Slashdot Mirror


CIA on UFO Sightings: 'It Was Us'

mrflash818 sends word that the CIA has taken the blame for a majority of early UFO sightings. In a tweet, the agency said, "It was us," and linked to a document summarizing their use of U-2 spy planes from 1954-1974 (PDF). "High-altitude testing of the U-2led to an unexpected side effect — a tremendous increase in reports of unidentified flying objects," the CIA wrote in the document, which it wrote in 1998. "In the mid-1950s, most commercial airliners flew at altitudes between 10,000 and 20,000 feet and [many] military aircraftoperated at altitudes below 40,000 feet. Consequently, once U-2s started flying at altitudes above 60,000 feet, air-traffic controllers began receiving increasing numbers of UFO reports." [T]he CIA cross-referenced UFO sightings to U-2 flight logs. "This enabled the investigators to eliminate the majority of the UFO reports," the CIA wrote, "although they could not reveal to the letter writers the true cause of the UFO sightings."

21 of 197 comments (clear)

  1. Oh yeah? by halivar · · Score: 5, Funny

    If I was a Sleestak alien overlord, that's exactly what I would say.

    1. Re:Oh yeah? by g0bshiTe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sleestak were indigenous to earth you insensitive clod!

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  2. I'm not saying it was aliens... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But it was aliens.

    (BTW, what happened to the other half?

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    1. Re:I'm not saying it was aliens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Russian spy planes. What do you think the CIA was looking for?

    2. Re:I'm not saying it was aliens... by bondsbw · · Score: 5, Funny

      )

      There it is.

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    3. Re:I'm not saying it was aliens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Weather Balloons - Swamp Gas - Reflections of the Sun against ice particles in clouds - The planet Venus, Mars, Jupiter - Sputnik II - The Jupiter II - The USS Enterprise - that just about covers it...

    4. Re:I'm not saying it was aliens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Weather Balloons - Swamp Gas - Reflections of the Sun against ice particles in clouds - The planet Venus, Mars, Jupiter - Sputnik II - The Jupiter II - The USS Enterprise - that just about covers it...

      "just about covers it" you say.. I wonder what the rest were? Especially the silent ones flying in formation with large panels on their bottoms flashing bright primary colors that I saw go right over my head at night at perhaps 50 feet off the ground in the direction of Mt. Rainier, which about 10 minutes later were followed by two Air Force jets at slow speed but higher up. Then a while later what sounded like helicopters with strong search lights flew around over the forest to the side of the house where I was staying flashing the search beams around in the trees as they also slowly followed the same path towards Rainier.

      When one of them was directly above me I felt a deep thrumming vibration throughout my body, strong enough to almost be audible, which then quickly faded as it drifted past me. There were no other sounds coming from them. This was back in the 90's.

      * Say what you will, but at the very least there is tech flying/floating around this world that no Government is yet admitting to having.

  3. That's not all.. by gurps_npc · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wait till they declassify the Elvis sighting reports... It was really President JFK, disguised by plastic surgery after he secretly resigned !

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
  4. Re:What's the real story? by kelemvor4 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Whenever the CIA admits to something, I wonder, what's the bigger lie they're trying to cover up? Or, am I just being paranoid?

    Citizens of other countries might think you're being paranoid. To Americans, it's obvious that you are right.

    However in this case it might not be so much of a "cover up" as it is an effort to get everyone's mind off of torture.

  5. Re:Skeptical by confused+one · · Score: 3, Interesting

    U2 aircraft are responsible for some. F-117 stealth fighters were responsible for quite a few too -- they were operational for over a decade before it was publically acknowledged they existed.

  6. Re:So the CIA = Aliens? by zlives · · Score: 5, Funny

    that would explain the anal probes

  7. Where are the anal probe results? by uCallHimDrJ0NES · · Score: 3, Funny

    I am submitting a FOIA request to get that anal probe data.

    --
    Cloudiot: A person who does not see offsite storage as a way to lose control over access to his or her own data.
  8. Re:Skeptical by Penguinisto · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As someone who once worked for Project Senior Trend, the sibling post has it dead-on.

    It was much preferable for the USAF to have folks think that ET stopped by, than to let them realize that what they were really seeing were F-117s flying overhead (mind you, nearly all sorties were done at night, but things happen, and dawn/dusk is kind of an awkward time, at least visually.) In profile (side or front/rear), the jet has a saucer-like shape, and definitely something that doesn't look like an ordinary civilian or military aircraft. Funny enough, the Soviets were more than happy to foster and even encourage alien conspiracy theories, if only to keep their own population from thinking that they saw some secret military project flying overhead.

    Other notable examples of military aircraft that would cause confusion and optical illusions? The SR-71/A-12 in its early days, the B-47 flying wing, and its grandkid, the B-2 bomber.

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  9. Well... by Holistic+Missile · · Score: 3, Funny

    I guess this identification chart is now obsolete:

    http://xmb.stuffucanuse.com/xm...

    --
    When you're dead, you don't know you're dead. It only affects the people around you. Same thing when you're stupid.
  10. hmmm...no. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is such horseshit. Regardless of what you think of UFOs, of the hundreds of thousands of UFO sightings, many reported by military people, law enforcement and people trained to observe aircraft, hardly any of them resembled anything like a U2 spyplane.

    Last time I checked, a U2 spyplane was not really capable of hovering motionless and then accelerating to the horizon in a moment. Nor were they gigantic triangular craft.

    I don't think for a second that there are aliens from Ork involved with the UFO sightings that have been common for the last five millennia, but I doubt more than a handful were people who were seeing U2 spyplanes. Who knows fuck-all about what those UFOs really were or whether they were inside or outside the observers heads? But at the moment, I'm not prepared to believe a goddamn thing the CIA says about anything. In my opinion, they're a bigger threat to people's safety and sanity than practically any outside threat, including North Korea, Iran, Russia or Israel (who are all plenty bad),

    Now, if you want to tell me that the abductions people have been reporting for the past 40 years are the CIA, I may buy that, because they are some sadistic motherfuckers who love putting things up peoples' asses, as we have learned from recent government leaks. Yeah, anal probes, mutilations, etc, that sounds just like the CIA's speed.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:hmmm...no. by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Last time I checked, a U2 spyplane was not really capable of hovering motionless and then accelerating to the horizon in a moment. Nor were they gigantic triangular craft.

      Last time I checked, people were incredibly bad at objectively reporting what they see, and other people were incredibly bad at relating what the first people said they saw, and then other people get what they heard from the second people confused with something they saw on TV, and then yet more people read books by Erich Von Daniken

      What I find weird is that the kajillion-fold increase in personal video recording devices over the past few decades seems to have scared away all the UFOs. Why, a week hardly went by in the 1980s without a flap, but now...

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    2. Re:hmmm...no. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What I find weird is that the kajillion-fold increase in personal video recording devices over the past few decades seems to have scared away all the UFOs.

      Have you ever tried to record an aircraft from your cell phone? It really doesn't work.

      By your logic, if cell phone recording was the only way to establish something's reality, commercial aircraft don't exist either.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  11. Re:Skeptical by Charliemopps · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...and don't forget the SR-71...
    F-117 and U2 were practically average looking compared to that thing. My father was in the air-force and got to see one land before they were declassified. He said his first reaction was ALIENS! But changed his after it landed like any normal aircraft.

  12. Re:Skeptical by Beck_Neard · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The SR-71 - which moved about 3x as fast as almost all military aircraft at the time - was first tested around the early 1960's. Then there was suddenly a surge of sightings of triangle-shaped ufos blazing around at mach 3 speeds, which _obviously_ couldn't have been from a military jet because no military jet went that fast.

    --
    A fool and his hard drive are soon parted.
  13. Re:What about "The Day After Roswell" book? by hey! · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yes military aircraft probably accounts for the majority of sightings, but not the ones that zip around faster than anything we have even today, stop on a dime and go another direction just as fast..

    I've seen objects like this, multiple times, but I've always been able to explain in mundane terms after watching closely -- I'm the kind of guy who keeps binoculars in the car just in case the night skies are clear. I'd *love* to see an alien spaceship, but being a habitual sky watcher things that occasional sky watcher might take as a spacecraft look like ordinary phenomena to me.

    And it's not because I only see what I'm told could be real. Decades ago I experienced something which science said was impossible: meteors shooting overhead with a rocket-like sound. The reason this is impossible is that meteors are fifty or a hundred miles up -- sound could not travel fast enough through the atmosphere. But I knew what I saw and heard, and in 2001 scientists actually observed this phenomenon, electrophonic meteors.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  14. Unreliability of your perception of things you see by dpbsmith · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you look at one of those Internet compilations of Photos you really need to look at to understand, it is very impressive just how confused you can be by chance juxtapositions of visual elements.

    #18 is particularly interesting. It's not a precise juxtaposition. The shadow looks like the shadow of a flag; it's not shaped like the rug. You can understand intellectually what's happening in about five seconds. And yet it takes a real effort of will to perceive the rug is lying on the sand. Relax for an instant and it once again looks as if it is levitating.