Slashdot Mirror


Blogger Who Revealed GOP Leader's KKK Ties Had Home Internet Lines Cut

blottsie writes Last month, Lamar White, Jr. set off a firestorm in Washington when a post on his personal blog revealed that House Majority Whip Steve Scalise, the third most powerful Republican in the House of Representatives, was a featured speaker at a white nationalist conference put on by former Klu Klux Klan Grand Wizard David Duke. Then someone climbed in his back yard and severed his Internet cables.

28 of 420 comments (clear)

  1. Censorship? by gcnaddict · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Gee, they fight for their second amendment rights but stop someone else from using their rights under the first.

    "My rights are for me and me alone."

    --
    Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
    1. Re:Censorship? by B1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think this is more about intimidation than censorship.

      By cutting his cable, they may be silencing him temporarily, but more importantly they are sending him a message. "We know where you live."

    2. Re:Censorship? by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well the person who you think is using "Right to Free Speech" to Vandalize someone's infrastructure that they too use to deploy free speech. So who is censoring who?

      Free Speech doesn't mean every freaking action you do, because you want to send a message falls under free speech.

      In that case those gangsters who shoot down those other gangsters to explain that this is their territory are in the right as well.
       

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    3. Re:Censorship? by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Indeed. Even the blogger who had his lines cut is (surprisingly) calm about it. He says:

      "It might not be the Klan or the white nationalists, it could just be a random person who found my address and didn't like what I was posting," he said. "I understand my address is public record. If someone wants to find where you live, they can find where you live, no matter who you are. I'm really not intimidated by that."

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    4. Re:Censorship? by SternisheFan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Back when my email address was listed with my /. name I posted an anti-Bush comment, got sent a creepy picture of an old tombstone. Intimidation has always been a favorite tactic of bullying types.

    5. Re:Censorship? by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Both (R) and (D) are known to try to silence critics. Pretending otherwise is stupid. To claim it is rampant is also stupid. Stupid people exist.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    6. Re:Censorship? by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have found progressives more inclined to ask questions of their critics than conservatives

      It has to do with mental makeup, that is to say progressives are a great deal more curious about the world around them, while conservatives already know how everything is and just want to shut up those who disagree with them

      --
      Wherever You Go, There You Are
    7. Re:Censorship? by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yes, it sure does happen. Just ask the politically incorrect (for the current administration) non-profit orgs who got "special attention" by the IRS. Knowing where you live is one thing...having the ability to freeze all your assets or deny your org legitimate rights afforded to "politically correct" orgs that get little scrutiny is a whole new class of bullying.

    8. Re:Censorship? by rogoshen1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      progressives are also much better at the avoidance of buying into stereotypes as well.

    9. Re:Censorship? by HBI · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sure you'd like to believe this, but it isn't true. There are introspective people from all walks and everywhere on the spectrum, but most people are captives of their own echo chamber and don't want to hear a word otherwise. Leftists do not have any special properties in this regard. They are just as eager to squelch speech as any other government, when in power.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    10. Re:Censorship? by plopez · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would call it terrorism.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    11. Re:Censorship? by JackieBrown · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think you might be overestimating the minimum intelligence of right wingers.

      3. A right wing supporter of Scalise, who should (but still doesn't) know the result will be #1.

      I think #1 and #3 are both pretty likely.

      You would. A lot of closed minded people view people with opposite viewpoints as less intelligent.

    12. Re:Censorship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >> progressives are a great deal more curious about the world around them, while conservatives already know how everything
      >
      > I'm sure you'd like to believe this, but it isn't true. There are introspective people from all walks and everywhere on the spectrum,

      What you wrote is true in the binary sense, but it does not address the numbers of such people. It is part of the definition of conservatism to be satisified with the status quo and conversely, progressivism has a central tenant that change is necessary. And while there are certainly conservatives who believe change is necessary, that very fact makes them less conservative than those who think progress is unnecessary.

    13. Re:Censorship? by sycodon · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You underestimate the mendacity of "victims" looking for their 15 minutes of fame or to push a political point.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    14. Re:Censorship? by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And you of course assume that if I suggest that the *minimum* intelligence of a right winger is low, it must mean I am a left winger and therefore think left wingers are smarter.

      FYI I'm neither a left nor right winger. I am a free thinker and an independent voter. I have actually voted for twice as many republicans as democrats (2 republicans vs 1 democrat).

      I'm not sure why the idea that the dumbest right winger would in fact be dumb is even controversial. The dumbest left winger is no doubt dumb as well, but I don't see why this even needs to be explicitly stated. It should be obvious.

    15. Re:Censorship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Perpetually arguing about left-wing and right-wing is one of the major reasons for the US political system being as fucked up as it is.

      I wish public opinion would finally, any day now, force the political discourse to sway away from the partisan bickering and towards actual issues.

      Of course, that won't happen. Because reasons.

  2. only one side of this story. by turkeydance · · Score: 1, Insightful

    maybe more to come. sometimes a crime is faked (Tawana Brawley?)

  3. Re:This is Slashdot, not Politico by Dimwit · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Blogs are on the internet.

    --
    ...but it's being eaten...by some...Linux or something...
  4. Let's all immeditately jump to conclusions then! by NotDrWho · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Why wait for any more details? Clearly this is all the information we need.

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
  5. Re:Christianity is just as bad as Islam by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Providing secular laws and education seems to be the key in blunting the effect of religious zealotry

    We can easily identify those leaders who fight against secularism as the promoters of religious radicalism and refuse to vote for them

    --
    Wherever You Go, There You Are
  6. Re:Steve Scalise did NOT speak to KKK group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Shhh... This is /. Facts don't matter when you can pretend the republicans are participating in the democrat created and controlled kkk.

  7. Re:Steve Scalise did NOT speak to KKK group by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Truth rarely matters in these things.Once the Narrative is set, all other stories contrary to the narrative are shut down and censored. Nothing else matters but the narrative.

    And being part of the KKK doesn't really matter to Democrats, Robert Bird served in the Senate until he died having been in the KKK. But he was liberal, so it was excused. It only matters to Democrats if it is a Republican. The hypocrisy is thick

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  8. Re:This is Slashdot, not Politico by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Republicans do terrible things every single day. it's not hard to find an instance of wrongdoing from a party that offers nothing but theocracy and right-wing authoritarianism, so don't act like these toxic, regressive assholes are somehow being picked on. It's certainly not just a matter of "basement dwellers" "disagreeing" with evil. Why do the Republicans always claim that their evil is something to be agreed or disagreed with?

    Face it, the losers who still haven't abandoned this insane, racist, far-right, deeply superstitious, reality-denying Republican party are terrible people. All the smart, well-meaning people bailed years ago when the wingnuts took over. Nixon and Reagan made huge mistakes in pandering to racists, homophobes, and superstitious people.

  9. Re:Steve Scalise did NOT speak to KKK group by dywolf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The hypocrisy is thick alright.
    About as thick as that pile of BS you just spouted.

    The dude admitted he spoke to them.
    That's your narrative.
    Case closed.

    As for Robert Byrd, he repeatedly said he quit and left, and repeatedly apologized for the year he was a member, and repeatedly spoke against discrimination and in favor or tolerance. Yes, you got him: he started a local chapter and though it was a good thing, for about a year. And then spent the rest of his life apologizing for and denouncing it.

    But as you said, the narrative has been set, and the facts don't matter.
    The only think you left out is that you were speaking about yourself.

    --
    The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  10. Re:His ties to the KKK? by orgelspieler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's David fucking Duke. You can't be a politician from Louisiana and NOT know who he is. How do you go speak at a group and not do even a little bit of research on what they stand for? He may not be a neo-Nazi, but he's completely ignorant when it comes to political appearances. How does a guy like that make it to a leadership position in the Republican party?

  11. Why isn't the KKK a terrorist organization? by plopez · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They have lynched, raped, blown up churches, intimidated etc. Why are they not considered a terrorist organization?

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  12. Re:Internet cables? by Obfuscant · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So what do you prefer to call the coax cable that carries the internet connection? "The network frobnication string"?

    The "coaxial cable", or the "cable television connection".

    What's particularly stupid is the claim that it took a "power tool" to cut this line. Cutting standard 75 ohm cable TV cables takes all the power of ... a knife. At worst, a pair of dikes. Now, maybe this guy was special and the cable company used hardline into his house, but even then a simple bolt cutter would make quick work of it.

    Let's see if we can summarize this tempest over this awful event. A politician organized and led a chapter of the KKK. He sent a letter to senator saying:

    I shall never fight in the armed forces with a negro by my side ... Rather I should die a thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds.

    He was interviewed in 2001 and said:

    There are white niggers. I've seen a lot of white niggers in my time, if you want to use that word.

    His bigotry extended to gay rights, where he:

    ... strongly opposed Clinton's 1993 efforts to allow gays to serve in the military and supported efforts to limit gay marriage. In 1996, before the passage of the Defense of Marriage Act, he said, "The drive for same-sex marriage is, in effect, an effort to make a sneak attack on society by encoding this aberrant behavior in legal form before society itself has decided it should be legal. [...] Let us defend the oldest institution, the institution of marriage between male and female as set forth in the Holy Bible."

    This Scalise guy is clearly ... oh, wait. He didn't do any of that. That's all stuff that the highly respected Senator Robert Byrd did.

    So what did Scalise do that shows he has "KKK ties"? He was invited to and spoke at a conference that he didn't know was organized by someone involved with the KKK. He talked about economics. Afterwards, the KKK organizers blogged about all the useful information about slush funds he gave them, as if his intent was to teach the KKK about how to use slush funds for evil things.

    Scalise no more has KKK ties than Barack Obama has KKK ties because Obama spoke at Byrd's funeral and said good things about him.

  13. When your hash table only has two buckets... by tlambert · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why do you equate gun-rights advocates with KKK members?

    When your hash table only has two buckets, you either hash into bucket 'A' or you hash into bucket 'B'.