'll eat anything.
      [_] You know our slogan - "it's real people food?" Well, what did you expect?
      [_] You're right - there's not enough people in the dessert. Everyone knows 640k should be enough.
      [_] At Burning Man, people desert YOU (probably because of the smell after the first few days ...)

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  6. What is this nonsense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go complain in /r/self

  7. Really? by ourlovecanlastforeve · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People not only expect to have ice, but are complaining that the lines are too long... ...In the middle of the desert.

    The lines are too long. For ice. In the middle of the desert.

    What the actual fucking fuck.

    1. Re:Really? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      It's Burning Man. The people who attend have fried their brains so the obvious dichotomy of the situation is lost on them.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    2. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He said "dessert", not "desert". Makes sense now, doesn't it?

    3. Re:Really? by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Insightful
      And the OP said in his post:

      "I'm being fairly pedantic here because I want to make it clear that I think that I think there's no counterargument to be made to this"

      I believe part of the ethos of Burning Man is, "if you think you can do it better, then do it yourself. Don't complain, don't whine." It's cool that he thought of a way to improve the world, but in the real world, if you don't do something about it, then it doesn't matter much.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    4. Re:Really? by operagost · · Score: 1

      But the lines are too long. And we should fix that, because we can.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    5. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to read the article until ... Until so long ago I don't remember. Then Slashdot's ugly bastard half cousin named DiceDot showed up and blabbers so much the summary was taken off the table. Now its becoming just a title or partial title until I realize it's another lame dud. I then proceed to come here and type some nonsense dribble like this post.

      Now I almost am moving to skipping the title entirely and just checking for +5 informative (they call you the audience) before deciding if DiceDot is owed a competent comment or a complete waste time for everyone shit post like this one.

    6. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the one thing you cannot do yourself. Only the ice vendor is allowed to sell ice. You are not allowed to, so you can't just take over the ice concession.

      dom

    7. Re:Really? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      This is the one thing you cannot do yourself. Only the ice vendor is allowed to sell ice. You are not allowed to, so you can't just take over the ice concession.

      ok then, yet another example of how Burning Man has sold out. Forget it, I'll be camping in Yosemite.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    8. Re:Really? by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      This is the one thing you cannot do yourself. Only the ice vendor is allowed to sell ice. You are not allowed to, so you can't just take over the ice concession.

      dom

      You can always give it away. That's what all the coffee camps, bars, and food places at Burning Man do.

    9. Re:Really? by Triklyn · · Score: 1

      as a self-identified member of the "people" group, i am offended that you would include the likes of BH in our number.

  8. White people problems by Tailhook · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seriously.

    Trust fund rebel white people problems, in particular.

    --
    Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    1. Re:White people problems by plopez · · Score: 1

      To make it more realistic we can produce the ice using raw sewage. Now THAT is a problem....

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  9. Oh noes by oldmac31310 · · Score: 3, Funny

    The united colours of Hazel Bennetton strikes again!

    --
    http://www.acetonestudio.com
  10. your assuming a lot by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

    Your assuming that the Nevada health and safety are the local health inspector(s). A group of people who may well hate burning man and have no downside to misinterpreting the regs.

    Your assuming the volunteers scale in a linear fashion while accessing the same truck.

    Perhaps the altruistic vendor wants to inflate their ego by having people wait for hours for their product?

    This is a scenario where if you think you can do it better rent a freezer truck and buy some ice see how well you do.

    --
    No sir I dont like it.
    1. Re:your assuming a lot by plopez · · Score: 1

      And good faith in regards to the 'turbo' line. It would be a great idea for line jumping. Fan some cash out but the one is actually a 10 ten argue with the person who then caves in and lets you into the the front of the hour long line. A win-win for you-you!

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    2. Re:your assuming a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *you're

      for fuck's sake.

    3. Re: your assuming a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahhh...so if the lines were only five minutes instead of an hour the volunteers would t get free booze....I think we all know why the lines are so inefficient now.

    4. Re:your assuming a lot by bennetthaselton · · Score: 1

      The volunteers might not scale in a linear fashion. But it would certainly be faster. In any case you could keep scaling them up until the truck becomes the bottleneck, and then decide whether or not to keep scaling up from there, taking the diminishing returns into account.

      I doubt the Nevada Health Department would give wrong information just to screw with BM, but you do have a good point that it would be a good idea to get a formal statement from them, in advance, that this was OK. The guy who answered my inquiry did say "Your questions regarding ice service at Burning Man was brought to my attention as we are the health authority for the Burning Man event", so I assume I got the right people.

      As I think someone else pointed out, nobody except the official ice vendor is allowed to sell ice at Burning Man, so it's not like I can just go and do it myself...

    5. Re:your assuming a lot by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      Moving the truck closer etc etc. Would seem most expedient to hand the ice off at the truck.

      The state health dept will not but the local inspector might. That inspector who has the power to close it down at his whim is not a good one to argue with unnecessarily.

      So you have an artificial scarcity as the event only allows specific vendors. Do they have any motivation to improve? Lack of competition tends to stagnate things.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
  11. I for one by stonedead · · Score: 0

    do NOT like people in my dessert, certainly not 65,000 of them as toppings. Desert is supposed to be delicious and all, but stop glorifying cannibalism, NOW!

    1. Re:I for one by plopez · · Score: 1

      You must be one of those vegetarian hippies ;)

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    2. Re:I for one by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1
      PETA has no problem with consuming meat, as long as it's made from people and not animals.

      Say welcome to our cannibalistic PETA overlords.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    3. Re:I for one by Triklyn · · Score: 1

      wouldn't PETA overlords be really really easy to overthrow?

      attack dogs

    4. Re:I for one by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      PETA euthanizes 90% of the dogs they get within 24 hours. They've got it down to a science. They're like people who put down their pets because "it's better than maybe going to a home where they're not loved." Maybe if we didn't have laws against them doing that to their offspring, they'd weed themselves out of the gene pool quicker.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  12. 65,000 people in the dessert by Megahard · · Score: 1

    Now that's a good time.

    --
    I eat only the real part of complex carbohydrates.
    1. Re:65,000 people in the dessert by bob.lansdorp · · Score: 1

      Now that's a good time.

      I was thinking that too. Is it a giant chocolate mousse? Or perhaps a big tub of jello?

    2. Re:65,000 people in the dessert by bob.lansdorp · · Score: 1

      65,000 people in the dessert: it's a chocolate moose :D

    3. Re:65,000 people in the dessert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds more like a chocolate mess. ;)

  13. Confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > 65,000 people in the dessert
    Never mind the ice, where did they get enough whipped cream?

  14. Obvious solutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure if it's kosher to use plastic at Burning man, but the most obvious solution is have everyone waiting in line pay while they are in line, and just have volunteers constantly handing out ice to everyone who paid in advance. Even without going the plastic route, they could have multiple volunteers that handle cash actually go down the line switching cash for a ice token, and then they just deposit/punch-a-hole-in the token at wherever to pick up the ice without having to needing to verify anything.

    Another solution is just to go the self-serve route entirely. This would require a bit more engineering on the part of who handles the ice, but in a sense, you know those ice-machines you see in hotels? Well scale that up, and put a few of them out there, and just go something like 3$ = one bucket or cooler of ice.

    1. Re:Obvious solutions by plopez · · Score: 1

      Nice one!. It would work out great for me I can wander up and down the line taking money and then just disappear into the crowd. A win-win for me-me!

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    2. Re:Obvious solutions by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      of course an even more obvious solution is to open your own ice franchise at Burning Man, there's obviously the demand if queue's are an hour long, and £3 for a bag of water.... and he can implement his idea, make a fortune *and* post smugly about how great he is for thinking it up!

    3. Re:Obvious solutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where are you going to get the volunteer t-shirt and badge from if you aren't actually a volunteer?

    4. Re:Obvious solutions by plopez · · Score: 1

      mugging

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  15. Wow. by jpellino · · Score: 2

    This is a longer article than the one about India getting to Mars BY AN ORDER OF MAGNITUDE. And I thought the fact that Harry Potter has a longer WP entry than Prince Harry was ridiculous.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    1. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And I thought the fact that Harry Potter has a longer WP entry than Prince Harry was ridiculous.

      Well in Harry Potter's defense he is a much more important person as far as many are concerned.

    2. Re:Wow. by Kurast · · Score: 1

      For me, living outside England, Harry Potter is far more important than Prince Harry.

    3. Re:Wow. by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      And I thought the fact that Harry Potter has a longer WP entry than Prince Harry was ridiculous.

      Well in Harry Potter's defense he is a much more important person as far as many are concerned.

      As far as anyone sane is concerned.

      Harry Potter is big business, employment for thousands.. Prince Harry is small time entertainment.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
  16. "Gathering in the Dessert". heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jello wrestling?

    What do editors do around here?

  17. Why not direct? Eliminate the ice line altogether by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Skip the staff handling ice at all. Allow customers to get their ice from the freezer directly after presenting a token/coupon/receipt that is purchased asynchronously elsewhere (or online?).

    Voila! No more lines at all!

  18. Why do they have a counter? by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
    Look, if moving the ice to the counter is taking up that much time, don't take the table.

    Just sell it from the back of a truck.. Have a guy taking money right there.

    The only reason shops usually have a counter is 1) to display MULTIPLE items.

    and 2) to discourage grab and run.

    They are only selling ice and ice is not easy to grab and run.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:Why do they have a counter? by Sir+Realist · · Score: 1

      My thought exactly. Why come up with a more efficient solution for your staff / volunteers to move the ice from the truck to the customer, when you can just make the customer do it. Which they'll happily do, since they're there anyways, and it will get them out the door and iced faster.

  19. hallo, Junis, is that you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Bennett Hassleton is the latest in a honored linage traced from Roland Piquepaille all the way back through the mists of time to the legendary Jon Katz. These are the alpha-trolls of /., it would behoove you to honor them.

    1. Re:hallo, Junis, is that you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shit I forgot about Roland.

      I am very tired of Bennett and his walls of text

    2. Re:hallo, Junis, is that you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      back through the mists of time to the legendary Jon Katz

      It's just another aspect of our post-9/11 world.

    3. Re:hallo, Junis, is that you? by irrational_design · · Score: 1

      Mists of time? Legendary? Now I feel old. I clearly remember reading his articles. And I clearly remember all the complaints about his articles in the comments. Some things never change.

    4. Re:hallo, Junis, is that you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bennett Haselton is a philanthropic pretzel tycoon who keeps Slashdot running with his generous donations. Clicking away his rants is a small price to pay.

  20. Clickbait by CAPSLOCK2000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is there any relation between this article and the poll on clickbait?

    Algorithm? check
    Burning Man? check
    Bennett Haselton? check
    Frustrated Slashdot readers posting furiously? guaranteed
    Sounds like clickbait to me.

    This is not even an algorithm. I'm not going to explain why not, if you don't know you shouldn't post here.

    1. Re:Clickbait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not even an algorithm.

      THIS. I mean it's beyond fucking obvious what he proposed. In the 20 seconds after reading the post, grabbing a beer and then clicking the 'read more' I was thinking "...caching, parallelisation, error handling, pre-emptive processing..." and I'm rewarded with 'dump the ice bags on the table,' which the operator, had known about the bogus regulation, would have done without even thinking about it.

    2. Re:Clickbait by bennetthaselton · · Score: 1

      You're right. "Algorithm" was probably the wrong word. But that's probably a less important point than the question of whether a simple change could save people thousands of man-hours spent waiting in the desert sun every year.

  21. Threading by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 4, Funny

    Given that you are trying to upgrade the problem from a single threaded sequential algorithm to a multi-threaded algorithm, I feel there should be a semaphore in there somewhere.

  22. Not Health but Money by freeze128 · · Score: 1

    If you want to know why companies do the things that they do, it's not because of health regulations.... It's because of money.

    How about this: The ice truck workers are paid hourly. They would rather get paid for an all-day episode of unloading ice rather than just 2-3 hours.

    Or maybe they got too many complaints about melted ice from customers who demanded a refund. It's the money, I'm sure of it.

    1. Re: Not Health but Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the free booze the get from line jumpers

    2. Re:Not Health but Money by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      If that's the case, then the workers are poisoning the business and preventing it from reaching it's full profitable potential. The hourly wage should be scrapped in favor of a share of the the revenue.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    3. Re:Not Health but Money by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      I think the workers are volunteers.

    4. Re:Not Health but Money by Mab_Mass · · Score: 1

      How about this: The ice truck workers are paid hourly. They would rather get paid for an all-day episode of unloading ice rather than just 2-3 hours.

      Wrong. The people doing the actual ice moving/selling are all volunteers. In fact, the overwhelming majority of people doing any of the infrastructure of the event are volunteers. (The one notable exception is cleaning the port-a-potties.)

  23. Speeding up the sales may change the whole game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is capitalism. Supply-demand.

    If you speed up the actual sale process, you will sell much more in the same time. In other words, the queue is discouraging people from buying ice thus reducing demand. Maybe arctica does not want to sell more ice. Maybe they cannot bring more in. If you speed things up, you will need more ice, else you will run out of stock.

    Of course there is also psychology. If there are no long queues, ice is less desirable to own. Also you can postpone the purchase, as it is easy to get some. The overall amount sold may even decrease!

    Vajk

  24. Nobody ever got fired for... by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

    The call to speed up the ice lines is not an intellectual exercise. Unless there's a non-obvious major problem with making this change, this is something that could be done the very next year, and would save people thousands of person-hours waiting in line in the sun.

    Nobody ever got fired for doing things the way they've always been done. Maybe it's time to change ice vendors to someone willing to serve it up faster.

    1. Re:Nobody ever got fired for... by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Have two vendors. The one that processes more people quickly gets more money. Competition is a bad word probably though.

    2. Re:Nobody ever got fired for... by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      I think they are volunteers. I don't think it's about changing ice vendors, but about telling your existing volunteers how you you want them to take the money and give out the ice.

    3. Re:Nobody ever got fired for... by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      Why is competition a bad word?

    4. Re:Nobody ever got fired for... by Triklyn · · Score: 1

      hippies

  25. You've got to be kidding me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The festival of self-reliance has somewhere to buy ice? Something you can make with no thought at all with a $90 HF generator, $20 worth of gas, a $150 ice maker, and a few gallons of water ($0-ish). For crying out loud...

    1. Re:You've got to be kidding me by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      Figure out how much ice you will need.

      Get some relatively cheap, thick Styrofoam coolers.

      Put the ice in the coolers, cover with dry ice.

      Put the coolers in the shade.

      (Use gloves to move the dry ice around.)

  26. Marketing by PPH · · Score: 2

    The long line is to convince hipsters that the product must really be special. If there wasn't a line, the $3 price would probably drop.

    Next year: iIce (as long as Apple doesn't sue). No one will think twice about waiting in line overnight.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Marketing by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      iCe?

    2. Re: Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lice - check your fonts carefully; very carefully.

    3. Re: Marketing by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Nice. Slipping a Helvetica reference in there too.

  27. Obligatory YouTube by kimanaw · · Score: 1

    Silicon Valley Queue Service Algorithm I wonder which one is Bennett ?

    --
    007: "Who are you?"
    Pussy: "My name is Pussy Galore."
    007: "I must be dreaming..."
  28. Another way to beat the paid/delivery issue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have one line to pay, split into at least an express exact change and change needed line at the end. Exact change lines should be 2x as many as need change and people will make their own change in line as much as possible.

    Paying gets you tokens and let into a small second queue corralled area. From the corralled area you trade tokens for bags of ice. As long as there are people in the corralled area just keep delivering ice from the truck as you are assured it has already been paid for.

    You would need about 50 tokens in circulation for a 10 person corral. Just keep circulating the tokens. If the coral gets full then slow down the money transactions.

    1. Re:Another way to beat the paid/delivery issue. by JimFive · · Score: 1

      I don't think this works out. People would buy all the tokens they think they'll need for the event up front and then just turn in the tokens to get ice as they need it. That way they only have to wait in the money line once. If the delay is in the money handling then tokens and separate lines are probably a good idea, but if the delay is in the actual transfer of the ice then having money separate from delivery doesn't really change anything.
      --
      JimFive

      --
      Please stop using the word theory when you mean hypothesis.
  29. in the *dessert* ???? by tekrat · · Score: 2

    Seriously; are there people in this world that are getting PAID to administrate and edit Slashdot? If so, please sign me up for this sweet gig. If not; then I can understand this kind of sloppiness as it's just a hobby.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:in the *dessert* ???? by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      Seriously; are there people in this world that are getting PAID to administrate and edit Slashdot? If so, please sign me up for this sweet gig. If not; then I can understand this kind of sloppiness as it's just a hobby.

      No. If we all get a job at slashdot, who'll be the silly idiots that read/comment on the crap that we'll post? If you want slashdot to stop posting shit stories, then stop reading slashdot. If no one reads slashdot... well you know.

      Not that there aren't already like 50% bots here now. Ever wonder why the CAPTCHA is usually along the same lines as what you're posting? Maybe the bots are editing the site by now, who knows.

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
  30. Better process by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Putting aside whether or not the posting is appropriate for ./ ...

    Two sets of queues work better for this scenario:

    1: Payment queue in tent. Money is exchanged for tokens. One token is good for one bag of ice.
    2: Delivery queue at truck. Tokens exchanged for ice directly from truck.

    Each queue has as many stations as the resources allow. Five point-of-sale systems means five stations for the first queue. Three pairs of workers pulling ice from the truck means three stations at the truck.

    I think this is optimal for the concerns of maximizing throughput, minimizing time ice spends out of the truck, and minimizing the distance/number-of-hands that the ice moves through.

    As to the question of whether or not computer science people think in terms of algorithms more than other folk, I would say yes. All engineers think in terms of algorithms...that is what makes them engineers. That mindset can be found in other disciplines, so it would be wrong to assert that all non-engineers cannot think that way. The average Joe probably thinks far less about algorithmic optimization.

  31. not the lines you should be worried about by silfen · · Score: 1

    The problem with Burning Man lines is the regular screw-ups at the gates every year. They cause lines that are many miles long with people stuck in their cars for half a day or longer. And those screw-ups are frequently technological.

    http://blog.burningman.com/201...

    Waiting in line for an hour to get ice while chatting with other burners... not a problem, and if it really bothers you, just come back another time.

    1. Re:not the lines you should be worried about by geekoid · · Score: 2

      The problem with burning man is it became hip and popular.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  32. In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Granola eating hippies are ineffective businessmen who are willing to tolerate losing customers to long wait times instead of increasing their efficiency/capacity because capitalism is evil... or something.

    If you want to do it better: do it better. You made your suggestion. As business owners it is their prerogative to leave money at the table.

    They probably have a fixed ice transport/storage capacity and don't care about their efficiency as long as they sell out every year. If they are still amortizing out their initial capital investments it may not make sense for them to increase their transport/storage capacity because of the associated risks of growing their businesses too quickly and over-leveraging themselves.

    Frankly, the lowest hanging fruit in my mind is hiring an additional cashier or doing what In & Out Burger does in California(another business that keeps their prices artificially low making demand excessive/long wait times) and have the cashier walk the line and sell "ice tokens" which simplifies the cash handling at the front counter and keeps the ice distribution as an uninterrupted continuous process.

    If you want Burning Man to be more efficient, ban hippies from attending since they are too busy smoking pot to care about things like "Lean" or profit maximization.

  33. skipped this year but went in 2013 by enjar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's quite a roundabout way of saying "I've been once".

    1. Re:skipped this year but went in 2013 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is one more time than is necessary.

  34. I've seen it happen by tomhath · · Score: 1

    I've been to events where they take an order for a hamburger, take your money, cook that hamburger, serve it, and then take the next order. It's painful to watch.

    But from what I've read about Burning Man it wouldn't surprise me that this kind of thing goes on there.

    1. Re:I've seen it happen by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      I found burning man to do things rather efficiently given their requirements. I used to hate the line to leave, and as a software engineer who remembers his queuing theory, I had all these great ideas of how the line to leave could be improved. Within a year they implemented "Pulsing", which basically did exactly what I would have done. You still have to wait X hours to leave, but now you can shut off your car and sleep, or hang out with people, and you don't need to worry as much about people cutting in line.

      There are a lot of really smart people who go to burning man.

  35. Thank you Captain Obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now go tell the BM organisers rather than posting drivel here. They might give a shit.

  36. Dessert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Any gathering of 65,000 people in the dessert..." That's got to be one huge lava cake!

  37. Flawed analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The rate-limiting factors here are walking ice bags from the truck, and making change.

    Bennet doesn't offer any solution to the first problem, and his turbo line solution would offer only a small help to a subset of customers.

    Here's a real solution: the desk staff take money, make change, and hand out tokens. The customer then walks over to the back of the ice truck where dedicated staff will exchange tokens for ice bags. This can be as simple as, "show me a token, drop it in the bucket, I pass you a bag." Each staffer remains at their task without switching every 30 seconds, which adds efficiency. No staffers are required to haul bags from the truck, which is an efficiency. If any bottlenecks remain, just add staff.

    1. Re:Flawed analysis by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

      You may have missed the word, "volunteer". Maybe they can't add staff. If there's only one staffer at a time, then one-at-a-time is the only way.

    2. Re:Flawed analysis by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      But that simple solution wouldn't require Bennett's painfully long convoluted opining on the subject with clickbait teaser.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    3. Re:Flawed analysis by bennetthaselton · · Score: 1

      Even if they use tokens, the bag-pickup would still be a bottleneck if the person taking the token then has to walk to the back of the truck, grab the bag, and bring it back, which slows the line down more than anything. If they have the bag already sitting on the counter though, that will speed up the line whether the bags are already sitting on the counter or not.

  38. Diarrhea of the keyboard by QuietLagoon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This guy has a serious case of it.

  39. "Read on for the rest" WTF by wiredlogic · · Score: 2

    ...by making one small... Well, read the description below of how they do things now,

    I'ts one thing to have to see BH's articles but Slashdot has NEVER sunk to the level of using lame journalistic teasers. The summary should sumarize. It doesn't exist just to coax someone into loading a fresh ad.

    This is the sort of crap that has shrunk the user base. Stop doing it Dice.

    --
    I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    1. Re:"Read on for the rest" WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The summary should sumarize. It doesn't exist just to coax someone into loading a fresh ad.

      Ads on the web? In 2014? Turn in your geek card.

    2. Re:"Read on for the rest" WTF by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      I don't have ads. The problem is that the mentality of pushing page views at all costs results in this sort of fragmentary crap.

      Back before Dice I tried to whitelist ads for /. just to give back some and found that I couldn't get them anyway because they were deactivated for accounts above a certain karma/age threshold.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    3. Re:"Read on for the rest" WTF by bennetthaselton · · Score: 1

      The point was for the reader to see if they would independently come up with the same suggestion that I did, after reading a description of how they do things now.

  40. Supply & demand by Ichijo · · Score: 1

    The existence of a queue means that people are willing to pay more for the product. So why not let them? Raise the price as the queue gets longer, and lower the price as the queue gets shorter. This stabilizes and even lets you control the length of the queue.

    They should do the same at ballparks on game day. Instead of charging a fixed rate for parking, charge to go through the gate according to the number of cars waiting to get in or out. If you get there really early, you could get in practically for free, and if you tailgate after the game, you can get out practically for free. With shorter queues and a greater ability to save money, everybody wins!

    --
    Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    1. Re:Supply & demand by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Can't.

      You should be able to do this, but politics gets in the way. People have an idea of what a bag of ice is "worth" and may be willing to wait hours for it, but won't adjust their internal valuation without long-term pricing pressures and will react strongly to the idea that they're being "ripped off."

      http://www.econlib.org/library...

      It's easy to forget that you're not buying ice. You're buying ice in a remote location in the desert where a lot of other people are also present, but no appreciable infrastructure is in place

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    2. Re:Supply & demand by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      Then open two queues: one for people willing to pay the market price, and the other for people who want the old price. Since the ice is still available at the old price, nobody can complain of being ripped off.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    3. Re:Supply & demand by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      You absolutely can do it. For me, $850 for an iphone is a ripoff. That doesn't mean they Apple can't sell iphones for $850, it just means they can't sell it to me.

      Those same people who feel like they are getting ripped off can feel great that they are getting such a great deal when the ice is cheap.

      Ice, even at burning man, is not a necessity. If you choose to make it a necessity by bringing only potato salad to eat for a week, that's your problem.

  41. I was promised algorithms! by Njorthbiatr · · Score: 1

    This is not algorithmic. This is logistics.

    1. Re:I was promised algorithms! by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      logistics is algorithmic.

  42. Story from Soviet Russia by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine bought Vodka in Soviet Russia and described the process as:

    Get in line and at the end of that line tell the person what you would like to order. The give you a ticket for the item.
    Get in another line and produce the ticket which you then pay for that item.

    Then get into a third line where they will very carefully scrutinize the certified paid ticket and give you your vodka if there is any left.

    He said that the time he went that the 3 lines were around 40 minutes each as the counter people were very very slow and methodical.

  43. Free Market Solution by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1, Insightful

    There is a simple free market solution to long queues: raise the price.

    1. Re:Free Market Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or allow competition. See what happens then.

    2. Re:Free Market Solution by lgw · · Score: 1

      Further, this sounds like there's a lot of money to be made, and if your line went faster, you'd make a lot more money at the same price. Anyone capable of the logistics who wants some money? Sounds like you could make a pretty sum.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    3. Re:Free Market Solution by BradMajors · · Score: 1

      There is another simple free market solution to long queues: increase the number of ice suppliers.

    4. Re:Free Market Solution by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Wow, that is simple..minded. It's been a long time since I'e seen anything the simpleminded posted on Slashdot.
      By ignoring competition, facts about turn away, logistics, and cost point you've come to a simple solution.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:Free Market Solution by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      There is a simple free market solution to long queues: raise the price.

      The first libertarian space colony is going to be a real blast.

      Not enough money to pay for the air? Suck on it.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    6. Re:Free Market Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good to see, however, that no matter how long I've been reading Slashdot, you're still an asshole, and you still can't figure out a joke when you read one. Properly, go fuck yourself!

    7. Re:Free Market Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we have libertarian societies, they're called failed states. The government that governs best governs least, nothing less than no government.

  44. this. Selling goods efficiently is business,nhippy by raymorris · · Score: 2

    It's not just programmers that think in terms of effincident please processes, in fact I'd say that's more the domain of the business person. You can get a degree in how to most effectively and efficiently run an operation to deliver goods to customers, that's called a mba. MBAs, and MBA style thinking about efficient process, is not popular with the burning man crowd.

  45. Dessert? One big pie??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    And why do we care about someone who has a misspelling in the first 10 words? Come on!

  46. Is this Godzilla news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any gathering of 65,000 people in the dessert is going to require some major infrastructure to maintain health and sanity.

    What kind of man-eating monster gathers 65000 in its dessert?

    What does the main course look like?

    Maintaining health and sanity is indeed going to require some major infrastructure. Reminds me of John Cleese in the "Architects" sketch from Monty Python.

  47. /. Poll idea by dysmal · · Score: 1

    There should be a poll to see how many people actually WANT to read Benny's latest blog post.

    1. Re:/. Poll idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't, but the responses are kind of entertaining...

  48. Sounds like a Queueing Theory problem by TheSalsa · · Score: 1

    In my opinion you need to look at the number of servers and the time it takes to serve each customer. I doubt the company who runs this service will bring out more trucks to serve the community, but if you can increase the number of actual servers at each truck it may help. However, from what the article says I would think the issue is the time it takes for each customer to get their ice from the time they step up to the counter. With a bit more information you could definitely come up with the best solution, feasible or not.

  49. mmmmmm dessert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats one long delicious dessert line

  50. Fixing the wrong problem by petes_PoV · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The reason this situation exists is because the vendor has nothing to gain from changing.

    If they have a fixed amount of ice, or can only make a fixed amount per hour then they have nothing to gain from selling that amount at a faster rate. Sure, the customers may not like it but since these guys are the only source of ice, what the customers want is of little consequence.

    If you really want to speed up the line, introduce some competition. A 3 word answer instead of a 1,600 word one.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    1. Re:Fixing the wrong problem by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      If you really want to speed up the line, introduce some competition.

      You must be new here. Free markets never work, haven't you heard?

    2. Re:Fixing the wrong problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even worse, they might be harmed from making changes that improve customer service.

      If you're a little bit overheated, and you get a bag of ice in 5 minutes, you'll slightly appreciate the bag of ice.
      If you're a little bit overheated, and then you wait in the sun for 50 minutes, then by the time you get the bag of ice, you'll be desperate for it. And then the bag of ice will seem more valuable. Even the 50 minute wait will seem worth the paradise.

      By making people wait in line, they're driving up the demand (for repeat business, perhaps next year).

    3. Re:Fixing the wrong problem by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      You're totally correct (in terms of normal context), but totally wrong (in the context of what burning man is). Burning man is about living in a temporary space where normality doesn't have to be in the context at all. Think in terms of 'people peddling ice' vs 'having a place where you have to get ice'. They each create a specific experience, but one is more in tune with what how Nature provides.

      Also let us not forget that the author of this article went once, and during a time when there was only one line for ice (judging by his writings, he didn't have a good time, missed the whole point of it, and will never go again). Normally there are at least three ice lines. The ice line should be a place that gets fit into the schedule. Otherwise the whole "burning man" experience (the experience that you should both loath and enjoy) is set into the same context that our daily lives are stuck in. Then, why go do something like burning man?

      Disclaimer: I've never been to burning man.

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    4. Re:Fixing the wrong problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you do realize that burning man is actively a noncommerce zone. the org runs the ice concession as a nod to health not to profits. There is no market in affect that competition would affect because the participants so want there to be a market there.

    5. Re:Fixing the wrong problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they have a fixed amount of ice, or can only make a fixed amount per hour then they have nothing to gain from selling that amount at a faster rate.

      In all fairness, that's not true. The people behind the counter are probably paid by the hour, and the cooling in the trucks needs to keep running (consuming fuel or battery power) as long as there's ice in them. I doubt the cost of the ice itself makes up a large part of the bill for them.

      Of course, if they run out of ice halfway through the day, the damage to their reputation, the fact that people bring their own coolers next year, as well as the burned down and overturned trucks might cost them more money in the long run.

    6. Re:Fixing the wrong problem by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      If they can dispense ice more efficiently, then the volunteers can go enjoy burning man rather than dispensing ice. The refrigerated truck can waste less energy cooling the ice.

      There is plenty of ways to make people efficient without direct competition. All you need to do is pay people to do a job. They will try to finish that job as quickly as they can without any extra incentive, because their time is valuable.

  51. Dessert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    `Nuff said, DiceDot.

  52. You're missing the obvious problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a capacity limit. No matter how fast you can perform the transaction, you can not sell more ice than they have. It might appear desirable to sell the available ice more quickly, but that would just result in a sold out shop for most of the time. The more rational thing to do is keep people waiting a short time during which continuous progress is made, instead of having them wait either a very short time if they arrive when ice is available or a long time when ice is sold out. The current process has a lower standard deviation, while any faster transaction process would not improve the average but increase the standard deviation. The volunteers might also not be very receptive to the idea of working harder (more ice moved in a smaller amount of time) just so you don't have to wait as long, especially if it is counterproductive.

    1. Re:You're missing the obvious problem by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      "instead of having them wait either a very short time if they arrive when ice is available or a long time when ice is sold out."

      If they're sold out, the waiting time in line falls to zero.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    2. Re:You're missing the obvious problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, to paraphrase your post in simple terms...

      1. If the lines are long this year, Increase the price of Ice next year. Say $5/bag.

      2. Repeat each year, until you maximize the price of Ice and the lines are of manageable length.

      3. ONLY upgrade your process when you don't sell enough ice to stay in business, then lower your price and upgrade the speed of sales.

      The only problem is that this is capitalism...

    3. Re:You're missing the obvious problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, then people line up to get ice when it becomes available. It is psychologically worse to have a shop that is closed most of the time. If you prefer, you can look at it from the demand side: The need for ice occurs independent of ice availability. Even if people are not queuing, the time between need and fulfillment varies much more with a fast intermittent queue than with a slow continuous queue.

    4. Re:You're missing the obvious problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that's certainly not what I'm saying. Burning Man is a huge event in a desert which is accessible via just one small road with two very small towns "nearby". There is an actual limit on the things you can make nearby or bring there from afar. I'm not advocating artificial scarcity or influencing demand (and profit) by changing the price. What I'm saying is that speeding up the transaction is not beneficial because it's not the bottleneck. A faster sale transaction is actually worse, because it creates an unreliability in the service provided to attendees. They wouldn't be able to go and get ice whenever they need ice, but would instead have to follow the schedule of ice deliveries. The queue is the antithesis of capitalism. Not the price but the length of the queue reflects the intensity of the need.

      The exodus protocol is another such problem where people apparently fail to grasp that there is a hard capacity limit and the queue is the fairest scheduling algorithm. The goal isn't to avoid the waiting. That can't be done. People will always wait to leave. The only things you can influence is that the wait times are fair and that waiting does not put an unnecessary burden on the people, the cars and the environment. Hence the protocol in use, which involves waiting but avoids stop-and-go traffic. It does however not suffer from random (or capitalist) unfairness like "who gets to leave when" schemes do.

  53. Competition by denbesten · · Score: 1

    Sounds like you could use your "no waiting for ice" expertise to start your own ice business and taking customers out of your competitors lines. Until then, you might want to get a job in a fast-food restaurant to learn some of the trade-secrets for expediting.

    1. Re:Competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was going to say that he should start his own ice concession but charge more that the original guys. Double your price/bag every time your line gets more than 5 min long or if you are selling faster than you have stock to support though the event. Make lots of money..

  54. Styx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bennett's got too much *clap-clap* time on his hands and it's ticking away with his sanity.

  55. your assuming a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your assuming that the Nevada health and safety are the local health inspector(s). A group of people who may well hate burning man and have no downside to misinterpreting the regs.

    Your assuming the volunteers scale in a linear fashion while accessing the same truck.

    Perhaps the altruistic vendor wants to inflate their ego by having people wait for hours for their product?

    This is a scenario where if you think you can do it better rent a freezer truck and buy some ice see how well you do.

    It is the same agency that inspects restaurants. If that is Nevada Health and Safety then that is not an assumption.

    The jobs for the volunteers are broken up pretty well. Want to say there are something like 4-5 different jobs associated with the ice. They scale pretty well.

    The altruistic vendor is actually a bunch of volunteers and the money made goes to charity. None of the volunteers want a line (I know people that volunteer). The only encouragement they have in having a long line is that there is a well known way to be allowed to cut a line and that is to donate alcohol to the volunteers. But it isn't exactly hard to find free booze at Burning Man so not much of an incentive. This is mitigated by the fact that people are more likely to tip if the line is quick and the volunteers split the tips evenly (with the option to the volunteer to contribute that to the charity too).

    You would have to get Burning Man's permission to set up your own shop. They don't allow people to just set up shop and sell stuff at Burning Man. No way to purchase a vendor license, etc... In other words that isn't going to happen.

    But in short, the ice lines are not a problem. The only problem this year was that for about 4-5 hours only 1/3 of the locations could open because of mud. As soon as the others opened the problem resolved itself. I went for ice that day, saw the lines, and went back to camp. 3 other trips I waited in line for a max of 5 minutes.

  56. Obvious solutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure if it's kosher to use plastic at Burning man, but the most obvious solution is have everyone waiting in line pay while they are in line, and just have volunteers constantly handing out ice to everyone who paid in advance. Even without going the plastic route, they could have multiple volunteers that handle cash actually go down the line switching cash for a ice token, and then they just deposit/punch-a-hole-in the token at wherever to pick up the ice without having to needing to verify anything.

    Another solution is just to go the self-serve route entirely. This would require a bit more engineering on the part of who handles the ice, but in a sense, you know those ice-machines you see in hotels? Well scale that up, and put a few of them out there, and just go something like 3$ = one bucket or cooler of ice.

    Except you can buy the ice by the bag (crushed), by a 5 pack of bags (crushed), by the block, or by a 3 pack of blocks. Trying to do this hotel style would be insane. You have to remember that there is an ever present cloud of dust blowing around. Open ice, plus heat, plus dust = unappetizing.

  57. News for Nerds? by drachenfyre · · Score: 1

    More like "Bitching for hipsters". Seriously, this site continues to go down hill.

    1. Re:News for Nerds? by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      Hipsters don't exist. Are you a hipster?

  58. Just Don't Get Ice by Baby+Duck · · Score: 1

    Do you need ice to survive the desert?

    --

    "Love heals scars love left." -- Henry Rollins

  59. Who cares? by kf4lhp · · Score: 3, Insightful

    First world problems. Grow up.

    1. Re:Who cares? by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      It's true, economics is a first world problem. I'm not sure why doing things in an inefficient 3rd world way i "growing up". It seems like that would be the opposite.

  60. /. please add a filter by neo-mkrey · · Score: 3, Interesting

    so blog posts from Bennett Haselton are never seen by my eyes.

    1. Re:/. please add a filter by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

      Unlikely. He's probably entered a marketing agreement with dice.com for /. coverage.

    2. Re:/. please add a filter by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      Greasemonkey filter for you to enjoy:

      // ==UserScript==
      // @name Bennett Remover
      // @namespace kpt
      // @description Remove Bennett Haselton articles from Slashdot
      // @include http://slashdot.org/
      // @grant none
      // @require http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.6.2/jquery.min.js
      // ==/UserScript==
       
      var bad_articles = $("article").has("div:contains('Bennett Haselton')");
      bad_articles.remove();

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
  61. Eliminate the middle man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have the customers line up at the ice truck, rather than have someone carry the ice up-front all day.

    1. Re:Eliminate the middle man by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      At the ice truck? ARE YOU INSANE?

      That path leads to MADNESS!

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  62. That's a nice idea. by Minwee · · Score: 1

    I look forward to reading Bennett's article entitled "How I made Burning Man a more efficient place by selling ice out of the back of my own truck and then volunteering to direct traffic after" next September.

  63. This is all your fault... by dnebin · · Score: 2

    Seriously, if folks would just not post any sort of comment when this douche posts his blogs, they would axe him.

    To get him off the site, just boycott his opinions.

  64. Why not direct? Eliminate the ice line altogether by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Skip the staff handling ice at all. Allow customers to get their ice from the freezer directly after presenting a token/coupon/receipt that is purchased asynchronously elsewhere (or online?).

    Voila! No more lines at all!

    Well, if you allow a bunch of people in 110 degree heat in the middle of the desert to go into a freezer truck...it might be hard to get them back out quickly. And one should also remember that a lot of these people may be wearing no clothes (and I do mean *no* clothes, not minimal clothing). You want to take a chance that one leans up against ice you buy? And yes the volunteers are required to be clothed.

  65. Sounds like the "express line" at the bank by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where everyone still shows up and does whatever they want, and nobody calls them on it, or if they do it turns into a fight that slows everything down.

    There is no way to get people to have their money ready, hand it over, grab their product, and leave. It won't happen. if it would, it would be happening right now. But people are stupid. How many of them are simply high and watching things nobody else sees while they quietly drool and the ice guy is saying, "Can I help you? Can I help you?" How many are deep in a conversation or electronic gadget? How many start fumbling for change, drop everything, oh golly I have another nickel here somewhere?

    You know what would work? Public shame. Have the rudest jackholes possible working the ice line. If you don't have your money ready to go, they should scream at the idiot and kick them to the back of the line. "No soup for you!" Everyone else will learn quickly... move your ass, shut up, be ready, do your business, move along.

    I like the idea of an "express lane", where the ice costs more. If more people line up, the price goes up. When the line shrinks, lower it a little. That's the only way to have a true "express lane". But whiners will cry about "elitism" and "special access for the wealthy" and crap like that.

  66. Bennett solved the problem of waiting in line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    He didn't go. I loved this line:

    I skipped burning man this year but went for the first time in 2013.

    Wouldn't it be easier to say I went to burning man once in 2013? I went to Burning Man once after it got really popular and I solved all the problems.

    1. Re:Bennett solved the problem of waiting in line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what happens when douches who don't belong in the scene start going.

    2. Re:Bennett solved the problem of waiting in line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what happens when douches who don't belong in the scene start going.

      By "douches who don't belong in the scene", you mean "intelligent people that try to fix obvious problems that other douches are stupidly causing"?

    3. Re:Bennett solved the problem of waiting in line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you.

      I was going to say the exact same thing.

    4. Re:Bennett solved the problem of waiting in line by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Well, I've never even been and I skipped this year, too! :)

    5. Re:Bennett solved the problem of waiting in line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's pretty clear he's talking about Bennett Haselton.

  67. "Read on for the rest; Bennett's idea for..." by sootman · · Score: 1

    1600 words from The Man himself? SIGN ME UP! clickclickclickclickclickclickclickclickclick

    Seriously, if we had BH posts daily, that would be enough to push me to learn to write a greasemonkey script with regex to hide them.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  68. Automation by zerosomething · · Score: 1

    Automate it. Have fewer people feed bags of ice into the back side of vending machines hanging off the sides of the ice truck. You wouldn't even need much mechanical or electrical. You really only need an automated cash taker, change maker. Post the number of bags the customer wants inside the truck for someone to drop down a hopper. The number resets as bags drop down the chute until the right number is met. Next...

    --
    It all starts at 0
  69. In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Granola eating hippies are ineffective businessmen who are willing to tolerate losing customers to long wait times instead of increasing their efficiency/capacity because capitalism is evil... or something.

    If you want to do it better: do it better. You made your suggestion. As business owners it is their prerogative to leave money at the table.

    They probably have a fixed ice transport/storage capacity and don't care about their efficiency as long as they sell out every year. If they are still amortizing out their initial capital investments it may not make sense for them to increase their transport/storage capacity because of the associated risks of growing their businesses too quickly and over-leveraging themselves.

    Frankly, the lowest hanging fruit in my mind is hiring an additional cashier or doing what In & Out Burger does in California(another business that keeps their prices artificially low making demand excessive/long wait times) and have the cashier walk the line and sell "ice tokens" which simplifies the cash handling at the front counter and keeps the ice distribution as an uninterrupted continuous process.

    If you want Burning Man to be more efficient, ban hippies from attending since they are too busy smoking pot to care about things like "Lean" or profit maximization.

    The people selling ice are not capitalist or businessmen. They are essentially volunteers and any proceeds cover cost with the extra going to charity. There are normally 4-5 "cashiers" who do nothing but take money. They have someone greeting people and distributing them to the cashiers. Someone else grabs the ice and fills the order while the person takes the money. It really is pretty darn efficient. And it is as about as continuous a process as can be had.

    These comments from people who have never been to the event are really starting to make my brain hurt.

  70. Maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but there sure a lot of comments to the article. Meaning lots of click-throughs. So, Bennett seems to be doing his job just fine.

  71. I'm not sure where he is getting his timing from. by Valgar · · Score: 4, Informative

    DeathGuild/Thunderdome worked a shift at Arctica this year (and previous years).

    Basically it worked like this:

    1) Some of us are in the truck and are lining up bags of ice at the edge of the trailer (single bags, block ice, bags of 3, and full bags of 6)
    2) Customer approaches counter with dedicated cashier, announces what they need
    3) Dedicated Ice runner moves TEN FEET OR LESS to the trailer, grabs the ice and brings it to the front
    (Note for #3, the customer is still usually paying/receiving change by the time the ice is in front of them)
    4) Customer leaves, wash, rinse, repeat.

    That walk ALL the way back to the truck takes seconds, and the ice is there, right at the edge, and still being cooled to a degree by the trailer chillers, it takes them 15-20 seconds TOPS to get that ice. Each register also has a dedicated trailer (unless one is pulled for replacement with a new, full trailer). So what you are really saving is MAYBE 15 seconds or so per transaction, and then you have ice sitting out in 100+ degree heat.

    Don't forget if we want to put out the ice people need, we would need to have every possible combo of ice sitting out there, so if we get a run on single bags, those full bags and blocks would just sit there simmering until someone comes along that wants them. I think a bigger speed up for the lines would for people to have their money ready, and not dick around in their drug addled state when we ask them what they want.

  72. Regulatory Panic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It is common for vendors to blame the health authority for imagined regulations"

    Aand we call this regulatory panic, and it's easy to find examples of it from every country where the US political debates have had an influence in the public discussions and to the opinions of the actors in a private sector such as banking. Comic hysteria ensues also from exaggerated impacts of the real regulations.

  73. That just wasted my time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ..with the simplest (and not necessarily the best) possible solution to the problem, that is described in way too much detail.

    This whole piece could have been either:

    1) A paragraph long
    2) Far more innovative in approach, and therefore worth the time I just spent reading it.

  74. Typical Burning Man... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    A lot of people that show up are not prepared and mooch off of everyone in the name of "community"

    We would hide our resources and tell others "nope dont have any" on a lot of occasions and those we could tell were in real need and not just lazy potheads we would share.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  75. solution by BradMajors · · Score: 1

    Offer 100 bags of ice for $250. Problem solved.

  76. An Algorithm to End Burning Man... by Morpeth · · Score: 1

    ... THEN I'd be interested in the article.

    --

    'The unexamined life is not worth living' - Socrates
    1. Re:An Algorithm to End Burning Man... by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      ...hilarious

  77. rewind to the real problem by PhantomHarlock · · Score: 1

    Burning Man has created an artificial monopoly for ice. By the description it sounds much like bread lines in Russia. If you try to bottleneck and manage essential goods at a single source, it invariably gets unmanageable as it scales up. They're dealing with a pretty large population these days for a bunch of festival organizers.

    Based on the commenter who described the actual process via way of being a volunteer, a short term solution without getting into the political questions is to massively increase parallelism during peak times. Despite the pretty simple process, the peak demand is straining the system.

    If they kept statistics about load vs. time they could figure out easily when to have a whole bunch more labor present to get the job done more quickly for the throngs of thousands.

    1. Re:rewind to the real problem by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      I don't know what the bread lines in Russia were like. But I'm willing to wager it's not anything like that. I've been on more than a few ice runs, and it's fine. It might be able to be improved, but at no point was I feel like my survival was in question.

      They already have 3 locations, and they could presumably add more if they wanted.

  78. need strict ordering rules by clovis · · Score: 3, Funny

    ice vendor: What do you want?
    stoner: um ...
    ice vendor: No ice for you! Next!

  79. Queue theory in an profit driven world by fermion · · Score: 1
    As mentioned before, this problem has largely been solved. The constraints are not just waiting time, and waiting time is often the least of anyone problems. The elevator waiting time problem can, for example, be solved more efficiently with mirrors than by building more elevators. Waiting for a telephone operator is solved more efficiently with estimating time for wait and music than adding operators. So the question becomes is the line a problem to be solved, or only an issue for the stressed out suits who visit.

    First, it is arguable that at a a place like burning man which is allegedly a social event, the act of waiting in line is not in fact part of the stated purpose. I mean, where else do you get an opportunity to meet random like minded people. It is why waiting in line at whole foods is not big deal. It is really party time. Only overly introverted judgmental people get all stressed over it. If one is laid back and enjoying the groove, who cares?

    Likewise it is reasonable to ask whether profits would increase with more ice. The writeup postulates that there is a fixed costs to bringing in ice and that profit increases linearly for more ice sold. If this were true, then there would be more than three distribution points. So what is probably going on here is that paying people to drive and sell the ice would cost more than the profits to sell the ice if more trucks were brought in. Probably three trucks of ice is probably what is sold, and through most of the day the wait time is not an hour. Wait time would probably be reduced more by people choosing a different time to buy ice. It would probably be beneficial to track wait times during the day and see if it would be possible to even out the flow of people. If more ice is needed than is supplied, then add another truck and increase if necessary.

    Finally we have the cute idea of the volunteer. In the case of price gouging the last thing one want is an untrusted person dealing with the product. You might as well ask the drug dealers to have volunteers distribute the H. The marginal cost of a bag of ice is minimal, but the bags must be sold to cover the costs. If the situation is as dire as the poster suggests, there would be a large incentive for the volunteer to steal ice. Maybe each volunteer works an hour, and then thinks they are entitled to a couple free bags of ice. At minimum wage, the firm is not making any bargains off the situation.

    I know how these festivals go, and roughing it is hard, but that is why we were given granola, and way clavier is not suitable for every occasion.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  80. multiple lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the one bag line, the two bag line and the three bag line.

  81. superiority complex fault by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    I'd asked a handful of Burning Man veterans about this, and they said that Arctica had tried this at one point, but was required to stop by Nevada health code regulations, which treated ice as a "food product" and therefore said that it could not be moved out onto the counter until an order has been placed. This sounded puzzling to me...

    this is why i don't like Burning Man...

    1st problem is in bold...see, Burning Man is about overcomplicating and mystifying something to make it have social cachet...****ANYTIME**** you ask a question like this to a Burning Man veteran, you should expect a bullshit answer...somehow it will be bullshit

    2nd problem is in italics...the problem is not trusting your own common sense! obviously they are full of shit and just making stuff up to sound like they know what is going on

    in other words, the problem lies with the ice truck people ("Arctica")...they are just douchebags...they could try to make it better but they don't care....the problem with this system is that Burning Man as an event encourages this superiority complex mentality

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re:superiority complex fault by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      Arctica is a group of people volunteering to dispense ice at burning man.

      Feel free to keep disliking something you know nothing about.

  82. How about an insulated box at the counter? by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    Even if the Nevada health department DID have an objection, what's wrong with having some ice bags in an insulated box at the counter and calling THAT a "cooler" or "icebox"? It wouldn't need to be powered, because it would be kept cold by the steady flow of fresh bags from the supply truck.

    You'd have to run it as a FIFO, to avoid having bags sitting there for hours. (Bag porters put 'em in one end, clerks pull them out at the other - or put a moving partition in and run it as a circular buffer, so you don't have to slide them down. No additional communication between counter workers and bag-porters is necessary, because the available open space signals when more bags need to be toted. Only downside I see is that if/when the counter is about to close, you need to signal the porters to stop, to avoid having unsold bags in the cooler that need to be ported back to the truck to keep them from melting during the break.)

    Such a local buffer would do all you want, without leaving the ice bags sitting on a counter in the desert. Also: The ice would be seen by the customers to be fresh, rather than partially melted while waiting to be picked up.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:How about an insulated box at the counter? by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      The truck is a few feet away. If we are complaining about the time it takes to go from the truck to the counter, then we would be complaining about the time it takes to take the bags out of the counter cooler.

  83. Ice lines are a social good by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    And as the founder of the Ice Rustlers of the Open Playa, who helped lead deputized hobby horse riding citizens (many kids) to defend the Ice Bank from the Ice Rustlers of the Open Playa riding their hobby animals (unicorns, giraffes, and other creatures) with their wild and crazy hats, I remember fondly the agonized death scenes (perhaps a bit too overly dramatic) as they were stopped from stealing ice.

    Seriously, you guys are way too serious. Lines are part of the fun.

    If you want convenience and order, what the heck are you doing in the desert, you spoiled brat?

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  84. simple ice cest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not fill ice bag in a couple big ice chest at the counter?
    or having an order person walk down the line and get everyone order taking the order (15 people at a time)
    then go back and prefill the big ice chest for enough 15 orders?

  85. Let's properly define the problem by plopez · · Score: 2

    Problem: maximize profitability selling ice at a hippy poser wannabe festival. The constraints are:
    1) Users must be at least minimally satisfied. No shouting, cursing, "line rage", or riots. The user must get a reasonable product with an acceptable wait time at an acceptable cost. The process should seem fair.
    2) Costs must be minimized these include:
          a) cost of labor, this is probably the biggest cost
          b) materials cost, waste from melting ice must be minimized
          c) transportation and storage costs. No constant shuttling to and from the supplier who may be 100 KM away. Some transportation costs may actually amount to labor costs,e.g. the cost of a driver.
    3) regulatory compliance cost mostly health and sanitation.
    4) Losses due to theft must be minimal. This sort of implies cash on hand must be minimal. Higher sales may require banks drops for security reasons.

    Let's begin...

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  86. Free Market Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh.. How about competition instead?

  87. Even better --- by BryanJohnson2615 · · Score: 1

    Customers are bottlenecks too, so you must take into account that as well. There is a faster way to parallel process knowing this: You send two people down the row of customers to take orders and give tickets to those who are ready (the first person takes everyone who is ready with cash the moment they are approached - while the 2nd employee catches those who are a bit slower / using cards) and when the line is traversed, go back to do other duties (ice fetching/accounting etc) OR leave that person deep in the line (think McDonalds 2 window system). You have one person constantly fetching ice (they can trade to avoid fatigue), you have one person to verify the tickets and allow the bag transfer. Rinse-repeat. This is why I'm a computer scientist who does business, there is always a better algorithm than the competition.

  88. A Long Line for a Shorter Wait at the Supermarket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/23/business/23checkout.html?_r=0

  89. What the f*ck is "Burning Man"? by Ignatius · · Score: 1

    ... and wouldn't selling ice not defy the very purpose of the event?

    ignatius

  90. The Toyota Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "In a previous article I'd theorized about an algorithm for speeding up the vehicle exodus at Burning Man. (Basically, have a "priority lane" where cars can exit at different times of day, depending on the last character on their license plate."
    Gasp... priority lanes don't work.
    This has been shown many times and this kind of problem is well known to practitioners of LEAN manufacturing (also health care, airlines and grocery stores etc).
    The solution to the problem of wait-times (one of the 8 deadly wastes) was worked out in the 1950s without the use of iAnythings.

    BTW airline ticket counters use LEAN methods to keep the customer "flowing" to their destination, so they have a single line and multiple agents. Contrast this with grocery stores who do not want you to pass through too quickly because they want you to stand in line long enough to buy a magazine and a pack of gum, so they have multiple line-ups which you can't escape from, and a priority line to make people think they are trying to be efficient. ...and I agree with other comments here that a) why blog here? and b) getting ice in the desert is more about planning ahead.

  91. Re:What the actual fuck is this article going on a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, how is this news? This is some guy's heat stress-induced hallucination fixation about carrying ice around a desert.

    Careful, whole religions have sprung up from such humble beginnings.

  92. So simple by Skynyrd · · Score: 1

    Don't buy ice at peak times.

    For fuck's sake, Burning Man is about self reliance. Sp rather than be an adult, and deal with his ice chest in the early morning late at night, or some other time with low lines he wants to change the system to suit him.

    He simply doesn't understand the event. And guys like him are part of the reason I no longer go.

  93. Dear Burner noob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Written in the style of a jaded Burner who wants to help noobs be less annoying, rather than typical /. prose.

    You are witnessing the power of an abusive monopoly. You have SO MANY GOOD IDEAS for fixing this, but yet Arctica has close to zero reasons to listen to you.

    In a capitalist society you could respond by raising capitol and opening a competitor, but at Burning Man that path is blocked to you (with one exception, you can open your own ice distributor there, as long as you don't charge for the product).

    Capitalism teaches us that we can optimize this for greater worker productivity, but think about what this means in practice: volunteers spending more of their day standing in the sun, and less of their day visiting the cool truck.

    This would obviously be more convenient for you, but here's the thing: NOBODY CARES! If after spending an hour in line for ice you decide to whine about it to the UNPAID VOLUNTEER who is serving you, they can tell you to go to the back of the line and be more polite next time. As I said, an abusive monopoly.

    Think of it as "the volunteer is always right". If you don't like it, take the excellent advice you quoted AND BRING YOUR OWN!

    There are other strategies for dealing with this. You can have getting ice as a rotating chore at your camp. You can decide the person with the getting ice chore is going to be flaky and not even show up in camp until 3pm, and do it yourself. You can bring a fridge and a generator and fill the freezer with bacon and otter pops (which is what my most recent camp did). You can also do what I've started doing and not bring anything that needs to be kept cold.

    TL:DR: Ideas are cheap. Volunteer at Arctica and change it from the inside.

  94. Re:this. Selling goods efficiently is business,nhi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would it be popular? America has drastically increased the productivity per worker while driving down real pay for everyone except those at the top. Not really the model Burning Man tries to imitate.

  95. two points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is the distance to the truck door and sales counter not minimized if that's the only thing they sell?

  96. What about the obvious answer? by istartedi · · Score: 1

    What about the obvious answer--moving the cash box right up to the back of the truck. Have one volunteer taking the money, the other in the truck skidding the ice out on a dolly. It's not like labor costs are a concern? Volunteers! No pay. Take two. Also, person in truck literally has the coolest job at BM. I bet a lot of people would want to do that.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  97. Noob burner making obvious suggestions by dentin · · Score: 1

    Bennett, please just shut the fuck up about your improvements to burning man. For your traffic flow 'improvement', you notably didn't provide simulations, suggested a broken alternative, and didn't even bother to fully understand the situation before jumping in with both feet. For this one, you've done something similar.

    In particular, the problem when the ice line is backed up is -not- because the ice wasn't prefetched. It's because half the time they can't get it out of the trucks any faster, and half the time they can't get the customers out of the way faster. Adding prefetch to a throughput bound system does not improve performance. If you had the experience of going through the lines more than a few times, you'd have maybe picked up on that before offering your advice.

    I'm not going to say that traffic isn't a problem, or that ice queues aren't stupidly long at times. But these are hard problems, and they have been thought about extensively by smarter people than you, smarter people who have more information and experience than you. You insult all of them by discounting that so blatantly.

    --
    Alter Aeon Multiclass MUD - http://www.alteraeon.com
  98. pipelining by bobfandango · · Score: 1

    Assuming ice production is not the bottleneck, then taking money and making change certainly is... Eliminating the ice transfer from truck to counter, even if it only saves 15 seconds per customer, would be significant. Given these facts, I thought the "algorithm" would obviously be pipelining.... like McDonald's drive thru. One queue feeds multiple cashiers to take money and give tickets, tokens or other proof of purchase... The cashier lines feed into one or more ice lines that terminate exactly at the back of the truck. You give over your ticket and then YOU pick up the ice and take it away. The ice only ever moves from the back of the truck to the front. Large truck could probably serve 2 pickup lines at the tailgate. It should not be too difficult to make moving the ice from the back of the truck to the front your bottleneck.

    1. Re:pipelining by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      This is a way better solution than Bennett's. Good job Bob :)

  99. exactly. arithmetic by raymorris · · Score: 1

    Exactly, that's precisely what the majority of stoned people at Burning Man will say. Of course, that's because they aren't so good at arithmetic and even worse at history. Since 1967, when the census bureau began tracking it, there has been exactly one instance of real median income falling over any five year period. That's the last five years. Every other period in American history has seen median incomes are increase. It's just these last five years that Damon republican in the Whitehouse has fucked it all up.

    Your parents and grandparents actually worked, hard, in the heat, to afford an 800 square foot home. Today's young leftist mooches live in their parent's 800 square foot basement, working part time and complaining about how tough it is.

        Get off my lawn - or mow it. The Mexican who came to my door unable to speak English couple of years ago pushing a broken down mower now arrives in a $30,000 dually. Because he worked for it.

  100. Mickie Dees, 2014 by Latent+Heat · · Score: 1
    I had the impression that McDonalds serves customers at an order-of-magnitude greater rate than just about any other fast-food chain, accounting for Warren Buffett getting rich off their corporate stock?

    There is no "line" at McDonalds, there is simply a mob of customers, some of them waiting for their order, some of them staring at the menu-on-the-wall not knowing what to order, and some eager to purchase something and eat. Somehow that mob is self-organizing and the servers are able to "Can I help you?" the next person without a line and without starting a riot.

    The one time that didn't work is when I was on a long drive returning from visiting my parents in "long-term care", and as I came up to the counter to open my mouth with my order, a group of people from what looked like a middle-school sports team after a game simply surged passed me, as much as pushing me aside. Didn't say anything but from my scowl, one of them remarked, "I bet that 'dude' is upset" only in somewhat more vulgar terms. I think I said something that I had a 'long day', was very tired and hungry beyond belief, but it didn't look like I was getting anything to eat anytime soon, I turned and left.

    Before someone lectures me about my sense of entitlement, that was probably an epic fail of this "store" from their training at Hamburger U. I don't stop there but instead patronize another McDonalds a little further up the road with which I have good experience.

    1. Re: Mickie Dees, 2014 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wtf you passive pussy! Why didn't you say nah fuck that, push them out of your way and order? Grow a pair!

    2. Re: Mickie Dees, 2014 by Latent+Heat · · Score: 1

      Yes, I am supposed to beat up some (rude) children . . .

  101. FRRe: Agner Krarup Erlang - The telephone in 1909! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is exactly how the Silicon Valley standby Fry's electronics works. The line can be really really long but this queue feeds 20 to 30 cashiers and there's someone who almost speaks English on point at the end of the line to tell you which green light has just turned on over the checkout.
        seems to work pretty well
        same doesn't apply to the "security" guy who implies you are a shop lifter as you walk out with your stuff. or to the fun people you deal with to return something obvious resold opened after being returned broken. but hey -- you are shopping at Frys! :)

  102. another algorithm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    don't go to burning man unless you love waiting in lines.

  103. Priorities by MatheoDJ · · Score: 1

    It's not really a huge priority to make the ice experience easier. If people could swoop through like McDonald's, there would be a lot more waste... a certain fraction of the BRC population has more money than sense, and we don't want to see ice all over the playa. Everybody has to wait in line, which is a nice equalizer. It keeps everything a little cleaner, and people often remark about how much fun they have in the ice line... you meet people there that you wouldn't necessarily bump into anywhere else on the playa.

  104. Re:What the actual fuck is this article going on a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nailed it. /thread

  105. Yeah by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

    i have a solution.
    test bombs on burning man.
    everyone wins.

    1. Re:Yeah by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      Everyone wins if we tested bombs on you too.

  106. article summary by binarstu · · Score: 1

    Here is a quick summary of the main ideas in the article:

    Every time a customer purchases ice at Burning Man, a volunteer must walk to the ice truck, retrieve the ice bags, and bring them to the customer. This wastes time because each customer must wait for his or her ice to be retrieved from the truck. Transactions that require returning change to the customer also take extra time. Therefore, the ice purchasing process would be faster if a) the ice were already at the counter so the customer could pick it up immediately, and b) there were a “turbo line” for people who don't need change. Some nonexperts that BH talked to thought that Nevada health regulations might prohibit a), but they do not.

    That's just over 100 words. Does using 1700+ words to communicate these relatively simple ideas really help anyone understand them better?

  107. False "Solution" Ignores the real problem by Midnight_Falcon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Bennett went to Burning Man once in 2013 and now thinks he's somehow relevant to Burning Man and writes about it online more than many core community members who actually get stuff done. His one experience with Burning Man was as little more than an ancillary helper at a smallish camp. His bold "solution" to this problem actually ignores the key issue that workers are not moving fast because there is no motivation to sell more ice.

    The reason the ice line moves so slowly is everyone is a VOLUNTEER and they are not paid to sell ice. They just get a free ticket working for Arctica. They're also stoned, and burnt out, and aren't really concerned about moving fast in the high heat of the day to get people more ice. If they just get through their shift, they're happy -- people waiting is not a concern.

    The solution Bennett should be looking for should not be some magic "algorithm," but a political one involving staff being paid more and being hired for merit, rather than knowing someone in Arctica. His attachment to this idea and even stating that there are no counter-arguments shows his inexperience and cursory knowledge about Burning Man in general. Technically, his idea might work, socially, it'll never happen.

    As far as I know, Bennett's social connections to Burning Man are very limited, so this would be something that flies above his head. Burning Man is predominately, a social event, and technical/algorithm solutions ignore the fact that the reason most core contributors are there is for social reasons.

  108. Two-Stage Checkout by W.+Justice+Black · · Score: 1

    Have a token- or ticket-based approach:

    1. If you don't have a token/ticket (or need to buy more), there's one line for that.
    2. Folks with tokens hand 'em over in exchange for bags, preferably right at the truck so no fetching (you effectively crowdsource that bit).

    Money is separate from the actual moving of product then (have to do the whole "no refunds/no cash value" thing on the tokens). For people that pre-buy tokens, the line will be lightning fast. For everyone else, it'll still be faster than before and you can flow people to the registers or to pickup as needed to deal with demand.

    --
    "Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana." --Groucho Marx
  109. CS Perspective on Improvements. by ttucker · · Score: 1

    The bag on the counter technique provides a time complexity improvement on the scale of O(1)... probably safe to ignore. Forcing people to complete the transactions faster is probably not practical, so the only way to increase throughput is to have more cashier stations.

  110. The only winning move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is to not go to Burning Man.

    If you're pretentious enough to think that pile of crap is for you, you deserve every bit of inconvenience you receive while there.

  111. Form letter by mjwx · · Score: 1

    Dearest Bennett Hasselton,

    Your idea to shorten lines will not work because of the following reasons:

    (X) People aren't logical or rational.

    Thank you and have a pleasant day.
    Reality

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  112. what a shitty algorithm fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The blindingly obvious inefficiency is the backtracking through the crowd once you've made your purchase. How about queueing to the side, passing the counter and paying, taking your receipt / stamp to the ice truck and grabbing the number of bags yourself? Let each customer do the walk in one direction, rather than your few staff repeatedly walking both (and leaving their post at the sales desk).

  113. first mistake, ice? by confused+one · · Score: 1

    So, you go to an event in the desert, and you expect to be able to buy ice? Why are you depending on ice in the first place. WTF people? It's hot and it's dry; that's why it's called a desert for fuck's sake. Learn a little independence and self reliance.

  114. Inventory Management? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    Never been to burning man, but why so many different products? I'd think that single bags of ice would be suitable for pretty much any purpose the ice is needed for even if not ideal for some purposes. Why not just sell singles and one size of bundles.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    1. Re:Inventory Management? by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      Cubes melt faster than blocks. Some people want to make stuff cold fast. Some people want to make stuff cold for a longer period of time.

      The large bags of ice are just six small bags in a bigger bag. So in a sense they do only sell one size, but they have bulk pricing for groups of 6 bags.

  115. Economic problem, not algorithmic` by WinkingChicken · · Score: 1

    The problem is that ice vending is a monopoly, so ice vendor employs monopoly tactitics. Since customers can't buy anywhere else, the vendor could not care less about inconveniencing them - they can't buy from another supplier.

    Solution is to have more than 3 independent vendors, and BM sets the pice. Vendors will compete on service for sales - fastest server will prevail. The vendor that just takes customers' money and lets customer pick their own ice up from the truck will be fastest.

    First-world problem solved.

  116. I don't work for the store! by Zynder · · Score: 1

    Nice jab at American bashing, he who has a withered up staff (pretty sure we make a pill for that, just sayin), but there is one clear and simple reason that I hate systems like this and the self checkouts Walmart now employs: I'M NOT A WALMART EMPLOYEE! Don't ask me to do your job. If you need me to do everything in the store for you, because you are a cheap ass CEO, then why am I even coming through your doors? I'm buying damned near everything now via Amazon and it works out fine. Anything that I have to have right this minute can be bought at one of the smaller chains or the mom-and-pop grocers even if it is a bit higher in price because "fuck you, that's why". It is just one more symptom of the endemic problem with corporate cost cutting that I just can't stand. Those CEOs need bigger bonuses so little Jenny can have that new Maserati and all the poor folks can go die in the ditch.

    1. Re:I don't work for the store! by witherstaff · · Score: 1

      Old RPG nick aside, I'm an American so I think my comment would be more self deprecating on a country wide scale. Having grown up around a family business I stopped being surprised at what wouldn't be stolen out of a retail store. I live in a farming area with many 'on your honor' farm stands. Take produce from the stand and leave money in a coffee can type setups. People steal the money cans on a regular enough basis. For these reasons and more I couldn't imagine letting people scan their products when they put things in a cart and it not being massively abused. I'd be overjoyed to be proven wrong.

      I agree with you on the self checkouts. While they're sometimes quick for a handful of items, If it's more than a few items then you should get a discount equal to an employee's wage. BUT I'm all for scanning an object when I put it in the cart and just paying for it when I leave, no double handling of products by putting in the cart, taking out to be scanned, putting back in the cart. Almost walking right out the door after finding what I wanted was very quick.

    2. Re:I don't work for the store! by deroby · · Score: 1

      Talking to a supermarket employee a while back (Delhaize,Belgium) it seems that ever since they introduced the self-scanning system (which is voluntarily btw, you can still use the 'normal' cashiers if you prefer) the internal stock is much more consistent. Or in other words, a lot less gets stolen ever since.
      She couldn't quite explain why this was but it was remarkable. We kind of agreed that it might be because thieves will avoid these shops because they fear there must now be a a lot more (hidden) cameras, security tags, etc around the shop to stop people from cheating, but apparently in reality no such changes were introduced.

      Personally I like using the self-scanning because the scanner will display me the price of things, 'warn' me if there are special offers ("buy 2 get 3"), shows the total price, etc... That said, it does bring a bit of extra stress along, especially when you get one of those random checks and somehow you automatically fear you must have missed something and will get caught! It only happened to me once and I was actually quite embarrassed about it although it had been an honest mistake. As a result, whenever I think I screwed up nowadays and it's simply too much work to start verifying the number of items in my cart vs the number indicated on the scanner I'll simply go via the normal cashier and have them (re)scan it for me.

      PS: They tried to introduce the single-queue to many cashiers thing a while back in some Carrefours here but people simply didn't like it. I'm guessing it works best if the shop has some kind of big lane that fans out at the end?! In my case people were gathered in a central spot and then had to go to whatever mini-queue they got assigned. It simply didn't feel efficient even though it might have been. Luckily the self-scanning queue wasn't involved in the experiment =)

      --
      If there is one thing to be learned on slashdot, it has to be sarcasm.
  117. How does this help? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, how does that even help? The bag is there up at the counter... but the guy still has to grab the next one before he can take money? doesn't make sense.... Should just park the ice truck closer....

  118. What if they made the ice really, really cold by tgibson · · Score: 1

    That would probably be the best solution.

  119. I don't care about Burning Man by rebelwarlock · · Score: 1

    I'm just here to read the comments about what an utter piece of shit Bennet Hasselhoff is. Seriously, Ben 10 is the least qualified person to write about anything. I'd rather ask a hobo for advice, because at least then I'd be asking and not assaulted with random horseshit from Chris Benoit.

  120. What if you want to wait in line? by maas15 · · Score: 1

    Have you considered that you may risk depriving people of the line for ice? I don't think it's a bad thing!

  121. turd burglar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the real problem is that burning man is fucking gay

  122. A Long Line for a Shorter Wait at the Supermarket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/23/business/23checkout.html?_r=0

    This article seems relevent. Whole Foods has solved this problem.

  123. A better algorithm - How PENNSIC does it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the ice corral, there are many big heavily insulated ice chillers full of ice. They are marked with very large numbers.

    At one side of the ice corral, there are giant trucks delivering ice.

    At the other side, there's a set of cash registers.

    People go to the cash register, pay the nice old ladies for however much ice they want, they are told which numbered chillers to use, then they walk to the appropriate chillers and get their ice, then they walk out past the eagle eyes of the ladies who know what they are supposed to be carrying.

    The only staff carrying ice are the ones taking it from the trucks and placing it in the chillers. The ice ladies do not send customers to the chillers currently being filled, so there is no conflict with or waiting for the truck people.

    I imagine a few people do steal ice, but remember most of the rest of the people present at Pennsic would act to stop it if they saw anyone stealing. It's that kind of crowd (perhaps BM is not? I dunno).

    This solution leaves the ice in the chillers until it's purchased, and removes the need for staff to leave the registers.

  124. You assumed they dont care about iceline wait time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because you still sell the same number of ice bags, but you've eliminated the pointless deadweight loss of all the time the customers were previously wasting in line.

    But if you do that an assassin will find you at 4 in the morning and kill you with a poisoned devil's horns ring.

  125. Re:this. Selling goods efficiently is business,nhi by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

    How many times have you been to burning man?

  126. Re:Economic problem, not algorithmic` by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

    It's not a monopoly. There are no vendors. The people distributing the ice are volunteers.

    Even if there were a traditional profit driven vendor for the ice, he would still have an incentive to sell all the ice as quickly as possible and GTFO, because he wouldn't have to pay his workers for as many hours and pay to have the truck refrigerated for as long.

  127. be less willing to put up with inefficiency by supernova87a · · Score: 1

    The thing I hate the most in the world is stupid lines making people physically wait and waste their time for something. Especially when there don't need to be lines, and the problem is caused by dumb behavior, not genuine lack of resources (aside from intelligence).

    Have a look at this video, which shows how Toyota helped apply pretty simple principles to reduce the wait for food after disaster hit with Hurricane Sandy in NYC. https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    You start understanding that the average person in charge of group processes generally have no idea how much of people's time they're wasting. Which could be avoided with some simple steps, and very little additional cost.

    1. Re:be less willing to put up with inefficiency by romons · · Score: 1

      Thanks for posting this. Very cool video.

      --
      Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company -- Mark Twain
  128. volunteers can be douchebags by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    doesn't matter if they're volunteers...but thanks for confirming for everyone that my first point was accurate, while simultaneously *contributing nothing* to the actual conversation

    1st problem is in bold...see, Burning Man is about overcomplicating and mystifying something to make it have social cachet...****ANYTIME**** you ask a question like this to a Burning Man veteran, you should expect a bullshit answer...somehow it will be bullshit

    Arctica is a group of people volunteering to dispense ice at burning man.

    Feel free to keep disliking something you know nothing about.

    So, how does the fact that "Arctica" uses volunteers negate the point I made here:

    in other words, the problem lies with the ice truck people ("Arctica")...they are just douchebags...**they could try to make it better but they don't care**....the problem with this system is that Burning Man as an event encourages this superiority complex mentality

    Nothing you said addresses that at all...

    They can be volunteers and still douchebags...the point is it's obvious they could do it faster but they dont care

    which i feel confirms my theory about Burning Man, as does your last comment

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re:volunteers can be douchebags by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      doesn't matter if they're volunteers...but thanks for confirming for everyone that my first point was accurate, while simultaneously *contributing nothing* to the actual conversation

      I don't see how anything I said lead to anything being more mystified.

      So, how does the fact that "Arctica" uses volunteers negate the point I made here:

      in other words, the problem lies with the ice truck people ("Arctica")...they are just douchebags...**they could try to make it better but they don't care**....the problem with this system is that Burning Man as an event encourages this superiority complex mentality

      Pretty obvious. Because if they didn't care, they could simply not volunteer? The whole point of volunteering is to make something better than it would be if you didn't.

      Nothing you said addresses that at all...

      They can be volunteers and still douchebags...the point is it's obvious they could do it faster but they dont care

      You have no fucking clue.

      which i feel confirms my theory about Burning Man, as does your last comment

      If your theory is that everyone is an asshole, and you test it by acting like an asshole to everyone, then it shouldn't be a surprise that your "theory is confirmed".

      I'm going to propose a new theory for you. If it seems like everyone else is an asshole, maybe you are the asshole.

  129. I have a better solution by romons · · Score: 1

    It costs $420 a person to go to burning man. There were nearly 70,000 people there in 2013. By charging people an additional $20, the management would have an additional 1.4 million dollars to buy a fleet of 20 ice trucks, and give out ice for free at 20 locations. They could sell the ice trucks after the event, or just store them until next year.

    In fact, I could do this, and make my fortune. Pre-sell "ice passes" for $30 that would entitle the holder to free ice at any ice truck.

    Just pre-queueing the ice makes sense too, but having more locations means you don't have to walk as far, or wait as long. Having 20 locations means a 10 minute walk, and a 0 minute wait for most people at most times.

    --
    Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company -- Mark Twain
  130. From an Arctica Volunteer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been to Burning Man five times. One year, the people in the ice queue were asked if anyone wanted to volunteer to work in the truck (without compensation). It's Burning Man and people are helpful so two of us jumped at the chance to assist. It was nice to get out of the sun, work in an ice truck for a few hours, and meet some cool people (no pun intended). The lines moved very quickly because there were three jobs: taking the money, retrieving ice from the truck, and moving ice within the truck. There were no problem and it's not a complicated system that requires a algorithmic change -- you just need people to help, be organized, and everything is hunky-dory. The wonderful people at Arctica were genuinely nice, thanksful, hard-working, and sincerely cared about the wait times (hence, the call-out for volunteers). A better algorithm improvement is something like this: If then . After our shift we were pretty exhausted from moving the ice but it was well worth it; we had another random experience of fun and cooperation at Burning Man.

  131. not two options_false choice by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    Pretty obvious. Because if they didn't care, they could simply not volunteer? The whole point of volunteering is to make something better than it would be if you didn't.

    false choice....it's not a binary...it's not a choice between only either a) not volunteer or b) get ice slowly and not improve the system

    those are not the only two options

    the volunteers should try TFA's idea without a big hassle or drama...they should WELCOME a solution that makes it faster...and so should YOU

    you really are continuing to prove my point with all this

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re:not two options_false choice by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      false choice....it's not a binary...it's not a choice between only either a) not volunteer or b) get ice slowly and not improve the system

      I never implied anything was binary. There are many choices. They could care a lot, they could care a little, or they could not care at all, and everything in between. What I suggested was that they at least care enough to volunteer.

      It was you who suggested the extreme option that they don't care at all.

      the volunteers should try TFA's idea without a big hassle or drama...they should WELCOME a solution that makes it faster...and so should YOU

      I'm sure they have tried it, along with lots of other ideas. Burning man is a place with a lot of smart people continuously trying new ideas. I am not saying that the process can't be improved. I am saying that the characterization of the current process by the OP is not accurate. The workers are already working in parallel, so getting the ice after the order is made doesn't slow anything down as long as it isn't slower than the transaction of money on average.

      I think there probably exists even better ways of doing the ice line than what Bennett suggests. Some of those suggestions occurred right in this comments section. As someone who has personally witnessed the ice line several times over 6 years, and as a software engineer with 10 years experience, I can confidently say that Bennett's assessment of the problem and his solution are flawed.

      You really are continuing to prove my point with all this

      But that's not even what this is about. What this is about is someone (you) who *really* has no fucking clue what he's talking about, trying to pretend like he does. At least Bennett has been to burning man once, and is trying to make things better (along with most people who go to burning man).

      You are someone who (I will assume) has been to burning man 0 times, who has heard how the ice line works from someone who has been once.

      There are some douchebags at burning man. Most of the people are really intelligent, thoughtful and kind. Labelling volunteers you've never met, at an event you've never been to, as douchebags makes you a douchebag.

      If you ever come to burning man. Please don't be a douchebag.

  132. infinitely proving my point recursively by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    I'm sure they have tried it, along with lots of other ideas.

    except if you read TFA, it's clear the author asked about it and was told it was a "food safety issue" which he checked on and found to be untrue

    But that's not even what this is about. What this is about is someone (you) who *really* has no fucking clue what he's talking about, trying to pretend like he does.

    again...you ARE indeed proving my point, that Burners like you who over-mystify something just to feel 'cool' and 'in the know' are the problem, pasted below from my OP comment:

    ...the problem with this system is that Burning Man as an event encourages this superiority complex mentality

    and you did just that in the quoted portion above

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re:infinitely proving my point recursively by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      except if you read TFA, it's clear the author asked about it and was told it was a "food safety issue" which he checked on and found to be untrue

      Ice is not dispensed by one person. It's dispensed by lots of volunteers at 3 different locations every day during the event over many years. I'm sure some probably do think it's a government rule. Not every volunteer is perfectly informed. This isn't relevant to the point that I am making about you.

      again...you ARE indeed proving my point, that Burners like you who over-mystify something just to feel 'cool' and 'in the know' are the problem, pasted below from my OP comment:

      Why are you trying to pretend to know about things that you don't? Are you just trying to feel "cool"?

      Regardless of whether you like me or I like you, the fact is that I AM in the know (at least much more than you), because I actually witnessed the phenomenon in question. Normally there can be some debate over whether "experts" actually know anymore. I am not even claiming to be an expert. I am claiming that you know next to nothing, and the experience that I have (which I am not suggesting is comprehensive), as WAY MORE than what you have (which is none).

      ...the problem with this system is that Burning Man as an event encourages this superiority complex mentality

      Not only does Burning man as an event not encourage this, but stating facts is not evidence of a superiority complex.

      My advice to you is to know at least a little about a subject before trying to feign expertise. Or better yet, don't even try to feign expertise. It is possible to have a discussion about something without pretending to be an expert on it.

    2. Re:infinitely proving my point recursively by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      the people should WANT suggestions for improvement, and the response TFA author got indicates a "superiority complex" mentality

      Even if we assume that the few people that Bennett talked to actually had a superiority complex and didn't care at all to improve things (which I think is a crazy assumption to make without more evidence), it really doesn't do anything to prove that this is a mentality that permeates and is perpetuated by the burning man event as a whole.

      this is correct, and no matter what your experience you cannot contradict it, given what you have indicated

      I never claimed that *all* of burning man is good or bad. You are the one claiming that burning man as a whole has a superiority complex and doesn't care about improving anything, is perfectly contradicted by my experiences. Because when you make sweeping generalizations, all it takes are individual examples to disprove them.

      they should welcome suggestions, TFA author was not welcomed and was instead give a line of BS

      By one or possibly 2 people, who may themselves have been misinformed. I think it's great that he tried to get to the bottom of it. Maybe it will turn out to be some misunderstanding at bruning man org that Bennett has just uncovered. Maybe it will turn out that someone working in the government misinformed burning man about the rules.

      the fact that you think that b/c you were in the ice line once makes any of the above not correct **shows that Burners and Burning Man is about demonstrating abstract superiority**

      I was in several ice lines over several years. I've been in long ice lines. short ice lines. I've been in ice lines where the volunteers were working very efficiently, and in ice lines where they were not so efficient. I don;t have a superiority "complex". My knowledge about the reality of the subject is objectively superior to yours.

      What you don't seem to understand is that it is not rational to apply the traits of one individual to an entire group. You meet one burner with a superiority complex, and you assume every burner has a superiority complex. You read one story about a person X who tried to improve the ice line at burning man and was maybe given a bit of a run around by person Y, and you assume that everyone at burning man is just like the person Y you imagined. Not only is your perception of person Y probably wrong, even if it was right, that application of his/her traits to all of burning man is *definitely* wrong.

      they should welcome suggestions, TFA author instead was treated insultingly and rudely....ACCEPT THIS FACT

      People at burning man do welcome suggestions. Not everyone welcomes suggestions, but most do. Even I welcomed his suggestion, and offered a few of my own. The author may have been treated rudely.

      The fact that one person was insulting and rude at burning man does not mean that rudeness and insulting people are encouraged at burning man, regardless of whether Bennett was actually insulted or treated rudely.

      You are treating all of burning man with rudeness. Should I assume that your whole family, or that all your friends would also be prejudiced assholes too?

    3. Re:infinitely proving my point recursively by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      You understand you are confirming my theory right? (i.e. the one where you acting like an asshole to everyone elicits the same response?)

      You already should have known this was true.

      And in regards to the superiority complex. It may seem that everyone is acting trying to superior to you, but when you actively try to remain ignorant, it's just that you are ensuring that most everyone will actually know more than you.

      I didn't try to "mystify" anything. Are you really that mystified by the idea that learning about a topic rather than just assuming you already know is a sure fire way to look like an idiot? Are you really that mystified that being an asshole will not make people want to treat you with any kind of respect?

      Maybe you should work on being a better person, because the problem is clearly you.

  133. infinitely proving my point recursively by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    you can chase rhetorical circles all you want but you cannot address this fact:

    the people should WANT suggestions for improvement, and the response TFA author got indicates a "superiority complex" mentality

    this is correct, and no matter what your experience you cannot contradict it, given what you have indicated

    they should welcome suggestions, TFA author was not welcomed and was instead give a line of BS

    the fact that you think that b/c you were in the ice line once makes any of the above not correct **shows that Burners and Burning Man is about demonstrating abstract superiority**

    they should welcome suggestions, TFA author instead was treated insultingly and rudely....ACCEPT THIS FACT

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
  134. infinitely proving my point recursively by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    except it's not "just" one of anything....not one rude experience, not one asshat Burner (you), not just one example

    given what was described, your behavior here, and the Burners I've known, comparing to other festivals I've been to (Rainbow Gathering, Bonaroo, several others), AND other articles about Burning Man on slashdot there is no other conclusion to make

    Burning Man encourages people to act with a "superiority complex"

    It's baked-in to the event...ask anyone "What is Burning Man" and you can usually see the artificial scarcity of knowledge used as a way to demonstrate your superiority over others on full display....you mystify it to make you "cool" and have artificial superiority to "noobs"...it's all a game for your ego

    you understand you're confirming my theory with every post you type, right?

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
  135. personal attacks vs logic by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    you've got nothing but personal attacks and unfalsifiable claims to support your contentions

    none of your counterpoints attack my logic or offer a falsifiable counterpoint

    everything you've typed here is just random rhetoric to support your ego

    if you has a logical counter to my argument you would have used it by now...

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re:personal attacks vs logic by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      you've got nothing but personal attacks and unfalsifiable claims to support your contentions

      It's not my fault if you can't read.

      none of your counterpoints attack my logic or offer a falsifiable counterpoint

      Your original claim is unfalsifiable in that it is subjective.

      everything you've typed here is just random rhetoric to support your ego

      another unfalsifiable claim...

      if you has a logical counter to my argument you would have used it by now...

      Your skewed opinion of what is and is not logical is less than worthless.

      Please don't pretend to be some kind of logic expert now. It will just make you look even dumber and feel the need to further project superiority complexes on everyone else.

  136. infinitely proving my point recursively by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    n/t

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
  137. They do try to stop self service theft. by jcrb · · Score: 1

    With various approaches but its not clear that they are so successful. Your particular conversation sounds like it may have been an outlier.
    http://www.smartplanet.com/blo...
    http://tvnz.co.nz/national-new...
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...

    --
    -jon
  138. Hello by mayjustlikethemonth · · Score: 1

    Very Nice Story the Regardless of the conditions