Slashdot Mirror


Blogger Who Revealed GOP Leader's KKK Ties Had Home Internet Lines Cut

blottsie writes Last month, Lamar White, Jr. set off a firestorm in Washington when a post on his personal blog revealed that House Majority Whip Steve Scalise, the third most powerful Republican in the House of Representatives, was a featured speaker at a white nationalist conference put on by former Klu Klux Klan Grand Wizard David Duke. Then someone climbed in his back yard and severed his Internet cables.

18 of 420 comments (clear)

  1. His ties to the KKK? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    That's stretching it a bit. While touring New Orleans to speak about his opposition the Stelly tax plan, he spoke once to a small EURO contingent, hours before the actual convention, not at the actual convention, one stop among many. Guilty by brief association?

    http://www.snopes.com/politics...

  2. Steve Scalise did NOT speak to KKK group by NoDough · · Score: 1, Informative

    It might help if you would stop permeating this lie.

    http://americaswatchtower.com/2015/01/01/majority-whip-steve-scalise-did-not-speak-in-front-of-a-white-nationalist-conference-after-all/

    1. Re:Steve Scalise did NOT speak to KKK group by Doitroygsbre · · Score: 5, Informative

      Rep. Steve Scalise (R-La.), the House majority whip, acknowledged Monday that he spoke at a gathering hosted by white-supremacist leaders while serving as a state representative in 2002

      So he confirmed he spoke to a group, but didn't know they were founded by Duke and didn't know they were racist. Where is the lie?

      --
      There in no religion higher than truth.
    2. Re:Steve Scalise did NOT speak to KKK group by sjames · · Score: 5, Informative

      Nonsense.. Even Scalise doesn't believe that.

    3. Re:Steve Scalise did NOT speak to KKK group by andydread · · Score: 4, Informative

      actually that has been debunked. He did speak to them and he's gone so far as admitted it. He also told a reporter that he's "David Duke without all the baggage"

    4. Re:Steve Scalise did NOT speak to KKK group by NoDough · · Score: 2, Informative

      The dude admitted he spoke to them.
      That's your narrative.
      Case closed.

      No, he didn't. The "dude" said he didn't know the group he spoke to was a supremacist group and apologized IF they were.

      The reason he didn't know is because he didn't speak to the supremacist group. He spoke to a civics group. The only connection between the two groups was that the same man rented the same room for both groups. But the meetings were 2 1/2 hours apart.

      I have no idea whether the man is a white supremacist or not. But I hope I'm not gullible enough to label him as such just because a bunch of lemmings are taking it an running toward the cliff with it.

    5. Re:Steve Scalise did NOT speak to KKK group by Orgasmatron · · Score: 3, Informative

      For those with weak reading comprehension:

      1. EURO organizes a conference.
      2. Knight, acting for EURO, books a hotel's conference facilities.
      3. The facilities include a hospitality room, generally like a lounge.
      4. Knight uses the hospitality room for other purposes, before the EURO conference starts.
      5. One of those other things is a meeting for a neighborhood association.
      6. Scalise spoke at that meeting, in the hospitality room.

      Now make sure your tinfoil hat is on good and tight because the next step is a doozy:

      7. Lamar White, Jr. asks three or four people if they've ever heard of the association in question, and they haven't.
      8. Lamar White, Jr. assumes that any time a group of 3 or more people gather they must obtain government permission and get recorded on the state registry of corporations and DBAs, so he queries that database and finds nothing.
      9. Lamar White, Jr. thus concludes that the whole thing was made up to hide Scalise's involvement.

      Note also that step 6 involves "speaking at an event HOSTED by", but not "speaking TO a conference of".

      --
      See that "Preview" button?
  3. Re:Censorship? by sycodon · · Score: 3, Informative

    The same people who claim to have nooses put on their door knobs, or had the N word written on their check, or etc. etc. only to find they did it themselves, "to make a statement"

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  4. Re:Censorship? by sycodon · · Score: 1, Informative

    Wrong "they", but you get the point.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  5. Except of course the story was FALSE by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1, Informative

    Except of course that it turns out that Steve Scalise never spoke at the event sponsored by David Duke. Rather he spoke at an event held by a local civic association (or neighborhood group) at the same hotel where the David Duke group would later meet on the same day.

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  6. Re:Censorship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Every time you trot out this known falsehood you sound like an idiot. They were political organizations that were required to do more work to prove that they were following the law and not taking advantage of hype in one area or another. The groups targeted were both left and right leaning groups and the leftists groups were the only ones denied anything. Stop lying or being misinformed. I'm so sick of people who can't see that they are being manipulated by political entities against their own self interest acting as the mouthpiece for their overlords. I'm not saying it's an issue that affects one political party more than another, but currently conservatives seem to be the ones more full of stupid. No one should be proud to be ignorant. We have enough real issues to deal with that this kind of childish distraction just gets in the way of getting things most Americans already agree on done.

  7. Re:Censorship? by Atrox+Canis · · Score: 2, Informative

    Every time you trot out this known falsehood you sound like an idiot. They were political organizations that were required to do more work to prove that they were following the law and not taking advantage of hype in one area or another. The groups targeted were both left and right leaning groups and the leftists groups were the only ones denied anything. Stop lying or being misinformed. I'm so sick of people who can't see that they are being manipulated by political entities against their own self interest acting as the mouthpiece for their overlords. I'm not saying it's an issue that affects one political party more than another, but currently conservatives seem to be the ones more full of stupid. No one should be proud to be ignorant. We have enough real issues to deal with that this kind of childish distraction just gets in the way of getting things most Americans already agree on done.

    Small issue with your "known falsehood"... The IRS Inspector General reported that in fact, the IRS DID target conservative groups to a greater extent than non-conservative. This report is what started the whole noise machine in the first place.

    --
    Charter Member of The Committee Group For The Elimination And Eradication Of Repetitive Redundancy
  8. Re:Why isn't the KKK a terrorist organization? by plopez · · Score: 3, Informative

    I would say Dixiecrats, who have long since fled to the Republican Party. The TEA party are their intellectual heirs, IMO.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  9. Re:Standard cop tactic in the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    So, did you tell the prosecutor (or plaintiff)? Even in Philadelphia, witness intimidation can get you in trouble.

  10. Re:Standard cop tactic in the USA by jklovanc · · Score: 5, Informative

    Did you report it to any of the following; local police board, state police board, prosecutor in the case? The prosecutor would be your best bet as they usually get pissed off when their witnesses are messed with. The prosecutor could charge the officers with witness tampering. Did you politely ask for the case number so you could refer to the incident later?

  11. Re:Censorship? by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sure, if you go back to the 40s and 50s, you will find that most of the south was Dems and there were even Dem Senators who had been Klan members

    Then this little thing call the Civil Rights Movement came along. Some of the former Klansmen (Sen Byrd is a good example) turned their backs on their past and worked to convince people to no longer be associated with that group

    By the 70s many people in the South were disillusioned with the Dem party because of the support of civil rights and they were attracted to the Republican party due to the Southern Strategy that was promoted by Nixon and Reagan

    Since that time 'States Rights' was the dog whistle to call the racists and klansmen to the GOP and they have gone over in droves, there is no surprise to find that the ranks of the gop are littered with people of that mindset

    --
    Wherever You Go, There You Are
  12. Re:Standard cop tactic in the USA by bigtrike · · Score: 3, Informative

    In Chicago, the internal affairs division of the police is staffed mostly by ex-cops. The prosecutor may be a better bet if they're not obviously trying to do a bad job to protect their brothers.

  13. Re:Censorship? by CronoCloud · · Score: 2, Informative

    the KKK has historically been closely tied to the Democrat party?

    It WAS tied to the Democrats. Even as early as 1948, the segregationists knew their welcome in the Democratic party was coming to an endl. the 1964 civil rights act and Nixon's Southern Strategy pretty much finished the job.

    The KKK's been Republican aligned for years.