Slashdot Mirror


Young Cubans Set Up Mini-Internet

An anonymous reader writes: Internet connections remain illegal for Cuban households, but many of the country's citizens still want to tap into the power of networked information exchange. A group of tech-savvy young Cubans has set up a network comprising thousands of computers to serve as their own miniature version of the internet. They use chat rooms, play games, and connect to organize real-life activities. Cuban law enforcement seems willing to tolerate it (so far), but the network polices itself so as not to draw undue attention.

One of the engineers who helped build the network said, "We aren't anonymous because the country has to know that this type of network exists. They have to protect the country and they know that 9,000 users can be put to any purpose. We don't mess with anybody. All we want to do is play games, share healthy ideas. We don't try to influence the government or what's happening in Cuba ... We do the right thing and they let us keep at it."

37 of 141 comments (clear)

  1. Saddest line ever by Crashmarik · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We don't mess with anybody. All we want to do is play games, share healthy ideas. We don't try to influence the government or what's happening in Cuba We do the right thing and they let us keep at it.

    If you ever want to see how soul destroying communism is there it is. Might as well still have the country controlled by the Mafia, at least it would be more fun.

    1. Re:Saddest line ever by captainpanic · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Let's see you try to overthrow your government and post about it on the internet. Let's see how long you keep your free internet access (and your freedom in general).

    2. Re:Saddest line ever by houghi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This has nothing to do with Communism. It has everything to do with oversight and more about agencies abusing that oversight.
      Mind you, many western countries are running towards the same model where everybody is being watched and the slightest will make your life miserable. People will soon start to whisper. I already notice how I am wording things, because I know that in a few years what I said now WILL be used against me.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    3. Re:Saddest line ever by Crashmarik · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hmm Seeing as Marx himself did the same, I have to wonder how this is a result of American Propaganda

      From the communist manifesto

      We see then that the first step in the working class' revolution is to make the proletariat the ruling class. It will use its political power to seize all capital from the bourgeoisie and to centralize all instruments of production under the auspices of the State. Of course, in the beginning this will not be possible without "despotic inroads on the rights of property, and on the conditions of bourgeois production."

      You need to explain to me how having the government be the economy and control all means of production renders communism a purely economic philosophy ?

    4. Re:Saddest line ever by Crashmarik · · Score: 2

      http://www.htmlgraphic.com/cre...

      There you go, all you have to do is convince your neighbors to join in. But you know part of an enlightened democracy is they have the right to say no.

    5. Re:Saddest line ever by halivar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When every article about a communist, pseudo-communist, or crypto-communist country has to have a post like this (and it's in every thread), it's time to start thinking about why and how all communist countries (save, perhaps, India) become totalitarian hell-holes, and whether communism as a pure ideology is too hopelessly broken to implement in reality. Not to mention that it seems to me that no Scottish communism on earth is True Scottish communism.

      Western democracies are heading in that direction, but so far every country with a communist economic model has to start there.

    6. Re:Saddest line ever by Crashmarik · · Score: 2

      Well you are stating in a public forum that you think the TSA is a repression of the people by the government, are comfortable doing so, and I assume are doing things to see it's abolished ?

      I think you contradicted your own position.

      I have many friends that came here from Cuba. Would you care to argue with them ?

      P.S. They wouldn't be nearly as polite as myself.

      P.P.S. That would be if they managed to stop laughing.

    7. Re:Saddest line ever by Crashmarik · · Score: 2

      Don't they consider themselves Socialist ? as opposed to Communist ?

    8. Re:Saddest line ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The fact that you just made that statement without fear of being killed is indicative of the difference.

    9. Re:Saddest line ever by rmdingler · · Score: 4, Insightful
      It has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried. {Winston Churchill}

      As you sit comfortably in your home and life sheltered by a Western democracy, it is all too easy to take for granted the freedoms you enjoy. Stories like this are about the rest of the World's citizens, and what happens when individual rights go away.

      Relish this when you have a moment, but never, ever, stop struggling to protect the erosion of these inalienable rights. Totalitarian regimes aren't all born beneath a single governing style or philosophy.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    10. Re:Saddest line ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The only two options are not "complete and total freedom to do anything you want" and "complete control by a dictatorship". no country is going to allow folks to plot a violent overthrow of the government. But being able to criticize the government is a basic human right that does not exist in Cuba. Granted the US is not perfect, or close to it, but we are a lot more free than our Cuban counterparts.

    11. Re:Saddest line ever by markass530 · · Score: 2

      Sorry, try that BS somewhere else, cuba has a lower life expectancy,

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L...

    12. Re:Saddest line ever by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Let's see you try to overthrow your government and post about it on the internet. Let's see how long you keep your free internet access (and your freedom in general).

      Right now, any dickwad in America is free to put up a website advocating abolishment of the American government. And indeed, many of them have. Further, there is in fact a completely legal process for elimination of the constitution; you could pass an Amendment replacing it with another document. Nothing prevents anyone from starting a political party on this basis. I bet if I were less lazy I could find some really batshit crazy examples right now, but I equally bet that some people out there in Slashdot-land already know of some. I hope they will help out and link them here.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:Saddest line ever by NotDrWho · · Score: 2

      Let's see you try to overthrow your government and post about it on the internet. Let's see how long you keep your free internet access (and your freedom in general).

      Wait, are we talking about Cuba or the U.S.?

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    14. Re:Saddest line ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      First, India isn't Communist, nor has it ever been Communist.

      Second, All of these communist countries have been relatively poor countries to start, with little to no industrial base, unlike the West. Therefore these Communist countries tried to experiment with the economy, using state led growth to boost their industry and compete with the US in a game of catchup. This led to an authoritarian state.

      Other countries that were further along in economic development were able to implement socialist states that weren't failure, e.g. many states in Western Europe. Perhaps in time, they can move towards Marx's vision of a Communist state, where not only does one have negative freedoms/liberties, but positive freedoms/liberties as well.

    15. Re:Saddest line ever by chispito · · Score: 2

      Let's see you try to overthrow your government and post about it on the internet. Let's see how long you keep your free internet access (and your freedom in general).

      You missed his point entirely. What you're pointing out makes the kid's comment even sadder.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    16. Re:Saddest line ever by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Funny

      You are *so* cool! I bet you have a neckbeard too!

      I sure do, but any time I go visit a new contract or even just go on vacation, I shave it. It's not an attachment or an affectation, I just don't measure my value by the cleanliness of my neck. It's not my fault I was born hairier than the average bear.

      But hey, thanks for recognizing how great I am. I could use the publicity.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    17. Re:Saddest line ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      He didn't say violent overthrow. He said abolishment. That indicates a process involving a Constitutional Congress ratifying an amendment to the existing Constitution that invalidates it and establishes its replacement document.

      Even if you act on this, nobody is going to arrest you for doing anything illegal. It's not illegal. It's not treasonous. It's just simply "governance". Laws change all of the time. There's nothing preventing the constitution from being changed either, except a somewhat cumbersome process (and that's by design).

    18. Re:Saddest line ever by Crashmarik · · Score: 2

      "It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses."

      Just my favorite line from the movie.

        Anyway seeing as I wasn't familiar with their government, decided "why curse the darkness when you can light a candle"

      http://www.economist.com/news/...

      Since then the Nordics have changed course—mainly to the right. Government’s share of GDP in Sweden, which has dropped by around 18 percentage points, is lower than France’s and could soon be lower than Britain’s. Taxes have been cut: the corporate rate is 22%, far lower than America’s. The Nordics have focused on balancing the books. While Mr Obama and Congress dither over entitlement reform, Sweden has reformed its pension system (see Free exchange). Its budget deficit is 0.3% of GDP; America’s is 7%.

      On public services the Nordics have been similarly pragmatic. So long as public services work, they do not mind who provides them. Denmark and Norway allow private firms to run public hospitals. Sweden has a universal system of school vouchers, with private for-profit schools competing with public schools. Denmark also has vouchers—but ones that you can top up. When it comes to choice, Milton Friedman would be more at home in Stockholm than in Washington, DC.

      It seems they have a very interesting hybrid model based around pragmatism rather than ideology. So they fail Marx and Engels on the mandatory state control of the means of production.

    19. Re:Saddest line ever by houghi · · Score: 2

      Paranoia is when you THINK you are being watched. I KNOW I am being watched. Huge difference.
      People are getting fired because they said something on Facebook. Something people would never had to worry about in the past. You did something in a pub when drunk and a few people would laugh about it. Most would perhaps have no idea who you were and if you saw them at a job interview a week later and sober, they would have no idea.
      Now I have no idea if that will be the case. He could just have seen my picture on some random website.

      So yeah, I WISH it was paranoia. Much more pleasant then what we have now.

      And yet I do not post as AC. (Although perhaps I did and I am now replying to my own comment.)

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    20. Re:Saddest line ever by NotDrWho · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, I'm sure Raoul Castro would be okay with you coming up with a plan to abolish or restructure the Cuban government, provided any such abolishment or restructuring went through the proper channel of getting Raoul Castro's approval first.

      Ditto with China. I doubt they would even blink an eye at your website entitled "My plan to abolish the Chinese government, with the prior approval and properly-obtained consent of the Chinese government."

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    21. Re:Saddest line ever by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The difference is every few years in democratic nations you have the chance to over through the government legally.
      It is called a free election.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  2. outsider question: why the USA embargo on Cuba? by fantomas · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Not a flamebait question/troll even though it might seem so!

    This article does indeed show how folk can be creative under a restrictive government: the Cuban authorities don't look like the victim when they are not allowing their own citizens access to the internet (anybody know what their justification is - I'd be interested to know the official reasoning).

    But on the other side and in a more general sense, can somebody tell me why the USA still has an embargo against Cuba? (sensible answers only please). It's really perplexing for an outsider so reasonable answers would be welcomed. The USA doesn't have a problem with quite open trade and relations with other nominally communist states (e.g. China, Vietnam). It doesn't mind trading with other countries it was at war with 50 years ago. It doesn't mind trading with countries who had /still have nuclear missiles pointing at it. It doesn't mind embracing countries with poor human rights records.

    Is it because of the proximity of Cuba, or some other reason? Really curious, feels like an odd hang over from a cold war that finished before many slashdotters were born...

    cheers!

    1. Re:outsider question: why the USA embargo on Cuba? by will_die · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It stays because there is a large group of voters in Florida who still want it and the rest of the country that could care less if it is there or not. Then on the Cuba side they have always done what they can to keep it because it gave Fidel a ralleying cry on why Cuba is in so bad of shape.
      With current talks will have to see what happens.

    2. Re:outsider question: why the USA embargo on Cuba? by Richard_at_work · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've thought this on a couple of occasions - the US political movement seems to have a not inconsiderable number of people who are more interested in using their political stature to support other countries rather than their own. So you have a large number of voters and politicians who consider Cuba to be their primary voting area, and another larger number of voters and politicians who consider Israel to be their primary voting area.

      Stop leaning hard on Cuba, suddenly theres huge outcry from pressure groups and politicians who threaten all sorts of things (see the recent threats by several Congressmen and Senators who shouted loudly that the Cuban embargo laws would never be lifted).

      Stop supporting Israel or cut the amount of funding to Israel, suddenly theres huge outcry from pressure groups and politicians who denounce any and all who don't consider Israel of the utmost importance.

      To outsiders looking in, it does look like there are many groups and people who value other countries more than they value their "own" country.

    3. Re:outsider question: why the USA embargo on Cuba? by will_die · · Score: 4, Informative

      The embargo against cuba did nto really start until the 1960s, before then there were arms embargoes.
      It did start as you mentioned after Cuba seized a few US companies assets, US did a minor embargo, Cuba went in seized all other companies and the US started embargoing most trade.
      Since then the embargo has been attempted to be lifted but the political backlash from Florida and a decent amount of voters in the rest of the US has stopped it. With Fidel gone and the communist threat basically dead it is now just the voters in florida, and sugar producers who really care about it.
      As for all those properties that is something that is being discussed now and will have to be decided upon. Another major problem is going to be who owns the trademark names to various products. For example Bacardi, now USA but originally cubian, has trademarks they say they own while a company in Cuba also claims it; while there is an embargo and neither company can sell in other place it is meanless legal fight once the embargo is gone now it is a major international legal dispute.

    4. Re:outsider question: why the USA embargo on Cuba? by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 2

      why the USA still has an embargo against Cuba? (sensible answers only please).

      Votes.

      You get the old-people-who-still-fear-those-godless-red-bastards vote, and you get the Cuban exile vote. And you get the agriculture vote, because we grow a hell of a lot more corn than sugar.

      Almost everything produced in the U.S. uses high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) rather than sugar and there is a difference. Being a LOT of Mexican stores around I go to them as anything sold there is authentic and made of real sugar, and my source of Coca-Cola for one.

      "The use of HFCS in the United States is partially attributable to government tariffs that maintain domestic sugar prices at above the global price and subsidies to corn growers that lower the cost of the primary ingredient in HFCS, corn. Since 1797 there have been a system of sugar tariffs and sugar quotas in the United States that maintains the price of imported sugar at levels up to twice the global price" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H...

  3. Compuserv, is that you?

  4. If by "some fucked up stuff" by MikeRT · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You mean like torture and murder of political dissidents, people being routinely thrown into prison for speech that is not only legal but won't have US law enforcement even raise an eyebrow and various other tyrannical sundries then yeah. They can't own a cell phone or computer without the state's permission, but hey... free healthcare people!

    This just goes to show how pathetic a lot of leftists are. But but Cuba has some great, free healthcare. Yeah? Cuba's also politically and economically FUBAR to the nth degree compared to even most of Latin America. There's a reason Cubans are more likely to expatriate than people in, say, Guatemala, the Dominican Republic or Honduras to try to sneak into Cuba.

    1. Re:If by "some fucked up stuff" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You mean like torture and murder of political dissidents, people being routinely thrown into prison

      I thought for a second you were describing the US there. I guess its ok to torture and murder as long as you call them terrorists. As for the number of people put into prison: throwing stones, glass houses etc.

    2. Re:If by "some fucked up stuff" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why did you cut "for speech" off the end of "people being routinely thrown into prison"?

    3. Re:If by "some fucked up stuff" by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This just goes to show how pathetic a lot of leftists are. But but Cuba has some great, free healthcare. Yeah? Cuba's also politically and economically FUBAR to the nth degree

      Leftists including myself bring up Cuba's health care system to show that even a country which is totally busted politically and economically can manage a national health care system which provides outcomes as good as what we have now (which ain't that great, but bear with this argument) for pennies on the dollar. It's not that we should go commie, it's that even the commies can manage health care. Here in the allegedly greatest nation in the world, the only magnificent part of our health care system is the size of the bill.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  5. Cuban Royston Vasey by waferthinmint · · Score: 2

    "This is a local net for local people; we'll have no trouble here!"

  6. Thanks everybody for reasoned answers! by fantomas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Thanks for your reasoned and sensible answers, really good insights. I appreciate your time in giving me some perspectives I'd not considered.

    Not something you hear on slashdot every day :-)

  7. Don't believe everything you read... by gwolf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Cubans *do* have access to Internet. I (Mexican) have been there several times. In 1998, I became a close friend with a Cuban university teacher, and in 2000 I travelled to Cuba with tens of Linux and Free Software books, hundreds of CDs with distros of the day. I was quite in close contact with the Linux user groups in Santiago and La Habana, and less so but still met some people from Pinar del Río and Baracoa.
    My friend later moved to Spain. Yes, he didn't go out the most legal way there is — But he kept in touch with his family. I kept in touch with his family as well (Internet access is not restricted to the university). His mother and his sister both travelled to Spain to visit him, and went back to Cuba.
    I went again to Cuba in 2010; I stayed at the Universidad de las Ciencias Informáticas, ~10Km from the capital. The university is in a decomissioned soviet naval base; it is a huge university city, with hundreds of student dorm apartments. Every apartment has a computer connected to Internet. They do have strict quotas, but they all have network access.
    The embargo, as you mention really harms Cuba. The country is clearly among the materially poorest I have visited. Hopefully things will now improve. No, it's not (only?) a communist regime that has kept them from developing.

  8. Most of our problems are government policy by MikeRT · · Score: 2

    If the states would each accredit a new medical school, expand seating by 25-50% in core medical programs and such, we could easily start matching Cuba on the professional supply side. The AMA and others won't go for that because it would mean forcing highly paid medical professionals to get competitive on their salaries and such. How about the states start applying price gouging laws? How about they start requiring posting of all fee schedules at medical establishments so consumers can price shop? How about they start throwing doctors in prison for quietly bringing in partners who are out of network so the practice can bill at much higher rates?

    Just as radical, how about we start demanding that health insurance act like real insurance. Meaning...
    1. It only covers things which are reasonably outside of the person's control.
    2. It covers them absolutely past the deductible which should be reasonable.
    3. If the buyer becomes indigent once the emergency happens, the insurance company cannot stop paying just because premiums are no longer being paid and the insurance company cannot lawfully back bill for premiums lost when the insured incident happened and the buyer was unable to pay.

  9. Saddest line ever by njnnja · · Score: 2

    Precisely. Whenever people try to make a moral equivalence between some Western nations like the US or UK and some totalitarian hellhole by saying, "The US starts wars too" or "The US discriminates against minorities too" they should remember this kid's quote. But not the bolded part that parent highlights, rather the sentence before it - "We don't try to influence the government or what's happening in [my country]." When the US starts wars that people don't like, half the population tries to influence the government. When minorities are oppressed, people change what happens.

    All countries and places have problems, the difference is what people can do deal with them.