Slashdot Mirror


Seismological Society of America Claims Fracking Reactivated Ohio Fault

eldavojohn writes There have been suspicions that fracking has caused minor earthquakes in Ohio but last year seismic data recorded by the Earthscope Transportable Array was analyzed by the Seismological Society of America using template matching and has resulted in a new publication and press release making the statement that Hilcorp Energy's fracking in Poland Township in March of 2014 "did not create a new fault, rather it activated one that we didn't know about prior to the seismic activity." The earthquakes occurred in the Precambrian basement and lead the researchers to posit that further unknown faults may be activated by fracking. The press release ends with urging for "close cooperation among government, industry and the scientific community as hydraulic fracturing operations expand in areas where there's the potential for unknown pre-existing faults."

10 of 168 comments (clear)

  1. Good luck with that. by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Despite there being no published science about its safety, and despite evidence that it is actually polluting wells and ground water ... it will keep happening.

    Because government officials are all paid heavily by the oil and gas industry to make damned sure they can do anything they want to, right up to tearing up private property because they want to.

    These short sighted clowns only care about profits, and don't give a damn about anything else.

    I can't imagine government is going to start reigning in corporations any time soon ... which means all laws and policy will continue to be so skewed in favor of corporations as to be laughable.

    America is nothing but an oligarchy these days.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:Good luck with that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "America is nothing but an oligarchy these days."

      When was it not? The few people in power have always controlled everything, not just in America, but everywhere. And it will always be like that.

    2. Re:Good luck with that. by aaron4801 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Increased seismic activity, sure. But has there been any documented seismic damage? A bunch of 2-mile-deep 2.0 earthquakes are not even going to be felt by more than the most sensitive equipment. If there is a larger fault in the area, then frequent, small releases of energy are good for man-made structures on the surface by not letting the fault store up too much energy. It's when fault stops moving that you should get scared.

    3. Re:Good luck with that. by SydShamino · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They (the owners of the company, not the pseudo-person company itself) would happily agree to those terms, knowing that they are protected by investor and bankruptcy laws, and eventually their own deaths and inheritance laws. Those terms are thus meaningless. Long-term environmental protection must be done through preventative regulation, not through post-damage punishment, as the time scales ensure those responsible cannot be adequately punished.

      I'm not making any claim as to whether fracking causes long-term environmental damage (though I'm happy it's not happening under my house), just pointing out that if it did, reactive punishment wouldn't stop it.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
  2. what if by ganjadude · · Score: 4, Insightful

    what if causing a number of small earthquakes prolongs the release of a large one. Less energy is being pent up so the slippage should do less damage

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    1. Re:what if by Solandri · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is a reactivated fault line -- not something that was due to go off. Every single time this topic comes up, some cadre upvotes this trash ...

      This is basic high school physics. Energy cannot be created or destroyed, it is conserved. If the amount of energy the fracking put into the ground was less than the amount of energy released from the earthquake, then clearly there was another source of that excess energy. Mainly, tectonic movements had built up stresses into the ground, which would have eventually been released as a natural earthquake if there had been no fracking.

      Active fault lines are good. It means tectonic stresses are being regularly released. Inactive fault lines can be good or bad. If there are no more tectonic stresses being built up, then the fault can't cause an earthquake, and it's good. But if there are tectonic stresses being built up, then it's bad because it means that energy isn't being released at regular intervals. We just think it's inactive when it's really not, and it's going to cause a big doozy of an earthquake in the future.

      Since the fracking triggered an earthquake, clearly there were stresses in the "inactive" fault, and the fault was of the latter type and thus not truly inactive, and the fracking merely relieved the stress. Basically, if a fault line can be "reactivated", then it was never really an inactive fault line in the first place.

      There are some macro (continental-scale) arguments that can be made about plate movements and whether the overall rate at which the plates move (and thus build up stresses in the rocks) can be affected by deliberately relieving some of those stresses (e.g. fracking). And thus fracking could be bad because it increases the rate at which the plates move, and thus increase the rate at which stress builds up and earthquakes happen. But on the local level, the basic jist of the argument that fracking merely triggers earthquakes which were going to eventually happen anyway is correct. Anybody who understands high school level physics can see that.

  3. Re:"Don't install a basement" by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 5, Funny

    I told the Precambrian family not to install a basement. But did they listen? Noooooo.

    Well then... this is obviously their fault.

  4. Re:But ... but ... gas is below 2 bucks man! by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The middle east producers are most certainly NOT dropping prices.

    The prices are dropping because there's a lot of it around, and because whatever vagaries in the market say the price goes down.

    What the middle east producers are doing is refusing to cut outputs in the face of dropping prices, because they have tons of cash and don't care if it puts American producers out of business.

    OPEC doesn't set the price, just output levels.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  5. Re:Less chance of dangerous quake now by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 4, Informative

    Don't the mini quakes release energy from the faults more safely?

    mini quakes along active fault lines release pent-up energy that protects against "the big one" -- but a dormant fault is like a healed over fracture in your bone -- if nothing disturbs it, it will continue to heal over. Now that it is active again, this will cause a chain reaction of stresses that will likely have continental and possibly global consequences, as it changes the way the other faults interact with each other.

    Basically, it made all the related fracture lines that much less predictable.

  6. Re:Scientists are government officials too by Layzej · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Citing "Australia right now" in support of "Global Warming" (also known as "Climate Change") is ridiculous

    Maybe, unless you have insight into the trends and Australia Now is consistent with those trends. Extremes that would have happened about 2% of the time in the 30 years prior to the 80's were happening about 6% of the time in the 30 years prior to 2010. In the last 15 years they have occurred about 10% of the time: http://www.bom.gov.au/state-of... . This trend of increasing extremes is what we would expect in a warming country: http://www.bom.gov.au/state-of...

    The picture becomes even more cohesive if you look at the temperature trend in the context of radiative physics and what we know about the atmospheric CO2 trend.