Slashdot Mirror


Investigation: Apple Failing To Protect Chinese Factory Workers

mrspoonsi writes with the findings of an investigation into working conditions at a factory that makes Apple products. Poor treatment of workers in Chinese factories which make Apple products has been discovered by an undercover BBC Panorama investigation. Filming on an iPhone 6 production line showed Apple's promises to protect workers were routinely broken. It found standards on workers' hours, ID cards, dormitories, work meetings and juvenile workers were being breached at the Pegatron factories. Apple said it strongly disagreed with the programme's conclusions. Exhausted workers were filmed falling asleep on their 12-hour shifts at the Pegatron factories on the outskirts of Shanghai. One undercover reporter, working in a factory making parts for Apple computers, had to work 18 days in a row despite repeated requests for a day off. Another reporter, whose longest shift was 16 hours, said: "Every time I got back to the dormitories, I wouldn't want to move. Even if I was hungry I wouldn't want to get up to eat. I just wanted to lie down and rest. I was unable to sleep at night because of the stress."

201 comments

  1. But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can still have more iPhone? The workers are there to do work. I pay.

    1. Re:But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anything to supply our endless needs.

  2. Why Apple? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why is it Apple's fault or Apple's problem? First of all these are Foxconn workers. Secondly Foxconn manufactures hardware for a lot of companies, not just Apple.

    1. Re:Why Apple? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It seems I should at least read the summary before commenting. Replace Foxconn with Pegatron in my comment above, but the argument still stands.

    2. Re:Why Apple? by kuzb · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because Apple made a statement that they would not do business with companies that acted like this, and yet, here they are doing business with companies who act like this.

      To think Apple has no influence in this situation is absurd.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    3. Re:Why Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yet Pegatron under cut Foxconn's price on the job, why would anybody think the conditions would be any better there?

    4. Re:Why Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Apple made a statement that they would not do business with companies that acted like this, and yet, here they are doing business with companies who act like this.

      To think Apple has no influence in this situation is absurd.

      Oh, and you believed they originators of the walled garden?

      Despite the fact Apple is just as much a profit-driven corporation as Exxon or Verizon?

      Lemme guess, you also think Google doesn't do evil.

    5. Re: Why Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The question wasn't a comparative one, but an inquiry as to responsibility in general terms.

      You can worry over who is most evil another time.

    6. Re:Why Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah sure its ok. Oh and they can donate to other causes they care about.

      http://news.yahoo.com/apples-c...

      Screw the proletariat that makes your trinkets.

    7. Re:Why Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because Apple is supposed to be a better company (going as far as putting Designed in California on all their products), not built on top of slavery conditions.

      Because Apple's products cost like they are built in America or in Germany.

      Of course, it's all a sham. But there are expectations nonetheless for the Elite company.

    8. Re:Why Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These western media tripe are mostly propaganda penned by tiny penis haters.

      One undercover reporter, working in a factory making parts for Apple computers, had to work 18 days in a row despite repeated requests for a day off.

      Sure, if this guy were Stephen Hawking with indispensable skills. Obviously wasting his irreplaceable talents as an "undercover reporter".

      Another reporter, whose longest shift was 16 hours, said: "Every time I got back to the dormitories, I wouldn't want to move.

      That means the next guy only had to do 8 hours. It all balance out over a week.

      Furthermore, is Pegatron having to beat off with sticks hordes of wannabe employees, or how easy was it for the BBC to insert numerous "undercover reporters" into one facility.

      The poor conditions in Chinese factories were highlighted in 2010 when 14 workers killed themselves at Apple's biggest supplier, Foxconn.

      Can't argue with BBC about this sad statistics, I just wish western media wouldn't be so conspicuous by its silence about mentioning any suicides here in the west though.
      By western media (lack of) indications, nobody commits suicides here in the west.

    9. Re:Why Apple? by DexterIsADog · · Score: 2

      Funny, but in your post you could substitute "The United States" for "Apple", and "which doesn't torture people" for "not built on top of slavery conditions", and the point stands.

      Of course, "The United States" was *also* "built on top of slavery conditions", but you can't make an omelet and so on...

    10. Re:Why Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is it Apple's fault or Apple's problem?

      Because the last time this behavior happened to go public (about a year ago) Apple made promises not to behave this way in the future in order to counter the negative PR. But like most big corporations Apple literally does not care about worker abuse. They simply demand the outsourced company's management to "product x number of units for y price by z deadline, and we don't care how you do it, just make it happen." It's not just Apple, it's every US corporation using child slave labor in China to avoid paying a living wage elsewhere (are you listening Reebok?, Nike?).

    11. Re:Why Apple? by lippydude · · Score: 1

      @ArcadeMan: "It seems I should at least read the summary before commenting. Replace Foxconn with Pegatron in my comment above, but the argument still stands."

      Because Apple isn't paying as much as you-know-who to trash their competitors reputation, Despite the fact that Foxconn/Pegatron make devices for both companies :)

    12. Re:Why Apple? by vux984 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why is it Apple's fault or Apple's problem? First of all these are Foxconn workers. Secondly Foxconn manufactures hardware for a lot of companies, not just Apple.

      Apple is profitable. Not merely "regular" corporation profitable. But the sort of profitable Fortune 500 corporations look at in awe of.

      Further, it's profitable per unit made. Its not making a few cents and selling billions of units. Its making serious cash off every single solitary unit.

      Unlike a lot of other businesses at the top of this exploitation food-chain, Apple can well afford to pay these guys a lot better, not change their prices, and STILL be quite profitable.

      That arguably makes their situation both a lot less defensible and a lot more newsworthy.

      Just as Nike in the 90s when they took major heat over thier sweatshop labor producing insanely profitable $120 runners. They too were a globally recognized brand selling a premium "lifestyle" product ... and its image conscious consumers didn't want to wear that guilt. And at the prices / profit margins involved they were paying for runners there was no reason Nike couldn't afford to treat its workers betters.

      Fast forward 15 years. And its Apple. Same situation.

    13. Re:Why Apple? by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      The poor conditions in Chinese factories were highlighted in 2010 when 14 workers killed themselves at Apple's biggest supplier, Foxconn.

      Can't argue with BBC about this sad statistics,

      Well, if suicides show poor conditions - what do lack of suicides show? What was so special about 2010?

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    14. Re:Why Apple? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Because apple may have problems selling their devices when the public is informed of the horrific abuses (deaths, suicide, maiming, cancer) involved in their pretty products.

      When opens users of iphones up to comments from others about how evil their phones are and how could they buy a phone built with such evil methods. And when they are made to think about how evil the build process is- some of them feel uncomfortable.

      And because apple builds enough of the devices that it can be identified by reporters unlike many other essentially anonymous unknown products that are less famous.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    15. Re:Why Apple? by Jawnn · · Score: 1

      Why is it Apple's fault or Apple's problem? First of all these are Foxconn workers. Secondly Foxconn manufactures hardware for a lot of companies, not just Apple.

      You are deliberately missing the point or you didn't even read TFS. Then again, this is /., so both are possibilities. Here, let me spell it out for you, again. Apple didn't commit the labor offenses, but they did promise to not do business with companies who do commit those offenses. Now it is clear that they are breaking those promises because it's still profitable to do so, because for Apple fan-boys, cool requires sacrifice. And conscience is an easy thing to offer up.

    16. Re:Why Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Companies can manufacture products themselves or buy in from suppliers. This doesn't absolve them from responsibility. Otherwise companies would just invent hands-length subsidiaries to distance themselves from abuses.

      As we are constantly reminded, it is a global market nowadays and everything is interconnected.

      It is Apple's responsibility and Apple's problem because Apple have a code of "labor and human rights" for suppliers. See https://www.apple.com/uk/supplier-responsibility/labor-and-human-rights/

      Apple sets itself up to have high ethical and moral standards. If this is the case it shouldn't be surprised if they are held to them.

    17. Re:Why Apple? by gnupun · · Score: 1

      Why is it Apple's fault or Apple's problem? First of all these are Foxconn workers.

      They (thousands of foxconn employees) are Apple workers because they build Apple products only, not generic phones. Foxconn is just a middleman that allows Apple to hire cheap, foreign labor. So these workers have two bosses, the foxconn ones and the Apple bosses at a higher level. And both are responsible for the welfare of the workers.

      Secondly Foxconn manufactures hardware for a lot of companies, not just Apple.

      Let me repeat that a segment of Foxconn employees work on Apple products only. For Apple to be not responsible, this segment of employees should work for multiple hardware vendors, but that's not the case.

    18. Re:Why Apple? by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      Because the buck has to stop somewhere.

      And because as a civilisation we don't think "We didn't know" is a defense against crimes committed in the pursuit of your end goal. We used to hang people for that.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    19. Re:Why Apple? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Because it is a documentary.
      Today's documentaries are based on the following logic.
      1. I have a point of view on something.
      2. Dig into the details and cherry pick the select items that enforce my view.
      3. Use only the lamest rebuttals to make it seem like I am impartial.
      3.a. I will find the busiest person to ask and post his non-comment as a proof he is up to something undesirable.
      4. Mix it together and make profit from the others who had the same idea as me.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    20. Re: Why Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You actually believed them though?

      They have this massive track record of lying through their teeth, and even have several lawsuits (which they lost)... accelerating phone performance 10 fold on ads without saying so (3G performance), selling US band-only LTE tablets in UK, the list goes on...

    21. Re: Why Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heck if he could, Stevie would treat us employees like that.
      At least the current one only screws vendors (gtech etc) and little fanboys

    22. Re:Why Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The poor conditions in Chinese factories were highlighted in 2010 when 14 workers killed themselves at Apple's biggest supplier, Foxconn.

      Strange. Didn't it come out that the workers in question weren't working on Apple gear? I know the group that threatened mass suicide was working on an XBox production line (360, IIRC). Strange how no one pays attention to that...

    23. Re:Why Apple? by FuegoFuerte · · Score: 1

      Actually, suicide is typically not talked about in Western media because they're trying not to encourage copycats. That's why, with very few exceptions (Robin Williams, other famous people) you typically won't find anything in the paper. I know Microsoft has had at least one jumper from the Lincoln Square office in Bellevue, other tech companies probably have too. Funny thing, anywhere you treat people as sub-human for long enough, strange psychological things happen and they start to lose the will to live.

      But, by and large, I agree with the lack of coverage in the media. People who may be borderline suicidal can be triggered by reading about other peoples' suicides, no need for the media to perpetuate the problem with in-depth coverage and how-to guides.

    24. Re: Why Apple? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      They have this massive track record of lying through their teeth

      You must admit, in fairness, that those teeth are very white and shiny with nice rounded corners.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  3. Question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Question. Why do they work people so hard instead of just hiring more people? Are these guys salaried instead of hourly? Is it about keeping down costs on training or employee benefits like dormitories they don't think they can operate without? It can't be a massive labor shortage or the employees would quit and find somewhere else to work...

    1. Re:Question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a labor surplus problem for the workers - they either deal with horrid conditions or the next guy takes the 1 renminbi / hour pay and he gets 0.

      They face a downward spiral ending in even greater poverty.

      Existence / enforcement of legal protections for workers by the consumers who ultimately demand these goods is the only option given the Chinese government's position on actual workers rights. And that can only be effected through cutting demand to enforce the requirement through Apple.

      Apple promised to make the working conditions part of its future agreements but failed to do so. To help workers now there is better enforcement by Apple, or boycott to force them to action.

    2. Re:Question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some workers actually want the overtime, the extra pay. They aren't worried about burning out since its not a career. For a peasant on the farm a factory jobs is a way to support the family back on the farm for multiple years.

      The worker's reference point for hard working conditions and long hours is farming, not a modern factory in the US or EU.

      A worker who quits one factory job may have a hard time finding another. A prospective employer may view quitting as disloyalty, think the worker a potential troublemaker, and just prefer to hire the next kid fresh from the farm and eager to please. An exception being new year where there is "officially" 7+ days of holiday. Some go back home and don't return. Supposedly its a big problem for factories. So whether it is more "acceptable" to leave at that time or the factories are desperate for workers or both, getting a factory job immediately after new year may be easier. However mid year if you had a job and quit, good luck.

      The above is with respect to these huge factory complexes. The world of the small scale sweatshops that are sometimes used as subcontractors, well that is a very different story.

    3. Re:Question. by tlambert · · Score: 1

      Question. Why do they work people so hard instead of just hiring more people? Are these guys salaried instead of hourly? Is it about keeping down costs on training or employee benefits like dormitories they don't think they can operate without? It can't be a massive labor shortage or the employees would quit and find somewhere else to work...

      The cost to the company for an employee includes more than just that employee' hourly wage, and much of it is not fungible.

      This is why in the U.S. we have 3 people working 40 hour weeks, instead of 4 people working 30 hour weeks. In order to reduce the work week length, we'd need to be able to make 3x40 equivalent to 4x30 for the employer. Most of the overhead that makes this losing math is associated with government, although there's also per employee equipment costs and space costs at the worksite. Everything else is pretty much unfunded government mandates per employee, so that the more employees you have, the higher your costs.

    4. Re:Question. by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      Question. Why do they work people so hard instead of just hiring more people? Are these guys salaried instead of hourly? Is it about keeping down costs on training or employee benefits like dormitories they don't think they can operate without? It can't be a massive labor shortage or the employees would quit and find somewhere else to work...

      The are paid for overtime. Many people _want_ overtime because it is cash in their pocket. I think most of the reason to pressure people into overtime is (a) stupidity (I'd want workers who are fresh and not tired), (b) disrespect for workers, and (c) genuinely not enough people to hire.

      That's different from the USA where the causes are (a) stupidity (I'd want workers who are fresh and not tired), (b) disrespect for workers, and (c) greed, pressuring people to work overtime without pay.

  4. Other Chinese Companies are Worse by BoRegardless · · Score: 1

    From what I read the steel, coal and general chemistry industries are quite bad. Apple has actually tried to clean up with their vendor requirements.

    1. Re:Other Chinese Companies are Worse by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Apple didn't promise to make those industries behave.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    2. Re:Other Chinese Companies are Worse by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 0

      Apple didn't promise to make those industries behave.

      And, your precious Android phone as well as most of your other electronics come from places the same or even much worse.

      This is a serious subject, but the "story" such that it is, is clearly just anti-Apple fan-boi blather, and thus virtually meaningless.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    3. Re:Other Chinese Companies are Worse by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Virtually meaningless is to associate Apple with Android.

      And the steel, coal and general chemistry industries.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    4. Re:Other Chinese Companies are Worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple didn't promise to make those industries behave.

      And, your precious Android phone as well as most of your other electronics come from places the same or even much worse .

      nobody said anything about any other manufacturer, you are just doing that to try to divert attention from your precious apple so you can continue lining up around the block like cattle ready to plonk down whatever apple tells you to be another sheep with this years incremental iproduct update. for fuck sake you arent going to get to the front of the line and get denied because you didnt defend them when you had the opportunity, it is ok to criticize them when they are obviously doing the wrong thing, stop fearing them.

      and no i couldnt give a crap about the bloated, buggy, insecure android or the abortion of windows phone or whatever other phone oses there are.

  5. Chinese need to protect themselves for a change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple can't be there to make sure everyone is happy all the time. They're too busy putting nets under all the tall buildings. It's time for the Chinese to stand up for themselves instead of passing out and/or jumping off things when they get tired.

  6. You have selected....... by Tailhook · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You have chosen to rationalize the exploitation of Chinese workers, probably using a product you or your employer couldn't afford to purchase if manufactured by someone that shared your pleasant lifestyle. Your rationalization is characterized by one or more of the following possible memes;

    [_] Making iPhones in a Chinese factory is better than being a Chinese peasant
    [_] iPhones/Pads would cost too much if I had to pay my fellow citizens to make them
    [_] iPhones/Pads would cost too much given environmental regulations I vehemently insist on for myself
    [X] All the other manufacturers are doing it too
    [_] Some/Many/Most Chinese workers appreciate 70 hour weeks and breathing my aluminum dust
    [X] It's not Apple, it's Foxconn
    [_] It's not Apple, it's the Chinese government
    [_] They should quit if they don't like it
    [_] It's just capitalism at work
    [_] It's just communism at work
    [_] Apple's disposable workers are paid better than non-Apple disposable workers
    [_] Apple's auditors didn't find any serious issues
    [_] Some day the Chinese will be too wealthy to exploit
    [_] Your Android is Foxconn too
    [_] You're an Apple hater using Apple as a scapegoat
    [_] I also work 60/80/100/120 hour weeks at my IT job
    [_] Apple designers are in the US
    [_] The US did the same thing to the British
    [_] The US had slaves once too
    [_] The US has prison labor today
    [_] It's up to the Chinese to stand up to their oppressive government
    [_] There are lines of willing workers outside Foxconn factories
    [_] If any company were to stop the exploitation, I really think it'll be Apple
    [_] Your free Linux runs on Chinese hardware too
    [_] Foxconn workers think they have it great, so it's ok!
    [_] Foxconn worker suicide rate is lower than Chicago's murder rate
    [_] Foxconn worker suicide rate is lower than China's suicide rate
    [_] We can't pollute the whole world!
    [_] Half of all US households have an Apple product
    [_] If we don't exploit them they'll never develop
    [_] The suicide's families get the insurance money
    [_] You're posting from a macbook/iphone/ipad right now
    [_] There are suicide nets on American bridges
    [_] Interns in the US don't get paid
    [_] They don't beat the workers, apparently.
    [_] Why is this news? We expect this from China.
    [_] It's their country; we have no right to judge.

    --
    Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    1. Re:You have selected....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How long did it take you to write that...

    2. Re:You have selected....... by Tailhook · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I didn't write them. I collected them.

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    3. Re:You have selected....... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      That's right. This is just another iPhone versus Android conflict. It's all just the big-blue-meanie against Apple, same as always.

    4. Re:You have selected....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Epic post. Thank you.

    5. Re:You have selected....... by LessThanObvious · · Score: 1

      I would like to see a cultural shift in business where instead of the company that designs the product taking a gigantic slice and the company that runs the retail store taking a giant slice, the manufacturer that invests the time and effort into making the product would get a much, much greater share. If the manufacturer was guaranteed 10% of the final retail price per unit on any product produced, no matter where it was made, we could actually demand a stop to human rights violations in return for paying them enough to compensate for their contribution to the product. That or we can let the big corporations have it all, because their magic design fairy dust is the only part of process that actually creates value.

    6. Re:You have selected....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I didn't write them. I collected them

      From somebody else.

    7. Re:You have selected....... by TopSpin · · Score: 1

      somebody else

      Nope.

      --
      Lurking at the bottom of the gravity well, getting old
    8. Re:You have selected....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope.

      I'm a different AC posting from behind a poxy proxy. From where I sit this seems a little disingenuous of you.

      There are several lines in the quoted post that are word-for-word the same as your post.

      You've certainly contributed something here but credit where credit is due, right?

    9. Re:You have selected....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't recall reading anything about GPL or CC in either of the 2 posts. By default it is public domain.

    10. Re:You have selected....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't recall reading anything about GPL or CC in either of the 2 posts. By default it is public domain.

      No, it absolutely is not. That's like saying anything on the Internet is public domain. Copyright applies whether you register it or not. The Internet is also considered as publishing. Don't believe me. Go swipe an image from the Getty website and publish it on your own page somewhere. See how long it takes to get a bill or a DMCA takedown notice.

      https://ucomm.wsu.edu/the-internet-copyright/

    11. Re:You have selected....... by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 1

      An apple falls from a farmers tree, and rolls to your feet.
      You pick up the apple, and eat it
      You didn't grow the apple, but you ate it as if it were yours by default.
      How do you justify that ?

    12. Re:You have selected....... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      probably using a product you or your employer couldn't afford to purchase if manufactured by someone that shared your pleasant lifestyle.

      That isn't the case. Profit margins on Apple phones are some of the highest in the industry. Other manufacturers manage to make cheaper phones under better conditions, e.g. LG which has factories in South Korea or Sharp who have factories in Japan.

      Apple could choose to make less money and pay more for manufacturing, which in turn would allow for higher wages and better conditions, without raising prices. It appears to be a case of working conditions shareholder value.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    13. Re:You have selected....... by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Other manufacturers manage to make cheaper phones under better conditions, e.g. LG which has factories in South Korea

      And in China. And problems with the environment and working conditions world-wide (and most certainly in South Korea too) http://www.corp-research.org/LG

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    14. Re:You have selected....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to list a few options that a majority would probably choose: A severe lack of available "fucks" to give, You don't approve of the treatment but are too lazy to actually do something about it. I'm in both.

    15. Re:You have selected....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) An apple is consumed where he has collected then shared with an audience, closer would be he cut up the apple and distributed pieces to everyone standing nearby
      2) "ate it as if it were yours by default" suggests that he somehow claimed the post as his own work...which he didn't
      3) this is hardly the first "You have selected" post...this isn't rounded corners man

      Its an amusing list of BS responses and it is on topic so what's the problem?

    16. Re:You have selected....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not doing anything to benefit the Chinese worker. People ignoring their exploitation and buying their product are at least helping give them jobs they're willing to do.

    17. Re:You have selected....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, by default it's under *copyright*. You had no right to appropriate it for yourself, unless it was originally distributed under some license which granted you that right.

    18. Re:You have selected....... by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

      Can we get a formatted version of that, please?

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    19. Re:You have selected....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya fuck those Chinks. Whites know best.

  7. Re:And whose fault is this? by CaptainDork · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I started to write this and then I canceled because you're a troll and then I got pissed and started/canceled again, but anyway, fuck you and stuff.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  8. Yes, Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Apple: The great Chinese American Sock Puppet of Technology. They do this because they can, and people will still buy from them while believing the sock puppet has a life of its own. Apple still thinks it is its own "person", when in fact once they sold out to the Chinese they lost themselves and their technology to China. The American operations are not even so much gilt and lace on the emperor because in fact, the emperor has no clothes any more. Apple America can say all they want, but the Chinese will do what the Chinese want. That is because they actually walk the walk and make technology. They don't do that in America any more.

  9. working in the valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Every time I got back to the dormitories, I wouldn't want to move. Even if I was hungry I wouldn't want to get up to eat. I just wanted to lie down and rest. I was unable to sleep at night because of the stress."

    that doesn't sound that different from my years working in ops and dev in the valley :)

    1. Re:working in the valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Steve Jobs was the true Slave Master in the recent job and salary control scandal of the Silicon Valley ;)

      I guess there's nothing unexpected in this latest story!

    2. Re:working in the valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Every time I got back to the dormitories, I wouldn't want to move. Even if I was hungry I wouldn't want to get up to eat. I just wanted to lie down and rest. I was unable to sleep at night because of the stress."

      that doesn't sound that different from my years working in ops and dev in the valley :)

      Oh, that's just awesome! It echoes Don Rumsfeld's dismissal of "stress positions" as torture, when he cited forcing people to stand for 4 hours. "I stand 8-10 hours a day". Can you perhaps make a distinction between your job and that of Chinese workers who are virtual slaves? If not, I could come explain it to you, while I hit you over the head with a sock filled with quarters.

  10. man up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work 12-16 hours all the time in the united states, wheres my fucking news article, and I work in a job that requires more robot than showing up and being a robot, I also pay for my own housing, food, and transportation.

    so either man up and quit bitching or man up and quit your shithole job, its that fucking simple

    1. Re:man up by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Maybe you should move to China and work for Foxconn. Them perhaps someone would care about you.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:man up by Dzimas · · Score: 1

      You're in the office 12-16 hours a day, but I suspect you'd accomplish more if you were only there and well focused for 6 or 7 hours. :)

    3. Re:man up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work in manufacturing thank you little miss know it all

    4. Re:man up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still applies.

    5. Re:man up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked in an office for similar hours (12-13). I couldn't sleep, I was bordering on a nervous breakdown, couldn't eat, couldn't do anything but work. I got fuck all money for it. The whole point was my boss decided he didn't want me in the job so set me up - the new girl has fewer hours than I do, less work, better equipment.

      Anyway, back to my point: I really feel for these guys. Far, far worse conditions, more hours, numbers of similar breaks. Fuck Apple for enabling them, and fuck Pegatron.

  11. 12 hour factory shifts? by checkitout · · Score: 1

    12 hour factory shifts are/were common in the U.S. as well, before all the factory jobs got moved overseas.

    1. Re: 12 hour factory shifts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, worker studies in the US showed 12 hour days were more inefficient than 8 hour days.

    2. Re:12 hour factory shifts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was about a lifetime between the 12hr standard shifts and moving the factories overseas. If we'd exported political labor power* instead of our factories, the whole world might have had 40 hour workweeks, safety standards, a minimum wage that raises a family...

      * whether as unions, democratic standards, heck, enlightened long-term interest of factory-owners; anything to countervail the race to the bottom.

    3. Re: 12 hour factory shifts? by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      thats a nice study, doesnt change the fact that it is still common anywhere in manufacturing

    4. Re:12 hour factory shifts? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 5, Informative

      AFTER unions got torn apart, in the US, perhaps.

      but in my grandfather's day (turn of the 1900's), they fought for better working conditions and this is where the 5-day work week came from, time and a half (or more!) for overtime and I remember my GF telling me that 'every 4 hours, they are required to let us eat'. even today, at my 'cushy IT job' I don't get a food break every 4 hours. not that I need it, but its a thing that we once had and lost due to 'those evil unions' (sigh).

      so, conditions were horrible in the US, we fought to make them more human-like and we won.

      then, we lost them ALL. pretty much all of it.

      cops and other groups have unions and no one says a word about it. but if IT guys or factory guys want to have a union, its 'hey, why do you hate america' and shit like that.

      if my GF was still alive, he'd be furious for the things he and his peers fought for and yet we let drift away over the years.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    5. Re: 12 hour factory shifts? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Actually, worker studies in the US showed 12 hour days were more inefficient than 8 hour days.

      Can you provide a citation? I certainly believe that an 8 hour shift is more productive per hour, but I have a very hard time believing that overall, more work is accomplished by working 8 hours than by working 12 hours.

    6. Re:12 hour factory shifts? by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      12 hour factory shifts are/were common in the U.S. as well, before all the factory jobs got moved overseas.

      Sure, but those included various mandatory breaks, and overtime pay. There are also much stricter safety standards (which still aren't good enough).

    7. Re: 12 hour factory shifts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They work out roughly equvilant. Look at it this way, if your factory ran three shifts a day rather than two, it would me more productive per hour 24 hours a day.

    8. Re: 12 hour factory shifts? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Can you provide a citation?

      They work out roughly equvilant. Look at it this way ...

      Your ignorant blabbering is not a citation. If you say "studies showed ..." then you should be able to cite the studies.

    9. Re: 12 hour factory shifts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of sourcesw around which talk about productivity when compared against work day length and even break/work intervals within the day if you do a quick Google search.

    10. Re:12 hour factory shifts? by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 0

      if my GF was still alive, he'd be furious for the things he and his peers fought for

      Uh.. umm.. Oh. *head-desk*

      Note to self: GF can also stand in for grandfather.

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    11. Re: 12 hour factory shifts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try every basic time-study done in management science since fucking Taylor-ism started.

    12. Re: 12 hour factory shifts? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of sourcesw around which talk about productivity when compared against work day length and even break/work intervals within the day if you do a quick Google search.

      Not a SINGLE ONE of this sources says that more work is accomplished in an eight hour work day, than in a twelve hour work day. Of course shorter hours are more productive per hour, which is all these studies show. That is not the same as showing there is no incremental gain.

    13. Re: 12 hour factory shifts? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Try every basic time-study done in management science since fucking Taylor-ism started.

      Insisting that lots of studies support your opinion is not the same as actually citing one.

    14. Re: 12 hour factory shifts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut the hell up and take some time to learn about managerial economics - there is no single answer for every job, but for each job there is a point where increase production efficiency with shorter hours offsets the risk of loss in production for the excluded hours. That is, workers lose productivity with longer shifts (tired, etc.) so either rates fall or quality control (inspection) falls - both are costs. Paying a 3rd shift of workers allowing 8 hours per shift per day is a cost. When the first is greater than the second is what you're looking for, and it is easy to see why/how and for specific situations easy to calculate the exact value.

    15. Re: 12 hour factory shifts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Try Abbe.

      http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Munster/Industrial/chap17.htm

      To quote:

      "It was found that everywhere, even abstracting from all other cultural and social interests, a moderate shortening of the working day did not involve loss, but brought a direct gain. The German [p. 213] pioneer in the movement for the shortening of the workingman's day, Ernst Abbé, the head of one of the greatest German factories, wrote many years ago that the shortening from nine to eight hours, that is, a cutting-down of more than 10 per cent, did not involve a reduction of the day's product, but an increase, and that this increase did not result from any supplementary efforts by which the intensity of the work would be reinforced in an unhygienic way.[41] This conviction of Abbé still seems to hold true after millions of experiments over the whole globe."

    16. Re: 12 hour factory shifts? by gnasher719 · · Score: 2

      Well, I found it in a book by Eysenck about a study in war-time Britain, where he found that workers working 57 hours a week in arms production were less productive _per week_, not just _per hour_, than workers on a 48 hour week. And these were people who should have been highly motivated for obvious reasons.

    17. Re: 12 hour factory shifts? by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

      Depends on what you are doing, putting peg A into slot B just needs a warm body. Coding, or doing someone's taxes etc. would definitely degrade over time.

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    18. Re: 12 hour factory shifts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck off you apologist. Every post in this article ahs been about you defending these horrid labor practices. I dont know if your a stock holder or what but go fuck yourself ok?

    19. Re:12 hour factory shifts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work in IT and am a member of Office and Professional Employees International Union (OPEIU). You are free to form a local union wherever you work and there's nothing the company can do to stop you. If they try, well then you have a monster lawsuit. We get paid hourly, over time is time and a half and Sunday is double time.

    20. Re:12 hour factory shifts? by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      Off-topic? For a joke?

      I think someone needs to lighten up some.

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
  12. We had this in USA by iggymanz · · Score: 1

    labor movement born

    what do commies do?

    1. Re:We had this in USA by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      Communism was supposed to be a labor movement.

      It's clear that whatever China has is not communism, if it ever was.

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    2. Re:We had this in USA by perpenso · · Score: 1

      Communism was supposed to be a labor movement. It's clear that whatever China has is not communism, if it ever was.

      When has communism as seen in the real world ever been anything other than a vehicle to make the people's needs subservient to the state's needs. Right now that state needs jobs to urbanize the population and foreign currency to fund modernization. Things seem to be working quite normally for a communist state, the government is getting what it wants regardless of the cost to the people.

    3. Re:We had this in USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My government is doing the same, except it's a right wing government. Wait a minute! IT'S MEANT TO BE EBIL COMMIES THAT CAUSE PROBLEMS!

    4. Re:We had this in USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My government is doing the same, except it's a right wing government. Wait a minute! IT'S MEANT TO BE EBIL COMMIES THAT CAUSE PROBLEMS!

      Somehow I doubt your post is accurate. I doubt you have a fascist government. I suspect you have a government whose executive and legislature were chosen by the citizens in elections and that the politicians get away with exactly as much mischief as the voters allow. After all the voters are perfectly free to throw them out. Unlike the leadership of fascist and communist governments that we have seen in history.

    5. Re:We had this in USA by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      We do have corporate fascism in the United States, 95% the candidates in federal elections are in the pockets of large corporation, and thus in most cases voting doesn't matter at the federal level to effect any change

    6. Re:We had this in USA by perpenso · · Score: 1

      You are mistaken. The voters are in charge, the voters are in control. They just use their votes poorly.

      The true currency of politics is votes, not money. And since the system is one person one vote, the 99%s are in charge. If a candidate fears that a significant number of voters will vote against him if he supports a corporation on a particular issue then he will side with the voters not the corporation. Above all things, politicians desire re-election. They will only server corporations to the extent that it does not jeopardize their re-election, in other words to the extent that the voters allow.

      Irregardless of corporate donations, voters could establish control by punitive voting. The voting out of office of a politician who too often sides with corporations over voters. No passes because of party or position on some other issue, just always voted out if siding too often with corporation. That will create a Darwinian effect that caused politicians to fear and be more responsible to voters.

      The biggest trap for voters in the U.S. is party loyalty. Being a member of a party is fine, but automatically voting for your party candidates makes you irrelevant. You are irrelevant to your party because they already have your vote, you are irrelevant to the other party because they can not attain your vote. The only voters who matter in the U.S. are independents and those Dem/Rep party members who are willing to break ranks and vote for candidates other than from their party.

  13. Fix it teechnically. by cheekyboy · · Score: 2

    Hey apple, use your own products to fix this mess.

    RFID fobs on workers, computers to monitor working hours, and computers to mandate rest times etc...

    Mangers that over work people, SACKED!

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    1. Re:Fix it teechnically. by enjar · · Score: 1

      Unless that RFID tag is implanted in the worker, that system is going to get faked out, too.

    2. Re:Fix it teechnically. by GigaplexNZ · · Score: 1

      Even then it could still be faked pretty easily, just make some cloned RFID tags.

    3. Re:Fix it teechnically. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easier solution: cloned workers - like in Moon

    4. Re:Fix it teechnically. by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Godammit.

      Snape kills Dumbledore!

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    5. Re:Fix it teechnically. by rwa2 · · Score: 2

      Hey apple, use your own products to fix this mess.

      They did... all of their products are completely sealed and unserviceable. Otherwise you'd be opening them up and finding all of the "Help! I'm trapped in a Chinese iPhone factory!" messages inside.

  14. Failing in order to protect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is next? Being inside sensitive clods?

  15. May I say two things? by riskkeyesq · · Score: 1, Insightful

    1. Nazis 2. Hitler. There, we're done here.

  16. What about other manufacturers? by Dzimas · · Score: 4, Interesting

    These conversations inevitably focus on Apple, but what about contract workers in similar factories who make phones for Samsung, Huawei, Microsoft (that still feels weird to write) and newcomers like OnePlus? I suspect that conditions are worse, simply because there is less external oversight.

    1. Re:What about other manufacturers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple advertises that it does better. You can argue all you want about the relative niceties, but false advertising, that's a crime.

    2. Re:What about other manufacturers? by thegarbz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      but what about contract workers in similar factories who make phones for Samsung, Huawei, Microsoft (that still feels weird to write) and newcomers like OnePlus? I suspect that conditions are worse, simply because there is less external oversight.

      It's irrelevant what the conditions on those other products are because the companies haven't shouted from the roof tops how much they are doing to prevent the situation and don't have a wanky, shiny, HTML5 advertisement page linked prominently on their corporate homepage talking about how much awesome their supplier responsibility is than everyone else.

      Apple isn't being held to a higher generic standard. They are being held to their own standard.

    3. Re:What about other manufacturers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None of them are using Pegatron. All of those you list are still using FoxConn which has greatly improved since.

      Captcha: Educates

    4. Re:What about other manufacturers? by BitZtream · · Score: 2

      You argument is that its okay for the other companies to be shitbags and treat people like disposable items and essentially kill them softly ... but the real crime is that Apple said they wouldn't allow it and they are?

      That is one fucked up view point you have there.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    5. Re:What about other manufacturers? by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 2

      It's irrelevant what the conditions on those other products are because the companies haven't shouted from the roof tops how much they are doing to prevent the situation

      So the fact that Forbes and other news agencies only mentioned Apple as "having slave labor camps" and not mentioning the thousands of other US companies using the same facilities, which required Apple to YET AGAIN go out of their way to try and improve conditions --- now leads to more responsibility on Apple's part because they've tried to improve conditions, they state on a web page that it's their intent (that's not really wanky advertising -- nobody finds that page unless they search for it).

      So fuck -- here we are with another story that ONLY mentions Apple and you have no problem with that, but it's still "all Apple" because they had to defend their reputation. WTF?

      Apple has no damn control in these factories other than moving their business. They have pressured to improve conditions -- but the workers are all clamoring to work at these factories and they fall asleep on other assembly lines. Why does it matter if it's an iPhone or a Sony Tablet?

      There's also a lot of smog in these worker districts. I think a lot more corporations need to step up and have standards. The only real way to improve worker conditions is to support tariffs on imports and labor unions -- but that's gone out of style in America.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    6. Re:What about other manufacturers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, for the sake of the argument, let's presume that Apple does indeed "advertise that it does better".

      Do you have any evidence that said claim is *wrong*? Since other companies, contracting labor out to those *same* factories, don't bother to put such stringent work-limit, or other safety-related requirements in their contracts, why do you assume that Apple's supposed claim is *wrong*, rather than acknowledging that the workers on other lines actually have it *worse*.

      (For example: Nobody working on Apple products threatened to commit mass suicide as part of their negotiation for better working conditions. That was folks on the XBox lines in the same factory complex.)

      Nowhere has Apple claimed that their measures are *perfect*. In fact, each year when they release the information about this sort of thing, there are a number of places where the measured failed, and the tell what added measures will be taken to improve things.

    7. Re:What about other manufacturers? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Yes exactly.

      If I go to China and get them to make me a widget most of the world won't care if it is using slave labour except for maybe a few of the usual organisations who like organising protests to keep their face in the media.

      If I go to China and get them to make me a widget, and then I proudly display prominent policies on my website about human rights and how people deserve proper working conditions, then rightfully the entire world should get pissed at Me and ONLY ME, if I and I ALONE am breaking MY OWN POLICY.

      If Apple has no control then they shouldn't pretend like they do. That's the fundamental problem here. We're holding Apple to their word, not generic manufacturer's to some generic human rights policy.

    8. Re:What about other manufacturers? by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      None of them are using Pegatron.

      Of them, at least Microsoft does use Pegatron (for their tablets). Also Dell and Sony manufacture there. And the rest of those listed have there own little "issues".

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    9. Re:What about other manufacturers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya, fuck those Chinks. Americans know best! Iraq is a utopia now thanks the USA! Go whites!

  17. Apple = Walmart of tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and the CEO enjoys dicks up his ass

    1. Re:Apple = Walmart of tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And there's nothing wrong with that.

  18. Re:And whose fault is this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    If you aren't a Randian Uberman, you are shit.
    Libertarian fantasy FTW!!!

  19. Pegatron vs Foxconn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I used to work in China, in tech business. I have been to several Pegatron's factories in China as well as to several Foxconn factories

    All the factories that I have visited are, to put it mildly, LABOR CAMPS

    But there is a difference

    The factories run by Foxconn, the condition has improved. While it's still "labor camp" like, at least it is humane --- and Foxconn having been scarred by the exposure (of suicides and whatnots) they are at least playing by the rules

    Not so in Pegatron factories

    Conditions there are way beyond inhumane. They lock workers inside a room, with few ventilation, and ask the worker to apply strong chemicals, chemicals that can destroy body cells if inhaled, that are carcinogenic, onto the devices that they are working on

    Many ex-workers from Pegatron develop all kinds of ailments after being exposed to those chemicals, and there have been numerous protest against Pegatron, in many Chinese cities

    I am not saying that Foxconn is an angel, no, they run labor camps as well. But at the very least, they are toeing the line, for the moment

    1. Re:Pegatron vs Foxconn by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      All the factories that I have visited are, to put it mildly, LABOR CAMPS

      No. There is one HUGE difference between these factories and a labor camp: In a labor camp, you can't say "I quit" and walk out.

    2. Re:Pegatron vs Foxconn by jrumney · · Score: 1

      In a labor camp, you can't say "I quit" and walk out.

      If I understand the situation correctly, workers from other provinces require a permit to live in a different part of China. And that permit is most likely tied to their employment. So it isn't the same as you or I walking out on our employer - the choice is made a lot more difficult for them.

    3. Re:Pegatron vs Foxconn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Conditions there are way beyond inhumane. They lock workers inside a room, with few ventilation, and ask the worker to apply strong chemicals, chemicals that can destroy body cells if inhaled, that are carcinogenic, onto the devices that they are working on

      Many ex-workers from Pegatron develop all kinds of ailments after being exposed to those chemicals, and there have been numerous protest against Pegatron, in many Chinese cities

      I'm not saying you're lying, but I don't think the BBC is totally incompetent to the extent to have missed conditions that a trained professional like yourself have witnessed.

      Also you like to identify these "strong carcinogenic chemicals"? Or is that another hazard that the chemically ignorant BBC team missed also?

    4. Re:Pegatron vs Foxconn by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Informative

      If I understand the situation correctly, workers from other provinces require a permit to live in a different part of China.

      No, this is wrong. No permit is required. If you move to a different province, you cannot use social services, such as hospitals, subsidized housing, and public schools, but you can live and work there. Use of the social services is NOT tied to employment. Instead rural workers just get screwed and there is nothing they, or their employer, can do about it. They pay taxes to support services they cannot use. Furthermore, this status is hereditary, so even if someone is born in the city, they still are considered "rural" if their grandparents lived in the countryside in 1949.

    5. Re:Pegatron vs Foxconn by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying you're lying ...

      I think it is safe to say he is lying. He is posting as an AC, and accusing Pegatron of blatantly committing felonies, in front of foreign witnesses, based on no evidence whatsoever. I don't think so. They may be evil, but they aren't stupid.

    6. Re:Pegatron vs Foxconn by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Why are you shilling for the Chinks?

      Pegatron is not a Chinese company.

    7. Re:Pegatron vs Foxconn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taiwan is part of China. 10,000 years of history can't be wiped away by a single revolution and military junta on the island, even when it tries to be less obvious.

    8. Re:Pegatron vs Foxconn by ultranova · · Score: 1

      There is one HUGE difference between these factories and a labor camp: In a labor camp, you can't say "I quit" and walk out.

      Sure you can. You'll be shot if you do, but that doesn't make you any deader than starving to death after walking out of these factories would.

      Rule people through direct violence, and you'll look like a villain. Rule people through only letting them eat if they do what you want, and you'll look like a good capitalist.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    9. Re:Pegatron vs Foxconn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taiwan is NOT a part of China. It's a separate country.

      Years of history are irrelevant. No one under 70 even remembers them being the same country. Soon, everyone who remembers it will be dead.

    10. Re:Pegatron vs Foxconn by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      Pegatron = Megatron?

      Perhaps this explains.

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    11. Re:Pegatron vs Foxconn by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      You'll be shot if you do

      Nobody in modern China has ever been shot for refusing to work in a foreign owned factory.

      starving to death after walking out of these factories would.

      You apparently know absolutely nothing about the labor market in Shenzhen. There are rows upon rows of factories, and ALL of them are hiring. Available workers are scarce, and wages are rising quickly. A worker can quit and find a new job as quickly as they can ride their bicycle to the next factory (about five minutes).

    12. Re:Pegatron vs Foxconn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      To add to this...

      You can use hospitals; you simply cannot use government-provided health insurance across provinces (Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen, and a few others have provincial-level status under a different label). So you pay out of pocket. This is what nearly all Chinese outside the government-employment system do anyway.

      And some forms of health insurance come with employment, regardless of where your legal residence is. Those are tied to where you employment is, however.

      For public schools, the most prestigious urban areas are piloting segregated schools - migrant worker students are in one section and native students in another. Of course the best schools are not pilots... I have no data on "average" cities though (which in China include dozens of 10million+ cities).

      Finally, there are more than a dozen forms of subsidized housing in major cities; these are all off limits to non-natives. However, many large cities run a mortgage-subsidy scheme where your employer helps you pay into a home-purchase fund (you can cash out at a loss if you want).

      The trick is that migrant workers - say in construction-related trades - will probably be sub-contracted and thus not fall under registered employment in the city in which they work (indeed many companies, say in Beijing, are registered to neighboring/surrounding Hebei province). So they cannot benefit from the mortgage-subsidy scheme, the local health insurance, etc.

      P.S.
      China's major problem here is that government financing is a massive game of push and pull between the layers of local government and the national government. The easiest form of central government largess is through state enterprises and debt. These vehicles tend to benefit state employees over private ones, infrastructure over social services, and local leaders over local citizens. So poor areas tend to starve and then get these stimulus-style injections. The hardest form of funding to get is a long-term national funding program, and once secured this tends to spread benefits thinly over a huge population/area, diminishing overall effect. Poor areas benefit marginally from these and they tend not to really turn anything around.

    13. Re:Pegatron vs Foxconn by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Taiwan is part of China. 10,000 years of history can't be wiped away

      Taiwan was not incorporated into China until 1683. From 1895 to 1945 it was Japanese, and from 1949 till today it was de facto independent. So it spent only about 200 years as part of China, not 10,000.

    14. Re:Pegatron vs Foxconn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an alcoholic, neoliberal cretin.

    15. Re:Pegatron vs Foxconn by Enfixed · · Score: 1

      *Woooooooooosh*

      --
      Sigs are bad for you...
    16. Re:Pegatron vs Foxconn by jrumney · · Score: 1

      No, this is wrong. No permit is required.

      Since 2003, you no longer get beaten to death in a jail cell for failing to show one on demand, and obtaining one is easier and less expensive, but the temporary urban residence permit still exists. It seems I was wrong about them being tied to employment though.

  20. My first question is... by vortex2.71 · · Score: 1

    In the interest of due diligence, I must ask whether Mike Daisey is behind this investigation?

  21. Does Samsung or Google have any influence? by Brannon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Most phones that are manufactured in these places are Android phones--yet we only here about Apple failing to protect workers. Cisco, Nintendo, Sony, Amazon, etc. all use these companies (Pegatron, Foxconn, etc.).

    But it's okay because those companies never pretended to try to enforce higher standards--that's what you're saying, right? with a straight face and everything.

    1. Re:Does Samsung or Google have any influence? by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      Most android phones are cheap (with some obvious exceptions that are a relatively small part of the market). People expect cheap products to be exploitative. When they pay more, they expect it to be less exploitative (even though in reality many expensive products are exploitative, like diamonds). As the by far most prominent expensive luxury phone, Apple naturally gets most of the flack. People see how much they're paying and the huge profit margins and feel that some of that profit should be used to better conditions, unlike a cheap phone where there's barely any profit margin.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    2. Re:Does Samsung or Google have any influence? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Samsung has had criticism as well. I believe LG does a lot of manufacturing on Korea where conditions are better.

      You are right that Apple does get singled out, but Apple is also the most expensive, highest profit margin and likes to promote its wholesome and ethical image. For example, Jobs wouldn't allow any adult content on the app store. Apple has said it will deal with this problem, but hasn't delivered on its promise. Criticism is fair.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:Does Samsung or Google have any influence? by BigZee · · Score: 1

      As pointed out several times already, this is being highlighted because Apple is on record for stating that they would not do business with companies using such abusive practices. I don't know if the other companies have made such statements or not. Even if they haven't it would not be unreasonable to highlight the abuses if they occur. However, to imply that the abuses reported by Panorama are in some way reduced because they do not also highlight the abuse of the other companies seems wrong to me.

    4. Re:Does Samsung or Google have any influence? by kuzb · · Score: 1

      If the article was about any of those companies I'd be decrying their actions too. Apple tried to make us believe they we going to do better and I think many of us believed that. They lied.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    5. Re:Does Samsung or Google have any influence? by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 1

      It's very likely Apple have the fattest margins and are therefore in a better position to effect change. Plus they're kind of trading on their "ethical" status.

      But I agree it's them (Apple) and everyone else who is to blame. The investigation is _perhaps_ unfair in that it doesn't even mention other manufacturers, but I don't think it's unreasonable to at least start with Apple. Maybe they're investigating them alphabetically?! :D

  22. The "worker standards" farce is obvious by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

    Apple is not the only one guilty of this, but it's more egregious in their case because they trade a lot on their luxury image.

    If companies cared about workers, they'd set up factories in countries were workers are actually protected by lax and practice. Apple especially have the profits to do so.

    They don't, and they don't. Let's just stop pretending the resulting product is glamorous.

    --
    The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    1. Re:The "worker standards" farce is obvious by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      Let's just stop pretending the resulting product is glamorous.

      Exactly. Both Android and Apple phone and tablet products are produced in sweatshops no Slashdotter would like to work in themselves, myself included.

      Apple and Android manufacturers can pay as much lip-service to worker rights as they want. Until they actually employ staff in Western countries they're just talking spin. They know damn well nobody could afford a current smartphone or tablet if Human labour exploitation in 3rd-world conditions wasn't a reality.

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
  23. Wow, you've really turned a mirror on all of us. by Brannon · · Score: 1

    and we are all humbled before your uncompromising integrity.

    Do you have a solution to the problem to propose?

  24. If the manufacturer added more value... by Brannon · · Score: 1

    then they could charge more for their services. If the company that designs and retails the product is getting overpaid for their value, then a competitor will undercut them and they'll lose in the market.

    That's how the free market works--no other economic system has ever come anywhere close to mimicking the efficiency of free-market capitalism (when there is actually competition as there obviously is in the electronics industry)--but hey, yeah, maybe you'll invent a new economic system within a Slashdot comment that'll change the world.

    The real problem here is that there are no laws preventing the exploitation of Chinese workers, or those laws are insufficiently enforced.

    1. Re:If the manufacturer added more value... by cryptolemur · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's the naive version of how "free market" works. In reality, since competition is not for the benefit of the companies, they do whatever it takes to not compete. Because in fully functional "free markets", it would be practically impossible to make profit, which means that the very driving force of the innovation and manufacture will diminish the better "free markets" work. The "free markets" will fail by design, by becoming unfree and uncompetitive.

      And competition is not, by definition, efficient. It's immense waste of time, effort and resources. What it produces, on the other hand, might sometimes appear to be efficiency, if look only at the winner. If you look at the whole picture, it would take some mind bending acrobatics to believe that having to write the same software for three different operating systems and three different phone platform is in any way efficient use of developers' skills, time and effort.

    2. Re:If the manufacturer added more value... by LessThanObvious · · Score: 1

      I'm a fan of the free market and not proposing a different economic system. I would just like to see ethical business practices all the way through the supply chain become a voluntary norm accepted and encouraged in the business community. My belief system just doesn't allow for exploiting anyone just because they are willing to be exploited.

  25. HEY! We're not paying you to sleep. by newbie_fantod · · Score: 1

    From TFA:
    Apple said it was a very common practice for workers to nap during breaks, but it would investigate any evidence they were falling asleep while working.

  26. Sounds about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Steve Jobs was (in real life, not in the Apple-fable), a right royal ass hole. Sure he made a crapload of money, and investors were happy, and yuppies love his big-boy-pants versions of the speak-and-spell (eg: ispeak, ispell), etc. But people who actually *worked* for Jobs? They though he was a ruthless asshole. And the Chinese factory workers are a reflection of Apple's corporate culture. Steve Jobs writ large. So now instead of being able to jump to their deaths, they have safety nets to catch despondent workers. Their last week's pay is deducted because they have to pay for use of the net (iNet), and they get a pink slip as soon as the guards pull them off of it. The guards are not allowed to shoot them even if they beg to be shot- bullets are expensive and messy. Not sure about bayonets though.

  27. 12 hours = cheaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I don't have any citations about what that AC said, but our company did tell us it is CHEAPER to pay us overtime and work us 12s than it is to hire a second shift and work both 8s. Not because of productivity or anything like that, but because they are only taxed and only have to contribute our medical insurance premiums for the regular hours. OT doesn't count. And no, I don't have any cites for that either. But I do recall hearing what the AC is referring to, maybe 10 years ago, but I don't remember where I heard it. Probably /.

  28. Your ONLY answer is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your 6 digit UID says you aren't new here, but your question certainly does. There is ONLY one answer: the investigator is CLEARLY Bennett Haselton!

  29. Re:And whose fault is this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This type of emotional counter response is what we vote up now to +5 guys? Shameful, even if you agree with the sentiment. We should be about discourse here, not laying emotional whackamole against each other, we are better than reddit.

  30. Re:And whose fault is this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is more of a problem of the Chinese government, which is the subject that is supposed to take care of its citizens than for Apple, but capitalism has been profiting from the week and unprotected long before Marx. The societies that have managed to build good living standards of living have long realized this is a problem and taken measures to correct it. Pity it doesn't work everywhere, mostly because greed goes well with paid 'free market' propaganda bullshit.

  31. Let's actually look at studies... by Firethorn · · Score: 4, Informative

    scholar.google.com if anybody's interested.

    Effects of scheduled overtime on labor productivity - Abstract says 'no significant effect on productivity'
    Productivity in manufacturing...: As hours/day dropped, they worked more days(of the year), so productivity remained about the same.
    Scheduled Overtime and Labor Productivity: Quantitative Analysis: Productivity drops 10-15% for 50/60 hour work weeks.
    Effect of Reducing Interns' Work Hours: Surprise, Surprise, NOT working medical interns for 24+ hours straight reduces serious medical errors by more than 50%.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  32. soo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... don't those same companies assemble things for other manufacturers as well?

  33. Re:Wow, you've really turned a mirror on all of us by Anonanonaon · · Score: 1

    There is no solution in a rigged economy.

    For a permanent, meaningful fix, you'd need to outlaw the following:

    1. Psychopaths holding positions of power and leadership.
    2. Usury and the global banking elite.

    Until then, all you can do on an individual level is make every choice you can to not play along. For computer equipment, buy used and learn how to repair it. It's not a perfect solution since no electronics are made without slaves, but it's better than Feeding the Beast directly. It honors the people who bled for your equipment by not throwing out their labor when it has lost its shine.

    For everything else, save up and pay for products you know are fairly traded. Yes, you'll pay ten times what you would at Walmart, but that's the choice. Live with less, use efficiently, and guess what? It's not as hard as it sounds, you'll actually be proud of your possessions.

  34. Apple a small portion of manufacturing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You would have to boycott HP, Amazon, Google, and just about every other computer/smartphone/device manufacturer. Not just Apple. Apple is a small part of the manufacturing taking place, even when you only consider those markets Apple is participating in.

    1. Re:Apple a small portion of manufacturing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But a boycott on Apple makes it keep its own promise to add those requirements during its negotiations with manufacturers. Also - Apple is the industry leader so what it does sets what suppliers do and what competitors must do to compete. All Apple needs to do is comply, then add some sign for workers rights to its products and others must follow or face less demand from savvy consumers.

  35. Re:Wow, you've really turned a mirror on all of us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That comment deserves a positive moderation.

  36. Meal breaks are generally state law ... by perpenso · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... I remember my GF [grandfather] telling me that 'every 4 hours, they are required to let us eat'. even today, at my 'cushy IT job' I don't get a food break every 4 hours ...

    You probably do. Its one of those things that moved from union contracts to state law. Read your employee handbook, it probably says something about mandatory breaks and mealtimes after fixed numbers of hours. Or read the mandatory state labor rules poster in the break room at work.

    if my GF was still alive, he'd be furious for the things he and his peers fought for and yet we let drift away over the years.

    My grandfather's working days began a little later than yours, late 1920s. Blue collar union jobs from the late 1930s until retirement in the 70s. The way he explained it to me is that unions were less important today because the things the unions fought for back in the day are generally in the law now. So we're protect by law not union contract now. That the things his union fought for in the 60s and 70s, and that he went on strike over (reluctantly), were largely BS and they lost money by striking. The additional benefits, relative to the offer on the table before going on strike, never making up for the lost wages. That it was just politics and posturing of the union, and the union looking out for the union organization not the workers they represented. Every union is different but his was a very large well known union so I think his story may be more of the norm not the exception.

    After 30 years working in software development I've not seen a return to the bad old days as you suggest. Never had an employer that didn't recognize breaks and meals. About all you could say is that it was left to you, no manager was clocking you in and out. Certainly no manager was upset when you disappeared for half an hour and reappeared with a soft drink cup from a local fast food joint in your hand. The only time my managers ever cared was after a bogus complaint to the state by a disgruntled former employee, yes myself and coworkers thought the complaint bogus. Then managers were all annoying asking if you've been working four hours yet and haven't taken a meal break. They didn't care if you were in the flow coding and not hungry yet and wanted to continue for another hour before grabbing a bite, they had to interrupt you. And if you really wanted to stress them out say you brought a sandwich and wanted to eat at your desk while you worked. Losing the flexibility to take a meal at 3 to 5 hours of work depending on your focus and/or your hunger did not improve things.

    The closest you could get to the bad old days was that we were salary and didn't get paid overtime. However at the one company where we put in a ton of overtime we got pretty decent bonuses that made up for it. Now are all companies decent in this manner, no, certainly not. But as "white collared" salaried employees things were not that different from the old strong union days. Want to talk about unpaid overtime, talk to an uncle who worked on the space program in the 50s and 60s. Of course in their mind they were on a holy crusade and happy to do it, even more so than a recent college grad offered a job at a video game company.

    1. Re:Meal breaks are generally state law ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you have to admit that things have gotten worse. People who shouldn't be salaried are salaried and expected to work longer hours. H1-b has basically gutted entry level IT jobs. The one thing that really bothers me is the whole retirement thing. When I first started working, most companies provided a defined benefit package or a pension. Then the 401k was introduced. It was great. Companies matched dollar for dollar up to 5% of your pay. Then it was reduced to $.50 on the dollar up to 5%. The last company I worked for offered 50% of the first 1% of your contribution (that's how the wrote it in the manual).

      Thing might not be as bad as the 1930s, but I see companies cutting back on benefits. They're just a better at portraying it like it's not a cutback.

    2. Re:Meal breaks are generally state law ... by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 2

      After 30 years working in software development I've not seen a return to the bad old days as you suggest.

      Well, I suppose if things are good for you then the problem is solved for all time.

      Union negotiated rules are laws means you've got benefits on the backs of the efforts of others -- you're welcome. The fact that a lot of hourly employees at blue collar jobs work unpaid hours due to task quotas is also not your problem.

      As soon as some Jim Crow Laws were repealed in red states because "we didn't need them any more" -- lawmakers went about abusing the election system before the ink was dry.

      There is so much that is getting worse for workers and most people I know don't think their kids will have more opportunity than them. Have you heard some Republicans leaders talk about repealing certain labor laws because we don't need them any more? Probably not your problem.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    3. Re:Meal breaks are generally state law ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not as bad as the bad old days, but we're quickly sliding in that direction. Wage theft is a real, persistent, and grossly underreported problem.

      In this country EVERY tech worker I've spoken too has experienced one or more of the following:

      Being made to work through lunches and other breaks.
      Uncompensated overtime
      Unpaid overtime
      Working more than 40 hours a week but not being paid for only 40
      Being salaried, but worked so many hours they effectively make far below industry standards and in some case less than minimum wage.

      There is a sick culture of exploitation where businesses and managers paint the above scenarios as normalized. In all but the most severe and notorious cases involving hundreds of workers you see little-to-no legal action.

      Like it or not, that sweat shop in China is your employer's ideal scenario. You work for an organization that amorally works to extract as much value from you with as little compensation as it can get away with. (All in the name of the almighty shareholder) If you let them walk all over you, pass laws they want, elect politicians they want. That is your future. A life of toil in exchange for abject poverty.

      Organized labor is how you push back.

      I have little respect for people that don't stand up for themselves.

    4. Re:Meal breaks are generally state law ... by perpenso · · Score: 1

      Its not just me. It all the other developers and IT folks I have worked with and all the companies they have worked at. I know no one who was denied meal breaks and other basic worker rights, with the exception of paid overtime due to a salary pay scheme. Have there been bosses who were a-holes, sure, that too. Might an a-hole somewhere have violated a labor law, sure. But that is the occasional anomaly not some sort of general rollback of worker rights to pre-union days, and such anomalies are easily handled by state labor boards.

      I agree with my 40+ year union veteran grandfather. Unions once did very important work, but those battles are over and won. There are no serious efforts to roll back basic worker rights to pre union days. Unless one misrepresents the limits on collective bargaining by government employees. As even FDR admitted government employees are in a very different and special position compared to industrial workers and the same rights and methods should not apply. Are there unresolved issues that unions could help resolve, sure. But such unresolved issues do not change the fact that many big issues are resolved and resolved by a much higher authority, government.

      Its quite legitimate for people to fear a decline in the quality of living in the future but that is not due to lower union participation. It is due to governmental policies that foster the outsourcing of jobs overseas. Its not that workers are in general losing protections that were union issues a century ago. Its that workers are losing good factory and industrial jobs.

      Or to put things simply. Given that unions won the big "battles" its natural that their "army" scale down in size and only find itself fighting small skirmishes. Again I reference my grandfather who was a 40+ year worker enrolled (1930s-70s) in a rather large and well known union. In his opinion the union was once important but "today" (1970s) its just a racket to collect dues and perpetuate itself, to serve itself, not to serve its member workers, not to maintain levels of worker tradecraft and skill. I had friend who worked at a small and very profitable corrugated paper container manufacturer in the 2000s. She said the owner and floor manager were pretty flexible, reasonable and fair with the workers. But a union organizer came by and convinced them to organize, they unionized, came under the umbrella of one of the large and well known organizations. And the flexible environment they previously enjoyed was replaced with a bureaucratic and micromanaged environment. The bonuses and other extra benefits they once received were replaced with a boilerplate contract negotiated far away and long ago. The workers on the floor quickly came to the opinion that they were lied to and screwed and regretted unionizing. Many who voted to unionize were saying they would vote to de-unionize as soon as the law allowed them to do so. Unionizing is no panacea. Its a myth to think it always improves things. In an anomalous abusive situation it might help workers to organize. Should they join a big well known union in such a situation, possibly not. They might be better served by a small and regional organization, a more local effort. Assuming of course that their grievances can't be resolved by the state labor board.

    5. Re:Meal breaks are generally state law ... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Hi! I've never been made to work through breaks. I have at times not taken them, but that was voluntary. Being personally driven to figure out why the bug reporting system doesn't work is not the same as being told to work straight through.

      I have worked uncompensated and unpaid overtime. In most of my jobs, I was paid for 40 hours a week, regardless of what hours I worked. (In another job, I found I minded overtime a lot less when my meter was still running.) As a general rule, I was not ordered to work overtime, but did it voluntarily. Now, from the employer's point of view it's very convenient to have an employee who takes company goals and efforts personally, but I accept responsibility for my voluntary actions.

      I have never worked enough unpaid overtime in a year to make my annual salary unduly low. (This is not true of weekly salary.)

      All my jobs that have paid me $1K or greater, over the course of my lifetime, have been technical and related in some way to computers.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    6. Re:Meal breaks are generally state law ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Things are tougher but offshoring jobs and H1Bs have more to do with government mismanagement of trade relations than anything else. And some of the cutting back is due to increased competition. And some of the cutting back, especially at the large international corps, has to do with decades old mismanagement. For example those generous pensions you mentioned ... those pensions were part of a strategy, delayed compensation. In order to get lower wages today I'll give you more generous retirement benefits many decades in the future. Well part of the reason some US companies are so uncompetitive now is that the bill has come due for those pensions from the 1970s and earlier. Basically the CEOs of the 50s-70s shifted some of their costs to the 1980s-2010s, sucks for recent CEOs and employees but that's not a problem for the 50s-70s CEOs, they made their quarterly reports look good and today's problems are not their problems.

    7. Re:Meal breaks are generally state law ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You list 5 grievances and 4 of them are the exact same issue. Unpaid overtime for salaried employees. Its a real problem, but its pretty much the main, as in pretty much the only, large scale problem with respect to worker abuse. Other legit grievances are really part of government mismanagement of trade relations.

      Your claim that unions are the solution is absolutely false. If you are not being paid overtime, if you are misclassified as a salaried employee, the solution is to call your state labor board. The problems are solved by the law, not union contracts.

  37. Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's an endless supply of Chinese, just like there's an endless supply of iPhones.

  38. Re:Wow, you've really turned a mirror on all of us by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 2

    For computer equipment, buy used and learn how to repair it. It's not a perfect solution since no electronics are made without slaves, but it's better than Feeding the Beast directly. It honors the people who bled for your equipment by not throwing out their labor when it has lost its shine.

    That's pure whitewashing. Like saying that if you don't buy endangered species souvenirs directly from the poacher makes it okay.

    --
    Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  39. Re: And whose fault is this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless systemd is the topic, then Slashdot turns into a shitfest of backwards ideology.

  40. I have reason to post as AC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Do you realize how big these mega-factories are?

    Some of them function much more like a town than factories and how much time did BBC spend inside Pegatron's factories? Did BBC get to go everywhere?

    My time spend inside both Foxconn's factories and the ones belonging to Pegatron I spend month inside, yes, months , and we didn't even go outside until our projects were completed

    With the months I stayed inside, I get to go to many corners, sometime accompanied by factory staffs, sometime I went alone and in there I found large rooms emitting very strong solvent odors and seeing through the glass doors (walking through the corridors) I saw sometimes 20, sometimes 50, sometimes over 200 people working inside those rooms

    Even in the corridors the odors of those strong solvent was already nauseating enough, can you imagine working inside those rooms?

    Furthermore most of those rooms were not equipped with ventilation vents, or windows or anything that can vent out those chemicals

    Of course you can call me a liar, that's your pejorative, but it's way too easy to do name calling here while people's lives, even if those lives are of the Chinese (maybe their lives are "cheap" in your view), are at stake

    1. Re:I have reason to post as AC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey let's do this AC.
      Since your authenticity is under scrutiny, you can answer a few questions about your claims.
      If you don't respond with some convincing answers, you might just be bullshiting.

      Do you realize how big these mega-factories are?

      Well roughly how big are the factories? ft^2 or m^2
      You were there for "months", you should have a rough idea.

      How about the exact addresses of the locations of your assignments that you were there for "months"?
      I'm expecting "several" here that you claimed.

      While we're at it, what did you do (roughly) , that required "months" of lockup?

      Of course you can call me a liar, that's your pejorative

      I'm guessing they didn't hire you for your mastery of the English language.

  41. Re:BBC should tale a good look at itself first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you're saying that because the management and directors are arseholes, it doesn't matter what the reporters find out?

  42. If the manufacturer added more value... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is the second part, there are laws with stiff penalties against exploitation of workers in China.
    However it is often the west that has to get the Chinese authorities to enforce them.

  43. Re:BBC should tale a good look at itself first by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

    Yep, the BBC is a single homogeneous unit, so the higher ups protecting Saville during his active years 20 years ago or whatever are EXACTLY the same people as those doing the investigation. On that note we should arrest the geniuses at the local Apple store for human rights abuses because they are clearly the same people.

    Not to mention their disgraceful one side coverage of the Scottish referendum on Independence this year have left many like myself really not giving much of a shit as to what they have to "report" these days.

    Well, Salmond's ludicrous wishlist er, I mean plan for independence was fatally flawed in many ways. The thing is the case against was mostly "the case for is really flawed". Which was true. But yeah, journalists should give equal weight to each sides. Teach the controversy!

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  44. In related news... by tlambert · · Score: 1

    In related news... Apple is continuing to deny responsibility for space junk launched into space by Boeing, which is known to use Apple products, and has repeatedly dodged questions about their sole responsibility for the existence of Somali pirates, who are known to have held hostage container ships containing one or more containers of Apple products, among the many thousands of containers aboard.

    Oh. I'm sorry... weren't we playing the "Blame Apple for the actions of other people" game?

    1. Re:In related news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is commonplace for US manufacturers to require their contracted facilities overseas to meet standards for ethics. treatment of workers, and environmental impact. The fact that Apple has such low standards to begin with, and doesn't even enforce them, should be bothersome.

      My company has walked away from China over these issues and moved production back to the US over the last three years, mainly over issues of labor treatment.

      I think the straw that broke the camel's back was when one of our products failed incoming inspection, and when we opened it up, there was a finger inside. The worker literally lost a finger during the production of one of our products.

    2. Re:In related news... by tlambert · · Score: 1

      It is commonplace for US manufacturers to require their contracted facilities overseas to meet standards for ethics. treatment of workers, and environmental impact. The fact that Apple has such low standards to begin with, and doesn't even enforce them, should be bothersome.

      Short of stationing an observer in every room of a factory floor room currently being used to manufacture Apple products, there's no way to do this short of spot checks, with the hope that the translators and government assigned handlers are not in the pay of the factory operator, and don't "phone ahead" so that these audit come out clean. Frankly, given that changing configuration between "unclean" and "clean", and then back to "unclean", would likely be prohibitively expensive, so as long as the spot checks are ongoing, the conditions are going to be the best that you can hope for, and still be in China.

      My company has walked away from China over these issues and moved production back to the US over the last three years, mainly over issues of labor treatment.

      I think the straw that broke the camel's back was when one of our products failed incoming inspection, and when we opened it up, there was a finger inside. The worker literally lost a finger during the production of one of our products.

      I think if they were finding fingers in products during servicing or inspection (which in the U.S., for Apple, is contracted out to Solectron), there would be hell to pay, so I'll take that particular story as anecdotal/apocryphal, unless you can cite a news story to that effect.

      Walking away from China manufacturing is generally not an option, when the cost per unit quality of, say, U.S. workers, prices them very much out of the range of possibility. If Apple were to wholesale drop Chinese manufacturing as an option (as you say your company has done), obviously, the COGS would go up, and with it, the cost to the consumer for the product. The factories would be relocated elsewhere to either some other Southeast Asia country, or to Eastern Europe (which is where iPhones are put through final manufacture so that it takes place in the EU and therefore avoids the non-EU product import VAT that would otherwise be charged as a protectionist measure by the EU).

      Either way, if you expect those jobs to come back to the U.S. without a change in MFN status for China, and a change in international tariff structures to enforce U.S. environmental and labor policy on trading partners facilities used to manufacture goods sold in the U.S., as Steve Jobs told Obama: "Those jobs are gone; they're not coming back".

      Even were they to come back under those circumstances, they would be coming back to automated factories in non-union states, so those jobs are effectively gone forever, either way.

      If we suddenly froze trade relations with China, it would have the same effect: the closes you could expect those jobs to come to a U.S. worker would be the Maquiladoras, which, economically speaking, pay about 25% of a Mexican living wage for supporting a family, which is significantly less, in terms of subsistence, than the Chinese workers in Shenzhen are getting, which is a significant surplus over 200% of what it takes to support a family on a workers wages.

      Find all the fingers you want, those jobs will never be U.S. jobs again.

  45. Re:Wow, you've really turned a mirror on all of us by Anonanonaon · · Score: 1

    That's pure whitewashing. Like saying that if you don't buy endangered species souvenirs directly from the poacher makes it okay.

    It's not perfect, as I already said, but it's the best one can do short of not using a computer at all, which isn't really an option today. But it's also not pure whitewashing. It's certainly better than thoughtlessly upgrading every time the whim hits.

    How long have you been running your computer? My newest is 10 years old and I've learned how to service it myself. I'm keeping as much of my cash out of the slave trade as can be reasonably achieved. If everybody did the same, (and that's quite possible given the huge amount of old hardware floating around), Foxcon would have to close its doors.

  46. FTFY:You have selected to Boycott the Poor...... by retroworks · · Score: 1

    Listen, I hesitate to post this. I'm friends with a lot of antiglobalists and absolute believe you mean well. But exaggerating an perpetuating racial stereotypes, and pretending that Chinese (and African and other non-OECD) consumers are not the PRIMARY beneficiaries of the industrial revolution ignores history by pretending language and race make our own industrial adolescence unique.

    "You have chosen to rationalize non-tariff trade barriers to free employment of Chinese workers, probably to protect markets for a product you or your employer couldn't manufacture affordably enough for world (e.g. Chinese) consumers to buy and share your pleasant lifestyle. Your rationalization is characterized by one or more of the following possible memes;

    [_] Calling engineers and employees of Chinese ODM factory "Chinese peasants"

    [_] iPhones/Pads would cost too much for Chinese, Indian, and other emerging consumers if I had to pay my fellow wealthy citizens to make them

    [_] iPhones employment/affluence overseas will not evolve the environmental regulations the industrial revolution caused me to vehemently insist for myself

    [X] All the other progressive claiming manufacturers are using racial #whitesaviorcomplex memes too

    [_] Some/Many/Most Chinese workers appreciate shrinking 40 hour weeks, quintupling of pay, and breathing their own consumption's aluminum dust

    [X] It's not Foxconn, it's Apple

    [_] It's not the Chinese government, it's Apple

    [_] They (ODMs like Foxconn) should use their engineering degrees to continuously redesign products they patented if they don't like it

    [_] OMG It's capitalism at work!

    [_] OMG It's communism at work!

    [_] My crass generalizations about "disposable workers" are paid applied to Apple disposable workers than my nation's agriculture and food (apple) harvesting

    [_] Apple's auditors didn't prove a negative, that Mike Daisy's fictitious serious issues might not apply anyplace they didn't audit

    [_] Five years ago, thanks to Taiwanese engineering firms like Foxconn, the Chinese who worked in Shenzhen were too wealthy to exploit

    [_] My Android is Foxconn too

    [_] I'm an Apple hater using Apple as a scapegoat

    [_] I also work 60/80/100/120 hour weeks at my IT job

    [_] Apple designers are in Taipei and Vancouver

    [_] Every sanctimonious protectionist colonial power did the same thing to every successfully emerging market

    [_] China outlawed slavery too.

    [_] The Chinese manufacturers have no prison labor today

    [_] It's up to the Chinese to stand up to their oppressive government

    [_] There are lines of willing workers trying to do my job, better than I do, at Foxconn factories

    [_] If any company were to stop hyperbolizing the exploitation, I really think it'll be Apple

    [_] My affordable Chinese hardware runs on Android and Linux, and its white box OEMs made computers too affordable to the masses

    [_] Foxconn workers think they have it great, but it's no ok until Anti-globalists say so!

    [_] Foxconn worker suicide rate is lower than Chicago's suicide rate

    [_] China's worker homicide rate is lower than Chicago's homicide rate

    [_] If poor people get to use the same devices the wealthy use, it can pollute the whole world!

    [_] Half of all Chinese households have an Foxconn product

    [_] If they develop emerging cities like Shenzhen, I'll have no anti-globalist #whitesaviorcomplex causes to champion

    [_] The falsely claimed high incidence of suicides didn't get the insurance money for hyperbolized suicide claims

    [_] You can afford to read from a macbook/iphone/ipad right now

    [_] When I post about suicide nets on American bridges, it's less exotic and altruistic sounding

    [_] I'm writing to Interns in the US who don't get paid to make them think it's because of immigrant farm workers and engineers in Taipei and Hong Kong

    [_] By merely suggesting the inference that some high tech Chinese factories beat the wo

    --
    Gently reply
  47. But it technically isnt 'slave labor' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Im sure that will be the next statement from the Apple management team.

    SO Apple Fanbois, how does it feel that your "Gold Plated Turd" is the product of abused workers??

    Of course you dont care.

  48. The criticism is fundamentally dishonest. by Brannon · · Score: 2

    You and everyone else knows it--the mental contortions required by Android fans to criticize Apple for something that is worse in Android-land is transparent and ridiculous.

    1. Re:The criticism is fundamentally dishonest. by Burz · · Score: 1

      What's ridiculous is thinking Android users don't have a choice when it comes to ethics... http://www.fairphone.com/

      At least it is something. And while you're reading that page I'd like to remind you of Apple's position as the both the largest and /richest/ smartphone vendor.

    2. Re:The criticism is fundamentally dishonest. by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      What's ridiculous is thinking Android users don't have a choice when it comes to ethics... http://www.fairphone.com/

      Well, sure. You can buy a phone with a high price, low specs, and long shipping times. 20,000 people have done so far.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    3. Re:The criticism is fundamentally dishonest. by Burz · · Score: 1

      You obviously didn't read the website.

      But I get your reasoning... Shiny pocket computers are more important than dealing with servitude.

    4. Re:The criticism is fundamentally dishonest. by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      You obviously didn't read the website.

      But I get your reasoning... Shiny pocket computers are more important than dealing with servitude.

      I don't have to read the whole website to see that all I said was correct. What is your fucking point anyway? That you are morally superior to me because you have a fair phone - no wait, you said you could get one if you wanted to.

      Me, I don't have any shiny pocket computers unlike you hypocrite. Fuck you.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    5. Re:The criticism is fundamentally dishonest. by Burz · · Score: 1

      You obviously didn't read the website.

      But I get your reasoning... Shiny pocket computers are more important than dealing with servitude.

      I don't have to read the whole website to see that all I said was correct.

      My hero!!! His Xray vision even works over the Internet.

      What is your fucking point anyway? That you are morally superior to me because you have a fair phone - no wait, you said you could get one if you wanted to.

      My point (if you read it) is that choices exist out there that the Android market at least makes possible.
       
       

      Me, I don't have any shiny pocket computers unlike you hypocrite. Fuck you.

      You presume too much, kemosabe... I'm going on 8 years with the same dumb-phone now.

    6. Re:The criticism is fundamentally dishonest. by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      You presume too much, kemosabe... I'm going on 8 years with the same dumb-phone now.

      By Nokia, the company with a worse track record than Apple? Figures.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    7. Re:The criticism is fundamentally dishonest. by Burz · · Score: 1

      Well clearly nothing is good enough for you. Try making your criticism constructive sometime.

    8. Re:The criticism is fundamentally dishonest. by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Fine, Buy Apple, they at least try to change things without delivering a sub par product.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  49. You are overwhelmingly wrong. by Brannon · · Score: 1

    Competition benefits the consumer directly. Free-market capitalism is not equivalent to unconstrained (i.e. stupid) libertarianism--it only works properly with laws/regulations setting boundaries. Laws need to: (a) prevent the abuse of monopolies, (b) protect workers, (c) prevent collusion, and (d) ensure some limited monopoly on new technology to create an incentive for R&D.

    There are some industries where the laws aren't working properly or the nature of the industry prevents competition (like cable tv providers)--the competition in electronics works perfectly--what is failing in the electronics industry is the 'laws protecting workers' part.

  50. CORRECTION: China allows awful working conditions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not Apple, it's China. How the hell can Apple dictate any more than they already have? They have an ethical responsibility, of course, but they are inspecting facilities, they are writing ethical behaviors into contracts, they are threatening legal action... what more can a company do???
    Do you really think that GM or Ford ever did this for their factory workers?
    Of course not! Why do you think unions exist?
    Are there unions in China? Of course not... but why do you think that is?
    China.

  51. Two Sides . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple *IS* doing something about it. They *DO* have strict rules regarding supplier conditions. They *DO* audit them. There *HAS BEEN* penalties levied. They *HAVE ALREADY* elevated conditions, some, in China.

    1) No, Apple hasn't done anything to anyone
    2) Apple TECHNICALLY doesn't have to
    3) Everyone else is doing it
    4) It's not right that this happens
    5) Someone should do something about this
    6) Apple HAS done something about this
    7) We are not there yet
    8) Apple SHOULD continue
    9) Pressure others to do the same

    I don't get the FUD on both sides of the aisle. I don't get the anti-Apple fervor. They were dead last in green products, until they decided not to be. They were NEVER the worst with labor conditions (that I've seen written) but they WERE the first ones to push for it.

    Get a grip people.

  52. Is this actually effective? by schweini · · Score: 1

    Is this kind of abuse actually effective? European (and maybe American) companies and policymakers often insist that giving workers time off and treating them decently actually increases overall productivity, so does anyone know of studies if this would be true in this case, too?

    1. Re:Is this actually effective? by garote · · Score: 1

      The vast size of the available labor pool greatly reduces the positive benefits that China's factory managers might gain from better treatment of the workers they currently have. They can work them into a stupor and then kick them out for a fresh new batch. The overhead to retrain is quite low in most positions.

  53. Re:Wow, you've really turned a mirror on all of us by Burz · · Score: 1

    Do you have a solution to the problem to propose?

    Fairphone for starters:

    http://www.fairphone.com/