Slashdot Mirror


Russia Plans To Build World First DNA Databank of All Living Things

An anonymous reader writes Researchers from Moscow State University plan to build a database that will house the DNA of every creature known to man. The University has secured a $194 million grant for the project dubbed "Noah's Ark." The gigantic "ark," set to be completed by 2018, will be 430 sq km in size, built at one of the university's central campuses. "It will enable us to cryogenically freeze and store various cellular materials, which can then reproduce. It will also contain information systems. Not everything needs to be kept in a petri dish," MSU rector Viktor Sadivnichy says.

83 comments

  1. I'm onto your game! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    We can't let Putin send out the first galactic seed ships! We need to dedicate ourselves to spreading our precious bodily fluids all across the universe before the Commies beat us to it!

    1. Re:I'm onto your game! by 4444444 · · Score: 0

      4 Great justice !
       
        Take off every Zig!

      --

      http://Lenny.com
      4 great justice!
    2. Re:I'm onto your game! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We need to dedicate ourselves to spreading our precious bodily fluids all across the universe

      Don't worry about my bedroom. I've got it covered.

    3. Re:I'm onto your game! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL Hilarious!

  2. $194 million by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    So 78 sextillion rubles then?

    1. Re:$194 million by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So 78 sextillion rubles then?

      I hear Anna Chapman is the portrait on that denomination...

    2. Re:$194 million by Rei · · Score: 3, Funny

      You took too long to post, it's up to 79 sextillion now. No wait, 80.

      --
      I am a proud traitor to my species in alliance with my mother the Earth in opposition to those who would destroy her.
    3. Re:$194 million by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So 78 sextillion rubles then?

      I hear Anna Chapman is the portrait on that denomination...

      More like 69 sextillion.

    4. Re: $194 million by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know that the ruble has retraced its December losses, right? Their central bank was able to intervene effectively, so the jokes are out of date now. Laughing at Putin's need to be perceived as hypermasculine, of course, never grows old, but the Russian central bank is not a laughing matter.

    5. Re: $194 million by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russia's central bank is pretty much tapped out at this point. The ruble is holding on because Putin's been pressuring the kleptocrats to hold their rubble...er, rubles...but that won't last long. They'll tire of his shit and make an offer to the KGB he can't match, so barring a spike in oil price he'll have an accident sometime before the end of 2015.

    6. Re: $194 million by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Yeah. They totally got it back under 50 sextillion!

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    7. Re: $194 million by Rei · · Score: 1

      The ruble retracted its december losses (but only its december losses) by the central bank:

      1) Throwing the Russian economy to the wolves, via raising the prime rate to a staggering 17%
      2) Starting a new wave of dumping massive quantities of their reserve funds onto the open market, hastening the funds' demise
      3) Forcing exporters to swap their foreign currency for rubles, thus putting them at greater risk for defaulting on their foreign debts

      How long do you think *any* of these can last, much less all three?

      --
      I am a proud traitor to my species in alliance with my mother the Earth in opposition to those who would destroy her.
    8. Re:$194 million by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $194 million sounds about right. I've been trying to get a startup non profit going to sequence all known cellular life - the total pricetag would be around $9 billion given current technology but $194 million for sample acquisition and cryogenic storage is pretty much correct (though it would assume pretty cheap sample acquisition - probably cheaper than required for their project considering they probably want eggs and semen instead of just any sample).

  3. In soviet russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ark builds you!

  4. Kind of big by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    430 sq km? That is a square 20 km on a side. Kind of big, don't you think?

    1. Re:Kind of big by Layzej · · Score: 1

      For comparison: (300 cubits) * (50 cubits) * (30 cubits) = 4.30 × 10-5 km^3 ;)

    2. Re:Kind of big by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 4, Funny

      Refrigerated storage of samples? They'll probably just a build a wall around a 430 km^2-sized area in Northern Siberia and call it a day. ;-)

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    3. Re:Kind of big by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, no, no...

      you have to use units, that the ****** author is familiar with:

      430 sq km (166 sq miles) is a square with side of 12.88 miles

      But, I guess, the author, who works for Putin (via rt.com) is by definition strange...

    4. Re:Kind of big by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's probably in the middle of nowhere. Only a small portion of that 430 km^2 area will house buildings:

      $194 million / 430 km^2 = $0.45 / m^2

      Or maybe the author's math is completely off.

    5. Re:Kind of big by unixisc · · Score: 1

      I'd think that real estate, of all things, would be the last of issues in Russia. However, I'd imagine it might do them good to make this in Siberia, instead of Muscovy - less of that $194M needs to go into just buying the real estate.

  5. Lost in translation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    430 square kilometers?

    1. Re:Lost in translation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'll bet the figure was 430,000 sq m and some bright journalist decided that he could save space by replacing three zeros with a "k".

  6. Obligatory SMBC by mentil · · Score: 0
    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
  7. You'll never get me, Russia! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'll never get me, Russia!

  8. Kinda Like Cryogenesis for Humans ... by machineghost · · Score: 2

    "It will enable us to cryogenically freeze and store various cellular materials, which can then reproduce."

    But they don't actually have the technology to do that, right? So isn't this the same thing as humans cryogenicaly freezing themselves now, blindly assuming that future scientists will be able to remove anti-freeze from their veins?

    In other words, isn't this giant expensive project entirely predicated on the the development of future technology that can actually use these samples, without any guarantee whatsoever that that technology will materialize?

    1. Re:Kinda Like Cryogenesis for Humans ... by alexander_686 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It depends on what you mean be "reproduce".

      If you are talking about having babies, the technology is science fiction, but near science fiction – not far science fiction like cryogenic freezing people. For example, synthetic life is a viable field of study. We can build bacterium from scratch. We are a long distance from resurrecting mastodons – which we have the DNA for. However the issues we face are known. To reach cryogenics we face many unknown hurdles. That is blue sky territory.

      However, "reproduce" could mean reading and understanding the DNA of creatures, a much lower and viable hurdle. Sequencing unknown genomes is expensive but the cost is falling fast. There are many species on the verge of extinction. Better to collect the samples know and sequence latter.

    2. Re:Kinda Like Cryogenesis for Humans ... by rednip · · Score: 1

      Actually, we freeze human eggs (sometimes even fertilized) all the time these days. Seeds of plant are also frozen and the later planted. The only real 'trick' is to have a place to properly grow them. If an animal species is completely wiped out, it might be hard to find a good host to carry it to term, so an incubator might need to be developed, but it does mitigate the genetic problems that come from a small surviving group.

      --
      The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
    3. Re:Kinda Like Cryogenesis for Humans ... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      We can build bacterium from scratch.

      We can take piles of elements and combine them into a living bacterium? I didn't think were were to that yet. We use viruses to splice in genes to make modifications, but can't "create" much of anything at this point.

    4. Re:Kinda Like Cryogenesis for Humans ... by alexander_686 · · Score: 1

      We can't build the cells yet but we can build and insert the complete genome into a bacterium.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S...

    5. Re:Kinda Like Cryogenesis for Humans ... by delt0r · · Score: 1

      We can build bacterium from scratch.

      No we can't. Not even close.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    6. Re:Kinda Like Cryogenesis for Humans ... by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      Depends what you mean by "from scratch".

      http://singularityhub.com/2010...

      To me, that qualifies as "from scratch", justified in the same manner that I justify people saying they made a pizza "from scratch" using store-bought tomatoes and mozzarella.

    7. Re:Kinda Like Cryogenesis for Humans ... by delt0r · · Score: 1

      Err no. It is like starting with a finished pizza and taking off a few toppings, then claiming you made a pizza from scratch. I do work in the field. This is nothing more than a "knockout" bacteria, where they started with a bacteria. It is not anyones definition of "from scratch". Even worse it was trial and error on what bits to keep, so it is still not even all that well understood.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
  9. Russia Plans To Build World First DNA Databank of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All Living Things. And then Putin will annex them.

  10. Jurassic World, Russian Edition. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dis is going to be like my Russian girlfriend: part habit, part fear, all regret.

    1. Re:Jurassic World, Russian Edition. by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

      That's what you get for sleeping next to a bear.

  11. Kinda Like Cryogenesis for Humans ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's one thing to cryogenically freeze a single cell or a group of cells (e.g. CHO Cells in DMSO), but a completely different thing to freeze an entire body.

  12. For zee vodka, komrade!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They secretly replaced the genes that produce sweat with genes that produce vodka. Soon everyone will attempt to ride tigers, wrestle bears and become topless in all their photos!!!

  13. They won't build shit by melted · · Score: 1, Informative

    In Russia, at least 2/3rds of all money gets stolen outright on any project like this (and the rest gets similarly picked apart by subcontractors until nothing is left). This is nothing but a front to pilfer government money. Nothing to see here, move along.

    1. Re:They won't build shit by bloodhawk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The same happens the world over. this isn't unique to russia

    2. Re:They won't build shit by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, government pilfers you. Seems like a trend.

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    3. Re:They won't build shit by melted · · Score: 1

      What's unique to Russia is the sheer scale and brazenness of theft. No one is even trying to hide it, and it goes all the way to the top. Putin was exporting 30% of Russia's oil through a firm owned by his old friend. I very much doubt he was doing it out of the kindness of his heart.

      It is not a coincidence that Russia consistently comes in at the bottom of the list in the various corruption ratings. And it's not a coincidence that their economy turns to shit every time oil takes a nosedive. It doesn't take a genius to run a country when you get $200B a year in oil profits, even if you steal two thirds of it right off the bat. It does take a modicum of competence to run a country without that, but with an elite so corrupt and so entrenched, Russia's only hope is that oil returns to $100+/bbl sometime soon. Which it probably won't for another couple of years.

    4. Re:They won't build shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same happens in the US, look at the backgrounds of any of the Politicians, They direct government contracts to businesses they have a vested interest in or ones that promise them something after they leave office. They have boards of directors earning millions where most of the time all they do to earn it is have there name listed on that board, they pay each other huge consultancy fees. Maybe it isn't as outright obvious as Russia but it is just as corrupt if not more so.

    5. Re:They won't build shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? How about those 2.3 trillion USD that the Pentagon lost?
      Or the fact that corruption is actually legalized in the USA in the form of lobbying? To the extent that corporations can donate to presidential candidates, because corporation are considered to be people in that specific case but no other?
      The difference is that corruption is not so out of hand in Russia that it has to be legalized for crying out loud..

    6. Re:They won't build shit by bloodhawk · · Score: 2

      No the sheer scale is pretty much the same, the only really difference is how it is presented the public. Most western countries hide the corruption behind regulations, donations, committees, fact finding missions, consultancies, reports etc etc. The level is the same but they ensure it is stamped as legal.... even then we still get a heap of pollies that aren't content with how much they are snorting up from the pig trough and get caught on the illegal stuff too.

    7. Re:They won't build shit by halivar · · Score: 1

      The difference is that in America, the graft and corruption is largely democratized; everyone gets a cut. Lobbyists get money for their projects, senators get projects for their state, and the state gets jobs associated with the project. Now, it's still crooked as all hell, but as far as oligarchies go it could be worse.

    8. Re:They won't build shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apart from that the 'democratized corruption' should be modded funny, the problem with that approach is that you no longer have anything remotely close to a democracy, the country is then controlled by uber rich and not by the elected officials. And your elections are then just a show for the masses. Now think why Khodorkovsky's story happened.

    9. Re:They won't build shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you seriously setting level of corruption in Russia as a standard for some countries to live up to?

  14. If you're into reading... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    A great science fiction series about humanity sending out and later retrieving a stash of unpatented genetic material from an alien planet is Wess'har Wars by Karen Travis.

  15. Yeah, right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to TFA, they are going to "collect the DNA of every living and extinct creature". Kind of tricky collecting DNA from extinct creatures, no? They may have some of them frozen in the tundra, but hardly all of them.

    Combine this with the preposterous size of this facility to be "completed by 2018" and I call BS on the whole thing. Sounds like another way to funnel government money to a few more of Putin's buddies...

    1. Re:Yeah, right by Mikkeles · · Score: 1

      To say nothing of the fact that, since to collect the DNA of a single-cell lifeform will essentially kill it, they intend on wiping out all bacteria, amoebae, etc.

      --
      Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
  16. Another Skolkovo scheme by avgapon · · Score: 1

    Sounds like another Skolkovo. But I am not sure if this new project would even take off given the economy trends.
    And their math does not add up: "a record injection of 1 billion rubles (US$194 million)". With RUB/USD rate > 50 they are an order of magnitude wrong in one of the numbers.

  17. Comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Scanning the comments section under the article is interesting. An incredible collection of delusional morons, or simply a throng of fake accounts posting (poorly written) Russian propaganda. The notion that actual human beings could be behind these opinions is frightening...

    1. Re:Comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The notion that actual human beings could be behind these opinions is frightening...

      They're probably religious.

    2. Re:Comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're probably /b/

  18. Already in process? by pr0t0 · · Score: 1

    Aren't there already several DNA library initiatives underway? I think one is called LifeTechnologies, and then there's the seed vault in Norway (I think it's Norway). There was also talks a long time ago about putting a DNA library on the moon, which obviously has not happened yet.

    --
    I'm sorry, but your opinion seems to be wrong.
  19. 1 billion rubles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is 17 million USD at today's exchange rate. Not the 194 million the article claims. Perhaps they'll have to scale back a little. After the usual bribes and moneys siphoned off to various Putin cronies, they should be able to afford a pretty nice chest freezer to put in the garage...

  20. All your base pairs... by dfn5 · · Score: 1

    ... are belong to us

    --
    -- Thou hast strayed far from the path of the Avatar.
    1. Re:All your base pairs... by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      It's a good thing I don't have mod points right now. I would have to hold my nose... and mod you up. Instead, I will just hold my nose.

  21. Math reality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Something doesn't add up here. 430 sq km ends up as a square more than 20 km on a side. I'd wonder which of Moscow State University's campuses are even close to large enough to have something like that. And $194 million may seem like a lot, but it won't even come close to enough to construct a building or buildings of that size, to say nothing of the technology to cryogenically freeze (and keep frozen) the cellular materials.

    This works out to about 4 cents per square foot, when the going rate for most construction (at least around here) is around $100 per square foot, just for a normal house. Heaven only knows what a "research" building would cost.

    This has to be a typo of some sort, though the original article mentions the same number.

  22. "430 sq km in size"...Bullshit by Bearhouse · · Score: 2

    So that's what, a little more than 20Km per side; if it's a sqaure block? Not happening anywhere, especially in Russia since the currency tanked.

    Also, storing something as tiny as DNA requires little space...

    1. Re:"430 sq km in size"...Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whilst it is true that just storing DNA takes little space, trying to get it into any sort of ordered system for cataloguing and to be accessed easily for research requires much more space. Think of prints storage in an art gallery. They are paper thin but need special separation and treatments that differ by age. They end up taking up way more space than you might originally think and not because of inefficiency, but because it makes sense when you think about it more.

      And it is not just DNA that is to be stored. With so much free space in Russia I am sure that they can spare a mere 430km^2.

  23. The CCCP is back! by wcrowe · · Score: 0

    Wow! I guess the Soviet Union really is back. This is the kind of flamboyant nonsense they used to put out in Pravda.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
  24. Cheap for the size by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lucky to build a house for $100 a square foot. That's what, just over $0.04 per square foot?

  25. "Mr. President ... we can't have a DNA GAP !!!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    - General Buck Turgidson

    1. Re:"Mr. President ... we can't have a DNA GAP !!!" by Hartree · · Score: 1

      "Stay on the PCR run, boys. I'm gonna get them DNA strands replicated if it harelips everybody on Bear Creek!"

      -Major Kong

  26. Not News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We've been knowing for quite some time that Russia wants to ice us.

  27. but then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    someone unplug the freezer and everything is lost.

  28. So which is it? by jc42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "First DNA Databank of All Living Things"
    "database that will house the DNA of every creature known to man"

    Those might be grammatically similar, but the numbers differ by several orders of magnitude.

    Humans really know mostly about multi-cellular critters, plus the tiny fraction of the single-celled species that interact with us somehow. Almost all single-celled species are yet to be discovered.

    One of the more interesting bits of evidence is that all of the deep-drilling projects, which have sampled only a tiny chunk of the planet's crust, have reported single-celled living things "all the way down". It'll take a while for us to do a good study of everything living deep down there. Similarly, several deep-water sampling projects have turned up large numbers of unknown microscopic species throughout their water columns.

    I guess this mostly goes to show how difficult it can be to do a good journalistic job of summarizing scientific work so that non-scientists can understand the actual results. "Ordinary English" (or French or Russian or any other human language) is sufficiently imprecise that it's very difficult to avoid misleading mistakes like the two summaries of this story.

    --
    Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  29. Re:Don't you mean KGB? by unixisc · · Score: 1

    KGB is passe - FSB or SVR are the replacement organizations.

  30. Nope. by goodmanj · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You can't build anything 430 square km in size for $194 million. Certainly not in central Moscow, because that's roughly the land area of *all* of Moscow. Even if you're just counting internal floor area and you build it 100 stories tall, it'd be the largest building in the world by floor area by a factor of 400, would be about the size of lower Manhattan, and be the largest building in the world by footprint by a factor of eight.

    Post-soviet Russia has a long track record of announcing glorious plans for amazing science and technology and not doing them. Going by press releases, they've got what, six Mars missions underway right now? Occasionally Russia does something cool, but I say, give 'em credit for their achievements, not their plans, because 99% of their plans are just pipe dreams. Goes double if it's announced by RT.com.

    1. Re:Nope. by goodmanj · · Score: 1

      Replying to my earlier post, I suppose it's possible some PR flack screwed up a unit conversion, and it's actually 430,000 square meters. Which is still a gigantic building you could never build for $194 million, but is significantly less ludicrous.

    2. Re:Nope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best post here! Bravo.

      Yeah, the size announced is mindbogglingly large. And given the state of the Russian economy these days, this whole thing reeks of "announcement now, build years down the road, or maybe never".

      Indeed when I read the post my first thought was, why so large? A DNA sample is easily stored in something the size of a test tube. In fact you don't need a standard height test tube, a smaller container would probably be better. Once you set up a standardized rack system, tens of thousands of samples could be stored in a single freezer. A medium sized industrial building could probably house the whole sample warehouse, at least at first. Add in some support buildings for the physical plant, on-site lab, security and administration.

    3. Re:Nope. by skovnymfe · · Score: 1

      Suppose these ingenious Russians deviced a way to put one building on top of another. Each building would then be connected by a metal box that can travel up and down along a corridor, perhaps attached to cables for pull action, or some sort of push device. Wouldn't that just be fantastical?

    4. Re:Nope. by goodmanj · · Score: 1

      I already mentioned multiple floors in my comments. If you're imagining something like the Burj Khalifa, imagine ONE THOUSAND of them side by side.
      Or maybe you're prefer something wider and flatter, like the U.S. Pentagon building? No problem, just build EIGHT HUNDRED of those stacked on top of each other.

      This is the world's largest building by floor area. 430 km^2 would be 400 of them.

  31. Paranoid thought by aquabat · · Score: 1

    I read some science fiction once, where the people in power did something like this, then nuked the entire world so they could start over from scratch, with their frozen samples. Just how delusional is Putin anyway?

    --
    A republic cannot succeed till it contains a certain body of men imbued with the principles of justice and honour.
  32. Please wait while we back up earth .. by thygate · · Score: 1

    isn't this just more war rhetoric ?

  33. Re: Don't you mean KGB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GRU is more ditastefull...

  34. For four cents a square foot? by jwbales · · Score: 0

    So how are they going to build this thing for four cents a square foot?

  35. Silly Headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every creature? Trillions of trillions of individual creatures?
    I don't think so.
    Every species and strain?
    Perhaps.

  36. Wouldn't we have to discover them all first? by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

    That would be a neat trick, since we haven't discovered and cataloged all species yet, not even close.

    Take beetles as an example. New species of beetles are being discovered constantly. Beetles make up a quarter of all known animal life-forms, and by some estimates there are orders of magnitude more undiscovered beetle species than there are known animal species of any kind. We will probably never even come close to discovering them all.

  37. TOO LATE! by iq145 · · Score: 1

    They've been beaten to it http://www.freshmess.com/2008/...

  38. So... by BadPirate · · Score: 1

    Where can I make a deposit?

    CHA-CHING!

    --
    - Holy crap, I've got MOD points! Who thought that was a good idea.