Slashdot Mirror
How the NSA Is Spying On Everyone: More Revelations
The Intercept has published today a story detailing documents that "reveal how the NSA plans to secretly introduce new flaws into communication systems so that they can be tapped into—a controversial tactic that security experts say could be exposing the general population to criminal hackers." The documents also describe a years-long effort, aimed at hostile and friendly regimes, from the point of view of the U.S. government, to break the security of various countries' communications networks.
"Codenamed AURORAGOLD, the covert operation has monitored the content of messages sent and received by more than 1,200 email accounts associated with major cellphone network operators, intercepting confidential company planning papers that help the NSA hack into phone networks."
Is anyone surprised?
Good thing we're all friends, right? Anybody else would have to see this as an act of war.
... security experts say could be exposing the general population to criminal hackers.
I don't get it. The NSA is an organization of criminal hackers, and it's not a question of "could be", the NSA is already doing it. What am I missing?
Don't muddy the waters by implying that only a specific, "bad-apple" division of government is doing the stalking. It is government that is doing the stalking. The specific division of government (NSA) is utterly irrelevant to the victims. That only matters to the aggressor.
If it was a private company doing the stalking, you wouldn't say that "Human Resources" is the aggressor and ignore the fact that Human Resources is owned by, funded by, and works for Google. You would state the obvious and say that Google is the aggressor.
In other words, this is a failure of government, not "the NSA". Government is attacking your basic human right to free association, not "the NSA".
There is a group called SAGE that writes the crypto protocols for cell phones, DECT phones and other ETSI/ITU/3GPP derived standards.
They have never knowingly published an unbroken spec. It is widely understood that this group exists to put government sponsored back doors into cordless phones and cell phones.
I attended a 3GPP meeting since LTE was happening. In it, the guy from SAGE was presenting the new link cipher. 3GPP had asked for something based on AES (so SAGE couldn't pull their A5 shit any more). He presenting AES-CTR for the encryption and AES-CBC-MAC for the integrity field. He added in an off hand way that *the integrity field is truncated to 16 bits*.
Since I wasn't there to help them, I didn't question this in the meeting but after the meeting I cornered him an asked why he made it 16 bits (because its obviously stupid), and he did a Gallic shrug of his shoulders and said "Zat ees what zey asked for". So at that point I knew the fix was in.
I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
you mean like the NSA?
Do the NSA and the American government believe in any way they should be free from other people spying on them? Or have they completely given up and decided "fuck it, everybody is spying anyway"?
Because if the NSA or the US government are ever again going to complain about Chinese hackers, or pretty much any form of computer crime, it's the biggest pile of shit imaginable.
Pretty much America has publicly said "we'll spy on anybody we can", which means you have no right to bitch when others do it you.
Thanks, assholes, for undermining the rights of everyone on the planet.
Lost at C:>. Found at C.
why did you put libertarians in "" and only them?
have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
I'm certain that it's because the current Libertarian Party platform has been hijacked by the Fascist Party and bears little to no resemblance to traditional libertarian values, policies, or ideals.
The Democrats and Republicans, however, have always been under the control of the Fascist Party, so their current actions (ignore the platforms, both parties already do) are consistent with their traditional views. The Greens have no coherent platform and are so inconsequential the Fascists haven't bothered with them.
"Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
Possibly because none of the people running on the Libertarian ticket today hold to the core beliefs and values of Libertarianism?
Glad I'm not in the US!
oh, wait...
If an experiment works, something has gone wrong.
I think you meant to say "will continue to".
Oh, and don't trust your burner phones.
-- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
If you think that NSA would stop at introducing flaws to communication system, think again !
The flaws in the communication system is but one of the ***MANY*** fields that they have tampered with
With the advent of IoT, it would be a fucking field day for spooks from NSA --- nothing, and I repeat, NOTHING in our daily lives will escape the watchful eyeballs of NSA
"—a controversial tactic that security experts say could be exposing the general population to criminal hackers."
Well yeah, the article said it was for the NSA.
How long before the American people wake up to the fact that they are living in a police state ...
I think it is time for an unarmed police force in the United States, and a proper attempt at disarming the population
So, your solution to the US being a police state is to take away guns from the public ?
How long before YOU wake up to the fact that you are an idiot who is incapable of even
simple logical thought ?
not that i disagree per se, but thats pretty much a no true scotsman fallacy no? No party in american politics is 100% to its core. Democrats claim to be for the poor people, yet they keep pushing bills that directly hurt the poor. republicans say they are for limited government, except for military/police, or if you are a woman.
have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
If codenames are supposed to be assigned randomly, then why don't we see some like WEASELVOMIT?
Have gnu, will travel.
republicans say they are for limited government, except for military/police, or if you are a woman.
Or gay, or want to grow certain plants, or want to have a little fun in your life, or...
i wasnt trying to write a book but yeah, pretty much. I can go on and on about each party if you really want me to but i think everyone gets the point
have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
We only publish the names of the failures (and sometimes old, decommissioned systems), so that the public can see that they're really worried about nothing. Wouldn't do to have the little darlings actually know what we know now, would it?
So we really should have been voting for the *fourth* candidate all along?!
Any comment mentioning moderation is automatically Offtopic.
The U.S. government is EXTREMELY corrupt.
Safe to assume they would monitor the exploitable vulnerability and terminate said subject if he was to find it. All to keep it on the down low. Naah that would never happen. I'm just being paranoid here right.
This is nothing new and has been known for decades. I'm finding this "entitlement" generation of hipster douchebags to be quite annoying with their incessant whining.
So I see your starting to notice the paid "opinion shifting" contractors the government has?
First, they store your emails *forever*. And in 25 years their AI algos might be hunting for "traitors" and flag you because you made some noises in 2014.
Ai certainly can read ALL emails.
While you are right on one hand, the issue is more complex than this.
Even in the article itself it talks about how the government is fighting with itself (NIST and the NSA, where NIST's mandate by law is to make sure the government and public are secure and NSA is by law mandated to make sure they are not).
"The government" is a big thing and the left hand doesn't ALWAYS know what the right hand is doing. The problems arise when the right hand can operate with autonomy so that not only does the left not know what it is doing, but it has no authority to put it in check.
hurr durr we have freedums we r #1 in teh werld
No, you're supposed to be voting for nobody.
Nobody will keep election promises.
Nobody will listen to your concerns.
Nobody will help the poor and unemployed.
Nobody cares!
Nobody tells the truth.
Had the Founding Fathers taken this approach, Britain would have had a compliant colony. Everyone wins!
It's difficult to imagine an entity proclaiming itself as protecting the citizens, all the while removing the protections we've enjoyed as a people all these years.
Is the NSA so magnanimous that they can be trusted without question with all one's personal day-to-day activities and conversation? Should that even be an option for consideration?
If you can gain a fairly keen insight into a person from them answering 567 questions on the MMPI-2, what do you suppose could be learned from thousands of posts and emails? This could be performed without human intervention and continuously appended. Perhaps it already is. How about when you toss in personal phone calls?
No, placing an individual's exploitable frailties and weaknesses in a database for ready use isn't just immoral, it is evil. It is invasion of the psyche, and that the true crux of privacy issues.
Get over it and get a life.
Not really no true Scotsman since I'm not attempting to invalidate a counter-example, but yes, very few candidates in any party these days seem to hold to the party's supposed values. I suppose it seems more glaring in the Libertarian case since so many Libertarians evangelize like idealists.