Slashdot Mirror


Fraudulent Apps Found In Apple's Store

snydeq writes Angry support queries citing problems with mystery iOS apps has led InfoWorld's Simon Phipps to discover the existence of several scamware apps in Apple's App Store. "If you're a scammer looking to make a fast buck, it appears that [Apple's App Store] process can be defeated," Phipps reports. "The questions originated from a support link for a $2.99 app in Apple's iTunes Store," which pointed angry customers to the Apache OpenOffice community, which doesn't even have an iOS app. The app in question, Quickoffice Pro, "simply displays a gray screen with the word Tap. When you tap the screen, the app exits." Further investigation has uncovered two other scam apps thus far.

25 of 89 comments (clear)

  1. Clearly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    You're tapping it wrong.

  2. This is news.... because? by bhlowe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    2 lameware apps out of 1.2 million apps? I'm guessing people will get over it.

    1. Re:This is news.... because? by amber_of_luxor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The issue is that Apple claims that each app is vetted for potential security issues. By most definitions of the term, "fraud" falls under the category "security issue". Consequently, the discovery of even one fraud app means that Apple is not vetting apps in a manner consistent with what they claim.

      --
      Wind Beneath Thy Wings
  3. Re:Security? by kesuki · · Score: 2

    on the road to being a 700 billion dollar company a few walls had to be torn down....

  4. Walled Garden = Stewardship by EndlessNameless · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is where Apple can provide value to their customers by managing the ecosystem.

    They should be more than capable of issuing refunds to anyone who was scammed, remotely nuking the app, and punishing the publisher in an appropriate manner.

    If they do all of those things, it justifies some of their policies, at least for mainstream users.

    --

    ---
    According to the latest ruleset, this post should be modded as Vorpal Flamebait +5.
    1. Re:Walled Garden = Stewardship by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 2

      Android also currently has issues with malware that haven't cropped up inside the walled garden.

      Walled gardens are appropriate for appliance-based computing. If you want a more open platform, you need to do a lot more footwork yourself. Android is a great platform for such users.

    2. Re:Walled Garden = Stewardship by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 2

      2/1.2Mil seems like a pretty good ratio to me; if I had that sort of a blip on the surface of a road I was driving on, it would be completely unnoticeable. The important thing is how they deal with the blip -- if they respond quickly and add new logic to protect against this kind of system gaming, it's all good. If they go on a media blitz showering us with unicorns, it's time to quickly scale the garden wall.

  5. Hmmm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "A developer that we hired as a freelance third party vendor published this app under my personal Apple developer account without permission or my knowledge. I take app fraud very seriously and will have the app removed as soon as possible."

    Surely he would have noticed sales from this app appearing in his account. So where does the money go ?
    I smell something bovine.

  6. It does what? by SeaFox · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How does an app with no functionality get through the approval process to start with? This isn't a case of the app having a secret feature of calling home or installing malware. I mean, if it doesn't do anything how could anyone have reviewed the app to begin with?

    1. Re:It does what? by Tom · · Score: 2

      How does an app with no functionality get through the approval process to start with?

      Because no process is flawless. 3 out of 1.2 mio. Heck, in a lot of touristic areas, the percentage of brick-and-mortar stores that are scams is higher.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    2. Re:It does what? by jones_supa · · Score: 2

      I can think of some theories.

      1) The reviewer did a mistake. Maybe he was reviewing multiple applications and from the bunch one slipped to the store even if it was not yet reviewed properly.
      2) The reviewer was sloppy and did not do his job carefully and ethically.
      3) There was some technical problem.
      4) Some attacker got into the system and messed with things.

  7. Maybe it's art by Marginal+Coward · · Score: 2

    ...and if so, it's cheap at just $2.99. Heck, how many times have you paid more than that to go through an art gallery, only to find the inevitable "Painting with Single Dot in the Middle"? Better yet, this art is both multimedia and interactive.

  8. Re:For the Love of Cock! by seoras · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's getting boring here on Slashdot, this shift from Microsoft bashing to Apple bashing.
    The article's making it to front page are becoming very one sided, pro-Google/Android and anti-Apple.

    Only several out of a million+ Apps?
    So a few wild animals jump over into the walled garden, easy enough to chase them out and plug that hole.

  9. Schadenfreude much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wasn't stuff like this supposed to be prevented by having a walled garden?

    Dude, people have also breached the walls, so to speak, at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, A.K.A. the WHITE HOUSE.

    Calm down, they'll take care of it. If security in the iOS App Store were perfect, that would be quite a feat. Being tighter than the security at the WHITE HOUSE ought to make most people happy.

    It's like you wouldn't be impressed with what Bishop did with that knife in Aliens because he managed to knick his finger doing something he apparently does quite a bit and normally DOESN'T MISS. Misses so infrequently that it drew the comment from one of the Space Marines, "I thought you never missed, Bishop!"

    As I understand it, a week with a revealed breach in iOS App Store security, (etc., ) is like a week WITHOUT one in Android land. Pretty rare, and noteworthy. Hence why you were able to read this story. It's a rare enough event that it made the news.

  10. Re: By definition, not a scam by xaotikdesigns · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It opens, you tap it, and it closes. You can't get much quicker than that. What's the issue?

    --
    XDInd
  11. Quickoffice Pro Is not a "scam app" by Saysys · · Score: 4, Informative

    Quickoffice Pro is a useful program i've been using since I purchased an iPhone 3G. It recently had a bad update that broke it, a mistake on the publisher's part no doubt, but not a scam. Honestly this article reads way to joyously consists of way too little research on the subject.

    It's like some people want IOS to suck in the same ways Android does; sorry folks! It sucks in it's own ways.

    1. Re:Quickoffice Pro Is not a "scam app" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you had even went as far as reading the summary, you would have seen that these apps are not the actual quickoffice owned by google (and since discontinued), but scam apps designed to get people to pay for them but do not deliver the advertised functionality. They are blatant ripoffs, down to stealing google's logo and including bogus support links to avoid attention.

  12. Re:Security? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Nobody of any intellectual merit uses iDevices

    That's the dumbest fucking thing I've read today.

  13. Re:Security? by v1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    not prevented, just greatly reduced.

    Though even just looking at raw numbers isn't even fair. Apppl's store inventory dwarfs all of the others, and still numerically has fewer scams. It ought to work the other way around unless the wall is performing very effectively.

    But bottom line here is some reviewers just got fired, and those that remain were harshly threatened. Reminds me of the recent peer reviewed journals that got caught with some lazy reviewers rubber stamping to boost their productivity numbers.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  14. Re:I'm confused... by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 2

    Phone apps I actually use:
    Alarm Clock
    Countdown Timer
    Stop Watch
    Calculator
    eBook reader
    email reader
    text messaging app
    Music player
    Video player
    Calendar
    Photo viewer
    Offline Map-based GPS
    Microphone/annotation device
    Reminder/To-Do app
    Address Book
    Input device for computer
    Remote Access/monitoring software for computers
    Weather app
    Camera
    Offline Reference apps (health/meds/astronomy/formulas/conversions/knots/words)
    Collaborative doodle apps
    Music composition/performance apps

    That's what I actually use on a regular basis. Interestingly, a large portion of those are provided by default.
    Another one that I always intend to use but never actually find useful is a range finder app that lets you calculate distance/height of objects.

  15. Abandoned apps are worse by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As the versions of iOS increase, many of the apps that I purchased don't even work anymore and are still on the app store.
    Perhaps the developer just forgot about them, or couldn't be bothered spending the time or money to update them to more current iOS versions.
    It seems that there are a lot of abandoned apps out there.

    --
    READY.
    PRINT ""+-0
  16. Re:For the Love of Cock! by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 3, Funny

    I love the Tim Cook reference.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  17. Re:For the Love of Cock! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Pretty much. /. died after taco left.

  18. Re:For the Love of Cock! by dimeglio · · Score: 2

    I think you proved his point.

    --
    Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
  19. You can ask money back by ruir · · Score: 2

    Let me reiterate...this article is a troll. You can go the iTunes app, and ask for your money back in the first 14 days, if memory does not fail me, and Apple will give it back, no questions asked. I lost count of the Apps I returned. As far as I remember your payments to the author of the app are only transferred after 30 days, or something like that.