Slashdot Mirror


Dish Network Violated Do-Not-Call 57 Million Times

lightbox32 writes Dish Network has been found guilty of violating the Do Not Call list on 57 million separate occasions. They were also found liable for abandoning or causing telemarketers to abandon nearly 50 million outbound telephone calls, in violation of the abandoned-call provision of the Federal Trade Commission's Telemarketing Sales Rule. Penalties for infringing on the Do Not Call list can be up to a whopping $16,000 for each outbound call.

247 comments

  1. .912 Trillion dollars. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Deesh you have been a very bad monkey.

    1. Re:.912 Trillion dollars. by davester666 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actual penalty: $57.00

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    2. Re:.912 Trillion dollars. by GroeFaZ · · Score: 1

      Do you want a James Bond-style supervillain? Because that's how you create James Bond-style supervillains.

      --
      The grass is always greener on the other side of the light cone.
    3. Re:.912 Trillion dollars. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's actually 912 billion. Which is about 1 trillion.

    4. Re:.912 Trillion dollars. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real problem is that telemarketing, political calls and charitable organizations calling folks is legal. Make it all illegal, wit large enough fine to put the companies involved out of business...Thats the only solution.

  2. In related news by stox · · Score: 4, Funny

    US deficit problem SOLVED!

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
    1. Re:In related news by AK+Marc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And we only need another 20 to do it to solve the debt problem.

    2. Re:In related news by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Funny

      And we only need another 20 to do it to solve the debt problem.

      "Rachel at cardholder services" owes me a few billion.

    3. Re:In related news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... US deficit ...

      Your optimism forgets, the bigger the wrong-doing, the greater the discount provided by the court. Then there's culpability, which is lessened because contractors committed this crime, not Dish network employees. At the end, the most likely fine will be about $1 per violation.

      Courts don't punish corporations because that only hurts the shareholders (other corporations).

      Courts don't punish women because that only hurts the children, which may also be female.

    4. Re:In related news by slashmydots · · Score: 1

      Which do you think is more likely? Worldwide currency collapse due to gloabal warming-induced food shortages in which case we owe China zero

      Or

      We actually pay back 20 trillion.

      So who's the genius now? The one who borrowed money and spent it with no intention to pay it back! Stupid Chinese fell for it.

    5. Re:In related news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Of course, the largest single holder of US debt is the US social security trust fund, which owns something like 4x what the Chinese hold. If the US ever does default, social security checks will start bouncing.

    6. Re:In related news by BuckaBooBob · · Score: 2

      Seriously... Fine them and put the company into receivership... to collect... Corps need to learn they are not above the law. Bankrupt a few large companies and they should be less brazen about not giving a crap about anything but how to make money regardless of what they are allowed to do.

      --
      Who needs WiFi when we can have Packet Over Sheep! http://datacomm.org/PoS-InternetDraft.txt
    7. Re:In related news by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Printing money isn't defaulting.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    8. Re:In related news by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      If the US ever does default, social security checks will start bouncing.

      Printing money isn't defaulting.

      "If A, then B"
      "but C isn't B"

      Thanks for your comment, but I see no relation between it and any comment that came before. "They'll never 'default', they'll just print money to cover the debt" would have been on-topic.

      The funny thing is, that the way they've set up how money enters the economy, they'll actually not be able to make it work very well to pay of money with printed money.

      Print money. They essentially give it away for free to banks (with the assumption that the banks will use it to buy government bonds). but when the bonds are worthless because of the hyper-inflation caused by the hundreds of trillions of dollars printed to cover the debt, there will be better ways to spend the money.

      The trillion dollar coin trick will work to avoid budget caps, but won't work to actually pay down debt. And if it did work, the economy would collapse anyway. The mechanisms they put in place to stabilize the economy prevent printing money to directly cover debt.

    9. Re:In related news by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      What do you think having the fed backstop the bond auctions amounts to? No federal bond is ever going to be allowed to remain un-purchased.

      If your central bank is always going to buy any bonds the government issues, how is that not pretty god dam directly printing money?

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    10. Re:In related news by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      You are wandering off topic again. Would the worse damage to the economy come from defaulting on bonds, or printing to pay them off? In my opinion, the damage would be the same (presuming you use the tactic to wipe the debt, not just to extend it or pay off a small portion of it), and defaulting is simpler. So the discussion of printing to pay off the debt (all of it, not the "inflate it down" tactics that have/are being used) is pointless. It's the worst way to accomplish the task.

      Just default on any and all debt. At least then, much of the damage will be international, while printing to eliminate the debt will do 100% direct damage only domestically (with follow-on effects that will affect the world, but not directly). So many bonds are held internationally, that the damage will be more spread around the world to simply default.

      Though in either case, it would be less damaging to swithc currencies at the same time. Adopt the Euro when eliminating debt, so you don't have any concerns about lack of "faith" in your currency.

    11. Re:In related news by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Change currencies might be inevitable. But the Euro is in even worse shape.

      They have a dozen governments printing that stuff.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    12. Re:In related news by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      It's the only other currency large enough to work at the moment. And I didn't think there were multiple printers of it, but a single issuing authority. Wasn't that the whole deal with Greece? They wanted to inflate their way out of debt, but Germany didn't want inflation, and there's a single act for it. Just add the US to the EU zone. Other than the militia members that would see it as a cause for open revolt.

    13. Re:In related news by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      No. They are expected to print no more than 4% of their GDP every year. But they all cheat. Every national bank of a Euro nation has the authority to print Euros.

      I frankly expect the Euro to implode first. Greece is working on it today.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    14. Re:In related news by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Then, if the US abandons the dollar, what would be the options? GBP is too small now. With the Euro, it's less accepted in Europe. I think one of the reasons the EU pushed for a unified currency is to get away from the pound. Many places in France, Belgium, the Netherlands and elsewhere took the pound alongside the local currency, making the GBP the default currency of travel.

      The AUD, SGD, and others in Asia-Pac are too small to handle the demand of the US, though Aus would do whatever the US asked. The Yen is in no better shape and the RMB/Yuan is closest, but the US couldn't ever pull that off politically. So if the US abandoned the USD after a collapse, what would the US use? Canadian dollars? Peso?

    15. Re:In related news by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Don't know. I expect the first one to implode to take out any other really weak players, but after that capital flight will help the survivors.

      The British Pound is in particularly bad shape. They have been working on fixing their balance sheet for a good decade and report good results. Unfortunately it's all bullshit and accounting tricks. For example: Taking all pensions off-book doesn't help anything.

      No better then pretending the SS trust fund is an asset that can be tapped.

      In the end it will be who's story becomes laughable first. Lots of capital is looking for safe places to park. Look at the price of productive farmland. That has nothing to do with the price of crops. It's big money buying up land, then renting it to farmers at a short term loss.

      Living anywhere, assume some other currency goes first:

      Will your currency be taken down by bad overseas debt? Will the appropriate government just declare the losers too big to fail and supply liquidity for 'long enough'?

      Will your currency be taken down by lack of domestic confidence? In this case living in a nation of deluded, ego driven 'patriots' will actually be an asset.

      I see the best case as inflation, worst case is asset stripping for nations foolish enough to carry debt in a foreign currency. As always it will be 'good to have H-bombs.'

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    16. Re:In related news by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      No better then pretending the SS trust fund is an asset that can be tapped.

      I've never seen that. I've just seen that the SS fund buys bonds from the general fund. So it's not "real" money, but is a "real" debt.

      In the end it will be who's story becomes laughable first. Lots of capital is looking for safe places to park. Look at the price of productive farmland. That has nothing to do with the price of crops. It's big money buying up land, then renting it to farmers at a short term loss.

      I saw that. I laughed. And sold my farmland (only about 100 acres). But the truth is that land always goes up. There are more people and no more land (except for tiny areas reclaimed, or developments "under water" such as Holland and New Orelans.

      I have land, but rather than owning a farm rented out for 3% return, I own houses rented out for 10-15% return. When the crash happens, people will still need a place to live. I know the standard answers about people just stealing land, but in most cases, a written deed is honored by new governments, even if the interim anarchy doesn't care.

    17. Re:In related news by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Pretending that a huge block of bonds are an asset is standard answer from the 'SS is healthy liars brigade.'

      IIRC Productive midwest farmland bounced between 1k$/acre and 2K$ for decades. Last I looked it was $4K. Farmland isn't the same as residential land. Farmland is valued at present value of future earnings, just like any other productive asset. Future earnings is always a guess. Current investors have inflation expectations.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    18. Re:In related news by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Pretending that a huge block of bonds are an asset is standard answer from the 'SS is healthy liars brigade.'

      So all the retirement accounts that count bonds as assets should instead wipe them off the books, showing a massive loss?

      Like most companies (see Ireland) you can keep books that have debts and assets from other companies under the same ownership.

      The US government doesn't have an asset if it buys its own bonds. But the SS fund most certainly does. The problem is the people who fail basic accounting, asserting their misunderstanding is reality, when reality disagrees.

    19. Re:In related news by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      If you can't cash something in without crashing it's value it's not a good asset. Regardless of left pocket/right pocket issues. It's about maintaining diversified holdings for risk management.

      If an insurance company tried to fund one of their annuity's reserves with company bonds they would slap the cuffs on them. Same should happen to everybody involved with SS.

      Anybody with money in US bonds should be aware there is no functioning market for those bonds. The fed buys all excess at low interest rates. There is no market clearing price or interest for US debt. The market is rigged at best, a completely broken charade at worst. No prudent fund manager keeps more in US bonds then the US government requires.

      Ponzi scheme is an accurate assessment.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    20. Re:In related news by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      If you can't cash something in without crashing it's value it's not a good asset.

      Same as having all your 401(k) invested in the company you work for. If it goes under, you have no job and no retirement. But not a "good" asset doesn't make it not an asset.

      If an insurance company tried to fund one of their annuity's reserves with company bonds they would slap the cuffs on them. Same should happen to everybody involved with SS.

      That would only be the President and Congress. Those are the people that made it what it is. The actual SSA has no power to control where their "surplus" goes. I imagine they'd invest it in the DOW, if they had a free choice.

      An insurance company does fund funds with its own funds. It's only cuffable when you under-fund in the first place, and try to fraudulently cover it with fake assets. That's not the case here.

      Next you'll tell me you think the Subprime Crisis had anything to do with subprime borrowers, when it was 100% fraud by the banks, unrelated to the borrowers they lent to.

    21. Re:In related news by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Do you know what mark to market means? How do you do that with a bond that has no functional market?

      People that take loans they know they cannot pay are without blame when they cannot pay their loans?

      No insurance company can keep reserves in it's own bonds, even if they had the 3 or 4 A rating required they would not legally be able to self deal. Requirements are for levels of funding and quality of investment. The government forces them to hold some government bonds! I worked for the bastards for few years early in may carrier.

      Insurance boards have been dealing with swindlers for many decades and know all the tricks. Even the dirtiest and most permissive know they are dealing with many a dirt-bag, flyby night business. That applies especially to the big names with advertising budgets.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    22. Re:In related news by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Do you know what mark to market means? How do you do that with a bond that has no functional market?

      If there is no market, then the value is zero. Which bonds do you assert have no value?

      People that take loans they know they cannot pay are without blame when they cannot pay their loans?

      I never said that. I'm saying that when the "high risk" group has a low level of defaults (well under historical averages), that it's not that group's fault when the frauds of the rich white male bankers are revealed.

      But in the US, poor are only poor because they are lazy, so if you blame the poor, you are "safe" as they are all worthless sub-human creatures that deserve no sympathy. So they are truly the last group that's safe to discriminate against, regardless of what the oppressed rich white males assert.

    23. Re:In related news by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      I assert there is no functioning market in US treasuries. The Federal reserve is buying up any excess bonds the real market won't buy. The 'real market' is distorted beyond reason by this action, the only remaining players are fools and those required by federal law to hold reserves in federal bonds (mostly insurance reserves which must keep a %).

      These bonds are way overvalued. Their value is not zero, but without a functional market who knows. The secondary market can't fix it as every player knows that they will get flooded with new issue every six weeks. It would be interesting to see who the really big buyers on the secondary market are. Chumps or 'in on it' and getting fresh currency in their left pocket.

      Think about what would happen if a treasury bond auction was dead and there where no bidders. That can not be allowed to happen. The federal reserve will see to that. Fresh printed money buying fresh printed bonds is the market floor. Interest rates won't be allowed to climb until people start laughing.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  3. Some had fun with one of there calls by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 5, Funny
    1. Re:Some had fun with one of there calls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was good.

  4. Suitable Penalties Need To Be Given by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This will continue until the principals in the companies are either sent to jail, castrated, or both. Fines don't seem to work, in the rare cases where any are imposed.

    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    1. Re:Suitable Penalties Need To Be Given by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you? Some kind of Comcast lover!

    2. Re:Suitable Penalties Need To Be Given by lgw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The principals are disposable, interchangeable, replaceable. Fines big enough to cause a shareholder revolt will have a lasting effect, on more than just this company (as the large shareholders of Dish are likely large shareholders of many other companies). Fine em a significant percentage of the market cap of the corporation, and that will leave a mark.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    3. Re:Suitable Penalties Need To Be Given by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Fines don't seem to work, in the rare cases where any are imposed.

      Fines don't work for companies when the amount is reduced to the point it becomes more profitable to do the illegal activity and pay the fine. Especially if they have, say, 10 things on the side, and get caught with only one.

      Just think about traffic tickets. No one wants to be caught speeding or going over a stop sign. But lot of people do so anyway. There are various reasons: 1. the laws are unreasonable (speed limit of 55 in roads that can take 75, for instance, or a stop sign at every turn in a parking lot), 2. everyone else does it (leading back to number 1 as the primary cause), and 3. You think you can get away with it.

      If I speed or something else, I get a several hundred fine at least PER INFRACTION. Companies, though, routinely get some type of wholesale deal, with each infraction being pennies on the dollar. That has to stop. The government needs to figure out what each phone call brings in on the average, multiply by 3-10* as an infraction, and then multiply by 3 again for the shit they aren't catching. So 9-30x total. That will get the attention of this company and any others. Finance the FCC or whoever polices this with the fund more, rinse and repeat.

      If the fine per call was $25 for each call, you can bet your ass the resulting billion dollar fine will get companies attention. And make it the law, that if the telemarketing company cannot be found, the ones who contracted them are on the hook.

      *I varied here, because it really depends on if it's a human or robocaller. If it's a robot calling humans, the fine should be higher because the company costs to do so are lower even if the profit margin is shit (but the human annoyance factor is still sky high).

    4. Re:Suitable Penalties Need To Be Given by nedlohs · · Score: 4, Informative

      Dish's market cap is $34 billion. If they fine them $16,000 for of the 57 million calls then Dish certainly won't be making anymore...

    5. Re:Suitable Penalties Need To Be Given by 31415926535897 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The principals are disposable, interchangeable, replaceable.

      Just curious, if this is true, why are they paid 100x more than anyone else in the company?

    6. Re:Suitable Penalties Need To Be Given by Rennt · · Score: 2

      Who do you think approves the pay cheques?

    7. Re:Suitable Penalties Need To Be Given by lucm · · Score: 2

      Nah. If you look at the numbers, the p/e ratio of this stock is more than 2x the p/e ratio of Apple. It would take an insanely huge fine to scare away investors, especially those institutional investors who own 95% of the company. This is not a corporation that will bend over for legislators, especially pencil-pushers like the FTC.

      Also it makes no sense to adapt a fine to the market cap of a corporation. As an example, Google has 10x the market cap of Dish, but only 4x their annual revenue. Dish also has a profit that is 4x bigger than Amazon, with a market cap 5x lower. The market cap is meaningless.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    8. Re:Suitable Penalties Need To Be Given by sjames · · Score: 3

      They knew the law and they knew how many calls they were making...

      Still, I don't want to see all those people out of work, so perhaps they should be forcibly converted to a non-profit until they work off the fines.

    9. Re:Suitable Penalties Need To Be Given by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The principals are disposable, interchangeable, replaceable.

      Just curious, if this is true, why are they paid 100x more than anyone else in the company?

      It takes a lot of money to convince people to do something so atrocious... but there's always a line of people willing to try.

    10. Re:Suitable Penalties Need To Be Given by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      because the boards are stupid and full of rich people and the only paylevels they see are the executives so they have nothing to compare to and they just shrug and think that's what they need to pay and that they wouldn't get anyone competent at 1/10th of the price(still 10x more than usual well paid employee in the company).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    11. Re:Suitable Penalties Need To Be Given by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      I think the 2008 crash demonstrated that there are more than a few psychopaths running major corporations. Maybe we should be thankful they're only screwing investors and customers out of billions, otherwise they would have underground lairs filled with kidnapped plus size women putting the lotion in the basket.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    12. Re: Suitable Penalties Need To Be Given by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I favor the solution in the Venture Brothers episode, the Lepidopterists.

      Let those supervillains arch people who can handle it and leave the rest of us alone.

    13. Re:Suitable Penalties Need To Be Given by Moof123 · · Score: 1

      Execs should be held liable personally. Shareholders end up taking it in the shorts thanks to the excess legal shielding that incorporation provides, which lets wreckless management sink good companies while the guilty escape with golden parachutes. Oh well.

    14. Re:Suitable Penalties Need To Be Given by Moof123 · · Score: 1

      Use tithing as a reference. Set the penalty upper limit at about 10% of yearly revenue pretax, and pre double irish. Cancel all outstanding executives bonuses at the C level up to and including today as well.

    15. Re:Suitable Penalties Need To Be Given by mysidia · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They knew the law and they knew how many calls they were making...

      They should fine them $1000 per call * 57 million calls = $57 billion.

      Prohibited from releasing any employees or managers, altering policies, disposing of any property, or stopping any ongoing business operations in order to pay any portion of the fine. Any amount that cannot be paid in cash within 5 business days, to be settled by constructing a trust and transferring all remaining equity in the company to the trust, with the government assigned secure debt convertible in part or in whole to common shares on demand at any point in time, having value equilvalent to the greater of the number of shares valued at the deficit amount today and the number of shares valued at the deficit amount on the day of conversion.

    16. Re:Suitable Penalties Need To Be Given by lgw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just curious, if this is true, why are they paid 100x more than anyone else in the company?

      They aren't. There's a normal "power curve" distribution of salaries. You have to understand that CEOs (and to a lesser other extent senior execs of larger companies) are professional entertainers, just like movie actors and professional athletes, and you'll find the same salary distribution in each of the three groups. Sure, they entertain investors and analysts instead of the hoi polloi but even so.

      Sometimes the CEO is a founder, of course, and then his real compensation is as a major shareholder, and any salary is just number games, but when it's not there's a bidding war for those seen as the best. If you can make a company of 100,000 people just 1% more productive than the next guy, how much is it worth to the stockholders to get you instead of the next guy? Of course, it's often illusion, but that's just a risk factor in that calculation.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    17. Re:Suitable Penalties Need To Be Given by lgw · · Score: 4, Interesting

      would take an insanely huge fine to scare away investors

      Isn't that what I was suggesting. A fine of say $3 billion structured over 10 years wouldn't put them out of business, but it would be an ongoing 30% hit to earnings. Even if you think they were going to double or triple before, that will significantly hamper growth just coping with the need to come up with the outgoing cashflow. You'd likely see a longterm 20-30% hit to the stock price. Pension and mutual funds don't just shrug that sort of thing off -- their analysts and decision makers have to look smart quarter-by-quarter -- and will do something about gross executive incompetence of that sort.

      I've worked at 2 different companies where the CEO was fired, along with most of the top execs. In one case, most of the board was fired too. CEOs live in fear of that sort of thing - they give 0 shits about what you or I think, but they know who their actual bosses are.
       

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    18. Re:Suitable Penalties Need To Be Given by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      wreckless management

      I prefer it to the alternative.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    19. Re: Suitable Penalties Need To Be Given by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Under US tax law, EOs must be the highest paid employees of the company. They must be paid a lot, or they will be audited and fined.

    20. Re:Suitable Penalties Need To Be Given by weilawei · · Score: 2

      What about the employees breaking the law? Are they permitted to release them? Alter their policy of violating the law?

      Nitpicking aside, I wholly agree. Although, the idea of forcing them to continue telemarketing and then siphoning them dry does seem somewhat appealing...

    21. Re:Suitable Penalties Need To Be Given by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just curious, if this is true, why are they paid 100x more than anyone else in the company?

      Because if you price a product too low, people think it's not worth anything.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    22. Re:Suitable Penalties Need To Be Given by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      What about the employees breaking the law? Are they permitted to release them? Alter their policy of violating the law?

      Only after a conviction. If they want to release those people, they'll have to throw them fully to the wolves.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    23. Re:Suitable Penalties Need To Be Given by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the real world as opposed to your alternate universe, Dish will simply promise not to do this in the future. If pressed they will appoint a monitor to verfiy compliance likely a prominent politician's unemployable relative.

    24. Re:Suitable Penalties Need To Be Given by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've always thought that a good way to enforce these sorts of things would be to make the acting CEO at the time the infraction occurred should have to hand write an apology letter to each person wronged. Quitting the company wouldn't free you from the obligation, leaving it to the next guy, it would follow you until you'd completed it. I bet the thought of having to hand write 100 million apologies would really make any company take a second thought about doing things like this. And the best part, nobody can complain about the cost of the fine hurting the share holders.

    25. Re:Suitable Penalties Need To Be Given by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, because then they will reroute their funds to lobby and get anyone who stood in their way fired, humiliated, thrown into prison, or assassinated.

    26. Re:Suitable Penalties Need To Be Given by Cardoor · · Score: 2

      hogwash. sounds like the result of reading too many economics textbooks at the expense of living in the real world. stacked boards of directors and obscene pay packages for failure are more illustrative. just today, you can read about target:

      http://www.zerohedge.com/news/...

    27. Re:Suitable Penalties Need To Be Given by lgw · · Score: 1

      You do realize that a zerohedge link is about as credible as a timecube link, and less entertaining, right? The timecube guy likely gives better investment advice, as well.

      Again, the usual cases are either there is overlap between large shareholders and company officers (almost always founders), which can get a bit dirty but is mostly just a numbers game, or there's a bidding war for the guy perceived as the best for the job (how much difference in skill there really is between these guys is an unrelated matter).

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    28. Re:Suitable Penalties Need To Be Given by Cardoor · · Score: 1

      you do realize that ad hominem attacks on a website link are illustrative of a tiny and only partially functional mind?

      aaah... ad hominem.. the last bastion of emotional and intellectual cowards.

      if you actually read the article, you would see it did nothing but give facts. good luck arguing with those.

    29. Re:Suitable Penalties Need To Be Given by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We won't do this, look up the infamous (to me, anyway) Holder Memo. Eric Holder took down a company and cost people jobs, he was in the right, but the damage (I think it was Anderson) was so great, we don't do it anymore.

      No matter how evil the company, there's people's job on the line. Stupid, I know.

    30. Re:Suitable Penalties Need To Be Given by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

      The principals are disposable, interchangeable, replaceable..

      And if their predecessors were sent to jail, castrated, or both, how eager would they be to get the same punishment.

      We've been fining companies the whole time and it doesn't work, they just calculate possible fines into their bottom line, it's just another line item.

      If corporations are people, and enjoy the same protections, then they should have the same punishments as well.

    31. Re:Suitable Penalties Need To Be Given by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

      you do realize that ad hominem attacks on a website link are illustrative of a tiny and only partially functional mind?

        aaah... ad hominem.. the last bastion of emotional and intellectual cowards.

      if you actually read the article, you would see it did nothing but give facts. good luck arguing with those.

      there were no "facts", it's a one line article and a graph attributed to nothing, fuck you asshole (there's a more appropriate ad hominem for you) for trying to drive up page views of your shitty site.

    32. Re:Suitable Penalties Need To Be Given by Ian+A.+Shill · · Score: 1
      So, I think we can all agree, there would be good and bad.

      I think the 2008 crash demonstrated that there are more than a few psychopaths running major corporations. Maybe we should be thankful they're only screwing investors and customers out of billions, otherwise they would have underground lairs filled with kidnapped plus size women putting the lotion in the basket.

      --
      For hire.
    33. Re:Suitable Penalties Need To Be Given by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you do realize that ad hominem attacks on a website link are illustrative of a tiny and only partially functional mind?

        aaah... ad hominem.. the last bastion of emotional and intellectual cowards.

      1. Your reply is ad hominem.
      2. Ad hominem is appropriate when the claim is relying on reputation or using reputation to give weight to the claim.
      3. I don't see much in the way of Facts there. I see claims which the reader is expected to assume are valid based on the reputation of the site (see point #2), but I don't see anything to give those claims credibility.

    34. Re:Suitable Penalties Need To Be Given by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      World Net Daily could give facts as well; it doesn't make them credible. They lost their credibility long ago, and one article won't get it back. Frankly, no one trusts them.

      Same deal here. Zero Hedge has no credibility; therefore, they could post a peer-reviewed paper and it would still be suspect. After all, this is the site that correctly predicted 15 of the last 2 recessions.

      Pointing this out is not an ad hominem.

    35. Re:Suitable Penalties Need To Be Given by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also worth pointing out that you answered an alleged ad hominem with... an ad hominem. Funny, that.

    36. Re:Suitable Penalties Need To Be Given by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PE ratio can be scammed when a corp buys back it's own shares...

    37. Re:Suitable Penalties Need To Be Given by Cardoor · · Score: 1

      i agree that they had the gall to hide the 'facts' it by only making them apparent enough that a blindfolded fetus could see it. it's easy to understand why you could miss it since you are clearly hunched over with your head probing somewhere around your small intestine. (though i have a sneaking suspicion its lingering somewhere around the taint)

      ZH doesn't need any more clicks than it gets. certainly not from me. perhaps you want to just go to the very article they referenced IN THE BEGINNING OF THE ARTICLE.
      http://www.cbc.ca/news/busines...

      god. some people are so intent on believing bullshit they will fight to the death to keep from seeing the truth.

    38. Re:Suitable Penalties Need To Be Given by lgw · · Score: 1

      Weekly World News had "facts" and photographs too! Some sources are so far from credibility that they actually hurt the credibility of your argument. Zerohedge is one of them.

      If it's true, you can find an article about it somewhere credible. If you can't find an article somewhere credible, if it's only on zerohedge, then it's not true.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    39. Re:Suitable Penalties Need To Be Given by Cardoor · · Score: 1

      spoken like a true naive. or gov-troll. maybe both.

    40. Re:Suitable Penalties Need To Be Given by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      could be worse, could have been a goatse link

    41. Re:Suitable Penalties Need To Be Given by mysidia · · Score: 1

      What about the employees breaking the law? Are they permitted to release them? Alter their policy of violating the law?

      The new owners will of course appoint a new management, who will have authority to make the changes desired; the old management as a whole retained for a time in advisory capacity only, of course some managers not supervising the sales/marketing/telemarkting departments might be kept for the new management.

      Those managers related to the abuse, stripped of all authority and credentials, transferred to a partner company (The McDonalds across the street) and forced to remain on and work full time in the lowest-level job available for 15 years, in order to avoid criminal prosecution.

  5. Do not Comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Violation!

  6. = $912,000,000,000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Assuming maximum penalty for all calls.

    "Do you take card?"

    1. Re:= $912,000,000,000 by hermitdev · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Market Cap of Dish Network is roughly $34B, so the max potential fine is roughly 30x what the company is worth. If levied, it means *poof*, gone. Won't happen. There will be a fine, but I'll be surprised if it ends up being more than even $30M.

    2. Re:= $912,000,000,000 by pete6677 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yep. Dish is surely "too big to fail". Large corporations simply cannot be effectively punished. They fund enough political campaigns that legislators will have a definite interest in making sure no truly harmful penalty is ever inflicted on a big company.

    3. Re:= $912,000,000,000 by hermitdev · · Score: 0

      There's another part that I didn't bring up: Dish will be fined. But, where does that money go? To the people impacted by their acts? No. It will disappear into the fed government somewhere. Whatever fines are collected should be distributed to the people that they violated - and I'm not one of them.

    4. Re:= $912,000,000,000 by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 0

      Whatever fines are collected should be distributed to the lawyers representing the people that they violated - and I'm not one of them.

      FTFY

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    5. Re:= $912,000,000,000 by crbowman · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Bull. Levy a fine larger than the market cap of the company (or even greater than the assets.) When they can't pay the company as a whole can go into bankruptcy and the government can be awarded the company as a whole functioning intact corporation (if they don't get it all they can get enough to control it). There is no reason the company needs to be broken up, it's a working functioning corporation. As the now largest owner the government can fire several high level employee including the CEO, dissolve the board and sell all shares to the public. Low level employees with no connection to the crime can continue to work. A functioning profit making concern continues to exist and the shareholders and bond holders get zero'd out, thus providing them with incentive not to be so passive and allow a corporation to do shit like this again next time. The government gets money in the end. It's a win-win-win!

    6. Re:= $912,000,000,000 by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      That sounds so nice, doesn't it...

      The law of unintended consequences would kick in... because the minute the government goes around taking companies, everyone else sees this...

      Then the government discovered what a great money maker this is, and goes after all companies for anything they might be doing wrong...

      It is a bad path to go down... and the people hurt are the employees and customers, not the big fish...

      ---

      What you are suggesting has actually been done, in other countries... it isn't pretty...

    7. Re:= $912,000,000,000 by Spamalope · · Score: 2, Informative

      The law of unintended consequences would kick in... because the minute the government goes around taking companies, everyone else sees this...

      Then the government discovered what a great money maker this is, and goes after all companies for anything they might be doing wrong...

      ---

      What you are suggesting has actually been done, in other countries... it isn't pretty...

      Countries like the US with asset forfeiture laws creating a special interest group and cottage industry around the legal fiction that your assets are a person and you have no legal standing if they're 'incarcerated'. My introduction was while I was renewing my sales tax license. I overheard a conversation next to me. The person had been pulled over and arrested on invented drug charges which were thrown out in court because they were baseless (it sounded like friends pooled money for a defense lawyer). In the meantime the State had seized and sold his car, and taken his life savings from his bank accounts. The clerk was explaining to him that 'It's our policy to retain those funds after trial'.

      So the state got paid, and the lawyers got paid - and now we know why he was pulled over for 'waste of time' charges...

      Apparently just taking everything is only a good idea if you're too small to make large political contributions.

    8. Re:= $912,000,000,000 by aviators99 · · Score: 1

      There will be a fine, but I'll be surprised if it ends up being more than even $30M.

      I think you're right. But basically what that means is that they will only be penalized for 1,875 of 57,000,000 calls. Sends a clear message: please violate this law -- you won't be penalized for 3/1000th of one percent of them.

    9. Re:= $912,000,000,000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So let me get this straight...

      A fine is levied because Party A caused damages to Party B. Party A cannot pay the fine, so the government takes over Party A.

      I fail to see how this benefits anyone other than the government.

      All of the innocent people at Party A that weren't involved at punished, Party B gets nothing for damages caused, and Gub'mint gets "free" assets to spend on, well, whatever.

      Then you have people in this country going, "holy shit dude, the government is taking over companies because of fines - and fines from regulations don't even have to be voted on, they're just decided upon by some guy at the FCC," and you will see businesses running faster than light to get the fuck out of the country.

      This is the stupidest idea I have seen on Slashdot in a long time from the "government is the answer to all things" folks.

      Damn man. Just... God damn.

    10. Re:= $912,000,000,000 by afidel · · Score: 1

      Whatever fines are collected should be distributed to the people
      They are, in a much more efficient way that cutting everyone a check, by lowering the amount of taxes which must be collected or the debt that must be incurred by the federal government.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    11. Re:= $912,000,000,000 by Salgat · · Score: 1

      You don't want to destroy companies, disrupt millions who use their services or are employed there, all because of a single fine. The reasonable course of action is to fine a reasonably large amount that will deter them from future occurrences, as the law intended.

  7. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this mean they will be gutting the company, "selling" the assets and beginning anew as several smaller firms that will later merge into one?

  8. I'll pass on the money...if I get what I do want. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Which is the ability to inflict pain on the telemarketing fraudsters.

    Seriously, is it too much to ask for a license to kill? I promise to use it responsibly!

  9. So we book the revenue. 800 billion dollars! by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    Book it as revenue. Declare the budget balanced. Sell the stock when the news hits the markets. Sell the company and skip town. Wait... it is US Govt right? It has already been sold to the highest bidder, right! Dang it, I knew I would hit a snag somewhere.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  10. Re:I'll pass on the money...if I get what I do wan by pubwvj · · Score: 2

    Don't make promises you can't keep. Even if you have no intention of keeping them.

  11. They are sending me junk mail for ages. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    I have discontinued their service ages ago, but without fail they keep pelting me with junk mail. Is this company selling international TV streams via dishworld.com?

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:They are sending me junk mail for ages. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's any consolation, Comcast still pelt me we their junk mail eight years after I cut the cord. Same goes for AT&T.

  12. Not Surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At one point, starting in 2011 (and possibly still), DISH had an entire team of about 30 call center agents in their Littleton call center dedicated to astroturfing - hyping DISH products and services, sometimes disclosing their employment, sometimes not... and each agent was required to make at least 22 posts a day.

  13. $912 billion fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice knowing you, Dish.

  14. Joe_Dragon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    you're grammar are atrocious !

  15. Easy fix. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    As penalty, since per instance, the fine would be just shy of $1 Trillion, they forfeit all of their spectrum rights.

    It's futile to have the fines, and rules, if they aren't enforced

    1. Re:Easy fix. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's futile to have the fines, and rules, if they aren't enforced"

      resistance is futile you will be assimilated. borg don't bow to corporate laws either...

  16. My last call from Dish Network by TheRealHocusLocus · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Are you recording this, or can you set a flag that will cause this call to be flagged for review? Do it now."

    "You're calling because I have a listed phone at an address that used to have Dish Network. Yes, there is a Dish dish on the roof; two of them in fact. Despite asking you not to call, you keep calling on average every two weeks. Clearly you hope that those dishes will be turned on again right now. There is no chance of that, but if you call again here's what will happen. I will climb onto the roof and unbolt both dishes, then toss them over the edge onto the driveway. Then I will bust them apart with a sledgehammer and set fire to what parts can burn. Then I will put out the fire by pissing on it. I will save a souvenir, something with the Dish logo on it, and plant it on a pike in my front yard as a warning to Dish sales representatives. Or if you stop calling it the dishes can stay up there and wait for the next tenant. For the last time, please don't call again. Got it?"

    I got a laugh from the lady representative and she said 'Got it!"
    They didn't call again.

    --
    <blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>
    1. Re:My last call from Dish Network by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      Don't leave us hanging! Did they call you again? Did you actually do this?

    2. Re:My last call from Dish Network by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm surprised they didn't put you on a special 'call this guy - he's kinda fun' list.

      I would have....

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:My last call from Dish Network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So free Dish advertising to people passing by and the next home owner has to buy a new dish. Sounds like a win-win for Dish Network.

    4. Re:My last call from Dish Network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /r/ThatHappened

    5. Re:My last call from Dish Network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They very last line answers your question.

    6. Re:My last call from Dish Network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First you expect us to read an article, now you expect us to read comments??

    7. Re:My last call from Dish Network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    8. Re:My last call from Dish Network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you do that? I'd be the one having fun, while you're the one wasting your company's time.

    9. Re:My last call from Dish Network by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a rental so maybe the landlord wanted them to stay up there. But if it was my place taking down any satellite dishes would be one of the first things I did.

  17. Thats odd by Dereck1701 · · Score: 1

    I've received all kinds of mail from them and DirectTV, but I've never got a call from them or Dish Network and I've never heard any complaints of people receiving calls from either. On the other hand I get all kinds of calls from car warranty and home security companies.

  18. Most calls not really from Dish by Brad1138 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Most of the calls are from telemarketing companies that sell Dish, not Dish themselves. I work for an authorized, small local company that sells and installs Dish (and DTV). As we see it, the biggest problem in the industry is telemarketers that sell the systems and then don't care at all about the customer. These unethical companies are the ones breaking the laws, but Dish looks the other way as long as they are sending them lots of business.

    The sad thing is, it is very possible Dish will do away with all retailers to help fix this problem, and the small, ethical, local retailers will get thrown out in the wash... This is the complete livelihood for the 5 of us that own and work at our company. We handle some large accts like our state capital, entire state prison system, state University medical center (to name just a few). My boss has built a great little company, it will be very sad to see it taken away as a result of this. This is actually quite scary, we all have over 15 years of our lives invested in this company.

    --
    If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
    1. Re:Most calls not really from Dish by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Most of the calls are from telemarketing companies that sell Dish, not Dish themselves.

      Who cares? They retained those companies and then didn't do any checking up on them, or they did and they let it continue. Either way, they're responsible.

      The sad thing is, it is very possible Dish will do away with all retailers to help fix this problem, and the small, ethical, local retailers will get thrown out in the wash...

      Well, to be fair, Dish are massive spammers. What's ethical about the massive volumes of spam that they snail mail out?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Most calls not really from Dish by Brad1138 · · Score: 1

      We don't telemarket or go door to door or anything like that. I didn't say Dish (or the telemarketers) were ethical, I said we (our local, family owned company) are the ethical ones. We care about our customer, we give them a local place to come to or call if they have any problems or questions, we personally roll out to fix problems if needed. Good luck with that if you sign up with a telemarketer.

      --
      If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
    3. Re:Most calls not really from Dish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the calls are from telemarketing companies that sell Dish

      most? probably ALL. besides the larger telemarketing outfits there are also a lot of little shit fly-by-night companies that sell dish for the affiliate revenue and have no problems lying, cheating, breaking laws and dish policies to close the sale.. and not just for dish but directv, siriusxm, dsl and cable companies too.

      i don't think dish themselves do ANY cold calls... and anyone on THEIR list IS or WAS a customer and is fair game for them due to current or past relationship.

    4. Re:Most calls not really from Dish by Mirar · · Score: 1

      If they could blame this on the subcontractors, wouldn't they have done that already?

      Do they have installers themselves already (in competition)? Otherwise I doubt they change anything. (If they survive.)

    5. Re: Most calls not really from Dish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Over 55% of DISHs business is serviced by retailers. They will never get rid of their retailer system, it's too profitable.

    6. Re: Most calls not really from Dish by therealobsideus · · Score: 1

      DiSH has several call centers designated just for sales, both cold calls based on "leads" and for incoming sales calls.

    7. Re:Most calls not really from Dish by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I didn't say Dish (or the telemarketers) were ethical, I said we (our local, family owned company) are the ethical ones

      So you're ethical, although you're working with and ultimately for a company which is not ethical? Just doing your job, I know, I know.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:Most calls not really from Dish by houghi · · Score: 1

      If your boss has only one customer, then he is not really the boss of a company. He is a manager of a subsidary with all the downsides and not many of the upsides.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    9. Re:Most calls not really from Dish by laurencetux · · Score: 1

      nice try but
      as 47cfr64.1200 states (http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=deffa3d151a4231246426d247a25a7a5&node=se47.3.64_11200&rgn=div8)

      "(3) The term established business relationship means a prior or existing relationship formed by a voluntary two-way communication between a person or entity and a residential subscriber with or without an exchange of consideration, on the basis of the subscriber's purchase or transaction with the entity within the eighteen (18) months immediately preceding the date of the telephone call or on the basis of the subscriber's inquiry or application regarding products or services offered by the entity within the three months immediately preceding the date of the call, which relationship has not been previously terminated by either party.
              (i) The subscriber's seller-specific do-not-call request, as set forth in paragraph (d)(3) of this section, terminates an established business relationship for purposes of telemarketing and telephone solicitation even if the subscriber continues to do business with the seller."

      what might help is if folks print the full law out and keep it near where phone calls are received. Lets call it Telemarketer Lotto! For each violation you get 5 points for each minute you get 3 points for each cuss word you get 7 points each time you move up the management ladder you get 6 points and 15 points if they hang up on you

    10. Re:Most calls not really from Dish by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Ok, so to extend your very clever comment, take your place of employment: McDonalds. Basically slave labor... and yet, you continue to work there.

      We're talking about the guys who operate the franchises here. The proper comparison would be to opening a McDonald's franchise. People start up a Dish Network installation franchise either knowing that they are spammers, or not caring to find out. They're part of the problem, not the solution.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:Most calls not really from Dish by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      What's ethical about the massive volumes of spam that they snail mail out?

      They are just trying to do their part to help fund the post office. Why do you hate postal workers?

    12. Re:Most calls not really from Dish by Brad1138 · · Score: 1

      We do not work for Dish or Directv. We are authorized to sell, install and maintain the products. Does a salesman at a local AV store that sells Sony TV's work for Sony?

      We pride ourselves on the fact that we don't telemarket or lie to our customers. My boss is blown away that anyone would (be dumb enough to) give their SS#, CC#, birth-date, address and phone # to someone that just called them on the phone... Unfortunately people do, and then they have a problem and come to our store, because when they called the telemarketers back no one would give them the time of day. We have to inform them that they bought it from our competition and are now asking us to support it and help them with their product (you can see steam come out of my bosses ears when this happens). They think we are all one happy team and we should help them out for free...

      As I said earlier, we have some high profile customers. The University of "my state" medical center (one of the top 5-10 in the country), has our system. To them the fact that it is Dish running the infrastructure is irrelevant. They needed better TV, we bid on the job and won. We build what is essentially an "old school" cable system to run the Hospital, powered by Dish network receivers that are located in a large mechanical room on the roof.

      The residential customer sees one of our billboards, or hears about us by word of mouth and calls us, or comes into the store. We show them what we have and they decide what they want. We can not control what other companies do, but we didn't flood their mail with junk mail or cold call them or knock on their door.

      Your comment that we are "just doing our job" is silly and insulting. Again, if Sony did something very unethical, does that mean everyone who has ever sold Sony should be considered unethical also? Does it mean that the Sony TV's still weren't the best fit for the customers needs?

      --
      If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
    13. Re:Most calls not really from Dish by Brad1138 · · Score: 1

      Well, we have plenty more than one customer. Your assertion is wrong and shows a complete lack of understanding how our business works.

      --
      If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
    14. Re:Most calls not really from Dish by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      If Dish continues to exist, they will continue to need people to install the dishes -- whether they're outside contractors or Dish employees. Either way, you could still continue installing dishes.

      If Dish went out of business (and DirecTV's sales didn't increase to take up the slack) and demand for satellite installations decreased to the point where your company went out of business, well, that's the owner's fault for not diversifying.

      Regardless, concern for your well-being as a a Dish contractor is not a reason to disregard Dish's law-breaking!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    15. Re:Most calls not really from Dish by afidel · · Score: 1

      To be honest he said 15 years of his life which means he may have start before Dish became spammers (not sure how long their scummier business practices have been around since I have a mental filter on snail mail spam that gets immediately recycled and my home phone is given out to noone who doesn't absolutely need it like our local schools or our doctors office).

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  19. Ex-Dish Customer Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I believe it. They have been bad on all 3 fronts: mail, phone, and email. Give them a throw-away email address, use the main line at work (or something). Got a PO Box for billing? Use it! The service doesn't generally need to know where you live although that can complicate installation. Back in the day, I would handpoint my own dish using the signal strength indicator on the TV as a feedback.

    I recall sending annual unsubscribe emails with a cc to canspam@uce.gov (or whatever that address was). Useless. You had to get on the phone and bitch your way to a supervisor's supervisor/manager. That might work for a little while.

    I think the problem only went away because of

    a) cord cutting (internet only instead of dish/cable)
    b) no more land line at my home
    c) abandoned email addresses

    I'm a hardline libertarian, anarcho-capitalist/voluntaryist, but this turned my stomach.

    In its 238-page ruling, the District Court for the Central District of Illinois found that Dish Network called over one million phone numbers that were registered either on Dish Network’s own website as Do Not Calls, or that were marked as “DNC” by telemarketing vendors.

  20. Cardholder services by BenJeremy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Argh. After they say they are calling in regards to my card ending in "...1234" I ask them to identify the bank, at which point they balk.

    Likewise, when scammers call me up about my [insert model year] [insert make] [insert model] and how my warranty is up, I ask them to name my warranty company (I know the exact terms and the company, having dealt with them a few times already), to which they have no answer. The last one got angry and hung up after I lectured her on scamming people.

    As far as I'm concerned, I fully support the use of our Predator Drone program to identify, locate, and destroy these call centers (who are most certainly not calling from anywhere in the US, let alone near the area code spoofed on my caller id)

    1. Re:Cardholder services by AK+Marc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It should be illegal to spoof caller ID. It's fraud. Lying for gain. They know that their real number would get blocked/ignored.

    2. Re:Cardholder services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The worst I have ever heard of was from a friend who received a call from someone with a heavy east Indian accent who claimed they were the IRS and that he owed them money. When my friend questioned the validity of the call, the person got angry and started threatening him, saying he was a federal agent and that he would be sending police over to arrest him. At that point, my friend told him to fuck off and hung up.

    3. Re:Cardholder services by Nkwe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It should be illegal to spoof caller ID. It's fraud.

      Fraud is already illegal. Perhaps we should enforce that.

    4. Re:Cardholder services by sjames · · Score: 2

      My new favorite is "The Attorney General's office" notifying me I am going to be sued for writing a bad check in New York. Naturally, I can make it all go away if I send a payment now.

    5. Re:Cardholder services by MobSwatter · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You have to realize the heart of America was broken when they killed Kennedy. Since then the place has become exactly what he feared it would be. Not the only heart that was broken in the early 60's. I spoke to my great uncle Jack in the early 90's who was OSS when it became the CIA in '47. He explained that "SR was his baby, and that the program was halted not because of funding being cut, it was the way they did it, and that involved your grandfather". The plane my grandfather was on was last on the ground on north shore Lake Tahoe, the same place where the Cal-Neva is and where the Kennedy shooters were said to have met discovered in the investigation within a year later after the Kennedy assassination. My family was pretty much aviation lovers, after all that they ran from it. There is a lot more to the story that I can see since they croaked my father up there 5/1/2013. It was 25 years before any real development in aviation took place, and what I believe that was in the heart of my great uncle Jack is if the mob is enjoying the same rights and protections for all the hard work as the tax payers, then why do it. Kennedy feared a mob run country, he got his worst nightmare. We can pretty much expect anything at this point, but if revolt should happen, spare the brass, the mob is your target, brass are only their puppets.

    6. Re:Cardholder services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It should be illegal to spoof caller ID. It's fraud.

      Fraud is already illegal. Perhaps we should enforce that.

      Sorry, enforcing that got defunded because big government is evil.

    7. Re:Cardholder services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I spoof caller ID with every call. The phone number I give out to people is my Google Voice number, which has been my house number for over a decade before porting it (not directly) to Google Voice a few years ago. When I moved to my current location there was a local porting rule, since overturned, that allowed crossing state and area code lines within a short distance. Years after the move when I changed phone companies I was no longer able to keep my number by porting it to the new company, so I went the Google Voice route. At my new company, and any subsequent company I may switch service to, I spoof my callerID to my long time number so that no one ever has to change and relearn my number.

      Is it your opinion that this should be illegal?

    8. Re:Cardholder services by MobSwatter · · Score: 1

      If posting from another country I can understand the funny attribute, but the fall of the US does have some pretty nasty repercussions for every country it supports aid to. Better be willing to step up or spend some time digging your foot out of your country's mouth.

    9. Re:Cardholder services by Sable+Drakon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Or perhaps we should change caller ID schemes? Instead of showing the number that the headers are spoofing, have CID show the actual billing number. That can't be spoofed as easily as the CID headers are.

      --
      The Amarri pray for god, the Caldari pray for profit. the Gallente pray for peace, but the Minmatar pray their ships hol
    10. Re:Cardholder services by Sable+Drakon · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be surprised if more and more telemarketers were using some form of Skype Out implimentation. Can't trace that back to a user or address without an act of God against Microsoft.

      --
      The Amarri pray for god, the Caldari pray for profit. the Gallente pray for peace, but the Minmatar pray their ships hol
    11. Re: Cardholder services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are not doing it for financial gain. So this is not fraud.

    12. Re:Cardholder services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drive them nuts,

      Just a minute, I'll get my pocket book and call you right back.

      Hang up before they tell you the caller ID is invalid.

    13. Re:Cardholder services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It appears that paranoid schizophrenia runs in your family too. What a bunch of incoherent blabber you posted.

    14. Re:Cardholder services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Open Source Software? Computer Industry Acroniems? Soviet Russia? What /are/ you talking about?

    15. Re:Cardholder services by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      I've taken to answering those calls in my best 'official' voice, and use a line like "Thank you for calling the FBI criminal self incarceration hotline. To schedule your surrender, press 1. por español prensa número dos."

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    16. Re:Cardholder services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on, wouldn't you like to get some sulfur hexafluoride and spoof your caller id to Lucifer at 800-666-0000?

      That stuff is great for getting a demon voice.

    17. Re:Cardholder services by RavenLrD20k · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What constitutes fraud is the reason for the spoofing. You're doing the spoof to make sure that people know who you are and can find you easily by maintaining a level of contact consistency. This is the exact opposite of fraud in that you are spoofing your number to maintain consistency in your identity to others. Fraud is using these techniques to misrepresent and obfuscate yourself to others in the attempt to perform some form of malice.

    18. Re:Cardholder services by LaurenCates · · Score: 1

      Oh, they love to be challenged.

      I was getting the "we've scanned your computer and there were errors on it" call from "Microsoft", and I played along for a little while. And then when I challenged the guy about actually working for Microsoft, he said something to the effect of the fact that he can't lie because he's from Microsoft.

      They reassert the lie as if it somehow becomes truer and less absurd the more they say it.

      --
      Some people don't believe in fairies. I don't believe in The Patriarchy.
    19. Re:Cardholder services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, there ARE call centers in the US doing the same thing. Generally they have a rule that you cannot conduct business with "potential clients" that are within a 50km (or other distance) radius of the callcenter you work at.

    20. Re:Cardholder services by BVis · · Score: 1

      Does it tell you how much of that "entitlement" spending goes to retirees and disabled veterans? Does it tell you how it's not an "entitlement" but something that the people who receive the entitlement have paid for in either cash or blood?

      If you want to fix the budget problem, cut military spending. We spend more on "defense" than the next 5 countries on the list combined.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    21. Re:Cardholder services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wrong.

      Fraud enforcement got defunded because that evil big government has decided to stay in power by handing out Obamaphones to bribe low-information voters into keeping the people in power.

      Snopes.com: Free 'Obamaphones'
      Guess how long that took to find? Less time than it took to type this message.

    22. Re:Cardholder services by TheCarp · · Score: 2

      > Likewise, when scammers call me up about my [insert model year] [insert make] [insert model] and how my
      > warranty is up, I ask them to name my warranty company

      I had fun with these guys once. I was tired of hanging up on them so I decided to hang on the line and try to get info out of the guy after they thought they might have me. So I get put on with this guy who....asks about my car!

      Lol the audacity to claim my warranty was expiring then to not even know what kind of car I have? wow. So I told them.... a 1992 bucik lesaber (this was about 5 years ago so almost a 20 year old car, and one I never owned). and I ask "oh btw what company is it you work for" I forget now, but I wrote it down and then told him, thanks for the info now you can add me to your do not call list. :)

      Despite that, he saved the car info, and I started getting calls about my 1992 buick lesaber!

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    23. Re:Cardholder services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It should be illegal to spoof caller ID. It's fraud. Lying for gain. They know that their real number would get blocked/ignored.

      It's called wire fraud.

    24. Re:Cardholder services by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps we should change caller ID schemes? Instead of showing the number that the headers are spoofing, have CID show the actual billing number. That can't be spoofed as easily as the CID headers are.

      Some of these lizards route their calls through IP phone systems to help obscure actual origins.

    25. Re:Cardholder services by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Enforcing that got defunded because big government is too busy going after potheads.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    26. Re:Cardholder services by eedwardsjr · · Score: 1

      It is illegal. It is not enforced. Very much like speeding. You can speed all day long. A lot of people will catch you do it. Only the cops catching you matter. It will probably never happen.

    27. Re:Cardholder services by eedwardsjr · · Score: 4, Funny

      I would ask them if they take a check.

    28. Re:Cardholder services by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      The issue with a lot of these companies, they operate on the borders of legal and illegal. Like the guy selling Sorney, Magnetbox and the genuine Penaphonics.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    29. Re:Cardholder services by omnichad · · Score: 1

      That would break Google Voice (and also my VoIP service where I spoof to my GV number on outgoing calls). There are legitimate reasons for spoofing caller ID.

    30. Re:Cardholder services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which part? The part that's there to actually fund the armed forces, or the large chunk that's there so that it's harder to get total numbers on assistance programs, or the part that's pure fat spreading, or the part where we pay companies to come up with new ways to rip us off? We need new rules of how we buy gear, we should cut the fat out, and the assistance programs never belonged there(the ones for vets are not the ones I'm talking about).

    31. Re:Cardholder services by tompaulco · · Score: 2

      I would ask them if they take a check.

      Not just ANY check, an out-of-state, two party, postdated, temporary, third party check. Made out for $2,000 over the disputed amount. For your trouble, please keep $1,000 of it and send the rest back in the form of a cashier's check or money order.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    32. Re:Cardholder services by MobSwatter · · Score: 1

      What I am saying is when the mob gains control of a country, you can pretty much expect anything. Like false flag events prompting war against a war tactic, holy war against Islam by a Christian nation that can no longer be capable of conducting peer review of the separation of church and state, etc, etc, etc. I think violating the do not call registry x times is on the lighter side of things, but not surprising at all.

    33. Re:Cardholder services by jmcwork · · Score: 1

      I normally hang up on these but one day I was in a 'playful' mood, so I acted very interested and very stupid: "You can lower my interest rate that much! Wow! That would be great!" He told me that he "was not some scammer trying to sell me vacation to Floriday" and he just needed my CC number. I kept the guy on the phone for almost 15 minutes while I 'looked for my credit card'. I kept asking silly questions until I finally said, "So, I think I might actually be interested in that Florida vacation". At that point he realized I was just drawing the call out. His response was "All I can say to you is eat s&*t and die. You are a real f&*k and go to hell". I felt bad for being mean (for about 2 seconds) then played the recording I made for my wife who that it was really funny.

    34. Re:Cardholder services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By Check?

    35. Re:Cardholder services by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Snicker. Another RW moron that doesn't know that Saint Reagan actually began the "Obamaphone" program.

      "The Lifeline program originated in 1984, during the administration of Ronald Reagan; it was expanded in 1996, during the administration of Bill Clinton; and its first cellular provider service (SafeLink Wireless) was launched by TracFone in 2008, during the administration of George W. Bush. All of these milestones were passed prior to the advent of the Obama administration."

      http://www.snopes.com/politics...

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    36. Re:Cardholder services by blue9steel · · Score: 2

      Twenty years ago that would have been the most important issue, nowadays "entitlement" spending dwarfs defense spending. Entitlement spending isn't as bad a thing as Republicans make it out to be, however it's also not as beneficial as Democrats claim. Military spending isn't as bad a thing as Democrats make it out to be, but neither is it as great as Republicans claim. In both cases we need to control scope creep, enact moderate efficiency reforms and rein in future growth to more reasonable levels. Good luck on that happening.

    37. Re:Cardholder services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It should be illegal to spoof caller ID. It's fraud. Lying for gain. They know that their real number would get blocked/ignored.

      It's already illegal for the most part.

      There are a few exceptions, for example if you have an IVR with a single inbound 800 number and an outbound calling bank with 100 numbers, those outbound lines can send the 800 number as their CID. But you have to own all the numbers. And you have to deliver your organization's actual name.

      The problem is that it's easy and cheap to just use an over-seas or otherwise out-of-jurisdiction originating source where CID restrictions either don't exist, or aren't enforced. Generally companies will contract with a 3rd party so they can try to claim Plausible Deniability. The regulations over the POTS require telcos to accept incoming calls regardless of the carrier source, so blacklisting problem regions isn't an option.

    38. Re:Cardholder services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love the YouTube videos of these "Microsoft" people trying to do things in a virtual machine.

      Or recordings of "Microsoft" trying to get a Linux user to run a LogMeIn (or whatever screen sharing software) executable.

    39. Re:Cardholder services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Stop being reasonable and logical.

      Slashdot is no place for such behavior.

    40. Re:Cardholder services by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Does it tell you how much of that "entitlement" spending goes to retirees and disabled veterans?

      More goes to VA than SS, so the "solution" to the entitlement problem is to put the VA under military spending. That'll cut more than 50% off the "entitlement" budget.

      Problem solved. You can even double the VA at the time.

      Nobody ever says "no" to a bump in military funding

    41. Re:Cardholder services by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      You don't "spoof" caller ID. You reassign it from one valid number that reaches you, to another valid number that reaches you. The same as if a Fortune-500 were to assign all outgoing calls from DIDs to 1-800-front-desk, so that anyone who calls you back from number alone would see the official corporate HQ number.

      That's not fraud. You aren't lying for gain. You are telling the truth. "Bob" is really calling, and his preferred number is GV#.

    42. Re:Cardholder services by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      They should enforce standards. If your CLID doesn't match one of the numbers you get from me as a provider (and you haven't discussed it with me), as the provider, I strip your CLID and put your ANI on instead. It might not be the right number to reach you back at, but it'll guarantee that any fraudulent number you list will be gone and the number presented will be consistent, so that you'll be more easily blockable.

      And I support the right to sue carriers for their negligence in this manner, allowing it to continue, because they know they make money from it, and nobody is forcing them to, so they are willing and open participants in the fraud, in most cases.

      The fixes for this are easy, and would work. Someone just has to demand that the fraud stops. And too many profit from it.

    43. Re:Cardholder services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the "next 5 countries" on the list don't send 100k of their military service persons to a patch of sand passed off as a third world country to be used as IED and automatic rifle practice targets for a decade, then when even the natives went totally ape-sh_t crazy we cut-and-ran, leaving the natives with no viable targets except themselves. Thank you Mr. "Mission Accomplished" Shrub.

    44. Re:Cardholder services by antdude · · Score: 1

      What if they spoof your location. You would be in big trouble with the drones. :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    45. Re:Cardholder services by jjbenz · · Score: 1

      but Homer, these are all cheap knock offs.

    46. Re:Cardholder services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as I'm concerned, I fully support the use of our Predator Drone program to identify, locate, and destroy these call centers (who are most certainly not calling from anywhere in the US, let alone near the area code spoofed on my caller id)

      That's rather naive. The biggest companies in the business, worldwide, are american. That accented person you talk to is either sitting in an office block near you, or logs in remotely through soft phone. The actual dialing hardware and call centers are in the USA. So good luck avoiding becoming collateral drone damage.

    47. Re:Cardholder services by MobSwatter · · Score: 1

      >Open Source Software? Computer Industry Acroniems? Soviet Russia? What /are/ you talking about?

      No:
      OSS: Office of Strategic Service
      CIA: Fucking guess
      SR: Strategic Reconnaissance

      The program was above top secret, there was a security breech so obviously it could not be developed further there. The interesting part is what else was breeched, exploited in the 80's, and what it has become today.

  21. Re:I'll pass on the money...if I get what I do wan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can keep it. I just need the money to find the A-Team.

  22. Make an example of them. by JDAustin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Fine them to the max and if they shut down, they shut down. That will wake up the rest of the corps that do this.

    1. Re:Make an example of them. by NothingWasAvailable · · Score: 1

      Agree completely (sorry, I don't have any moderator points available!)

      For the reasons stated by JDAustin, a corporation must die before the others start to think "Hey, maybe we should obey the laws!"

      It appears that one or two financial companies every decade or so just isn't sufficient to keep corporations in line.

    2. Re:Make an example of them. by blagger99 · · Score: 2

      A more realistic method of getting corporations to actually obey laws is to hold the people who run those corporations individually responsible for the malfeasance, starting with the CEO. Fine the company too, but fine the executives. And how about a three-strikes law for those executives? Three offenses equals mandatory jail time.

      Now that's a three-strikes law I can get behind.

    3. Re:Make an example of them. by NoKaOi · · Score: 1

      The quarter ending 6/30/2014 shows Dish Network had a net profit of $213Million. Considering the penalty could be up to $912Billion, a full year's worth of net (not even gross, so the year would be a draw, not even a loss) profit should be the minimum . That would be $852Million, any thing less is just a slap on the wrist.

      By the way, the article is from early this morning, but Dish Network's shares are up 3.4%. Clearly shareholders aren't taking this seriously, so why should the company's executives take it seriously? They need to be made to take it seriously.

    4. Re:Make an example of them. by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      No, don't die, we need more competition from residential telecoms. It's better to have 3 stooges to select from than 2. The alternatives are also dicks.

    5. Re:Make an example of them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the reasons stated by JDAustin, a corporation must die before the others start to think "Hey, maybe we should obey the laws!"

      There are plenty of crooks that have the habit of starting small businesses to do petty crimes, then bring them into bankruptcy and repeat with a new company.
      Slap on the wrist is for first time offenders, bankruptcy for the second. If a board member is involved in an activity like that a third time nothing but jail time is going to stop him.

  23. Re:Let's forgive Dish and move on by phoenix_V · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm sorry, I don't get it.

    You seem to be implying that I should care that you, an admitted telemarketer, might be put out of a job along with four others.

    I just don't understand your position.

    I believe his post indicates he is an installer, not a telemarketer. Huge difference as he would be the guy climbing on the roof for people who do want DISH's service.

  24. I was going with.. by s.petry · · Score: 3, Funny

    See what happens when you mess with Fox network?

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  25. tip of the iceberg by tloh · · Score: 2

    It likely isn't just DISH. I registered years ago with the national do-not-call list years ago and things have always been rather quiet. However, since last year, the number of nuisance calls to my home has increased dramatically. I'd first chalked it up the the elections. But even after the elections were over, the calls kept coming. Sometimes the numbers are spoofed, sometimes its "dead air", sometimes its a recorded message, but they all qualify as the type of unwanted calls the DNC list was supposed to protect us from. A few have confirmed their own similar experience when I complained about my problem on reddit. Does anyone know what the hell is going on with this thing? I'm sure where there is smoke there is fire.

    --
    Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
    1. Re:tip of the iceberg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You put your phone number on a list of confirmed active numbers and you're surprised that someone is calling you?

  26. Doesn't Matter. by Rhyas · · Score: 2

    Until they automate, or at least expedite, the process of a consumer getting fines/money back from the telemarketers and corporations using laws already on the books, this whole DNC thing is meaningless. (Note, all the tools necessary to do this are already in place in some form or another) But that will never happen so truly DNC is, and always has been, a worthless thing.

  27. Re:Let's forgive Dish and move on by Brad1138 · · Score: 1

    Where did I say anywhere that we were telemarketers? I stated telemarketers are the "bad guys" .Word of mouth is our best advertising.

    My point is, we have played by the rules, care for our customers, don't telemarket or anything like it (door to door etc.) and we are in jeopardy of loosing our business because of the ass hole telemarketers.

    As for a car analogy, go step in front of a bus, preferably while it is moving.

    --
    If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
  28. XM radio is next by bobjr94 · · Score: 1

    Wife bought a car, xm called upto 4 time per day trying to get us to subscribe once the free trial ran out. We flat out said we are not interested stop calling and 15 minutes later they would call back.

    1. Re:XM radio is next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better be. Fucking assholes were told not to call. I might have gotten service with them as I've been in a friend's car where it's been useful when on a long trip.

      After their phone calls. HELL FUCKING NO.

  29. Dish Network now Dish Network, Inc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whoopdy do. They spend $500 on a new incorporation, or fifty, divide assets and fold the one arm left holding the bag. Problem solved at a cost of nearly nothing.

  30. The real problem... by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is that the phone company is allowed to let callers lie about their identity via caller ID.

    If all commercial calls could be incontrovertibly tied to corporate officers, a lot of this nonsense would end quickly.

    1. Re:The real problem... by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      Or heck, just hit the phone company execs with a criminal conspiracy to commit fraud charge.

    2. Re:The real problem... by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      "Is that the phone company is allowed to let callers lie about their identity via caller ID."

      It's a TCPA violation to present falsified caller-ID.

    3. Re:The real problem... by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      It's a TCPA violation to present falsified caller-ID.

      I'll take your word for it. But it's still happening, so apparently there's an enforcement gap.

  31. Use the fines to go after the rest of them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DISH has a market cap of $16 billion. I say fine them enough to seriously hurt them (a billion?) and use the money to buy resources to go after and shut down all the other offenders.

  32. The Irony of Law by JimSadler · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Despite the fact that dish Network is superior to 99% of the telemarketing companies due to the fact that Dish network actually delivers a product instead of simply taking your money and delivering nothing they are the ones that get hammered by the law. The sick part of this is that the DOJ prosecutes only a dozen or so telemarketing companies a year and they go after the ones that can pay large fines exclusively. That leaves the merry bands of thireves who are less succesful free to keep ripping people off endlessly. And unlike other issues this one is easy to solve. Each town should advertise to get homes that voluntier to be honey pots that record each and every phone call into the home. That way they could raid every telemarketing room in the US if any laws are broken at all in the solicitation. Usually the people who actually do the calling are not aware that they are commiting major crimes. The managers and owners are the ones that need to be in prisons. I've even seen an unskilled and unkowning grandma made the room manger as the room new they would be raided. The old woman had no clue and was convicted of felonies. One Nation Under God With Idiocy And Injustice For All.

    1. Re:The Irony of Law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Won't work AT&T and the other telcoms must be making money off of this as they refuse to provide the ANI info for these calls to their own customers. Which protects the telemarketers. The only reason they would do this is if they have some financial incentive to protect them so somehow big telcom is making $$$ off of this.

  33. get off my lawn by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1

    I don't have caller id - I've saved multiple thousands of dollars by not adding it to my (*cough*) land line service.

    Of course, I never answer that line either... it is for receiving (*cough*) faxes, and making outgoing calls.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:get off my lawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Charging for caller ID on landlines is a scam (like pretty much everything about telecommunications billing), but I've never seen cell phone service without caller ID. You don't have to pay extra. Then again, if someone is calling my cellphone it's almost certainly a spam call of some sort. (I usually ignore it and do a web search on the number revealing people complaining about some sort of spam with that caller ID.)

    2. Re:get off my lawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You had to pay for CLIP service for years in many European countries.

    3. Re:get off my lawn by omnichad · · Score: 1

      You only get limited caller ID with cellular. It's not like they do a name lookup (they sure could for landlines callers at least).

    4. Re:get off my lawn by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      Charging for caller ID on landlines is a scam (like pretty much everything about telecommunications billing), but I've never seen cell phone service without caller ID.

      I'm guessing you're not old enough to have ever had analog cell-phone service. I don't recall if caller ID was even offered as an add-on service, but I know I didn't have it with my phone and my service. Vibrating call alert and an 8-character dot-matrix alphanumeric LED readout (so you could attach names to the phone numbers stored in memory!) were expensive enough.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    5. Re:get off my lawn by Sable+Drakon · · Score: 1

      Depends on your phone actually. I know that with mine (Samsung i9300 running CM11-M12), the dialer actually performs an OpenCNAM search on all inbound calls. So I do get more than just their supposed terminating number.

      --
      The Amarri pray for god, the Caldari pray for profit. the Gallente pray for peace, but the Minmatar pray their ships hol
    6. Re:get off my lawn by omnichad · · Score: 1

      That's a search from software - not from the phone provider/infrastructure. I get your point, since that's technically possible on any Android phone (not that I've seen any Play store dialers that have this).

    7. Re:get off my lawn by Sable+Drakon · · Score: 1

      It's CM's own dialer, I don't run too much atop of stock CM with respect to built-in functions. From the look, it's based around the AOSP dialer for 4.*.*, specificly the stock 4.4.4 software itself. Just added functions written into it. Similar relationship with Trebuchet/GoogLancher.

      --
      The Amarri pray for god, the Caldari pray for profit. the Gallente pray for peace, but the Minmatar pray their ships hol
  34. Can't prosecute them if you can't catch them by billstewart · · Score: 1

    My assumption, since the entire country has been annoyed at Rachel and her ilk for years, and since the FBI could easily get warrants to search for her even if the NSA didn't pwn the phone companies, is that either

    • - It's really a Russian scam, out of their jurisdiction, or
    • - They're a distributed scam, run by lots and lots of people who can buy a "Rachel from Cardholder Services" audio recording kit, hire work-at-home telemarketers, and run their own cottage industry, so if they do get caught, the scam keeps going, or (like old-fashioned spammers in trailer parks) maybe they don't make as much money as the folks selling the kit promised them, so they go out of business and other scammers take up the slack.
    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Can't prosecute them if you can't catch them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear her boyfriend has been dating Sharon, my local Google specialist, behind her back. If I was her I wouldn't let that happen.

  35. Abandoned calls - heh by billstewart · · Score: 1

    95-99% of the calls to my home phone are from robots. Some are friendly robots ("Your prescription is ready at CVS"), most are spammer robots. I finally got fed up and put the number on the Do Not Call List, and the main change has been that more robots call me and either don't play a recording at all, or else play a recording but if I press "1" to talk to their human, never connect me to a human. (And I almost always tell them I want to; usually I'll put the phone down, sometimes I'll chew them out, often I'll put the phone down and if somebody answers, I'll say "hello" and then put the phone down.)

    Back when I used to design call center equipment, in the 80s, phone calls cost more per minute than operators. These days that's totally changed, so it doesn't cost them much to make calls and abandon them if they don't have a spare operator within a few seconds; it's not like they're worried about losing repeat business.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Abandoned calls - heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I used to design call center equipment

      Karma's a bitch.

    2. Re:Abandoned calls - heh by Krojack · · Score: 1

      These days that's totally changed, so it doesn't cost them much to make calls and abandon them

      More and more robo calls are made from hacked Asterisk servers. This cost them zero yet the owner of the hacked Asterisk server often gets a bill in the tens of thousands.

      Also when I get someone calling me and trying to offer me services of some sort, I instantly start talking over them and try to sell them various services my job offers. Two can play at that game.

    3. Re:Abandoned calls - heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's really not such a bad business. Most companies that aren't into direct sales don't use random dialing, they work with panels (i.e. people who specifically signed up to participate). The problem is that those that do use random dialing cause all the problems and do so on a massive scale. It's no different from email, the presence of spam doesn't make the medium or most of those who use it evil, just the bloody spammers.

    4. Re:Abandoned calls - heh by serialband · · Score: 1

      You should really just press 9 right at the beginning of the robocall. Most of the robots use that as a way to automatically put you on their Do Not Call Lists. I sat through the first few when they first started robocalls to figure out the menu structures. In the beginning it was a mix of 9 and 2 for the robocall DNC, but I think they've mostly standardized to 9 and I haven't been getting calls. I did recently get a Spanish robocall at work that used 2 instead of 9 for their DNC, but once I figured that out, I've stopped getting them.

      The original way to stop calls was to ask for their name, company and call back number for the company. Then you asked to be put on their local DNC list and note the date somewhere. They are legally required to keep on their list for a year. If they call back within the year, you have the right to take them to small claims court for $500. They usually won't ever bother removing you from their lists because it's too much trouble and you're likely to ask to be put back on the list. They also don't want to go to the trouble in case they did mess up the date and you do happen to sue them outside their state. You just need to put in 1-2 month of effort in actually answering the call and the calls will stop. It's much easier with a robocall; just push 9 as soon as you hear the robot and it hangs up immediately and you don't have to hear the whole spiel.

      The National Do Not Call list is a scam by the politicians. It was created for the stupid people that don't understand that there was already a Do Not Call Protection in place or the lazy people that didn't want to put in a tiny amount of effort to stop the calls. Putting yourself on the DNC list puts you on the political call lists. You've given them a valid number to look up. They put in an exemption for themselves. I know some people that did used the DNC list and they're now getting nuisance calls during election season.

  36. Fine them the lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take the company out of share holders hand, put in a new board of directors and sell it to someone else to pay off the fines.

  37. Dramatized Outcome by some+old+guy · · Score: 2

    Court: Dish, you've been bad.
    Dish: Ouch! My wrist!
    Dish equity holders: Thank you, Court. The check is in the mail.

    --
    Scruting the inscrutable for over 50 years.
  38. It could be... by Coditor · · Score: 1

    .. Comcast conveniently ratted them out. Now there are no heroes in this story.

  39. I used to have dish... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...then one day i got a telemarketing call trying to sell me dish service (which as i just mentioned i already had)

    I immediately called them up & canceled service, complaining that i refuse to do business with telemarketers or companies that support them.

    Fuck Dish network.

  40. In other news.. by vinlud · · Score: 1

    Dish Network stock has been going up lately, isn't that crazy

    --
    Repeat after me: We are all individuals
  41. How many roofs were ruined by Dish installations by Slim_Jack · · Score: 1

    Dish installations often put a number of holes through the roofs, and water damage often follows behind. How many of those installations now have messed up roofs?

  42. Re:The Irony of ignorant people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Though it's true that there are a LOT of criminal minded call centers it does not mean they are all that way. Every company that uses a phone to sell is considered a call center. But the criminally minded ones makes so much noise that the industry as a whole look like a really bad idea.

    Which begs the question what really makes a person turn criminal and rip others off?

    Usually it's the idea that they cannot deliver an honest day's production. The crime is an unusual solution, a not so bright idea on how to get around the problem, in short. The standard solution is to get a job performing some action. The person decides that's not really doable, may it be because of not feeling skilled or competent enough, or maybe because of having some warped idea of their own esteemed value and feel it below them to actually work. At that point it's a downward spiral.

    Take a little kid. They all want to contribute. If you let them they will probably grow up ready to do an honest days work. If not you put them on a path of criminal think. What would you do if you could not keep up with kids in school? Work harder studying? When the kid start to feel disassociated from society they disaccociate from society and go their own way. That's how gangs are formed. Which is why it's so important to help kids in school.

    So there's the real solution to telmerketers pestering you. Help each and every kid contribute from an early age and don't let them fall behind in school. Not by using force because that's a wate of time. But by being in communication with understanding with each child. Never talk down to a child, that only shows how poor your control of the situation is and is not helping the child. They are real persons with still growing bodies. Talk with them as adults.

  43. Doesn't surprise me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to get junk faxes from Disk Network affiliates all the time. So them moving to bad telemarketing just seem like business-as-usual for them in my opinion.

  44. TX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much power would you have to transmit to damage a satellite?

  45. SEE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I told everybody you can't rely on the "Do not call" nonsense. All it does is put your name on another list.

  46. Kick them out by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    Good. Put them out of business once and for all.

  47. Cost of business by Rigel47 · · Score: 1

    As someone who gets 2-4 pre-recorded calls a day on his cell phone (that has been registered on DoNotCall) I have nothing but contempt and disdain for the FCC. If you look through their settlements page you'll see that in the rare instance they prosecute a case they invariably settle for whatever profits were made by the criminal. No jail time, no seizing of all personal assets. This is akin to making a thief put back what they stole as punishment. It's no wonder these robo-calling scum keep doing what they do.

    What's galling is that the FCC prosecutors have their cases made for them. Hundreds if not thousands of people attest to having received calls from x number on x date promising x services by filing complaints at FCC.gov. It's a slam dunk. Yet the useless fucks are so ineffectual that the crooks have no reason not to keep trying.

  48. Shame you can't get rid of your phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not yet anyway.

    I yearn for an age where I can live without a phone. But friends and relatives still use them :(

    1. Re:Shame you can't get rid of your phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Set up a whitelist. If it's not a friend/family, it doesn't get through.

  49. Re:How many roofs were ruined by Dish installation by Brad1138 · · Score: 1

    If the dish is installed properly, it doesn't damage the roof. It is more about cheap install companies that do crappy work, not a systemic problem.

    --
    If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
  50. Re:.912 *Billion dollars. by fxsoap · · Score: 1

    I'm just curious, is that the actual amount? $57 only? If that's the case they saved a but load of money! Then they only owe $2,964,000,000

  51. Re:.912 *Billion dollars. by davester666 · · Score: 1

    No, the total fine for all the calls will be closer to $57 than $0.912 billion. I will be surprised if the fine exceeds $1m.

    --
    Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  52. Dish customers... by Infiniti2000 · · Score: 2

    Expect your prices to go up in direct proportion to any fines levied.

  53. Legit reasons by phorm · · Score: 1

    There are legitimate reasons for doing it. Businesses which essentially have the telephone equivalent of a NAT (lots of inside lines, only a few incoming numbers), or forwarding etc.

    People with VOIP lines may have only an outgoing line with no number to call back. I've had this and used my cellular # for call-display.

    That said, there should be a way to authorize or verify numbers for caller-ID purposes, perhaps by sending a text message or confirmation call with a passcode. Then, only those who have registered a number can use it for caller-ID purposes.

    1. Re:Legit reasons by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      "Spoof" to me doesn't mean "re-write". It means "re-write to an invalid value". I would not consider re-writing a CLID to a valid one that reaches you "spoofing" even if it's re-written.

      If I meant that re-writing should be illegal, not spoofing, then I'd have said "people should be banned by law from sending CLID, and all lines should be identified by their ANI or equivelent"

      Nobody calls NAT "IP Spoofing". IP spoofing is used to refer to IP-re-writing where the resultant IP is unrelated to the actual origin of the packet. Re-write IPs all you want. That's not spoofing (unless done for nefarious reasons that break the end-to-end nature of IP).

  54. Confiscate the company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's that, the fine exceeds the company's market cap?

    In that case, cancel all their outstanding stock, and have the government issue new stock shares for sale. The government gets to keep the proceeds of the stock sale, and the new owners can have a shareholders meeting to figure out what to do with the company now.

  55. called Canadians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I worked for a grey market company in Canada about 15 years ago where Canadians would subscribe and use u.s. mailboxes.

    We'd change their Canadian phone number area code to Washington for easy system.

    At one point, a customers account was disabled due to non-payment. When we investigated, the customer was called by dish to off starz/encore and the extra $10/month wasn't being paid because we didn't know.

    They called his area code 604 number. When we called dish, they still had the area code as 509.

    So they were going by receivers that bought ppv's that called into dish and dish went by that list instead of actual phone number on the account.

    Yes, dtv and dish knew they had sizeable Canadian customers for years.

  56. Re:Let's forgive Dish and move on by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't worry about Dish even in the worst case scenarion. Here's how it would go down:

    FCC: You violated Do Not Call 57 million times. Times $16,000 per, that's, lessee...

    Dish: I can't afford that! I guess we're bamkrupt. :(

    FCC: Ohwell, sux 2 B U!

    FCC: No, sux to be you!

    FCC: Whaaaaaaa???

    AFCC: Yes, when assigning spectrum, we promised Congress there would always be at least two satellite cable networks.

    FCC: Rats!

    Dish: Ha ha!

    FCC: Yeah, ha ha!

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  57. Call center design by billstewart · · Score: 1

    This was back before the World Wide Web, when call centers were primarily toll-free numbers that you called to get information from companies, make airline reservations, etc. It was either people you wanted to talk to, or people you had to call anyway like the electric company.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  58. Also massive spammers by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

    Dish have been spamming various addresses of mine for over a decade.

    They're unrepentant recidivists and deserve to be taken out of business.

  59. Opt-in only by MoarSauce123 · · Score: 1

    Congress needs to pass legislation that limits any phone, email, and fax interaction solely on an opt-in basis and opt-out requests need to be handled within a day (not this "you will be removed from our mailing list in 6-8 weeks"). This needs to include political campaigns as well. The only exception is reverse 911 for obvious reasons.

  60. But thats wrong by johncandale · · Score: 1

    Fines big enough to cause a shareholder revolt will have a lasting effect

    Um no. Most of these companies voting stocks are controlled by company insiders these days. OR the company is so huge, even 8 figure fines don't put a dent the companies earnings to bother anyone rich enough to own enough shares to start a shareholder revolt. The modern "public" stock market is broken.

    It would be much better to put the "interchangeable" people in a real jail for a meaningful amount of time. To put the fear of god into their replacements. Do it enough times....

  61. The solution by nessman · · Score: 1

    When telemarketers start being publicly executed by firing squad for DNC violations, maybe then they'll start taking notice.

    Problem is - overseas call centers using spoofed CLID tables and SIP trunks to the United States that are beyond the reach of state and federal law. Not a thing we can do about it. Anyone with a few years experience with a PBX knowledge of SIP trunks or PRI's can figure this out easily. Hardware is cheap, software is freely available.

  62. Re:.912 *Billion dollars. by fxsoap · · Score: 1

    wha...t? Why is it so much lower? How did that number change so drastically?

  63. Re:.912 *Billion dollars. by davester666 · · Score: 1

    because if their fine was higher, they would close up shop and go into some other business. it's the only way they will keep on "serving" their customers.

    --
    Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!