Slashdot Mirror


The Students Who Feel They Have the Right To Cheat

ub3r n3u7r4l1st writes with this story of endemic cheating in Indian Universities and the students who see it as a right. "Students are often keen to exercise their rights but recently there has been an interesting twist - some in India are talking about their right to cheat in university exams. 'It is our democratic right!' a thin, addled-looking man named Pratap Singh once said to me as he stood, chai in hand, outside his university in the northern state of Uttar Pradesh. 'Cheating is our birthright.' Corruption in the university exam system is common in this part of India. The rich can bribe their way to examination success. There's even a whole subset of the youth population who are brokers between desperate students and avaricious administrators. Then there's another class of student altogether, who are so well known locally - so renowned for their political links - invigilators dare not touch them. I've heard that these local thugs sometimes leave daggers on their desk in the exam hall. It's a sign to invigilators: 'Leave me alone... or else.' So if those with money or political influence can cheat, poorer students ask, why shouldn't they?"

74 of 438 comments (clear)

  1. Be the Change You Wish to See in the World by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Interesting
    When I was younger and I first came across this quote by Mahatma Gandhi:

    You must be the change you wish to see in the world.

    I always thought it was bizarrely tautological. If you wish something to be different and you personally can make a choice for it under your control to be different, then you make the correct choice. For example, I don't throw a soda can out the window of my car while complaining about pollution on the highway. Other people obviously don't care but I control the drop in the bucket I'm responsible for and I make the ethical choice.

    But as I got older, I actually found and still find people that think they should be forced to do it the right way even while complaining about the abuse. Case in point, a friend in the medical profession was actually complaining about tax dodges while setting up his own backdoor Roth IRA. When I asked him about abusing the very rules he was decrying, he simply shrugged and said he doesn't make the rules he just follows them. He acknowledged it's shady as hell but pretty much felt like his hands were tied.

    It was deeply troubling ... I get a similar feeling about this article. I understand it is sometimes harder to play by ethical rules than legal rules when everyone around you is benefiting from misconduct but ... it seems this is yet another example of the caste system thriving in India. It's simply stupefying on the "My dad is Li Gang" level.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Be the Change You Wish to See in the World by Spazmania · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I keep hoping my Verizon stock will crater. They lead the oligarchy that controls the Internet. But until it does collapse, I'll continue to cash my dividends.

      There's another tautology out there:

      "God grant me the serenity
      to accept the things I cannot change;
      courage to change the things I can;
      and wisdom to know the difference."

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    2. Re:Be the Change You Wish to See in the World by Reason58 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There is nothing shady about backdoor conversions. They were forbidden in the past, and then made explicitly allowable in 2010. Cheating on tests, even in India, is not explicitly allowed by universities. In that case it is pure corruption.

    3. Re:Be the Change You Wish to See in the World by paiute · · Score: 5, Funny

      "God grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change; and enough ammo to change the things I can."

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    4. Re:Be the Change You Wish to See in the World by MobyDisk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I like your comment, but I do want to point out a difference in magnitude about your example:

      Case in point, a friend in the medical profession was actually complaining about tax dodges while setting up his own backdoor Roth IRA [personalcapital.com]. When I asked him about abusing the very rules he was decrying, he simply shrugged and said he doesn't make the rules he just follows them. He acknowledged it's shady as hell but pretty much felt like his hands were tied.

      I will say that this example is an order of magnitude different from cheating on a school exam. In this case, the doctor is following the written laws. Of course, the laws are foolishly written in this case, and should probably be fixed, but few people believe that tax loopholes represent a "moral" quandary. (Update - another poster explained that backdoor Roth IRAs are explicitly allowed by the law, so it isn't a mistake apparently. Perhaps the name makes it sound worse than it really is.) Cheating however, is closer to lying. The cheater is lying about their knowledge and skills. That lie denies someone else their right to education, instead granting it to some lazy person who does not have the credentials.

      Back to your medical professional, I would still go to a doctor who had a backdoor Roth IRA. But I would not want to go to a doctor who cheated their way through medical school! In America, we mostly accept the concept of "merit," but I'm not sure that all cultures do. It wasn't that long ago that India had castes, where birthright was more important than merit. Is it like racism in the US: publicly most everyone agrees it is wrong but there are still deep-seated biases?

      I know very few people who turn down tax benefits because they disagree with that particular tax benefit.

    5. Re:Be the Change You Wish to See in the World by Kjella · · Score: 2

      If you see your action as independent of or an example for everyone else's, then yes. Those that throw litter out the window aren't looking out and thinking "oh, there's room for one more can out there". But if you feel your good action is being used to counter the overall goal, then it's different. For example say you go to a restaurant and think the service was excellent and want to give a big tip, only to discover that the others are just limping in with the minimum to make the total a modest tip. Your generosity has simply been exploited to support their greed, it didn't end up serving the goal. Are you still going to put in anything extra next time?

      You alone deciding not to cheat in a system with rampant cheating won't bring you closer to the goal of a fair evaluation based on merit, it'll only screw yourself over because the cheaters won't stop just because you do. If I get punched by a bully, I don't have a problem with throwing a punch back. That is solving problems through violence. Not because I think violence is a good way to solve problems. Not because I wouldn't support a crackdown on punching. But until such time that someone can really solve the bullying problem, I'm not going to be the punching bag. Let the bully find someone else who doesn't punch back. It doesn't solve the problem, but it solves my problem. So yeah, I think it's easy to find a justification to fight fire with fire.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    6. Re:Be the Change You Wish to See in the World by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A test is way to assess whether or not someone understands the material. But keep thinking it's a control issue.

    7. Re:Be the Change You Wish to See in the World by ranton · · Score: 2

      Not all examples of "playing the system" are as hypocritical as your doctor friend. Often playing the game more ethically instead of just by the rules can put you at severe disadvantages. In your anecdote the doctor is probably not at a disadvantage in his business if he didn't set up a backdoor Roth IRA, he probably would just have a $750k house instead of an $800k one. But not all situations are as clear cut.

      I for instance hate how schools are funded in this country. Property taxes fund the schools, so schools in wealthy districts are much better than average. On top of this, zoning of housing ensures that only expensive houses are built in the wealthy districts, so very few lower middle class children / parents mix in with the wealthier ones. But while I hate this, I spent the extra money to live in arguably the best school district in my state (well, I didn't spend more money but I got a smaller home than I could have just 10 minutes away) I also actively oppose cheaper housing being built in my area because it could lower my home's value and lower the quality of my daughter's education. It may be slightly hypocritical, but I am going to do what is in my daughter's best interest.

      These cheating school children have a similar dilemma. Rich kids can cheat the system through bribes or expensive tutors that make up for the poor education they would otherwise get. For poor kids to compete, they need to find ways of cheating that don't require money.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    8. Re:Be the Change You Wish to See in the World by Kielistic · · Score: 2

      When the goal is personal knowledge you can leave human competitive drive to push students forward. When 99% of education is to compete in the job market people will minimize effort while maximizing job prospects. Hence cheating.

    9. Re:Be the Change You Wish to See in the World by PRMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      All along I thought this was a nice little anecdote. Now you're telling me it's nothing but a Christian copout for doing the right thing?

      How about Jesus saying, "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." It's the same thing. If you think something should be a certain way, then it's up to you to follow your conscience. Not say, "Oh well, it can't be helped, might as well profit from these slaves."

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    10. Re:Be the Change You Wish to See in the World by meta-monkey · · Score: 2

      I try to live by that creed myself, but in some things it simply isn't practical.

      When I was in college one of the courses I took was Communications (electrical engineering communications, not like mass com or something. Cell phone systems and wifi and that kind of thing). The 70-odd year old professor was well known to use the same exam semester after semester after semester. Maybe he might change a number, but the problem was exactly the same. He also allowed crib sheets. So, everybody got a copy of the previous exam from a friend and put it on their crib sheet. I didn't find that ethical, and would have much rather just had a fair test. But what do you do, when the rest of the class is guaranteed a 100? Be the one chump who takes their chances?

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    11. Re:Be the Change You Wish to See in the World by CauseBy · · Score: 2

      I think I'm with your friend on this one. Wishing to live in a better world does not obligate you to ignore that you actually live in this one.

      If there were no rules against littering, then I probably still wouldn't, because that is such a minor action. But just because I think we should do away with, say, tax credits for children doesn't mean I don't take my child tax credits. I can think of many many such examples and I don't blame your friend for doing what was legal and in his financial interests -- I save my blame for the law. Change that law.

    12. Re:Be the Change You Wish to See in the World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      i'm ok with this, if [you/your children] are first in line to undergo surgery from a doctor that cheated his way through med school.

    13. Re:Be the Change You Wish to See in the World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As an educator, I feel I should comment: exams are absolutely unnecessary if you have self-motivated students who just want to learn the material. But neither is a classroom -- just hand them a book and some video lectures, and they'll figure it out. A good university's job is to educate students and certify that the students learned the material. You can't certify that they've learned the material without testing them, and you can't make sure that they learn the material without providing them with incentives, because most students are not sufficiently self-motivated.

    14. Re:Be the Change You Wish to See in the World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But what do you do, when the rest of the class is guaranteed a 100? Be the one chump who takes their chances?

      If everyone else at the gym was cheating, would you? Why the fuck are you at college in the first place? If you aren't there to get an education, you're just going to be another one of the growing number of underemployed seatwarmers with a hollow degree. You'll betray yourself the moment you open your mouth in a job interview.

      So yeah, I am one of those chumps that won't cheat. I even got kicked in the face with an "Oh, fuck. I should have studied for that test" a few times. I don't regret that for a moment.

    15. Re: Be the Change You Wish to See in the World by Rakarra · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I came across a site freelancers.com. Most of the projects on there are for university students cheating on their projects. Just another indicator India has fallen from the bright engineers of the 90's to the dim witted inept engineers that we see today.

      Perhaps that, but also because those bright engineers of yesteryear got into it for the interest in the subject. Maybe they were also farsighted enough to see where the position could take them.

      These days, tech is strongly, strongly pushed in India as it's seen as a great way to bring in foreign capital. It leads to too many engineers who can't actually hack it, like diploma mills in the US but on a much larger scale.

    16. Re:Be the Change You Wish to See in the World by Pope+Hagbard · · Score: 2

      You'd have a leg to stand on without his second paragraph. The second para pretty clearly advocates "moral pragmatism" like his "enlightened slavery" example as opposed to idealism like forcing the southerners to free their slaves.

    17. Re:Be the Change You Wish to See in the World by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Informative

      So its racist to point out what actually happened in the past with regards to slavery? politically correct much? Are your history books doubleplusgood and blame every bad thing in history on WASP penis holders?

      And News Flash, the slave boats? yeah the crews never even had to step off the boat as BLACK SLAVERS had thousands lined up and ready to go before they even pulled into the harbor...after they were done raping and pillaging of course. There is even evidence that ebonics is based on the pigeon English picked up by black slavers to allow them to trade with the white boats.Ironically if you want to buy slaves in bulk in 2014 just as you did in 1814? You can go to the black Muslim slave traders in Africa and buy black slaves by the truckload. Now just as then it comes down to tribal bullshit but as we saw with those 5000 schoolgirls they are rolling like its 1799 over there, even raping and pillaging just as they did then if the reports are accurate.

      Whether you choose to accept history or not doesn't change the fact that southern slavery would have not been able to function without the hard work and dedication of black slavers in providing product, 200 white guys wandering around in the African jungle looking for slaves would last about as long as a Christian street preacher would last in Mecca today.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    18. Re:Be the Change You Wish to See in the World by belmolis · · Score: 2

      That was true in some societies, but for the most part not in the African slave trade. There slavers went out specifically in order to capture slaves. They weren't otherwise engaged in warfare.

    19. Re:Be the Change You Wish to See in the World by Spazmania · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, "acquiring more" slaves from Africa became illegal in the U.S. in 1808 via the "Act Prohibiting Importation of Slaves." That act was passed by both northern and southern congressman, not even two full decades after ratifcation of the Constitution. We started on the gentle path to the end of slavery more than three decades before the civil war.

      Suppose, just for a moment, that the abolitionist movement of the 1850's had been led by pragmatists instead of idealists. Imagine an alternate history where they demanded, not the immediate abolishment of slavery but a "born free" act where any child born in the U.S. was a free citizen regardless of parentage.

      Gradual change. No immediate threat to the southern economy. No pressing need for secession. Yes, the last vestiges of slavery would have lasted into the first two decades of the 20th century but there might have been no destructive war. And no vicious hatred in the south persisting across generations and taken out on the only victims available.

      Without the racism born of southern civil war hatred for the north, black participation in the world wars might have been seen as a good thing rather than a bad one, leaving large numbers of blacks college educated under the G.I. Bill afterward. Which could well have led to civil rights a decade early and both more gently and more completely.

      And Abe Lincoln wouldn't have needed to reinterpret the Constitution to permit the vastly increased federal and executive power we so often decry in this very forum.

      The idealists of the 1850s took a trend that was growing inevitable and instead of letting it play out backed their opponents into a corner, yielding an immediate, grisly, and needless war.

      And yes, I despise H1B. As you say, it's an indentured labor program. There should be no work in the U.S. without the opportunity for citizenship and never, never a case where an employer holds the key to an individual's ability to remain in the country. I'm in favor of permitting talented technicians to immigrate. Even those with Indian degrees. ;-) But the H1B program does it in a way that's unethical.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    20. Re:Be the Change You Wish to See in the World by danlip · · Score: 2

      I think at one point it was true in Africa as well, but the demand for slaves changed the dynamic completely. hairyfeet's attempt to place the blame on anyone but the people buying the slaves is silly, since the end-buyers were fundamental to the economics driving the entire system.

    21. Re:Be the Change You Wish to See in the World by davydagger · · Score: 2

      >For a few U.S. southern slave owners, the solution was to earn enough off the slaves that they could afford to free them in their wills. Were they wrong?

      irrelivant, that is not a solution to the problem at hand.

      >Would the slaves have been better off in Africa, dead of one savagery or another?

      yes. the african notion of "slavery" was far better than ours, and far less perminant. they were far more likely to die in some savagery related to either Slavery in the US, or the transporation to the US than they were in Africa.

      And yes, many if not a good deal of Africa's problems today are related to their longstanding status as colonies, and the mess europeans(and arabs) made.

    22. Re:Be the Change You Wish to See in the World by Pope+Hagbard · · Score: 2

      The south rebelled because the mere action of lincoln being elected, not because anything he actually did

      Just like the teabaggers had their tantrum after Obama's election, oddly enough.

    23. Re:Be the Change You Wish to See in the World by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 2

      "Imagine an alternate history where they demanded, not the immediate abolishment of slavery but a "born free" act where any child born in the U.S. was a free citizen regardless of parentage."

      That sounds great for everyone, except the slaves.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    24. Re:Be the Change You Wish to See in the World by penguinoid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A good university's job is to educate students and certify that the students learned the material.

      There's no reason you couldn't have a university that explicitly doesn't certify that students learned the material. In fact it might be better if they didn't, so they could focus on teaching without all the conflicts of interest regarding grades*. Let someone else certify the students' competence.

      Conflicts of interest:
      1) teachers are motivated to inflate students' grades, because their students' grasp of the material reflects on the teacher's ability
      2) universities are motivated to inflate students' grades, because prospective students are willing to pay more for higher expected grades
      3) students cheating on a university test also sabotage the teacher's ability to teach and the students' own self-assessment ability, besides the usual effect of cheating
      4) universities were supposed to be a place of higher learning; now their primary job (in the eyes of students and employers) is certification. The diploma seems to be worth more than the education.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    25. Re:Be the Change You Wish to See in the World by LordLimecat · · Score: 2

      . I understand it is sometimes harder to play by ethical rules than legal rules

      This is a false dilemma. It really isnt. It takes conscious effort to cheat, it does not happen automatically.

      I can blame my good upbringing that the thought of cheating is infathomable to me, but because of that I can note that it hasnt been something I've had to take conscious effort to avoid.

      Yes, this means I have flunked classes before. Life moves on, and you learn from it. But lets not minimize cheating down to "well, its kind of hard to avoid" as if it were something that just lands on your life.

    26. Re:Be the Change You Wish to See in the World by Spazmania · · Score: 2

      So instead of 3,950,000 slaves gradually reducing to 0 over the course of 60ish years, actual history saw 620,000 dead, entire cities in ruins, and a century of violent hatred that has left most slaves' great great grandchildren still living in poverty as a semi-permanent underclass. All of it overseen by an out of control federal government bloated and twisted beyond recognition.

      That was SO much better because, you know, freedom.

      The lost opportunities were staggering. We were planning to buy Cuba from Spain for $130m around the time the war broke out. Couldn't afford it after. They eventually had an independence war instead. How different might the 20th century have been were Cuba the 51st state.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    27. Re:Be the Change You Wish to See in the World by flopsquad · · Score: 2

      And no vicious hatred in the south persisting across generations and taken out on the only victims available.

      I believe the vicious hatred stems more from brutal Reconstruction-era policies (much motivated by outrage at Lincoln's assassination) than from the war itself. The entire American South would've been much better off without John Wilkes Booth.

      If anyone could've threaded the needle during that delicate time, it was Abe. Lincoln's successor, President Johnson, was no Lincoln, and squandered his political capital losing battles with the Radical Republicans. So you have multiple tracks of dominoes falling from the assassination, leading to a very vindictive (but also more staunchly pro-civil rights, which IMHO is the morally correct side of history) Reconstruction.

      Also, offhand, I don't see how a gradual "free at birth" policy would operate in practice. Yes, on paper and in the aggregate, it could work. But what do you do with a generation of babies born to parents who are property? Who's going to raise these "free" children if not their enslaved parents? Who is going to ensure that these kids wind up independent and enfranchised? Knowing that (even to this day) a parent's wealth and ability to provide are major determinants of life outcome, how can you expect children born in captivity to actually escape the plantation, get an education or job, and actually live free lives? No, I think such a plan would've perpetuated de facto slavery for pretty much all southern blacks, well into the 20th century.

      You can blame the Civil War, or (more accurately) what happened after the War, but it's wishful thinking to say it was "needless." More, even, to imagine that the deep rooted racial attitudes were caused by the War itself, and could somehow be mitigated by slowing southern blacks' path out of bondage.

      --
      Nothing posted to /. has ever been legal advice, including this.
    28. Re:Be the Change You Wish to See in the World by LordLimecat · · Score: 2

      I think its kind of irrelevant to remark on the subject of the slave trade, "well, imagine all of the OTHER horrors that would have happened to them if we had not inflicted our brand of horror!"

      If the african tribes would have enslaved or brutalized each other, that would be wrong in its own right; but as they did not have the opportunity we cannot blame them for said hypothetical savagery. What we can blame is those who did actually inflict a brand of savagery on them by tearing the families apart and subjecting them to slavery. Trying to shift the conversation like that is pretty deeply inappropriate, sort of like asking at the trial of a murderer whether his crime saved his victims from various other hardships in life.

    29. Re:Be the Change You Wish to See in the World by manwargi · · Score: 2

      Would the slaves have been better off in Africa, dead of one savagery or another?

      Hmm, isn't freedom an American value? Would you be happier if the quality and safety of your life was improved at the expense of being much more strictly controlled by another entity?

  2. Ok... just turned two score, but... by Kenja · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just hit my two score birthday, so perhaps its the age talking, but MAN are kids today idiots.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:Ok... just turned two score, but... by Reason58 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Kids in your day were just as stupid; you are just smart enough to recognize it now.

    2. Re:Ok... just turned two score, but... by Spazmania · · Score: 2

      At two score and one, I look back at the kids I knew when I was a kid and realize that many of them were (and probably still are) idiots.

      Today my only contact with kids is via the news. The news rarely reported on the smart kids back then too. It reported on the sycophants (spelling bee!) and the phenomenal idiots. As it still does.

      So yeah, kids today are idiots. But when was that not the case? Your childhood?

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    3. Re:Ok... just turned two score, but... by SJHillman · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There's a name for the effect, which I can't recall, but we tend to project our current self into our past self's shoes. When someone in their 40s thinks about when they were a teenager, they remember it as if they had the experience and wisdom that they have in their 40s, not as they actually were in their teens. This is one of the main reasons older generations talk about how kids these days are dumber, etc... because they don't accurately remember how kids were in their day, just how they would have been if they had decades more life experience.

      TL;DR: You were just as dumb as a kid as the "kids these day" are that you're complaining about... you're just too dumb to account for the decades in between.

    4. Re:Ok... just turned two score, but... by TheCarp · · Score: 2

      I am at about the same but, for some reason I don't think they seem any more idiotic than we were at their age. Pretty sure that by my standards today I was a moron at their age.

      Which is why the old saying goes, "age and treachery will always beat youth and exhuberance".

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    5. Re:Ok... just turned two score, but... by penguinoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just hit my two score birthday, so perhaps its the age talking, but MAN are kids today idiots.

      He's right though -- allowing everyone to cheat would fix the problem in no time. It would be amusing because then the previous batch of cheaters would be complaining that their degree is entirely worthless because of all the other cheaters, then there could be some discussion as to why one group should be allowed to cheat while another isn't, and then they can either get rid of grades entirely or try to stop the cheating.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    6. Re:Ok... just turned two score, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Depends... I'm about the same age as the parent poster, and I know I've done some dumb things, although nothing that would constitute as autodarwination. No grunge tattoos, no Prince Alberts, no Skid Row-esque ear to nose piercings.

      I don't really see the college student age range as dumber. Hell, they have far more info at their fingertips than when I was in college (I had to either use the man command, or actually go to the 1300 page binder that had all the stuff printed out near the room of VT-100 terminals.) The difference is income. Camaros, Buick Regals, and Mustangs got replaced by Civics... and now because of declining incomes, at best, people have low-end Mazda 3s, VW Jettas, Kias, or Hyndais -- cars that people would have sneered at five years ago.

      Less income available, coupled with inflation makes people have to improvise. With the Trans-Pacific Partnership allowing for China to have even more control of the US, living standards only will get worse unless one owns a business or is lucky enough to have enough investments to not have to actively seek out work.

      The high schoolers I encounter are not dumb either. Stuff that was done way back when (racing, donuts in the parking lot, moving a teacher's car to the football field) would cause a teen to wind up in jail with felony-hard charges, and where I live, there is no definite release date for juvis... they have to "earn" their release in the private prison system... or stay in until age 21. Just telling a teacher off, something that might get an afternoon of detention or maybe a day of ISS... will earn jail time, maybe even a felony. So, high school kids are pretty limited in their "rebellion" to what type of breed of cat pictures they can stick on their backpack in class. Music sucks, as pirates have caused record labels to collapse, and only corporate-made bands are promoed. Yes, one has more bands to find, but the days of having a radio station as something in common with others is long gone.

      The kids have not gotten dumber... they just have a pretty crappy hand dealt to them. The wealth in the US has fled offshore, so have the meaningful jobs. Their kids will be the ones walking to school barefoot, in the snow, uphill both ways.

    7. Re:Ok... just turned two score, but... by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Great post, and right on the money.

      I remember going to high school in the early 80's...
      Holy shit did we have it made.

      I've been saying for years now that I'm glad I was a kid when I was. Kids today have it rough, and from a multitude of angles:
      • Slowly declining economy...
      • Constant threats of terrorism in the media
      • Parents who won't let them leave their sight
      • Very poor examples from adults
      • Poor job opportunities after graduation
      • Life in a surveillance state
      • Massive student debt to achieve degree
      • Having to be careful about what they post online...
      • Declining education system
      • Constant threat of school shootings
      • Online bullying, etc
      • Constant reminders of the end of the ecosystem as we know it
      • etc;...

      I'll tell you straight up, I have a lot of respect for Millennials, if for nothing else, all the crap they are faced with...
      And the fact that as a whole they are optimistic in the face of it.

      My generation(X) had bad attitudes right out of the gate...

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    8. Re:Ok... just turned two score, but... by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think you might be searching for the term "nostalgia bias" otherwise known as rosy retrospection.

      .

      Nothing annoys a young person like an old person talking about the "good old days" especially when there exists objective historical records demonstrating that they were dumber, they had a lower quality of life, their technology was inferior, their brand of politics had horrendous consequences, etc..

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    9. Re:Ok... just turned two score, but... by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2

      I think the main difference is this:

      In our day when we did a stupid thing, only a small group of people knew about it.

      Today, when a kid does a stupid thing, a photo/video/post/etc can be shared with the world showing people all over the planet just how stupid this kid was.

      Does everyone in the world care what stupid thing RANDOM_KID does? Of course not, but the fact that the Internet spreads this out there so widely can make what normally would have been a "your friends joke about it for a week" incident into total strangers commenting on how dumb you are.

      (Sadly, many kids don't know one rule I learned that made me much happier: Take all positive comments you can from anyone, but only take negative comments from a trusted group of people [friends, family, co-workers, etc]. Ignore all other negative comments.)

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    10. Re:Ok... just turned two score, but... by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 2

      There's a name for the effect, which I can't recall, but we tend to project our current self into our past self's shoes. When someone in their 40s thinks about when they were a teenager, they remember it as if they had the experience and wisdom that they have in their 40s, not as they actually were in their teens. This is one of the main reasons older generations talk about how kids these days are dumber, etc... because they don't accurately remember how kids were in their day, just how they would have been if they had decades more life experience.

      TL;DR: You were just as dumb as a kid as the "kids these day" are that you're complaining about... you're just too dumb to account for the decades in between.

      Actually, I well remember how stupid I was as well as all my friends. I'd crap if I caught my kids doing 1/10th the stuff my friends and I used to do.

      That said - I knew plenty of people who would cheat on tests given the chance, but I don't remember a single one who tried to justify it when caught. They knew they were wrong, they just didn't care.

      Claiming that cheating is okay is worse than simply cheating.

    11. Re:Ok... just turned two score, but... by pnutjam · · Score: 5, Insightful

      About to hit 42 myself and completely agree. And we were thought to be completely rotten teens by adults.... today's kids make us look like genius saints.
      -said every 42 year old in history...

    12. Re:Ok... just turned two score, but... by mcrbids · · Score: 2

      You make it sound like it was paradise in the 80s. It had it's suckiness, just like we do today.

      1) There was constant threats of terrorism in the media in the 80s. Take a look at the "Libyans" in "Back to the Future".

      2) Helicopter parents were definitely a thing in the 80s.

      3) There were plenty of poor example adults in the 80s.

      4) I'll 100% grant that entry level jobs are *much* harder to find now.

      5) NSA and FBI watched us in the 80s. Ma Bell logged every call ever made. What was that you were saying on the CB Radio, back when the FCC actually gave a damn?

      6) Granted Massive student debt, partially offset by the relative ease of getting into school. Yes, debt is a problem, especially when you pick a lame degree. It was always a problem, more so now.

      7) There was no "online", so no posting stupid stuff online, and no online bullying. Bullying back then wasn't some insult posted in a chat root, it was a broken jaw. I remember well facing my bully with a stick in my hand, and being knocked flat repeatedly by a kid with 30 pounds on me, while I cursed defiantly and got up to face him again.

      8) Education system was "declining" then too.

      9) I'd argue that the cold war and the constant threat of total, global annihilation far outweighs a few school shootings. Or did you forget that little detail?

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    13. Re:Ok... just turned two score, but... by davydagger · · Score: 2

      >Music sucks, as pirates have caused record labels to collapse

      record labels collapsed because they live in a time without a viable business model. Don't blame that on the fucking pirates.

      As for only promoting pop bands, its what they've been moving to ever since the 1980s, slowly trying to weasel out real music, while leading vicious crackdowns on subculture.

      That has more to do with the aftermath of the columbine shootings than it does piracy, where in the aftermath, arrest, harrassment, assault against, as well as conspiracy against "goths", and by "goths", they meant "everything that wasn't pop music".

  3. Worthless degrees by Spazmania · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is why university degrees from India are about as valuable as a high school diploma in the U.S.

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    1. Re:Worthless degrees by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 5, Informative
      You over estimate the university degrees from India.

      I am from India. I know what I'm talking about. But for a few good schools like IIT, IIM, IISc, AIIMS, NITs etc rest of what passes for college education in India is nothing more than rote-memorization and regurgitation. Both the Physics Nobel laureates of Indian origin (Raman and Chandrasekhar) are alumna of the University of Madras. Today, that univ does not have a single math prof capable of correcting an answers in a Real Analysis examination. The syllabus specifically says, "Real Analysis, with theorems and proofs as stated in the book Real Analysis by Apostal". You deviate from the proof given in that book, the professors are incapable of checking whether it is right or wrong. It is a disgrace to call it a university.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    2. Re:Worthless degrees by DigiShaman · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wrong! These Indians with a university degree is worth more than an American with a degree in CompSci at UT. The H1B status proves it!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    3. Re:Worthless degrees by TigerNut · · Score: 2

      The cheaters and rote-regurgitators (just made that word up...) have effectively devalued all Indian scholarship. When you look at the questions posted on the various technical LinkedIn groups by Indian "engineers", it's immediately obvious that despite their "education" and job titles, they actually don't know anything and they don't even know how to go about learning something about what they don't know. Their attitude, overwhelmingly, is "I'm trying to do this thing, please give me the exact solution".

      --

      Less is more.

    4. Re:Worthless degrees by Anubis+IV · · Score: 2

      When I was in grad school, my research group had a round robin seminar each week, in which we'd take turns presenting conference papers that had just come out in our field (Computer Science). Given that we were all busy with other things, we mostly just skimmed through the list of recent publications, looked for interesting titles, read through a few abstracts (maybe some introductions too), and then picked a paper to present based on those facts alone.

      I recall picking one that sounded extremely interesting based on the title, and its abstract and introduction promised some great, new techniques with solid results, so I e-mailed my research group the paper I'd be presenting, then proceeded to actually read it. It was authored by a professor at an Indian university, a PhD candidate, and a Masters candidate, and had recently been published in a local IEEE conference's proceedings.

      The only problem? It had a blank spot where the methodology was supposed to be. And another blank spot in the paper where the results were supposed to be. Not just that it was light on details. It was wholly empty. Nothing. I managed to find a revised version of the paper on their website that had a paragraph in each section, but it was, as you'd imagine, rather light on any useful detail. But the conclusion stated very conclusively that their results were extremely good, and the introduction made it clear they had done something great. And it was published!

      That was the last time any of us in that research group (several of whom were Indian) bothered looking at papers published in Indian conference proceedings. And I never lived down the fact that I hadn't noticed it was entirely blank under the headings for those two sections.

  4. If everyone in government and industry cheats... by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Don't be surprised if students ask for the same thing.

    Oh, was this about India? Silly me. I thought the story was about the USA.

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  5. Some days I just can't even by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So if those with money or political influence can cheat, poorer students ask, why shouldn't they?

    Hey, if those with money or political influence can murder someone and get away with it, why shouldn't everyone be able to? It's their democratic right!

    Seriously, is this even a QUESTION? The real problem is not that you CAN'T cheat, it's that others CAN.

  6. Re:related by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Quick let's hire more of them to replace US workers. I mean, with high ethical standards like they're expressing, what could possibly go wrong?

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  7. Re:If everyone in government and industry cheats.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    It is about India, because people in India are at least honest about their graft.

  8. India... by djupedal · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Where less than 20% of the MBAs are employable. They'll do anything to get that skin, and then do nothing with it but weedle. I had to interview over 5k of them just to come up with 150 that were anywhere near hiring, and 10% of those didn't make the first six months. That figure fell to 50% after two years, as they were constantly looking for lateral moves inside the country. The country? China.

    1. Re:India... by Bogtha · · Score: 2

      I had to interview over 5k of them just to come up with 150 that were anywhere near hiring

      You interviewed five thousand people? Are you sure you have that number right? Assuming you interviewed five people a day every single working day, it would take you four years to interview that many people. That's assuming no time off, no sickness, a steady supply of candidates, etc. I know a fair number of people in HR across a few organisations, and they don't manage to interview anywhere near that many people on a regular basis.

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
  9. Re:If everyone in government and industry cheats.. by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 2

    Sigh. True that. We cheat about cheating by pretending we don't cheat.

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  10. Old Saying. by jklovanc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So if those with money or political influence can cheat, poorer students ask, why shouldn't they?"

    Two wrongs don't make a right.

    1. Re:Old Saying. by geekoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But if you need a degree to get a job, and the rich are cheating their way into straight A's.
      For all practical reason's, they are in a Hobson's Choice:
      Choose to cheat, or don't get an education.

      As usual, a simple statement 'Two wrong's don't make a right' completely ignores the problem, remove the person saying it's cognitive function from the conversation, and it completely wrong.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  11. Just cheating themselves by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sadly, most people learn this little gem of wisdom too late in life. Cheating only harms the cheater. It may mildly harm those who employ these people, but it doesn't take long for others to see despite your piece of paper, you're just an idiot who knows nothing, when you cheat.

    So I say, if that's what they want to do, let 'em. It'll bite them in the butt soon enough.

    1. Re:Just cheating themselves by FerociousFerret · · Score: 2

      And they will cheat to get the jobs. How you say? I poured over many resumes and weed out what I can see a obvious bullshit and such. Then I get them on a phone interview and ask basic questions and get really bad answers. But the outsourcing/contracting firm likes to have someone on the call, which I thought was strange but whatever. What we discovered is that the contracting firm was collecting all of our questions, getting valid answers, and then grooming the next candidate to have all the answers to our questions on the phone screen. As soon as we go "off script" from our normal questions, the phone candidate is lost.

  12. Cheated from by mrhippo3 · · Score: 2

    My wife ran close to a 4.0 undergraduate and graduate. She was also naive, having done grade school through HS at a small private women's school. In college at a large state school, the prof noticed a group of minority students that actively cheated off my wife, who always sat first row. For the final, the prof shoved my wife into a far back corner, rendering the cheating strategy impossible. The cheaters were given full opportunity to show how little they had learned. They spent the hour glaring at wife who was complying with the prof's request.
    The only time I was cheated from was in grade school. The teacher assumed (or rather confused me with) my brother who was not quite so well behaved as I. When the classmate cheated from me, she did a poor job, but she still got a higher grade than I did.
    Face it. Life is unfair.

  13. Just cheating themselves by Capt.Albatross · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Cheating only harms the cheater...

    There is one other group harmed, and quite seriously, by widespread cheating: those who have worked hard and honestly for the best diploma they can both achieve and afford, but see it devalued to worthlessness because too many holders of the same diploma are cheaters, and incompetent.

  14. Remember by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Keep this article mind when hiring your next H-1Bs over your American counterparts which undergoes extensive liberal arts and ethics education.

  15. In America by CauseBy · · Score: 3, Funny

    These Indian students should come to America. Over here we call it "freedom of speech" to cheat on things. Elections, mostly.

  16. India baffles me. by Anonanonaon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's a big country, and I'm sure there has to be some variance between values among people when you have a billion to choose from.

    But...

    Color me racist. No, please do. I really, really am.

    India is a country where unwanted children are dumped like trash into the streets, corruption is considered normal and the atmosphere of hyper-competitiveness seems to push everybody's brain into a crazed kind of fight or flight mode which hampers every other human circuit. I can't be around Indian culture without wanting to hide under furniture to escape the crazy.

    Wait. Hold on. This just in: Not racist, per se. Because, interestingly, people who are only one generation removed from that seething land mass are entirely capable of developing into excellent, entirely likable people who aren't completely batshit insane. So it's not genetic vile stupidity. It's cultural vile stupidity. Probably a lot like the heavy crime areas in the U.S. -Pull babies out of those places and raise them in bullet-free zones where people treat each other with dignity and love, and I'm sure you'll get fine, undamaged people that way also.

    So, really, I don't care what genetic material you start with, if you force people to endure pressure-cooker lives of massive over-population limited resources and shitty infrastructure, combined with the momentum of hundreds of sustained years of dog-eat-dog corruption, you're going to end up with nothing but vast yields of psychologically damaged people.

    India is a problem I don't know how to solve without basically wiping it clean of humans and starting again.

    Maybe just the cities.

    Folks in the rural areas sound less insane from the traveler's reports I've heard.

  17. Re:The Right to Get Away With It by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2

    They have the "ability" to cheat. Being "able" to do something does not make it a "right".

    Exactly. There's a lot that people have the ability to do every day though they refrain from doing so. You could walk down the street and just decide to punch everyone in the nose. That's within your ability, but most people don't do this. (Mainly because they would get in trouble for doing so and/or would encounter someone who would punch back.) You also have the ability to walk down the street handing $1 bills to everyone you meet. Again, most people don't do this (as you might quickly run out of money to give out). Sadly, too many people confuse "can do X" with "it is my right to do X."

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  18. Re:related by Peter+Simpson · · Score: 2

    Well, *that* goes a long way towards explaining why someone with an MS in computer science doesn't know who Kernighan and Ritchie are. And why they're working here for $45k.

  19. Re:Exams are bullshit by cryptizard · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That's why in pretty much all of my classes the I replace the final exam with a few class sessions at the end where each student has to give a short lecture on a topic that we have not covered in class. If you have learned what you are supposed to learn about the basics of the subject, then you can research and present advanced topics to your peers. If you haven't, then you will have a lot of trouble. And there is no way to cheat.

  20. Re:What goes around comes around... by mrchaotica · · Score: 2

    There are two kinds of accreditation. "Nationally accredited" is the bullshit minimum standard that the diploma mills meet. "Regionally accredited" has stricter requirements and is what good schools meet.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  21. Re:SNOB by cryptizard · · Score: 5, Informative

    That's an urban legend.

  22. Re:Exams are bullshit by techno-vampire · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Exams generally try to determine how you have memorized some subject, not how you can adapt what you've learned.

    Really? Let's say that you're taking the final exam for a course in Trig that consists in nothing but solving problems (and showing your work) that aren't in the text book. If all you've done is memorize the material but haven't learned how to use it, how are you going to pass the test?

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
  23. Re:If everyone in government and industry cheats.. by Darinbob · · Score: 2

    The difference perhaps is that in America we are not proud of being cheaters, or at least not yet. If we had student rallies in front of the US capital building demanding the right to cheat they'd be laughed at from both high and low society. Yet this actually happened in India and the government backed down.

  24. University Topics are one thing, but.... by abelenky17 · · Score: 2

    I'm a computer programmer, and encounter plenty of people with "various credentials" from "various nations".
    It may be frustrating and annoying, but thats life.

    However, I'm also a Private Pilot, and what truly terrified me in flight school was the foreign students who came to the USA to start on their Professional Pilot training, and cheated their way through the tests. They cheated through the written tests simply because they were goofing off and not paying attention in class.
    The tests were entirely fair and passable if you paid attention in class and did the homework. But they chose not to, cheated through the tests (were occasionally angry when they were caught.... they were *paying* a lot for this education! Didn't you know... they *deserved* to pass for how much they were paying!)

    It wasn't only the pilots. Several studying to be aircraft mechanics (in another class) were also caught cheating.
    I know a student from a Air Traffic Control program who had several Chinese nationals in her class, and they were cheating their way through.
    (not just a few questions or a few percentage points... but wholly cheating on entire exams).

    Much of Asia likely has incompetent pilots flying improperly maintained aircraft, and directed by incompetent Air Traffic Controllers. I will never fly over there after what I saw.

  25. Re:SNOB by TeknoHog · · Score: 2

    WTF? Isn't it rather the other way around? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S...

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.