Slashdot Mirror
Doxing -- Something To Expect More of In 2015
HughPickens.com writes: When asked about trends to expect in 2015, Bruce Schneier points to doxing as a likely candidate. Doxing is not new, dating back to at least 1987 when Robert Bork's video tape rentals were leaked to the press. Usually it's things like an address and phone number, but it can also be credit card details, medical information, private e-mails—pretty much anything an assailant can get his hands on. "Everyone from political activists to hackers to government leaders has now learned how effective this attack is. Everyone from common individuals to corporate executives to government leaders now fears this will happen to them. And I believe this will change how we think about computing and the Internet."
For those too lazy to google:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
It's hardly a new word, it's been in active use for the best part of 10 years.
It's jargon in active use, used by people precisely because it's not mainstream.
Is that everyone has some skeletons in the closet they're hiding. Yours might not be as severe as someone else's, or it may be from back when you were a stupid teen. But there's something that would embarrass you or tarnish your reputation if it were made public. Maybe you tried smoking weed in college, or you had sex with your high school GF when she (and you) were technically underage, or all manner of other things.
So if facts uncovered by doxing becomes accepted as legitimate grounds for disqualification, then the only people who will get the good job positions or get elected will be the liars who are exceptionally good at covering up their history or shifting blame onto others.
Instead, what needs to happen is for people to stop demanding perfection from others. Everyone is human, and humans are fallible. Someone who claims to have never failed, to have always done the right thing, is almost certainly a liar, a con artist.. That's what should raise suspicion about someone's fitness for a job or elected office - the absence of any skeletons in the closet. If society can change to where we accept that we're all flawed and that a few flaws shouldn't automatically disqualify us, then doxing largely becomes irrelevant and IMHO our world will become a much nicer place.
Doxing is releasing private information to the public. Names and addresses are not private information. Drama queens have tried to redefine this in vain attempts to control who gets to use the information they've already provided online.
Eg: John Doe posts a blog entry loaded with clickbait fallacy under his real name, looking for a reaction to boost his lack of self esteem and gain e-prestige, but wasn't ready for criticism. When his post doesn't quite get the attention he was looking for, some type his name into a search engine and find his address and telephone and post this already public information on some forum. If he gains a lot of notoriety, some will go further, armed with the already public info to pick away at what else may be public, but not published like his name and address. Rather than address his shoddy argument, he claims he was 'doxed' instead, ignoring the fact it was his fault for associating his real name with his post in the first place.
Social justice warriors LOVE to fox people and threaten them and their employers if they dare have differing points of view (all while claiming to be the VICTIMS of doxxing, themselves).
Languages evolve. Deal with it.
Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
Is there a shorter or more descriptive word / phrase that you can use to describe the practice of leaking personal information in order to attack or retaliate against someone you don't like?
Docsing or doxing sounds like a good way to express that concept.
used by people precisely because it's not mainstream.
"Subdural haematoma" isn't mainstream either, but doctors don't just use it because they're hipsters.
systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
Oh really? I've been a regular visitor to Slashdot since 1998 and I've never seen it mentioned before. A search lists only 3 submissions that use the word since 2013. Furthermore, the word isn't even listened in my Merriam-Webster's dictionary which has a massive selection of words that, as you would put it, are "hardly new." So, excuse me, Professor, but it is in fact a new word.
It's not a secret that you have body parts. But it's a violation of your privacy to publish photos of them against your will.
Bonus round... doesn't happen that often at work or play or grocery shopping.
The trick is to embrace an unsettled World view.
Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.
Ernest Hemingway
It's jargon in active use, used by people precisely because it's not mainstream.
Exactly. It currently carries the scent of newness, youth culture, "in the know" trendiness. To deny that is silly.
Maybe someday it will just be a useful everyday word. Not yet.
TFA mentions Gamergate in the context of the doxxing but all the victims mentioned just happen to be on the anti-GG side (innocent mistake, I'm sure).
Pro-GG people have been doxxed:
http://imgur.com/BNlLKcn
So was the creator of #notyourshield, and his workplace was harassed until he was fired:
https://twitter.com/Moldybars/...
http://i.imgur.com/9ieHMu9.png
A prominent anti-GGer called for the doxxing of all Gamergate supporters: http://i.gyazo.com/5db582013ac...
At least the pro-GG makes an effort to detect, condemn, and report this shitty behavior, no matter which side it comes from.
Since this appears every second week on a medical procedural show it actually is mainstream.
All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
Or, we could use the correct wording for each situation, brought to you by one of those English dictionary's you had at school.
Usually it's things like an address and phone number, but it can also be credit card details, medical information, private e-mails—pretty much anything an assailant can get his hands on
Pretty simple: Identity Theft.
This is an increasingly common tactic used by people who disagree with other people.
You're a racist? Let's get you fired:
http://gettingracistsfired.com...
You're a scumbag who doesn't deliver on a kickstarter? Let's bother your parents:
https://www.kickstarter.com/pr...
Sure, this isn't new - the latter is just an extension of small-town "you come around here doing that again and I'll be talking to your mama". But the motive and intent are different. It's not about the parents being the authority figure instilling some sense into the kid, but about harassing the parents so that they, too, will blame the 'kid' for woes.
In the former case, it hinges on when things you say are personal, and when they are things you say as a representative of a company.
Post on company blog - company.
Post on facebook with place of employ listed - apparently, company.
Post on twitter with no place of employ listed but people find out through your name and location anyway - according to that blog, company.
Post on a random forum under a pseudonym but given enough searching around have your place of employ found - if you're thinking this should be personal, you're disagreeing with that site.
Increasingly, "what you do in your personal time is your own business" no longer flies, because whatever you do in your personal time can - thanks to the pressure power of social media - very much become your employer's business... even if they have no issue with you personally, but get negative attention for employing you.
- From one employee manual, in context about outside employment but easily interpreted to also apply to these cases.
Languages devolve. Deal with it.
FTFY
It's been around for a while, but it is mostly a 4chan and IRC thing.
lucm, indeed.
Actually, the "yet" is here, now that you know about it.
It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
It is useful right now, and has been for several years within the communities where doxing has become a known problem. It is a jargon word that is gaining mainstream use simply because the mainstream is now beginning to see a significant increase in the behavior it describes.
A similar term, "outing" (as in "John was deliberated outed last week by Jim, his ex lover") has been in use among the LBGT communities since at least the 1950s. But that refers explicitly to making public someone's very private sexual orientation.
However "doxing" is different from "outing": it is a more general term describing the unauthorized release of anyone's private information in a public forum. It is rarely an honorable act and in general those who dox others are persons without honor. And the honor of those who condone doxing is questionable. People who dox, or show support for doxing, are people you cannot trust. You should not associate with them, either, since that will raise questions about your personal honor.
"Doxing" is a concept that needs to come into the mainstream, right now.
Will
The summary is almost as long as the linked blog post, which reads more like a "Computer Guy" column in a magazine for retired dentists than Slashdot material.
My favorite part:
"In 2014, several women were doxed by male gamers trying to intimidate them into keeping silent about sexism in computer games."
Wuss.
lucm, indeed.
Good thing I had the foresight to made it difficult to impossible to associate any online nickname or username or URL with my actual name like 8+ years ago.
Is there a word for wanting to punch someone in the dick because they invented a stupid new word? Because payback is still required for "blog", "twerk" and "phablet". Someone might need to get punched in the dick twice for "phablet." I'm sure the Germans probably have a word for it...
I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?
/. wants to cover Gamergate, but doesn't want to be honest and upfront that it's doing so (and taking a side). That's because users are in charge of the discussion, and we (or at least most of us) don't buy the "misogyny and harassment" narrative no matter how many times they repeat it without evidence. So this is at least the dozenth article to follow the template "misogyny, harassment, threats, misogyny, harassment, threats . . . oh BTW Gamergate."
/., because even though it is hopelessly anti-GG, it's at least upfront that the GG scandal is the topic of discussion.
The tactic is sad and (by now) easily recognizable for what it is: a thinly-veiled smear. It's why I said this summary was the most unbiased GG summary on
To be hip, it has to be a bilateral subdural haemotoma.
Truly.
Pretending this is my office full of bitter coworkers..
I like this. It's like the whole - there is honor among thieves - bit. It's sort of true. They identify with each other, yeah, but they also steal from each other constantly. You can't trust a thief, and you cannot trust an extortionist. Period. They will turn on you, and if you are one of them - you will turn on your 'friends'. It's inevitable. I have seen doxing used in honorable ways. This is not the case, lately. Disgusting humans.
I prefer doxxing. doxing looks like DOH-xing
srsly? its been all over the internet for some time. a lot of the #gamergate nonsense revolves around doxxing. it's a common 4chan tactic. are you new to the tubes?
The ones who get elected will be the the ones that the holders of the information choose - they simply won't reveal their video rental habits or out-of-context emails.
So, if, hypothetically, some agency were logging all of the internet activity of everyone, they'd have a lot of power over anyone who wanted to do something that required public approval. At a minimum they'd probably be able to make sure that their agency survived despite scandal after scandal, including those which reveal the existence of this very plan, and even documented nefarious use of the collected information, whether for manipulating politicians, or more mundane extortion, or stalking ex's, etc.
A world in which people look past the weird habits of their neighbors instead of looking for a reason to feel superior to them is a pretty lofty idea to hope for. Possibly the only remaining option is to have enough competing organizations using this tactic that it affects everyone, eventually inoculating society from the tactic.
Can you be Even More Awesome?!
Investigative journalist Wayne Madsen, who worked with the National Security Agency from 1984 to 1988 as a Navy intelligence analyst, confirmed DuJanâ(TM)s claims.
âoeIt is common knowledge in the Chicago gay community that Obama actively visited the gay bars and bathhouses in Chicago while he was an Illinois state senator,â Madsen told WND.
Wow, "investigative journalist"! I didn't know the NSA pays you for fucking around in gay bathhouses. Where do I apply?
So if facts uncovered by doxing becomes accepted as legitimate grounds for disqualification, then the only people who will get the good job positions or get elected will be the liars who are exceptionally good at covering up their history or shifting blame onto others.
What will happen is that everyone will realize they have skeletons, everyone growing up now will have all kinds of embarrassing things embedded in the internet to be found - so by and large people will simply stop caring about what things are uncovered about someone, unless they are truly monstrous.
So you will eventually get your wish. You cannot get it now, because people cannot really change in that way... it needs to be something built up over a long period of time. But it will happen.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
Do you also like to spell it Boxxing?
Man blir trött av att gå och göra ingenting.
Identify?
I mean that is essentially what you are doing- identifying people by their real world "identities".
OR does the intent to "attack or retaliate" change things so drastically that it doesn't fit?
I'm not a native English speaker, but in my mind the concept of identifying does not necessarily include communicating it to the rest of the word. Then you would have to say "publicly identify", or something along those lines, to convey the concept of doxing.
Is there a shorter or more descriptive word / phrase that you can use to describe the practice of leaking personal information in order to attack or retaliate against someone you don't like?
Docsing or doxing sounds like a good way to express that concept.
A cute hacker word is a horrible way to describe something that is blackmail without the demands, but the same damaging results.
It's just a form of harassment, and should be treated as such without the silly geek-speak to make it sound harmless.
I'd sooner loosen the definition of blackmail and call it that.
8675309
blindly antisocialist = antisocial