Slashdot Mirror


Hungary To Tax Internet Traffic

An anonymous reader writes: The Hungarian government has announced a new tax on internet traffic: 150 HUF ($0.62 USD) per gigabyte. In Hungary, a monthly internet subscription costs around 4,000-10,000 HUF ($17-$41), so it could really put a constraint on different service providers, especially for streaming media. This kind of tax could set back the country's technological development by some 20 years — to the pre-internet age. As a side note, the Hungarian government's budget is running at a serious deficit. The internet tax is officially expected to bring in about 20 billion HUF in income, though a quick look at the BIX (Budapest Internet Exchange) and a bit of math suggests a better estimate of the income would probably be an order of magnitude higher.

21 of 324 comments (clear)

  1. Nah, this is just stage 1 by halivar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -- Ronald Reagan

    1. Re:Nah, this is just stage 1 by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 4, Informative

      Orban's regime borders on fascism, I wouldn't call it a democracy. His policies are a lot closer to those of Putin rather than classical fascism, though.

      The term is neo-fascism...

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    2. Re:Nah, this is just stage 1 by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Anyone getting mod points as "insightful" for quoting Reagan shows that we still have people who haven't figured out that Supply Side is a fancy term for Economic Royalists about to crash the economy.

      It takes a lot of myopia and selecting history editing to make anything from the Reagan era a good idea. Most Reagan fans still have not figured out that he doubled taxes on the self employed and only lowered it for businesses and the wealthy. Sure, this sounds like a troll comment -- but the difference is; it's true.

      Oh, and Reaganites doubled the money going to Social Security -- which was right (except for the limit that kept wealthy people from paying more), so that SS is solvent. And yet, nobody knows that it's SUPPOSED to zero out around the time baby boomers are in the grave because it's mostly a transfer fund,... that's probably going to come as a shock and nonsense to most. That's why we have Think Tanks, so everyone else stops thinking.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    3. Re:Nah, this is just stage 1 by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You forget that once you METER something, then it effects everything down the line. It's not just the payment -- it's the effort involved in dealing with the payment.

      If someone at a school or business has to create a purchase order to request "X amount of projected Bits of Internet use" -- then the school/business has to meter and check and someone has to approve and someone else has to check the process.

      Sure the internet is a flexible commodity -- but it's not just the COST that will go up, it's the speed that will go down. You've just changed it from free form expression to something that has to be justified each and every time. Might as well get out that AOL floppy and fire up the old Modem and see if the government is checking the phone lines.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    4. Re:Nah, this is just stage 1 by astro · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not just about streaming. Downloading a modern Linux distro will now cost Hungarians almost five bucks. Downloading a current-gen game on steam, which will already cost them €60 (roughly 80 dollars) will now cost 15 dollars more.

    5. Re:Nah, this is just stage 1 by bjdevil66 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The original post makes a good point about the stifling effects of over-taxation and over-regulation - not some argument for supply side economics.

      Did you even think about the post, or did you immediately start typing up your anti-Reagan blast? Did you listen, or wait to talk?

      It's amazing how reactionary people are online these days. Look at some of the other responses besides this one. They can be summed up with - "Ohhp... someone said Ronald Reagan. Nanananana - not listening!".

      And people on the left wonder why Barack Obama's better ideas get buried in a wave of "rethuglican" ignorance - the exact, same way. Critical thought has given away to intellectual laziness and yelling factoids back and forth. No respect or compassion or will to work together... just "win the next election."

  2. Kinda funny how taxes set back the internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So taxes "set back the country's technological development by some 20 years", and when it's the internet the Slashdot crowd agrees.

    But if it's anything else, taxes are so great. "Pay your share!" Despite the fact that the government doing the taxing is just going to use those resources against you in the form of militarized police, warrantless wiretaps, and drone surveillance.

    1. Re:Kinda funny how taxes set back the internet by halivar · · Score: 3, Informative

      Errr... so I am sympathetic to the argument in general, but this case is about Hungary, not the US.

    2. Re:Kinda funny how taxes set back the internet by Chas · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're talking over half a buck ($0.62) per gigabyte.

      Think about this in terms of AT&T's DSL service. Where you're capped at 150GB (and it's ridiculously easy to exceed).

      That's an additional $93 over and above the cost of the connection itself! The ISPs are currently selling connections for $20-40 a pop.

      How, EXACTLY, are ISPs supposed to simply absorb these costs?

      The correct answer is "they aren't".

      So the additional costs are going to get kicked onto the end-user's bill.

      Now imagine your $20 a month internet services suddenly becoming a $110 a month internet service.

      This is a way to encourage people to NEVER use their internet service.

      It's the sort of thing that can cripple the entire industry in that country.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
  3. Surely there's more to come :( by tibit · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Hungary is, sadly, turning into authoritarian regime focused on maintaining the power of those at the top. Anything that feeds their spending habits is on the table, I'm sure. We should expect more news like that coming from Hungary :(

    --
    A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  4. Re:A few things... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hungarian dude here.

    1. That will be delegated to the ISPs. The plan is, that the ISPs should pay these taxes from their profits, and are expected NOT to increase the internet subscription fees, however, they will anyhow.
    2. It is a tax on everything. not just streaming.
    3. They won't leave anything untaxed.

  5. Already taxed? by fafaforza · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Isn't the Internet already taxed? Not sure about Hungary, but most places you're taxed for the computer you buy, and for Internet service you get from a provider. The provider is likely taxed for the copper/fiber, taxed for the employees they have, the equipment they purchase. Electricity, real estate, etc related to this endeavor. That's all taxed. Sounds like a desperate government out of ideas.

  6. What looks like a stupid tax from the US... by Torp · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... looks like an attempt to restrict free speech from a little closer to Hungary. The current regime has serious totaliarian tendencies and this tax (which will raise internet connection prices) leaves less avenues of communication for the Hungarian citizens.
    Note the prices for an internet connection; at 30 gbytes/month, this tax could double the entry level price. At the average salary in Hungary, the extra $18 will be felt.

    --
    I apologize for the lack of a signature.
  7. The sky is falling.....again? by jbmartin6 · · Score: 4, Informative

    This summary is a bit hysterical, in the excessively panicked sense. TFA indicates there is a cap on taxes for both individuals and service providers, and this DRAFT bill is likely to contain the same sort of provisions. Of course, whether such a tax is a good idea is up for debate, but statements like "could set back the country's technological development by some 20 years" are ridiculous. Excise taxes already exist on other goods and services without complete disaster.

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
  8. Re:A few things... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Your post just cost you 0.02 cents. Please pay up.

  9. Re:A few things... by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Insightful

    0.02 what? Let's hope Hungarian ISPs can do math better than Verizon!

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  10. Re:A few things... by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A large percentage of revenues from this tax will come from piracy and pornography. Nice way to fund a government and an interesting way to establish a conflict of interest in those matters.

  11. Re:A few things... by tburkhol · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My question is why a $0.62 USD tax on 1GB when a $1/month of 1mb/s can transfer 300GB? $186 of tax on $1 of service. That's a 18600% tax.

    That's the most shocking thing, to me, about this proposal. It's a HUGE potential cost. It would make 'modern' web pages, with their kilobytes (or megabytes) of never-executed, embedded javascript, massive stylesheets, fancy images, and ads-ads-ads, extremely expensive. I would expect every Hungarian to immediately cancel any streaming service and to turn off "Auto load images" and "precache links." I would expect that Hungarian web sites would return to 1990's style terse HTML. That could be a good way to drastically reduce bandwith use in any country that implemented it and dramatically increase the pressure on ISPs to upgrade their networks.

    Of course, applying it to the ISPs, rather than to the users, means that none of the bandwidth-conservation pressure will be applied to the people actually capable of affecting consumption, so it's likely to have no effect whatsoever. Except, maybe, to force all of the ISPs into bankruptcy

  12. Re:A few things... by qbast · · Score: 4, Funny

    Easy, government will forbid increasing fees.

  13. Re:A few things... by FirstOne · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Looks like "The power to tax is the power to destroy" is going to be demonstrated once again.

    If Hungary the want's to jump back into the stone age, so be it. P.S. This is just Draft legislation.. If the proposal is made into law, I see Google, Yahoo, and every major ISP abandoning that country in short order. Same goes for any web hosting providers. Backbone providers will route their traffic around that tiny country. I expect the transition to be relatively dramatic.

    One can only hope the voters recall their conservative stone age representatives and put in socialists in charge, with an eye to the future. I can also see the EU court stepping in an declaring this tax to be invalid/moot as a violation of human rights.

  14. Get a virus... by dargaud · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...and as it starts spewing Gb after Gb of spam, you are now bankrupt. Nice. Or if you have a server in the country and fall victim to a DOS attack, you must now pay for the Tb of data exchanged in the DOS and must sell your firstborn to pay the tax.

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?