Slashdot Mirror


Thync, a Wearable That Zaps Your Brain To Calm You Down or Amp You Up

blottsie sends this first-hand report on how it felt to use a wearable device called Thync, which sends small amounts of electricity into your brain for the purpose of either calming you down or making you feel energized. While the unit I used isn't the finalized physical version, the best way to describe it is as a two-part device, one of which is fasted to the front of the right side of your temple, and one behind your right ear. It's not a helmet, which is what I absolutely assumed it would be. It's relatively discreet sort of dual patch system ... It didn't... hurt. Hurt isn't the right way to describe it. It felt like a tightness; it felt like the patch was trying to crawl across my skin. But — if you can believe this — in a good way. And while Thync was attached to the right side of my head, occasionally I felt 'tingles' pulling and hitting my brain on the left side and in the middle. I was feeling progressively awake and aware. Granted, I had patches stuck to my head sending gentle vibrations to my brain, so that might have been part of my sudden alertness. But still, after 20 minutes of Thync I just felt... better.

154 comments

  1. A new kind of drug? by axlash · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If the devices like this really do end up working, they'd be doing what many recreational drugs do today.

    I wonder what this would mean for the war on drugs...

    --
    Deal with reality - the world as it is - rather than ideality - the world as you would like it to be.
    1. Re:A new kind of drug? by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      It means the FDA will have something to say about it..

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re:A new kind of drug? by mysidia · · Score: 2

      If the device is not intended to diagnose or treat a health condition, then the FDA has no authority over it.

      On the other hand.... if the Consumer Product Safety Commission Tsar doesn't like it, the commission could label it as "unsafe" and ban the sale of the product and issue mandatory recall: you know, like they did with buckyballs.

    3. Re:A new kind of drug? by tiberus · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I don't think the FDA is so much interested in intent vs. what the thing actually does. At best it's walking a very fine line in regard to being a medical device. My guess would be that they would rather deal with the FDA in lieu of the CPSC.

    4. Re:A new kind of drug? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sunglasses are considered medical devices and come under FDA regulation. I'm pretty sure that something that's intended to alter the brain via electric zaps is going to as well.

    5. Re:A new kind of drug? by Kierthos · · Score: 1

      If all they do is claim it though (with no actual benefit), the FDA will have a word with them. They did over those silly e-meters the Scientologists came up with.

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    6. Re: A new kind of drug? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder ... what ... this would ... mean for the ... abuse ... of ellipses.

    7. Re:A new kind of drug? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      If the device is not intended to diagnose or treat a health condition, then the FDA has no authority over it.

      The device is claiming it can alter your mood by attaching to your head.

      I'm pretty sure you'll find that meets the definition of 'medical device'.

      So, either they have some science to back this medical claim up ... in which case they know they're a medical device. Or they don't have any science, in which case it's quackery, and an illegal medical device.

      But you can't make the assertion that by strapping that thing to your head it can make a change to your mood, in a way that's supposed to be good for you and safe, and NOT be a medical device.

      And, you can't just hide behind being a tech company and say the law doesn't apply. Uber might sue you for infringing on their business process.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    8. Re:A new kind of drug? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      And before anybody makes a claim to the contrary, here's the FDA definition:

      "an instrument, apparatus, implement, machine, contrivance, implant, in vitro reagent, or other similar or related article, including a component part, or accessory which is:

      • recognized in the official National Formulary, or the United States Pharmacopoeia, or any supplement to them,
      • intended for use in the diagnosis of disease or other conditions, or in the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease, in man or other animals, or
      • intended to affect the structure or any function of the body of man or other animals, and which does not achieve its primary intended purposes through chemical action within or on the body of man or other animals and which is not dependent upon being metabolized for the achievement of any of its primary intended purposes."

      Emphasis mine.

      This is a medical device, and will be treated as such.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    9. Re:A new kind of drug? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try peeing on an electrical outlet.
      Will have a much more pronounced effect to wake you up...

    10. Re: A new kind of drug? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but that doesn't work, there are gaps in the urine steam.

    11. Re: A new kind of drug? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ellipses = zaps

    12. Re:A new kind of drug? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No it won't. There is not a constant stream. see Mythbuster's episode about peeing on the third rail. They also tried an electric fence.

    13. Re:A new kind of drug? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Electrical stimulation for the brain works a lot like hitting those old TV sets until the image stabilizes. Most of the time you get bored and nothing happens, or if it does it's wishful thinking, but after a while, parts come loose and the quality either improves or gets worse(most of the time).

      What nobody is really saying that our knowledge of how the brain functions is still pretty much a mystery even today.

      The specialized treatments hit areas that are known to have some positive effect, found through trial and error. It's not a magic band you strap to your head and zap your problems away.

    14. Re: A new kind of drug? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Yeah but that doesn't work, there are gaps in the urine steam.

      Don't cross the streams, the results will be even more shocking!

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    15. Re:A new kind of drug? by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      It means big pharm will have something to say about it..

      FTFY

    16. Re:A new kind of drug? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      If the devices like this really do end up working, they'd be doing what many recreational drugs do today.

      I wonder what this would mean for the war on drugs...

      The puritanicals will outlaw it.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    17. Re:A new kind of drug? by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      This is no different than other pseudo-scientific new-age placebo-wearables like magnetic bracelets

      Pretty sure it is different.

      Your wrists, nerves and other fleshy parts don't run on, and don't give a crap about, magnetic fields. They are also non-metallic, so moving magnetic fields don't induce current in them.

      If I understand it correctly, the device under discussion here works by inducing new currents into your brain, more or less directly -- and your brain does function by generating and passing electrical impulses around.

      So the former is purest homeopathic-class nonsense that does absolutely nothing, while the latter is a device that directly modifies brain activity.

      Going to go with "definitely different."

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    18. Re:A new kind of drug? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      As noted, the device operates is battery powered and influences the brain through electricity, therefore it achieves its primary intended purpose through chemical action on the body....

      Also... This device is not intended to affect the structure or any function of the body; as shown in the summary, the device is intended to affect how energized you feel, so this is a highly subjective matter and how nice you feel is not related to any specific structure or function of the body.

      Just in the same sense you could stare at a bright light in the hopes of feeling more energized or take a cup of coffee, but it doesn't make bright lights medical devices, and it doesn't make Coffee a drug subject to FDA regulation as a medication, even if these products are advertised that they can do that: the usage is not a medical purpose.

    19. Re:A new kind of drug? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The Relief Band" is marketed as a device which functions as an anti-emetic, strapped to the inside of your wrist, and the FDA has allowed it to be marketed for that purpose, and insurance companies can (and do) pay for them for certain conditions - pregnant women experiencing terrible morning sickness who are constrained from pharmaceutical anti-emetics, and chemotherapy patients who can't keep drugs down long enough to be effect being examples.

      So it's possible that it's not *complete* homeopathic nonsense (and homeopathy is entirely nonsensical, yes).

    20. Re:A new kind of drug? by sjames · · Score: 1

      The device is claiming it can alter your mood by attaching to your head.

      So it's a mechanical hooker? I don't think that's the FDA's domain.

  2. harrison bergeron by schneidafunk · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I hope they didn't get the idea from Vonnegut; I recall it ending badly for those involved.

    --
    Some people die at 25 and aren't buried until 75. -Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:harrison bergeron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anyone remember Tek?

    2. Re:harrison bergeron by Altus · · Score: 1

      The kids have to learn about Tek War sooner or later

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    3. Re:harrison bergeron by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Louis Wu is a wirehead.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  3. Claims it felt good by gurps_npc · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I think Larry Niven (and I am sure many others) wrote about a future where people got addicted to a device that electrically stimulated the pleasure centers of the brain.

    Is this the beginning of our new addiction?

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:Claims it felt good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He did, referred to them as wireheads.

      If they can perfect this so that you can get results that match your drug of choice...

    2. Re:Claims it felt good by Kierthos · · Score: 2

      There was a Spider Robinson story about it as well, called Mindkiller. One of the characters in the story attempted suicide by permanent wireheading.

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    3. Re:Claims it felt good by disposable60 · · Score: 1

      See also: Philip Jose Farmer's _Riders of the Purple Wage_.

      --
      You're looking for quotes? See my journal.
    4. Re:Claims it felt good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we ever invent a tasp, society if doomed.

    5. Re:Claims it felt good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > Is this the beginning of our new addiction?

      Addiction is primarily about compensating for something that is missing or wrong in a person's life. Even all those studies that showed rats ODing on cocaine turned out to be about the fact that the rats were stuck in itty-bitty cages, when they put rats in "free range" enclosures with stuff to keep them occupied, they no longer had much interest in cocaine. You can become addicted to practically anything - substance or activity, think gym rats and obsessive collectors of star wars memorabilia. So sure, electrostim is something you can become addicted to if your life sucks.

    6. Re:Claims it felt good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When they can perfect this so that you can get results that beat your drug of choice...

      I think that's probably more accurate sine the body doesn't seam to develop a tolerance to electrode stimulation. Also, there is proof that a parkinsons treatment would create wireheads if the electrode was installed just a bit to the right.

    7. Re:Claims it felt good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... a device that electrically stimulated the pleasure centers ...

      There was a similar idea in "Ringworld", where the device was called a tasp. I assume the dedicated novel appeared later.

    8. Re:Claims it felt good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Orgasmatron: Strange tale of a pleasure implant
      http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20140321-orgasms-at-the-push-of-a-button

      Technology and the Pursuit of Happiness (Alan Bellow)
      http://www.damninteresting.com/technology-and-the-pursuit-of-happiness/
      [...] These early experiments found that applying a small electrical charge to the brain's reward centers provided a very potent positive-feedback mechanism. Even if an animal was deprived of food for 24 hours, when confronted with a choice between food and this particular type of brain stimulation, it would always select the latter. The researchers also built an apparatus where an animal could use a lever to trigger the electrical current, and after it learned how the mechanism worked, the animal would stimulate its own brain regularly about once very five seconds, taking a stimulus of a second or so every time.

    9. Re:Claims it felt good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As somebody who most likely is a 'genetic addict', This doesn't look like a drug, it looks like a robotic arm prosthetic. I am hopeful this actually does what it claims.

  4. Great, wearable home electroshock therapy! by Narcocide · · Score: 0

    Magically washing away all those horribly traumatizing childhood experiences... along with most of your personality!

    1. Re:Great, wearable home electroshock therapy! by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Before this, we referred to wearable devices that did this as "hip flasks".

    2. Re:Great, wearable home electroshock therapy! by hattable · · Score: 1

      I'll hazard a guess that most of what you know about ECT is from a movie.

      On the off chance you have experienced it or know someone who has then you should probably have found a better doctor because the majority of cases where ECT is a treatment choice it is effective (because you don't use it as first line therapy or on a whim) and doesn't turn you into a robot. Hair loss is more common. Medications for depression/anxiety/etc have a higher chance of worse side effects but no one outside of those experiencing them really complains about it.

      --
      OMG facts!
    3. Re:Great, wearable home electroshock therapy! by Narcocide · · Score: 2

      No, the mods got it right this time; I was straight-up trolling. However, I was hoping for +5 Funny. It works for me about half the time.

  5. So it's like ... by bigjocker · · Score: 1

    ... using brass and pewter on yourself?

    --
    Life isn't like a box of chocolates. It's more like a jar of jalapenos. What you do today, might burn your ass tomorrow.
  6. Literal mind control by kheldan · · Score: 0, Troll

    Great. I suppose this will also be part of the 'internet of things', too? Goodie, not the government will be able to 'calm down' the populace with the push of a button. Handy for quelling inconvenient things like public political protests, freedom of speech, etc. Politicians will LOVE it.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    1. Re:Literal mind control by hattable · · Score: 1

      Is this something that you are actually concerned about?

      --
      OMG facts!
    2. Re: Literal mind control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Only if we're forced to kill Jedi.

    3. Re:Literal mind control by kheldan · · Score: 1

      Yes, it is. If you aren't, then you're not paying attention.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  7. Future notes from Molly McHugh's journal by Bovius · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Day 35 of insomnia. I only slept for 40 minutes today, with Thync turned up to maximum calming for 6 hours. I still managed to get a few hours of work in with alert enhancement on. Could barely focus. Need more sleep.

  8. Placebo effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a magic toque I will sell you that does the exact same thing!

  9. Straight jacket included by popo · · Score: 0

    And if you act now, the manufacturers will throw in not one, but TWO all-cotton straight-jackets, and a complete set of heavy duty bed-straps for your own electro-shock therapy sessions.

    --
    ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
  10. Wirehead? by gstoddart · · Score: 2

    Hmmm .... suddenly I'm picturing Louis Wu with his droud attached.

    I shall pass on this.

    Because I'm sure nobody can actually tell you this is safe and have any science to back it up.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:Wirehead? by gurps_npc · · Score: 1

      That's the word - DROUD. Thanks, it was driving me crazy that I couldn't remember what Niven called this.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    2. Re:Wirehead? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      LOL ... you still let things drive you crazy before you google it? Really?

      Sounds very masochistic. :-P

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:Wirehead? by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      Well, a droud utilizes a wire that actually goes into the brain. The tasp, on the other hand, works externally and remotely. So this is somewhere in between the two.

    4. Re:Wirehead? by sh00z · · Score: 1

      Hmmm .... suddenly I'm picturing Louis Wu with his droud attached.

      I shall pass on this.

      Because I'm sure nobody can actually tell you this is safe and have any science to back it up.

      Silly me, I was thinking Iran Decker and her Mood Organ.

    5. Re:Wirehead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you google a word you cant remember?

    6. Re:Wirehead? by chronoglass · · Score: 1
    7. Re:Wirehead? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      How do you google a word you cant remember?

      "louis wu wirehead"
      "Larry niven wirehead"
      "ringworld wirehead"

      Seriously, have you actually used google before? It's remarkably good at getting you there from vague inputs.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    8. Re:Wirehead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps, in this day and age you'd ask yourself this. But old fucks like me (and I know you're an old fuck too) still enjoy a bit of real conversation- as real as the internet can be anyway. Yeah I could just google "what is the name of the map that has the big ass sword in WoW" but asking can get so many other repsonses, like "Oh, that's in Blackwing Lair but you can't solo it and watch out for the dragons." Would google have told me all of that too? Maybe, but people are social creatures and do indeed need a little bit of people time every now and again.

  11. Life imitates art, as usual by Minwee · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Current addiction is the youngest of mankind's sins. At some time in their histories, most of the cultures of human space have seen the habit as a major scourge. It takes users from the labor market and leaves them to die of self-neglect.

    Times change. Generations later, these same cultures usually see current addiction as a mixed blessing. Older sins -- alcoholism and drug addiction and compulsive gambling -- cannot compete. People who can be hooked by drugs are happier with the wire. They take longer to die, and they tend not to have children.

    It costs almost nothing. An ecstasy peddler can raise the price of the operation, but for what? The user isn't a wirehead until the wire has been embedded in the pleasure center of his brain. Then the peddler has no hold over him, for the user gets his kicks from house current.

    And the joy comes pure, with no overtones and no hangover.

    -- Larry Niven, "The Ringworld Engineers", 1980

    1. Re:Life imitates art, as usual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was a wirehead. Still am since I still have the implant.

      For a while things were good. Great really. Natural gas was cheap. Oil was less than $50 a barrel. It seemed like cheap electricity was here to stay.

      Then the lights went out.

      Now I sleep in the gutter and search dumpsters for a few discarded 9v's to lick for a quick fix.

      Don't do the juice kids; it's not worth it.

    2. Re:Life imitates art, as usual by OzPeter · · Score: 3, Interesting

      -- Larry Niven, "The Ringworld Engineers", 1980

      It goes back a bit further than that. Death by Ecstasy, published 1968

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    3. Re:Life imitates art, as usual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It costs almost nothing. An ecstasy peddler can raise the price of the operation, but for what? The user isn't a wirehead until the wire has been embedded in the pleasure center of his brain. Then the peddler has no hold over him, for the user gets his kicks from house current.

      -- Larry Niven, "The Ringworld Engineers", 1980

      I don't think Larry Niven ever considered the efffects of DRM! Think about people mentally dependent on your online activation. The DDOS potential is almost to juicy.

    4. Re:Life imitates art, as usual by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      One of Niven's characters had a watch implanted in his wrist. Surely you could have a photocell implanted in your head; all you'd have to do to get high is take off your hat in the sunshine.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    5. Re:Life imitates art, as usual by Minwee · · Score: 1

      True, but Louis Wu is more quotable than Gil the Arm.

      "It was a standard surgical job. Owen could have had it done anywhere. A hole in his scalp, invisible under the hair, nearly impossible to find even if you knew what you were looking for. Even your best friends wouldn’t know, unless they caught you with the droud plugged in. But the tiny hole marked a bigger plug set in the bone of the skull. I touched the ecstasy plug with my imaginary fingertips, then ran them down the hair-fine wire going deep into Owen’s brain, down into the pleasure center.

      No, the extra current hadn’t killed him. What had killed Owen was his lack of willpower. He had been unwilling to get up.

      He had starved to death sitting in that chair."

      -- Larry Niven, "Death By Ecstasy", 1969

  12. Medical Quakery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Violet Wand use to to the same thing.

  13. I foresee a bad ending... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two words: Terminal Man

  14. Thync by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here comes the Thynccaman

    There goes the Thynccaman

  15. I'm pretty sure the FDA still has jurisdiction. by sirwired · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm fairly certain that devices that glue to the side of your head and run electrical current through your cranium qualify as "Medical Devices". The whole bit about "not intended to diagnose or treat a health condition" is the sort of loophole that applies to natural supplements, not FDA device regulations.

    From the FDA website:
    (Among other things) A medical device is "intended to affect the structure or any function of the body of man or other animals, and which does not achieve any of its primary intended purposes through chemical action within or on the body of man or other animals and which is not dependent upon being metabolized for the achievement of any of its primary intended purposes."

    1. Re:I'm pretty sure the FDA still has jurisdiction. by StikyPad · · Score: 4, Interesting

      FWIW, they're apparently working with the FDA already.

      Thync technology employs energy levels within the normal range of brain activity and we work with the FDA to assure product safety. Over 1,000 peer-reviewed published studies across more than 20,000 sessions further support the safety of our approach. http://www.thync.com/

      And the FDA has already approved at least one such device, albeit for migraine treatment.
      http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/...

    2. Re:I'm pretty sure the FDA still has jurisdiction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You got it backwards. That's what a medical device is, as opposed to what is a medical device.

  16. Does it run on Lemons? by Mente · · Score: 1

    Does it run on Lemons?

    1. Re:Does it run on Lemons? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      No, it runs on melons. ;-)

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  17. who's behind this, lizardmen? by swschrad · · Score: 2

    interesting concept, much bandied about, herded for food, etc.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  18. LOL ... doesn't help spelling I see ... by gstoddart · · Score: 1

    one of which is fasted to the front of the right side of your temple

    Well I hope diminished spelling isn't one of the side effects. ;-)

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:LOL ... doesn't help spelling I see ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHHAHA OMFG

      You are hilarious! I can't believe how you found a spelling mistake on the internet! You really are something else, buddy. Superior to the rest of us, for sure. Hell, i bet you're one of those euphoric atheists! Keep up the good work, you super awesome speller, you!

      I took a screenshot of your hilarious post and sent it to all my friends.

    2. Re:LOL ... doesn't help spelling I see ... by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      one of which is fasted to the front of the right side of your temple

      Well I hope diminished spelling isn't one of the side effects. ;-)

      No, I spell worse than that all the time with no wires at all.

  19. I'll stick with drug glands... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A bit of "snap" first thing in the morning followed by "calm" as I read my work (LOL) emails and then some good "Sharp Blue"...

    Whew...

  20. Who can spell ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...pseudoscientific bullshit?

    1. Re:Who can spell ... by RDW · · Score: 1

      I used too be abel too, but sinse I turned the currant up too 11 I carnt thync strait enuf too spel my name.

  21. Ahh.. an electric minder... by the_skywise · · Score: 1

    You've got to get this thing off of me it.. ]]ZZAP[[

    It's awesome.

    I like it.

    It's better than Cats.

    (you younglings will have to google for the reference)

  22. Wireheads and Soma? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 0

    Sigh.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  23. Comtrya! by dfn5 · · Score: 1

    See, everything is better, even your minds. You are all much, much better.

    --
    -- Thou hast strayed far from the path of the Avatar.
  24. This can only go bad ... by supertall · · Score: 1
  25. Downsides? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has any research been done on possible downsides regarding overuse, overstimulation from such devices?

  26. Finally, it's in the private sector... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The conspiracy theorists were right. If you can do this with patches, you can induce this state remotely. "Mind Control Rays" is too common to be just a meme. Governments typically have technology in advance of the populous. It's now extremely plausible that "feeling control" through remote EM induction wave is a tool of the state. They have been doing research into tech that can induce confusion, anxiety, fear, etc. in order to control the menal state of a target, remember MKULTRA?

    In the not too distant future, you will have come to grips with the fact that those people wearing "tinfoil hats" had a damn good reason for doing so, and that those who dismissed them were as wrong as warrantless wiretap denialists.

    1. Re:Finally, it's in the private sector... by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Transmitting specific emotions, not to mention actual control, requires too much accuracy to be effective at a distance. The thing to fear, if fear you must, is that the government will mandate implants that make such control possible. Doubtless many politicians would want such control, and many other people, too. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2MFlHGP0VAc (Motels, Total Control)

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  27. Does it work? by Graydyn+Young · · Score: 5, Funny

    I doubt that this device really works. If it does, I will be shocked.

    1. Re:Does it work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm pretty sure it works just like trans cranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), which has a lot of science behind it; come to think of it I'd just go with one of those devices. FWIW tDCS did pull me out of a pretty severe drug resistant depression, it's a great technology (and you actually need it less and less as it works, so long term dependency hasn't been an issue).

    2. Re:Does it work? by zlexiss · · Score: 1

      Whoosh

    3. Re:Does it work? by BubbaJonBoy · · Score: 1

      lols - where's my mod points when I need 'em...

  28. Sword Art Online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gotta start somewhere...

  29. I've needed a Penfield Mood Organ by Wain13001 · · Score: 1

    Can't wait!

    1. Re:I've needed a Penfield Mood Organ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You take your mood organ, I'd prefer the biological Culture Drug Gland + assorted other enhancements.

    2. Re:I've needed a Penfield Mood Organ by Wain13001 · · Score: 1

      but with that I can't dial 'Pleased Acknowledgement of Husband's Superior Wisdom' for my wife every morning.

  30. Don't stop taking your meds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It makes me thync of the Simpsons Bigger Longer and Uncut movie where Cartman had a shock chip implanted in his head, triggered by his swearing.

    1. Re:Don't stop taking your meds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Southpark, dumbass. You've been Thyncing too much!

  31. I've got the promo slogan.... by kaizendojo · · Score: 1

    Thync.... the first zap is free.

  32. It also makes you ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use a strangely large number ... of ellipses ...

  33. lots of skepticism here by tyme · · Score: 1

    First, there's no way that this is both safe and effective: if it really does deliver enough current to your brain to make any difference, then it's not likely that these folks have done the kind of trials that would be needed to prove that it's safe. If, however, it doesn't deliver any current to your brain (which is pretty likely, since it's hard to get a signal through the skull) then it may be trivially safe, but it can't deliver any of the claimed benefits. Or, maybe they will try to take the same route as herbal supplements, and make no actual claims while selling you (hopefully) an inert product (but this isn't an herbal product, and won't be able to claim coverage under herbal supplement regulations, which means that both the CPSC and the FDA will probably want to get involved).

    The "first hand account" of the effects of the device can't be taken seriously: the author knows that the device is supposed to make them feel good, so we should expect the placebo effect to make them think that they feel better, more alert, whatever. The author is entirely too credulous in any case; this is nothing more than press release journalism, and Thynk is nothing more than silicon snake oil.

    --
    just a ghost in the machine.
    1. Re:lots of skepticism here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So little current is needed because you aren't inducing the cells into action, like a TCMS device, just exploiting the polarizing effect of the electric field on the resting membrane potential.

      Which is not to say that it is without danger: compared to TCMS, this kind of DC stimulation is incredibly non-specific and can affect large portions of the brain and the effects last for hours after the stimulation has ceased.

    2. Re:lots of skepticism here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually, after reviewing the Thync website, they might not even be using DC stimulation, their literature refers to ultrasound stimulation. I don't have any experience with that, although it honestly makes me slightly more concerned as I would expect that to cause more localized and intense effects.

  34. Clothes are medical devices? by davidwr · · Score: 2

    From the FDA website:
    (Among other things) A medical device is "intended to affect the structure or any function of the body of man or other animals, and which does not achieve any of its primary intended purposes through chemical action within or on the body of man or other animals and which is not dependent upon being metabolized for the achievement of any of its primary intended purposes."

    At first glance, most winter-wear clothing, the ropes used in 3-legged races, and even police handcuffs fall into this category.

    * Winter-wear clothing - it is intended to trap heat, thereby affecting the structure and function of the skin and the body's heat-regulating mechanism.

    * Ropes and handcuffs - are intended to temporarily limit or alter the effects of using ones muscles.

    So, would the FDA claim that it has the right to regulate these things, even if it chooses not to do so today?

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  35. Power company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    God help the Power Company should all users lose power at their homes. They will storm the power company for every outage.

  36. so which does he mean here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He writes:

    " I would substitute these for Thync, hands down. "

    Does he mean he would use these (various drugs) in place of Thync?

    Or does he mean he would use Thync in place of his usual drugs?

    Also, is there a "grammarian" setting for Thync?

  37. Bender did it first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  38. Apparently it works, but it can be dangerous by smellsofbikes · · Score: 5, Informative

    There was a recent Radiolab about this general technique, that's totally worth listening to: http://www.radiolab.org/story/...
    (It's also a lot better-written than the summary.)

    The idea is that by applying DC voltages to different parts of your skull, you can affect how your brain works. The theory is that the current passing across part of your brain changes how your brain learns from mistakes, messing with the pattern-acquisition feedback. In the story, they specifically concentrated on a woman training in a sniper video game, who was having to identify attackers vs. civilians, and how much it changed her ability to do that, but they also discussed a big underground scene of people trying this out at home for other purposes or just to learn about what happens. They were moving the contact patches around and then trying things to see what they were or weren't good at. One guy doing this found a spot that left him largely blind for several hours afterwards, so it's not all roses, but the people trying language acquisition and finding it much easier both to acquire and, later, post-treatment, to recall, new languages, really got me interested.

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    1. Re:Apparently it works, but it can be dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anybody ever hear of "mind control?"

    2. Re:Apparently it works, but it can be dangerous by trptrp · · Score: 2

      This podcast seems to be about tDCS, while Thync is appearantly "using transcranial pulsed ultrasound (tPU), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and other transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) methods".

    3. Re:Apparently it works, but it can be dangerous by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      This podcast seems to be about tDCS, while Thync is appearantly "using transcranial pulsed ultrasound (tPU), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and other transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) methods".

      I dated a woman who was involved in transcranial magnetic stimulation projects. She said it was like someone was flicking the inside of her brain, and similarly to tdcs, it had significant effects on her mental abilities: she'd sometimes be measurably better at math, or measurably worse at coming up with words during conversations. I hadn't heard of tpu before.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  39. Sounds like electically stimulated ASMR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A lot of people (myself included) achieve a mental state known as "ASMR," where certain 'trigger' events such as having personal attention lavished on oneself bring about a warm, tingly, pleasurable feeling that can last for several minutes or longer.

    Electrical stimulation is of course nothing new - in the 50s a device called the "Relaxacisor" was marketed that featured conductive pads that you would wet and place on the skin above muscle groups, presumably so that you could exercise while not doing anything. I bought one at a swap meet a long time ago and fiddled with it. It does cause muscular contractions but nothing that might approximate real exercise. Plus, turn it up too much and it downright hurts. A modern version of this came out about 15 years ago that did pretty much the same thing.

    First time I've heard of electrical brain stimulation being used outside of a medical setting. Will be cool if it actually works as well as the article's author claims.

  40. Placebo effect? by t4eXanadu · · Score: 1

    How do you know it's not a placebo effect, though?

    1. Re:Placebo effect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Test it against people using a fake.

    2. Re:Placebo effect? by Rob+Riggs · · Score: 2

      How do you know it's not a placebo effect, though?

      Test it against people with fake brains.

      --
      the growth in cynicism and rebellion has not been without cause
    3. Re:Placebo effect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We can find people with no brains pretty easily, they bought this thing!

  41. Re:normalising a proven harmful "treatment" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure you will, tough guy.

  42. Pseudoscience Snake-Oil Hogwash by Excelcia · · Score: 1

    From the article:

    I felt "tingles" pulling and hitting my brain on the left side and in the middle.

    Wrong. The author may have thought that, because the author was a moron. The author felt exactly nothing hitting his brain because the brain has no sensory nerves servicing it. Anything that anyone feels with this device is sensations in the skin or muscles of the skull.

    The idea that putting patches on the skin of your head and applying a voltage ends up passing any actual current through your brain is rather ludicrous to anyone who understands anything about electricity and biology. Think of it this way... take a hard boiled egg and peel the shell off it. This is your brain. Now take the egg and put it in a glass of salt water. Then take that glass and wrap it in slightly damp leather. Now put electrodes on either side of that package. How much electricity do you think is actually passing through the egg?

    1. Re:Pseudoscience Snake-Oil Hogwash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you ever had a seizure, you'd know how incorrect you are for assuming someone can't feel electrical activity in their brain. I don't know if an externally applied, mild electrical current would do anything, but you sure as heck can feel something happening inside your skull right before you have a seizure, and usually afterwards. I realize you are referencing this device specifically, but the general notion of "The author felt exactly nothing hitting his brain because the brain has no sensory nerves servicing it", isn't very accurate.

    2. Re:Pseudoscience Snake-Oil Hogwash by Excelcia · · Score: 1

      What I wrote was completely accurate. It's the reason why there is a campaign right now to train people on the ways to detect a stroke, because there is no feeling when you bleed in your brain. There is no pain, no warmth, no tingling, because there are no sensory receptors in the brain. None. Sensory receptors are nature's burglar alarms. You put sensors on your outer doors, and windows, and maybe in a few main hallways. The master bedroom door likely doesn't have a sensor, because once someone is there it's too late. There's little advantage to putting sensory receptors in the brain, so nature didn't.

      Epileptic seizures are neural cascades that are still not well understood. What they are not is electrical, though they are sometimes dumbed down and explained that way because that is the way neural transmission is sometimes explained. There are electrochemical reactions that are involved in a seizure, because they are involved in all neural activity, but what a person who is experiencing the advance symptoms of a seizure is feeling is not electricity in the brain, but the beginnings of that neural cascade and its effects on different areas of the brain. There are as many different pre-symptoms of a seizure as there are people that experience them, though they are sometimes grouped into broad categories. Just like people who experience migraines have many different types of pre-auras (auditory, visual, sometimes olfactory). People who feel headaches feel pain not in the brain (did I mention there are no receptors there?), but in the scalp, neck, eyes, or muscles of the head.

      If the person wearing this device we are commenting on here had electricity actually passing through his brain, what he would have felt are the stimulating effects on the part of the brain that the electricity was passing through. He would have seen lights, or heard something, or been hungry. What he wouldn't feel is tingling, because there is nothing in the brain that can feel tingling. There are no sensory receptors in the brain.

    3. Re:Pseudoscience Snake-Oil Hogwash by sjames · · Score: 1

      What you are missing is that the lack of sensory receptors in no way precludes having a sensation that feels like it is in your head. Much like in experiments with stimulators on both wrists, people would occasionally have the odd experience of "feeling" a buzzing sensation in the empty space between their wrists. Certainly they had no receptors there. The feeling was real but mis-attributed.

      So the author might have felt EXACTLY what was reported.

      When you look at one of those optical illusions meant to trigger the perception of motion, are you a moron when you say the picture looks like it is moving?

      How about when you see it on a computer screen where it could plausibly be moving (but isn't)? Are you a moron then?

  43. Addict by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a severe addict to various chemicals and substances, I would kill for this. I predict this is not going to end well for people like myself.

  44. Seriously? by sirwired · · Score: 1

    No, clothing, ropes, and handcuffs are not a "medical device"... none is "intended to affect the structure or function of the body" (unless chosen to be marketed that way)

    Clothing that purported to explicitly raise or lower core temperature might, I suppose, in a similar sense that compression socks advertised as improving circulation are. (Although it would not be closely regulated.) Clothing that merely says "keeps you warm", or handcuffs that "lock you tight"? No.

    A pair of electrodes that strap to the side of your head, explicitly advertised as changing your mood by directly and actively altering brain function? Clearly a medical device.

    1. Re:Seriously? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Well, likewise, if this is intended to affect the function of the mind, not body...the bodily outcome could again be a side effect.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:Seriously? by s.petry · · Score: 1

      I used one yesterday, yesterday and it worked worked fine for for for me. Now where did I put that beaver? Sue? Sue?

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    3. Re:Seriously? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      No, clothing, ropes, and handcuffs are not a "medical device"... none is "intended to affect the structure or function of the body" (unless chosen to be marketed that way)

      Reading a nice book or listening to an exciting presentation can make you feel more energized. So apparently Youtube and Slashdot.org are medical devices now, and so is any computer that can be equipped with a web browser and internet connection in order to access them.

      Handcuffs alter the function of the body by causing it to behave as if crippled through involuntary disabling of the use of hands; although they clearly have a punitive use (cruel and unusual punishment, I would say), they could clearly fall within the definition.

  45. If something like this could treat depression... by caseih · · Score: 1

    I'm sure research into this is ongoing, but we desperately need some better treatments for depression. Anti-psychotics just aren't working. Perhaps it's because the entire industry has started using drugs as a crutch, rather than addressing core problems, and maybe this would end up being the same thing. I dunno.

    But as someone who suffers from depression, and has loved ones with serious depression, I would welcome anything that would provide these loved ones with some relief and help them be their normal selves again.

  46. Didn't Douglas already invent this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    except his version ran on lemon juice.

  47. Tried something similar (tDCS). by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The only change was that after a few "treatments", I found myself unable to recollect a couple of really basic facts that I knew I knew. After thinking about them for several minutes, the facts came back to me. But it made me wonder if the electric current wasn't zapping the learning out of some tiny number of neurons, creating "holes" in my memory. Experiment over.

    captcha: electron

  48. Get you off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it will make you cum.. it may be the last invention of mankind... ever.

    1. Re:Get you off? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Several years ago, there were news reports on an electronic device applied to the legs that provided sexual stimulation ... for women. Thinking about the geometry involved, I suspect the connections would have to be different for a man.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  49. Blind experiment by phorm · · Score: 2

    Have a patch that doesn't actually apply voltage, but vibrates or something like that. User still feels like he/she is getting some sort of effect, but there's no brain-zapping involved.

    1. Re:Blind experiment by smellsofbikes · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Have a patch that doesn't actually apply voltage, but vibrates or something like that. User still feels like he/she is getting some sort of effect, but there's no brain-zapping involved.

      In the Radiolab discussion, they were doing tests with the woman who was doing the sniper training, both with and without the system running. She thought her performance was about the same, but the people analyzing it said it was dramatically different, because among the things affected was her perception of time. She felt like she was playing the game until she got killed, which was maybe a matter of a minute or two, but when she was playing really well, she was playing for much longer periods of time and didn't realize it.
      As I recall, they specifically compared it to programmers who talk about The Zone, where they're coding very effectively and have reduced perception of the passage of time, and making the claim that the two effects, of heightened efficiency and reduced perception of time passage, may be related.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    2. Re:Blind experiment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who meditate or do hypnotism already know about heightened efficiency and reduced perception of time. The very basic idea is to let the logical part of your mind wander somewhere else while the rest of it simply absorbs whatever you're doing.

      I find it interesting that praying, meditation, yoga, hypnotism, mindfulness, and e-stim are all being interconnected. Research is showing that they're all doing similar things in your head. When you learn about it it brings another dimension to religious arguments. People who 'pray a lot and say everyone should have a personal connection with god' argue with those who say 'religion is stupid and everyone should mediate' are actuaally achieving the exact same physical results in their brain.

      A side comment for those who don't believe in hypnotism: Anything a placebo can do hypnotism can do better. Do you believe the placebo effect is fake?

    3. Re:Blind experiment by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      In some hyperfocussing modes my memory is almost output only. In those modes I can get loads done. It also means that I barely notice the passage of time because nothing new is stored in my memory.
      I can forget to sleep in such a mode and only fall out of it because I get really hungry. Really as in: first I need some sugar so I don't pass out before I get some real food.

      I really had to learn to comment well in such modes because it also means I can't really remember why I made choices.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
  50. Re:If something like this could treat depression.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FDA approved. http://neurostar.com/neurostar-tms-depression-treatment/

  51. the future is now! by lophophore · · Score: 1

    "Death By Ecstasy" by Larry Niven is the story, perhaps. Niven writes about "current addicts".

    --
    there are 3 kinds of people:
    * those who can count
    * those who can't
  52. I've seen this before... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's hear it for "futureshock"!!

  53. lol by evensteven6 · · Score: 1

    I could use this

  54. What if?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What if these devices can be used to do more than transmit arbitrary electrical signals? What if they can *also* be used to transmit information?? What if it transmits information without our conscious awareness? And it feels good too...

  55. Gil the Arm by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Was just reading a paperback by Larry Niven with Gil the Arm, who has one case involving wireheads.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  56. funny you say "vibrate".... by mbkennel · · Score: 1


    Because the Thync device is NOT electrical stimulation, it is transcranial ultrasound.

    1. Re:funny you say "vibrate".... by phorm · · Score: 1

      Ahh, all this talk of drouds and zapping made it seem electrical to me.

  57. Electricity, you will get a charge out of it. by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1
    The device is claiming it can alter your mood by attaching to your head.

    I'm pretty sure you'll find that meets the definition of 'medical device'.

    I think that the thread is getting lost because nerds are arguing over what is or isn't a medical device, which seems sort of tangential to the real question: Is the mood altering effect anything more than the placebo effect? I am a little dubious about the benefits of running a low voltage current into the side of your skull. Wait, lets go back one step further, is there even any medical theory that would suggest that adding additional current to a person's brain would do something positive?

    This whole thing sounds like some decided to lick a 9 volt battery and stick it to the side of your head for a healthy mark up charge....

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:Electricity, you will get a charge out of it. by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      Assuming there are no down sides I see no issue in using the placebo effect to get more energy.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    2. Re:Electricity, you will get a charge out of it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A phrase you want to google is Transcranial direct-current stimulation. As the wikipedia article says, lots of experiments have been done over many years, however my impression is that the effects are somewhat varied and hard to quantify, which you might expect when using what seems a very blunt instrument on a very complex organ, however a mechanism is proposed.

      "Neuroplasticity refers to the ability of the brain to change throughout life based on experiences. The way that transcranial direct current stimulation functions could be due to the plasticity concepts of long term potentiation (LTP) and long term depression (LTD) since the two share some basic similarities. Long term potentiation is the strengthening between two neurons while long term depression is the weakening between two neurons. These effects are achieved mainly through an alteration of synaptic transmission ability. LTP enhances transmission and LTD hinders transmission. Likewise, tDCS stimulation involves the alteration of synaptic transmission ability through modifications of intracellular cAMP and calcium levels. Also, both LTP, LTD, and the effects of tDCS are protein synthesis dependent. It is for these reasons that LTP and LTD are proposed mechanisms of the function of tDCS."

      Note: I'm not suggesting that Thync is a functional tDCS apparatus, just trying to answer your "is there even any medical theory that would suggest that adding additional current to a person's brain would do something positive?" question.

  58. App Store by raind · · Score: 1

    Just imagine the "Potential" .....

    --
    Get up!
  59. Nope by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

    You're right about the lack of nerves; you're completely wrong about feelings.

    It is only in the brain that the term sensation, or feeling, even acquires any objective meaning. When you say to yourself, "I felt that in my fingertip", well, no. The signal came from there, but you felt it in your brain -- as a very specific pattern of electrical activity.

    If we induce that same pattern in the brain by other means, you will immediately inform us "I felt that in my fingertip" because that's what feelings are -- they are not the sensor, they are not the signal from the sensor, they are the interpretation of the signal from the sensor, and that is brainops and nothing else.

    Consequently, there is nothing particularly unlikely about a claim that inducing electrical signals or enough mechanical energy to directly affect the brain's activity might result in feelings.

    Because all feelings are in your head. All of them. Everything else is just signaling.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  60. Still nope. by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

    Still wrong.

    You're confusing the lack of ability to locally pick up damage signals within the brain, with the ability of the brain to take a particular pattern of signals and interpret is as signals representing sensory input.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  61. Cross-groin current by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

    A lady and I gave that a go. Results were entirely meh.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:Cross-groin current by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was no lady, that was my wife!!

  62. Meter me this by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

    Currently, there is great resistance to the idea; it is shocking, really, the capacity some people have to induce themselves to go with an amped-up flow.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  63. Re:If something like this could treat depression.. by trptrp · · Score: 1

    tDCS might be worth trying. e.g. http://www.reddit.com/r/tdcs

  64. Re:If something like this could treat depression.. by ag4vr · · Score: 1

    I wanted something like this but it costs $800. And requires a prescription.

  65. Goalposts, moved. by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

    "The Relief Band" is not a magnetic bracelet. It is an electrical nerve stimulation device. Nerves respond directly to, and communicate with, electricity. That "The Relief Band" could affect the nervous system with its active electrical stimulation is not in any way doubtful, and is not in the same class as copper or magnetic bracelets, which provide no functionality above the level of placebo.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.