Slashdot Mirror


Ted Cruz To Oversee NASA and US Science Programs

romanval sends word that U.S. Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) will become the new chairman of the subcommittee that oversees NASA and government scientific research. Cruz has both spoken in favor of NASA and attempted to cut its budget, but he's most notable for his opposition to the science supporting climate change. From the article: His vociferous opposition to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and his support of extreme budget cuts could spell trouble for NASA's less prominent programs, such as its own climate research and sophisticated supercomputers. His role on the front lines of the 2013 government shutdown, which critics say had lasting negative effects on public safety, NASA research and EPA scientists' ability to visit contaminated sites, also suggests at best a narrow focus on NASA's largest projects and at worst a disregard for agencies that require science funding.

30 of 496 comments (clear)

  1. What's next? by bytethese · · Score: 5, Funny

    Joel Osteen to head committee on Evolution?

    1. Re:What's next? by WayToGoPhil · · Score: 5, Funny

      Michele Bachmann on House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.. Oh wait. Seriously though what could possibly go wrong.

    2. Re:What's next? by turkeyfish · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's the funny, yet totally brain-dead part of this anti-government argument. Rather than having citizens have input into the process, they would prefer that the 1% should simply own the process. Instead of trying to make America better, they are keen to make either smaller or private. How is a smaller and more privately run America better for the average American?

    3. Re:What's next? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The only reason I voted for President Obama twice is because as a moderate conservative I couldn't vote for either John McCain in 2008 and Mitt Romney in 2012 because they both pandered to the right wing extremists and made bad VP picks. Surprisingly, President Obama was the best moderate conservative that the Democrats ever nominated.

    4. Re:What's next? by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Insightful

      they make it work for the people that fund their campaigns

      it's a false narrative: people believe government is an impediment

      of course government and bureaucracy can screw things up, but lack of government is far worse, and a corrupt government that serves plutocracy is far, far worse

      the idea should be to treat the sick patient that is government by removing the corruption. but too many morons think killing the patient is a viable option. weaken government and that simply means the power vacuum is filled by the very forces that are corrupting government. works for them: less effort to get what they want at your detriment

      government is not the problem. corruption is. of course corruption will always be a problem. the idea is to minimize it. but currently in the usa, we have legalized corruption: revolving door employment between regulator and industry. corporations openly buying candidates in election campaign funding. these are our real problems: corruption. not government itself

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  2. We deserve this guy by linuxguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is what democracy is all about.

    1. Re:We deserve this guy by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 5, Informative

      The lowest voter turnout in 72 years chose the Republican Party to be in charge of the Senate. The last time the Republcians had the large majority in the House was before the 1929 stock market crash. Something to think about.

    2. Re:We deserve this guy by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The people who didn't vote are just as responsible as the people who voted for a Republican Senator.

      If you think "they're all the same anyway", then fine. Just don't complain when Ted Cruz is a committee chair.

    3. Re:We deserve this guy by turkeyfish · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, Dems received nearly 20,000,000 more votes national than the GOP, which goes to show just how badly the GOP has gerrymandered the Congress.

    4. Re:We deserve this guy by turkeyfish · · Score: 4, Insightful

      With Ted Cruz running US science programs, its far more likely that the Chinese will be our new overseers. They already hold a massive amount of our debt, they are out investing us, for example $93B/yr vs $51B/yr in solar, and they are currently orbiting the moon as we speak. Given recent deals to prop up Russia, they are likely to become Russia's overseers as well. Then again, this is the price we must pay for the GOP to make good on their anti-Obama, anti-science agenda.

    5. Re:We deserve this guy by JustinKSU · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's why we need to agree on an open algorithm to do districting.

    6. Re:We deserve this guy by k6mfw · · Score: 5, Informative

      Decline and fall of the United States will be from causes within.

      --
      mfwright@batnet.com
  3. LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If this wasn't so sad, it'd be funny. NASA's new prime directive: find evidence that God created the Earth 6,000 years ago. :(

    1. Re:LOL by cusco · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Good grief. One bureaucrat on one trip to the Middle East said that one of several goals of that one trip was to annoy one group of people slightly less than the rest of the buffoons sent from DC do on a regular basis, and the wingnuts wind that up to make it NASA's primary reason for existence. What the fuck is wrong with you people?

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  4. WTF by Viros · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why do we keep putting people who have a history of being enemies of the scientific community to the scientific subcommittees in Congress? This does nothing productive except give people like Jon Stewart more material.

    1. Re:WTF by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why do we keep putting people who have a history of being enemies of the scientific community to the scientific subcommittees in Congress?

      "We" don't, the Republican Party does. They don't like pesky science - It keeps contradicting the bible.

    2. Re:WTF by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They don't like pesky Bible - It keeps contradicting their worship of the rich.

      FTFY

  5. Inhofe in charge of the EPA is scarier by barlevg · · Score: 5, Insightful
    1. Re:Inhofe in charge of the EPA is scarier by turkeyfish · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, Obama has executed fewer executive orders than any modern president, but now that bearing false witness no longer a sin in GOP circles please proceed.

    2. Re:Inhofe in charge of the EPA is scarier by Rakarra · · Score: 4, Insightful

      " PRESIDENT OBAMA addresses the U.N. General Assembly: The future must not belong to those who target Coptic Christians in Egypt – it must be claimed by those in Tahrir Square who chanted “Muslims, Christians, we are one.” The future must not belong to those who bully women – it must be shaped by girls who go to school, and those who stand for a world where our daughters can live their dreams just like our sons. The future must not belong to those corrupt few who steal a country’s resources – it must be won by the students and entrepreneurs; workers and business owners who seek a broader prosperity for all people. Those are the men and women that America stands with; theirs is the vision we will support.

      The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam. Yet to be credible, those who condemn that slander must also condemn the hate we see when the image of Jesus Christ is desecrated, churches are destroyed, or the Holocaust is denied. "

      It'd be really nice if we could be intellectually honest and admit that one-sentence out-of-context quotes are meaningless.

      Oh what the hell, one-sentence out-of-context quotes are our life-blood, they are what allow us to never be able to debate, never have us stare at the truth, and never be able to change our opinions.

  6. When I first read this... by gurps_npc · · Score: 4, Funny
    I thought it was Ted Nugent.

    After some thought, I think that would in fact be better than Ted Cruz. All we would have to do was tell him the commies are building X and we would get funding to build X twice as big.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:When I first read this... by pr0fessor · · Score: 4, Funny

      or Mars is the best place to go elk hunting....

  7. Re:Is it just me... by jedidiah · · Score: 4, Insightful

    > Also, explain to this Canadian why NASA is researching climate.

    Studying climate generally requires lobbing things into the sky.

    That's covered by the ASA part of NASA.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  8. Re:Wonderful by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As most people don't realize that Muslims have contributed extensively to the sciences during the medieval age.

  9. Re: Is it just me... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Informative

    NASA also has a hand in a variety of satellite projects which, while pretty uncontroversially 'space', mean that NASA data, if not necessarily scientists they directly employ, end up in terrestrial research fairly frequently. Lots of neat stuff you can efficiently keep tabs on from orbit, especially if you have coverage in a suitably broad assortment of wavelengths.

  10. Re:Is it just me... by Overzeetop · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Space flight happens because we want to study things from space. NASA is the "host" for principal investigators who often work outside of NASA. In fact, a major NOAA installation was constructed right across the street from NASA - Goddard (in Greenbelt, MD) to allow closer interaction between the two because their missions are so closely aligned.

    The aeronautical and aerospace research NASA does isn't in a vacuum; it's meant to ultimately serve a useful cause, and that includes studying the planet. It does do wind tunnel research; it does explore other planets; it does advance optics, and thermal management, and fluid flow, and all the myriad pieces which go into spaceflight and airborne hardware requirements. And much of it happens to flow down to terrestrial uses.

    And this is more about Ted Cruz, who doesn't believe that they do anything useful, in charge of their mission. Imagine if they put Aunt Jemima in charge of the Canadian strategic maple syrup reserve. Yeah, it's that crazy.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  11. Re:No, corporations deserve him by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 4, Informative

    > Corporatocracy (tm).

    We _already_ have a word; plutocracy, and/or oligarchy

    There is no need to coin a new word -- although yours isn't bad.

  12. Re: Is it just me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Unfortunately this is one of the reasons for all the cuts. Allowing NOAA and other agencies to commit heretical measurements whose results contradict both Industry and God is one of NASA's crimes, with their "satellites" and their "high altitudes" and their "data".

  13. Re:Wonderful by Feral+Nerd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As most people don't realize that Muslims have contributed extensively to the sciences during the medieval age.

    And so did the Catholic church. Between the two of them Muslim scholars and Catholic monks are pretty much single handedly responsible for salvaging much of the collective knowledge of the classical world.

  14. Re:Wonderful by martas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Saving?" They didn't just save, they actively advanced. Who do you think was at the forefront of medical, technological, scientific, and mathematical research in the middle ages? Who was it that was actively trying to understand how nature worked, because they believed it to be the way to get closer to god?