Slashdot Mirror
What It Took For SpaceX To Become a Serious Space Company
An anonymous reader writes: The Atlantic has a nice profile of SpaceX's rise to prominence — how a private startup managed to successfully compete with industry giants like Boeing in just a decade of existence. "Regardless of its inspirations, the company was forced to adopt a prosaic initial goal: Make a rocket at least 10 times cheaper than is possible today. Until it can do that, neither flowers nor people can go to Mars with any economy. With rocket technology, Musk has said, "you're really left with one key parameter against which technology improvements must be judged, and that's cost." SpaceX currently charges $61.2 million per launch. Its cost-per-kilogram of cargo to low-earth orbit, $4,653, is far less than the $14,000 to $39,000 offered by its chief American competitor, the United Launch Alliance. Other providers often charge $250 to $400 million per launch; NASA pays Russia $70 million per astronaut to hitch a ride on its three-person Soyuz spacecraft. SpaceX's costs are still nowhere near low enough to change the economics of space as Musk and his investors envision, but they have a plan to do so (of which more later)."
An alternate link to the article at quartz: http://qz.com/281619/what-it-t...
Boeing doesn't exactly set high standards for their competitors to compete against.
You just need to get the money to enter Boeing's markets FIRST.
And if you're making that kind of money in your current business, why try to create a new business? Unless you're Elon Musk and that's what you do.
They get all that done AND do all the technical documentation crap that other people pretend makes their components so expensive.
You don't even understand the premise of the article.
To compete in price against anyone you only need money. With enough money, you can set a price of $0.
The main question is "will they be able to recover the cost of that competence once they get the contracts?" and it's way too soon to know the answer to that.
It's like judging the acquisition of online "businesses". Nobody can prove the price was or wasn't right until the buyer makes that back as profit or doesn't.
Eh, PayPal was among the first revolutionary online-payment services that enabled the rapid expansion of e-commerce. What you know now as the "evil PayPal" is what happened after Ebay bought it.
I still can't believe it is legal, in so many ways. I mean, I don't think anybody could argue ebay is not a monopoly in the online auction space, and yet they are allowed to only permit their own payment service (so they take a percentage on top of their commission).
Then, they hold your money like a bank account and even extend credit, and yet, unlike banks, they can freeze your money with no explanation.
The PayPal situation boggles the mind, but it is not related to Musk's X.com/PayPal.
Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
find a battery charging station on Mars.
I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
How are they ripping people off?
If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
Either that or he is legitimately trying to atone for all those years of ripping people off.
Probably not though. More likely just an elaborate ploy to extract more money from people by making them think that they're finally getting the future that they were always promised through imagination of self driving, self parking fully electric cars that are free from oil dependencies and commodity space travel for all when growing up and get them greater indebted towards Mr. Musk.
Wake me when he DOES something,
You mean something other than obscene amounts of money, right? Like, end poverty. Or, cure ebola.
It took a ton of money and the vision of a leader looking more than 3 years into the future. Anyone with enough money and willingness to throw that money at a "problem" will be able to compete.
"Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
I heard it's the same for Space X, not one rocket has actually been launched.They are always in the design and testing phase! What a joke! It's all a scam and the FTC is going to shut him down soon!
SpaceX's costs are still nowhere near low enough to change the economics of space as Musk and his investors envision, but they have a plan to do so (of which more later).
Long extension cord?
That is all.
When SpaceX is launching prefabbed Bigelow habs every day, THEN their a serious space industry. When the alignment of mass production finally hits the space age and we're launching more habs than we can fill with people...
The main problem with space travel so far has been a combination of custom parts and lack of scale. Get a cheap, rugged design made with commodity parts and then run it mass production style and you can really bring the cost down.
You and I are both lucky ones, who have never had a problem with Paypal. Other people get caught in Paypal hell, where they freeze funds and simply never release them. (They don't have to - they aren't a bank!)
I'm not going to provide citations. Please use Google.
It doesn't hurt to be nice.
You say it's easy. Then why don't you go and do something with your lives? I only wish we had a few more of people like this. Yes, he is rich, and he is planning to become even richer. At the same time, he is investing HIS money into something he believes in. Only hope he starts looking into things like hyperloop, and to make that financially viable.
At $4,653/kg to LEO it would cost rought 400K to push an average human to LEO which is significantly lower than what NASA pays the russians to do the exact same thing, hell they could make all their profit margins with massive room to spare by only charging NASA 1/10th what they pay Russia. Why is NASA wasting our money and boosting russias economy instead of doing this which would save massive amounts of money that could be spent otherways and would boost our local US economy by having the money re-enter circulation here.
Make a rocket at least 10 times cheaper than is possible today.
Hardly "prosaic"; Sounds pretty damn ambitious to me.
OK, they had access to some of the body of knowledge so expensively won by the Germans, USA, Russians et al, but they're still privately funded, developed in-house a working product that's much, much cheaper than the competition and employ nearly 4000 people.
Like Musk or not, he made it work so far.
The ebay/paypal double dipping is frustrating, and the money freezing risks are pretty sketchy, but for the most part, paypal is a useful and functional service. I have used it to buy and sell many things (both on and off ebay) without issue. I also use it to print postage for most things (their multi-order shipping thing is easier to use than any other site I have come across and I don't have to enter any new payment information since there is always a couple of bucks in my paypal account). I transfer any large amount of money back to my bank account right away, so I am not that worried about it being frozen.
If I were running an ebay business, I might be a little more concerned about the forced use of paypal, but at the end of the day, that is the price you pay for using their storefront service, having them market for you, and accessing the faith and trust of their customers vs trying to run your own online store. Sucks when something happens to your paypal account, but at the same time, half of your customers may only be comfortable dealing with you knowing that paypal can freeze your money if you don't deliver the item.
Bottles.
Anyone with enough money and willingness to throw that money at a "problem" will be able to compete.
Just because you throw lots of money at a problem doesn't mean you'll ever make a profit. If you cannot make a profit you will eventually go out of business. A bottomless (or effectively so) checkbook isn't necessarily enough. For example Microsoft may never make back all the money they invested in trying to make the Xbox competitive. Sure they "competed" but it was a Pyrrhic victory at best.
You clearly haven't been on the other side of the market.
I really wonder why no more attention goes to the Skylon project ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skylon_%28spacecraft%29 ). It could dramatically alter the price of sending stuff up.
Yet another Musk fantasy with no hope of becoming reality. Wake me when he DOES something, rather than pie-in-the-sky fantasy.
What have you done that is so spectacular? Go ahead and dazzle us.
Elon Musk has founded several very influential companies, turning those industries upside down in the process. You actually think starting Paypal, Tesla and SpaceX is not impressive? If that doesn't impress you then you plainly don't understand what all that means. You don't have to like the guy but he's certainly earned a measure of respect for his accomplishments.
nah, he's just realized that Paypal's pissed off so many people that he'll have to escape to Mars.
the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
They get all that done AND do all the technical documentation crap that other people pretend makes their components so expensive.
That's really not that big a deal. Being AS9100 or ISO9000 registered basically involves documenting the stuff you already have to do anyway in order to run your organization well and then actually doing what you document. It's really not all that big a deal. It doesn't mean you produce a good or bad product - it simply means you say what you do and do what you say. Pretty much any company that wants to do business in aerospace is AS9100 certified just like almost every company that works in automotive is ISO9000 (or equivalent) registered.
Anyone who claims that ISO9000 means they produce a good product is either lying or doesn't understand what ISO9000 means. Same with any of the other quality standards.
Isn't it absolutely crazy though how you pay a 10% commission when you buy postage FROM THEM? The majority of sellers seems to have minded such things though, as I don't find near as much stuff I did a few years ago.
>>"Make a rocket at least 10 times cheaper than is possible today."
Ughh! It isn't 10 times MORE of something, it's 1/10th as much of something!
Also, it's a monetary goal, not quality one. It isn't cheaper it's less expensive.
Does anyone really want to: "Make a rocket at most 1/10th the quality of what is possible today"?
That's often how people become rich: first you steal from the poor, then you steal from the rich.
Example: there's a guy in my neighborhood who ran one of those "cheque cashing businesses" for a while. People so poor and destitute they can't even get a bank account. So he charges them 15% or whatever, it doesn't matter because poor people can't afford lawyers and in any case it's hard to do legal research when you're hungry or too tired from a day at the warehouse. (A job where incidentally you need to bring your own workboots and gloves).
Then he just sits there for a few years with his "holdings company" while the money comes in and he pays no income tax...
When he got enough money he brought in a real estate agent and a development team into the same neighborhood and started evicting the working class people that rented there and put in fancy restaurants, upscale hair salons, tattoo parlours, you name it. All the useless shit people with too much money buy.
Here the people willingly go in to spend money.
Ta dah, he's set for life. University? Education? Hard work? No, no, and no.
Steal from the poor so you can steal from the rich.
I'd bet he also made sure that banks didn't have to offer bank accounts to "riskier" people (wait, I thought businesses were all about taking risks? Oh wait, YOU take the risk, they'll take the money! I get it!)
Mostly random stuff.
Well, you heard wrong. SpaceX has launched satellites and delivered cargo to the International Space Station. And to find this out all you had to do was go to their website and click on "NEWS".
Quote from Hans Koenigsmann, early German SpaceX employee, "My German accent helps in presentations. When I say, ‘This will work,’ it is more convincing than other accents for some reason.”
You people and your slight differences disgust me! - Prof. Farnsworth
That isn't "stealing from" that's "providing a service to".
EBay is no more a monopoly than Google is in search.
Who ya going to believe? Honest, trustworthy msmonroe who would never steer you wrong or your lying eyes?
I think your sarcasm detector is broken.
Looks like you forgot to include the part where that guy actually did any stealing.
Yahoo, Bing etc make up for more than 30% of search traffic. Plus they are well known fully functional search engines, so if Google started to ask you for money, you would have fine alternatives, they would pretty much give you similar functionality. Google.com might be ranked #1, but Yahoo is #4. Give me one solid alternative for ebay. If you didn't like ebay, would you be able to do your auction somewhere else and expect a broad audience? Ebay is ranked #24, it even has localized versions ranked in the top-100, and yet I had to search of what auction sites there are and the best I could find ranks #32000 (ebid.net). Only something like Amazon which does not do auctions can plausibly be considered sort of an alternative, but still, not similar enough.
I don't know that much about him other than as an investor, but the thing I have noticed about Elon Musk is that he does the homework. He works the numbers and if they don't add up he does something else. So although it seems to an outsider that he is doing something wild, he is actually keeping to a dry spreadsheet.
Someone who didn't do this might have tried a newer whiz-bang battery technology for Tesla. Or maybe fuel cells. Instead he stuck with "boring" old Li-Ion battery technology because he found a way to make the numbers work. And if that technology improves over what it can do today so much the better.
Maybe someone here more knowledgable than I am about what SpaceX is doing can say if he has done the same thing there. From the article it seems like SpaceX has managed to apply technology to get the price-point he thought was necessary. That suggests to me that Elon did his homework many years ago and did it right.
from Paul Spudis, "the Potemkin Village “commercial space program” is trotted out to demonstrate that we are accomplishing something."
http://www.spudislunarresource...
Well at least Elon had some hardware built instead of just PPTs. But some argue commercial space companies, "To be fair, probably about 25% of New Space does have some minimal substance, but over the past decade the clear majority of them have never amount to anything beyond a press conference where they make grandiose promises and then beg for money from investors and NASA."
mfwright@batnet.com
No, when you have no choice because the system is rigged against you from the start, it's stealing.
Mostly random stuff.
Could you emulate his "success"? Of course not.
Mostly random stuff.
Banks don't offer bank accounts to people with bad credit, they have bad credit because they can't get a bank account... Help the people get a bank account, or charge 15% off every transaction?
I think the answer tells a lot about you as a person, and us as a creature.
Mostly random stuff.
That's only a rumor. Are you sure it wasn't drawn in windows paint, printed out, then taped together, then re-scanned into windows to appear like a launch? They can do some amazing things on these here computers.
You still haven't described any "stealing".
The 15% from a poor person's paycheck. Do you have to pay a 15% service fee on your paycheck?
Read it again slower if it helps.
Mostly random stuff.
They consent to the fee when they choose to cash the check at the place that tells them up-front that there's a fee for cashing the check.
Also, banks don't deny accounts to people for having bad credit. They deny accounts to people who consistently write bad checks. And even then, there are ways to get a bank account regardless. So you can't even honestly claim that they have no alternatives.
Furthermore, you also described establishing businesses as "stealing from the rich", which is another claim you have failed to support.
You haven't described any "stealing" at any point in your posts. You are aware of this, and your condescension is not succeeding in its intended purpose of masking that fact.
"They consent to the fee when they choose to cash the check at the place that tells them up-front that there's a fee for cashing the check."
That's my whole point, there is no choice.
" banks don't deny accounts to people for having bad credit."
Banks vary depending in jurisdiction.
" you also described establishing businesses as "stealing from the rich""
What do you call a 250$ shave? Or a 50$ salad?? It's consensual theft, both parties know it's not worth that amount.
Mostly random stuff.
"there are ways to get a bank account regardless"
Which I believe I addressed here "people can't afford lawyers and in any case it's hard to do legal research when you're hungry or too tired from a day at the warehouse."
There's a whole ecosystem of systemic poverty that psychopaths can exploit.
Say, why don't you open a business to help people open bank accounts for 14% of their paycheck? Should be simple and very ethical, right?
I love it when well-fed, well-rested, well-educated people pontificate about what poor people should do...
Eh, who cares, let's screw them over some more. I've got a perfectly legal business to run here, it's not like the poor didn't have the same chances you and I got, eh? ;)
Mostly random stuff.
That's not your point at all, because there is a choice. There are multiple choices.
So what you're saying is that it's not in any way impossible to get a bank account on account of being "too poor".
Expensive. But that's entirely different than being "stealing".
It is impossible for there to be any such thing as "consensual theft". The idea of theft is predicated upon the absence of consent. If consent is given, the transfer cannot be theft. You were aware of that when you said this, and are therefore a liar.
A product or service is worth what its purchaser is willing to pay for it. If a restaurant's customers are willing to pay $50 for a salad, then those salads are worth $50, regardless of what you or I think of it.
You have continually failed to describe any "stealing". You will continue to fail at doing so. You will likewise fail at covering up your obvious humiliation that you have brought upon yourself by purely emotional arguments that you can't support and won't think through.
You didn't address that point at all, because this isn't something you need a lawyer for.
I have never denied that. But that beside the point, which is that neither of the things you describe are "stealing".
At what point did I say it was ethical? I didn't, and you were aware of that when you chose to put those words in my mouth. This makes you a liar.
I did not do that. This is another statement you knew to be untrue when you made it, and further proof that you are a liar.
Once again, you have chosen to pretend I stated support for a position that you made up. This is a strawman argument, and therefore a lie.
You have chosen to lie because you are aware that you are unable to argue on the facts.
You also abandoned your attempts to defend the pretense that it's "stealing" to open a business. You did this because you knew you can't do it.
You will now continue the shrieking tantrum you have been throwing for this entire thread. You will attempt to mask your impotent rage behind a facade of affected amusement, and you will continue to fail miserably.
Um logic fallacy much? Following that logic, nobody would have a bank account. People are not born with a bank account, so with that logic, they could not get any. In almost all cases where people don't have a bank account is because they have bad credit based on the plain fact that they failed to pay their dues. When you have no prior debt your credit score is plainly not so abysmal that you will not get a bank account; they won't give you a large credit though.
Actually Ebay is a monopoly.
Every economics book bought after 2005 points to it as the best example of the definition. Its not that it's trying to be, it's just that if another business tried to step in, it would make prices of the goods go up rather than down. Its a very rare business class where only having one company dominate the space is the best thing consumers could ask for.
"You will now continue the shrieking tantrum you have been throwing"
Hmmm....
"You will attempt to mask your impotent rage behind a facade of affected amusement, and you will continue to fail miserably."
Hmmmm....
"I did not do that"
You sure did: "They consent to the fee when they choose to cash the check"
They're not choosing. That's my whole point. They *have* no choice. That's the stealing part.
Mostly random stuff.
"That's not your point at all, because there is a choice. There are multiple choices."
There aren't.
"So what you're saying is that it's not in any way impossible to get a bank account on account of being "too poor"."
Sure, because they first thing a warehouse worker does on payday Friday is fly over to a place where the laws are different... What universe are you in?
"Expensive. But that's entirely different than being "stealing"."
Maybe there's a better word for it, but the whole idea is that we in the West are a post-industrial society, and the best way to make money is to become a middleman to questionable transactions like 15% cheque cashing, or make money off the other rentiers.
Both transactions produce nothing, yet transfer money up. Theft.
"A product or service is worth what its purchaser is willing to pay for it. "
If there's no choice, there's no will. A warehouse worker who can't get a bank account and has to use a sketchy place isn't going to be able to just magically go to a jurisdiction that favors him...
You have continuously wiggled your way out of the truth by using ridiculous counter-examples that apply to no poor person. You will continue to hide your obvious psychopathy and lack of empathy by pretending to be this intellectually rigorous debater when you're just a cunt.
Mostly random stuff.
Referring to the goal as prosaic isn't a good usage of the word. Used correctly, the header would have been something like: "...began with a prosaic declaration: Make a rocket at least 10 times cheaper than is possible today." Nothing about the initial goal is prosaic; it is the way Elon Musk described it in his manifesto for SpaceX that was blunt and matter of fact.
There are.
The one where he doesn't need to.
Because the word you so badly want to use doesn't apply, and you know it.
Irrelevant. Both transactions involve consent, which is mutually exclusive with theft.
Claiming that the transactions "produce nothing" is a lie, because you are aware that in both cases, valuable services are being provided. You can argue that check-cashing is excessively expensive (something that I have never denied, though you have certainly pretended I did), but "is it exploitative?" is an entirely separate question than "is it theft?". There is a good argument to be made for the former question, but the answer to the latter can never be anything other than "no".
You go on to lie again, by repeating your claim that the transactions are "theft", even though your previous paragraph openly admitted that it isn't.
First, I said that in regards to the $50 salad. By attempting to change the context of my statement, you have admitted that you can't refute it.
Second, you have been shown absolute and irrefutable proof that there is a choice. Therefore, there is will, and thus consent. Consequently, no possibility of "theft". Not that you really needed that proof, as you were aware that other choices existed even prior to this post.
This clumsy attempt at turning my own weapons against me is an acknowledgement of their effectiveness, and thus, that absolutely everything I have said about you is 100% accurate.
Furthermore, my "obvious psychopathy and lack of empathy" exist entirely within your imagination, and are an excuse on your part to avoid thinking about the topic by assigning to me the traits you desperately want me to have and focusing on the much easier task of assassinating (your made-up version of) my character. You would not do this if you had any confidence or ability to argue the facts.
This is exactly what I said you would do.
In no way is that "pontificating about what poor people should do". It is a simple factual statement of what people who use check-cashing services are doing. At no point did I suggest what anyone (poor or not) should do. You were aware of the difference when you posted that, but you chose to lie because your efforts to find such a statement among my posts failed completely, and you had to resort to willful misinterpretation in order to convince yourself that I had done what you falsely accused me of doing.
And even if I had made such a statement, it would not prove your point in any way, because it's nothing but an ad hominem argument that has no bearing on your claim about what is and isn't theft. So not only did you lie (yet again), but you did so in a way that would not have gained you anything even if it had succeeded.
They are choosing, and you know it. I have demonstrated the fact that other choices exist. You cannot and will not disprove that fact, because you know and have known from the very start that they are there. You just don't want them to be there, because you value your sense of righteous indignation more than you value the people you're pretending to champion.