Slashdot Mirror


Black IT Pros On (Lack Of) Racial Diversity In Tech

Nerval's Lobster writes While pundits and analysts debate about diversity in Silicon Valley, one thing is very clear: Black Americans make up a very small percentage of tech workers. At Facebook, Google, and Yahoo, that number is a bit less than 2 percent of their respective U.S. workforces; at Apple, it's closer to 7 percent. Many executives and pundits have argued that the educational pipeline remains one of the chief impediments to hiring a more diverse workforce, and that as long as universities aren't recruiting a broader mix of students for STEM degrees, the corporate landscape will suffer accordingly. But black IT entrepreneurs and professionals tell Dice that the problem goes much deeper than simply widening the pipeline; they argue that racial bias, along with lingering impressions of what a 'techie' should look like, loom much larger than any pipeline issue.

459 comments

  1. Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Aren't you over this charade that the every white person on the planet is a racist and that everyone and society as a whole is against you? Can you stop victimizing yourselves now?

    1. Re:Yeah, right... by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While I certainly agree that the "victim" mentality is not helpful, let's not pretend that racism is not real and pervasive. There is a lot that has to change if we want true equality, and that includes everyone. This is not an us-vs-them situation - everyone needs to work together to identify problems and make changes. In your case, actually meeting and talking frankly with real live black folks would probably go a long way towards giving you some empathy towards the situation many blacks face.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I have to ask, why do you assume a certain skin color for me, and why do you assume I have never socialized with a black person? Plot twist: I'm Asian American, happily married to a Surinamese woman. We're living in an immigrant-dense semi-suburban area in Rotterdam, The Netherlands, filled with pretty much everything but ethnic Europeans.

    3. Re:Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the best you could belch up as a contribution to the argument is that people should not be entitled to an opinion unless they attach a name to it then you have my sympathies.

    4. Re:Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Do you go by CaptianDork at work? I thought so. Your point is made. Carry on.

    5. Re:Yeah, right... by Triklyn · · Score: 1

      wtf? I have literally never heard of surinam... how the fuck did you find someone from a country on the ass end of south america?

      also... wtf happened to your life? you need to calm the fuck down. I see way too many nationality/ethnicity flavored adjectives in that post.

      stop being so global.

    6. Re:Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously didn't RTFA. Here's a few quotes for you to dwell on:

      While it can be frustrating to be considered the “other” in a community when you are simply a techie at heart, Westley believes that black IT professionals have to be willing to step outside of their comfort zone, appear at conferences, and develop a proactive plan to get ahead: “You can’t simply keep your nose to the grindstone. Yes, race is still a problem. You have to make sure to deal with it on your own terms. You can’t be too sensitive either and misinterpret something. It’s all very personal.

      Greenlee thinks the onus is on blacks currently working in tech to make themselves as visible as they can to help influence those numbers: “One of the keys to making inroads and stomping the digital divide is to help change the perception of what we and others think a computer scientist can look like.

      . The Urban Tech Fair does multi-city and virtual programming, offering tech workshops, entrepreneur showcases, and STEM events. Jacqueline Taylor-Adams, chairperson and CMO for the fair, says it’s meant to “showcase the talent, resources, and innovation that exists in our own backyard and community.”

      The article briefly acknowledges that black IT workers face some racism, but that is not the thrust of the article. The article is about what black IT workers and entrepreneurs are needing to do in order to raise their profile in IT to encourage other blacks to consider IT careers.They recognized that the best way to do that is to showcase talent from their community.

    7. Re:Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Surinam used to be a Dutch colony, today the Netherlands have A LOT of Surinamese 1st, 2nd and 3rd generation immigrants. I moved to Rotterdam for work, met my wife here.

    8. Re:Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So basically, you have no experience with the lives of Black Americans?

      And probably little with Americans at all.

      Why don't you try a trip through Birmingham, Alabama, or even better, the rural areas of the state?

    9. Re:Yeah, right... by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While I certainly agree that the "victim" mentality is not helpful, let's not pretend that racism is not real and pervasive.

      "Real", yes, absolutely. Pervasive in hiring decisions for tech workers? I don't think so. It really does not make any sense. It is certainly something that I have seen zero evidence of from many years in the tech world - just the opposite, in fact. You could say it's pervasive in traffic stops (and that is something that we should try to fix), but uniformed cops don't hire programmers.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    10. Re:Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I haven't actually. In fact I've notice the exact opposite. But I HAVE noticed that "Did you notice" statements about the above statement are only ever made by truly racist people.

    11. Re: Yeah, right... by itsphilip · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Because he doesn't believe there's systemic racism he's a troll? Most middle and upper middle class (read: educated) white folks really aren't racist at all. At this point, maybe blacks are still looking for excuses why they can't broadly succeed. As an employer, I try to hire the most qualified candidate whenever possible, but also the best cultural fit. Often times, black dudes are the coolest, funnest, nicest people you can hire and are far less political and catty than their white counterparts. In my experience, they don't fan flames or get in office politics or tell on people or try to strategically fuck their coworkers just to get a minor advantage. Just my opinion.

    12. Re: Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You meant every white *man*. Frankly I don't see these artificial barriers, if people don't find a certain profession or line of work interesting - they won't go into it. It's that simple. Attitudes have changed so quickly but people live a hundred years.

    13. Re:Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I certainly agree that the "victim" mentality is not helpful,

      You're a bit mistaken here. Yeah, I get it, you've probably seen people blame their self-made problems on somebody else.

      I've seen that too. I've also seen people tear themselves inside out trying to fix themselves when the problem was beyond their control or influence. Or blaming themselves for another's flaws. I suppose you could try to argue that it was always their own fault to their way of thinking, but let's not stretch the point that far.

      What I'm trying to say is, you have to know when you are a victim and impotent just about as often as recognizing you can make a difference.

      Otherwise you might blame yourself when swept up in an inexorable tide.

    14. Re: Yeah, right... by squiggleslash · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Because he doesn't believe there's systemic racism he's a troll? Most middle and upper middle class (read: educated) white folks really aren't racist at all

      Just a note: systemic discrimination operates independently of individual discrimination.

      As an example, a business or industry that recruits heavily through word-of-mouth recommendations is likely to end up with a systematic racism problem, because even though the individuals within the system may be well meaning and totally non-racist, any existing disparity, however slight, in social or employment circles, will get cemented, or even amplified given a non-zero percentage of employees will discriminate, by such a strategy.

      Given the number of documented and easy to find ways in which systematic racism and individual racism exists, it's not hard to believe someone claiming it doesn't is not being honest.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    15. Re:Yeah, right... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      You either misunderstand or are mischaracterizing the situation.

      Virtually no one says that all white people are racists.

      There is an element of racism in western society and in general white people benefit from it.

      I'm not saying that it's an excuse for failure or that it makes certain bad decisions any less bad but let's not kid ourselves about the fact that it's reality.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    16. Re:Yeah, right... by Frobnicator · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, according to government statistics, the "Percent Black or African-American" represent about 7.1% of 2011 graduates and about 7.4% of the workforce, and both are trending upwards. Compare the roughly 7.4% of black computer programmers with 10.8% of the general population. So a smaller percent of the population get the training, but those who get the training are not discriminated against for hiring purposes. (Not talking about wages, just hiring diversity.)

      From the same report with a 10-year granularity, females make up about 33.9% of the 2011 graduates and about 26.6% of the computer programming workforce. Women are also making up an increasing number of the workforce that changes based on age. The report notes "these estimates could be consistent with an age effect. That is, when women are young, they are more likely to be employed in STEM, but as they age, they move out of STEM employment." The trend lines show 35-year-old females in the group as a growing population, with the growth dropping rapidly by age groups. Compare that with the 48% females in the general national workforce. So in hiring diversity women do make up a lower number by diversity but it is largely by their own choice rather than hiring discrimination.

      One of the real problems with the gender gap is that many times it is a sign of wealth or poverty -- that is, in various demographics of wealthy households and poor households women are not part of the workforce. It forms a bell-shaped curve. Poor mothers ($90K) the line starts to rapidly drop again. So splitting out the numbers, if the individuals are making $30K-$50K then often the mother is educated and also the mother works. But once the family has highly paid workers, with the husband highly paid making >$90K then the women again tend to stay home with children rapidly trending back down to about 43% working once you've crossed the roughly $150K husband's income. Since the tech field is very highly paid that puts the gender gap as a voluntary choice, not an involuntary hiring discrimination.

      Based both on what I have seen and also what I have read in various reports, the problem (if there is one) is at the source end of the education pipeline. When it comes to "Black or African American" demographics the number of graduates and number of workers is at parity. When it comes to females, the numbers are that women who choose to stick with the field are readily employed and that many women leave as they age at a rate far more rapid than other fields.

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    17. Re:Yeah, right... by Frobnicator · · Score: 2

      Argh, didn't proofread my edits and two links broke the gender gap paragraph. Forgot that greater than and less then signs get treated as html blocks and get eaten.

      From various reports the first one in a tab I closed, the second one like this we get stats. Poor mothers, UNDER $25K, usually stay at home. About 45% work. Once the individuals in the family make between $30K to $60K each it is common for both to work, with 77% of mothers in the workforce. But once they enter the "highly paid" range of over $90K of husband's salary the mothers start to tend to stay home, and once the husbands hit $150K it drops back to 43% of the women working. A large part of the gender gap in tech jobs comes from worker choice, not employer bias.

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    18. Re:Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      OP here. As I stated earlier, I'm Asian American. 26 years in NY feels like long enough.

    19. Re:Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod this -1 Kumbayaa

    20. Re:Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Captain DOUCHE is more like it.

    21. Re:Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If IT racism is so pervasive, why do I work with so many Indians, Asians and Latin American/Mexican people? Does racism only happen to African-Americans? Ever think it could be a cultural issue within that community? Being a smart geek is somewhat less admired there from what I've seen. Peer pressure is also real and pervasive by the way...

    22. Re:Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God dammit.
      Now I want to know who you are (or rather who your wife is).
      I'm also from suriname and live in delft.

    23. Re:Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The racists (and sexists) who care only about skin color (and gender) are out in force on Slashdot recently.

      No one cares about your skin color or gender. Get over it and take responsibility for yourself and your own choices.

      Is eye color in tech representative of the population as a whole? Come on.

    24. Re:Yeah, right... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      When I worked for Cisco as a contractor in Silicon Valley last year, it was Indians vs. everyone else. That meant vegan pizzas at group events since Indians aren't meat eaters like Americans. As a fat white boy, I don't have a problem being a minority (except I don't like vegan pizzas).

    25. Re:Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "There is a lot that has to change if we want true equality, and that includes everyone"

      There is never ever going to be a time when everyone treats everyone equally. That is not in any way even a desirable state.

    26. Re:Yeah, right... by disambiguated · · Score: 2

      It really does not make any sense.

      I totally agree. I've conducted dozens of interviews for software engineers. I couldn't hire a black developer if my life depended on it -- I've never had a black candidate. I know the recruiters aren't to blame -- they're desperate for qualified candidates. There were no black people in my university classes either. The dearth of women in IT gets plenty of headlines, but I've known lots of women programmers, including 3 bosses over the years. In my entire career, I've only ever known one black programmer.

      It must start long before high school.

    27. Re:Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So basically, you have no experience with the lives of Black Americans?

      And probably little with Americans at all.

      Why don't you try a trip through Birmingham, Alabama, or even better, the rural areas of the state?

      Waffle House, FTW!

    28. Re:Yeah, right... by Aerokii · · Score: 2

      How DARE someone point out that racism still exists and can negatively impact trying to get into college/get a job?!

      'cause I don't see a single item in the summary or article that says all white people are personally to blame, or even racists.

    29. Re:Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There were a few studies where they submitted/reviewed/ranked the same resumes with different names.
      The resumes with female names ranked lower than the same resume with a male name.
      Resumes with "black" sounding names didn't get called back for an interview.
      If you're not a minority it will seem very odd that there is pervasive and real issues facing minorities.
      There are many many more studies that show all sort of bias in just about every working relationship:
      from funding, hiring, training, etc. You just have to look for them.

      The biggest issue is the fear that many under qualified minority workers will take the jobs of highly qualified majority workers. I don't agree that the problem is serious because there are more high-tech jobs than people, there are so few minorities seeking positions, and everyone improves with experience etc. Highly successful companies with large numbers of open positions should bend over backwards to hire minority workers because they can afford it and it is better for society in the long run. (Yeah, I know companies only care about their profit and not about society but still a rising tide lifts all boats).

      The high-tech education problem is a passion problem.
      Most kids will choose to spend 60 hours a week playing halo over making halo.
      EA, Apple, Sony, Netflix etc market heavily to convince consumers to make them wealthy;
      Maybe our industry needs to market high-tech work along with their core product.
      Imagine if every iphone started with a video that showed the people who made it
      and talked about how important it is for more people to seek out a high-tech career.

    30. Re:Yeah, right... by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      I can recall three in as many decades. One was one of my favorite female bosses.

    31. Re: Yeah, right... by Dave+Emami · · Score: 1

      As an example, a business or industry that recruits heavily through word-of-mouth recommendations is likely to end up with a systematic racism problem, because even though the individuals within the system may be well meaning and totally non-racist

      Racism is a belief (note the ism). Whether or not it exists is based on what individuals think -- in the case of racism, thinking that the goodness/badness or other attributes of an individual are defined by their race. A system cannot hold a belief, therefore there can be no such thing as "systemic" racism. Bad results can be caused by racism, but they cannot themselves be racism. Otherwise, a meteor striking a mostly-black-populated neighborhood would be "racist."

      To give a flips-side illustration, consider Don Sterling, owner of the LA Clippers team, who was in the news a while back when he made racist slurs. Despite there being no negative impact (there were lots of black players on the Clippers, earning lots of money), he was still a racist, because of his beliefs.

      --

      "The Greens lynched a hacker in Chicago. Last month, but I think the body's still hanging from the old Water Tower."
    32. Re: Yeah, right... by stdarg · · Score: 2

      I don't think your example is overt enough to be considered discrimination.

      http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/syste...

      Examples of systemic practices include: discriminatory barriers in recruitment and hiring; discriminatorily restricted access to management trainee programs and to high level jobs; exclusion of qualified women from traditionally male dominated fields of work; disability discrimination such as unlawful pre-employment inquiries; age discrimination in reductions in force and retirement benefits; and compliance with customer preferences that result in discriminatory placement or assignments.

      A special "fast track to management" program for newly hired college grads is an example of systemic discrimination because it's restricted (e.g. discriminatory) to something that correlates strongly with age, putting older workers at a disadvantage for promotion to management.

      If you changed your example so that ONLY word of mouth was used for hiring, and you COULD NOT be hired without a recommendation from an existing person, that would be systemic.

      The whole point of "systemic" discrimination is that there's a system in place to enforce it.

    33. Re:Yeah, right... by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      whos they? reviewed how? what names? links?
      no?

    34. Re:Yeah, right... by stdarg · · Score: 1

      Nice citation of actual data.

      This is another example where it would be incredibly useful and beneficial to society for everybody to have an understanding of statistics. I really wish it would become a requirement for high school graduation, in place of geometry perhaps if we have to sacrifice another math topic.

    35. Re:Yeah, right... by ArhcAngel · · Score: 2

      Why don't you try a trip through Birmingham, Alabama

      No need...The gang from Top Gear did it for him.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    36. Re:Yeah, right... by stdarg · · Score: 1

      There is an element of racism in western society and in general white people benefit from it.

      That's incredibly vague. You know, there is also an element of black racism in western society and in general black people benefit from it. Also, there is an element of Asian racism in western society and in general Asian people benefit from it. But of course, we can't forget that there is an element of Native American racism in western society and in general Native Americans benefit from it.

      Seriously, every group has "an element" of racism that goes to help other members of that group. Not just based on race, but religion, alma mater, sports team allegiance, etc.

      The people who talk about "white male supremacy in society" though are not talking about "an element" -- they generally see it as pervasive and responsible for most or all of the problems faced by minorities and women.

    37. Re:Yeah, right... by stdarg · · Score: 1

      Racism certainly exists. Look at racist programs like affirmative action in university admissions. Thankfully, popular support for such programs is low and the courts are slowly but surely striking down the more overtly racist programs throughout the country.

    38. Re:Yeah, right... by msobkow · · Score: 1

      Real? Sure.

      But perhaps you can explain why it's only the blacks who cry "victim" instead of the Indians, First Nations, Asians, Hispanics, etc.?

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    39. Re:Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, it really isn't. I wouldn't even expect you to have much grasp of the lives of other people in New York state (really, a life on Long Island is quite different from the Finger Lakes to give a random example), or even the Northeast United State, let alone the rest of the country.

      Seriously, it is bad when some politician wants to tell me they feel for me, but they're living in an isolated world, you don't have to pretend to it yourself. You're not running for office. I won't ask you to kiss any babies either.

    40. Re:Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it will not go away until we burn all POC people and then they'll have a legitimate reason to call us racist.

    41. Re: Yeah, right... by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      As an example, a business or industry that recruits heavily through word-of-mouth recommendations is likely to end up with a systematic racism problem

      Dude, that TOTALLY explains why my career in the NBA never even got off the ground. Tell me - who do I complain to?

    42. Re:Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It is impossible to explain something that is not true.

      I can find a dozen cases of Indians, First Nations, Asians and Hispanics claiming discrimination. Not to mention women, Muslims, Christians and yes, your standard WASP.

      But maybe you can explain why you believe something that you could easily see is not true?

      Or did you not bother look and see about it?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism_in_the_United_States
      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/21/hispanics-face-most-discr_n_583538.html
      http://indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com/2014/04/21/supreme-court-discrimination-against-native-america-cannot-be-tolerated
      http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2013/09/16/miss-america-pageant-puts-indian-americans-in-the-spotlight/

      I'd bother with more links, but why?

    43. Re:Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be honest, I didn't see them speak to a single person of color.

      I barely saw any in the background.

    44. Re:Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vegan pizzas seem like a waste of time (iirc Vegans don't do cheese?).

      Vegetarian pizzas? Fine, no problem.

    45. Re: Yeah, right... by gtall · · Score: 1

      And for management, it also helps if you are 6 foot or taller male and glib. Bonus points if it looks like your hair will turn silver over the years (Dilbert reference).

    46. Re:Yeah, right... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      No, but it's certainly within reason to treat skin color a lot more like eye color.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    47. Re:Yeah, right... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Does racism only happen to African-Americans?

      No, but the history and experience of blacks in the US is very different from those other groups. When is the last time anyone moved to the other side of the street to avoid an Asian guy?

      Ever think it could be a cultural issue within that community?

      I'd be a fool to deny that is a factor. As I said, everyone needs to make changes.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    48. Re:Yeah, right... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I agree completely that one needs to recognize that outside forces are allied against you - but giving up never helped anyone.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    49. Re:Yeah, right... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I was referring to the US - I have no idea what it's like in Rotterdam.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    50. Re:Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really wish it would become a requirement for high school graduation

      Some would probably argue that it would be a racist and sexist proposition to make it a requirement for HS graduation, due to disparate impact and data showing an association between gender and race and apparent performance in certain subjects.

    51. Re:Yeah, right... by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      NYC is one of the most diverse and accepting places in the whole US. I lived there for about 5 years. You should know very well that a drive 100 miles south to Philly or up to Boston would have a very different atmosphere - to say nothing of the deep south.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    52. Re:Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vegan pizzas seem like a waste of time (iirc Vegans don't do cheese?).

      Vegetarian pizzas? Fine, no problem.

      Indeed. Sacred cows aren't politically correct in veganism either. Much less pouring milk over cow idols.

      I never understood veganism. If you think that milking cows is cruel, have you ever hear what they say when you don't milk them?

      And did you think that the sterile eggs that we buy at the store would have hatched if they'd just been left lying on the ground?

    53. Re:Yeah, right... by stdarg · · Score: 2

      Yes, because affirmative action is an overtly racist government program. You're linking to a bunch of individual racist incidents, like a political exit poll that asks questions that offended some people. Considering that the poll was designed to *measure racism*, it's kind of stupid to even count that as being racist in and of itself, don't you think?

    54. Re:Yeah, right... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      This was in Freakonomics, IIRC.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    55. Re:Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      let's not pretend that racism is not real

      Oh, it's totally real. Still occurs in big cities and small towns. First sign we had that my aunt was getting dementia was when she started spouting racist speech that was normal back when she was a little girl and she horrified herself when she realized what she said.

      and pervasive.

      That's where you and I differ. It was pervasive 20-30 years ago, and worse before that. But 20-30 years ago, it would be common for a white person to talk to another white person about a person of another color using racial slurs and stereotypes either jokingly or in anger. Nowadays you'd be hard pressed to find a racist, and the kids live mostly post-racism lives. Inter-racial dating happens without any realization that it was taboo or even illegal just one generation prior. The kids hear about racism in school and start to believe that it's a cause for little mishaps in their lives. Sure, there are still some old racists around. Those 50+ folks who learned a certain way when they were younger. But they know now that it's socially unacceptable, so they're dwindling like the Sith during the height of the Jedi's power in the Republic. Don't expect a resurgence unless it's artificially manufactured by media outlets, like with Ferguson MO.

    56. Re:Yeah, right... by Aerokii · · Score: 1

      The articles linked apply to the article here on Slashdot just about as much as affirmative action does- and beyond that, several of those links were more than individual incidents but instead included data over time regarding systemic racism. In regards to the "poll question", I'd say yes, it's racist to ask to ask if "blacks are being too demanding of equal rights." The fact one must DEMAND equal rights at all because they are not being received is a huge problem on its own, and the phrasing there just reinforces a negative image that's pandering to a racist demographic.

      All that being said, I don't really think affirmative action is a useful tool for what it's designed for- but when we're discussing an article talking about diversity in tech, attempting to derail it with "but... but 'reverse racism' unrelated to this topic!" isn't really all that helpful or useful.

    57. Re:Yeah, right... by Sarius64 · · Score: 1

      I talk with real Black members of my family, my friends, my peers, my customers, and the people at my favorite lunch shop. You're an idiot.

    58. Re:Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because you want to continue to blame literally anyone else doesn't mean you're correct. Statistics do not fit every situation.

    59. Re: Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Father a drug addict, mother abandoned us, joined the military to get away, went to school and made something better of my life in IT. No one gave a shit what my melanin content was.

    60. Re:Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm no spring chicken, but even 20-30 years ago, I grew up in a white environment where racial slurs were not done, as it was viewed as obscene, and did more demeaning to one's self (showing they were uneducated) than actually insulting the person of said race.

      The litmus test of this was the fact where I didn't realize until I was well in college (early 1990s) that interracial dating was considered a bad thing by some.

    61. Re:Yeah, right... by stdarg · · Score: 1

      If you read the article about the poll question, it was designed to measure racism. So of course the questions are probing racist sentiments. It's not racist to find out if someone is racist, that doesn't make sense.

      Also, I didn't bring up affirmative action in response to the article. I responded to your comment about "how dare someone question whether racism exists" -- that's much more general than the article, where racism against black IT pros is the subject.

    62. Re: Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's funny because my melanin content gets tested for every job I apply for, of course I'm a sunscreen tester so maybe that's why!

    63. Re: Yeah, right... by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      Racism is a belief (note the ism). Whether or not it exists is based on what individuals think -- in the case of racism, thinking that the goodness/badness or other attributes of an individual are defined by their race. A system cannot hold a belief, therefore there can be no such thing as "systemic" racism. Bad results can be caused by racism, but they cannot themselves be racism.

      My first reaction to this is that you sound like a guy who is stuck in a highway traffic jam caused because some idiot tailgated some other guy and someone else cut someone off suddenly causing everyone to brake -- and this caused a traffic wave which lasted for 15 minutes, but you're like, "Hmm -- yeah, tailgating doesn't exist anymore in our traffic system. It's been completely gone for at least 15 minutes." Even if racism no longer exists anywhere in the hiring structure (which is a doubtful premise), it doesn't mean that the "traffic" just instantly fixes itself. Its effects can linger for a long time. So, our various social institutions, educational institutions, etc. may still have gaps in black/white interaction caused by previous generations of racists, and without actively fighting to overcome these things, we may continue to propagate effects that keep the older division alive.

      I'm not saying this is always a huge effect, but it does exist -- and it ultimately was caused by racism. It just may take effort to recognize where those gaps still exist and make sure they don't propagate (or take actions to change it), rather than just "doing things like everybody does" and intentionally keeping the status quo.

      But the bigger issue is that it really doesn't take an overt KKK conspiracy to introduce something that begins to skew things significantly. A LOT of people seem to harbor subtly racist views when you hear them talk in unguarded ways. It's less common among younger people, but I've been really shocked a number of times in my life when someone I've known for years comes out with a "Well, I'm not racist... but..." line, which usually is followed by something that is in fact racist, even if it's not of the extreme KKK variety. Or even people attempting to pay a race a compliment (as actually is seen in a number of threads here), where it becomes clear that people are actually making some sort of significant correlation with race that can cause other judgments to be skewed.

      It's not the guy in the pointy white hood that usually causes "systemic racism," but rather the guy on the hiring committee who just makes a decision based on someone who "seems more like me" or a decision which assumes that someone will "fit into our culture better," where that "culture" is more assumptions based on race than any actual evidence from an interview or whatever.

      As humans, we inherently look for patterns. We're obviously going to see associations between people who look alike. And given the fact that races often tend to self-segregate and thereby create cultural differences, there is often some truth to the fact that it's more probable that someone who looks like someone else will have oter cultural aspects in common.

      But that's of course not generally causative -- it's just a correlation, and it's not always true. But lots and lots of studies seem to show that people who are not overtly racist often can make judgments about other people that could have racist repercussions.

      Whether that's caused by actual beliefs of people who just don't talk about them, or whether it's a deeper cognitive issue, the fact is that many otherwise nice people end up acting in racist ways. And other individuals don't. Denying that such problems exist is not helpful in leading us all to become more like the people who don't seem to have as many inherent biases.

    64. Re:Yeah, right... by psmears · · Score: 1

      Vegan pizzas seem like a waste of time (iirc Vegans don't do cheese?).

      Vegetarian pizzas? Fine, no problem.

      The majority religion in India is Hinduism; many adherents do not eat meat or eggs, but will generally eat dairy products, including cheese. So yes, vegetarian rather than vegan :-)

    65. Re:Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know why, but I work with a fair number of Indians and they always want buffalo chicken pizza. Quite a number of them will happily eat anything and the number of vegans is definitely lower than if you took all of the females in the company and looked at the percentage of vegans among them.

    66. Re:Yeah, right... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      You clearly don't talk about anything that matters if you still don't have some empathy for their situation.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    67. Re:Yeah, right... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      It was pervasive 20-30 years ago, and worse before that.

      Heh, if you are old like me that doesn't seem very long ago. :)

      And most of the managers are my age or older...

      I fully agree that this attitude will dwindle away, but it is still among us. And just because it no longer exists in a 20-something's world does not mean that their manager is not acting on his/her 30-years-ago social conditioning.

      Things change fast... when I left Philly in 2005, my wife and I would get harassed walking down the street. We'd get questions like, "How did YOU two meet?" or, "What do you guys actually have in common?" - as if we were a different species. We moved back in 2009 and that had largely disappeared. The millennials have their shit together on this score.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    68. Re:Yeah, right... by nbauman · · Score: 1

      "There is a lot that has to change if we want true equality, and that includes everyone"

      There is never ever going to be a time when everyone treats everyone equally. That is not in any way even a desirable state.

      I would be happy to have a Scandinavian or German level of opportunity and (lack of) poverty. As you may know, there is more social mobility in those countries than in the U.S. [Citation omitted, go look it up yourself on Google]

      And there are studies that show that countries like that with more equality have higher GNP, better health outcomes, etc.

      I'd be happy to have a free education system like we did in New York City with City College and Brooklyn College, where admission was based on test scores and high school grades, rather than on your dad's ability to pay huge expenses. That was a real meritocracy. The smartest kids in NYC went to CCNY, regardless of race or religion. CCNY has a wall with photos of graduates who went on to get Nobel prizes, or (like Andy Grove) created Silicon Valley. If you read their Nobel autobiographies, you see that some of them were rich kids, but most of them were working class kids whose fathers were tailors or grocers, who would have gone on to do the same if college wasn't free.

    69. Re:Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shows how much you know. It is in fact true that every white person is a racist. Just like every other person. It's natural human tendency, and the only way we'll overcome it is to admit it's there in the first place.

    70. Re: Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would be very, very careful in trusting anything conclusios Glad we'll makes about anything. In his own words, he's a pop author whose audience knows they can't trust his conclusions. Yeah, right.

      http://m.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304713704579093090254007968?mobile=year

    71. Re: Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if it were an issue of skin color only, why am I working with some very dark South Asians and Sri Lankans?

      Come work with us. I promise you, I will be more racist to the south Asians who are woefully unqualified and have a culture of cheating than I will if you have technical chops. I fully admit it may be a challenge to get by our recruiters though. I'm also racist against them, the incompetent white fucks.

    72. Re: Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For future reference, you were doing pretty well until the star wars reference. It makes you sound like an overgrown child. Also, those movies don't exist. You know that.

    73. Re: Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that conclusion is what Chris Rock recently mentioned as one of the bad parts of his black experience. In his words, he doesn't want to be groundbreaking. He wants some license to suck, like any white person. Not everyone has to be Jackie Robinson.

    74. Re: Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is that unfortunate condition though that what lots of white males recognize as "normal" is what society considers normal. Don't call it racism or sexism so as to avoid that stigma, but there is a reason why a man taking his wife's last name in marriage is "unusual."

    75. Re: Yeah, right... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Maybe, but Malcolm Gladwell also did not write Freakonomics.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    76. Re:Yeah, right... by zwarte+piet · · Score: 1

      Also referred to as 'Dutch Guyana', it's not exactly a high profile country, but one colorful mess of a city callled Paramaribo, surrounded by tropical jungle on one side and the Atlantic on the other. They talk an extra juicy variant of Dutch and something the locals call "negro english" (which sounds nothing like english).

    77. Re:Yeah, right... by zwarte+piet · · Score: 1

      South american people are technically also Americans...

    78. Re: Yeah, right... by kenh · · Score: 1

      Companies can only hire those minorities that apply, and no one thinks companies should hire unqualified applicants, do they? Of course not.

      So the datapoint I want to have is this - for every minority critics argue is 'under-represented' in IT I'd like to know what percentage of that minority have graduated with college degrees in the fields they are being 'under-represented' in. While blacks, as an example, may represent 20% of the population, do we know that there are sufficient black college graduates to staff 20% of all existing IT positions?

      --
      Ken
    79. Re: Yeah, right... by kenh · · Score: 1

      Guyana - isn't that where Papillion escaped from?

      Isn't that where Jim Jones took all his followers when they left San Francisco?

      --
      Ken
    80. Re: Yeah, right... by kenh · · Score: 1

      By that same logic, so are Canadians - assuming everyone is cool with equating nationality to their continent, not their nation of origin...

      --
      Ken
    81. Re: Yeah, right... by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      That's Guyana, which is to the west of Surinam "Dutch Guiana."

    82. Re: Yeah, right... by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Wow.

    83. Re: Yeah, right... by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      You have to be careful of the "cultural fit" qualifier there. It's a little too easy to turn that into "I want to hire people who look like me, talk like me, have the same interests as me." It can easily lead to a monoculture.

    84. Re: Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That isn't racism.
        It's not fair, but life isn't.

    85. Re:Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay. Let's talk R&B, Rap, Soul and so on in music industry. The over-representation of blacks. Surely there must be some bias against whites and simply expanding the pipe won't work. We need to talk about the lingering impressions of what a rapper should look like.

      Any way. I think you get my point. The way people look, is in fact directly influenced by the way they think and their interests.

    86. Re:Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you're really feeling brave, put your money where your mouth is, and try a trip through Detroit.

    87. Re: Yeah, right... by Ixpath · · Score: 1

      In my experience this is generally true for large companies, but not true for the many bro-tastic startups. They won't be overtly racist, there will just be a vague reference to being "not a culture fit". Even if everyone doesn't do it, it does make it marginally harder to get your foot in the door in the valley.

    88. Re:Yeah, right... by quenda · · Score: 1

      Resumes with "black" sounding names didn't get called back for an interview.

      Those names say much more than race. They indicate lower-class parents - less educated and intelligent.
      Smart middle-class parents, black or white, generally do not give their kids made-up or deliberately mis-spelled names.

      It may not be fair to visit the sins of the fathers on the job applicant, but neither is it evidence of racism.

    89. Re: Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canadians are also Americans, you just happen to be a yank.

    90. Re: Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most middle and upper middle class (read: educated) white folks really aren't racist at all.

      Most of them don't THINK they're racist.

      Talk to black people about their actual experiences and you'll learn about how racist a lot of them really are in practice.

    91. Re:Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So racism is just an issue that "blacks face"? Seems like a racist assumptioin... If racism is a problem, it is a problem for all races.

      Also you conflate the issue of equality ("if we want true equality"). We can have inequality without racism. Maybe you don't want that. Maybe you want equality under the law or maybe you want equal outcomes (typically, inequality under the law).

    92. Re:Yeah, right... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I do agree that racism still lingers and affects minorities in a lot of facets of life; for instance, in dealing with cops, black people have had to learn very different tactics than white people because doing otherwise gets them shot dead.

      However, for this, I think they're being ridiculous. If you want to know where there's no IT pros of any particular group, it's simple: go to the schools that churn out these pros, and look at who's in the classes. Do you see many black students there? If the answer is no, then there's your answer: there aren't any black IT pros because there aren't any black people going to school for it. Same with women.

      Now if you want to investigate why women or black people or hispanic people aren't going to school for tech degrees, you'll need to do a serious sociological study, which you can probably get a PhD for. But this isn't something you can blame anyone in the industry for. People in the industry have no control over who goes to school for tech-related degrees; they can only hire people who are qualified, and the pool of qualified applicants is limited to people who have the proper educational background and degrees.

    93. Re:Yeah, right... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      This thing with the black names sounds like BS to me. Was this study confined to tech jobs, or was it all jobs? If it wasn't confined to tech jobs, then it's irrelevant.

      I have no doubt that in many industries, having a "black" name will make it harder to get an interview. But that doesn't mean it's true in all industries, particularly the tech industry. There certainly isn't much trouble with people with "Indian" names (like Swapnil, Ravishankar, etc.) getting interviews, and lots of companies are desperate to hire anyone who's qualified.

    94. Re:Yeah, right... by Sarius64 · · Score: 1

      I clearly have plenty of empathy for their situation. The point is that they are not your punching bag because you feel so.

    95. Re:Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I served in the Army in the computer tech field, two classes became apparent...

      Those who worked tirelessly to understand the technical field, who understood that the Army was a means to getting experience for the Corporate world.
      And those who choose not to learn the computer field and just do enough to get by.

      We all had the same opportunity, I was a very unsuccessful soldier but a very successful techy.
      My best friends were those that challenged themselves to learn about computers as much as they could, black, white, latino, etc. I did not distinguish them based on racial characteristics.

      My friends all left the Military and had successful careers....

      Unfortunately the one that did just enough to get by were not...

      In my experience most of those laid back people were on government assistance prior to joining the military and had a sense of entitlement...
      By and large these were mostly black men from inner cities.

      This is just my experience, but to me it shows how the government can steal ambition through the creation of a welfare state.

    96. Re:Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vegan pizza? Basically, toast.

    97. Re: Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Down town Detroit really isn't bad. Lots of up and coming stuff there. Outer ring of the city though.. I hope you brought your piece.

    98. Re: Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you argue with the "culture fit"?

      I would not fit in at a Vietnamese nail salon. I am totally comfortable with that, and wouldn't begrudge them for hiring a sweet elderly Vietnamese woman over a fat, white creeper like me.

    99. Re: Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Most middle and upper middle class (read: educated) white folks really aren't racist at all"...... and you know this because you're not white and most of your friends are middle and upper middle class (read: educated) white folks? Did not think so. I'm not saying all white folk are racist or that all non white folk are non-racist. There are A**holes of all colors all around the world. The chances of a white man getting shot, just for being white in the US are however lower than the chances of a black man getting shot just for being black. This will vary depending on geographical location but it does tell a lot about the nature of the problem.

    100. Re:Yeah, right... by superwiz · · Score: 1

      While I certainly agree that the "victim" mentality is not helpful, let's not pretend that racism is not real and pervasive.

      Ok, as long as we agree that simple pride is not racism. The main commodity in tech development is attention span. Anyone who thinks that many would bother with outside priorities like ethnic or racial background is kidding themselves. Vi vs Emacs was about as heated as tech bias got and even that has largely gone away now.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    101. Re:Yeah, right... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      No, but the history and experience of blacks in the US is very different from those other groups. When is the last time anyone moved to the other side of the street to avoid an Asian guy?

      I expect the people who have been mugged by Asian gang bangers, or know people who have, will cross the street to avoid them.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    102. Re: Yeah, right... by zwarte+piet · · Score: 1

      And French Guyana to the east, wich is completely different, basically France in the tropics.

    103. Re: Yeah, right... by zwarte+piet · · Score: 1

      Your nation would be United States of America, so you're already doing that if you don't call yourself a United Statian.

    104. Re: Yeah, right... by zwarte+piet · · Score: 1

      And historically, Yankees would be the Dutch settlers who alll had names like 'Jan' and 'Kees'.

    105. Re: Yeah, right... by zwarte+piet · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm cool with being called European rather than Dutch national. Also easier for my youngest son who was born from a Finnish mother in France.

    106. Re:Yeah, right... by dave-man · · Score: 1

      Sorry. I think you are incorrect. My experience is that unlike other minorities I have worked for and had work for me, that American Blacks are the most racist of any ethnic group. Blacks hire people who look like them more than any other ethnic group. Look at the numbers on a micro level and there is a cultural problem, at least in the United States.

      --
      Bill Gates is a communist -- he's just more equal than the rest of us.
    107. Re:Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. The left will continue to exploit the blacks until they wake up and realize they have been had. Which is starting to happen...

    108. Re:Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you want diversity AND equality. That will never work.

      People find comfort in being part of group, be it people of the same interest, religion, race, etc. Some groups of people have different interests than others. That is diversity.

      When diversity causes inequality why should we try to force equality. Allowing people to be diverse is not racism.

    109. Re: Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While they may not be OVERT racists, they quickly take advantage of white privilege which translates into a significant tailwind. The fact is it is harder for Blacks to break into certain tech fields. I say that instead of standing at the door and begging whites to open the door Blacks need to make NEW doors and change the conversation.

    110. Re:Yeah, right... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      As I said, there are changes that need to occur all around. Having a pissing contest over what group is more or less racist does very little to engender trust. Everyone is tribal - it's part of human nature.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    111. Re:Yeah, right... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Yes, that is true. But most of us don't spend much time hanging around "gang bangers" in any form.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    112. Re:Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey just the type of response we would expect from you people!
      Thanks for maintaining the status quo!

    113. Re:Yeah, right... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Another example is Katrina. I watched in astonishment as people did not flee the hurricane. I watched as they complained that the government was "only giving them cold meals" after plucking them from rooftops.

      But in retrospect, I should not have been astonished. These people are the result of 4 generations or so where they are completely dependent on the government for everything. We (and I use that term loosely, since I don't live in LA) have completely failed those people. Their lives completely suck, at least in part because of the way we "help" them.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    114. Re:Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry you "feel" that way but I have found myself thinking along the same lines. Interviews for our last job opening had 4 white applicants and 1 black applicant. The black applicant was selected. Now, I assume that means he was genuinely the best fit for the position, but I suppose you think it's because we only prefer to hire black people, right?

    115. Re:Yeah, right... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I don't think I'm trying to "blame" the industry. But it's ridiculous to think that IT is insulated from society at large. Society has these problems, so why wouldn't tech fields? I completely agree that you can't expect tech to hire more blacks than are available in the labor supply. But we're still human, still tribal, and still subject to the same social forces as the rest of society.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    116. Re:Yeah, right... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      So racism is just an issue that "blacks face"?

      Statistically, they have a much harder time of it, yes.

      Maybe you want equality under the law or maybe you want equal outcomes (typically, inequality under the law).

      I want skin color to matter exactly as much as eye color does right now.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    117. Re: Yeah, right... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I completely agree that people should not be expected to hire more people than are available in the labor pool. Any other expectation would be absurd. That said, IT is not insulated from the larger society. Larger society has systemic problems with race, and there is no reason to expect that IT would be any different.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    118. Re:Yeah, right... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      It's not that I "want" diversity. Diversity is here, and it is only getting more diverse. The problem is equality of opportunity.

      When diversity causes inequality why should we try to force equality.

      Equal opportunity does not "force" equality. If we could get to a point where people were, for some reason, actively choosing to be less educated, living in a crappy area, and making a lot less money than I'd be a happy camper.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    119. Re:Yeah, right... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      The fact that we segregate people in our minds based on skin tone and hair texture is the problem. The fact that you didn't note the applicants' eye colors but did note their "race" is the problem. I do it, too.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    120. Re:Yeah, right... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Society has these problems, so why wouldn't tech fields?

      Because tech fields are composed of different types of people who go into construction and commercial fishing. Hint: education is a big factor.

      I completely agree that you can't expect tech to hire more blacks than are available in the labor supply.

      Ok, then what exactly are you complaining about? If they can't hire more blacks than are available, then why are you complaining that they aren't hiring more blacks than are available in the labor supply?

      But we're still human, still tribal, and still subject to the same social forces as the rest of society.

      What social forces? If there's no qualified blacks to hire, then how do "social forces" have anything to do with it?

    121. Re: Yeah, right... by stdarg · · Score: 1

      Right, right, because the man taking his wife's last name is soooo common in black culture, Hispanic culture, and Asian culture. Must be because of whitey! idiot

    122. Re:Yeah, right... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Did you read the article? Blacks with still make less than whites, even in IT, even controlling for variables such as education, age, and geography.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    123. Re:Yeah, right... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Hmm, this sounds a lot like the complaint that women make less in the field. One thing about professional fields like this, though, is that negotiations are a big part of the final pay; some people are able to negotiate better salaries than others, and it's been said many times that women aren't as aggressive in salary negotiations as men. The same could be true of blacks unfortunately. Or they could be the type of people who don't change jobs much (once they get in a place, they don't want to leave because they value security higher): people like that always get terrible salaries, because the only way to get a serious raise in IT or engineering is to quit and get a new job. I wonder if any of these things are factors here. Of course, racism could certainly play a part here: if Jamal has a hard time getting an interview because of his name, once he finally finds a place that'll hire him, he may very well be inclined to take whatever their first salary offer is, and then never leave.

    124. Re:Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. The first step towards that goal is ending the victimisation and the quest to find "evidence" for racism in every possible statistic.

    125. Re: Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No joke. You Ams have it really bad.
      I was making an entry salary here and when I had to visit America for a project, my company offered to cover any risk towards my person by buying insurance and giving me a risk bonus. In the end they were using more than twice an entry American salary just to send me there.
      You get a biased view of the world because there's always people willing to sell their livers to immigrate to your country. Actually, if you took that into account, one would be better off by going to Iraq, Afghanistan or Syria.

    126. Re:Yeah, right... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Why does there have to be a single step, and in a sequence that you prescribe? Making a concerted effort to eliminate the "victim" mentality is but one piece in the puzzle.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    127. Re:Yeah, right... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      The same could be true of blacks unfortunately.

      Sure, it "could" be. I'd argue that a simpler explanation is that IT is not insulated from the ills that infect the rest of society.

      The article also goes on with other grievances, but I wanted to point to the salary gap because it is a number rather than a "feeling".

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    128. Re:Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..............let's not pretend that racism is not real and pervasive. .

      Your knee jerk .....ooooh isn't racism bad...... is pointless and is not consistent with reality.

      My experience as a manager of 100's numbers of IT is that recruiters and managers are desperate for black IT pro's to meet quotas. IBM will hire blacks even while laying off whites. There is no discrimination. On the contrary there is reverse discrimination - all things being equal they prefer to hire a black IT specialist.

      The issue is that black IT people are hard to come by.

    129. Re:Yeah, right... by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

      One of the things my mom -- hardly a racist -- noticed is that African immigrants don't have a certain attitude that some black Americans have. I'm not sure I can put it into words -- and certain not in the words she used, as I can't remember them -- but it had something to do with her being white and them being black, and things were somehow her fault, though it wasn't stated out loud. African immigrants don't have that particular unstated thing going in their heads. Nor do all black Americans.

      For what it's worth, all her ancestors were in Scandinavia until the 1870s, so any benefit she got from slavery in America was very indirect. (Any slaves held in Scandinavia were mostly likely Europeans, not Africans. And many centuries earlier.)

      She did marry a fellow who was apparently descended from one Captain Thomas Harris, who arrived in Virginia in 1611. It's entirely possible that at least some of her long-dead in-laws were slaveholders, though how much good that did a man who grew up on a dairy farm in Kansas (and more to the point, his Swedish-American wife) I can't say.

      --
      There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
    130. Re:Yeah, right... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      My wife is black, but grew up in the Caribbean. She grew up as the majority in her country and definitely lacks the hard-to-pin-down worldview that you describe. Even so, she recognizes that racism is alive and well in the US and feels that part of her professional success is due to being married to a white guy, and thus other white people feel that she is more approachable. I think she is right, sadly.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    131. Re:Yeah, right... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      The issue is that black IT people are hard to come by.

      Being employed is not the only metric here. If you read The Fine Article, it describes an uncomfortable working atmosphere and lower average salary.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    132. Re:Yeah, right... by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

      You (and she) might be selling her short. Black Americans of Caribbean ancestry tend to prosper more than black Americans whose ancestors were in the US in the 1860s. And of those black Americans, those whose ancestors were free at the time of the Civil War tend to prosper more than those who were slaves at that time.

      Racism can't explain those in-group differences -- unless you're willing to believe racists run the genealogy of the black people they encounter, and for some reason care where their ancestors were a generation or 3 or 5 or 7 ago.

      It could be she, like other black Americans of Caribbean origins, brings things to the table -- work ethic, gratification deferral, etc. -- that are causes of her professional success. Your presence as her spouse might bring a slight nudge to it, maybe, but I'd bet the bulk of it came from her personal virtues that show in her professional conduct.

      --
      There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
    133. Re:Yeah, right... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      It's a very complicated situation, with many factors. You are absolutely correct - the "immigrant mentality" is with her and her family, and they work very hard and emphasize education. It's no mistake that she and her siblings went to excellent schools and have advanced degrees. At the same time, she definitely runs into racism. And I'm more sensitive to it than I used to be - I notice it now where I didn't in the past.

      The good news in all of this is that things seem to be improving rapidly. The militantly "all white" neighborhoods are now integrating. Affluent people are moving into what used to be a war zone (gentrification). You see mixed-race groups of friends much more commonly than in the past. Millennials seem a lot less hung up on race. It's hard to believe that my wife was born a year after interracial marriage became legal in the entire US. There's still a lot to do, but wow. We even have a half-black, half-white President - same as my kids.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    134. Re:Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someday you will not be a racist.
      Get over it, already.
      Racists don't get to have slaves anymore unless they are corporate.
      They get to make rude comments anonymously on internet chat boards.
      Of course, there are black racists as well, which excuses your ignorant response not at all.

  2. Bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Black males are 5.5% of all college students in the US. From those graduating, 2% going to tech doesn't sound that bad, statistically.

    1. Re:Bah by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Precisely. They're not under represented once you filter for skills.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    2. Re:Bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Black males are 5.5% of all college students in the US. From those graduating, 2% going to tech doesn't sound that bad, statistically.

      And for an industry that can easily employ someone who reads a few technical books and takes a certification test or two, I find the argument that continues to bring college into the mix as inaccurate and rather pointless.

      Perhaps this would be more relevant if we were discussing medical doctorate positions, but in all honesty, some of the best IT "gurus" in the world don't have an expensive piece of paper hanging on the wall.

      It's also part of the reason they're considered gurus.

    3. Re:Bah by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      Not sure why college is relevant. Quite a few of my peers here haven't gone to college and are in IT. Maybe a specialized branch requires college? On my team, half have college, half don't.

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    4. Re:Bah by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      Certifications aren't required either... you could have started as a tech grub for an ISP or computer manufacture and worked your way up with only on the job training.

      At no point have I ever had anyone say to me "Isn't your degree in applied arts? How can you know that without a CS degree?"

      The company I work for employs fewer people with degrees than people with extensive experience.

    5. Re:Bah by Aryden · · Score: 1

      This is a misnomer, in today's markets, it is getting increasingly difficult to land jobs without a college degree. I am highly qualified in my field, I have certifications out the ying yang and I still have trouble landing some contracts purely due to not yet having finished my degree and I've been in the field 15 years.

    6. Re:Bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure why college is relevant. Quite a few of my peers here haven't gone to college and are in IT. Maybe a specialized branch requires college? On my team, half have college, half don't.

      [John]

      10 years ago it didn't matter during the tech bubble. Those who made it in (like me) have experience behind our backs. People new to the industry however need college and sometimes on hands experience due to the market being so tight on jobs.

    7. Re: Bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finish it and reap the rewards. Dipshit.

    8. Re:Bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or "African" for that matter.

      (Note: I know several Africans, and no, not all of them are black -- i.e. the color of your skin doesn't make you "African", being from Africa makes you "African")

    9. Re:Bah by Cramer · · Score: 1

      some of the best IT "gurus" in the world don't have an expensive piece of paper hanging on the wall.

      Sure they do, it has a Cisco logo on it. :-)

      (I have two college degrees. They aren't hanging on any wall, 'tho -- they're in a file cabinet.)

    10. Re:Bah by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      This is a misnomer, in today's markets, it is getting increasingly difficult to land jobs without a college degree

      It depends on who is doing the hiring. It IT is directly hiring, they tend not to worry much about the degree and look at work experience, self-study, etc, especially because so little of a CS degree is applicable to IT.

      However, if HR is screening, they'll often use a degree as a quick and easy way of whittling down lists of qualified candidates.

    11. Re:Bah by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

      Wait, is the market tight on jobs or is there not enough candidates? Seems like every other week I hear something different!

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    12. Re:Bah by Aryden · · Score: 1

      And that's the problem. I have been dealing with large organizations for years. I have even been the one to build requirements for a position and submit them to HR for posting. HR will then take those req's, jargon them up so that half the time they don't make sense and then add in their own requirements such as Bachelor's degree in computer science or related field and 10 years experience in X random tech that has nothing to do with the job. I've cursed out HR reps for doing shit like this because they want too much for even entry level positions @ $30k/year. Hell, my 12 year old daughter can do better web design and development than some of the cats coming out of school with "I know Dreamweaver" degrees.

  3. Something they should focus on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:U.S._incarceration_rate_by_race_2.gif

    And maybe their diversity in tech would improve.

    Since when did RACE only mean black... That's weird.
    Oh shit i said black. Downmod me. I'm racist!

    1. Re:Something they should focus on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do seem really racist. You do know that the high incarceration rate of African-Americans is due to racism, right? They get put away for victimless "crimes" that white people get a slap on the wrist for.

    2. Re:Something they should focus on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do seem really racist. You do know that the high incarceration rate of African-Americans is due to racism, right? They get put away for victimless "crimes" that white people get a slap on the wrist for.

      Maybe I'm just missing something, but I can't tell from the GP's post that he/she wasn't saying precisely what you're saying. As a society we fuck over a lot of black males by giving them records for stupid shit while they're young, this puts them at a severe disadvantage going forward and only the rare individual manages to completely overcome it.

      The GP could have meant something racist, but I think it's unfair to assume that, their post doesn't posit a reason for the high incarceration rate, just mentions that it's a problem, and, as we both agree, it is.

    3. Re:Something they should focus on... by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      there's no such thing as a victimless crime.

      Read the citations. Just the first line. A lot of them say "STATE VERSUS..."

      The STATE makes the claim. The STATE is the victim.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    4. Re:Something they should focus on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      7% of the black population are arrested for crimes (which include violent ones), while only 3% of the white population are arrested.

    5. Re:Something they should focus on... by Wootery · · Score: 0

      The state may claim that it's somehow a "victim" of you smoking pot. That doesn't stop it being a victimless crime.

    6. Re:Something they should focus on... by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      The people (or more accurately their representatives) made those laws. We can argue all day about the rational for any of them, but it's their choice as to what they want to permit or not in their state. Some would argue that legalized pot, or prostitution is victimless. Others would can counter, and claim both are not...society being the victim, or the young ladies. It mostly depends upon which side of the issue you stand.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    7. Re:Something they should focus on... by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 5, Interesting

      there's no such thing as a victimless crime.

      That's true. But not the GP called it "crime", as in, they are put away for non-crimes (i.e., they were incarcerated despite the lack of an identifiable victim.

      The STATE is the victim.

      No. The "state" cannot be a victim, it owns a monopoly on "legal" violence, and exists only to protect the rights of its citizens. If the State can claim to be a victim and kill and incarcerate citizens because to protect itself from its people, then it has become a tyranny and should be dismantled. The state should rightly fear its people, not the other way around.

      And since you seem to be implying that possession and/or distribution of some state-declared contraband (an act the state punishes blacks for very disproportionally than whites), I'll leave this quote from Lysander Spooner right here for you to ponder:

      Vices are those acts by which a man harms himself or his property. Crimes are those acts by which one man harms the person or property of another. Vices are simply the errors which a man makes in his search after his own happiness. Unlike crimes, they imply no malice toward others, and no interference with their persons or property. In vices, the very essence of crime - that is, the design to injure the person or property of another - is wanting. It is a maxim of the law that there can be no crime without criminal intent; that is, without the intent to invade the person or property of another. But no one ever practices a vice with any such criminal intent. He practices his vice for his own happiness solely, and not from any malice toward others. Unless this clear distinction between vices and crimes be made and recognized by the laws, there can be on earth no such thing as individual right, liberty, or property, and the corresponding coequal rights of another man to the control of his own person and property.

      For a government to declare a vice to be a crime, and to punish it as such, is an attempt to falsify the very nature of things. It is as absurd as it would be to declare truth to be a falsehood, or falsehood a truth.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    8. Re:Something they should focus on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      7% of the black population are arrested for crimes (which include violent ones), while only 3% of the white population are arrested.

      I know you're smart enough to understand that these numbers mean nothing at all unless you make the completely unwarranted assumption that the probability of a black committing a crime is identical to the probability of a white committing a crime.

      According to the FBI, 53% of the murders committed in the U.S. in which the race of the perp is known are committed by blacks. Blacks represent 13% of the population. Criminality is rampant in the permanent black urban underclass. That's where the arrest disparity comes from, not some imaginary "racism".

    9. Re:Something they should focus on... by NotSanguine · · Score: 1

      Maybe not so much. From the link:

      3. The New York Police Department city made more stops of young black men in 2011 than there are young black men in the city, as part of its aggressive stop-and-frisk program that a federal judge deemed racial profiling earlier this month. In the years since, the NYPD has decreased the number of stops, but the disproportionate impact on blacks and Hispanics remains dramatic. A chart from the New York Public Advocate illustrates the disparity: National studies have found that blacks and Hispanics are approximately three times more likely to be searched during a traffic stop than white motorists. African Americans are twice as likely to be arrested and almost four times as likely to experience the use of force during encounters with the police.

      [emphasis added]

      --
      No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
    10. Re:Something they should focus on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We can argue all day about the rational for any of them, but it's their choice as to what they want to permit or not in their state."

      Well no, it isnt.

    11. Re:Something they should focus on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's sure a high number of African-Americans in professional sports.

      That's racist. I wanna bounce a ball and get paid millions too.

    12. Re:Something they should focus on... by HBI · · Score: 1

      A rehash of this, iow

      You can't get governments to stop doing this shit, though. All you can do is minimize the size of government - starve the beast - so it can't do more of this crap. The group mind is a feeble thing and easily swayed emotionally.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    13. Re:Something they should focus on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      7% of the black population are arrested for crimes (which include violent ones), while only 3% of the white population are arrested.

      Are you implying that white people are committing just as many crimes as black people, but not being arrested for it? Where is this data coming from - personal anecdotes?

    14. Re:Something they should focus on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this country, the govt represents the people. A crime against the state is a crime against society.

    15. Re:Something they should focus on... by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      Is this country, the govt represents the people. A crime against the state is a crime against society.

      You mean like the crime of "driving while black"?

      Since I've already quoted Spooner, I might as well go ahead and pull out a choice quote from Thomas Paine's "Common Sense" as a response to this inane comment:

      "SOME writers have so confounded society with government, as to leave little or no distinction between them; whereas they are not only different, but have different origins. Society is produced by our wants, and government by our wickedness; the former promotes our happiness POSITIVELY by uniting our affections, the latter NEGATIVELY by restraining our vices. ... Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one: for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries BY A GOVERNMENT, which we might expect in a country WITHOUT GOVERNMENT, our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer."

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    16. Re:Something they should focus on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously? It was just pointed out the statistics say black men are committing more murders and you point out that more are being stopped and searched. If the first is true then the second easily follows if you're an officer who has experienced this first-hand. I hate the cops as much as the next guy and the stop and frisk thing pisses me off too but come-on if you've got experience and statistics that say that one thing then duh policies like that are going to lead to more scrutiny of particular races. Fair? No not if you think profiling is an issue. If you believe that profiling has merit than it's no surprise at all....

    17. Re:Something they should focus on... by Wootery · · Score: 1

      It mostly depends upon which side of the issue you stand.

      This is of course true for any particular example (gun ownership being a similar matter in the eyes on many liberals), but my point was that there's no such thing as a victimless crime is categorically false, as it's essentially saying there's no such thing as a bullshit law.

    18. Re:Something they should focus on... by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Okay well we'll continue to disagree. I see it like the ihtoit stated. If the people's representatives made those laws, then violations of them are arguably offenses against the people. It's probably a bit pedantic though, and I certainly don't disagree that some laws are bullshit. But then those who wrote them will disagree with us, and we've come full circle. I'm gonna go have a couple beers and philosophize about it some more :-P

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  4. biased claims by ihtoit · · Score: 0, Troll

    what's the proportion of blacks against whites who graduate from high school again?

    Start there.

    And fuck off with your "Me now!" wont of entitlement.

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    1. Re:biased claims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless your a 1%er you should be afraid. America is changing and the white entitlement is loosing ground. Too bad you do not see the pattern...Housing market it wasn't an issue till it happened to whites..Loosing rights it also want a problem till it happened to whites..HB1's, outsourcing etc now its a problem for whites...pay attention but your since of entitlement doesn't allow you

    2. Re:biased claims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm going to hazard the proportion is smaller. Then I'm going to hazard the proportion going into stem is smaller and then I'm going also assume the proportion getting hired into IT jobs is even smaller.

      Why would you put the effort into playing a game that's rigged against you? I really think you're thinking about the issue backwards.

    3. Re:biased claims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why would you put the effort into playing a game that's rigged against you?

      Dude, that's just a load of manure. And you know it. In all tech places I've seen so far, they were looking for competent professionals to do some specific jobs. If an applicant can cut it, no one cares if he/she/it is a friggin' martian. Let alone something as mundane and normal as an African American.

      Seriously. For real tech jobs, no one cares. Be a competent coder/engineer/systems designer/whatever, and you are in.

      Now management and such, I am afraid you have a point of sorts. At least in some places. But hardcore tech, the sort where you need real engineers (and not coding monkeys): nope, sorry. There are far too few good players around for the really difficult jobs, for anyone being able to have a racial preference.

    4. Re:biased claims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I Graduated HS in class of 200 - 95% black, 3% white, 2% other in rural America.

      How many went to college from that class? 4 total, 3 whites, 1 black (on a full ride athletic scholarship)

      How many graduated? Two that I know of, I'm half. I got an Engineering Degree. The guy with the scholarship flunked out of NCAA eligibility in his 2nd year and one of the other two got an education degree. I hope more have graduated since, but I moved out of state so I don't know.

      Who do they remember from my class at that school? The kid that flunked out of a full athletic scholarship.

      It's not that this school was full of stupid people, it wasn't. None when to college because they didn't want too leave, or didn't want to be seen as a traitor to their race and get shunned by their friends. Many got stuck in the cycle of dependance. "I cannot wait to turn 18 so I can move out and start getting my own welfare checks!" was a commonly heard sentiment in the hallways. It still makes me sad to think many of my friends didn't even try.

      This is a cultural issue not an opportunity issue. It is also a perception issue where we somehow think Outcome=Opportunity, regardless of the effort put in. This is an issue of dependance on welfare. Yet many of these people would be more than willing to look at me, a middle aged, middle class, white man as the problem. They think I am why they never succeed, but it's really because they never tried.

      This is not to say racism is not a factor in some cases, I'm just saying it is not THE factor in why the statistical numbers looked skewed. We need to be totally honest with ourselves before we start suggesting solutions to this, or we will NOT fix anything, only make things worse.

    5. Re:biased claims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

        Be BLACK competent coder/engineer/systems designer/whatever, and you are REALLY IN.
      FTFY.

    6. Re:biased claims by digsbo · · Score: 1

      Dude, I know you were trying to make a point here, but fucking seriously. The example of grammar here seriously questions your initial claim.

      Not really. A lot of the posters on /. have terrible spelling and grammar.

    7. Re:biased claims by the_skywise · · Score: 1

      That looks more like a missed autocorrect via a smartphone post.

    8. Re:biased claims by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      I end up having effectively poor spelling or grammar in a lot of my posts. The truth is that in person, when speaking, I have very good grammar, and my spelling ability is at least average. When writing posts, however, I tend to go back and edit them heavily, and somehow I end up missing that I've left old words in sections I meant to delete, etc. I suspect it's due to my ADD problems, diagnosed only as an adult.

      Anyway, my point is that someone having poor grammar in posts doesn't necessarily say much about his grammar in other contexts.

    9. Re:biased claims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...It's not that this school was full of stupid people, it wasn't. None when to college because they didn't want too leave...

      Dude, I know you were trying to make a point here, but fucking seriously. The example of grammar here seriously questions your initial claim.

      I am very sorry for the mistakes, but you did get my point. My spelling is horrid sometimes and I have a very bad habit of reading what I expect to see and not what's really there (Something I remember my kindergarten teacher trying to break me of.) This makes it really hard to see grammatical mistakes, especially in things I have written and heavily edited because what I want to say is running though my short term memory. The solution I use in my professional life two fold. One: I will review my draft multiple times and always try to do so on different days. This provides enough time to make sure my short term memory doesn't contain my intended wording, forcing me to actually read what is there. Second: I have other people red-line multiple drafts for grammatical mistakes before I release them.

      None of this is possible for SlashDot posts or E-Mail, so I slog though the best I can.

    10. Re:biased claims by s.petry · · Score: 1

      Glad I'm not the only one that does this on occasion. The unfortunate nature of Slashdot is that it is perceived that one needs to post quickly to be seen.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    11. Re:biased claims by nine-times · · Score: 1

      It is also a perception issue where we somehow think Outcome=Opportunity... They think I am why they never succeed, but it's really because they never tried.

      Even if we accept this, it only raises the question, why doesn't outcome work out to be, over the long run, analogous to opportunity? I'm not asking, "why doesn't every single kid succeed equally," but if you have a bunch of kids and we suppose all of them have the same opportunities, why don't we an average success rate among different groups? Or even if we accept your analysis, that they "never tried", then why aren't they trying?

      I feel a twinge of something in your explanation, which is a sort of understanding of the world that I hear people express often. It assumes a just world, that people who don't succeed are either inherently inferior, or not trying. Further, it offers no explanation as to why people wouldn't try, other than something like, "They're just not the sort of people who work hard," again implying idea that lack of economic success is simply a function of being inherently inferior. The explanation treats it as though it's simply a function of laziness and stupidity, neither of which have explanations, neither of which can be helped.

      But it doesn't jibe with any of my experience of how people work. People are "lazy" when they're asked to do things that they don't see as benefiting them, or they're put into circumstance where they don't anticipate success. Contrary to the narrative we hear in some pockets of the media, it's not tons of fun being poor and on welfare. I doubt the kids you grew up with were intentionally choosing that because the perceived a bright future for themselves, but thought welfare would be more fun.

      So all of this just raises the question, what's really going on here? Why are these kids feeling demotivated and disinterested in improving their own lives? Whether or not there had been a lot of opportunity for those kids, I suspect they didn't believe that there was. I would suspect that they had received a lot of messages in their lives, from whatever, sources, saying that college was not for them, not something they could do, not something that they would be successful at, and not something that would provide them with a better future. And whether the sources of those messages were from white people or black people, the messages themselves are bound up in a whole culture of racism.

    12. Re:biased claims by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      I feel a twinge of something in your explanation, which is a sort of understanding of the world that I hear people express often. It assumes a just world, that people who don't succeed are either inherently inferior, or not trying.

      You might already know this and just not be mentioning the name, but that is called the just-world hypothesis.

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    13. Re:biased claims by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      Sounds to me, that is very much is a discrimination situation. The government is aggressively and systematically enforcing a system of apartheid against these Black Americans with their system of welfare. They do the same thing over here in Canada with the Native Americans. It is a very effective system.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    14. Re:biased claims by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      No, it's not apartheid. Welfare goes to everybody who applies and is deemed qualifying. That it is given disproportionally by race says nothing about the welfare system and a lot about other things that go on.

      There are discriminatory government programs, most obviously in law enforcement, but welfare isn't one of them.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    15. Re:biased claims by wisnoskij · · Score: 1
      It might not be a perfectly efficient practice that catches all blacks and hurts 0 whites but, it does effect a huge portion of the black community. And like the original comment said, the system is designed in such a way that getting out of the system is almost impossible, instead the natural effect is to sink lower into it.
      So the rest of the details are unimportant. About a third of the black community is imprisoned in this system of repression.

      Welfare goes to everybody who applies and is deemed qualifying.

      Oh, so just like Indentured Slavery then?

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    16. Re:biased claims by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Last I looked, the average stay on a welfare program was about three years. This suggests to me that getting out of the system is quite possible, and from what little I've seen welfare programs will try to encourage the recipient to become independent. The real killer tends to be medical care. A welfare mother who has a kid with an existing medical problem is going to be in a really bad position if she makes enough to get off Medicaid. She's very unlikely to go immediately into a group insurance program that doesn't care about pre-existing conditions.

      It's likely that some people milk the welfare system for decades, but for every one who does that there have to be many that are on it for a year or two, and then get out.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    17. Re:biased claims by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      Yes, but many come back in short order. And the question is not whether it is possible to use welfare for a short period and get off of it permanently, or even if the majority use it like this, but whether a significant number of people are held back because of it. +50% of the black community could still be stuck in a cycle of poverty fuelled by the welfare system, while the majority of welfare users were not, if welfare is used by a large enough portion of the total population.

      And just because people get off of it, does not mean they are not stuck in a cycle of going back to welfare every few years, rinse repeat.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    18. Re:biased claims by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      In other words, it's like apartheid because you make up possibilities? Do you have any actual evidence for your opinion?

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  5. It's a product of the environment by Thanshin · · Score: 1

    Basements whiten people.

    In 2018 the explosion of the Yellowstone caldera will block the sun for years, killing everything that needs the sun to survive.

    Leaving behind only IT professionals.

    Thus, Morlocks.

    Mr. Wells did build the friggin machine.

    1. Re:It's a product of the environment by ArcadeMan · · Score: 2

      Why would we need Sun to survive? Nobody uses Java applets anymore!

      Oh wait. I'm a Morlock.

  6. City life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How about the fact that in urban America, there is an overwhelming mentality of selling out your black-ness if you do "smart white people" stuff... like going to college, studying, getting jobs where you wear suits, etc. Our kids are getting ostracized for not being black enough when they get good grades or have good behavior or dress well. Come on!

    I applaud the young black people who make it through that and become successful professionals.

    1. Re:City life by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      White kids get the same thing. Anyone who cares about studying is branded a nerd, regardless of race.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:City life by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Anyone who cares about studying is branded a nerd, regardless of race.

      But there is a difference.
      A black nerd is an outcast.
      A white nerd hangs out with the other white nerds.
      An Asian nerd is part of the in-crowd.

    3. Re:City life by nine-times · · Score: 1

      I don't actually know what the numbers are, but I suspect that not all black people are "urban". Also-- again, I'm not really an expert-- but I suspect part of the aversion to doing "white people stuff" (where that aversion exists) is the result of disbelief at the prospect of actually becoming accepted among white people. In other words, the reason some black people might discourage education (and be discouraged from trying to become educated) is that they don't really expect that they can enter into the world of "white America" and be successful and accepted.

      It's like, Imagine someone told you, "All the billionaires in the world wear these funny clothes, speak in this particular dialect (a dialect which sounds really lame), and memorize obscure 18th-century poetry. If you make a jackass out of yourself trying to do these things, you'll be just like the billionaires, and then they'll make you a billionaire too!" You'd think that sounded like some silly nonsense, and you wouldn't bother trying to do it.

      It seems like a difficult problem to me.

    4. Re:City life by twistedcubic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I am so tired of this simple-minded shit getting modded +5 Insightful. Please stop psychoanalyzing an entire race if your primary experience with members of that race are just one real-life person (who will never get invited to your home), and a bunch of fools on television. You don't know what the hell you're talking about. You're not that amazing. Get over it.

    5. Re:City life by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Are you saying non-black kids are racists who don't let black kids join their nerd cliques? Or that races naturally segregate? Seriously, I'm trying to understand what you mean.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:City life by Ayanami_R · · Score: 2

      So effin true. I still have some physical (!) scars from being the kid who was "acting white" growing up. If it weren't for my family I would have probably killed myself, seriously, it was that bad. My son is going through a few of the same things, but he's more headstrong than I was, so he is handling it much better than I did.

      --
      "Science is the power of man"
    7. Re:City life by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      a black nerd is an outcast in a black majority school.
      at a more racially diverse school, they are just a nerd.

    8. Re:City life by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      My experience of this is purely cultural. Growing up, the poorer, working class white kids (in an almost 100% white society) largely eschewed the possibility of academic achievement and consequent self betterment. Even some of the smart ones would deliberately do poorly in tests so that they could stay with their friends in the dumbo class the following year, or go to the technical school to learn a trade. Nothing wrong with working in a trade, but even at age 12 it appalled me that they would limit themselves to this narrow path. But having said this, I might be much better off now if I had learned in school how to be a plumber, fitter, electrician.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    9. Re:City life by JerryLove · · Score: 1

      So what about those "fools on television" who are of said race? Do they not know what they hell they are talking about?
      http://www.blackyouthproject.c...

    10. Re:City life by guruevi · · Score: 2

      In the black community it is the ADULTS (parents, family etc) making these (ignorant) comments. It's not another kid calling them a geek or a nerd, it's their support network at home, in their communities, their parents, their grandparents, aunts and uncles, their pastors etc.

      Even though your hick dad may give you a hard time once in a while for doing such a sissy job, most white parents (even ignorant ones) are glad and make a big deal of it with their drinking buddies when their kids get a better education or job than they themselves do. Black parents are frequently ashamed and ostracized for 'letting their kids act white' instead of contributing the money and time spent within their own (local) community (aka doing drugs and running shady businesses).

      Disclaimer: I am the parent of a mixed (African-American and European) child and this is how the black side of the family and a large portion of the black community involved react to wanting a good education or a good job for the child.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    11. Re:City life by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Are you saying non-black kids are racists who don't let black kids join their nerd cliques?

      Most black students attend black majority schools. So "hanging out with the white kids" is still being an outcast. A black nerd is not going to get a date to the prom.

      Or that races naturally segregate?

      Of course they do. Visit any high school lunchroom. Same tables will be mixed, but many will not be. Residential segregation is even worse than educational segregation. A black nerd may have nerd friends at school, but none in his neighborhood.

    12. Re:City life by gtall · · Score: 1

      "part of the aversion to doing "white people stuff" (where that aversion exists) is the result of disbelief at the prospect of actually becoming accepted among white people"

      While that may be part of it, another part is that doing "white people stuff" means you are not doing black people stuff and hence are not black enough. I tend to think it has a heavy does of socio-economic bias built into it. If you are brought up in a poverty stricken area with a majority race, that race and poverty are seen as part of the same thing. So doing anything outside of the run of the mill things for that area will brand you as "other". In black inner cities, you are acting white. In white Appalachia, you are branded effete or thinking you are better than your peers. It is the same thing, but it gets colored differently depending upon where you are.

    13. Re:City life by nine-times · · Score: 1

      While that may be part of it, another part is that doing "white people stuff" means you are not doing black people stuff and hence are not black enough...

      Yeah, but that's kind of an empty explanation. I think it only raises the question, how is the decision made about which behavior is "not black enough" and why do people care? I suspect that there's an understanding bundled into the whole thing that "You're trying to emulate a group that will not truly accept you and that you can never really become a part of, and whenever someone from our group tries to emulate that group anyway, it's just another humiliation for our group."

      I can't claim to really know, but it seems to me that there's something like that going on. I think that if more black people perceived a way to engage in "white people stuff" on their own terms, without sacrificing their identity or humiliating themselves, the aversion would be diminished.

    14. Re:City life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I double dog dare you to call Lord Nikon a nerd.

    15. Re:City life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've got some unique insight, care to share more? Not being snarky but you might be able to help others understand. I'm far enough out of school that I didn't see too much of this but I saw enough even that long ago. I see my fair share of white trash too who don't seem to want to get off their asses but not many who try to actually stop them if they try! I don't understand family dragging someone down who tries to achieve...

      I see a few black project managers where I'm at including one who's also a woman, there's also a really well dressed requirements type guy who just doesn't seem to get it but since most of the others he works with are the same I think it's just the HR fools to blame. I see many races where I work but truly not many seem to be black or I've just not noticed. I cannot recall interviewing anyone who was black for a position but so long as they had the skills I'd give them a thumbs up.

      Heh, just realized, the boss a level or two above me is also a black woman and we've got a black woman leading another team. One of them is pretty darned good, the other seems awful angry. Crap, just realized there's a woman ON my team who's black as well - sits a few desks away. I suppose there's more people of color working with me than I realized. The female teammate I work with is PC as all hell which is annoying but she's good at what she does.

      Screw it, I'll post this one anon but I am interested in anything you might have to say about this

    16. Re:City life by ChoosyBeggar · · Score: 1

      A black nerd may well be an outcast in mainstream black culture, but not in the collective "nerd-culture". What nerds care about is technical expertise. Skills trump skin color.

    17. Re:City life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A black nerd is not going to get a date to the prom.

      Meanwhile, white nerds are banging the whole cheerleader squad. /s Give me a break.

    18. Re:City life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UMMMM where I come from all the "nerds" hung out together regardless of race.
      So, what are you saying?

      This entire discussion will be pointless because there is almost no way to talk about this subject without making sweeping generalizations.

      Each individual has their own experience, and can make their own decisions how to react and move on.
      Trust me, as a white person, it sure doesn't feel like I'm given any type of special preference.
      In fact, when I get a speeding ticket, I am 100% SURE that if I was black, I would have gotten a warning.
      We all feel that way. Get over it and move on with your life - it's actually ALL you CAN do.

    19. Re:City life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Had a team meeting today and realized there was yet another black woman on the team I'd forgotten about. Weirdly all of the folks I work with directly who are black are all women. All of them are techies from higher level managers down to software testers. Don't think there was any specific plan for that but when someone who is qualified comes calling and we need them we hire

  7. NdGT by rodrigoandrade · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What does Neil deGrasse Tyson have to say about racial diversity in astrophysics?

    That's right, nothing, so who fucking cares??

    1. Re:NdGT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a quick guess, but according to the article those few black IT workers who make "on average, $3,656 less than white workers." ( which accounts for such variables as education, age, and geography) may be among the ones who fucking care.

    2. Re:NdGT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wrong.

      http://youtube.com/watch?v=z7ihNLEDiuM

      He has some very pointed things to say about diversity in the sciences, both racial and by gender.

    3. Re:NdGT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > What does Neil deGrasse Tyson have to say about racial diversity in astrophysics?

      "if you’re the first to go to college or the first to go to a selective school where there’s a high expectation of opportunity, is the first thing you’re thinking of, “Oh, let me study science?” No, you’re going to sort of build capital. You’re going to choose a job where income is guaranteed and high. So, the legal, the finance, the business school, the law school, medical school."
      -- Noted astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson discusses lack of minority representation in his field

      In other words astrophysics is the kind of job normal people look at, not people coming from desperate means.

      > That's right, nothing, so who fucking cares??

      Typical racist response. Your ignorance proves nothing except your ignorance.

    4. Re:NdGT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get that $3,656 is a notable amount, but in IT that can simply be the difference between one paygrade and the next, and the article doesn't mention if that was taken into account. They might have done so with 'Age' but age doesn't mean a whole lot in IT. Since black Americans are newer to IT, we could expect more of them in the lower pay grades, so the high-end pay grades that are predominantly white will skew the data, giving the result of $3,656.

      Also, there's a cultural question: are black IT professionals less likely to negotiate or do they negotiate less aggressively than their white counterparts? I don't know. The article doesn't say either. But if the answers are yes, then it wouldn't be surprising to see them make less. Given two equal candidates(on their resumes): one is black, one is white. They both go through the interview process and are evaluated to be equal. They are both offered $48,000 for the position. The white guy comes back and says "Well, I think I'm worth $51,000. That's not just a number I'm pulling out of my ass, I think I deserve that salary because of {qualification x}, {qualification y}, {qualification z}" And the hiring manager thinks to himself "Well, I can have cheaper labor, or I can have slightly more expensive labor that's much more skilled". The choice isn't so clear - many people think companies always choose the cheapest option but that's just not the case. If they hire both candidates, then the white guy is instantly making more than the black guy, but they were both offered the same salary for the same position. If this is an entry-level position and these two follow the exact same path through their careers, the gap will only grow even if everything is exactly equal. Things like "who is more likely to negotiate", "who is more aggressive at negotiating" are important pieces of information.

      I'm not saying that blacks aren't disadvantaged. They probably are. But looking at a $3,656 disparity isn't so simple. In my industry, all salaries are extremely regulated, but examples like the above all the time. A position might have a minimum salary of $xx,xxx, but there will be people who come along and ask for more money(and get it). I've seen studies suggest that men are more likely to negotiate than women, but I haven't seen the same for races. And if that's the piece of information that explains the disparity, there's not a damn thing companies can do about it. They're not going get the white guy asking for $51,000, turn around, and tell the black guy "Hey, we're hiring this other guy for the same position for $51,000. Would you like more money too?"

    5. Re:NdGT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's a hypocrite.

      I'm sure he'd have that gig on PBS if he were white [sarcasm]

    6. Re:NdGT by xaotikdesigns · · Score: 1

      Not only paygrades, but also certifications. That bump in salary could be the difference between having a certification or two, and not having them.

      --
      XDInd
    7. Re:NdGT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Not only paygrades, but also certifications. That bump in salary could be the difference between having a certification or two, and not having them

      All of which is profoundly retarded when you are talking about an entire group that is only defined by their skin color. And this whole thing about black people culturally don't negotiate - completely pulled out of the AC's ass - is just victim blaming.

    8. Re:NdGT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Luke: (to NdGT) He told me you killed him.

      Neil deGrasse Tyson: No, White student, I am your father.

    9. Re:NdGT by oldmac31310 · · Score: 0

      Does not seem to me to be a particularly intelligent fellow any time I've seen him interviewed or interviewing other people. Am I missing something?

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    10. Re:NdGT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Neither does "Bubba" Clinton.

      Nevertheless, he is most likely the smartest man to have ever occupied (and stained) the Oval Orifice.

      People (especially this crowd) conflate erudition with intelligence.

      Oops.

    11. Re:NdGT by NotSanguine · · Score: 2

      What does Neil deGrasse Tyson have to say about racial diversity in astrophysics? That's right, nothing, so who fucking cares??

      As a young child, I lived in the same housing complex where NdGT grew up, and two of my brothers went to the same high school as he did (one of them contemporaneously). NdGT grew up middle/upper-middle class, which is a much greater indicator of education/tech success than race, IMHO. I can tell you from personal experience that neither of those places were hotbeds of crime or "thug culture." In fact, they were, for the most part, quite nice. What is more, that high school has produced at least eight Nobel Prize winners and at least seven Pulitzer Prize winners.

      That's not to say that he didn't have cultural barriers to overcome, but I think (and several other people have intimated here) that socio-economic status plays a big role in this issue. At the same time, it should be pretty obvious to anyone who hasn't had their head shoved up their ass their whole lives, that bigotry (I won't call it racism, since there is only one sentient race on this planet) is an issue as well.

      --
      No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
    12. Re:NdGT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    13. Re:NdGT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would submit that Thomas Jefferson was the smartest President, not Bill Clinton.

  8. Populations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read the Bell Curve.

    Individuals are individuals but populations have statistics.

  9. Another Factor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm over 65, but over these many years I encountered many Blacks who had been siphoned off into management. STEM folks have rigor and perseverance, so this is a natural source for people with proven talents and capabilities. It IS a pipeline issue.

    1. Re:Another Factor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      STEM folks are being implanted into the work force. What will the results be? Will it cure bigotry and other sexual disfunctions? Will it replace my retinas?

  10. I'm black and in tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It has everything to do with brothers not getting into STEM fields. The few of us that are here get jobs pretty easily, actually. Companies want to be diverse, they just don't have the applicants for it.

    1. Re: I'm black and in tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1000

    2. Re:I'm black and in tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm relieved to hear that. Er, I mean the part about it not being the tech industry itself posing a problem.

    3. Re: I'm black and in tech by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      Pointless comment, not over 9000.

    4. Re:I'm black and in tech by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

      I agree whole heartily. As a white guy in IT with a BS in Comp Sci. Here's what I've seen.
      1. In a class of ~500 CS majors, we had maybe 10 black students. Of that number, I *think* only 2 or 3 graduated?
      2. In my ~15 year career as a devops IT guy I've worked with exactly two black co-workers who've been in the same org-chart as me.

      Why is it that other racial/ethnic groups aren't attracted to STEM? Unfortunately, I don't a good answer.

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    5. Re:I'm black and in tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has everything to do with brothers not getting into STEM fields. The few of us that are here get jobs pretty easily, actually. Companies want to be diverse, they just don't have the applicants for it.

      So it's basically the same issue as with women in tech? (I'm not trying to be offensive)

    6. Re:I'm black and in tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Posting AC as to preserve mod points.

      Other racial and ethnic groups are attracted to STEM: Asians and Indians in particular. People here do realize that there is more than "black" and "white," yes?

      The problem here is that people are attributing this to skin color. Skin color has nothing to do with it. What DOES has to do with it is culture. If you live in a culture where you're expected to fail because someone else is "keeping you down," then guess what? You are going to fail. If you are expected to succeed, or at least try your hardest to succeed no matter the opposition you face, then guess what? You are going to be successful.

      This is not a skin color issue, and I am sick of it being painted that way. How many white people born in a low class trailer park end up in a field requiring higher education? How many Japanese kids from an educated family that expect their child to pull their own weight from an early age end up in a field requiring higher education?

      It isn't the skin color guys. Can we please, please, please stop falling into this ridiculous trap?

      As an aside, I see a lot of Caucasian dudes in IT, sure, but "white" isn't a race any more than "black" or "brown" is. There's a lot of variety of cultural heritage when it comes to "white" folks. Italians. Scandinavians. Greeks. Icelanders. Canadians. French.

    7. Re:I'm black and in tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 fer shizzle

    8. Re:I'm black and in tech by chihowa · · Score: 1

      As an aside, I see a lot of Caucasian dudes in IT, sure, but "white" isn't a race any more than "black" or "brown" is. There's a lot of variety of cultural heritage when it comes to "white" folks. Italians. Scandinavians. Greeks. Icelanders. Canadians. French.

      White is a more valid descriptor than Caucasian since most "white people" aren't from the Caucasus region. It's fascinating (in a disgusting sort of way) that people have latched onto that term to describe white people. The term "Caucasian" itself is pretty heinous, being coined by Christoph Meiners as part of his theory of polygenism, where he described black people as basically being subhuman animals.

      I think "white", "black", "red" or whatever is the least racist form of descriptor since it makes no assumptions of identity, culture, or heritage. The color of our skin is certainly useful as a means of physically describing someone: the tall black man or the brown-haired white woman. Anything more than that presumes to make important inferences about a person based on the color of their skin (read: prejudice).

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    9. Re:I'm black and in tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People point out an observation: "You don't see many black people in IT"
      Your response: "This is not a skin color issue."

      See the problem? No? Ok. The observation here is that there are far fewer people with black skin who work in IT than you would expect. See we all know that the word 'race' doesn't mean much and that there are Indians and Chinese and Hispanics and White people and (almost) everything else in IT. What is weird and out of the ordinary is that there are almost no black people in IT.

      It is a skin color issue, by fucking definition. That's what we're talking about here. Skin color. The color of one's skin and how that relates to them working in IT (or not working in IT as is probably the case if their skin is black.)

      Get it yet? No? Ok I give up.

    10. Re:I'm black and in tech by zwarte+piet · · Score: 1

      Are less black people interested in IT jobs?

    11. Re:I'm black and in tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm glad that you give up. Should we also be upset that there is an over-representation of people of Asian and Indian descent in the IT industry?

      It is not a skin color issue - to show that it is a skin color issue you need to prove that:

      A) Education opportunities are tied to skin color.
      B) The ability to lean is tied to skin color.
      C) Hiring is tied to skin color.

      A is objectively false. People who happen to have dark skin receive many educational opportunities, especially in the form of scholarships, than those of other skin colors - something that in and of itself is racist and stupid, but hey, whatever makes people feel good, right? One can argue that "people with dark skin colors live in shittier places and get worse education," but that is not a function of skin color: it's a function of the place where they live. A person with purple skin living in the same area would have the same public school facilities, for example.

      B is also false. I've worked with black, brown, white, yellow, and even a red person or two. Guess what? They're all capable of being intelligent. It's true! I have worked with smart dark colored people! This may sound strange to you but I sure as hell hope that it doesn't.

      C is also false - in my personal experience, and the experience of many people here, and many of the people I know. I cannot recall a single instance where I have worked when someone was not hired because of skin color. Maybe you have different experiences. If so, I hope you've reported them because it is extremely illegal.

      Basically what it boils down to is this: If you believe A, then you're blind to the real problems plaguing education. If you believe B, then you're a horrible person. If you believe C, then your experience is in the extreme minority.

      So no, this is not a skin color issue. There are other issues at play here. Sorry, but it's true. Companies want to hire the best and the brightest because that is how they succeed. They don't care what someone looks like as long as that person produces results. The fact is that when we have an open position at my company we simply don't get dark skinned people applying.

      What are we supposed to do, kidnap people and force them into employment or something? THAT was wrong before the Emancipation Proclamation and it is wrong today.

    12. Re:I'm black and in tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am also black and in Tech, but I don't assume that my experience is the same for all minorities. Taken further, the question I would ask is how many black people in tech are also in management. There are possibly minorities working at IBM or Google cleaning floors and bathrooms, but how many of them are project managers? How many had access to the educational opportunities that you did?

      I grew up in an integrated neighborhood and attended an integrated high school. However, I know that there are a lot of people who grew up in de-facto segregated neighborHOODs that were typically not known for their stellar institutions of education.

      My point is that the problem is far more complex than getting a programming job at the local software sweatshop. It involves economics, access to decent health care, access to decent childcare, quality of education, and a lot of other issues.

    13. Re:I'm black and in tech by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

      And sisters?

      --
      There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
  11. So let me get this straight. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    When a white techie doesn't get the job, it's not because he isn't white enough but because he isn't competent enough, but when a black techie doesn't get the job it's never about competence but always about skin color? Ooook. Go to hell.

    1. Re:So let me get this straight. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one said that. Stop pretending that you RTFA, put your pointy hat back on, and go back to burning crosses.

    2. Re:So let me get this straight. by lucm · · Score: 1

      I'm sure there is a vast middle ground between the Rainbow Coalition and the KKK, but for some reason "tolerant people" appear not to see it that way.

      Stop pretending that you are not a phony liberal, put your iPod earbuds back on, and go back to listening to MSNBC.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
  12. Re:Maybe people would hire you if by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1, Informative

    Says the AC posting on Slashdot instead of getting some actual work done.

  13. It must be that time of the month again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yet another dumbshit article about (the lack of) diversity in the workplace brought to you by your local bleeding hearts liberals. If it's not racial, it's gender. If it's not gender, they'll cry about ethnic diversity, sexual orientation, or something else.

    Why aren't more women working in IT?
    Why aren't more men working as registered nurses?

    Why aren't more homosexuals working in IT?
    Why aren't more heterosexuals working in interior design?

    Why aren't more people of diverse racial backgrounds working in IT?
    Why aren't more people of caucasian background working in fast food?

    Why do ducks quack?
    Because they look like a duck, and sound like a duck.

    Quacking liberals.

    1. Re:It must be that time of the month again... by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Yet another dumbshit article about (the lack of) diversity in the workplace brought to you by your local bleeding hearts liberals. If it's not racial, it's gender. If it's not gender, they'll cry about ethnic diversity, sexual orientation, or something else.

      Why aren't more women working in IT? Why aren't more men working as registered nurses?

      Why aren't more homosexuals working in IT? Why aren't more heterosexuals working in interior design?

      Why aren't more people of diverse racial backgrounds working in IT? Why aren't more people of caucasian background working in fast food?

      Why do ducks quack? Because they look like a duck, and sound like a duck.

      Quacking liberals.

      And because some idiot seems likely to come along with some crap like "so says the ac," I'll echo this using my account.

      For the last time - equal opportunity does NOT mean equal outcomes. Correlation is not causation - if you can actually prove the system is biased against minorities/women/any other special interest, then do it instead of complaining the outcomes aren't what you want. If you want to prove someone isn't being paid fairly, the ONLY way to do it is show that people with equal educations, equal experience, and equal OUTPUT are not being paid equally.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    2. Re:It must be that time of the month again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you kind /.er I appreciate the echo and rationality.

    3. Re:It must be that time of the month again... by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Apparently some mod can't handle the truth.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
  14. Charles Barkely Explains by koan · · Score: 5, Interesting
    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    1. Re:Charles Barkely Explains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you, this was the recent article I was looking for. Mod up!

    2. Re:Charles Barkely Explains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is part of it. Institutional racism is also in play. So African Americans in particular are getting it from both sides. If you are well spoken and refuse to adopted the racists attitudes of colleagues, your an uppity N*gger. Unfortunately you encounter the same when interacting with other African Americans, particularly those who are less educated. What's really irritating is that most Americans (mainly white, but others too) fail to realize that both are a result of the overall racial past (and present) of this country. We are not post racial, if anything, it's just gone underground.

      Latinos, particularly those that are do not look European (read- non Cubans) often face the same preconceived notions that Black do (from both sides). While I think Asians have a different issue all together that leaves them having to challenge a different one dimensional stereotype. In the current American cultural paradigm only whites are allowed to be multi-faceted. Being forced into a one-dimensional stereotype, reinforces the the limitations on a group.

      My entire family, like many around me, don't fit into the black round peg and when I discuss this with non-blacks, they seem amazed by this. As long as the current cultural paradigm and it's history and influences are not discussed honestly, there will be little movement.

    3. Re:Charles Barkely Explains by NewYork · · Score: 1

      Charles Barkely failed to comprehend https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Front_running

  15. New owners are SJW losers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I guess the new owners of Slashdot really want to run this site into the ground as all these other English majoring losers have done to the major media outlets. First gamergate, now this.

    Listen up you nerds! You're all racists, sexists, and homophobes. The world sucks because of you. Get over it! And stop being such meanies!

  16. I judge people by their merit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not by the color of their skin

    1. Re:I judge people by their merit by gfxguy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I had this argument before w.r.t. affirmative action. I asked if they didn't want to be judged on the content of their character instead of the color of their skin, and was told - seriously - that quote is from Martin Luther King Jr., and he's "theirs," so I'm not allowed to use his quote in an argument. No,.. really.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    2. Re:I judge people by their merit by dfenstrate · · Score: 1

      I had this argument before w.r.t. affirmative action. I asked if they didn't want to be judged on the content of their character instead of the color of their skin, and was told - seriously - that quote is from Martin Luther King Jr., and he's "theirs," so I'm not allowed to use his quote in an argument. No,.. really.

      The proper response is to laugh in their face.

      --
      Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
  17. I Blame The NHL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And they pay better too.

  18. media, role models, dreams by funkymonkjay · · Score: 1

    these things all shape a kid's perspective in life and what they end up pursuing. for me it was watching movies like war games that really got me think this is what i want to do. I wonder.. if the main character was a girl... would I not have pursued it?

  19. Why are Asians always ignored in this discussion? by kruach+aum · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Are they not also a significant minority in the US? And yet somehow, they managed to vastly over-represent themselves in STEM fields. Maybe, and this may be just a wild ass guess, but maybe it's because they spent their time focusing on their homework rather than whining about diversity?

  20. apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It looks like around 10% of college graduates are black. If we're going based on that, Apple is pretty close to being there. Other companies? Not so much.

    1. Re:apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I ever have a company I'm not going to sacrifice the quality of my team so the distribution of our ethnicities fits some arbitrary figures.

    2. Re:apple by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      That's an absurd conclusion. Look at how many are graduating from STEM fields instead of liberal arts, then start making ridiculous claims like that. It's never convenient for the whiners to compare apples to apples, is it? (no pun intended)

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    3. Re:apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, just look at where that kind of thinking has taken Apple.

  21. Same here by zarthrag · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's sad, but we're rare birds. It's not the fault of any one thing. Culturally, families DO encourage it, however, there are few mentors. I just lucked out and had a dad who was a real dad worthy of mentorship, in engineering. It's rare because of.... I'll leave it at "forces of history" (internal, and external, both).

    The stereotypes can be hard to shake, though. Being taken seriously can be an obstacle. It's a different experience, I'm sure. The only way to break the cycle (IMO) is to get out there and try to teach/mentor/train (which is an entirely different can of worms.)

    --
    Why can't all fpga/microcontroller manufacturers just release free optimizing compilers???
    1. Re:Same here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Teach who? Unless your referring to teaching the people who stereotype then its usless.

    2. Re:Same here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      everyone stereotypes...

    3. Re:Same here by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 1

      everyone stereotypes...

      Citation?

    4. Re:Same here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you've incidentally hit the nail on the head in your comment. One of the primary factors that sets you aside from the average black experience is that you had good parenting. Don't get me wrong, this isn't related to anything religious (I'm an athiest!), but the debasement of the value of family has a real impact on all of this. Parents that really care make a difference. Parents who have the economic freedom to expend time on their children matter. Most important of all, having two whole parents that are together matters. One of the most important factors for rising out of poverty (which is in turn a key factor for childrens' later success in life) is families that get and stay married and raise their children as a complete household with two active parents. The benefits of having a real partner in life when raising kids are enormous. Whatever their division of labor may be between multiple jobs and/or childcare duties, having two players on the team gives them the necessary combined power to make it work well. Going it alone as a single parent puts one at a significant disadvantage economically and in the ability to raise a child properly in general.

      Well over half of black children are raised in welfare-assisted single-parent families, where the single parent is typical a working and over-worked mother with no time for proper parenting. We can argue all day long about underlying historical causes*, but there's no denying that a solution to that particular problem of good parenting with whole families would solve so many secondary problems as a natural fallout.

      * - the left will say lingering effects of slavery and Jim Crow, the libertarians say the welfare state itself causes the problem by creating avenues of dependence. I tend to believe the libertarian argument because the stats pretty clearly show that during the post-slavery era the quality of black families increased constantly (even in spite of Jim Crow still being an issue). It was at the nearly-simultaneous (from this sort of historical-economic view) moment that both Jim Crow laws were abolished and the modern welfare state came into being that the black family started disintegrating from formerly high levels of dual-parent, married households. Ever since that time, in spite of ever-increasing attempts to fix it through welfare mechanisms, the black family has been in steady decline.

    5. Re:Same here by swillden · · Score: 1

      Teach who? Unless your referring to teaching the people who stereotype then its usless.

      Not at all. Not to put words in the GPs mouth, I believe he was referring to teaching and mentoring more young black people, to give them something akin to the opportunity he got from his dad. And that is not useless. No, it doesn't change the stereotypes held by others, but do you know what will demolish those stereotypes? Significant numbers of people who defy and invalidate their stereotypes.

      In fact, that is the only thing that ever does eliminate stereotypes.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    6. Re:Same here by zarthrag · · Score: 1

      This.

      --
      Why can't all fpga/microcontroller manufacturers just release free optimizing compilers???
    7. Re:Same here by zarthrag · · Score: 1

      (Kinda wish you weren't AC, but I'll answer anyway.)

      I think there's a little truth in both views. There were a lot of [black] people and businesses in Tulsa that used to be quite well-off prior to The Tulsa Race Riot which did more damage in two days than Jim Crow ever could. Those areas are pretty much welfare neighborhoods now, rife with payday-loans and people dependent upon the government (Which I consider to be the final nail in the coffin.) What was lost (or stolen, depending on whom you ask) cannot be valued, and the effects on later generations isn't limited to that community - it takes away from everyone. Education is nil, as one more likely to end up with a criminal record than a degree (Oklahoma blacks and hispanics have a 64% graduation rate.) And state policy ensures those effects are still heading in the wrong direction.

      As for families, yes - [modern] black culture glorifies all of the wrong things which tends to lead to lots of children without [responsible] fathers. But it's inaccurate to say that's the norm everywhere. IMO, poverty and marriage simply don't mix. Two working parents can break the poverty-line, but then (in today's economic/political climate) you'll have staganation. Making too much money to qualify for (genuinely needed) help, while not making enough to make ends meet can easily destroy any family. Of the ones that stay together - Many of their children do quite well in school, and do graduate. But cannot possibly afford college. And, without stable households capable of acquiring even modest wealth, even student loans for some *really*good*kids* are totally out-of-the-question. Ensuring yet another generation of lightly-educated people, with no access to education, mentorship, or even a trade. ...and all of the limitations thereof. (For that reason, I'm actually against the idea that "college is the solution to all problems" that has been ingrained into the minds of all black parents. You can work in many fields, including IT, without a degree. It's debt-free, and if you work hard at what you do, it's upwardly mobile. More-so if you have the aptitude.)

      I don't buy into the "victim mentality" at all. I determine my own future. But I'm not alone or ashamed in the fact that I, my parents, grandparents, have to overcome significant obstacles to establish *somewhat* equal footing *starting* with my generation. Most Americans [black, white, whatever] don't seem to understand that the real damage from overt racism isn't "he's [not us], so I won't hire him or serve him food", it was "those [not us] people should never acquire education & wealth, lest they become a threat" which resulted in many calculated (and often violent) actions taken with the intent to deny wealth. Combine that history with welfare and you have a never ending cycle of: ...Poverty - the gift that keeps on giving.

      --
      Why can't all fpga/microcontroller manufacturers just release free optimizing compilers???
    8. Re:Same here by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      everyone stereotypes...

      Citation?

      I think that was supposed to be a joke.

  22. Color by BringsApples · · Score: 1

    The only thing that I can think of, as far as color goes in the IT field, is the wires. But even then, the color really doesn't mean anything, except whatever you decide to denote them as, for your own setup.

    --
    Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    1. Re:Color by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beautiful diversity:

      https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ee/24-pin_ATX_power_connector.jpg

  23. They're playing the race card again..... sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I use to work for a company that did phone support. We had a policy of hiring a certain percent of our work force as ethnic and time and time again I saw black people who flat out "didn't want to be like white people"... I also saw it growing up in school so it didn't surprise me to see it in the work place. These people were being given jobs with no skills and getting training and this is the mentality most black workers I've dealt with have. The racial bias isn't on the side of the fence at this point that most people like to think it is. Black's just want to complain they don't have something and then blame the color of their skin.

    A week ago Slashdot had another funky racist article about a black woman calling all white people homogenous because she wanted to be around more black people at work. Again we have this black vs white mentality and it's all whitey's fault for something... Not sure what it was but something... something.... white people are homogenous.....

    When I was in college (2 year community college) every quarter we had the gangsta black kids who showed up for about 2 weeks so they could collect their check for a free education. Then they would go away until next quarter. This is the reason why black people don't have high graduation numbers. Many of them are gaming the system for college and getting away with it. When I hear someone talk about this when talking about black education then we'll know someone's actually paying attention.

    1. Re:They're playing the race card again..... sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a coward

    2. Re:They're playing the race card again..... sigh by itsenrique · · Score: 1

      He's also full of shit. If you really do that with your financial aid (Pell Grant) you will only last ONE semester, then you will no longer be eligible. You know, some of your points are possibly valid, but it's pretty plain that you are yourself racist and just perpetuating the divide.

  24. Money too... by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 2

    Im a white guy, so take any "I know how to solve diversity problems" with a grain of salt, but one reason I'm able to be in tech is scholarships and grants.

    I didn't have a lot of money growing up, and once I got to college, a state school since i couldn't afford much else, I got a free ride from grants and scholarships. Since then, I've paid years and years of taxes in payroll tax, house tax, sales tax, etc. Back then, i noticed a lot more diversity in my classes. I got my first job as a reference from a Mexican engineer who knew another Mexican engineer at the place I'd end up working. I sublet from two other Mexican engineers that went to Motorola There were a few black electrical engineers, a few female CEs, etc.

    Now, it's very very expensive to go to school. If you were just on the "hey, i can barely afford to go to college" divide before, you're now on the no-I-sure-can't other side. In the US, who's more likely to be on the bad side of the can-I-afford-college question? Minorities. It's not Bull-Connor-with-a-firehose racism, but it's a filter on minorities, an extra burden on just some of us that skews numbers. And that will carry over to the next gen. Those who can't become engineers now will likely have less well paying jobs, less good school systems for their kids, and less money for kids tuition. Cycles are had to break and you really need to stop them as early as you can.

  25. It's not all lilly-White, folks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    While some racial minorities are very under-represented in IT, it is not because it's an all-White profession.

    Look around in most respectable engineering/computer science/IT-training schools and you will see many people with Indian-subcontient or Asian heritage. Not even counting current HB-1 and similar visas, you still see a significant number of people with Indian-subcontient or Asian heritage in the workforce.

    Yes, people of African and Latin-American heritage are under-represented in IT. However, they are also under-represented in other professions that typically require similar educational paths. The solution is not to pretend this is an IT problem but instead to realize that this is a society-wide issue, and solve it that way.

    Start in preschool and work up from there.

    1. Re:It's not all lilly-White, folks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While some racial minorities are very under-represented in IT, it is not because it's an all-White profession.

      Look around in most respectable engineering/computer science/IT-training schools and you will see many people with Indian-subcontient or Asian heritage. Not even counting current HB-1 and similar visas, you still see a significant number of people with Indian-subcontient or Asian heritage in the workforce.

      Yes, people of African and Latin-American heritage are under-represented in IT. However, they are also under-represented in other professions that typically require similar educational paths. The solution is not to pretend this is an IT problem but instead to realize that this is a society-wide issue, and solve it that way.

      Start in preschool and work up from there.

      So what should we be telling the Indian and Asian 3-year olds then? Don't get in IT no matter what because you might be over or under-represented? I mean if we're starting in pre-school, obviously we need to start that cultural bias early on in life, and discourage them from obvious stereotypes.

      But what about their own personal interests or mental capacity to comprehend and contribute to the field?

      No, fuck all that, we need to obviously ensure they're not going to be called a camel-jockey in the data center.

    2. Re:It's not all lilly-White, folks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work for a large U.S. based IT company that must be 75% Indian, 24.9% Asian. I feel like the token white guy. Often I'll be on a team of 30 dev'lopers and I'm the only white person.

  26. I agree with the IT workers' take... by bogaboga · · Score: 5, Interesting

    they argue that racial bias, along with lingering impressions of what a 'techie' should look like, loom much larger than any pipeline issue.

    Having once taught one of the most difficult to understand topics in mathematics, many of my students, after getting comfortable with me, told me they didn't expect me to be their teacher when they forst saw me. On one occasion, at the beginning of school, a this particular class continued with their business instead of acknowledging my presence at the podium, till I called the class to order.

    Where I now work, members of the public will gravitate toward an office assistant to help them solve a problem instead of talking to me directly. This assistant then has to advise them to talk to me if anything is to be solved. I am the chief here.

    I have gotten so used to this treatment that it doesn't bother me anymore.

    1. Re:I agree with the IT workers' take... by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      you teach in the deep south or something? or a really crappy school?
      in my math/engineering classes, we didnt have time for any of that shit. you worked your ass off. plenty of foreign students who were on 100% in every class or go home scholarships. there was never a curve.

    2. Re:I agree with the IT workers' take... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could it be your wardrobe or how you present yourself? In academic circles I have had so many non-white professors so I can't relate at all to with your classes or peers.

    3. Re:I agree with the IT workers' take... by c6gunner · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should stop carrying a mop and bucket around with you? Just an idea ...

    4. Re:I agree with the IT workers' take... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When i was at University @ Buffalo in NY back in 2006, I took calc 2 with a black prof in his 50's. He was fucking brilliant yet hugely approachable. He helped me believe I could actually understand that shit. It's hard stuff (to me anyway). /white guy who doesn't give a fuck what color the expert is. Just wants expert's help.

    5. Re:I agree with the IT workers' take... by strikethree · · Score: 1

      I am deeply curious now: What about you says that you are not the expert or in charge?

      You do not say what you think it is. Gender? Race? Mannerisms? Bearing? Age?

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
  27. Re:Maybe people would hire you if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Bosnia is in CET tz, and it's 18:00 here. Work for me ended two hours ago. What's that about AC? What's your point?

  28. Re:Why are Asians always ignored in this discussio by ADRA · · Score: 1

    Because people like to complain about their perceived natural handicaps more than breaking out of them.

    20-30 years from now when Asians dominate actual tech innovation (if they haven't already) and all the lazy white guys like myself will be slagging the 'yellow guys stealing my job', or insert some other out group who I feel threatened of.

    Racial / religious / sexual / etc.. intolerance happens, I try to avoid it like the plague but the only way to truly overcome is on a personal level. Donate money to outreach and education programs if you think it'll help (i'm doubtful) or be the shining image of what -insert said minority- can be by outshining your peers and FORCE them to recognize your achievements. Is it hard? Sure, but to assume no handicaps in this world is to welcome a very disappointing life. I'll welcome the world when we're all born with the same opportunities, but I'm not deluded enough to assume it'll happen in my lifetime.

    --
    Bye!
  29. Re:Why are Asians always ignored in this discussio by gfxguy · · Score: 1

    Are they not also a significant minority in the US? And yet somehow, they managed to vastly over-represent themselves in STEM fields. Maybe, and this may be just a wild ass guess, but maybe it's because they spent their time focusing on their homework rather than whining about diversity?

    And you never stop hearing the white people whining about it! Right? Right!?!? It never stops!

    --
    Stupid sexy Flanders.
  30. There's plenty of diversity-- but not all races by cornicefire · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I see plenty of racial diversity. There are folks from India, China, Korea, Japan and many of the islands in the south Pacific where I work. And if you look closely at the so-called "white" folk, many come from all across Europe and Arabia. Are they represented equally? No. If anything, "white" people are underrepresented compared to their percentage of the population. It's a mistake to talk about "racial diversity" when that's not really the problem. It just distracts us by framing it as a problem of white people discriminating against non-whites.

    1. Re:There's plenty of diversity-- but not all races by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      It's a mistake to talk about "racial diversity" when that's not really the problem. It just distracts us by framing it as a problem of white people discriminating against non-whites.

      To hell with white vs. non-white. I'm "offended" that my Irish and German ancestries are minimized my lumping me in with Scotts and Welshmen. This is extremely "insensitive" to my cultural heritage. Let alone lumping me in with Italians, given what the Romans did to my peoples about 1800 years ago.

    2. Re:There's plenty of diversity-- but not all races by Nethead · · Score: 1

      How the hell do you think the Scotts and Welsh feel about you being lumped it with you!

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
  31. Hispanics don't count by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course the largest minority group in this country is invisible so they can't be sure how many are working at IT companies.

  32. This does not fit the desired propaganda by s.petry · · Score: 0

    You repeated mostly what Charles Barkley said in an interview about a week back, but you missed his point that having served a prison term is considered "cool" and "street creds". Ironic that this article blames the problem on racism instead of reality, considering that I mentioned this same thing in a different propaganda thread this morning regarding misogyny.

    Certainly racism exists, but there are much bigger issues at hand. The same people propagating the "racism" arguments happen to be the same people propagating "misogyny", and the same people promoting and glamorizing a certain lifestyle through various forms of media.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    1. Re:This does not fit the desired propaganda by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      You repeated mostly what Charles Barkley said in an interview about a week back,

      It's also what Bill Cosby has been saying for years now, and it's made him a bit of a pariah among many black communities.

    2. Re:This does not fit the desired propaganda by s.petry · · Score: 1

      Do you by chance have any links to Cosby saying these things? I'm not doubting in this case, merely curious. I have read and listened to Professor Griff talk about these things, but only know Mr. Cosby for his standup routines.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    3. Re:This does not fit the desired propaganda by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Searching through Wikipedia, I think the Pound Cake speech (a speech he gave to the NAACP during a celebration of 50 years of Brown v Board of Education) is a good starting point, where Cosby criticized a culture where if someone does something bad and they get into trouble with police, the culture immediately jumps on the police rather than criticize the black youth who committed the crime in the first place. "Looking at the incarcerated, these are not political criminals. These are people going around stealing Coca-Cola. People getting shot in the back of the head over a piece of pound cake! And then we all run out and are outraged, 'The cops shouldn't have shot him.' What the hell was he doing with the pound cake in his hand? I wanted a piece of pound cake just as bad as anybody else, and I looked at it and I had no money. And something called parenting said, 'If you get caught with it you’re going to embarrass your mother.' Not 'You're going to get your butt kicked.' No. 'You're going to embarrass your family.'"

      Perhaps a better reference would be this Chicago Tribune discussion with Cosby where he ruminates on these topics. I think one of the most depressing criticisms Cosby gets is that people tell him he can't be saying these things publicly because then white people will hear it and think it's fine to say it about black people in general.

  33. Oh Crap by OzPeter · · Score: 1

    I fell for the dicevertisment again

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  34. Snooze time by lucm · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This reminds me of the anarchist scare in the 20s. The communist scare in the 50s. The nuclear holocaust in the 60s. Then the "Japan invasion" in the 80s. Then the death of the American manufacturing economy in the 90s (which is still the world's largest, believe it or not). Then the IT outsourcing to India in the 2000s. Etc.Etc.

    The only constant in this culture is people who claim it's about to collapse.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
    1. Re:Snooze time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every culture is like that.

  35. Protected at some companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On the other hand many large corporations have diversity quotas.

    At a former employer (producer of printers/copiers) minority employees were a protected category. They were completely safe from RIF's, and that was a company with continuously declining sales.

    It also applied to ADA people and LGBT's. Both of the ADA people I knew were incredibly incompetent, but both were immune to layoffs.

  36. Re:Removing /. from my bookmarks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    True indeed. And yet he was modded down.

  37. Seen it a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been working in several large companies' IT departments and time after time I'm simply astonished of the amount of racial and gender discrimination that still exists today.

    My previous work place was the worst I've seen this far, though. The people there openly laughed at incredibly racist jokes on isles and in production and mocked our department's women's capabilities to accomplish any IT related tasks. These guys didn't even mind laughing aloud at a few eugenetics jokes when we had black visitors touring our factory. I totally gave up any hope of things improving when I noticed even the head of our department took part in this.

    Well, this is how it seems to be in Finland anyway and I sincerely hope it's better elsewhere. Can't wait to get out of this cesspool of a country.

    1. Re:Seen it a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't walk, RUN from such an organization. I mean it. GET OUT NOW.

      Any group of people who really harbor such attitudes and refuse to confront them is likely going to be an issue in your life. If they really are as mean and nasty as you claim, they are dangerous to work for. Find another job and QUIT as soon as you possibly can.

    2. Re:Seen it a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's exactly what I did! I quit my job a few months ago and I'm now self employed.

      I just couldn't take it anymore, especially since along my career the most talented people I've ever worked with have been black and female.

    3. Re:Seen it a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where did you work? I want to apply!

  38. apple stats are wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple included their Retail workers in their diversity count, which is not a fair comparison to google, facebook, and other pure tech companies. There's less of a diversity problem in the Retail industry than the Tech industry. The diversity stats for Apple Corporate (non-Retail) are dismal - probably worse than the others. I know ... I work here.

  39. Re:Maybe people would hire you if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you stop at 16:00 you shouldn't be allowed to call it work.

  40. It's about competence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a manager, I have good employees, average employees and bad employees. I make every attempt to hire people with the best resumes and references. If they do well, I do well. Race never comes into the equation.
    The good employees move up, the average employees are static and the bad employees get fired.
    Period.

  41. It's Not Racism In The Tech Industry by Jawnn · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Yes, yes. There are probably a few knuckle-dragging idiots who would not hire someone because of their gender or the color of their skin, but we all know how hard it is to find good help. The very first system administrator I ever hired was female, and African-American. She was a gem and was poached from us less than 6 months later. This industry hires on merit. To deny that is absurd.

    Now, it is also undeniably true that such talent is not present in proportional numbers amongst various minorities. That's a problem, but it's not of the tech industry's doing. There's plenty of blame to go around. Many of those minorities still suffer from inadequate education. The members of those communities must shoulder some of the burden as well - it is, all too often, still not cool to be smart in those communities. Intellectual achievement is often met with derision even within families. Girls are usually conditioned against pursuing STEM interests. Such observation is not racist, or sexist. The lack of achievement is nothing to with race or gender. It has everything to do with what the community is doing, or not doing.

    1. Re:It's Not Racism In The Tech Industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I somewhat agree. But, mentoring. Very important. Women and minorities.

    2. Re:It's Not Racism In The Tech Industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      People really ought to consider that not all races are the same. we have no problem recognizing that certain races play certain sports better, but magically evolution stopped below the neck?

    3. Re:It's Not Racism In The Tech Industry by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

      Over the years I have, at times, found the software industry to be downright hostile, especially when I was at university, where the CS guys seemed extremely unwilling to suffer fools like me (I was an EE major - and I was a pretty good student, but any mistake was derided in a way that an issue about, say, physics was not). There was the attitude barrier to cross, the CS crowd there seemed to think that one should be born knowing this stuff.

      At least I looked as pasty as most of the other CS undergraduates, if my appearance or gender had been another consideration I'm not sure that I would have persisted in the field, it could easily have been the "last straw" that dissuaded me.

      --
      Nullius in verba
    4. Re:It's Not Racism In The Tech Industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This industry hires on merit

      Not always. If a company is a gov't contractor it likely has a strong incentive to hire minorities. Your gem may not have been poached after six months if it was just another white sausage.

    5. Re:It's Not Racism In The Tech Industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to really look at the parents. Is an education valuable to them or not? Do they see the world as us vs them?

      I am a foster parent and looking to adopt a brown girl (what she calls herself) we've been raising as our daughter for over 3 years now (in addition to two of our own bio "peach" kids, and another lil one that isn't ours) A bio parent for a child we are caring for told us "White people just want to steal black babies." no, we want the kids to be safe and grow up to be good people. We don't care about race.

      She came to us not even knowing how to hold a book or what it was for until we showed her. Her brothers have no real interest in school or learning (expelled from many schools each), her bio mother has no interest in education or actually having responsibility.

      The girl is growing into a smart kid with severe anxiety problems (from early life) but her stars were changed to where she will be a useful member to society damnit. We see her probably getting a full scholarship ride to college from all the minority, foster kid, learning disability stuff she has going on, but because we care we are managing and helping her through.

      When the girls do their sister love hugs, their skin colors are no different than hair or eye colors to them. That's how its supposed to be (IMHO).

      Find the best person for the job and hire them. If you are the best fit you get the job. Wasn't that MLK's real dream? That you wouldn't be judged by the color of your skin?

    6. Re:It's Not Racism In The Tech Industry by aralin · · Score: 1

      Well, there is hiring on merit for sure, but you can look at any major tech company chart and see that asian managers hire asians almost exclusively. We had one Indian VP, who made 20 consecutive hiring decisions and all hires were Indian, even if there would be 50% Indian engineers in the valley, the chance of this happening randomly is 1:1,000,000. The Chinese managers often hire Chinese not based on racism though, but the language difficulty. A lot of the brilliant Chinese engineers I worked with had english difficulties, if interviewed in english you'd think they cannot count to 5, but when later interviewed in Mandarin, they looked like genius. So you can see some amount of racism, but its mixed bag.

      And yes, we only had one black guy out of about 100, which is very low. But he was hired definitely on merit. One of the two best engineers we ever hired.

      --
      If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
    7. Re:It's Not Racism In The Tech Industry by NotSanguine · · Score: 1

      People really ought to consider that not all races are the same. we have no problem recognizing that certain races play certain sports better, but magically evolution stopped below the neck?

      What are these "races" of which you speak? I am only aware of a single sentient race on this planet -- Homo Sapiens Sapiens. Please elucidate.

      --
      No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
    8. Re:It's Not Racism In The Tech Industry by nine-times · · Score: 1

      I almost agree with you. I can say that I've worked for a few different IT companies, and in the IT departments of a few more companies, and I would say that every one of these companies has, at some point, actively looked for female and minority tech workers for the sake of diversity. That said, I've worked with very few black IT people, and I think I've only worked with one woman-- a database admin. It wasn't the result of an unwillingness to hire black people or women, but an inability to find candidates.

      That said, I don't doubt that there are some racist employers out there still. I don't doubt that there are people who subtly treat black coworkers differently, or that job interviews are sometimes influenced by race, often even if people are not consciously aware that it's happening. I can't even claim that race never influences me unconsciously, since... well, it's unconscious. How would I know? I try to be fair and open-minded, and I grew up with a lot of minorities. I don't think I'm particularly racist, but I'm not sure any of us can avoid it completely.

      I don't know how to fix it, but I don't think we can claim to have done away with racism. It comes in subtle forms-- For example, you might see a bunch of white kids failing in school, and maybe your first impulse would be to blame the school or teachers for not providing the right environment. Paint the same picture with different colors, and suddenly your first impulse is to assume that the kids and parents are to blame. It doesn't need to be a conscious, thought out decision to be racist. Sometimes, it's just a matter of which conclusions we jump to.

    9. Re:It's Not Racism In The Tech Industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXx2YNrrz6o

    10. Re:It's Not Racism In The Tech Industry by NotSanguine · · Score: 1

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXx2YNrrz6o

      I see. So, please provide appropriate taxonomic classifications as I'm confused. Thanks.

      --
      No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
    11. Re:It's Not Racism In The Tech Industry by Jawnn · · Score: 1

      ...her stars were changed to where she will be a useful member to society damnit.

      May you and your family enjoy the brightest blessings, AC. Would that all parents had even a tenth of the love and insight that your kids' parents have. Well done.

    12. Re:It's Not Racism In The Tech Industry by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The sports disparities are largely due to fairly simple characteristics. Height is a great advantage in basketball, for example, and certain subgroups of blacks tend to be tall. (It's not true that blacks in general play basketball better, but that a subgroup does.)

      It's not at all clear to me that we can do the same with more complex traits, like intelligence. We're not nearly good enough yet at measuring intelligence to exclude cultural factors, so we can't test directly. (Culture generally doesn't affect height as much, provided the child gets enough food.)

      We know there are strong cultural factors pointing to success in various fields, and we don't know that there are mental differences doing that.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  42. a single data point. by nblender · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have only a single data point so it's probably not worth anything... My only experience with a Black IT professional was a network admin for the company who took over my employer. I was the previous defacto network admin even though my job description was 'embedded firmware developer'. So this company takes us over and hires this guy as the network admin. I meet him in a conference call and his first task is to come up and migrate our servers over to their corporate platform. So I volunteer to give up my weekend to facilitate since he doesn't know our existing infrastructure... He shows up and I give him the nickle tour, show him to a meeting room where he can unpack boxes and start bolting things together. I go back to my cubicle and work on some bugs telling him "if you need anything, just come get me." ... So everything's cool. He gets things connected, and starts migrating data... Around dinner time I check in with him and suggest we go across the street for a bite and a pint while data copies across the network. We have a lovely dinner and chat about families, school, weather, previous work places, etc.. All the usual stuff when you go out for dinner with a co-worker... Then we go back to the office, stop in the machineroom and it's back to business... So that was basically the whole weekend... I made sure he had what he needed from our old servers and instead of sitting around like a lump, I try to get some work done while he configures his new servers...

    Monday afternoon, I get a call from my ex-CEO who says there's been a complaint made against me and I need to fly down to meet with HR. In short, the complaint was that I treated him like a subordinate because he's black and that I should remember he doesn't work for me and that I'm not his boss. Prior to that meeting, it hadn't really registered that he was black. I mean sure, I could tell his skin color was different but so is the skin color of 75% of the people I worked with back then. None of my other co-workers were black though. They were either of asian descent, italian, or middle eastern... To me, they're just my co-workers... So I get this mark on my employee record and everything kind of blows over. My future dealings with this IT guy were subsequently 100% about work and that was that. I stayed away from him as much as possible except when unavoidable. A year later, I left the company but reports from my ex-co-workers were that this guy had complained about at least 2 other people in the company and they had eventually let this guy go... Of course you never find out why someone is let go but they hired someone to replace him in exactly the same position almost immediately so the subtext is "this guy has too much 'victim mentality'."

    On LinkedIn, this guy doesn't seem to hold on to any jobs for more than 1-2 years and he never seems to 'move up'.

  43. I'm black and in tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amen!

    It's not bout racisim, it's about having qualified applicants. More brothers need to invest in themselves and stay in school.

  44. How many people apply? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is such bullshit. Post a job opening in IT at any size company and track who applies. Your answer lies there.

  45. NdGT by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

    White student: Neil deGrasse Tyson doesn't have anything to say about racial diversity in astrophysics.

    Black student: Neil deGrass Tyson isn't the emperor of black STEM professionals!

    White student: (to himself) He told my father he was.

  46. Asian = Multi Color by EggChen · · Score: 1

    I'm in Telecom and over here Asian includes people from India, Pakistan, Philippines as well as Eastern Asian countries. As far color diversity goes, I think we're covered. So when Google or Facebook publish their stats everyone assumes Asian = all east asian countries forgetting that Sundar Pichay is Asian. Color is well represented in our fields.

    1. Re:Asian = Multi Color by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get very confused when people call East Indians and Pakistanis "Asian." It's like walking into an "Asian" store full of Arabic and East Indian food, it doesn't make sense. Just because they're on the continent doesn't mean that's what they are referred to. You wouldn't call a Colombian an American just because the country's in South America, would you?

    2. Re:Asian = Multi Color by dodobh · · Score: 1

      That's very culture dependent. In Europe (and Asia), they are all Asians. In the US, Asian == mongoloid features.

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
    3. Re:Asian = Multi Color by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people refer to people from India and Pakistan as 'Asians' and people from further east on the continent as 'East Asians'.

  47. It's Women. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With all the focus given on getting women into the tech field (and if we are honest, we are talking about white women), imagine my shock when other people get left high and dry..

    In a world of limited resources, you can't make bets on every single horse; you have to pick and choose.

    And thus far, the choice has been overwhelming in favor of women to the detriment of others who perhaps need and are deserving of more help.

    Sad but true.

  48. I thought it was racism... by bi$hop · · Score: 1

    ...to judge a person by his or her skin color.

    So let me get this straight: When I need to fire someone, I should never take skin color into account; however, if I'm hiring for a new position, I should always take skin color into account? OK, got it.

    1. Re:I thought it was racism... by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      ...to judge a person by his or her skin color.

      So let me get this straight: When I need to fire someone, I should never take skin color into account; however, if I'm hiring for a new position, I should always take skin color into account? OK, got it.

      That's not quite right. You should never take skin color into account when hiring. However, you should take it into account when seeking people to hire, and you will be chastised if you don't end up with a particular racial mix in your workforce at all levels. But obviously, you have no reason to consider race when making hiring decisions.

  49. makes no sense by silfen · · Score: 1

    If you check at the "diversity reports" from tech companies and compare them with US demographics, you'll find that whites are underrepresented in IT, while Asians are strongly overrepresented. And a lot of those Asians are Indians (i.e., fairly dark skinned).

    How can those demographics possibly be explained by white racism?

  50. Re:Maybe people would hire you if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I stop usually stop by 16:00, of course I get started at 5:00, and I'm not talking about when I get out of bed (that's at 4), that's when I sit down and start working. But hey, if you think an 11 hour day isn't long enough, well, screw you.

  51. The System's Crashed! Quick! Get Me ... by handy_vandal · · Score: 1

    " ... a young man with a ponytail and an earring!"

    Doesn't say "young white man", but one might infer as much from the ponytail.

    --
    -kgj
  52. Can I claim discrimination because I am a US citiz by johncandale · · Score: 1

    As Parent pointed out. Can I claim discrimination because I am a US citizen yet? Also the article is nonsense. If anything a company would be falling over themselves to hire a qualified black man, for many reasons. it is just a classic 'the first time it got hard they quit and later blamed it on racism' shtick.

  53. What an idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...they argue that racial bias, along with lingering impressions of what a 'techie' should look like, loom much larger than any pipeline issue."

    Um that quote is from an idiot. The problem is cultural; not racial. Sounds like just another excuse, in a long line of excuses, to use race in justifying racism in giving preferential treatment to students.

    That's so last century. Get over it.

  54. Because they're white. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As in, close enough to white that hey, welcome to the white people's club, as far as most things are concerned.

    Note that white people do not have an actual club, nor do we hand out provisional memberships to said imaginary club, but certain fucktarts like to insist we do.

    Well, I mean, we have Costco memberships, but we pride ourselves on offering them to anyone who can buy one.

  55. Fuck off slashdot. by Pino+Grigio · · Score: 0

    OK, this is the last article I ever read on slashdot. As a white male who works in the tech industry I come here to read about tech. Over the last few years every other article seems to be about some resentful group or another who I'm oppressing by existing, having white skin pigment, having male genitals or being heterosexual.

    If you hate your readership that much slashdot, why should I patronize your shitty website?

    It's time to fuck off, so off I am going to duly fuck.

    1. Re:Fuck off slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buh bye! Godspeed, enjoy your unquestionably well deserved white male upper-middle-class privilege granted to you by God himself, and don't the door hit your ass on the way out.

    2. Re:Fuck off slashdot. by spud_boy_65986534 · · Score: 0

      Right on bro. I'm gone too.

  56. There is discrimination at the door by line-bundle · · Score: 1

    I am black. Let me tell you my story. This was my last attempt to enter the IT industry

    Once upon a time, a big financial company whose name ends in "berg" and begins with "Bloom" came to my school for an onsite interview for financial software developers. I went to the interview and blew their socks off. They told me there and then that we want you in New York for the final interview. They flew me to NY that evening and put me up in a hotel not far from their office.

    Next morning I went to the office for the final interview. The HR lady looked at me and told me the position has been filled. No interview, no nothing. I never tried for any programming job since then. The end.

    I left the computer field for pure finance, only doing programming purely as a hobby now.

    1. Re:There is discrimination at the door by quietwalker · · Score: 1

      I can relate. I've had the same experience, applying for an IT job at a large bank, aside from a number of other places. They'd fly or voucher me out, I'd do the interview or two, managers would already be assigning projects, and then I'd be excluded for no apparent reason.

      At one point, I had a company tell me that they were only hiring programmers with sysadmin experience (which I had) but that I had to have BOTH and ONLY "system administrator" and "software developer" as my job title for the last 5 years. Obviously this is literally not possible - I'm guessing they probably had an H1B on the hook already and I was just a seat-filler for the visa qualification process.

      Once, I had actually signed a contract already, and they came in prior to their final stamp of authorization and cancelled it out of nowhere.

      Another time when applying for a job at IBM in a good-ole-boy run office in North Carolina - and this was a fond memory - the hiring manager actually called me a liar and said that someone like me could not possibly have either the experience or expertise I claimed I did, based on nothing other than my appearance(*).

      Two differences though; 1) I'm white, 2) I kept applying for other jobs.

      Eventually I got actual job offers from actual companies.

      Nothing in your story seems to indicate to me that race was an issue, or that it was anything out of the ordinary. You can't assume discrimination when more often than not it's a budget issue, or requires coordination among 3 or more departments with any one of them being able to issue a veto site unseen.

      * - The appearance thing was because I was young and had been working as a sysadmin & dev since I was 16 and had more experience than they expected - it wasn't agism. They tested me and offered me the job anyway since both their DBA and lead programmer stated 'He could probably teach us'. The hiring manager said that he still believed I lied on the resume, but they'd "try me out" anyway.

    2. Re:There is discrimination at the door by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      ima have to call bs.

    3. Re:There is discrimination at the door by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Okay, but here's the thing. Your conclusion was that it happened because you're black. I think that's a hasty conclusion.

      Not only are you black, but also you were dealing with a big, probably disorganized company. The larger the organization, the more moronic its hiring practices can be, and the more they can accidentally poop on candidates. I'm white, have a CS PhD, and have experienced similar things.

      Also, even if you did actually run into racism, I suspect it's rarer than you expect. Running a software company is so difficult that one generally wants the most productive, high-quality software developers available. There's rarely enough wiggle room to accommodate personal bigotry. Most of us care a lot more about having our company succeed so we can be wealthy, than we do about skin color.

      Also, you had one bad job interview experience, right out of school, and you quit the entire profession? I know that's discouraging, but seriously, you need to grow some backbone.

    4. Re:There is discrimination at the door by line-bundle · · Score: 1

      I did not say I had one. I said the last interview I had. Trust me, I had done plenty of interviews.

    5. Re:There is discrimination at the door by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      If you're good at software development, and black, there's no shortage of companies that want you. Especially those that do business with the federal government. You'll easily be chosen over more qualified white males. You may want to consider working in a region that does lots of federal contracting.

    6. Re:There is discrimination at the door by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      It must be wonderful to always have racism as an excuse. When shitty things like that happen to me, I have to wonder if maybe I screwed up somehow. You never have to question yourself; just blame whitey!

    7. Re:There is discrimination at the door by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Almost the same happened to me with Accenture, Tata and all other crappy consultant agencies, I'm not black by the way, we can cry together if you want to.

    8. Re:There is discrimination at the door by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Trust me, I had done plenty of interviews.

      Let me tell you about the last interview I had for a chemist opening. I went to the main conference in the world for these kinds of chemists (Pittsburgh Conf., analytical). Met with an interviewer, they liked me, wanted me to fly out for an interview.

      Seven AM I get to the airport, the ticket has been cancelled. They had cancelled the interview without even bothering to tell me.

      It must have been racism. That's the only reason I can imagine they wouldn't want to hire me.

    9. Re:There is discrimination at the door by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      It must have been racism. That's the only reason I can imagine they wouldn't want to hire me.

      I genuinely can't tell if you're being facetious.

    10. Re:There is discrimination at the door by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A more reasonable conclusion is that the people that sent you to NY for the second interview did it so quickly because they knew that things were being finalized for someone else. They were hoping to get you in as fast as they could before the papers were signed. Simple as that. You (they) were just a day too late.

      Really now, an odd thing happened after another odd thing and you did not connect the two? Call it Weird In Weird out.

  57. Another hand wring about a non-existent problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is it a problem that blacks are underrepresented in IT? Why is it a problem that women are underrepresented in IT? Why must all of society fret about such things? How about letting people just do what they are interested in? The institutional barriers are gone and have been illegal for decades. That's why the whole "white privilege" meme was invented - in order to perpetuate the victim/oppressor narrative that has been used to demand special treatment.

    If we are to be so worried about representation not satisfying strict proportionality, then let's not fall back on double standards. Blacks are wildly overrepresented in government bureaucracies. I think HHS is something like 60% black. Let's start firing some blacks to make way for whites and Hispanics.

    Seriously, the article is a bunch of hand wringing based on false premises about a problem which is only a problem to people with political agendas.

    1. Re:Another hand wring about a non-existent problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a real simple reason why the tech industry is mostly white males. It was mostly invented by white males!

      If women and minorities want to work in tech, why don't they go out and start the next Apple or IBM or Microsoft, and then they can hire whomever they want?

      It's getting real tiresome hearing from people who do nothing but wait for whitey to build something worth having, and then stick their hand out and cry discrimination. If everyone was as "equal" as the lefties claim we are, this wouldn't even be a discussion. Why is it incumbent on white males to be "inclusive"? Since when is it our responsibility to build a world to please them?

      If You don't like living in a country where you're a minority, I can assure you there are plenty of countries where people like you are a majority. Why don't you want to live in one of them?

    2. Re:Another hand wring about a non-existent problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...If women and minorities want to work in tech, why don't they go out and start the next Apple or IBM or Microsoft, and then they can hire whomever they want?...

      ummm, there's been a few pretty significant women in tech ...
      Ada Lovelace, Grace Hopper, Lois Haibt, Sophie Wilson, Jean Bartik ...

  58. Dear lord... by Dimwit · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Okay, here's the deal. I am passionate about computer science and programming. It's what I do, both for my job, and as my only hobby. I write code for open source projects, and I write code for work, and I design little one-off projects for my own entertainment.

    I stayed up all night every summer growing up teaching myself how to code. When I go to the used book store, I go to the section and buy old computer science textbooks talking about esoterica (I'm the only person I know under 45 who knows any APL, for example). My bedtime reading last week was the Oberon System manual that I got off eBay for $5.00.

    All this was despite the fact that I grew up in rural Texas and got my ass beaten on a daily basis for being a "geek". The fact that my family was the only non-Christian family in town meant that I couldn't go to the school administration for help; when I tried it turned into a "let's pray for you, son." And yet, I kept doing it because I was passionate about it.

    And guess what? If you're that passionate about something, you'll do it regardless of what your peers think. You'll *make* it happen. We didn't have any money growing up, so I'd stay after school and work on the computers there. When we finally scraped up enough money to buy a used Commodore 64 in like 1992, I had that hooked up to an old black-and-white TV and taught myself 6502 assembly.

    So yeah, I'm sick of people saying "it's someone else's fault that I can't do this." No, it's not. If you're passionate enough about it, you'll *make* it happen.

    --
    ...but it's being eaten...by some...Linux or something...
    1. Re: Dear lord... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Racist!!!

    2. Re:Dear lord... by swillden · · Score: 1

      If you're passionate enough about it, you'll *make* it happen.

      Of course. That's almost a tautology.

      The question is, how much passion does it take? I submit that an inner-city black kid would have required even more passion than you had to do the things that you did. He'd not only have had to overcome the "geek" label, but the "white" label as well. I've been studying a lot of black American history lately and I can't blame blacks at all for wanting to hold proudly to their racial identity, not after what they've been through (and don't fool yourself that just because few living black Americans lived directly under slavery or its even more pernicious and brutal reincarnation during Jim Crow that blacks today aren't really affected), but it's an unfortunate truth that black racial pride often views education-based economic success, or anything that might lead that way, as "whiteness".

      In addition, it doesn't end even after people make it out, get through school and land a job. Consider this story, of a black woman who succeeded in IT but then found that the unremitting small stresses of being "different" took a major toll on her happiness, and even her health. Like many chronic stressors, she didn't even fully realize what merely feeling like an outsider all the time was doing to her, until she happened to spend a little time in a place where she didn't stand out.

      There are other minorities in IT who don't suffer the same pain of differentness, who are less sensitive to it. And there are others who are much more sensitive; most of them just wouldn't make it where Erica did. I happen to know that I'm mildly sensitive to "differentness" myself, though it takes months of being immersed in an environment where I'm the only tall white guy before I start to feel it.

      So, you can't just sweep it under the rug with "if they care enough, they'll do it", because while that's true, it may be that enough is way too much. And it's a multi-faceted problem. Cultural obstacles, stereotypes in school and workplace, not fitting in, and there'e probably more.

      All of these layers of obstacles can be overcome by passion, sure. But, jeez, at some point the hurdles are so high that hardly anyone is passionate enough.

      We can't remove all of the obstacles, or even just all of the obstacles except the ones that you and I had to face, but we should do what we can and it starts by not sweeping the issue under the rug with "If you're passionate enough about it, you'll make it happen."

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    3. Re:Dear lord... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the problem isn't racism? It's that victims of racism aren't passionate enough to overcome it?

      "Hey, black kid! You're suspended from school. What, you say the white kid did the same thing and didn't get such a harsh punishment? Now you're misbehaving even more. We cannot tolerate this attitude in our schools! I may have to call the police."

      Blacks are given more suspensions and expulsions from school than whites and for doing the same thing. Just like with prison sentencing and the war on drugs and zero tolerance policies being harsher on blacks when whites do the same thing. But I guess if they were passionate enough they would just overcome it. So that should be our solution. Blacks need to be more passionate. Problem solved. Fuck MLK Day as a holiday, we need to celebrate this amazing post that explains away racism as a lack of passion among the black community. Dear lord...

    4. Re:Dear lord... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, so it sucks to be black in America. Now, name one country where blacks are doing better. Given there are plenty of black majority countries, that one ought to be a no-brainer, right?

  59. Remember: Cultural, not racial by Theovon · · Score: 1

    In engineering and academia, I've appreciated those rare black colleagues. For one thing, they were all much more social (and it is well established that culturally and/or genetically, africans statistically have superior social ability to whites and asians), so I could enjoy hanging out with them more. Another is that they had different things to say, making our work environment litterally more diverse in terms of ideas.

    However, in many ways, those black colleagues were not extremely "black" culturally. Dialectally, they sounded more mainstream, along with their general comportment.

    As others have pointed out here, the biggest barrier to blacks getting into white collar jobs is black culture. Those who manage to escape the anti-education indoctrination demonstrate themselves to be just as smart as everyone else. It's not politically correct to suggest that different genetic sub-groups (i.e. races) might have different intelligence levels (albeit just averages), but it's anthropologically, it's an important question. However, what we find is that the culture dominates so strongly that we can't even begin to explore that question. (And of course, it is both stupid and unethical to assume that every member of a race is equivalent to the average (whatever that is) and prejudge them on that basis.)

    1. Re:Remember: Cultural, not racial by ndykman · · Score: 1

      The reason it's not correct to state that different genetic sub-groups might have different intelligence levels is that there is no evidence that there is any significant difference between any population or group overall genetically.

      You mention anthropology. Yes, there is an interest in studying how our population grew and spread over the planet. To do this, they do sophisticated analysis to detect certain changes to try and model how the population moved.

      Here's the problem, you've assumed that these grouping are significant outside population migration. They aren't. If you take the genome as a whole, these variations are nothing compared to individual variation.

      It's not culture that has caused the problem not to be looked into. It has been, significantly, and some people in our culture refuse to accept the results. That our perception of race and racial differences are completely environmental, and there is no basis whatsoever in science to say that one population is smarter than the other.

      Again, this is a lot of posturing to try and ignore that as a society, we systemically have placed a certain set of people at a large disadvantage for no reason than our fears. We only talk about black culture because our history caused us to set apart a population first as property, then as second-class citizens, and then as "different' when convenient to explain why a group is poor or lazy or ambitious or whatever bucket we try to force people into.

      Here's the point. Every time genetic differences comes up, it's "Are blacks less intelligent?" "Are Asians better in school?" "Are Latinos less motivated" and so on. All these are dumb questions. But, never, never have I seen: "Are whites more prone to discriminate against other groups?" It's still a dumb question, but it doesn't come up, does it.

    2. Re:Remember: Cultural, not racial by Theovon · · Score: 1

      Just to be clear, I am pefectly well aware that "racial" groups have far more overlap in genetic diversity than they have differences. You can compare individuals in intelligence. You can compare population averages, although the averages aren't all that different. But even if the averages were much different, you couldn't project population averages to individuals, because the population variances are huge.

      If Neanderthals were still around (more than some genetic remnants), it would be cool to analyze the differences. I suspect that they wouldn't be generally less intelligent than homo sapiens, but that they'd have slightly different strengths and weaknesses. I could see that being really useful for team building with complementary skill sets. As it is, with all of our "racial diversity" humans are a monoculture compared to what it would be like if we had more high intelligence species.

      Anyhow, "Are whites more prone to discriminate against other groups?" isn't necessarily a dumb question. None of those questions is stupid from the point of view of detached scientific inquiry. The answers are all going to be mostly or completely "No," but science is often about asking stupid questions, even if the effect is to provide quantifiable evidence for something we intuitively knew. Also, that the answers are "no" is not intuitive to everyone. Moreover, slashdot has linked to plenty of cases where scientists tested something "obvious" and the results came out different from what we expected.

      There IS some basis to say that some populations (on average) are smarter than others, when it comes to variation in specific strengths and weaknesses. Racial groups have been apart long enough that we've all adapted a little bit to slightly different environments. We're all more or less well-adapted to those environments, and since those environments have some differences, we're going to have some differences. An example is skin color. It's likely that humans living in Africa 1/2 million years ago had a medium brown complexion, owing to the higher density of trees, greater moisture, and other factors making sunlight exposure less than it is now. As the environment in Africa became more arid and sunnier, humans there adapted to develop darker skin, while those who migrated to the far north developed lighter skin so as better absorb the more limited UV radiation and generate enough Vitamin D. (Incidentally, Inuits are too dark to generate enough Vitamin D where they live, so traditionally, they would get it from blubber. Now that they have adopted more western diets, they're getting sick due to insufficient calciferols.) Another difference often pointed out (but hot much if it's genetic I'm not sure) is how Africans tend to have superior social ability. Although this doesn't necessarily imply anything about other components of intelligence, it may represent a tradeoff, where different human groups all have about the same average intelligence, and as a result, greater social intelligence will trade off against other kinds of intelligence. One example I recall reading about many years ago pertained to children with cognitive impairment. A white child with an 80 IQ will be generally retarded, while a black child with an 80 IQ will be socially normal.

      BTW, I've always argued that social intelligence is a major blind spot for IQ testing. That doesn't mean that IQ is useless. It just means that sometimes, IQ will underestimate someone's over-all intelligence if they are smarter in an area that IQ doesn't test for. There are other kinds of intelligence left out of IQ, such as bodily–kinesthetic.

      And one last thing. In 100 years, hopefully this line of inquiry regarding racial intelligence will be as boring as questions about gender intelligence. Also, hopefully gay marriage will be boring too. We'll have some knowledge about these things, but we won't prejudge people on those basis. We won't assume the neighborbood is going to hell if a minority family moves in, and we won't disown

    3. Re:Remember: Cultural, not racial by ndykman · · Score: 1

      I think the sources for "some populations on average are smarter than others" are needed. Same with the "superior social ability". I've seen nothing that suggests that either are true and that they can be attributed to a genetic difference and not to social or environment confounders. The consensus is that it's not worth studying. The genomic data shows that any influence or different in complex behaviors would be just noise and impossible to measure in the face of strong confounders. The point is that these perceived "differences" between races (a term that many argue has no scientific basis) are in fact incredibly small genetic despite their outward appearance.

    4. Re:Remember: Cultural, not racial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [...] Africans tend to have superior social ability. [...] it may represent a tradeoff, where different human groups all have about the same average intelligence, and as a result, greater social intelligence will trade off against other kinds of intelligence.

      It would seem more logical to me to attribute it to a superior intelligence overall. If I know, for example, that a bird has a beak particularly strong, I won't think "it's probably a tradeoff, its claws must be very weak". On the contrary, if it can produce strong keratin/bones for its beak, it can probably do it for its claws too.

    5. Re:Remember: Cultural, not racial by ogunsiron · · Score: 1

      I think the sources for "some populations on average are smarter than others" are needed. Same with the "superior social ability". I've seen nothing that suggests that either are true and that they can be attributed to a genetic difference and not to social or environment confounders. The consensus is that it's not worth studying. The genomic data shows that any influence or different in complex behaviors would be just noise and impossible to measure in the face of strong confounders. The point is that these perceived "differences" between races (a term that many argue has no scientific basis) are in fact incredibly small genetic despite their outward appearance.

      ----- Yeah, I totally feel like digging up sources. It looks totally like you would not dismiss the sources out of hand.

    6. Re:Remember: Cultural, not racial by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      You can find plenty of sources for intelligence differences between racial groups. The ones I've seen have been crap science, but I can't really generalize to the ones I haven't seen.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    7. Re:Remember: Cultural, not racial by Theovon · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but average human brain size is fairly consistent as well. Well, it varies a lot, actually, but more randomly, not correlated with race.

  60. Does Dr. Dre count? by sootman · · Score: 1

    /ducks

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  61. Re:Why are Asians always ignored in this discussio by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

    i doubt that will happen. asian countries have their own cultural obstacles to being and the forefront of tech.

  62. not again by Sperbels · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First, we have constant articles on gender discrimination. Are we now going to get race discrimination articles? If we're all such white male racists here in Tech, why would women or black people even want to work here. These articles are getting so tiresome it almost feels like we're getting deliberately trolled.

    1. Re:not again by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      First, we have constant articles on gender discrimination. Are we now going to get race discrimination articles? If we're all such white male racists here in Tech, why would women or black people even want to work here. These articles are getting so tiresome it almost feels like we're getting deliberately trolled.

      It strikes me as click-baiting. It's abhorrent, but if you look at the numbers, something about the topic does keep us coming back for more, over and over.

    2. Re:not again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL! Funny, you actually make a great point without realizing it.

      "If we're all such white male racists here in Tech, why would women or black people even want to work here."

      Please consider, that yes, perhaps women and blacks do not want to work here because of the white male racists. I say this in all seriousness.
      As a person of color, I sometimes have to roll my eyes and accept the racism I see in the industry. Asians treated like technical workhorses who never get any advancement in management. Indian immigrants who are way underpaid and don't have the ease of just finding better employment if their companies mistreat them. And yes, blacks and women whose opinions just aren't taken as seriously.

      It's sad that all I read here are a bunch of anecdotes from white men on this. Well, on the side of people of color, we have anecdotes too. But who has the correct perspective here? Let's use science! (This is Slashdot, after all.) If we send resumes to companies that are identical, except for the name where one is highly Western like "John Smith" and the other is considered more ethnic like "José Hernández", the John Smith resumes seem to get interviews while the other does not. We have done plenty of studies that illustrate this beyond anecdotes.

      But let me share you my anecdotes in Silicon Valley. My first employer in Belmont was upset over a black customer and said to me, "Ya know, ever since these n-ggers got a black president, they think they're so entitled." I quit that job. Later I was being interviewed at another company and was asked, "May I ask your background, where you're from?" He wanted to know my ethnicity. I should have reported this, but regret not doing so (I wanted the job and he's in a position of power). On one team, we were getting a new manager who was a woman and before she even came on, without knowing a single thing about her experience or her expertise, the response from the all male team was about how they were worried she would "be like a mom" and if they would have to stop their guy talk. Random guy talk like about how awesome it would be to sell shirts that say, "Rape! Deal with it!"

      FYI, the best team I ever worked on was a small team with an African-American guy, white woman, Vietnamese guy, Mexican guy, another guy from the middle-east, a Canadian woman, an old white guy, and a mixed race person of color (me). Now, all these individual people had great qualities needed to do the work that you would expect from anyone. But the diversity of perspective and approaches to problem solving was clear and appreciated by the team. I share this part because there is no reason to feel threatened by black people. It will be beneficial to you to have qualified black people on your team.

      I think what scares a lot of white guys is the perception that they will lose something in some way. And that they will be forced to work with less competent people in order to improve the numbers for racial diversity. And even worse, the worry that a qualified white guy is going to not get a job, in favor of a less qualified person of color. And of course, what if that white person is you? Scary! My friends, let me reassure you, this is not the case. Look at the example about the resumes I gave. The problem is a qualified person of color is losing to an equally or less qualified white. If we take steps to ensure racism isn't an issue for people of color, the unqualified white guy you work with is going to be replaced by a more qualified black guy who should have gotten the job in the first place, and your life will be better for it, because you'll have a competent coworker to rely on, instead of the village idiot who only got hired because he's from the same village as HR and the hiring manager. So let me state this more clearly: If we hire on merit and can eliminate the racism (and combat the unconscious prejudice and bias we ALL have), we will both improve the racial diversity in the industry AND have more qualified workers in the industry. This is good for everyone and we can all be friends. :)

    3. Re:not again by Sperbels · · Score: 1

      I sometimes have to roll my eyes and accept the racism I see in the industry

      Oh please. There's no racism endemic to the industry. It's just society in general. There's nothing special about tech.

    4. Re:not again by russotto · · Score: 1

      As a person of color, I sometimes have to roll my eyes and accept the racism I see in the industry. Asians treated like technical workhorses who never get any advancement in management. Indian immigrants who are way underpaid and don't have the ease of just finding better employment if their companies mistreat them.

      Yes, Indians and other Asians are treated like technical workhorses and never get any advancement in management. Like Satya Nadella, Sundar Pichai, Qi Lu, Amit Singhal, etc. Never got anywhere.

    5. Re:not again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, we have constant articles on gender discrimination. Are we now going to get race discrimination articles? If we're all such white male racists here in Tech, why would women or black people even want to work here. These articles are getting so tiresome it almost feels like we're getting deliberately trolled.

      I'm generally not a conspiracy nut, but... If people hear something enough, they tend to start to believe it. Maybe not even actively, but it changes their perceptions and creates bias in actions. And it can be very subtle.

    6. Re:not again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is click-bait bull. Nerds are one of the few people-groups that fanatically value function over form. You could say that it is this single belief that makes one a nerd. Because of this inverted value structure (inverted from the more typical 'form over function'), nerds don't care if you are black, white, male, female, brain-in-a-jar, artificial intelligence, or a hive mind of distributed nodes. Can you think critically about problems and develop working, innovative solutions? If yes, congratulations, you are one of us. If no, go back to school. You don't get points nor demerits for aesthetic qualities, unless they are somehow relevant to a functional purpose or at least don't interfere with said function.

      This valuation causes a lot of adversarial conflicts. As an example, a nerd isn't interested in how flowery your oration is, they are interested in the concept you are attempting to communicate. As such, people who get by in life with content-free bullshit-speak and a pretty face don't command the same respect among nerds as they are accustom to, which causes resentment.

    7. Re:not again by RyoShin · · Score: 1

      These articles are getting so tiresome it almost feels like we're getting deliberately trolled.

      Probably:
      1) Discrimination (race or gender) is a hot button issue for a lot of people. As you'll find in the comments for these kind of stories, you'll even get a lot of people who claim they don't care yet feel the need to inform everyone else they don't care.
      2) More comments = more views = more ad impressions
      3) It helps Slashdot/Dice appear to be aligned with the "caring" or "equality" side (which can spur on more commenters)

    8. Re:not again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Later I was being interviewed at another company and was asked, "May I ask your background, where you're from?" He wanted to know my ethnicity. I should have reported this

      It's called a softball question. It's supposed to break the ice in an interview. There is no nefarious purpose behind it. Paranoia doesn't suit you.

  63. The real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IS hiring or not hiring someone base on skin color, it should be about who best fits the job description FINAL.

    Only one race on this planet and it's humans unless you can tell me that someone comes from a dolphin, the other from an elephant and someone else from a cat, where all the same.

    Who cares about %%% , these are only statistics and NO ONE should be hired because you need to fit in a ratio somewhere

  64. Re:Maybe people would hire you if by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

    Way to screw up my joke with your time zone facts.

  65. Shenanigans! by DakotaSmith · · Score: 0

    I call shenanigans.

    I just left teaching IT at the collegiate level (a trade school). There are two issues:

    1. Not many black students enter IT programs. Don't ask me why. I have theories, but to voice them might open me to charges of racism. Suffice to say that I heard a black commentator recently bemoan how some black people denigrate other black people who try to better themselves. They call it "acting white."

      IT is bettering yourself. It's "acting white."

    2. The vast majority of High School graduates are now outright illiterate. They cannot read nor write nor perform the most basic math.

      Want real fun? Try teaching binary logic and arithmetic to students who can count to ten if they remember to include both their thumbs.

      I had students that were unaware that books had page numbers. Consider the implications of that, for a moment.

    We have raised an entire generation of illiterate ignorami. Small wonder that this might include black people, who tend to be hurt even worse than whites in situations like this.

    We have raised an entire generation of illiterate ignorami.

    --
    Microsoft leads to Bluescreen; Bluescreen leads to downtime; downtime leads to suffering.
    1. Re:Shenanigans! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. I know several black IT professionals ranging from tech desk people, software developers, business analysts, and project managers. A couple even teach IT courses at some local colleges. The problem isn't colleges not doing enough to recruit blacks. It is the community that holding them back. One even said that he was beaten up as a kid because his mom was going to put him in a better school. The other kids in the neighborhood accused him of "acting white" for trying to get an education. Until that is fixed, there is not much colleges are going to be able to do.

  66. Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This doesn't have a fucking thing to do with racism.

    Now... if there were a couple million american africans that were being turned down in favor of other races, that I could understand.

    The fact that there are a significantly/statistically low number of american africans have historically had access to computers has a whole lot more to do with this than any 'perceived' racism.

    At the technology level we don't really give a shit what you look like, it's your ability to work with others without being a fuckwad that's most important. I've met an equal number of fuckwads from all races.

    Piss off and go find something useful to devote your energy towards. Like getting more computers in front of american africans. (Yeah, if you were born in africa and moved to america you'd be an african american. You didn't though so you're an american african)

  67. Coworkers and Culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have had two co-workers who were black, but only one whom I worked with closely. One whom was heavy on the road to alcoholism. He came from San Francisco and moved to our small little town for a job. My town is mostly white with a largish Spanish and Mexican culture mixed in. I am not sure exactly why he came out here, but he was, as best I could tell, terribly home sick. While I don't think I ever applied any particular racist views on him, I am sure the culture felt toxic to him. Perhaps it was racism, perhaps it was subtle differences, like asking for his drivers license at his bank when other people would just show their ATM card and get access to their bank account. Is that racism when it happened more often to him than others or is that the affects of a small town seeing someone who doesn't fit their cultural norms? I get that "black culture" tends to be self-defeating. I get most techies are not trying to be racist, but I do wonder if there is something subconscious also at work. Consider the TAL episode that suggests black students are punished more harshly than white students: http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/538/is-this-working Consider the study that showed white people had more physiological reaction from seeing a needle go into a white or purple arm compared to a black arm: http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2010/05/27/racial-bias-weakens-our-ability-to-feel-someone-elses-pain/

    I don't know if we know if it is cultural or biological or a mix. But there is something beyond just blaming black culture.

  68. Missing Information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's surveys/posts/studies like this that drive me nuts...they are incomplete. Although statistically there is a low # of black IT folks, does that make it wrong? Here are some topics/points the article should at least bring up, even if they don't address them:

    1)Do black folks even WANT to go into the IT field to begin with? What are black kids interested in late in high school or college? What stops them from pursuing a career in IT?

    2)The IT field is huge...salaries start around $30k for a phone support rep to over $70k for a programmer to over $100k for a high-up manager to over $200k for a CIO or CTO. Saying that blacks are paid ~$3500 less than others is pointless unless the survey gives the details. And besides, let's say it's someone getting paid $55,000 vs $58,500...so what! a)employees should not and do not need to know what their peers are earning and b)the difference could simply be experience or better salary negotiations or 10 other reasons why...it doesn't HAVE to be racism. And is this survey comparing a phone rep to a db admin or what?! Come on, details!

    3)As someone pointed out, a small % of black males graduate college and hence a small part of that % go on to the IT field...you can't blame the IT field for a lack of particular clientele you want. You have to go back to the WHY question...why aren't there more blacks going into IT when in college?...which should spawn more WHY questions. However, I disagree with folks that state companies will hire IT folks who never attended college...In general, that's a load of baloney. It's not about certifications. There may be certain entry-level IT jobs you could get without a college degree, but still, the vast majority of companies are looking for college grads for IT positions. You, I, and others may not like the reality, but that's the reality. I started in phone support in 1993 (for a very large company with dozens of products) and 100% of my 75+ peers were college grads...not all CS degrees, but 100% college grads. I went and got my CS degree simply for the act of getting the stupid piece of paper. Yup. Because I knew WITHOUT a college degree (and I graduated high school in 1989), a)job openings in general would be limited to me and b)IT job openings would be EXTREMELY limited to me.

    4)What is the correct % for blacks (or any race in ANY job title) to be in IT field positions? 50%? 51%? Seriously...when will all these stats questions end? There will never be a perfect harmony of every race/religion/age/gender/etc. regarding employment. I am very serious on what the % should be to make whoever is complaining happy. Do I complain that a very high % of American basketball and football players are black? Nope. Do I complain that most nurses are female? Nope. Do I complain that most mall retailers hire mostly people under 25? Nope. And what's the IT race % for Indian or Asian in US companies?...the article states "blacks hold less than 8 percent of all information technology jobs in U.S"...ok...well maybe it's 8% black, 15% Indian, 15% Asian, 10% Other, and 52% White.

    I may not have hit every question/topic that this article failed to address, but these incomplete surveys do nothing but rattle people's nerves.

  69. West Coast demographics by PPalmgren · · Score: 1

    Just curious, are you on the west coast? Something I noticed is that these newsline stories tend to focus on companies headquartered on the west coast. I just looked, and apparently California is only ~7% black. I wonder if diversity is a bit stronger in different areas, maybe an east coast IT company? Of course, this brings up the topic of lack of hispanics in IT out there, but that's another story.

    1. Re:West Coast demographics by zarthrag · · Score: 1

      No, the midwest. Oklahoma - to be specific. I think, with the exception of the south, the population in most cities are similar - though my own neighborhood is about as far as it gets from being segregated in any way.

      --
      Why can't all fpga/microcontroller manufacturers just release free optimizing compilers???
  70. My experience... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A few years ago, I helped interview new grads for my employer for entry level programming positions. Among the candidates were a couple of promising fellows from a well-regarded "Black" university (that such an institute would exist at that point in history shocked me but c'est la vie). These were graduates with bachelor degrees in computer science. We were stunned to learn that they had never taken even a single programming course - they were looking to be project managers. Needless to say, they were not hired as programmers.

    If this sort of thing still goes on, I'm not surprised at a surfeit of black folks in IT.

  71. My take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a black IT pro. Here is something that happen to me.....

    I am a programmer but being a techie I dabble in other areas. One company I worked for there was a problem with a server configuration so being proactive and a team player as, I was good friends with many of the network and system engineers. So I went and got the server working, partly as a favor to one of my network buddies. Upon leaving the server room after the problem was resolved I was greeted by one of my managers who was coming over the thank the person who fixed the server. When he saw me he said "Oh you fixed that I didn't expect someone like you to know that." He was a nice enough manager and I could tell there was no ill-will. So jokingly I said "What do you mean by that?" just pointing what was said as I did not think he thought about what he was implying. When he realized how it came across he apologized a lot (I think for several days). We used this as a teachable moment and he actually became aware of his own bias and worked to get over it.

    Just saying education is not always the fix all. Some people need to take responsibility for their bias and work towards a more diverse workforce.

    1. Re:My take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe he didn't expect "one of you programmers" to fix a network problem.

  72. My 2 cents ( I'm European == are Euro cents ) by vikingpower · · Score: 1

    I have slightly over 21 years of experience in this business now. Programmer, SW architect. Aerospace industry, logistics, small businesses. You name it. And in all these years, I encountered exactly one black person. He consulted with Red Bull, here in Austria. And - besides being impressively knowledgeable on network infrastructure - he was American. The only black person among the numerous Americans I met and worked with in this field. Yes - there were Asians. I trained a couple of highly gifted Senegalese. South Americans ? Nope - exact for the seemingly gifted girl I, enrolled in an MA with an unknown Brasilian university, I helped this week with her MA thesis by letting her interview me. That was the first time I professionally met a South American in 21 years. We have a long way to go.

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    1. Re:My 2 cents ( I'm European == are Euro cents ) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, uh, you're saying that you've only met one black person in a work setting in Austria, and this means there's a diversity problem in the tech industry?

      How many black people - or people from south America - do you meet outside work, just walking down the street in Vienna? I'm Czech and apart from one black guy I work with I see maybe one or two black people a month. Jesus Christ man, you're in central Europe - and let's face it, neither your country nor mine is anyone's first choice when they're looking to move halfway across the world for work.

    2. Re:My 2 cents ( I'm European == are Euro cents ) by vikingpower · · Score: 1

      I omitted to mention that I worked in the Netherlands, in France, in Italy and in the USA. At least a year in each.

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
  73. The Secretary will disavow you? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    What a techie is supposed to look like? You mean the sort of thing that might be influenced by pop culture?

    A particularly prominent "high tech" espionage show comes to mind.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  74. I Am A Sucker... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is eye color in tech representative of the population as a whole? Come on.

    For beautiful eyes!

  75. racism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I taught electronics.
    I had a class with two blacks, one of which skipped a lot.
    The one who came to class regularly asked me for help, so I told him to read more, try to do the problems, THEN ask for help on the parts he had trouble with.
    4 weeks into the class, the one who asked for help was doing OK, no real problems.
    The one who skipped was flunking.
    He made a remark that I was flunking him because of his color.
    The one who was passing looked over and told him that "You stupid 'N&&%%R, if you study it IS easy!".
    Peer pressure worked. Both passed.
    I did have to tell one class that electrons do not care what color the wire is, only that it conducts.
    Also that the same learning has to be done by anyone to do electronics.

    So the problem is not just cultural effects, but the personal willingness to try, work at it, learn, practice, and THINK!
    That this applies to all fields ( arts, sports, music, writing included ) of endeavor is lost on most people.

    That these qualities apply to any field where the person becomes an expert, and is expected to perform at
    any level above average ( medicine, engineering, technology, science ) is a fact.

    Most people will be average at anything, but to succeed each one still has to do the work.

  76. Listen to your teachers, mentors, and peers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's a few tips. Don't follow the "cool" crowd. Get in early and make a good impression on your teachers, peers, and mentors. I sent my first e-mail in 1993 and my sister and I spent $2800 on a Gateway 486 DX2 with 8MB of RAM. Whereas all around our Bronx neighborhood crackheads with sucking on pipes, and b-boys were hooking up their cars with $4000 sound systems. Most of my mentors groomed me to help them with their repair and consulting businesses. Hang out with people who are smarter than you and realize how much more there is for you to learn. Have a good internal compass and good social skills. I know a lot of really smart assholes. I know how to tolerate them and *keep* learning. Stop blaming the white man. Save your money for things that really matter. A $600 iPhone buys a lot of used Linux and Unix books on Craigslist. Talk up people at the data center. Even the people who take out the trash and run the freight elevators. One week after moving into a new colo, my next door neighbor was borrowing couplers and tools, and four weeks later, he remembers my first name. Some of the cleaning staff might not know Cisco from Juniper, but if tell them to look for green or blue boxes in the trash, I will make it worth their while. When my admin rights on the Ciscos got taken away, I cranked on my Cisco lab at home. It's winter, I don't mind the warmth. Finally, dark skinned people, please stop pulling each other down. I speak Spanish and English in clearly enunciated words and come off as really friendly. I am not gay, not a cop, not an informant. If I see a drunk man in the middle of 145th Street and Amsterdam and I bring it to the attention of the two idle cops on 144th Street, please keep your bullshit "snitch" attitude to yourselves. Grow the f*ck up. I might be the guy sitting across the table when your son or daughter is looking for a job.

  77. H1B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fully half the workforce at my last several positions has been non-white, foreign nationals. Making this about race is absurd when that's the reality we all know to be true.

  78. Re:Maybe people would hire you if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could've easily done 8 hours, starting at 8 AM. Not everyone is a silly workaholic.

  79. What is "Diversity," Though? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    Someone else put it best, on an earlier article about racial crap:

    "which group is more diverse: 20 people of all races and genders who grew up in the same town, or 20 white guys who grew up all over the world?"

    Maybe if we didn't focus so much on race when we talk about "diversity," race would cease to be such a major issue for society.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  80. Your ignorance will be your undoing. by s.petry · · Score: 1

    The problem in reality is that people in the top 1% (really more like the top .01%) income brackets want us to be pitted against each other. They pay good money to generate propaganda, pay people like Sharpten to spread hate, pay agent provocateurs to infiltrate groups they see as a risk to their propaganda campaigns. The fact that you can't see this is not surprising or uncommon. But your blame is in the exact wrong place.

    Sadly there are plenty of people that buy into the lie and do what Sharpten does for free, because they can't see beyond the messenger. Listen to black community members like Professor Griff, or if you prefer history listen to MLK and MalcomX. They will all tell you the shape of the world. People need to stop believing everything they are told and actually "look" at the world to see it..

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  81. Forum by simm_s · · Score: 1

    This is like the worst forum for this stuff. Half of the respondents are like there is no problem and the other half is like black people suck. Any black people reading this would say why would I want to be part of this community. I actually kind of think this is click-bait for white people rather than any interest in social issues.

  82. Re:Removing /. from my bookmarks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You nailed it. I don't know what's changed over the past few years but this site seems to be run by SJWs now.

    Don't let the door hit you on the way out, friend.

  83. Doing my part by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

    My sons Black (Adopted) and is getting his first computer in a few days for his 7th birthday. It's got Kubuntu, the Steam client for some games, and he's already learning some that will teach him about functions. He absolutely loves computers and is already running circles around Mama.

    Tech billionaire in the making!

  84. Leigh Alexander on /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is Leigh Alexander working for SlashDot too, because I just turned AdBlock on again, just in case.

  85. A solution to the pipeline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simply tax all H1B's 20% per year, and use this money to fund technical scholarships. This makes H1B more expensive than native born, and helps fill the pipeline.

  86. It's still the pipeline, the number seems to say. by Meeni · · Score: 1

    According to the very article that says it is not the pipeline, avg black component in IT master graduates is 3.5%, the workforce is around 3%. Looks normal to me, at the workforce level, that is. The result indicates a completely disproportionate number of white males in IT university curiculums, and that's the problem that needs addressed. Before minorities can have a chance to compete on the good jobs, they need to have a chance to get the degrees for such jobs.

  87. What is racism...really???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was coming up (30 years ago), people would ask me if I played basketball ( i was 6' 3" in the 11th grade ) and were surprised when I said no. White and Black.
    It's not bad, but it is prejudice, racial prejudice. So it's racism right? I mean, really, take the bad connotations away and just go by the literal definition and that is racism.

    So if the Asian or Indian guy comes into an interview and looks like the stereotypical indian or asian guy, are you more or less likely to believe that he or she can code?

    Now, if a black guy, especially one who is obviously culturally black comes into an interview, is it not just a little more likely that they are going to be seen as slightly less technical than an asian guy with the same credentials and experience. Not vastly less, just a little less, 1% or so.

    And if you catch even a whiff of attitude from the asian guy are you likely to think they are an angry person or that you asked the wrong question or caught them on the wrong day. Now how about that black guy? Was it you? or did you just catch that he is one of the angry ones? If a woman responds a little sharply to one of your questions is it you? Or is she one of those bitchy ones? If it were a guy like you, is he a bitch? Or just assertive?

    Everyone assumes that racial or gender bias in tech is necessarily about people seeing women or blacks or hispanics as being too stupid to code or just hating them too much to hire them. The problem is more insidious than that. It usually presents as a slightly higher scepticism about our abilities and a slightly higher sensitivity to our personality quirks. And that can make all the difference in getting hired. Especially at a top technical firm. People at those companies claim that they can just "recognize" a good hire when they see one. Perhaps it is a self-fulfilling prophecy.

      I once had a boss complain that I was so even handed with our client base, that he wondered if I even had feelings. Then the one first time I got slightly testy with someone on the phone ( they kept calling and asking for my predecessor; 3 times in one day ), I had to go to sensitivity training.

    I have never had a problem finding and keeping a technical job, but you can't tell my race from resume (until recently, perhaps) and I dress like a banker at work. Not just on interviews, always. No flashy suits, no overly stylish or fashion-forward shoes. Just what I was taught was appropriate 20 years ago at my first real job: Arthur Andersen.

    Now the other side of what some of you are saying is true. There is a price that I pay for fitting in at work; I don't fit in in my community. The way I dress, talk and carry myself. My slowness to show anger. My unwillingness to get loud in public makes me seem weak to many that I grew up with. Many aren't willing to make that choice. And the choice isn't as simple as you might think.

  88. Re:"collecting the check" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Schools need bodies to fill out classes or those classes don't happen. They can't afford to filter or discourage paying customers because the failures help pay for the good students.

    I've been a student and paid adjunct at a community college. The following may be controversial but IDGAF. Black men (unless they were raised by the classic strong take-zero-shit Black family or Strong Black Woman) are frequently indifferent students.

    Black women often make excellent students. I guess they know it's "sink or swim" but I am impressed at the level of dedication I saw. Black female interest in STEM could be developed since many are career-oriented.

    Inb4 "nerd with jungle fever" as I could care less about interacting with Blacks outside business. I give everyone a fair shot and they got what they earned.

  89. Are Emily and Greg More Employable than Lakisha... by nbauman · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's one:

    Are Emily and Greg More Employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination (NBER Working Paper No. 9873).

    Studies like that have been done repeatedly for decades. I expect that if you read the NBER study, they'd have a bibliography of older research.

    Each one repeatedly demonstrates actual discrimination against blacks in hiring. I don't know how anyone could avoid that conclusion. Employers are more likely to hire a person with a white name than a person with a black name with the identical resume. It's not just socioeconomic disadvantage, inability to do the job, lack of qualifications or laziness.

    I don't know if anyone has done a similar study in tech fields specifically, but it would be a good thing to do. If you're taking a black studies course, you could get a good paper out of it. Send out 100 resumes to Monster.com from Greg and 100 resumes from Jamal.

    If you want to know generally why there are so few minorities in science, Science magazine has had many articles.

    http://www.chicagobooth.edu/ca...

    http://www.nber.org/digest/sep...

    Are Emily and Greg More Employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination (NBER Working Paper No. 9873).

    Employers' Replies to Racial Names

    "Job applicants with white names needed to send about 10 resumes to get one callback; those with African-American names needed to send around 15 resumes to get one callback."

    Now a "field experiment" by NBER Faculty Research Fellows Marianne Bertrand and Sendhil Mullainathan measures this discrimination in a novel way. In response to help-wanted ads in Chicago and Boston newspapers, they sent resumes with either African-American- or white-sounding names and then measured the number of callbacks each resume received for interviews. Thus, they experimentally manipulated perception of race via the name on the resume. Half of the applicants were assigned African-American names that are "remarkably common" in the black population, the other half white sounding names, such as Emily Walsh or Greg Baker.

    To see how the credentials of job applicants affect discrimination, the authors varied the quality of the resumes they used in response to a given ad. Higher quality applicants were given a little more labor market experience on average and fewer holes in their employment history. They were also portrayed as more likely to have an email address, to have completed some certification degree, to possess foreign language skills, or to have been awarded some honors.

    In total, the authors responded to more than 1,300 employment ads in the sales, administrative support, clerical, and customer services job categories, sending out nearly 5,000 resumes. The ads covered a large spectrum of job quality, from cashier work at retail establishments and clerical work in a mailroom to office and sales management positions.

    Here's more:

    http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/200...

    Study: Black man and white felon – same chances for hire

    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12...

    In Job Hunt, College Degree Can’t Close Racial Gap

    "A more recent study, published this year in The Journal of Labor Economics found white, Asian and Hispanic managers tended to hire more whites and fewer blacks than black managers did."

    "There is also the matter of how many jobs, especially higher-level ones, are never even posted and depend on word-of-mouth and informal networks, in many cases leaving blacks at a disadvantage. A recent study published in the academic journal Social Problems found that white males receive substantially more job leads for high-level supervisory positions than women and members of minorities."

  90. Lol, Troll Article by Cammi · · Score: 1

    There are more than 2 races on this planet ...

  91. Why are Asians always ignored in this discussion? by ted_the_canuck · · Score: 1

    There is, to a certain degree, a culture of wanting children to do well. Saving for their child's education and working with them on school work probably contributes to success. Of course not everyone does well, but at least many motivated people get their chance.

    --
    ==
  92. I read that as ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... pros in "Black IT" think there should be more diversity.
    Who would have thought that the bad guys were so politically correct?

  93. Re:Are Emily and Greg More Employable than Lakisha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  94. Maybe in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sitting in a room here at a large Teleco in New Zealand with half a dozen people who would not be considered "white". There are an additional 3 people who could be considered "white".

    As for "African American", we don't generally have many here in the local population, so it's unsurprising that we don't have any in our workforce.

  95. So the fix is simple, right? by tlambert · · Score: 2

    So the fix is simple, right?

    Pick the right names for your kids; problem solved.

    1. Re:So the fix is simple, right? by Locando · · Score: 1

      And if you have lived with a "wrong" name throughout your childhood and adolescence, you should have to pay for your parents' decision why? I mean, if we're talking about what people ought to do, why not say that white hiring managers should be less discriminatory, rather than constraining people's arbitrary choices?

    2. Re:So the fix is simple, right? by tlambert · · Score: 1

      And if you have lived with a "wrong" name throughout your childhood and adolescence, you should have to pay for your parents' decision why?

      Should you? No. Do children have to pay for their parents poor decisions anyway? Yes, all the damn time.

      From fetal alcohol syndrome, to asthma and other health problems from second hand smoke, to childhood obesity, to living one block into the wrong zoning area resulting in a bad school district vs. a good one, to a lack of delayed gratification causing privation due to larger than sustainable family size.

      So yes: all the damn time. Children pay for poor parental decisions.

      I mean, if we're talking about what people ought to do, why not say that white hiring managers should be less discriminatory, rather than constraining people's arbitrary choices?

      Because this conversation has already given up on that idea by declaring discrimination *so* completely systemic that having the wrong name is enough to prevent you getting 50% of normal callbacks on job applications. The reductio ad absurdum of that position is that you change your name, or get yourself the right nickname, and your job prospects will improve.

      Because, you know, we are all, after all, defined by our jobs and the amount of money we do or don't make.

    3. Re:So the fix is simple, right? by Locando · · Score: 1

      And if you have lived with a "wrong" name throughout your childhood and adolescence, you should have to pay for your parents' decision why?

      Should you? No. (snip)

      Great! You understand then! Of course I know about the other stuff you listed which was totally irrelevant to my initial point. Biology is hard to change, arbitrary social forces less so!

      I mean, if we're talking about what people ought to do, why not say that white hiring managers should be less discriminatory, rather than constraining people's arbitrary choices?

      Because this conversation has already given up on that idea by declaring discrimination *so* completely systemic that having the wrong name is enough to prevent you getting 50% of normal callbacks on job applications. The reductio ad absurdum of that position is that you change your name, or get yourself the right nickname, and your job prospects will improve.

      Because, you know, we are all, after all, defined by our jobs and the amount of money we do or don't make.

      Who's giving up? I'm not giving up. Why are you giving up?

      Wait, you're not actually sarcastically agreeing with me, are you?

    4. Re:So the fix is simple, right? by tlambert · · Score: 1

      And if you have lived with a "wrong" name throughout your childhood and adolescence, you should have to pay for your parents' decision why?

      Should you? No. (snip)

      Great! You understand then! Of course I know about the other stuff you listed which was totally irrelevant to my initial point. Biology is hard to change, arbitrary social forces less so!

      Only if by "biology is hard to change" you are referring to the biological fact of who your parents are, rather than race. I agree that you can't pick your relatives, but I don't see that as being meaningful to the discussion.

      The study was over sending out resumes with various names on them, and the likelihood of a callback for an interview. It had nothing to do with actual race, and to the extent that it had anything to do with race, rather than economic class at all, then it was about "*perceived* race of a given name".

      NB: Others have made cogent arguments that the names selected gave economic and social class indicators, and that it was in fact a class bias rather than a race bias, and that the white male would have been just as discriminated against had the name they used for that subject been, for example, "Jethro Bodine" instead.

      If your perceived race based on your name is a problem - *change it!*, and by doing so, change that perception. Once you have the call back, it's too late for them to be racist in that part of the hiring process.

  96. Same there by nicoleb_x · · Score: 1

    I can't think of too many qualified black candidates that I interviewed and then didn't hire. I'd have to say that percentage wise, people from Ohio (no idea) and India have the lowest success rate with me.

  97. Re:Are Emily and Greg More Employable than Lakisha by CaptainPinko · · Score: 2

    The name one I found dubious since they chose middle-class white names and lower-class black names. It's not like they chose Billy-Ray Luellen-Mae. I suspect that a lot of "racism" in the US is actually classism where being black correlates being lower-class, and so it forms the assumption "black means lower-class unless proven otherwise". This would explain why people forget that Colin Powell was black and other successfully black men. "Black", I posit, is a hybrid race/class construct. --- Annecdote: I met a black African girl from Tanzania who **hated** African American names and African Americans and had nothing good to say about them. That was the moment that really made me realised is that it is not actually about race-itself. Personally, I notice myself much more comfortable dealing with Africans than African Americans as cab drivers, much friendlier, jovial, positive, and animated.

    --
    Your CPU is not doing anything else, at least do something.
  98. Re:Are Emily and Greg More Employable than Lakisha by CaptainPinko · · Score: 1

    In case it wasn't clear, my point is that when we talk about race there are many confounding factors such as culture and socio-economic class and its hard to figure out what the actual underlying issues... and if you could its probably complicated.

    --
    Your CPU is not doing anything else, at least do something.
  99. And out comes the racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tons of racism in these comments, but no, no racism in the tech world, no siree!

  100. Niggers have no place in tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They belong on a noose swinging from a tree.

  101. The problem isn't racism in tech by Lord+Kano · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A couple of years ago, I met the guys from thedailywtf.com and as the only black guy at the table, I was asked my opinion on what should be done to get more "diversity" in technology. My answer was "Nothing. The last thing we need is to have more people getting into this field if they don't have a love of it."

    There are two problems, as I see it.

    First, there is the racism that exists in western society.
    Second, there is the anti-intellectual facet to some parts of African American culture.

    Racism is complex. It takes many forms, on one hand you have the outwardly hostile racist who just plain doesn't like people of #Race and then you have what Michael Gerson dubbed "the soft bigotry of low expectations". That is manifest where many people, who think they're progressive, automatically assume that a black person is less skilled than his white or asian counterpart. I have a very Anglicized name. It's not Demetrialis or some other ridiculous nonsense like that. When people get emails from me and speak to me on the telephone, they almost never assume that I'm black.

    Occasionally, when I meet someone who has only seen my resumè or spoken to me of the phone, I can see the surprise in their face when instead of a skinny white guy, they find a 6'2" 250 pound black dude.

    In September, there was a teacher strike at the local district and I addressed the school board. You wouldn't believe how many left-handed compliments I received about "how well spoken" I am.

    The anti-intellectualism present in African American culture is extremely destructive. I have experienced it. In large parts of the US, any black kid who is smart, who achieves academically, who has college and career aspirations is derided as acting white. I have been accused of "thinking that[I'm} white". Fortunately, I had strong parents who gave me a much different message at home and reinforced it constantly.

    I traveled in different circles, I had many groups of friends, all of them distinct. Of the core group of black guys with whom I hung out when we were growing up, two of us have never been to prison; three have and one is still there. Of the white guys who were my friends, none of them have been to prison.

    We all grew up in the same area. At most, five miles separated all of the various neighborhoods. There's a reason why there's such a high rate of incarceration among the black guys. There's a reason why most of the white guys went to college. We were all middle-class. None of us had particularly wealthy parents. The white guys usually heard the message that education or training was important. It was necessary to go out there and be the best person you can be. A lot of the black guys, not all and certainly not most but a lot, were primarily concerned with getting money and bitches. Fast money and lots of bitches.

    These things have consequences that last far beyond childhood.

    I have a M.S. degree and I work a good job in tech. I'm the only black guy in my department. I was the only black guy in my last department and the one before that(I replaced the previous only black guy when he went back to school for his Doctorate) and the one before that and the one before that. It's not the industry's fault. It's mostly not the fault of racism. It's mostly the fault of a society, subculture and families that don't impress upon young black people, the value of education.

    I love tech. I love the people. I love spending my entire day surrounded by geeks.

    I find far more camaraderie in that than I do among people who share none of my interests or life experiences beyond being black.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    1. Re:The problem isn't racism in tech by x_t0ken_407 · · Score: 1

      As a fellow black man in this industry, I could not have said it better myself. I'm just mad that I didn't come across this article until today (having a painful time catching up on my RSS feed, haha). But yes, you've hit the nail on the head of so many points that I was going to raise myself in a separate post, thanks for saving me the time. Namely, people who've only spoken to me on the phone or seen my resume, being surprised when they find that I'm black. Also, the point about anti-intellectualism in our community, being accused of "acting white", etc. The point about it not being the industry's fault, etc. I've actually not come across racism keeping me from a promotion or from a job offer, and I live in the South (FL). I've only ever seen hiring managers want the most intelligent and capable person for the job, which is usually myself. Skin color has never been an issue for me. All excellent points that I was going to hit on.

  102. Neil deGrasse Tyson HAS said something about race by Valacosa · · Score: 1

    What does Neil deGrasse Tyson have to say about racial diversity in astrophysics? That's right, nothing, so who fucking cares??

    False. Neil deGrasse Tyson has an amazing story which is exactly about diversity in astrophysics. You can watch it for yourself here.

    Factchecking is for winners.

    --
    "Live as if you'll die tomorrow." Ridiculous. You could die later today.
  103. Re:Are Emily and Greg More Employable than Lakisha by nbauman · · Score: 1

    Good point, They thought of that. Their answer is no.

    http://www.nber.org/papers/w98...

    In Section 5, we discuss possible interpretations of our results, focusing especially on two issues. First, we examine whether the race-specic names we have chosen might also proxy for social class above and beyond the race of the applicant. Using birth certicates data on mother’s education for the dierent names used in our sample, we nd little relationship between social background and the name specic callback rates.

    Also see Table 11.

  104. More about gansta culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Black culture seems to celebrate a lack of intelligence. Not at all racist, it's akin to pretty white girls not wanting to be smart

  105. Two RUNNERS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine 2 running tracks, each 200 yards long but at geographically separated locations not visible to each other.

    At the end of each track there is a television camera to broadcast the winner, but other than that, no cameras at any other
    point on the track...

    At each track, there is one runner... one white runner and one black runner. The track with the white runner we will refer to
    as the white track, the track with the black runner we will refer to as the black track.

    To start each race, a whistle audible to both runners will sound.

    Racism:

    Even though we take it as fact that each track is 200 yards long, the black track has a number of 10 ft obstacles that the
    white track doesn't have.

    The whistle sounds, the race begins, and fairly consistently the white runner crosses the finish line first.

    Sometimes, in some races it is true that some black runners running on the black track cross the finish line first, but everyone
    on the black track does so after scaling the 10 ft obstables, and realistically and statistically those obstacles stop a lot of
    runners.

    From the white runners' perspectives, they've never seen the black track, and they've never seen the 10ft obstacles. They've
    only seen the white track which has no obstacles. They simply assume that because the tracks are the same length that
    they are in fact the same. When the black runners complain about the obstacles on the black track, the white runners
    discount them because in fact some black runners have still run and won races.

    From the black runners' perspectives however, they know that the white runners don't have to confront obstacles on their
    track so there is a feeling of unfairness that they carry around like luggage.

    On top of that, it doesn't help that the white runners discount and evade discussion of this unfairness, often choosing to find fault with
    the black runners themselves. This usually only serves to add indignation to the feelings felt by the black runners.

    This is what black people refer to as 'white privilege'.

    When the white runners hear this, they express outrage because as individuals, they actually did RUN their track. Nobody
    ran their race for them... moreover, they won and nobody likes to lose...

    For this reason, I prefer to use the term 'white sabotage', because the black track has been sabotaged in such a way that
    it makes it harder for black runners to win.

    These obstacles are erected all over our society. Many in our society bristle over the idea of Affirmative Action assisting
    minorities, pretending that such programs seek to elevate mediocrity over merit... but those same people often conveniently
    ignore that such programs primarily benefit white women whose merit is rarely questioned relative to people of color seeking
    to benefit from the same programs. Such stigmatization or lack of it for white women colors sentiments and erects
    obstacles.

    Most people in the world who are killed are killed by people that look just like them, whether it be whites killing whites, arabs
    killing arabs, asians killing asians, or blacks killing blacks... yet despite school shootings, serial killers, and plain old
    fashioned murders committed by whites against other whites, you'll never hear the phrase "white on white crime" or
    "white people killing their own" despite the fact that they do. Instead to stigmatize black people, we fault the black runner
    vs the unfairness he must confront on a daily basis. "Black on black crime" holds black people back-- at least according to Bill O'reilly.

    "You have a victim mentality... how dare you question and/or complain about the unfairness you are forced to confront
    everyday despite living in a country that declared its independence with the words: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of H

  106. How racist of you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aren't you over this charade that the every white person on the planet is a racist and that everyone and society as a whole is against you? Can you stop victimizing yourselves now?

    Howzat read - "Shaddup, nigger, there ain't no such thing as racism"?

    After all, that effectively is what you're saying.

  107. And other industries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And there is diversity in NBA players? Oh never mind.

  108. mostly black immigrants by ogunsiron · · Score: 1

    It's funny how most of the well known and esteemed black technies that I know of are of recent immigrant background and how most of them are very, very much black. One would think that the "racist" White, Asian and Indian cabal that's doing all it can to keep the black man out of IT would hate african blacks even more than they hate african-american blacks, right ? I think I get it though. What we have here is the evil, racist Whites, Asians and Indians using divide and conquer, for sure. Also, the Whites, Asians and Indians work with Nigerians/etc but keep the African-Americans out because they're *know* that AAs so much more qualified than they are and that the Nigerians are not a threat, you see. Surely that must be why Nigerians and other immigrants are the only black face in IT. It has nothing to do with their own talents and abilities. It's all about the Whites, Asians and Indians scheming to keep the brother down!

  109. Simple reason for this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    H-1Bs won't hire blacks. They're all Indians, and they are massively prejudiced against women and blacks. Simple as that.

  110. Waiting for the story.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    White players (LACK OF) in professional football and basketball.

    White professors (LACK OF) in many university engineering departments.

    White students (LACK OF) in the multicultural student union.

                (and yes, I have tried, but mean looks I get tell me to leave and never come back.)

    Oh I know!!-----
    White people (LACK OF) in Nigeria. HAH

    Why would we see stories like these? The lack of white people in ANY situation is culturally acceptable.

  111. The obvious answer is obvious by Methadras · · Score: 1

    And people seem to be trying to avoid it. There aren't that many blacks interested in IT/Coding work and that ones that are, are drowned out and washed away in a see of other diversity hires namely from Asia and India. This isn't about racism, but a matter of sheer numbers. Blacks simply do not have them.

  112. Re:Why are Asians always ignored in this discussio by jwhitener · · Score: 1

    I can think of several major social structure differences between the history of black Americans and asian Americans. I just wrote half a book explaining it. Then deleted it. If you are curious you can figure it out yourself.

  113. Higher social class = Unethical behavior by NewYork · · Score: 1

    http://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1118373109

  114. Replace Caste with Race in by NewYork · · Score: 1

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caste_politics_in_India

  115. Re:Are Emily and Greg More Employable than Lakisha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Correlation does not imply causality. A name tells something about social class, not about skin colour, even though there is a correlation. A light-skinned woman called Lakisha would be equally disadvantaged against a dark-skinned woman named Emily as the other way around.

  116. Initiative by MakersDirector · · Score: 0

    Let's be honest.

    Not only are there not many black coders. There's not many females. And there aren't that many people from arab nations.

    Now I don't see a problem with this. What's with this obsession with trying to get everyone to think the same way and even distribution across genders for everything?

    Now let's draw the lines on where this leads: Not just homogenization: But a race that looks, functions, and feels the exact same.

    Are you buying on to the concept that we should be part of a production line based on form by homogenization of mind?

    My point is: Black people, at least the ones I have met - think and act differently. In my opinion, they tend to make for good entertainers, actors, and YES I have met a FEW decnet coders, but by and large, they have other things they excel at different than white.

    This is NOT to be mistaken for capacity to achieve. I can learn Dutch if I wanted to. but the truth is. I dont want to. I KNOW it changes the way i see the world, the way i feel about myself, and more. NOW SHOULD I find value in learning Dutch one of these days. I MAY make that choice.

    But to cite 'imbalance' rhetoric based on statistical bias - is misleading by numbers.

    These numbers and this information fails to recognize nor respect the individual experience and the mindset of the individuals that comprise that group.

    Let them make the decisons for themselves. Quit trying to melt it all together, Yes, this is the melting pot, but you've taken it too far.

  117. True Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cudos Nerval's Lobster - a genuine Troll

  118. Bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's 2% of tech, not 2% of college students total.