Slashdot Mirror
Excuse Me While I Kiss This Guy: The Science of Misheard Song Lyrics
HughPickens.com writes Maria Konnikova writes in The New Yorker that mondegreens are funny but they also give us insight into the underlying nature of linguistic processing, how our minds make meaning out of sound, and how in fractions of seconds, we translate a boundless blur of sound into sense. One of the reasons we often mishear song lyrics is that there's a lot of noise to get through, and we usually can't see the musicians' faces. Other times, the misperceptions come from the nature of the speech itself, for example when someone speaks in an unfamiliar accent or when the usual structure of stresses and inflections changes, as it does in a poem or a song. Another common cause of mondegreens is the oronym: word strings in which the sounds can be logically divided multiple ways. One version that Steven Pinker describes goes like this: Eugene O'Neill won a Pullet Surprise. The string of phonetic sounds can be plausibly broken up in multiple ways—and if you're not familiar with the requisite proper noun, you may find yourself making an error.
Other times, the culprit is the perception of the sound itself: some letters and letter combinations sound remarkably alike, and we need further cues, whether visual or contextual, to help us out. In a phenomenon known as the McGurk effect, people can be made to hear one consonant when a similar one is being spoken. "There's a bathroom on the right" standing in for "there's a bad moon on the rise" is a succession of such similarities adding up to two equally coherent alternatives.
Finally along with knowledge, we're governed by familiarity: we are more likely to select a word or phrase that we're familiar with, a phenomenon known as Zipf's law. One of the reasons that "Excuse me while I kiss this guy" substituted for Jimi Hendrix's "Excuse me while I kiss the sky" remains one of the most widely reported mondegreens of all time can be explained in part by frequency. It's much more common to hear of people kissing guys than skies.
Other times, the culprit is the perception of the sound itself: some letters and letter combinations sound remarkably alike, and we need further cues, whether visual or contextual, to help us out. In a phenomenon known as the McGurk effect, people can be made to hear one consonant when a similar one is being spoken. "There's a bathroom on the right" standing in for "there's a bad moon on the rise" is a succession of such similarities adding up to two equally coherent alternatives.
Finally along with knowledge, we're governed by familiarity: we are more likely to select a word or phrase that we're familiar with, a phenomenon known as Zipf's law. One of the reasons that "Excuse me while I kiss this guy" substituted for Jimi Hendrix's "Excuse me while I kiss the sky" remains one of the most widely reported mondegreens of all time can be explained in part by frequency. It's much more common to hear of people kissing guys than skies.
I meant this, sorry:
http://www.amiright.com/misheard/stories/blacksabbath.shtml
Are you reeling in the yeast
Stowing away the thyme
Are you gathering up the cheese
Have you had enough of mine
My favourite: Knowledge is power, France is Bacon
This sig consists of eleven words, twenty syllables, and sixty-one letters.
In the garden of Eden, baby.
Grandaddy of them all i'int?
Some days it's just not worth
chewing through my restraints.
I've got a black magic woman and she's trying to take a pebble out of me.
I don't think that's what TFA was talking about. In the Ozzie case, the dad found the son dead and a song named "suicide solution". None of the lyrics could be misunderstood to sound like he was advocating suicide. The grieving father saw the title and jumped to conclusions.
Free Martian Whores!
This guy is crying. Can't you see the tears roll down the street?
I am not your blowing wind, I am the lightning.
I think this was intentional in Family guy.
The Censors it is Laugh and Cry.
To the listeners it is F'ing Cry
If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
Most Indian languages are written exactly as they are spoken, no silent letters. They also have very strict rules about how the pronunciation changes when say, a "n" follows a "ga" or "cha" or "ta" or "tha" or "pa". In fact Hindi would reduce "N" to a dot, because the preceding consonant would unambiguously define the pronunciation of the n, even though n has three different glyphs representing the labial, palatal and the dental versions of it.
Steven Pinker mentions some African languages using seven tenses instead of the usual present, past and future. Jared Diamond mentions some Pacific Island language that has words for "towards the sea" and "away from the sea", as in "there is a speck of dirt on your seawards cheek"
The richness of the languages and constructs are astounding. And most of the 6000 languages of the world are moribund and are expected to go extinct soon.
sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
Speaking of the richness of languages, TFA oversimplifies some important language tendencies too.
For example, Zipf's law (which is also linked in TFS) has little to do with "familiarity" or being "more likely to select a word or phrase that we're familiar with."
It basically is just an observation that the statistical ranking of word in most natural languages is inversely proportional to its frequency. From the Wiki article:
Thus the most frequent word will occur approximately twice as often as the second most frequent word, three times as often as the third most frequent word, etc. For example, in the Brown Corpus of American English text, the word "the" is the most frequently occurring word, and by itself accounts for nearly 7% of all word occurrences (69,971 out of slightly over 1 million). True to Zipf's Law, the second-place word "of" accounts for slightly over 3.5% of words (36,411 occurrences), followed by "and" (28,852). Only 135 vocabulary items are needed to account for half the Brown Corpus.
Yes, I suppose one might get out of this that "we tend to choose words we're more familiar with," but Zipf's law is a MUCH more specific constraint on distribution of word frequencies. And it's more a statement about what word frequency distributions ARE rather than how we come to choose words or what we may be "familiar with," unless by "familiar with" you just mean "occurs more frequently."
Moreover, there is some research that has shown a distribution somewhat like Zipf's law will emerge even in texts generated with artificial random "languages" composed of random letters... which makes the claims about how we're making conscious or sub-conscious choices about "familiarity" even less likely.
She's got electric boobs, and mohair pubes, you know I heard it from a Pakistani...
...could just be most singers are mumbling and the damned music is too loud.
Now, excuse me while I look for my fucking hearing aids.
When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
She's got electric boots, a mohair suit. Yoy know I read it in a magazine...
The iPad's sound chip has phenomenal fidelity, as does most digital hardware. (Although laptops often suffer signal noise due to unshielded signal lines outside the chip.) If he thinks we're getting poorer quality than in the 60s, he's mad. An iPad can produce a higher quality recording than anything the Beatles ever produced.
On the other hand, if he's talking about his recent material, sound quality is meaningless if the song is unlistenably crap.
Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
As a kid I always wondered what the hell submersibles had to do with free will.
Ignorance and prejudice and fear
Walk hand in hand
The words were difficult to understand due to the lead singers braces just having been retightened.
http://www.snopes.com/music/so...
Last summer I saw my nephew for the first time in a couple of years (he was about twelve years old) and found it eerie when he sang "Judy In Disguise" as "Judy In The Skies".
I'd made the same misinterpretation at his age; watching him sing those same wrong lyrics was like a time warp. First time I felt that weird "oh we've got some of the same 'DNA stuff' floating around in us" feeling. Wouldn't surprise me if it's because our brains are wired up quite similarly in some key places.
I think this was intentional in Family guy. The Censors it is Laugh and Cry. To the listeners it is F'ing Cry
I can see how someone might hear Fing Cry, but I always heard Laugh and Cry. I mean, Laugh and Cry is much more common a phrase than F'ing Cry. and why F'ing Cry doesn't fit in context at all. "Lucky there's a man who positively can do all the things that make us F'ing Cry"? Why are we lucky there's a guy that can make us cry? Laugh and cry, yes. Just cry? No.
If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
Back when Titanic was in the theaters (for the first time, so this was ages ago), a local teen music program released a list of requests for the theme song. "Will my hair go on" and "Will my hard-on go on" were my favourites.
NASA used to employ stenographers to record meetings, who would then transcribe their notes. I remember reading some transcripts that repeatedly mentioned "chief horses", and it took me a few moments to realize it was "G-forces" being mentioned.
The Censors it is Laugh and Cry.
To the listeners it is F'ing Cry
Look that up in your Funk and Wagnall's.
sigh I know, only people over 50 will get that one. The rest of you, get off my lawn.
At the time I first heard "Rock the Casbah" I didn't know the word "sharif" so there was no chance at all that I would not mishear that lyric.
The lossy compression really doesn't lose a lot acoustically. Some harmonics and some complex high-frequency sounds (like cymbals) are affected, but this is highly dependent on bitrate and codec. At 192Kbps, AAC doesn't lose much at all.
The biggest issue is the overuse of range compression effects on the original master recording to make the sound more punchy. Listen to a Beatles recording vs. anything recent. Look at the waveform of any popular music and you'll see an almost solid block with no variation. It's meant to sound loud, not sound good. Partly so that all parts of the song survive in a noisy environment like your car, and partly to accommodate junk speakers.
Reminds me of the old quest catchphrase "Committed to Service Inaction" that you'd hear on TV commercials.
The next version of the commercial they changed the pacing so that it was "Commited to. Service. ... In. ... Action" in a really halting speech.
The next version of the commercial, they either dropped the phrase or changed it entirely. It just wasn't possible to say it clearly.
The Quirkz Handbook of Self-Improvement for People Who Are Already Pretty Okay
It's much more common to hear of people kissing guys than skies.
In THIS day and age yes. In the day and age he made the song hell no. Never even dawned on me to think he says guy. But there are plenty of songs with hard to hear clearly words.
Jack of all trades,master of none
OM f'ing G... I remember being like 8 years old driving from LA to Victorville and hearing that song and asking my mom why they'd sing about a "bathroom on the right". She just laughed and told me it was "bad moon on the rise" and kept laughing and laughing and laughin. All these years I thought I was the only one. Thank god for this article. Now I know I'm not alone or weird. I don't have to kill myself now as all my reasons for being depressed stemmed from this one incident and now that I know others heard it too I feel so much better. Guess I can take the suicide hotline off my favorites list now...
People are terrible at enunciation in their normal speech and that's the reason why enunciation is terrible in songs. It has nothing to do with singing properly.
The most flagrant offender of enunciation is "chewing" where you have a hard T followed by the word "you". The common result is a chew such as "I want you" becoming "I wan chew". It's sloppy and lazy.
I say this as someone who has had the pleasure of performing solos in front of a live audience where you don't get the luxury of redos for that CD recording.
"Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork